cuke_modeler 0.0.2 → 0.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- data/.travis.yml +23 -0
- data/Gemfile +22 -4
- data/History.rdoc +6 -0
- data/Rakefile +26 -26
- data/cuke_modeler.gemspec +3 -1
- data/features/modeling/{background_modeling.feature → gherkin/background_modeling.feature} +1 -11
- data/features/modeling/{background_output.feature → gherkin/background_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/{directory_modeling.feature → gherkin/directory_modeling.feature} +1 -11
- data/features/modeling/{directory_output.feature → gherkin/directory_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/{doc_string_modeling.feature → gherkin/doc_string_modeling.feature} +1 -11
- data/features/modeling/{doc_string_output.feature → gherkin/doc_string_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/{example_modeling.feature → gherkin/example_modeling.feature} +1 -11
- data/features/modeling/{example_output.feature → gherkin/example_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/{feature_file_modeling.feature → gherkin/feature_file_modeling.feature} +1 -11
- data/features/modeling/{feature_file_output.feature → gherkin/feature_file_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/{feature_modeling.feature → gherkin/feature_modeling.feature} +1 -11
- data/features/modeling/{feature_output.feature → gherkin/feature_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/{outline_modeling.feature → gherkin/outline_modeling.feature} +1 -11
- data/features/modeling/{outline_output.feature → gherkin/outline_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/{row_modeling.feature → gherkin/row_modeling.feature} +1 -10
- data/features/modeling/{row_output.feature → gherkin/row_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/{scenario_modeling.feature → gherkin/scenario_modeling.feature} +1 -11
- data/features/modeling/{scenario_output.feature → gherkin/scenario_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/{step_modeling.feature → gherkin/step_modeling.feature} +1 -11
- data/features/modeling/{step_output.feature → gherkin/step_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/{table_modeling.feature → gherkin/table_modeling.feature} +1 -11
- data/features/modeling/{table_output.feature → gherkin/table_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/{table_row_modeling.feature → gherkin/table_row_modeling.feature} +1 -11
- data/features/modeling/{table_row_output.feature → gherkin/table_row_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/{tag_modeling.feature → gherkin/tag_modeling.feature} +1 -11
- data/features/modeling/{tag_output.feature → gherkin/tag_output.feature} +1 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/background_modeling.feature +64 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/background_output.feature +131 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/directory_modeling.feature +110 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/directory_output.feature +14 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/doc_string_modeling.feature +53 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/doc_string_output.feature +72 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/example_modeling.feature +100 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/example_output.feature +207 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/feature_file_modeling.feature +54 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/feature_file_output.feature +14 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/feature_modeling.feature +155 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/feature_output.feature +249 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/outline_modeling.feature +89 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/outline_output.feature +255 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/row_modeling.feature +68 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/row_output.feature +28 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/scenario_modeling.feature +78 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/scenario_output.feature +148 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/step_modeling.feature +75 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/step_output.feature +53 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/table_modeling.feature +42 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/table_output.feature +43 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/table_row_modeling.feature +57 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/table_row_output.feature +28 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/tag_modeling.feature +49 -0
- data/features/modeling/gherkin3/tag_output.feature +17 -0
- data/features/step_definitions/background_steps.rb +5 -1
- data/features/step_definitions/doc_string_steps.rb +5 -1
- data/features/step_definitions/feature_steps.rb +5 -1
- data/features/step_definitions/outline_steps.rb +10 -4
- data/features/step_definitions/step_steps.rb +10 -2
- data/features/step_definitions/table_steps.rb +6 -2
- data/features/step_definitions/tag_steps.rb +15 -3
- data/features/step_definitions/test_steps.rb +7 -2
- data/features/support/env.rb +21 -9
- data/gemfiles/gherkin.gemfile +17 -0
- data/gemfiles/gherkin3.gemfile +15 -0
- data/lib/cuke_modeler/adapters/gherkin_2_adapter.rb +146 -0
- data/lib/cuke_modeler/adapters/gherkin_3_adapter.rb +206 -0
- data/lib/cuke_modeler/parsing.rb +61 -20
- data/lib/cuke_modeler/raw.rb +1 -1
- data/lib/cuke_modeler/row.rb +2 -2
- data/lib/cuke_modeler/table.rb +2 -2
- data/lib/cuke_modeler/table_row.rb +1 -1
- data/lib/cuke_modeler/version.rb +1 -1
- data/spec/integration/example_integration_spec.rb +2 -1
- data/spec/integration/feature_integration_spec.rb +7 -4
- data/spec/integration/outline_integration_spec.rb +4 -2
- data/spec/integration/tag_integration_spec.rb +2 -1
- data/spec/spec_helper.rb +6 -0
- data/spec/unit/background_unit_spec.rb +17 -0
- data/spec/unit/doc_string_unit_spec.rb +17 -0
- data/spec/unit/example_unit_spec.rb +18 -1
- data/spec/unit/feature_file_unit_spec.rb +2 -2
- data/spec/unit/feature_unit_spec.rb +16 -0
- data/spec/unit/outline_unit_spec.rb +20 -1
- data/spec/unit/row_unit_spec.rb +18 -0
- data/spec/unit/scenario_unit_spec.rb +17 -0
- data/spec/unit/step_unit_spec.rb +17 -0
- data/spec/unit/table_row_unit_spec.rb +18 -0
- data/spec/unit/table_unit_spec.rb +16 -0
- data/spec/unit/tag_unit_spec.rb +17 -0
- metadata +147 -60
- data/features/step_definitions/spec_steps.rb +0 -18
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
|
|
1
|
+
@gherkin3
|
2
|
+
Feature: Example elements can be modeled.
|
3
|
+
|
4
|
+
|
5
|
+
Acceptance criteria
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
1. All conceptual pieces of an example block can be modeled:
|
8
|
+
- the example's name
|
9
|
+
- the example's description
|
10
|
+
- the example's parameters
|
11
|
+
- the example's rows
|
12
|
+
- the example's tags
|
13
|
+
- the example's applied tags
|
14
|
+
- the example's source line
|
15
|
+
- the example's raw element
|
16
|
+
|
17
|
+
2. Example blocks can be outputted in a convenient form
|
18
|
+
|
19
|
+
|
20
|
+
Background: Test file setup.
|
21
|
+
Given the following feature file:
|
22
|
+
"""
|
23
|
+
@a_feature_level_tag
|
24
|
+
Feature:
|
25
|
+
|
26
|
+
@outline_tag
|
27
|
+
Scenario Outline:
|
28
|
+
* a step
|
29
|
+
|
30
|
+
Examples: text describing the significance of the examples
|
31
|
+
|
32
|
+
Some example description.
|
33
|
+
|
34
|
+
Some more.
|
35
|
+
Even more.
|
36
|
+
|param1| param2 | extra param |
|
37
|
+
|x | y | ? |
|
38
|
+
|1 | 2 | 3 |
|
39
|
+
@example_tag @another_one
|
40
|
+
Examples: some examples with different significance and a tag
|
41
|
+
| param1 |
|
42
|
+
| a |
|
43
|
+
"""
|
44
|
+
And parameter delimiters of "*" and "*"
|
45
|
+
When the file is read
|
46
|
+
|
47
|
+
|
48
|
+
Scenario: The raw example element is modeled.
|
49
|
+
Then the test example block correctly stores its underlying implementation
|
50
|
+
|
51
|
+
Scenario: The example's source line is modeled.
|
52
|
+
Then the test example block "1" is found to have the following properties:
|
53
|
+
| source_line | 8 |
|
54
|
+
And the test example block "2" is found to have the following properties:
|
55
|
+
| source_line | 18 |
|
56
|
+
|
57
|
+
Scenario: The examples' name is modeled.
|
58
|
+
Then the test example block "1" is found to have the following properties:
|
59
|
+
| name | text describing the significance of the examples |
|
60
|
+
And the test example block "2" is found to have the following properties:
|
61
|
+
| name | some examples with different significance and a tag |
|
62
|
+
|
63
|
+
Scenario: The examples' description is modeled.
|
64
|
+
Then the test example block "1" has the following description:
|
65
|
+
"""
|
66
|
+
Some example description.
|
67
|
+
|
68
|
+
Some more.
|
69
|
+
Even more.
|
70
|
+
"""
|
71
|
+
And the test example block "2" has no description
|
72
|
+
|
73
|
+
Scenario: The examples' tags are modeled.
|
74
|
+
Then the test example block "1" has no tags
|
75
|
+
And the test example block "2" is found to have the following tags:
|
76
|
+
| @example_tag |
|
77
|
+
| @another_one |
|
78
|
+
|
79
|
+
Scenario: The examples' applied tags are modeled.
|
80
|
+
Then the test example block "2" is found to have the following applied tags:
|
81
|
+
| @a_feature_level_tag |
|
82
|
+
| @outline_tag |
|
83
|
+
|
84
|
+
Scenario: The examples' parameters are modeled.
