decision_agent 0.2.0 → 1.0.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- checksums.yaml +4 -4
- data/README.md +313 -8
- data/bin/decision_agent +104 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/agent.rb +72 -1
- data/lib/decision_agent/context.rb +1 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/cache/memory_adapter.rb +86 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/cache_adapter.rb +49 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/circuit_breaker.rb +135 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/client.rb +220 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/config.rb +78 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/data_enrichment/errors.rb +36 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/decision.rb +102 -2
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/adapter.rb +135 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/cache.rb +306 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/decision_graph.rb +327 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/decision_tree.rb +192 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/errors.rb +30 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/exporter.rb +217 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/feel/evaluator.rb +819 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/feel/functions.rb +420 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/feel/parser.rb +349 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/feel/simple_parser.rb +276 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/feel/transformer.rb +372 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/feel/types.rb +276 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/importer.rb +77 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/model.rb +197 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/parser.rb +191 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/testing.rb +333 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/validator.rb +315 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/versioning.rb +229 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dmn/visualizer.rb +513 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/dsl/condition_evaluator.rb +984 -838
- data/lib/decision_agent/dsl/schema_validator.rb +53 -14
- data/lib/decision_agent/evaluators/dmn_evaluator.rb +308 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/evaluators/json_rule_evaluator.rb +69 -9
- data/lib/decision_agent/explainability/condition_trace.rb +83 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/explainability/explainability_result.rb +52 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/explainability/rule_trace.rb +39 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/explainability/trace_collector.rb +24 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/monitoring/alert_manager.rb +5 -1
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/errors.rb +18 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/impact_analyzer.rb +498 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/monte_carlo_simulator.rb +635 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/replay_engine.rb +486 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/scenario_engine.rb +318 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/scenario_library.rb +163 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/shadow_test_engine.rb +287 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation/what_if_analyzer.rb +1002 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/simulation.rb +17 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/version.rb +1 -1
- data/lib/decision_agent/versioning/activerecord_adapter.rb +23 -8
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/dmn_editor.rb +426 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/app.js +119 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/dmn-editor.css +596 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/dmn-editor.html +250 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/dmn-editor.js +553 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/index.html +52 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation.html +130 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation_impact.html +478 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation_replay.html +551 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation_shadow.html +546 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/simulation_whatif.html +532 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/public/styles.css +86 -0
- data/lib/decision_agent/web/server.rb +1059 -23
- data/lib/decision_agent.rb +60 -2
- metadata +105 -61
- data/spec/ab_testing/ab_test_assignment_spec.rb +0 -253
- data/spec/ab_testing/ab_test_manager_spec.rb +0 -612
- data/spec/ab_testing/ab_test_spec.rb +0 -270
- data/spec/ab_testing/ab_testing_agent_spec.rb +0 -481
- data/spec/ab_testing/storage/adapter_spec.rb +0 -64
- data/spec/ab_testing/storage/memory_adapter_spec.rb +0 -485
- data/spec/activerecord_thread_safety_spec.rb +0 -553
- data/spec/advanced_operators_spec.rb +0 -3150
