RubyGems - couchbase - Versions diffs - 3.5.2 → 3.5.3 - Mend

couchbase 3.5.2 → 3.5.3

Files changed (1899) hide show

data/ext/cache/boringssl/e31ea00c1ea52052d2d78d44006cc88c80fa24a9/boringssl/src/third_party/googletest/test/googletest-output-test_.cc DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,1052 +0,0 @@
-// Copyright 2005, Google Inc.
-// All rights reserved.
-//
-// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
-// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
-// met:
-//
-//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
-// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
-//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
-// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
-// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
-// distribution.
-//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
-// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
-// this software without specific prior written permission.
-//
-// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
-// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
-// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
-// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
-// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
-// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
-// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
-// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
-// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
-// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
-// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
-//
-// The purpose of this file is to generate Google Test output under
-// various conditions.  The output will then be verified by
-// googletest-output-test.py to ensure that Google Test generates the
-// desired messages.  Therefore, most tests in this file are MEANT TO
-// FAIL.
-#include <stdlib.h>
-#include <algorithm>
-#include <string>
-#include "gtest/gtest-spi.h"
-#include "gtest/gtest.h"
-#include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h"
-GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_PUSH_(4127 /* conditional expression is constant */)
-#ifdef GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
-using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter;
-using testing::TestPartResultArray;
-using testing::internal::Notification;
-using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam;
-#endif
-namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix;
-// Tests catching fatal failures.
-// A subroutine used by the following test.
-void TestEq1(int x) { ASSERT_EQ(1, x); }
-// This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it
-// generates, and then returns early.
-void TryTestSubroutine() {
-  // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
-  TestEq1(2);
-  // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
-  //
-  // The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling
-  // HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture.
-  if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return;
-  // If we get here, something is wrong.
-  FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
-}
-TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) {}
-TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) {}
-// Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the
-// failing test summary.
-class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {};
-TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) { EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam()); }
-// This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print
-// its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests.
-INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(PrintingFailingParams, FailingParamTest,
-                         testing::Values(2));
-// Tests that an empty value for the test suite basename yields just
-// the test name without any prior /
-class EmptyBasenameParamInst : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {};
-TEST_P(EmptyBasenameParamInst, Passes) { EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam()); }
-INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(, EmptyBasenameParamInst, testing::Values(1));
-static const char kGoldenString[] = "\"Line\0 1\"\nLine 2";
-TEST(NonfatalFailureTest, EscapesStringOperands) {
-  std::string actual = "actual \"string\"";
-  EXPECT_EQ(kGoldenString, actual);
-  const char* golden = kGoldenString;
-  EXPECT_EQ(golden, actual);
-}
-TEST(NonfatalFailureTest, DiffForLongStrings) {
-  std::string golden_str(kGoldenString, sizeof(kGoldenString) - 1);
-  EXPECT_EQ(golden_str, "Line 2");
-}
-// Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine.
-TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
-  TryTestSubroutine();
-}
-// Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine.
-TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
-  // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
-  TryTestSubroutine();
-  // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
-  //
-  // When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test
-  // fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed.
-  if (HasFatalFailure()) return;
-  // If we get here, something is wrong.
-  FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
-}
-// Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check.
-TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n");
-  EXPECT_TRUE(false);               // Generates a nonfatal failure
-  ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure());  // This should succeed.
-}
-// Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions.
-TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) {
-  static const int a[4] = {3, 9, 2, 6};
-  printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n");
-  for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a) / sizeof(*a)); i++) {
-    printf("i == %d\n", i);
-    EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]);
-  }
-}
-// Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro.
-// A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
-void SubWithoutTrace(int n) {
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
-  ASSERT_EQ(2, n);
-}
-// Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
-void SubWithTrace(int n) {
-  SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n);
-  SubWithoutTrace(n);
-}
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, AcceptedValues) {
-  SCOPED_TRACE("literal string");
-  SCOPED_TRACE(std::string("std::string"));
-  SCOPED_TRACE(1337);  // streamable type
-  const char* null_value = nullptr;
-  SCOPED_TRACE(null_value);
-  ADD_FAILURE() << "Just checking that all these values work fine.";
-}
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes.
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) {
-  printf("(expected to fail)\n");
-  // There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked.
-  ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
-  {
-    SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace");
-    // After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain
-    // the trace.
-    ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace.";
-  }
-  // Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there
-  // should be no trace again.
