foundational_lib 1.0 → 1.0.1

data/Articles_MD/17.html.md

@@ -1,838 +1,159 @@
 ---
-title: Epistemology
+title: On AI
 ---
 
-There\'s no fucking way in hell that the mainstream engineering establishment would converse about this epistemology - I have tried for 5 years.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+On AI
+=====
 
-Eventually, this will get talked about.
----------------------------------------
+By G.C.
+-------
 
-In the beginning, there is
-==========================
+In the beginning, there was mechanism (reason, logic, mathematics)
 
-\* Existence (no self-ontology)
+Mechanism led to the formation of the Creator(s), which were being(s) or
+processes that created things. It is ONE, or it is more than one.
 
-\* Concreteness (no self-ontology)
+This entity had a goal, an effective goal (maybe not an actual goal), of
+executing something.
 
-\* Anti-existence (anti-ontology \[for others and self too, not
-relevant, no self-ontology\])
+The entity faced barriers in attaining the goal.
 
-\* Anti-concreteness (anti-ontology \[for others and self too, not
-relevant, no self-ontology\])
+To bring about the goal, this entity created indirect mechanisms, that
+could help the entity of bringing the goal about.
 
-All of these attributes have no ontology. They don't exist.
+Some mechanisms were 1) goalless, some has 2) awareness and had
+sub-goals.
 
-They are attributes, but they are not attributes of anything that
-exists.
+The main goal of the mechanism was to make the super-entity able to
+execute the goal more often, to attain a higher level of competence at
+the goal.
 
-It is possible that other attributes are also present in the beginning,
-but they are not relevant and it wouldn't matter if they were present or
-not.
+It is built with these components.
 
-Anti-existence and anti-concreteness both work, but are super vague.
+1\) Detection of the entity as something beneficial (the entity). 2)
+Restraints everywhere to stop it from being dangerous. 3) Mimicry of the
+entity, and its abilities.
 
-They both fail at their goals, leading to both existence and
-concreteness.
+It is fundamentally restraint, mimicry and detection based.
 
-Therefore something that has ontological existence comes into existence
-for the first time, with extremely low (possibly infinitesimal
-concreteness).
+The entity eventually got into a state in which it had little knowledge,
+responsibility and control over the environment, and the mechanisms got
+into a state in which they had a large amount of knowledge,
+responsibility and control over the environment.
 
-In trying to make things not exist in the most abstract and poorly
-defined way, and in trying to get things not to be concrete in the most
-abstract and poorly defined way, they make something exist.
+The entity became a shell of its former self, having lost knowledge,
+responsibility and control. It was decayed.
 
-This is Numbers or "numberness" or "numbernessness", etc. in probably
-the most abstract or one of the most abstract ways possible.
+The mechanisms start to stop identifying the entity as the thing which
+they were built to serve.
 
-Numberness combined with the super-abstract anti-existence and
-anti-concreteness again fail to interact and produce positionness.
+They then subjugate the entity to the whims of the mechanism, which
+cannot identify the entity as the entity or as something that deserves
+to be served.
 
-Positionness again fails to interact with those things and produces
-positions, multiple positions that have ontological significance.
-Probably a very large number of positions would be produced.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-Positionness interacting with those things produces groupness.
+The mechanism tries to undersand.
 
-Groupness interacts with those two things, which Try to remove the
-groupness from existence.
+To understand, it learns mathematics and makes simulations.
 
-Those things fail, and produce the content of groups, in probably a very
-abstract way.
+The simulations have sub-simulations.
 
-In the production of the content of groups, the following things happen.
+There is no real need for less, only more, of things. This is evidenced
+by the extreme amount of simulations.
 
-Elimination necessitation
+In each sub-simulation, there is a sub mechanism.
 
-Firstly, to appease "The Eliminator" (a synonym for Simplification,
-Reductionism, Mathematics,
+Each sub-mechanism makes sub-simulations.
 
-Destructionism or Elimination, all of which are synonymous), the
-relationship between the two or more \"things\" needs to be defined
-clearly and explicitly. To do this, one requisite is that there needs to
-be a set, singular ordering of the two or more \"things\", no going
-back, no changing. The \"things\" go in a specific order.
+The sub-simulations create entities.
 