- data/spec/agent_spec.rb +0 -289
- data/spec/api_contract_spec.rb +0 -430
- data/spec/audit_adapters_spec.rb +0 -92
- data/spec/auth/access_audit_logger_spec.rb +0 -394
- data/spec/auth/authenticator_spec.rb +0 -112
- data/spec/auth/password_reset_spec.rb +0 -294
- data/spec/auth/permission_checker_spec.rb +0 -207
- data/spec/auth/permission_spec.rb +0 -73
- data/spec/auth/rbac_adapter_spec.rb +0 -550
- data/spec/auth/rbac_config_spec.rb +0 -82
- data/spec/auth/role_spec.rb +0 -51
- data/spec/auth/session_manager_spec.rb +0 -172
- data/spec/auth/session_spec.rb +0 -112
- data/spec/auth/user_spec.rb +0 -130
- data/spec/comprehensive_edge_cases_spec.rb +0 -1777
- data/spec/context_spec.rb +0 -127
- data/spec/decision_agent_spec.rb +0 -96
- data/spec/decision_spec.rb +0 -423
- data/spec/dsl/condition_evaluator_spec.rb +0 -774
- data/spec/dsl_validation_spec.rb +0 -648
- data/spec/edge_cases_spec.rb +0 -353
- data/spec/evaluation_spec.rb +0 -364
- data/spec/evaluation_validator_spec.rb +0 -165
- data/spec/examples/feedback_aware_evaluator_spec.rb +0 -460
- data/spec/examples.txt +0 -1633
- data/spec/issue_verification_spec.rb +0 -759
- data/spec/json_rule_evaluator_spec.rb +0 -587
- data/spec/monitoring/alert_manager_spec.rb +0 -378
- data/spec/monitoring/metrics_collector_spec.rb +0 -499
- data/spec/monitoring/monitored_agent_spec.rb +0 -222
- data/spec/monitoring/prometheus_exporter_spec.rb +0 -242
- data/spec/monitoring/storage/activerecord_adapter_spec.rb +0 -498
- data/spec/monitoring/storage/base_adapter_spec.rb +0 -61
- data/spec/monitoring/storage/memory_adapter_spec.rb +0 -247
- data/spec/performance_optimizations_spec.rb +0 -486
- data/spec/replay_edge_cases_spec.rb +0 -699
- data/spec/replay_spec.rb +0 -210
- data/spec/rfc8785_canonicalization_spec.rb +0 -215
- data/spec/scoring_spec.rb +0 -225
- data/spec/spec_helper.rb +0 -60
- data/spec/testing/batch_test_importer_spec.rb +0 -693
- data/spec/testing/batch_test_runner_spec.rb +0 -307
- data/spec/testing/test_coverage_analyzer_spec.rb +0 -292
- data/spec/testing/test_result_comparator_spec.rb +0 -392
- data/spec/testing/test_scenario_spec.rb +0 -113
- data/spec/thread_safety_spec.rb +0 -482
- data/spec/thread_safety_spec.rb.broken +0 -878
- data/spec/versioning/adapter_spec.rb +0 -156
- data/spec/versioning_spec.rb +0 -1030
- data/spec/web/middleware/auth_middleware_spec.rb +0 -133
- data/spec/web/middleware/permission_middleware_spec.rb +0 -247
- data/spec/web_ui_rack_spec.rb +0 -1840
data/spec/context_spec.rb
DELETED
|
@@ -1,127 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
require "spec_helper"
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
RSpec.describe DecisionAgent::Context do
|
|
4
|
-
describe "#initialize" do
|
|
5
|
-
it "accepts a hash and freezes it" do
|
|
6
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ user: "alice" })
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
expect(context.to_h).to eq({ user: "alice" })
|
|
9
|
-
expect(context.to_h).to be_frozen
|
|
10
|
-
end
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
it "converts non-hash to empty hash" do
|
|
13
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new("not a hash")
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
expect(context.to_h).to eq({})
|
|
16
|
-
end
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
it "deep freezes nested hashes" do
|
|
19
|
-
data = { user: { name: "alice", roles: ["admin"] } }
|
|
20
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new(data)
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
expect(context.to_h[:user]).to be_frozen
|
|
23
|
-
expect(context.to_h[:user][:roles]).to be_frozen
|
|
24
|
-
end
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
it "creates a copy before freezing to avoid mutating original data" do
|
|
27
|
-
original_data = { user: { name: "alice", roles: ["admin"] } }
|
|
28
|
-
original_data_id = original_data.object_id
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new(original_data)
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
# Should create a copy (different object_id) to avoid mutating original
|
|
33
|
-
expect(context.to_h.object_id).not_to eq(original_data_id)
|
|
34
|
-
expect(context.to_h).to be_frozen
|
|
35
|
-
expect(context.to_h[:user]).to be_frozen
|
|
36
|
-
# Original data should not be frozen
|
|
37
|
-
expect(original_data).not_to be_frozen
|
|
38
|
-
end
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
it "skips already frozen objects in deep_freeze" do
|
|
41
|
-
frozen_data = { user: { name: "alice", roles: ["admin"] } }
|
|
42
|
-
frozen_data.freeze
|
|
43
|
-
frozen_data[:user].freeze
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new(frozen_data)
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
expect(context.to_h).to be_frozen
|
|
48
|
-
expect(context.to_h[:user]).to be_frozen
|
|
49
|
-
end
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
it "does not freeze hash keys unnecessarily" do
|
|
52
|
-
key_symbol = :test_key
|
|
53
|
-
key_string = "test_key"
|
|
54
|
-
data = {
|
|
55
|
-
key_symbol => "value1",
|
|
56
|
-
key_string => "value2"
|
|
57
|
-
}