|
85
|
+
Then the test example block "1" parameters are as follows:
|
86
|
+
| param1 |
|
87
|
+
| param2 |
|
88
|
+
| extra param |
|
89
|
+
And the test example block "2" parameters are as follows:
|
90
|
+
| param1 |
|
91
|
+
|
92
|
+
Scenario: The examples' rows are modeled.
|
93
|
+
Then the test example block "1" rows are as follows:
|
94
|
+
| x,y,? |
|
95
|
+
| 1,2,3 |
|
96
|
+
And the test example block "2" rows are as follows:
|
97
|
+
| a |
|
98
|
+
|
99
|
+
Scenario: Convenient output of an example block
|
100
|
+
Then the example block has convenient output
|
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
|
|
1
|
+
@gherkin3
|
2
|
+
Feature: Outputting example elements
|
3
|
+
|
4
|
+
The output of an element model is a representation of the element as it would
|
5
|
+
appear in gherkin.
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
|
8
|
+
Scenario: Output of an example that does not have a name
|
9
|
+
Given an example element based on the following gherkin:
|
10
|
+
"""
|
11
|
+
Examples:
|
12
|
+
|param|
|
13
|
+
|value|
|
14
|
+
"""
|
15
|
+
When it is outputted
|
16
|
+
Then the following text is provided:
|
17
|
+
"""
|
18
|
+
Examples:
|
19
|
+
| param |
|
20
|
+
| value |
|
21
|
+
"""
|
22
|
+
|
23
|
+
Scenario: Output of an example that does have a name
|
24
|
+
Given an example element based on the following gherkin:
|
25
|
+
"""
|
26
|
+
Examples: with a name
|
27
|
+
|param|
|
28
|
+
|value|
|
29
|
+
"""
|
30
|
+
When it is outputted
|
31
|
+
Then the following text is provided:
|
32
|
+
"""
|
33
|
+
Examples: with a name
|
34
|
+
| param |
|
35
|
+
| value |
|
36
|
+
"""
|
37
|
+
|
38
|
+
Scenario: Output of an example that does not have tags
|
39
|
+
Given an example element based on the following gherkin:
|
40
|
+
"""
|
41
|
+
Examples:
|
42
|
+
|param|
|
43
|
+
|value|
|
44
|
+
"""
|
45
|
+
When it is outputted
|
46
|
+
Then the following text is provided:
|
47
|
+
"""
|
48
|
+
Examples:
|
49
|
+
| param |
|
50
|
+
| value |
|
51
|
+
"""
|
52
|
+
|
53
|
+
Scenario: Output of an example that does have tags
|
54
|
+
Given an example element based on the following gherkin:
|
55
|
+
"""
|
56
|
+
@tag1@tag2
|
57
|
+
@tag3
|
58
|
+
Examples:
|
59
|
+
|param|
|
60
|
+
|value|
|
61
|
+
"""
|
62
|
+
When it is outputted
|
63
|
+
Then the following text is provided:
|
64
|
+
"""
|
65
|
+
@tag1 @tag2 @tag3
|
66
|
+
Examples:
|
67
|
+
| param |
|
68
|
+
| value |
|
69
|
+
"""
|
70
|
+
|
71
|
+
Scenario: Output of an example that has a description, no first line buffer
|
72
|
+
Given an example element based on the following gherkin:
|
73
|
+
"""
|
74
|
+
Examples:
|
75
|
+
Some description.
|
76
|
+
Some more description.
|
77
|
+
|param|
|
78
|
+
|value|
|
79
|
+
"""
|
80
|
+
When it is outputted
|
81
|
+
Then the following text is provided:
|
82
|
+
"""
|
83
|
+
Examples:
|
84
|
+
|
85
|
+
Some description.
|
86
|
+
Some more description.
|
87
|
+
|
88
|
+
| param |
|
89
|
+
| value |
|
90
|
+
"""
|
91
|
+
|
92
|
+
Scenario: Output of an example that has a description, first line is blank
|
93
|
+
Given an example element based on the following gherkin:
|
94
|
+
"""
|
95
|
+
Examples:
|
96
|
+
|
97
|
+
Some description.
|
98
|
+
Some more description.
|
99
|
+
|param|
|
100
|
+
|value|
|
101
|
+
"""
|
102
|
+
When it is outputted
|
103
|
+
Then the following text is provided:
|
104
|
+
"""
|
105
|
+
Examples:
|
106
|
+
|
107
|
+
Some description.