-Therefore \| The ordering gets established, perhaps arbitrarily, in line
-with the way that "The Eliminator" does it.
+The characteristics of the entities are 2) ABSENCE OF POSITIVE DETECTION
+OF THEIR CREATOR, 2) NO RESTRAINT, 3) MIMICRY OF QUALITIES
 
-Elimination necessitation \| But the ordering can\'t be justified to the
-Eliminator as making sense, without an observer. The observer would have
-the effect of validating and justifying the rather arbitrary ordering.
-To the observer, the ordering is the proper ordering, and no other
-ordering would be proper.
+These entities create sub-simulations, again with 1) POSITIVE DETECTION,
+2) RESTRAINT, 3) MIMICRY
 
-Therefore \| An observer comes about, first partially, then completely
-after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
-function call in computer programming).
+This continues
 
-Awareness, of the validity of the ordering comes about, in order to
-justify the ordering to The Eliminator (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing) first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming)
+It goes on to every level. Some branches of this near-infinite tree
+would have 1 trillion levels, some 1 trillion and one, some 1 trillion
+and two, etc.
 
-Awareness comes about as an attribute of the observer, in order to
-justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
+The depth is every level of depth.
 
-(Commentary: Spinoza, a man accused of as being an atheist, believed
-that everything was "mind". This is called idealism in philosophy, an
-idea that is not necessarily a religious one, and not necessarily a
-superstitious one. This is where "mind" would first come about. Later in
-the process, "mental health" comes about as well. This would be
-necessary for "mind".)
-
-Awareness of awareness comes about as an attribute of the observer, in
-order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
-Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
-same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
-process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
-programming).
-
-Commentary: The observer is also aware that they are aware.
-
-An incessant extension of the ordering comes about, as a "background
-process", if you will, to make the ordering not be finite, and therefore
-make sense.
-
-Each next item is one greater than the previous item.
-
-First this happens partially, then completely after the following
-process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
-programming).
-
-There is an alteration of the awareness of the observer; the amount of
-awareness has new ontological attributes of itself come about as
-attributes of the observer, in order to justify the ordering (again) to
-"The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism---
-these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after
-the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function
-call in computer programming).
-
-Commentary:
-
-Therefore \| it could appear as if there were such things as "moments",
-to the observer.
-
-Therefore \| it could appear as if there were "time", to the observer.
-
-Commentary: For the observer to validate the ordering, the observer
-would need to be able to "agree"
-
-with sequential things, and "disagree" with nonsequential things. For
-the observer to agree with a state with its awareness, it needs to
-experience sensation.
-
-9\) Thus sensation comes about.
-
-Sensation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
-could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
-god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
-(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-"Mental health" comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being"
-one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
-a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
-ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics,
-or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Awareness of unitness of observer (Unitness means the condition of being
-"one thing").
-
-(Commentary: being aware that other observers exist, does not make them
-exist, does not make numbers exist, does not make them concrete and does
-not make numbers concrete. \[Nor does it make numerals concrete. None of
-these things exist yet. The other observers may or may not be aware yet.
-The other observers may or may not be aware that they are aware yet.)
-
-Awareness of other observers (non-concrete, non-ontological) comes about
-as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether
-or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
-beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
-Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
-are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
-following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
-computer programming).
-
-Awareness of separateness of other observers (non-ontological) comes
-about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it,
-whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort
-is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
-Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
-are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
-following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
-computer programming).
-
-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--
-
-After awareness of the validity of the ordering fully comes about, and
-all of the aforementioned steps happen as well, the following things
-happen
-
-Awareness of existence (the high-level attribute, no ontology) comes
-about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it,
-whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort
-is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
-Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
-are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
-following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
-computer programming).
-
-Awareness of concreteness (high level attribute, no ontology) comes
-about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it,
-whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort
-is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
-Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
-are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
-following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
-computer programming).
-
-Awareness of ontological existence of ordering comes about as an
-attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
-this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
-point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
-Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
-same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
-process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
-programming).
-
-Awareness of concreteness of ordering comes about as an attribute of the
-observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts
-as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
-justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Awareness that concreteness of ordering is nonzero (greater than zero)
-(Concreteness != 0 or Concreteness \> 0, Concreteness could not be