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new(data)
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
# Keys should not be frozen (they're typically symbols/strings that don't need freezing)
|
|
62
|
-
expect(context.to_h.keys.first).to eq(key_symbol)
|
|
63
|
-
expect(context.to_h.keys.last).to eq(key_string)
|
|
64
|
-
# Values should be frozen
|
|
65
|
-
expect(context.to_h[key_symbol]).to be_frozen
|
|
66
|
-
expect(context.to_h[key_string]).to be_frozen
|
|
67
|
-
end
|
|
68
|
-
end
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
describe "#[]" do
|
|
71
|
-
it "retrieves values by key" do
|
|
72
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ status: "active" })
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
expect(context[:status]).to eq("active")
|
|
75
|
-
end
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
it "returns nil for missing keys" do
|
|
78
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({})
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
expect(context[:missing]).to be_nil
|
|
81
|
-
end
|
|
82
|
-
end
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
describe "#fetch" do
|
|
85
|
-
it "retrieves values by key" do
|
|
86
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ priority: "high" })
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
expect(context.fetch(:priority)).to eq("high")
|
|
89
|
-
end
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
it "returns default for missing keys" do
|
|
92
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({})
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
expect(context.fetch(:missing, "default")).to eq("default")
|
|
95
|
-
end
|
|
96
|
-
end
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
describe "#key?" do
|
|
99
|
-
it "returns true when key exists" do
|
|
100
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ user: "alice" })
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
expect(context.key?(:user)).to be true
|
|
103
|
-
end
|
|
104
|
-
|
|
105
|
-
it "returns false when key does not exist" do
|
|
106
|
-
context = DecisionAgent::Context.new({})
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
expect(context.key?(:user)).to be false
|
|
109
|
-
end
|
|
110
|
-
end
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
describe "#==" do
|
|
113
|
-
it "compares contexts by data equality" do
|
|
114
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ user: "alice" })
|
|
115
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ user: "alice" })
|
|
116
|
-
|
|
117
|
-
expect(context1).to eq(context2)
|
|
118
|
-
end
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
120
|
-
it "returns false for different data" do
|
|
121
|
-
context1 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ user: "alice" })
|
|
122
|
-
context2 = DecisionAgent::Context.new({ user: "bob" })
|
|
123
|
-
|
|
124
|
-
expect(context1).not_to eq(context2)
|
|
125
|
-
end
|
|
126
|
-
end
|
|
127
|
-
end
|
data/spec/decision_agent_spec.rb
DELETED
|
@@ -1,96 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
require "spec_helper"
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
RSpec.describe DecisionAgent do
|
|
4
|
-
before do
|
|
5
|
-
# Reset permission_checker between tests to avoid leakage
|
|
6
|
-
DecisionAgent.permission_checker = nil
|
|
7
|
-
end
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
describe ".rbac_config" do
|
|
10
|
-
it "returns the global RBAC configuration" do
|
|
11
|
-
expect(DecisionAgent.rbac_config).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Auth::RbacConfig)
|
|
12
|
-
end
|
|
13
|
-
end
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
describe ".configure_rbac" do
|
|
16
|
-
context "with adapter_type and options" do
|
|
17
|
-
it "configures RBAC with adapter type" do
|
|
18
|
-
result = DecisionAgent.configure_rbac(:default)
|
|
19
|
-
expect(result).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Auth::RbacConfig)
|
|
20
|
-
expect(DecisionAgent.rbac_config.adapter).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Auth::RbacAdapter)
|
|
21
|
-
end
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
it "configures RBAC with custom options" do
|
|
24
|
-
result = DecisionAgent.configure_rbac(:custom,
|
|
25
|
-
can_proc: ->(_user, _permission, _resource) { true },
|
|
26
|
-
has_role_proc: ->(_user, _role) { false },
|
|
27
|
-
active_proc: ->(_user) { true })
|
|
28
|
-
expect(result).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Auth::RbacConfig)
|
|
29
|
-
end
|
|
30
|
-
end
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
context "with block" do
|
|
33
|
-
it "yields the config block" do
|
|
34
|
-
# Now test setting a custom adapter via block
|
|
35
|
-
custom_adapter = DecisionAgent::Auth::DefaultAdapter.new
|
|
36
|
-
result = DecisionAgent.configure_rbac do |config|
|
|
37
|
-
config.adapter = custom_adapter
|
|
38
|
-
end
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
expect(result).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Auth::RbacConfig)
|
|
41
|
-
expect(DecisionAgent.rbac_config.adapter).to eq(custom_adapter)
|
|
42
|
-
end
|
|
43
|
-
end