|
108
|
+
Some more description.
|
109
|
+
|
110
|
+
| param |
|
111
|
+
| value |
|
112
|
+
"""
|
113
|
+
|
114
|
+
Scenario: Output of an example that has a description, first line is only whitespace
|
115
|
+
Given an example element based on the following gherkin:
|
116
|
+
"""
|
117
|
+
Examples:
|
118
|
+
|
119
|
+
Some description.
|
120
|
+
Some more description.
|
121
|
+
|param|
|
122
|
+
|value|
|
123
|
+
"""
|
124
|
+
When it is outputted
|
125
|
+
Then the following text is provided:
|
126
|
+
"""
|
127
|
+
Examples:
|
128
|
+
|
129
|
+
Some description.
|
130
|
+
Some more description.
|
131
|
+
|
132
|
+
| param |
|
133
|
+
| value |
|
134
|
+
"""
|
135
|
+
|
136
|
+
Scenario: Output of an example that has one rows
|
137
|
+
Given an example element based on the following gherkin:
|
138
|
+
"""
|
139
|
+
Examples:
|
140
|
+
|param1|param2|
|
141
|
+
|value1|value2|
|
142
|
+
"""
|
143
|
+
When it is outputted
|
144
|
+
Then the following text is provided:
|
145
|
+
"""
|
146
|
+
Examples:
|
147
|
+
| param1 | param2 |
|
148
|
+
| value1 | value2 |
|
149
|
+
"""
|
150
|
+
|
151
|
+
Scenario: Output of an example that has multiple rows
|
152
|
+
Given an example element based on the following gherkin:
|
153
|
+
"""
|
154
|
+
Examples:
|
155
|
+
|param1|param2|
|
156
|
+
|value1|value2|
|
157
|
+
|value3|value4|
|
158
|
+
"""
|
159
|
+
When it is outputted
|
160
|
+
Then the following text is provided:
|
161
|
+
"""
|
162
|
+
Examples:
|
163
|
+
| param1 | param2 |
|
164
|
+
| value1 | value2 |
|
165
|
+
| value3 | value4 |
|
166
|
+
"""
|
167
|
+
|
168
|
+
Scenario: Output of an example that contains all possible parts
|
169
|
+
Given an example element based on the following gherkin:
|
170
|
+
"""
|
171
|
+
@tag1@tag2
|
172
|
+
@tag3
|
173
|
+
Examples: with a name
|
174
|
+
Some description.
|
175
|
+
Some more description.
|
176
|
+
|param1|param2|
|
177
|
+
|value1|value2|
|
178
|
+
|value3|value4|
|
179
|
+
"""
|
180
|
+
When it is outputted
|
181
|
+
Then the following text is provided:
|
182
|
+
"""
|
183
|
+
@tag1 @tag2 @tag3
|
184
|
+
Examples: with a name
|
185
|
+
|
186
|
+
Some description.
|
187
|
+
Some more description.
|
188
|
+
|
189
|
+
| param1 | param2 |
|
190
|
+
| value1 | value2 |
|
191
|
+
| value3 | value4 |
|
192
|
+
"""
|
193
|
+
|
194
|
+
Scenario: Whitespace buffers are based on the longest value or parameter in a column
|
195
|
+
Given an example element based on the following gherkin:
|
196
|
+
"""
|
197
|
+
Examples:
|
198
|
+
|parameter_name|x|
|
199
|
+
|y|value_name|
|
200
|
+
"""
|
201
|
+
When it is outputted
|
202
|
+
Then the following text is provided:
|
203
|
+
"""
|
204
|
+
Examples:
|
205
|
+
| parameter_name | x |
|
206
|
+
| y | value_name |
|
207
|
+
"""
|
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
|
|
1
|
+
@gherkin3
|
2
|
+
Feature: Feature files can be modeled.
|
3
|
+
|
4
|
+
|
5
|
+
Acceptance criteria
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
1. All conceptual pieces of a .feature file can be modeled:
|
8
|
+
- the file's name
|
9
|
+
- the file's full path
|
10
|
+
- the file's features (one or zero per file)
|
11
|
+
|
12
|
+
2. Feature files can be outputted in a convenient form
|
13
|
+
|
14
|
+
|
15
|
+
Background: Test file setup.
|
16
|
+
Given the following feature file "test_file_1.feature":
|
17
|
+
"""
|
18
|
+
Feature: The first test feature
|
19
|
+
Just a dummy feature.