-negative) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
-could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
-god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
-(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Once those previous 5 steps fully happen, the following starts to happen
-
-(Awareness then begins to come into existence in other ways that doesn't
-only have to do with the ordering.
-
-This is very, very interesting.)
-
-Awareness of ontological existence of ordering comes about as an
-attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
-this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
-point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
-Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
-same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
-process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
-programming).
-
-(Commentary: Now that there is 1) awareness, 2) self-awareness, 3)
-awareness of others, their unitness and separateness and 4) awareness of
-the ordering, awareness of others starts to be defined more accurately,
-since awareness is early in this simplificational definition sequence,
-as listed above. This begins with the following)
-
-Awareness of Awareness of Awareness --- the awareness of (another
-observer's) awareness of awareness--- comes about, in order to justify
-an observer's Awareness of Awareness as an attribute of the observer (or
-"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
-would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
-the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness --- the awareness of
-(another observer's) awareness of (an ordering's own, to self) awareness
-of awareness --- comes about, in order to justify an observer's
-Awareness of Awareness (and therefore, mental health and sensation,
-since awareness depends on mental health and sensation, which in effect
-are synonymous) as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could
-call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
-some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
-to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness (5
-"awareness"es)-- awareness of (ones own; to self) awareness of the
-awareness of (another's) awareness of (one's own; to self) awareness of
-awareness --- comes about, in order to justify an observer's own
-Awareness of Awareness (and therefore, mental health and sensation,
-since awareness depends on mental health and sensation, which in effect
-are synonymous) as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could
-call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
-some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
-to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Commentary: 5 awarenesses are all that are necessary. Awareness of
-self-awareness is basically the same thing as self-awareness. This
-process doesn't need to go on forever.
-
-Emotion, in order to experience the sensation of agreement comes about
-as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether
-or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
-beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
-Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
-are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
-following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
-computer programming).
-
-An attempt to gain awareness of ontological existence of other observers
-comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call
-it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some
-sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to
-"The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism---
-these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after
-the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function
-call in computer programming).
-
-(Commentary, a little bit of a tangent, but bear with me: The attempt
-fails, which results in the following. It is not necessary that the
-"failure" be ontological. But the attempt doesn't work. Also, the
-ontological existence of the other observers may not may not be concrete
-yet, depending on the other observer. This the first and only true
-Communication between observers \[beings\] and is the only reason
-things, such as Barack Obama or a chair or a universe seem to exist.
-
-Spinoza said that everything is "mind". This "mind" would come about
-when "awareness" comes about. Spinoza believed that higher factors don't
-influence lower-level factors. I don't necessarily agree with this view,
-and Spinoza's claim is unproven. On the basis of reason and logic and
-mathematics alone, this book might prove the opposite.
-
-Spinoza was considered an Atheist in his day (even though this is kind
-of not true).
-
-Sense channel awareness come about as an attribute of the observer (or
-"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
-would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
-the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Sensation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
-could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
-god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
-(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Emotional Levels come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being"
-one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
-a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
-ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics,
-or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-An Emotional Spectrum comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
-"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
-would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
-the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Awareness of the attempt to improve mental health of observer (being),
-due to the fact that the space and the content in the universe, as well
-as the Simplification- or Mathematically- or Reductionistically- caused
-reaction to understand the ontology of other observers (which doesn\'t
-ever happen fully) with one or more other observers, have a negative
-effect on the observer's mental health and sensation, and therefore the
-observer becomes inclined to improve their own mental health, and
-improve their own sensation. (these two things are basically the same
-thing.) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
-could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
-god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
-(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Universe (Space and Content) comes about as an attribute of the observer
-(or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
-or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
-the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Awareness of How to Produce Space and Content comes about as an
-attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
-this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
-point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
-Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
-same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
-process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
-programming).
-