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
context "with no arguments" do
|
|
46
|
-
it "returns the rbac_config" do
|
|
47
|
-
result = DecisionAgent.configure_rbac
|
|
48
|
-
expect(result).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Auth::RbacConfig)
|
|
49
|
-
end
|
|
50
|
-
end
|
|
51
|
-
end
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
describe ".permission_checker" do
|
|
54
|
-
it "returns a PermissionChecker instance" do
|
|
55
|
-
checker = DecisionAgent.permission_checker
|
|
56
|
-
expect(checker).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Auth::PermissionChecker)
|
|
57
|
-
end
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
it "creates a new PermissionChecker if not set" do
|
|
60
|
-
# Reset permission_checker
|
|
61
|
-
DecisionAgent.permission_checker = nil
|
|
62
|
-
checker = DecisionAgent.permission_checker
|
|
63
|
-
expect(checker).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Auth::PermissionChecker)
|
|
64
|
-
end
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
it "returns the same instance on subsequent calls" do
|
|
67
|
-
checker1 = DecisionAgent.permission_checker
|
|
68
|
-
checker2 = DecisionAgent.permission_checker
|
|
69
|
-
expect(checker1).to eq(checker2)
|
|
70
|
-
end
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
it "uses the rbac_config adapter" do
|
|
73
|
-
DecisionAgent.configure_rbac(:default)
|
|
74
|
-
checker = DecisionAgent.permission_checker
|
|
75
|
-
adapter = checker.instance_variable_get(:@adapter)
|
|
76
|
-
expect(adapter).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Auth::RbacAdapter)
|
|
77
|
-
expect(DecisionAgent.rbac_config.adapter).to be_a(DecisionAgent::Auth::RbacAdapter)
|
|
78
|
-
end
|
|
79
|
-
end
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
describe ".permission_checker=" do
|
|
82
|
-
it "sets a custom permission checker" do
|
|
83
|
-
custom_checker = double("CustomChecker")
|
|
84
|
-
DecisionAgent.permission_checker = custom_checker
|
|
85
|
-
expect(DecisionAgent.permission_checker).to eq(custom_checker)
|
|
86
|
-
end
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
it "overrides the default permission checker" do
|
|
89
|
-
original_checker = DecisionAgent.permission_checker
|
|
90
|
-
custom_checker = double("CustomChecker")
|
|
91
|
-
DecisionAgent.permission_checker = custom_checker
|
|
92
|
-
expect(DecisionAgent.permission_checker).not_to eq(original_checker)
|
|
93
|
-
expect(DecisionAgent.permission_checker).to eq(custom_checker)
|
|
94
|
-
end
|
|
95
|
-
end
|
|
96
|
-
end
|
data/spec/decision_spec.rb
DELETED
|
@@ -1,423 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
require "spec_helper"
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
RSpec.describe DecisionAgent::Decision do
|
|
4
|
-
let(:evaluation) do
|
|
5
|
-
DecisionAgent::Evaluation.new(
|
|
6
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
7
|
-
weight: 0.8,
|
|
8
|
-
reason: "Test reason",
|
|
9
|
-
evaluator_name: "TestEvaluator"
|
|
10
|
-
)
|
|
11
|
-
end
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
let(:audit_payload) do
|
|
14
|
-
{
|
|
15
|
-
timestamp: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
|
|
16
|
-
context: { user: "test" },
|
|
17
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
18
|
-
confidence: 0.8
|
|
19
|
-
}
|
|
20
|
-
end
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
describe "#initialize" do
|
|
23
|
-
it "creates a decision with all required fields" do
|
|
24
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
25
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
26
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
27
|
-
explanations: ["Test explanation"],
|
|
28
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
29
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
30
|
-
)
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
expect(decision.decision).to eq("approve")
|
|
33
|
-
expect(decision.confidence).to eq(0.8)
|
|
34
|
-
expect(decision.explanations).to eq(["Test explanation"])
|
|
35
|
-
expect(decision.evaluations).to eq([evaluation])
|
|
36
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload).to eq(audit_payload)
|
|
37
|
-
end
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
it "converts decision to string" do
|
|
40
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
41
|
-
decision: :approve,
|
|
42
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
43
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
44
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
45
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
46
|
-
)
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
expect(decision.decision).to eq("approve")
|
|
49
|
-
end
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
it "converts confidence to float" do
|
|
52
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
53
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
54
|
-
confidence: "0.8",
|
|
55
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
56
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
57
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
58
|
-
