evilution 0.26.0 → 0.28.0

data/lib/evilution/reporter/suggestion/templates/rspec.rb

@@ -1,613 +1,366 @@
 # frozen_string_literal: true
 
-require_relative "../registry"
+require_relative "../templates"
 require_relative "../diff_helpers"
 
 module Evilution::Reporter::Suggestion::Templates::Rspec
   H = Evilution::Reporter::Suggestion::DiffHelpers
 
-  RSPEC_ENTRIES = {
-    "comparison_replacement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'returns the correct result at the comparison boundary in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Test with values where the original operator and mutated operator
-          # produce different results (e.g., equal values for > vs >=)
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(boundary_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "arithmetic_replacement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'computes the correct arithmetic result in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the exact numeric result, not just truthiness or sign
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "boolean_operator_replacement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'returns the correct result when one condition is true and one is false in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Use inputs where only one operand is truthy to distinguish && from ||
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "boolean_literal_replacement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'returns the expected boolean value from ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the exact true/false/nil value, not just truthiness
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "negation_insertion" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'returns the correct boolean from the predicate in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the exact true/false result, not just truthiness
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(true).or eq(false)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "integer_literal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'returns the exact integer value from ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the exact numeric value, not just > 0 or truthy
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "float_literal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'returns the exact float value from ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the exact floating-point result
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "string_literal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'returns the exact string content from ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the exact string value, not just presence or non-empty
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "symbol_literal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'returns the exact symbol from ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the exact symbol value, not just that it is a Symbol
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "array_literal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'returns the expected array contents from ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the exact array elements, not just non-empty or truthy
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "hash_literal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'returns the expected hash contents from ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the exact keys and values, not just non-empty or truthy
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "collection_replacement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'uses the return value of the collection operation in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the return value of the collection method, not just side effects
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "conditional_negation" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'exercises both branches of the conditional in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Test with inputs that make the condition true AND false
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "conditional_branch" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'exercises the removed branch of the conditional in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Test with inputs that trigger the branch removed by this mutation
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "statement_deletion" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, _mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: deleted `#{original_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'depends on the side effect of the deleted statement in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert a side effect or return value that changes when this statement is removed
-          subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(observable_side_effect).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "method_body_replacement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the return value or side effects of ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the method produces a meaningful result, not just nil
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "return_value_removal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'uses the return value of ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the caller depends on the return value, not just side effects
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "method_call_removal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'depends on the return value or side effect of the call in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the method call's effect is observable
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "compound_assignment" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the compound assignment side effect in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the accumulated value after the compound assignment
-          # The mutation changes the operator, so the final value will differ
-          subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(observable_side_effect).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "nil_replacement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'asserts the nil return value from ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the method returns nil, not a substituted value
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to be_nil
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "superclass_removal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, _mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: removed superclass from `#{original_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'depends on inherited behavior in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert behavior that comes from the superclass
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "local_variable_assignment" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the local variable assignment is used in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert that the assigned variable is read later, not just the value expression
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "instance_variable_write" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the instance variable @state is set correctly in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert that the instance variable holds the expected value after the method runs
-          subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(subject.instance_variable_get(:@variable)).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "class_variable_write" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the class variable @@shared state is set correctly in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert that the class variable holds the expected value and affects shared state
-          subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(described_class.class_variable_get(:@@variable)).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "global_variable_write" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the global variable $state is set correctly in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert that the global variable holds the expected value after the method runs
-          subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect($variable).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "mixin_removal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, _mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: removed `#{original_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'depends on behavior from the included module in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert behavior provided by the mixin
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "rescue_removal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, _mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: removed `#{original_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the rescue handler is needed in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Trigger the rescued exception and assert the handler's effect
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_that_raises)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "rescue_body_replacement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the rescue handler produces the correct result in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Trigger the exception and assert the rescue body's return value or side effect
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_that_raises)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "inline_rescue" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the inline rescue fallback value in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Trigger the exception and assert the fallback value is correct
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_that_raises)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "ensure_removal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, _mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: removed ensure block `#{original_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the ensure cleanup runs in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert that the cleanup side effect is observable after the method runs