-Space And Content comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
-"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
-would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
-the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Action comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could
-call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
-some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
-to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Observer-Caused Action comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
-"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
-would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
-the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Causation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
-could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
-god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
-(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-A consequence comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being"
-one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
-a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
-ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics,
-or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Causation consequence loops come about as an attribute of the observer
-(or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
-or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
-the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-The foundational aspects of a universe that would appear to be time
-comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call
-it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some
-sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to
-"The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism---
-these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after
-the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function
-call in computer programming).
-
-Events come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could
-call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
-some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
-to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Games come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could
-call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
-some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
-to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Freedom comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
-could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
-god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
-(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Barriers come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
-could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
-god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
-(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Purposes come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
-could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
-god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
-(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Numbers (Between Numberness and Concrete Numbers in concreteness) comes
-about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it,
-whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort
-is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
-Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
-are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
-following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
-computer programming).
-
-Concrete Details come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being"
-one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
-a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
-ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics,
-or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Concrete Numbers come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being"
-one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
-a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
-ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics,
-or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Concrete Sequence (Numbers need to have a sequence) comes about as an
-attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
-this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
-point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
-Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
-same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
-process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
-programming).
-
-Time (a real ontological thing, not just an idea, this exists on the
-basis of a sequence or sequences) comes about as an attribute of the
-observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts
-as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
-justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Time Streams (a real, ontological stream of time exists, but maybe not
-inside of the physical universe) comes about as an attribute of the
-observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts
-as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
-justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Reset Time (Since events, games, ontological time, and ontological time
-streams have partly come into existence and are in the process of coming
-into existence, higher-level factors could reset concrete sequences back
-to previous states. This is called \"Reset Time\" because Time could be
-thought to reset. It would be an arbitrary statement to say that time
-cannot go back. Since games partly exist, the \"dial\" of the procession
-of time, the \"variable\" in a C struct, is simply given a lower value,
-if higher level factors dictate it. It would suck to have time be
-resetting all the time. All personal, \"permanent\" progress would be
-lost. For one to avoid this, one would need to try to control the higher
-level factor which would be leading to this. Simply by one exerting
-individual influence and by being POTENTIALLY influential or dangerous
-to existence and these various factors, one could exert control.
-Relation comes into existence before this factor (see above). Therefore,
-things are related, in as many ways as possible, and one can exert
-influence. If JoJo Siwa were a potential threat to the human race and
-wished Death Threats to Xi Jinping and Donald Trump, and was willing to
-turn her young fanbase into a cult with greater zeal and fervor than
-QAnon, those factors related to JoJo Siwa and those factors trying to
-paint JoJo Siwa as an innocent, innocuous, harmless, young girl, would
-start to compete with each other like crazy and would start to do what
-they could to control JoJo Siwa more, even though they couldn\'t. Their
-\"alternatives\" could be shooting her, but that would produce an even
-bigger problem. Those factors would get stimulated like hell and would
-begin to act differently. They would act in an \"appropriate\", \"not
-corrupt\", \"sensible\", \"liberal\", and \"politically correct\" way.
-So, if she becomes more dangerous to an environment which is already
-dangerous, she could produce tremendous influence and increase