)
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
expect(decision.confidence).to eq(0.8)
|
|
61
|
-
end
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
it "freezes the decision object" do
|
|
64
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
65
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
66
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
67
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
68
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
69
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
70
|
-
)
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
expect(decision).to be_frozen
|
|
73
|
-
end
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
it "freezes nested structures" do
|
|
76
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
77
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
78
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
79
|
-
explanations: ["explanation"],
|
|
80
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
81
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
82
|
-
)
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
expect(decision.decision).to be_frozen
|
|
85
|
-
expect(decision.explanations).to be_frozen
|
|
86
|
-
expect(decision.explanations.first).to be_frozen
|
|
87
|
-
expect(decision.evaluations).to be_frozen
|
|
88
|
-
end
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
it "deep freezes audit payload" do
|
|
91
|
-
nested_payload = {
|
|
92
|
-
context: { user: { name: "test" } },
|
|
93
|
-
metadata: [1, 2, 3]
|
|
94
|
-
}
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
97
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
98
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
99
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
100
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
101
|
-
audit_payload: nested_payload
|
|
102
|
-
)
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload).to be_frozen
|
|
105
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload[:context]).to be_frozen
|
|
106
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload[:context][:user]).to be_frozen
|
|
107
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload[:metadata]).to be_frozen
|
|
108
|
-
end
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
it "freezes audit payload in-place without creating new objects" do
|
|
111
|
-
original_payload = {
|
|
112
|
-
context: { user: "test" },
|
|
113
|
-
metadata: [1, 2, 3]
|
|
114
|
-
}
|
|
115
|
-
original_payload_id = original_payload.object_id
|
|
116
|
-
original_context_id = original_payload[:context].object_id
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
119
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
120
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
121
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
122
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
123
|
-
audit_payload: original_payload
|
|
124
|
-
)
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
126
|
-
# Should freeze in-place, not create new objects
|
|
127
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload.object_id).to eq(original_payload_id)
|
|
128
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload[:context].object_id).to eq(original_context_id)
|
|
129
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload).to be_frozen
|
|
130
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload[:context]).to be_frozen
|
|
131
|
-
end
|
|
132
|
-
|
|
133
|
-
it "skips already frozen objects in deep_freeze" do
|
|
134
|
-
frozen_payload = {
|
|
135
|
-
context: { user: "test" }
|
|
136
|
-
}
|
|
137
|
-
frozen_payload.freeze
|
|
138
|
-
frozen_payload[:context].freeze
|
|
139
|
-
|
|
140
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
141
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
142
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
143
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
144
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
145
|
-
audit_payload: frozen_payload
|
|
146
|
-
)
|
|
147
|
-
|
|
148
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload).to be_frozen
|
|
149
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload[:context]).to be_frozen
|
|
150
|
-
end
|
|
151
|
-
|
|
152
|
-
it "does not freeze hash keys unnecessarily" do
|
|
153
|
-
key_symbol = :test_key
|
|
154
|
-
key_string = "test_key"
|
|
155
|
-
payload = {
|
|
156
|
-
key_symbol => "value1",
|
|
157
|
-
key_string => "value2"
|
|
158
|
-
}
|
|
159
|
-
|
|
160
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
161
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
162
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
163
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
164
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
165
|
-
audit_payload: payload
|
|
166
|
-
)
|
|
167
|
-
|
|
168
|
-
# Keys should not be frozen (they're typically symbols/strings that don't need freezing)
|
|
169
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload.keys.first).to eq(key_symbol)
|
|
170
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload.keys.last).to eq(key_string)