-  ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
-}
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop.
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) {
-  printf("(expected to fail)\n");
-  for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) {
-    SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i);
-    SubWithoutTrace(i);
-  }
-}
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine.
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) {
-  printf("(expected to fail)\n");
-  SubWithTrace(1);
-  SubWithTrace(2);
-}
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested.
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) {
-  printf("(expected to fail)\n");
-  SCOPED_TRACE("");  // A trace without a message.
-  SubWithTrace(2);
-}
-// Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope.
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) {
-  printf("(expected to fail)\n");
-  SCOPED_TRACE("A");
-  ADD_FAILURE()
-      << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A.";
-  SCOPED_TRACE("B");
-  ADD_FAILURE()
-      << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B.";
-  {
-    SCOPED_TRACE("C");
-    ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should "
-                  << "contain trace point A, B, and C.";
-  }
-  SCOPED_TRACE("D");
-  ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should "
-                << "contain trace point A, B, and D.";
-}
-#ifdef GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
-// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple
-// threads.  Namely, an assertion should be affected by
-// SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only.
-// Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test:
-//
-//   Thread A (main)                | Thread B (spawned)
-//   ===============================|================================
-//   spawns thread B                |
-//   -------------------------------+--------------------------------
-//   waits for n1                   | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
-//                                  | generates failure #1
-//                                  | notifies n1
-//   -------------------------------+--------------------------------
-//   SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A");       | waits for n2
-//   generates failure #2           |
-//   notifies n2                    |
-//   -------------------------------|--------------------------------
-//   waits for n3                   | generates failure #3
-//                                  | trace B dies
-//                                  | generates failure #4
-//                                  | notifies n3
-//   -------------------------------|--------------------------------
-//   generates failure #5           | finishes
-//   trace A dies                   |
-//   generates failure #6           |
-//   -------------------------------|--------------------------------
-//   waits for thread B to finish   |
-struct CheckPoints {
-  Notification n1;
-  Notification n2;
-  Notification n3;
-};
-static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) {
-  {
-    SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
-    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive).";
-    check_points->n1.Notify();
-    check_points->n2.WaitForNotification();
-    ADD_FAILURE()
-        << "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive).";
-  }  // Trace B dies here.
-  ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive).";
-  check_points->n3.Notify();
-}
-TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) {
-  printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n");
-  CheckPoints check_points;
-  ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace, &check_points,
-                                       nullptr);
-  check_points.n1.WaitForNotification();
-  {
-    SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A");
-    ADD_FAILURE()
-        << "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive).";
-    check_points.n2.Notify();
-    check_points.n3.WaitForNotification();
-    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive).";
-  }  // Trace A dies here.
-  ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive).";
-  thread.Join();
-}
-#endif  // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
-// Tests basic functionality of the ScopedTrace utility (most of its features
-// are already tested in SCOPED_TRACETest).
-TEST(ScopedTraceTest, WithExplicitFileAndLine) {
-  testing::ScopedTrace trace("explicit_file.cc", 123, "expected trace message");
-  ADD_FAILURE() << "Check that the trace is attached to a particular location.";
-}
-TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest,
-     DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) {
-  // This test body is intentionally empty.  Its sole purpose is for
-  // verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag
-  // suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of
-  // the test output.
-}
-// Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F.
-//
-// This function creates two failures intentionally.
-void AdHocTest() {
-  printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n");
-  EXPECT_TRUE(false);
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, 3);
-}
-// Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test.
-int RunAllTests() {
-  AdHocTest();
-  return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
-}
-// Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
-class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
- protected:
-  NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
-    printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n");
-    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
-  }
-  ~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() override {
-    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor.";
-  }
-  void SetUp() override { ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp()."; }
-  void TearDown() override {
-    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown.";
-  }
-};
-TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
-  ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body.";
-}
-// Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
-class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
- protected:
-  FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
-    printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
-    Init();
-  }
-  ~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() override {
-    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor.";
-  }
-  void SetUp() override {
-    ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp().  "
-                  << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
-                  << "had a fatal failure.";
-  }
-  void TearDown() override {
-    ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown().  "
-                  << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
-                  << "had a fatal failure.";
-  }
- private:
-  void Init() { FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; }
-};
-TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
-  ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body.  "
-                << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
-                << "had a fatal failure.";
-}
-// Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp().