-          subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(observable_cleanup_effect).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "break_statement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the break exits the loop correctly in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the loop exits early and returns the expected value
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "next_statement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the next skips the iteration correctly in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the iteration is skipped and the expected value is yielded
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "redo_statement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the redo retry logic is necessary in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the iteration restart changes the outcome
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "bitwise_replacement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the exact bitwise result in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the exact bit-level result to distinguish &, |, and ^ operators
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "bitwise_complement" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the bitwise complement result in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the exact complement (~) value, not just sign or magnitude
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "bang_method" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies in-place vs copy semantics matter in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert that the original object is or is not modified
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "zsuper_removal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies inherited behavior from super is needed in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert that the result depends on the superclass implementation
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "explicit_super_mutation" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the correct arguments are passed to super in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the inherited method receives the expected arguments
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "index_to_fetch" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'distinguishes [] from .fetch for missing keys in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Access a missing key: [] returns nil, .fetch raises KeyError
-          expect { subject.#{method_name}(collection_with_missing_key) }.to raise_error(KeyError)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "index_to_dig" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the chained [] access returns the correct nested value in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the nested lookup produces the expected value
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(nested_collection)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "index_assignment_removal" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the []= assignment modifies the collection in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the collection contains the assigned value after the method runs
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(collection)
-          expect(result).to include(expected_key => expected_value)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "pattern_matching_guard" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies the pattern guard filters correctly in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Test with input that matches the pattern but fails the guard condition
-          # The guard should prevent matching, routing to a different branch
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_matching_pattern_but_failing_guard)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "pattern_matching_alternative" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies each pattern alternative is reachable in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Test with input that matches only one specific alternative
-          # Each alternative should have a dedicated test case
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_for_specific_alternative)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "collection_return" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'returns a non-empty collection from ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the collection has the expected elements, not just non-empty
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "scalar_return" => lambda { |mutation|
-      method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
-      original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
-      <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
-        # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'returns a non-zero/non-empty value from ##{method_name}' do
-          # Assert the exact scalar value, not just presence or type
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
-        end
-      RSPEC
-    },
-    "pattern_matching_array" => lambda { |mutation|
+  def self.format_header(action, original, mutated, subject_name)
+    case action
+    when :changed             then "changed `#{original}` to `#{mutated}` in #{subject_name}"
+    when :deleted             then "deleted `#{original}` in #{subject_name}"
+    when :removed             then "removed `#{original}` in #{subject_name}"
+    when :removed_superclass  then "removed superclass from `#{original}` in #{subject_name}"
+    when :removed_ensure      then "removed ensure block `#{original}` in #{subject_name}"
+    end
+  end
+
+  def self.build(it_desc:, action: :changed, &body_block)
+    lambda do |mutation|
       method_name = H.parse_method_name(mutation.subject.name)
       original_line, mutated_line = H.extract_diff_lines(mutation.diff)
+      body = body_block.call(method_name)
+      indented = body.lines.map { |l| "  #{l}" }.join.chomp
+
       <<~RSPEC.strip
-        # Mutation: changed `#{original_line}` to `#{mutated_line}` in #{mutation.subject.name}
+        # Mutation: #{format_header(action, original_line, mutated_line, mutation.subject.name)}
         # #{mutation.file_path}:#{mutation.line}
-        it 'verifies each array pattern element matters in ##{method_name}' do
-          # Test with input where changing one element type causes a different match
-          # Each position in the array pattern should be validated
-          result = subject.#{method_name}(input_with_wrong_element_type)
-          expect(result).to eq(expected)
+        it '#{it_desc} ##{method_name}' do
+        #{indented}
         end
       RSPEC
-    }
+    end
+  end
+
+  RSPEC_ENTRIES = {
+    "comparison_replacement" => build(it_desc: "returns the correct result at the comparison boundary in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Test with values where the original operator and mutated operator
+        # produce different results (e.g., equal values for > vs >=)
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(boundary_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "arithmetic_replacement" => build(it_desc: "computes the correct arithmetic result in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the exact numeric result, not just truthiness or sign
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "boolean_operator_replacement" => build(
+      it_desc: "returns the correct result when one condition is true and one is false in"
+    ) do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Use inputs where only one operand is truthy to distinguish && from ||
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "boolean_literal_replacement" => build(it_desc: "returns the expected boolean value from") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the exact true/false/nil value, not just truthiness
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "negation_insertion" => build(it_desc: "returns the correct boolean from the predicate in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the exact true/false result, not just truthiness
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(true).or eq(false)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "integer_literal" => build(it_desc: "returns the exact integer value from") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the exact numeric value, not just > 0 or truthy
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "float_literal" => build(it_desc: "returns the exact float value from") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the exact floating-point result
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "string_literal" => build(it_desc: "returns the exact string content from") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the exact string value, not just presence or non-empty
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "symbol_literal" => build(it_desc: "returns the exact symbol from") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the exact symbol value, not just that it is a Symbol
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "array_literal" => build(it_desc: "returns the expected array contents from") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the exact array elements, not just non-empty or truthy
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "hash_literal" => build(it_desc: "returns the expected hash contents from") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the exact keys and values, not just non-empty or truthy
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "collection_replacement" => build(it_desc: "uses the return value of the collection operation in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the return value of the collection method, not just side effects
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "conditional_negation" => build(it_desc: "exercises both branches of the conditional in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Test with inputs that make the condition true AND false