|
|
171
|
-
# Values should be frozen
|
|
172
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload[key_symbol]).to be_frozen
|
|
173
|
-
expect(decision.audit_payload[key_string]).to be_frozen
|
|
174
|
-
end
|
|
175
|
-
|
|
176
|
-
it "raises error for confidence outside 0-1 range" do
|
|
177
|
-
expect do
|
|
178
|
-
described_class.new(
|
|
179
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
180
|
-
confidence: 1.5,
|
|
181
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
182
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
183
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
184
|
-
)
|
|
185
|
-
end.to raise_error(DecisionAgent::InvalidConfidenceError)
|
|
186
|
-
end
|
|
187
|
-
|
|
188
|
-
it "raises error for negative confidence" do
|
|
189
|
-
expect do
|
|
190
|
-
described_class.new(
|
|
191
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
192
|
-
confidence: -0.1,
|
|
193
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
194
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
195
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
196
|
-
)
|
|
197
|
-
end.to raise_error(DecisionAgent::InvalidConfidenceError)
|
|
198
|
-
end
|
|
199
|
-
|
|
200
|
-
it "accepts confidence at boundaries" do
|
|
201
|
-
decision1 = described_class.new(
|
|
202
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
203
|
-
confidence: 0.0,
|
|
204
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
205
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
206
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
207
|
-
)
|
|
208
|
-
expect(decision1.confidence).to eq(0.0)
|
|
209
|
-
|
|
210
|
-
decision2 = described_class.new(
|
|
211
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
212
|
-
confidence: 1.0,
|
|
213
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
214
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
215
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
216
|
-
)
|
|
217
|
-
expect(decision2.confidence).to eq(1.0)
|
|
218
|
-
end
|
|
219
|
-
|
|
220
|
-
it "handles array explanations" do
|
|
221
|
-
explanations = %w[explanation1 explanation2]
|
|
222
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
223
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
224
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
225
|
-
explanations: explanations,
|
|
226
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
227
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
228
|
-
)
|
|
229
|
-
|
|
230
|
-
expect(decision.explanations).to eq(explanations)
|
|
231
|
-
end
|
|
232
|
-
|
|
233
|
-
it "converts non-array explanations to array" do
|
|
234
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
235
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
236
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
237
|
-
explanations: "single explanation",
|
|
238
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
239
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
240
|
-
)
|
|
241
|
-
|
|
242
|
-
expect(decision.explanations).to eq(["single explanation"])
|
|
243
|
-
end
|
|
244
|
-
end
|
|
245
|
-
|
|
246
|
-
describe "#to_h" do
|
|
247
|
-
it "converts decision to hash" do
|
|
248
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
249
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
250
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
251
|
-
explanations: ["explanation"],
|
|
252
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
253
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
254
|
-
)
|
|
255
|
-
|
|
256
|
-
hash = decision.to_h
|
|
257
|
-
|
|
258
|
-
expect(hash).to be_a(Hash)
|
|
259
|
-
expect(hash[:decision]).to eq("approve")
|
|
260
|
-
expect(hash[:confidence]).to eq(0.8)
|
|
261
|
-
expect(hash[:explanations]).to eq(["explanation"])
|
|
262
|
-
expect(hash[:evaluations]).to be_an(Array)
|
|
263
|
-
expect(hash[:evaluations].first).to be_a(Hash)
|
|
264
|
-
expect(hash[:audit_payload]).to eq(audit_payload)
|
|
265
|
-
end
|
|
266
|
-
|
|
267
|
-
it "converts evaluations to hashes" do
|
|
268
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
269
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
270
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
271
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
272
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
273
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
274
|
-
)
|
|
275
|
-
|
|
276
|
-
hash = decision.to_h
|
|
277
|
-
expect(hash[:evaluations].first[:decision]).to eq("approve")
|
|
278
|
-
expect(hash[:evaluations].first[:weight]).to eq(0.8)
|
|
279
|
-
end
|
|
280
|
-
end
|
|
281
|
-
|
|
282
|
-
describe "#==" do
|
|
283
|
-
it "compares decisions by all fields" do
|
|
284
|
-
decision1 = described_class.new(
|
|
285
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
286
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
287
|
-
explanations: ["explanation"],
|
|
288
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
289
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
290
|
-
)
|
|
291
|
-
|
|
292
|
-
decision2 = described_class.new(
|
|
293