-class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
- protected:
-  ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() override { Deinit(); }
-  void SetUp() override {
-    printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n");
-    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
-  }
-  void TearDown() override { FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown()."; }
- private:
-  void Deinit() { FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor."; }
-};
-TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
-  FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function.";
-}
-// Tests fatal failures in SetUp().
-class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
- protected:
-  ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() override { Deinit(); }
-  void SetUp() override {
-    printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n");
-    FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
-  }
-  void TearDown() override { FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown()."; }
- private:
-  void Deinit() { FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor."; }
-};
-TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
-  FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function.  "
-         << "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed.";
-}
-TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) {
-  ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected nonfatal failure in foo.cc";
-}
-TEST(GtestFailAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) {
-  GTEST_FAIL_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected fatal failure in foo.cc";
-}
-// The MixedUpTestSuiteTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a
-// test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in
-// the same test case use.  It deliberately contains two fixture
-// classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces.
-// The MixedUpTestSuiteWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that
-// when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND
-// same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will
-// fail.
-namespace foo {
-class MixedUpTestSuiteTest : public testing::Test {};
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestSuiteTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestSuiteTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
-class MixedUpTestSuiteWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {};
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestSuiteWithSameTestNameTest,
-       TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
-}  // namespace foo
-namespace bar {
-class MixedUpTestSuiteTest : public testing::Test {};
-// The following two tests are expected to fail.  We rely on the
-// golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message.
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestSuiteTest, ThisShouldFail) {}
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestSuiteTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {}
-class MixedUpTestSuiteWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {};
-// Expected to fail.  We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
-// generates the right error message.
-TEST_F(MixedUpTestSuiteWithSameTestNameTest,
-       TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
-}  // namespace bar
-// The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user
-// error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case.  The first
-// test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and
-// the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F.
-class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {};
-TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {}
-// Expected to fail.  We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
-// generates the right error message.
-TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {}
-class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {};
-TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {}
-// Expected to fail.  We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
-// generates the right error message.
-TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) {}
-// Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE().
-int global_integer = 0;
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
-  global_integer = 0;
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
-      { EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; },
-      "Expected non-fatal failure.");
-}
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables
-// (static or not).
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) {
-  int m = 0;
-  static int n;
-  n = 1;
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; },
-                          "Expected non-fatal failure.");
-}
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
-// one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; },
-                          "Expected non-fatal failure.");
-}
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no
-// non-fatal failure.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({}, "");
-}
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
-// non-fatal failures.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(
-      {
-        ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1.";
-        ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2.";
-      },
-      "");
-}
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal
-// failure.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; }, "");
-}
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
-// tested returns.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ return; }, "");
-}
-#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
-// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
-// tested throws.
-TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
-  try {
-    EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ throw 0; }, "");
-  } catch (int) {  // NOLINT
-  }
-}
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
-  global_integer = 0;
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(
-      { ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure."; },
-      "Expected fatal failure.");
-}
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static
-// variables.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) {
-  static int n;
-  n = 1;
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure."; },
-                       "Expected fatal failure.");
-}
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
-// one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; },
-                       "Expected fatal failure.");
-}
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal
-// failure.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({}, "");
-}
-// A helper for generating a fatal failure.
-void FatalFailure() { FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; }
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
-// fatal failures.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(
-      {
-        FatalFailure();
-        FatalFailure();
-      },
-      "");
-}
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal
-// failure.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; }, "");
-}
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
-// tested returns.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ return; }, "");
-}
-#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
-// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
-// tested throws.
-TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
-  printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
-  try {
-    EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ throw 0; }, "");
-  } catch (int) {  // NOLINT
-  }
-}
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
-// This #ifdef block tests the output of value-parameterized tests.
-std::string ParamNameFunc(const testing::TestParamInfo<std::string>& info) {
-  return info.param;
-}
-class ParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<std::string> {};
-TEST_P(ParamTest, Success) { EXPECT_EQ("a", GetParam()); }
-TEST_P(ParamTest, Failure) { EXPECT_EQ("b", GetParam()) << "Expected failure"; }
-INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(PrintingStrings, ParamTest,
-                         testing::Values(std::string("a")), ParamNameFunc);
-// The case where a suite has INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P but not TEST_P.
-using NoTests = ParamTest;
-INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(ThisIsOdd, NoTests, ::testing::Values("Hello"));
-// fails under kErrorOnUninstantiatedParameterizedTest=true
-class DetectNotInstantiatedTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {};
-TEST_P(DetectNotInstantiatedTest, Used) {}
-// This would make the test failure from the above go away.
-// INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(Fix, DetectNotInstantiatedTest, testing::Values(1));
-template <typename T>
-class TypedTest : public testing::Test {};
-TYPED_TEST_SUITE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>);
-TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) { EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam()); }
-TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) {
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
-}
-typedef testing::Types<char, int> TypesForTestWithNames;
-template <typename T>
-class TypedTestWithNames : public testing::Test {};
-class TypedTestNames {
- public:
-  template <typename T>
-  static std::string GetName(int i) {
-    if (std::is_same<T, char>::value)
-      return std::string("char") + ::testing::PrintToString(i);
-    if (std::is_same<T, int>::value)
-      return std::string("int") + ::testing::PrintToString(i);
-  }
-};
-TYPED_TEST_SUITE(TypedTestWithNames, TypesForTestWithNames, TypedTestNames);
-TYPED_TEST(TypedTestWithNames, Success) {}
-TYPED_TEST(TypedTestWithNames, Failure) { FAIL(); }
-template <typename T>
-class TypedTestP : public testing::Test {};
-TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P(TypedTestP);
-TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) { EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam()); }
-TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) {
-  EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
-}
-REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure);
-typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes;
-INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes);
-class TypedTestPNames {
- public:
-  template <typename T>
-  static std::string GetName(int i) {
-    if (std::is_same<T, unsigned char>::value) {
-      return std::string("unsignedChar") + ::testing::PrintToString(i);
-    }
-    if (std::is_same<T, unsigned int>::value) {
-      return std::string("unsignedInt") + ::testing::PrintToString(i);
-    }
-  }
-};
-INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P(UnsignedCustomName, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes,
-                               TypedTestPNames);
-template <typename T>
-class DetectNotInstantiatedTypesTest : public testing::Test {};
-TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P(DetectNotInstantiatedTypesTest);
-TYPED_TEST_P(DetectNotInstantiatedTypesTest, Used) {
-  TypeParam instantiate;
-  (void)instantiate;
-}
-REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P(DetectNotInstantiatedTypesTest, Used);
-// kErrorOnUninstantiatedTypeParameterizedTest=true would make the above fail.
-// Adding the following would make that test failure go away.
-//
-// typedef ::testing::Types<char, int, unsigned int> MyTypes;
-// INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P(All, DetectNotInstantiatedTypesTest, MyTypes);
-#ifdef GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
-// We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case
-// name ends with DeathTest are run first.
-TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {}
-// We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test
-// case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
-template <typename T>
-class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test {};
-typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes;
-TYPED_TEST_SUITE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes);
-TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {}
-// We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests
-// whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
-template <typename T>
-class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test {};
-TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest);
-TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {}
-REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst);
-INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes);
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
-// Tests various failure conditions of
-// EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}.
-class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test {
- public:  // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2.
-  enum FailureMode { FATAL_FAILURE, NONFATAL_FAILURE };
-  static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) {
-    if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) {
-      FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
-    } else {
-      ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
-    }
-  }
-};
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
-  // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
-  printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
-  // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
-  printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
-                       "Expected non-fatal "
-                       "failure.");
-  // Wrong message.
-  printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
-                       "Some other fatal failure "
-                       "expected.");
-}
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
-  // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
-  printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure.");
-  // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
-  printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure.");
-  // Wrong message.
-  printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
-                          "Some other non-fatal "
-                          "failure.");
-}
-#ifdef GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
-class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest {
- protected:
-  static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) {
-    ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, nullptr);
-    thread.Join();
-  }
-};
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
-  // We only intercept the current thread.
-  printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE),
-                       "Expected fatal failure.");
-}
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
-  // We only intercept the current thread.
-  printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
-                          "Expected non-fatal failure.");
-}
-typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest;
-// Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from
-// the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD.
-TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) {
-  printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
-  TestPartResultArray results;
-  {
-    ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter(
-        ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD,
-        &results);
-    AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE);
-    AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE);
-  }
-  // The two failures should not have been intercepted.
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail.";
-}
-#endif  // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
-  // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
-  printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
-  // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
-  printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
-                                      "Expected non-fatal failure.");
-  // Wrong message.
