doorkeeper 4.2.5

3 security vulnerabilities found in version 4.2.5

Doorkeeper gem does not revoke token for public clients

high severity CVE-2018-1000211
high severity CVE-2018-1000211
Patched versions: >= 4.4.0, >= 5.0.0.rc2
Unaffected versions: < 4.2.0

Any OAuth application that uses public/non-confidential authentication when interacting with Doorkeeper is unable to revoke its tokens when calling the revocation endpoint.

A bug in the token revocation API would cause it to attempt to authenticate the public OAuth client as if it was a confidential app. Because of this, the token is never revoked.

The impact of this is the access or refresh token is not revoked, leaking access to protected resources for the remainder of that token's lifetime.

If Doorkeeper is used to facilitate public OAuth apps and leverage token revocation functionality, upgrade to the patched versions immediately.

Credit to Roberto Ostinelli for discovery, Justin Bull for the fixes.

DWF has assigned CVE-2018-1000211.

Doorkeeper gem has stored XSS on authorization consent view

high severity CVE-2018-1000088
high severity CVE-2018-1000088
Patched versions: >= 4.2.6
Unaffected versions: < 2.1.0

Stored XSS on the OAuth Client's name will cause users being prompted for consent via the "implicit" grant type to execute the XSS payload.

The XSS attack could gain access to the user's active session, resulting in account compromise.

Any user is susceptible if they click the authorization link for the malicious OAuth client. Because of how the links work, a user cannot tell if a link is malicious or not without first visiting the page with the XSS payload.

If 3rd parties are allowed to create OAuth clients in the app using Doorkeeper, upgrade to the patched versions immediately.

Additionally there is stored XSS in the native_redirect_uri form element.

DWF has assigned CVE-2018-1000088.

Doorkeeper Improper Authentication vulnerability

medium severity CVE-2023-34246
medium severity CVE-2023-34246
Patched versions: >= 5.6.6

OAuth RFC 8252 says https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8252#section-8.6

the authorization server SHOULD NOT process authorization requests automatically without user consent or interaction, except when the identity of the client can be assured. This includes the case where the user has previously approved an authorization request for a given client id

But Doorkeeper automatically processes authorization requests without user consent for public clients that have been previous approved. Public clients are inherently vulnerable to impersonation, their identity cannot be assured.

Issue https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/1589

Fix https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/pull/1646

No officially reported memory leakage issues detected.


This gem version does not have any officially reported memory leaked issues.

No license issues detected.


This gem version has a license in the gemspec.

This gem version is available.


This gem version has not been yanked and is still available for usage.