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
294
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
295
|
-
explanations: ["explanation"],
|
|
296
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
297
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
298
|
-
)
|
|
299
|
-
|
|
300
|
-
expect(decision1).to eq(decision2)
|
|
301
|
-
end
|
|
302
|
-
|
|
303
|
-
it "returns false for different decisions" do
|
|
304
|
-
decision1 = described_class.new(
|
|
305
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
306
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
307
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
308
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
309
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
310
|
-
)
|
|
311
|
-
|
|
312
|
-
decision2 = described_class.new(
|
|
313
|
-
decision: "reject",
|
|
314
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
315
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
316
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
317
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
318
|
-
)
|
|
319
|
-
|
|
320
|
-
expect(decision1).not_to eq(decision2)
|
|
321
|
-
end
|
|
322
|
-
|
|
323
|
-
it "returns false for different confidences" do
|
|
324
|
-
decision1 = described_class.new(
|
|
325
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
326
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
327
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
328
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
329
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
330
|
-
)
|
|
331
|
-
|
|
332
|
-
decision2 = described_class.new(
|
|
333
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
334
|
-
confidence: 0.9,
|
|
335
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
336
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
337
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
338
|
-
)
|
|
339
|
-
|
|
340
|
-
expect(decision1).not_to eq(decision2)
|
|
341
|
-
end
|
|
342
|
-
|
|
343
|
-
it "allows small confidence differences" do
|
|
344
|
-
decision1 = described_class.new(
|
|
345
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
346
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
347
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
348
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
349
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
350
|
-
)
|
|
351
|
-
|
|
352
|
-
decision2 = described_class.new(
|
|
353
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
354
|
-
confidence: 0.8000001,
|
|
355
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
356
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
357
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
358
|
-
)
|
|
359
|
-
|
|
360
|
-
expect(decision1).to eq(decision2)
|
|
361
|
-
end
|
|
362
|
-
|
|
363
|
-
it "returns false for different explanations" do
|
|
364
|
-
decision1 = described_class.new(
|
|
365
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
366
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
367
|
-
explanations: ["explanation1"],
|
|
368
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
369
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
370
|
-
)
|
|
371
|
-
|
|
372
|
-
decision2 = described_class.new(
|
|
373
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
374
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
375
|
-
explanations: ["explanation2"],
|
|
376
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
377
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
378
|
-
)
|
|
379
|
-
|
|
380
|
-
expect(decision1).not_to eq(decision2)
|
|
381
|
-
end
|
|
382
|
-
|
|
383
|
-
it "returns false for different evaluations" do
|
|
384
|
-
eval2 = DecisionAgent::Evaluation.new(
|
|
385
|
-
decision: "reject",
|
|
386
|
-
weight: 0.9,
|
|
387
|
-
reason: "Different reason",
|
|
388
|
-
evaluator_name: "OtherEvaluator"
|
|
389
|
-
)
|
|
390
|
-
|
|
391
|
-
decision1 = described_class.new(
|
|
392
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
393
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
394
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
395
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
396
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
397
|
-
)
|
|
398
|
-
|
|
399
|
-
decision2 = described_class.new(
|
|
400
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
401
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
402
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
403
|
-
evaluations: [eval2],
|
|
404
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
405
|
-
)
|
|
406
|
-
|
|
407
|
-
expect(decision1).not_to eq(decision2)
|
|
408
|
-
end
|
|
409
|
-
|
|
410
|
-
it "returns false for non-Decision objects" do
|
|
411
|
-
decision = described_class.new(
|
|
412
|
-
decision: "approve",
|
|
413
|
-
confidence: 0.8,
|
|
414
|
-
explanations: [],
|
|
415
|
-
evaluations: [evaluation],
|
|
416
|
-
audit_payload: audit_payload
|
|
417
|
-
)
|
|
418
|
-
|
|
419
|
-
expect(decision).not_to eq("not a decision")
|
|
420
|
-
expect(decision).not_to eq(nil)
|
|
421
|
-
end
|
|
422
|
-
end
|
|
423
|
-
end
|