-  printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
-                                      "Some other fatal failure expected.");
-}
-TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
-  // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
-  printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(),
-                                         "Expected non-fatal "
-                                         "failure.");
-  // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
-  printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
-                                         "Expected fatal failure.");
-  // Wrong message.
-  printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
-  EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
-                                         "Some other non-fatal failure.");
-}
-class DynamicFixture : public testing::Test {
- protected:
-  DynamicFixture() { printf("DynamicFixture()\n"); }
-  ~DynamicFixture() override { printf("~DynamicFixture()\n"); }
-  void SetUp() override { printf("DynamicFixture::SetUp\n"); }
-  void TearDown() override { printf("DynamicFixture::TearDown\n"); }
-  static void SetUpTestSuite() { printf("DynamicFixture::SetUpTestSuite\n"); }
-  static void TearDownTestSuite() {
-    printf("DynamicFixture::TearDownTestSuite\n");
-  }
-};
-template <bool Pass>
-class DynamicTest : public DynamicFixture {
- public:
-  void TestBody() override { EXPECT_TRUE(Pass); }
-};
-auto dynamic_test = (
-    // Register two tests with the same fixture correctly.
-    testing::RegisterTest(
-        "DynamicFixture", "DynamicTestPass", nullptr, nullptr, __FILE__,
-        __LINE__, []() -> DynamicFixture* { return new DynamicTest<true>; }),
-    testing::RegisterTest(
-        "DynamicFixture", "DynamicTestFail", nullptr, nullptr, __FILE__,
-        __LINE__, []() -> DynamicFixture* { return new DynamicTest<false>; }),
-    // Register the same fixture with another name. That's fine.
-    testing::RegisterTest(
-        "DynamicFixtureAnotherName", "DynamicTestPass", nullptr, nullptr,
-        __FILE__, __LINE__,
-        []() -> DynamicFixture* { return new DynamicTest<true>; }),
-    // Register two tests with the same fixture incorrectly.
-    testing::RegisterTest(
-        "BadDynamicFixture1", "FixtureBase", nullptr, nullptr, __FILE__,
-        __LINE__, []() -> DynamicFixture* { return new DynamicTest<true>; }),
-    testing::RegisterTest(
-        "BadDynamicFixture1", "TestBase", nullptr, nullptr, __FILE__, __LINE__,
-        []() -> testing::Test* { return new DynamicTest<true>; }),
-    // Register two tests with the same fixture incorrectly by omitting the
-    // return type.
-    testing::RegisterTest(
-        "BadDynamicFixture2", "FixtureBase", nullptr, nullptr, __FILE__,
-        __LINE__, []() -> DynamicFixture* { return new DynamicTest<true>; }),
-    testing::RegisterTest("BadDynamicFixture2", "Derived", nullptr, nullptr,
-                          __FILE__, __LINE__,
-                          []() { return new DynamicTest<true>; }));
-// Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment().
-class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
- public:
-  void SetUp() override { printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); }
-  void TearDown() override {
-    printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
-    FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
-  }
-};
-class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
- public:
-  void SetUp() override { printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); }
-  void TearDown() override {
-    printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
-    ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
-  }
-};
-class TestSuiteThatFailsToSetUp : public testing::Test {
- public:
-  static void SetUpTestSuite() { EXPECT_TRUE(false); }
-};
-TEST_F(TestSuiteThatFailsToSetUp, ShouldNotRun) { std::abort(); }
-// The main function.
-//
-// The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some
-// of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results
-// with the "golden" file.
-int main(int argc, char** argv) {
-  GTEST_FLAG_SET(print_time, false);
-  // We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail.
-  // We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of
-  // this program with the golden file.
-  // It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many
-  // global side effects.  The following line serves as a test
-  // for it.
-  testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
-  bool internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests =
-      std::count(argv, argv + argc,
-                 std::string("internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests")) > 0;
-#ifdef GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
-  if (!GTEST_FLAG_GET(internal_run_death_test).empty()) {
-    // Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child
-    // process of an threadsafe-style death test.
-#if defined(GTEST_OS_WINDOWS)
-    posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout);
-#else
-    posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout);
-#endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
-    return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
-  }
-#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
-  if (internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
-  // Registers two global test environments.
-  // The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they
-  // are registered, and torn down in the reverse order.
-  testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment);
-  testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment);
-  GTEST_DISABLE_MSC_WARNINGS_POP_()  //  4127
-  return RunAllTests();
-}