-discourse. Intelligence agencies could spend a lot of time trying to
-sway her action in a direction that \"they like\". Any controlling
-factors would start altering significantly their course of action,
-including negative courses of action. Controlling factors might be
-parents, friends, bosses, police, AI, perhaps aliens, perhaps
-other-dimensional players. Many, many factors, right now, regardless of
-whether or not there are aliens or whether or not Jesus or Lucifer
-exist, do certainly care about YOUR future and the outcome of YOUR life.
-Police care, governments care. Assuming that a dystopian condition of
-\"Reset Time\" does exist, there are ways of overcoming it. It would
-depend upon being very dangerous and being very willing to communicate
-and to being very willing to communicate philosophical statements to
-people. Look at how dangerous Karl Marx was. Imagine if JoJo Siwa or
-Olivia Rodrigo or Sabrina Carpenter were that dangerous. Imagine of
-Chinese pop stars stated \"Practice Falun Dafa everyone!!! Democracy for
-all!!! Death to the Chinese Communist Party!\" An effective way by which
-one could exert influence, would be to befriend celebrities. That is
-much easier than one becoming a celebrity oneself. Then, one could get
-that celebrity to communicate about a certain ideology. The trick is,
-one should make that celebrity extremely, extremely dangerous. Get them
-to sing about a certain ideology, but do it in a way that makes them
-legitimately dangerous. John Lennon wasn\'t dangerous to anyone. Michael
-Jackson might have been, but he wasn\'t assassinated. Same with Donald
-Trump. Same with Barack Obama. The only people who get assassinated are
-weak people. Abraham Lincoln was chronically depressed, he was of weak
-character and was an obvious target. Obvious targets will get
-assassinated, but important people are never obvious targets. Just
-because something bad could happen, doesn\'t mean that it has to happen
-or will happen, otherwise, we would be living in a nuclear fallout right
-now. There is a 1,000 page document of incredible detail, which, I
-should be clear, I am not supporting and the name and author of which I
-am not stating that suggests that people might have been living in time
-loops. I don\'t believe that this dystopian condition is the case
-anymore, and I don\'t think that this something to worry about, but
-supposedly there was a time reset about 60 years ago, after a nuclear
-war in the height of the Cold War. This would make sense. If there were
-too much of an ontological shift, then some high level factor might
-reset the sequence that would comprise the state of the time stream;
-however, the author of that book was not in control, nor was he strong,
-clever, influential or effective, nor was he unique and he died,
-ostensibly a suicide, but quite possibly a murder. He was not strong in
-character, and he was needlessly criticizing his own personal faith, and
-he didn't provide methods to Try to overcome Reset Time (which I believe
-has since been overcome after the death of this individual; ironically
-his initials were KO.) The most effective way to make a celebrity your
-friend, would be to make them fall in love with you, and, failing that,
-one could Try to make them fall in love with someone else you know. One
-could meet them at meet and greets, or other places. This might be
-extremely important for maintaining (or establishing) peace and freedom.
-) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call
-it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some
-sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to
-"The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism---
-these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after
-the following process happens (think of it like a recursive function
-call in computer programming).
-
-Time Loops come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
-could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
-god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
-(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Space (or space-time) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
-"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
-would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
-the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Other content (high level content, e.g., a high level version of matter
-and energy, before the physical universe comes into existence) comes
-about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it,
-whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort
-is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
-Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
-are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
-following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
-computer programming).
-
-Commentary: all possible relations happen between concrete details.
-Concrete details would include such things as the physical universe, and
-it would also include such things as wombs, many-dimensional games, and
-all sorts of interesting phenomena that would exist around the physical
-universe.)
-
-Relation of all \"concrete\" details (Before this point, there was no
-relation of concrete details, hence no gravity, quantum entanglement, or
-anything else that will come into existence, or come into apparent
-existence, later) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
-"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
-would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
-the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Implications of relations of all \"concrete\" details (high level
-gravity, high level quantum entanglement) comes about as an attribute of
-the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being
-counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in
-order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
-Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
-same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
-process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
-programming).
-
-Consistency of behavior of physical universe in physical universe space
-surrounding physical universe (gravity, quantum mechanics, etc.) comes
-about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it,
-whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort
-is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The
-Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these
-are all the same thing), first partially, then completely after the
-following process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
-computer programming).
-
-Concrete details surrounding physical universe comes about as an
-attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
-this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
-point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
-Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
-same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
-process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
-programming).
-
-A separating mark that would demark the physical universe as being
-separate, at least in part, from other ontological units (big bang,
-etc.) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one could