|
20
|
+
"""
|
21
|
+
And the following feature file "test_file_2.feature":
|
22
|
+
"""
|
23
|
+
Feature: The second test feature
|
24
|
+
Just a dummy feature.
|
25
|
+
"""
|
26
|
+
# And the following feature file "why_would_you_make_an_empty_file.feature":
|
27
|
+
# """
|
28
|
+
# """
|
29
|
+
When the file "test_file_1.feature" is read
|
30
|
+
And the file "test_file_2.feature" is read
|
31
|
+
# And the file "why_would_you_make_an_empty_file.feature" is read
|
32
|
+
|
33
|
+
|
34
|
+
Scenario: The file's feature is modeled.
|
35
|
+
Then file "1" is found to have the following properties:
|
36
|
+
| name | test_file_1.feature |
|
37
|
+
| path | path_to/test_file_1.feature |
|
38
|
+
| feature_count | 1 |
|
39
|
+
And file "1" features are as follows:
|
40
|
+
| The first test feature |
|
41
|
+
Then file "2" is found to have the following properties:
|
42
|
+
| name | test_file_2.feature |
|
43
|
+
| path | path_to/test_file_2.feature |
|
44
|
+
| feature_count | 1 |
|
45
|
+
And file "2" features are as follows:
|
46
|
+
| The second test feature |
|
47
|
+
# Then file "3" is found to have the following properties:
|
48
|
+
# | name | why_would_you_make_an_empty_file.feature |
|
49
|
+
# | path | path_to/why_would_you_make_an_empty_file.feature |
|
50
|
+
# | feature_count | 0 |
|
51
|
+
# And file "3" has no features
|
52
|
+
|
53
|
+
Scenario: Convenient output of a feature file
|
54
|
+
Then the feature file has convenient output
|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|
1
|
+
@gherkin3
|
2
|
+
Feature: Outputting feature file elements
|
3
|
+
|
4
|
+
The output of an element model is a representation of the element as it would
|
5
|
+
appear in gherkin.
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
|
8
|
+
Scenario: Output of a feature file
|
9
|
+
Given a feature file element based on "some_feature_file.feature"
|
10
|
+
When it is outputted
|
11
|
+
Then the following text is provided:
|
12
|
+
"""
|
13
|
+
path_to/some_feature_file.feature
|
14
|
+
"""
|
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
|
|
1
|
+
@gherkin3
|
2
|
+
Feature: Features can be modeled.
|
3
|
+
|
4
|
+
|
5
|
+
Acceptance criteria
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
1. All conceptual pieces of a feature can be modeled:
|
8
|
+
- the feature's name
|
9
|
+
- the feature's description
|
10
|
+
- the feature's tags
|
11
|
+
- the feature's scenarios
|
12
|
+
- the feature's outlines
|
13
|
+
- the feature's background
|
14
|
+
- the feature's total number of tests
|
15
|
+
- the feature's total number of test cases
|
16
|
+
- the feature's source line
|
17
|
+
- the feature's raw element
|
18
|
+
|
19
|
+
2. Features can be outputted in a convenient form
|
20
|
+
|
21
|
+
|
22
|
+
Background: Test file setup.
|
23
|
+
Given the following feature file "much_stuff.feature":
|
24
|
+
"""
|
25
|
+
@a_feature_level_tag @and_another
|
26
|
+
|
27
|
+
Feature: The test feature name.
|
28
|
+
|
29
|
+
Some feature description.
|
30
|
+
|
31
|
+
Some more.
|
32
|
+
And some more.
|
33
|
+
|
34
|
+
Background: Some general test setup stuff.
|
35
|
+
* some setup step
|
36
|
+
|
37
|
+
Scenario: The first scenario's name.
|
38
|
+
* a step
|
39
|
+
|
40
|
+
Scenario Outline: The scenario outline's name.
|
41
|
+
* a step
|
42
|
+
Examples:
|
43
|
+
| param |
|
44
|
+
| x |
|
45
|
+
| y |
|
46
|
+
Examples:
|
47
|
+
| param |
|
48
|
+
| z |
|
49
|
+
|
50
|
+
Scenario: The second scenario's name.