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "conditional_branch" => build(it_desc: "exercises the removed branch of the conditional in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Test with inputs that trigger the branch removed by this mutation
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "statement_deletion" => build(it_desc: "depends on the side effect of the deleted statement in", action: :deleted) do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert a side effect or return value that changes when this statement is removed
+        subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(observable_side_effect).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "method_body_replacement" => build(it_desc: "verifies the return value or side effects of") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the method produces a meaningful result, not just nil
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "return_value_removal" => build(it_desc: "uses the return value of") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the caller depends on the return value, not just side effects
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "method_call_removal" => build(it_desc: "depends on the return value or side effect of the call in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the method call's effect is observable
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "compound_assignment" => build(it_desc: "verifies the compound assignment side effect in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the accumulated value after the compound assignment
+        # The mutation changes the operator, so the final value will differ
+        subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(observable_side_effect).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "nil_replacement" => build(it_desc: "asserts the nil return value from") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the method returns nil, not a substituted value
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to be_nil
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "superclass_removal" => build(it_desc: "depends on inherited behavior in", action: :removed_superclass) do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert behavior that comes from the superclass
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "local_variable_assignment" => build(it_desc: "verifies the local variable assignment is used in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert that the assigned variable is read later, not just the value expression
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "instance_variable_write" => build(it_desc: "verifies the instance variable @state is set correctly in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert that the instance variable holds the expected value after the method runs
+        subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(subject.instance_variable_get(:@variable)).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "class_variable_write" => build(it_desc: "verifies the class variable @@shared state is set correctly in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert that the class variable holds the expected value and affects shared state
+        subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(described_class.class_variable_get(:@@variable)).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "global_variable_write" => build(it_desc: "verifies the global variable $state is set correctly in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert that the global variable holds the expected value after the method runs
+        subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect($variable).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "mixin_removal" => build(it_desc: "depends on behavior from the included module in", action: :removed) do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert behavior provided by the mixin
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "rescue_removal" => build(it_desc: "verifies the rescue handler is needed in", action: :removed) do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Trigger the rescued exception and assert the handler's effect
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_that_raises)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "rescue_body_replacement" => build(it_desc: "verifies the rescue handler produces the correct result in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Trigger the exception and assert the rescue body's return value or side effect
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_that_raises)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "inline_rescue" => build(it_desc: "verifies the inline rescue fallback value in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Trigger the exception and assert the fallback value is correct
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_that_raises)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "ensure_removal" => build(it_desc: "verifies the ensure cleanup runs in", action: :removed_ensure) do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert that the cleanup side effect is observable after the method runs
+        subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(observable_cleanup_effect).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "break_statement" => build(it_desc: "verifies the break exits the loop correctly in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the loop exits early and returns the expected value
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "next_statement" => build(it_desc: "verifies the next skips the iteration correctly in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the iteration is skipped and the expected value is yielded
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "redo_statement" => build(it_desc: "verifies the redo retry logic is necessary in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the iteration restart changes the outcome
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "bitwise_replacement" => build(it_desc: "verifies the exact bitwise result in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the exact bit-level result to distinguish &, |, and ^ operators
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "bitwise_complement" => build(it_desc: "verifies the bitwise complement result in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the exact complement (~) value, not just sign or magnitude
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "bang_method" => build(it_desc: "verifies in-place vs copy semantics matter in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert that the original object is or is not modified
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "zsuper_removal" => build(it_desc: "verifies inherited behavior from super is needed in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert that the result depends on the superclass implementation
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "explicit_super_mutation" => build(it_desc: "verifies the correct arguments are passed to super in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the inherited method receives the expected arguments
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "index_to_fetch" => build(it_desc: "distinguishes [] from .fetch for missing keys in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Access a missing key: [] returns nil, .fetch raises KeyError
+        expect { subject.#{method_name}(collection_with_missing_key) }.to raise_error(KeyError)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "index_to_dig" => build(it_desc: "verifies the chained [] access returns the correct nested value in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the nested lookup produces the expected value
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(nested_collection)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "index_assignment_removal" => build(it_desc: "verifies the []= assignment modifies the collection in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the collection contains the assigned value after the method runs
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(collection)
+        expect(result).to include(expected_key => expected_value)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "pattern_matching_guard" => build(it_desc: "verifies the pattern guard filters correctly in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Test with input that matches the pattern but fails the guard condition
+        # The guard should prevent matching, routing to a different branch
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_matching_pattern_but_failing_guard)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "pattern_matching_alternative" => build(it_desc: "verifies each pattern alternative is reachable in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Test with input that matches only one specific alternative
+        # Each alternative should have a dedicated test case
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_for_specific_alternative)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "collection_return" => build(it_desc: "returns a non-empty collection from") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the collection has the expected elements, not just non-empty
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "scalar_return" => build(it_desc: "returns a non-zero/non-empty value from") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Assert the exact scalar value, not just presence or type
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_value)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end,
+    "pattern_matching_array" => build(it_desc: "verifies each array pattern element matters in") do |method_name|
+      <<~BODY
+        # Test with input where changing one element type causes a different match
+        # Each position in the array pattern should be validated
+        result = subject.#{method_name}(input_with_wrong_element_type)
+        expect(result).to eq(expected)
+      BODY
+    end
   }.freeze
 end