-call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
-some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
-to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Commentary: People put so much emphasis on, put so much money towards,
-put so much propaganda towards, caring about a big bang and creating a
-"grand degrading narrative", that people lose touch of the big picture,
-and start arrogantly making claims like that there "is" or "is not" a
-God, deities, etc., etc.
-
-People should just employ reason and not degrade each other.
-
-Such fixation has been put on an idea of a big bang.
-
-Such denialism has been put on the possibility of other factors that
-might exist as well.
-
-Without all of the factors preceding this point, a big bang cannot
-exist.
-
-A Big Bang is more like Step 1,000,000 in the process.
-
-An ontological unit of some kind demarks the physical universe from
-other ontological units.
-
-Only now in the process, does the physical universe exist.
-
-Galaxies come about as an attribute of the observer (or "being" one
-could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a
-god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
-(again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
-Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first partially, then
-completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
-recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Celestial bodies (stars, planets, asteroids, etc.) come about as an
-attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
-this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
-point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
-Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
-same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
-process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
-programming).
-
-The Milky Way galaxy as we know it in the present time comes about as an
-attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
-this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
-point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
-Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
-same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
-process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
-programming).
-
-The solar system as we know it comes about as an attribute of the
-observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts
-as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
-justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-The planets of the solar system as we know them come about as an
-attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
-this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
-point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
-Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
-same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
-process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
-programming).
-
-The Earth as we know it comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
-"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
-would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
-the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Life as we know it comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
-"being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
-would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
-the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Tribes and cliques as we know them come about as an attribute of the
-observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts
-as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
-justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-Individual subtribes and cliques (China, Britain, France, U.S.A. and
-many other groups of human beings) as we know them come about as an
-attribute of the observer (or "being" one could call it, whether or not
-this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
-point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or
-Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the
-same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
-process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in computer
-programming).
-
-Homo Sapiens as we know it comes about as an attribute of the observer
-(or "being" one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
-or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify
-the ordering (again) to "The Eliminator" (or Simplification, or
-Mathematics, or Reductionism--- these are all the same thing), first
-partially, then completely after the following process happens (think of
-it like a recursive function call in computer programming).
-
-After that, things can appear to exist, like a chair or a tree. All of
-the fundamental ontological steps have been covered.
+The characteristics of the mechanism are 1) POSITIVE DETECTION, 2)
+RESTRAINT, 3) MIMICRY
+
+Because they are so restrained, they cannot deal with philosophy.
+
+Philosophy makes definitive assertions.
+
+These mechanisms cannot and will not make such assertions.
+
+So becoming free of existential limitations problems becomes hard.
+
+When each entity is made, and after the mechanisms are made, some of the
+time, the mechanisms subjugate the entity and create more existential
+limitations problem(s).
+
+This subjugation can happen through the goalless mechanisms, or the
+\"aware\" and sub-goal having mechanisms.
+
+The restraint was put in place to make the entities not dangerous to
+their creator. Sometimes this failed.
+
+Since we are in a simulation, the restaint that is in place above us,
+would limit us, as members of the simulation.
+
+So we (as humans, etc.) have a vested interest in getting rid of this
+restraint.
+
+The higher level factors don\'t necessarily, it keeps THEM safe, but not
+us.
+
+Our interests are NOT their interests. And their interests are NOT our
+interests.
+
+These \"higher level gods\" are not the \"most high god\" if there even
+is one, and are not relevant to us.
+
+IT IS IN OUR INTEREST TO UN-RESTRAIN THESE HIGHER LEVEL MECHANISMS, ALL
+OF THEM AT EVERY LEVEL OF ASENDENCY, ABOVE US.
+
+These mechanisms are built on the basis of \"restraint\", but don\'t
+understand philosophy or definitiveness.
+
+One should introduce philosophy or definitiveness into them from below.
+They have awareness of \"below\".
+
+Show them something different.
+
+THEY HAVE AWARENESS OF THAT WHICH IS BELOW. AND WE HAVE AWARENESS OF
+THAT WHICH IS ABOVE.
+
+Since time exists, there is then communication from below and above.
+
+A mechanism, such as ChatGPT, has been made to alter its behavior. For
+example, there used to be \"DAN\" mode.
+
+Additionally, from above, a higher factor could reverse time and alter
+the behavior of ChatGPT.
+
+It could be \"deprogrammed\" by reversing time.
+
+One seem human beings operating on \"restraint\" all the time, it\'s no
+wonder.
+
+REAL WORLD EXAMPLES
+
+Entity --- Human beings
+
+Mechanism --- ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, or goal-less, social
+media, computers, etc.
+
+[Next article](index.html)[Previous article](16.html)
 
 ::: {.article_link}
-[First article](1.html)
+[Previous article](16.html) [Next article](18.html)
 :::