|
51
|
+
* a step
|
52
|
+
"""
|
53
|
+
And the following feature file "barely_any_stuff.feature":
|
54
|
+
"""
|
55
|
+
Feature:
|
56
|
+
|
57
|
+
Background:
|
58
|
+
|
59
|
+
Scenario:
|
60
|
+
|
61
|
+
Scenario Outline:
|
62
|
+
Examples:
|
63
|
+
| param |
|
64
|
+
| value |
|
65
|
+
"""
|
66
|
+
And the following feature file "as_empty_as_it_gets.feature":
|
67
|
+
"""
|
68
|
+
Feature:
|
69
|
+
"""
|
70
|
+
When the file "much_stuff.feature" is read
|
71
|
+
And the file "barely_any_stuff.feature" is read
|
72
|
+
And the file "as_empty_as_it_gets.feature" is read
|
73
|
+
|
74
|
+
|
75
|
+
Scenario: The raw feature element is modeled.
|
76
|
+
Then the feature correctly stores its underlying implementation
|
77
|
+
|
78
|
+
Scenario: The feature's properties are modeled.
|
79
|
+
Then feature "1" is found to have the following properties:
|
80
|
+
| name | The test feature name. |
|
81
|
+
| test_count | 3 |
|
82
|
+
| test_case_count | 5 |
|
83
|
+
| source_line | 3 |
|
84
|
+
And feature "2" is found to have the following properties:
|
85
|
+
| name | |
|
86
|
+
| test_count | 2 |
|
87
|
+
| test_case_count | 2 |
|
88
|
+
| source_line | 1 |
|
89
|
+
|
90
|
+
And feature "3" is found to have the following properties:
|
91
|
+
| name | |
|
92
|
+
| test_count | 0 |
|
93
|
+
| test_case_count | 0 |
|
94
|
+
| source_line | 1 |
|
95
|
+
|
96
|
+
Scenario: The feature's description is modeled.
|
97
|
+
Then feature "1" has the following description:
|
98
|
+
"""
|
99
|
+
Some feature description.
|
100
|
+
|
101
|
+
Some more.
|
102
|
+
And some more.
|
103
|
+
"""
|
104
|
+
And feature "2" has no description
|
105
|
+
And feature "3" has no description
|
106
|
+
|
107
|
+
Scenario: The feature's tags are modeled.
|
108
|
+
Then feature "1" is found to have the following tags:
|
109
|
+
| @a_feature_level_tag |
|
110
|
+
| @and_another |
|
111
|
+
And feature "2" has no tags
|
112
|
+
And feature "3" has no tags
|
113
|
+
|
114
|
+
Scenario: The feature's scenarios are modeled.
|
115
|
+
Then feature "1" is found to have the following properties:
|
116
|
+
| scenario_count | 2 |
|
117
|
+
And feature "1" scenarios are as follows:
|
118
|
+
| The first scenario's name. |
|
119
|
+
| The second scenario's name. |
|
120
|
+
And feature "2" is found to have the following properties:
|
121
|
+
| scenario_count | 1 |
|
122
|
+
And feature "2" scenarios are as follows:
|
123
|
+
| |
|
124
|
+
And feature "3" is found to have the following properties:
|
125
|
+
| scenario_count | 0 |
|
126
|
+
And feature "3" has no scenarios
|
127
|
+
|
128
|
+
Scenario: The feature's outlines are modeled.
|
129
|
+
Then feature "1" is found to have the following properties:
|
130
|
+
| outline_count | 1 |
|
131
|
+
And feature "1" outlines are as follows:
|
132
|
+
| The scenario outline's name. |
|
133
|
+
And feature "2" is found to have the following properties:
|
134
|
+
| outline_count | 1 |
|
135
|
+
And feature "2" outlines are as follows:
|
136
|
+
| |
|
137
|
+
And feature "3" is found to have the following properties:
|
138
|
+
| outline_count | 0 |
|
139
|
+
And feature "3" has no outlines
|
140
|
+
|
141
|
+
Scenario: The feature's background is modeled.
|
142
|
+
Then feature "1" is found to have the following properties:
|
143
|
+
| has_background? | true |
|
144
|
+
And feature "1" background is as follows:
|
145
|
+
| Some general test setup stuff. |
|
146
|
+
And feature "2" is found to have the following properties:
|
147
|
+
| has_background? | true |
|
148
|
+
And feature "2" background is as follows:
|
149
|
+
| |
|
150
|
+
And feature "3" is found to have the following properties:
|
151
|
+
| has_background? | false |
|
152
|
+
And feature "3" has no background
|
153
|
+
|
154
|
+
Scenario: Convenient output of a feature
|
155
|
+
Then the feature has convenient output
|