gem_bench 0.0.3 → 0.0.4

data/README.md

@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ Here is an example `irb` session where I have installed only `gem_bench`, `rails
     [GemBench] Will search for gems in ["/Users/pboling/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head@foss/gems", "/Users/pboling/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head@global/gems", "/Users/pboling/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head@foss/bundler/gems"]
     [GemBench] Will check Gemfile at /Users/pboling/Documents/src/my/gem_bench/Gemfile.
     [GemBench] Detected 0 loaded gems
-      (excluding the 2 GemBench is configured to skip)
+      (excluding the 2 loaded gems which GemBench is configured to ignore)
     [GemBench] No gems were evaluated by GemBench.
     [GemBench] Usage: Require another gem in this session to evaluate it.
       Example:
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ For the second run I `require 'rails'` as well, and now I can see which rails de
     [GemBench] Will search for gems in ["/Users/pboling/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head@foss/gems", "/Users/pboling/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head@global/gems", "/Users/pboling/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head@foss/bundler/gems"]
     [GemBench] Will check Gemfile at /Users/pboling/Documents/src/my/gem_bench/Gemfile.
     [GemBench] Detected 14 loaded gems
-      (excluding the 2 GemBench is configured to skip)
+      (excluding the 2 loaded gems which GemBench is configured to ignore)
     [GemBench] You might want to verify that activesupport v3.2.13 really has a Rails::Railtie or Rails::Engine.  Check these files:
       ["/Users/pboling/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head@foss/gems/activesupport-3.2.11/lib/active_support/i18n_railtie.rb", 146]
     [GemBench] You might want to verify that actionpack v3.2.13 really has a Rails::Railtie or Rails::Engine.  Check these files:
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ In a random directory, in an irb session, where there is no Gemfile in sight it
     [GemBench] No Gemfile found.
     [GemBench] Will show bad ideas.  Be Careful.
     [GemBench] Detected 14 loaded gems
-      (excluding the 2 GemBench is configured to skip)
+      (excluding the 2 loaded gems which GemBench is configured to ignore)
 
     [GemBench] Usage: Require another gem in this session to evaluate it.
       Example:
@@ -434,6 +434,8 @@ If found 45 gems which are listed as primary dependencies in my `Gemfile` which
 
 How much faster will my app boot loading 45 fewer gems?  A bit.
 
+**Note:** Some of the gems in the list above should have been excluded.  They are now excluded as of `gem_bench` version 0.0.4.
+
 ## Contributing
 
 1. Fork it

data/lib/gem_bench/team.rb

@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
 module GemBench
   class Team
 
-    EXCLUDE = ['bundler','gem_bench']
+    EXCLUDE = [ 'bundler','gem_bench','i18n-airbrake','devise-async','km','vestal_versions','omniauth-facebook',
+                'flag_shih_tzu','pry-remote','koala','simple_form','thumbs_up','memoist','cancan','friendly_id',
+                'faker']
     # A comment preceding the require: false anywhere on the line should not be considered an active require: false
 
 
@@ -26,7 +28,7 @@ module GemBench
       # Among these there may be some that did not need to be.
       totes = Gem.loaded_specs.values.map {|x| [x.name, x.version.to_s] }
       @excluded, @all = totes.partition {|x| EXCLUDE.include?(x[0]) }
-      exclusions = "\t(excluding the #{self.excluded.length} GemBench is configured to skip)\n" if @excluded.length > 0
+      exclusions = "\t(excluding the #{self.excluded.length} loaded gems which GemBench is configured to ignore)\n" if @excluded.length > 0
       @starters = []
       @benchers = []
       @current_gemfile_suggestions = []

data/lib/gem_bench/version.rb

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 module GemBench
-  VERSION = "0.0.3"
+  VERSION = "0.0.4"
 end

metadata

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 --- !ruby/object:Gem::Specification
 name: gem_bench
 version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version
-  version: 0.0.3
+  version: 0.0.4
   prerelease: 
 platform: ruby
 authors: