chef-dk 3.9.0 → 3.10.1

data/spec/unit/policyfile_lock_validation_spec.rb

@@ -1,608 +1,608 @@
-#
-# Copyright:: Copyright (c) 2014-2018 Chef Software Inc.
-# License:: Apache License, Version 2.0
-#
-# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
-# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
-# You may obtain a copy of the License at
-#
-#     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
-#
-# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
-# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
-# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
-# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
-# limitations under the License.
-#
-
-require "spec_helper"
-require "chef-dk/policyfile_lock.rb"
-
-describe ChefDK::PolicyfileLock, "validating locked cookbooks" do
-
-  include ChefDK::Helpers
-
-  let(:pristine_cache_path) do
-    File.expand_path("spec/unit/fixtures/cookbook_cache", project_root)
-  end
-
-  let(:cache_path) do
-    temp_cache_path = File.join(tempdir, "local_cache")
-    FileUtils.cp_r(pristine_cache_path, temp_cache_path)
-    temp_cache_path
-  end
-
-  let(:policyfile_lock_path) { "/fakepath/Policyfile.lock.json" }
-
-  let(:local_cookbooks_root) do
-    temp_local_path_cookbooks = File.join(tempdir, "local_path_cookbooks")
-    FileUtils.cp_r(File.join(fixtures_path, "local_path_cookbooks"), temp_local_path_cookbooks)
-    temp_local_path_cookbooks
-  end
-
-  let(:name) { "application-server" }
-
-  let(:run_list) { [ "recipe[erlang::default]", "recipe[erchef::prereqs]", "recipe[erchef::app]" ] }
-
-  let(:storage_config) do
-    ChefDK::Policyfile::StorageConfig.new( cache_path: cache_path, relative_paths_root: local_cookbooks_root )
-  end
-
-  let(:solution_dependencies) do
-    {
-      "Policyfile" => [],
-      "dependencies" => {
-        "foo (1.0.0)" => [],
-        "local-cookbook (2.3.4)" => [],
-      },
-    }
-  end
-
-  let(:lock_generator) do
-    ChefDK::PolicyfileLock.build(storage_config) do |policy|
-
-      policy.name = name
-
-      policy.run_list = run_list
-
-      policy.cached_cookbook("foo") do |c|
-        c.origin = "https://artifact-server.example/foo/1.0.0"
-        c.cache_key = "foo-1.0.0"
-        c.source_options = { artifactserver: "https://artifact-server.example/foo/1.0.0", version: "1.0.0" }
-      end
-
-      policy.local_cookbook("local-cookbook") do |c|
-        c.source = "local-cookbook"
-        c.source_options = { path: "local-cookbook" }
-      end
-
-      policy.solution_dependencies.consume_lock_data(solution_dependencies)
-    end
-  end
-
-  let(:lock_data) do
-    lock_generator.to_lock
-  end
-
-  # Eagerly evaluate #policyfile_lock. This is necessary because many of
-  # the tests follow this general process:
-  # 1. setup valid state, generate a lockfile in-memory
-  # 2. make the state invalid
-  # 3. ensure validation detected the invalid state
-  #
-  # With lazy evaluation, #1 may happen after #2.
-  let!(:policyfile_lock) do
-    ChefDK::PolicyfileLock.new(storage_config).build_from_lock_data(lock_data)
-  end
-
-  let(:local_cookbook_path) { File.join(local_cookbooks_root, "local-cookbook") }
-
-  context "when no cookbooks have changed" do
-
-    it "validation succeeds" do
-      expect(policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks!).to be true
-    end
-
-  end
-
-  describe "when a :path sourced cookbook has changed" do
-
-    let(:metadata_path) { File.join(local_cookbook_path, "metadata.rb") }
-
-    let(:cookbook_lock_data) { policyfile_lock.lock_data_for("local-cookbook") }
-
-    # Validate the metadata is correct, so we know the test setup code
-    # hasn't done something wrong.
-    def ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-      expected_metadata_rb = <<~E
-        name             'local-cookbook'
-        maintainer       ''
-        maintainer_email ''
-        license          ''
-        description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-        long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-        version          '2.3.4'
-
-      E
-      expect(IO.read(metadata_path)).to eq(expected_metadata_rb)
-    end
-
-    context "when the cookbook is missing" do
-
-      before do
-        FileUtils.rm_rf(local_cookbook_path)
-      end
-
-      it "reports the missing cookbook and fails validation" do
-        full_path = File.expand_path(local_cookbook_path)
-        message = "Cookbook `local-cookbook' not found at path source `local-cookbook` (full path: `#{full_path}')"
-
-        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::LocalCookbookNotFound, message)
-      end
-
-    end
-
-    context "when the cookbook has an incorrect name" do
-
-      let(:new_metadata) do
-        <<~E
-          name             'WRONG'
-          maintainer       ''
-          maintainer_email ''
-          license          ''
-          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          version          '2.3.4'
-
-        E
-      end
-
-      before do
-        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
-      end
-
-      it "reports the unexpected cookbook and fails validation" do
-        policyfile_lock
-
-        message = "The cookbook at path source `local-cookbook' is expected to be named `local-cookbook', but is now named `WRONG' (full path: #{local_cookbook_path})"
-        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::MalformedCookbook, message)
-      end
-
-    end
-
-    context "when the cookbook has an updated version that violates no dependency constraints" do
-
-      let(:new_metadata) do
-        <<~E
-          name             'local-cookbook'
-          maintainer       ''
-          maintainer_email ''
-          license          ''
-          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          version          '2.3.5' # changed from 2.3.4
-
-        E
-      end
-
-      before do
-        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
-        policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! # no error
-      end
-
-      it "updates the version information in the lockfile" do
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.version).to eq("2.3.5")
-      end
-
-      it "updates the content identifier" do
-        old_id = lock_generator.lock_data_for("local-cookbook").identifier
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier).to_not eq(old_id)
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier).to eq("5a2b09f9d5e6e8a1a2d811c41d58ed200599adbe")
-      end
-
-      it "has an updated version and identifier" do
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data).to be_updated
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.version_updated?).to be true
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier_updated?).to be true
-      end
-    end
-
-    context "when the cookbook has an updated version that violates other dependency constraints" do
-
-      let(:solution_dependencies) do
-        {
-          "Policyfile" => [],
-          "dependencies" => {
-            "foo (1.0.0)" => [ [ "local-cookbook", "~> 2.0" ] ],
-          },
-        }
-      end
-
-      let(:new_metadata) do
-        <<~E
-          name             'local-cookbook'
-          maintainer       ''
-          maintainer_email ''
-          license          ''
-          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          version          '3.0.0' # changed from 2.3.4, violates `~> 2.0` constraint
-
-        E
-      end
-
-      before do
-        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
-      end
-
-      it "reports the dependency conflict and fails validation" do
-        expected_message = "Cookbook local-cookbook (3.0.0) conflicts with other dependencies:\nfoo (1.0.0) depends on local-cookbook ~> 2.0"
-        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::DependencyConflict, expected_message)
-      end
-
-    end
-
-    context "when a :path sourced cookbook has updated content" do
-
-      let(:recipe_path) { File.join(local_cookbook_path, "recipes/default.rb") }
-
-      let(:new_recipe) do
-        <<~E
-          # This is totally new code,
-          # it is different than the old code
-
-        E
-      end
-
-      before do
-        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-        with_file(recipe_path) { |f| f.print(new_recipe) }
-        policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! # no error
-      end
-
-      it "updates the lockfile with the new checksum and validation succeeds" do
-        old_id = lock_generator.lock_data_for("local-cookbook").identifier
-
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier).to_not eq(old_id)
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier).to eq("0f62422f744d173c35a3e74f1a8c76c8b92908c2")
-      end
-
-      it "has an updated identifier but not an updated version" do
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data).to be_updated
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.version_updated?).to be false
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier_updated?).to be true
-      end
-
-    end
-
-    context "when a :path source cookbook has added a dependency satisfied by the current cookbook set" do
-
-      let(:new_metadata) do
-        <<~E
-          name             'local-cookbook'
-          maintainer       ''
-          maintainer_email ''
-          license          ''
-          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          version          '2.3.4'
-
-          depends "foo", "=1.0.0"
-
-        E
-      end
-
-      before do
-        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
-        policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! # no error
-      end
-
-      it "updates the lockfile with the new checksum and validation succeeds" do
-        old_id = lock_generator.lock_data_for("local-cookbook").identifier
-
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier).to_not eq(old_id)
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier).to eq("af5e1252307bdf99b878ca5ede3c40e24ee9e45a")
-      end
-
-      it "has an updated identifier but not an updated version" do
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data).to be_updated
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.version_updated?).to be false
-        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier_updated?).to be true
-      end
-
-      it "has an updated dependency set" do
-        actual = policyfile_lock.solution_dependencies.to_lock["dependencies"]
-        expected = {
-          "local-cookbook (2.3.4)" => [ ["foo", "= 1.0.0"] ],
-          "foo (1.0.0)" => [],
-        }
-        expect(actual).to eq(expected)
-      end
-
-    end
-
-    context "when a :path source cookbook has added a dependency not satisfied by the current cookbook set" do
-
-      let(:new_metadata) do
-        <<~E
-          name             'local-cookbook'
-          maintainer       ''
-          maintainer_email ''
-          license          ''
-          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          version          '2.3.4'
-
-          depends "not-a-thing"
-
-        E
-      end
-
-      before do
-        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
-      end
-
-      it "reports the not-satisfied dependency and validation fails" do
-        error_message = "Cookbook local-cookbook (2.3.4) has dependency constraints that cannot be met by the existing cookbook set:\n" +
-          "Cookbook not-a-thing isn't included in the existing cookbook set."
-        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::DependencyConflict, error_message)
-      end
-
-    end
-
-    context "when a :path source cookbook has modified a dep constraint and the new constraint is satisfied" do
-
-      let(:solution_dependencies) do
-        {
-          "Policyfile" => [],
-          "dependencies" => {
-            "foo (1.0.0)" => [],
-            "local-cookbook (2.3.4)" => [ ["foo", ">= 0.0.0"] ],
-          },
-        }
-      end
-
-      let(:new_metadata) do
-        <<~E
-          name             'local-cookbook'
-          maintainer       ''
-          maintainer_email ''
-          license          ''
-          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          version          '2.3.4'
-
-          depends "foo", ">= 1.0.0"
-
-        E
-      end
-
-      before do
-        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
-        policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! # no error
-      end
-
-      it "updates the lockfile with the new checksum and validation succeeds" do
-        actual = policyfile_lock.solution_dependencies.to_lock["dependencies"]
-        expected = {
-          "local-cookbook (2.3.4)" => [ ["foo", ">= 1.0.0"] ],
-          "foo (1.0.0)" => [],
-        }
-        expect(actual).to eq(expected)
-      end
-
-    end
-
-    context "when a :path source cookbook has modified a dep constraint and the new constraint is not satisfied" do
-
-      let(:new_metadata) do
-        <<~E
-          name             'local-cookbook'
-          maintainer       ''
-          maintainer_email ''
-          license          ''
-          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          version          '2.3.4'
-
-          depends "foo", "~> 2.0"
-
-        E
-      end
-
-      before do
-        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
-      end
-
-      it "reports the not-satisfied dependency and validation fails" do
-        error_message = "Cookbook local-cookbook (2.3.4) has dependency constraints that cannot be met by the existing cookbook set:\n" +
-          "Dependency on foo ~> 2.0 conflicts with existing version foo (1.0.0)"
-        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::DependencyConflict, error_message)
-      end
-
-    end
-
-    context "when a :path source cookbook has updated it's version and another path source cookbook has updated its constraint" do
-
-      # The situation we want to test here is when the user modifies a
-      # cookbook's version, and also the dependency constraint on that cookbook
-      # in a different cookbook. For example, cookbook A depends on B ~> 1.0,
-      # then the user updates A to depend on B ~> 2.0, and bumps the version of B to 2.0.
-
-      let(:lock_generator) do
-        ChefDK::PolicyfileLock.build(storage_config) do |policy|
-
-          policy.name = name
-
-          policy.run_list = run_list
-
-          policy.cached_cookbook("foo") do |c|
-            c.origin = "https://artifact-server.example/foo/1.0.0"
-            c.cache_key = "foo-1.0.0"
-            c.source_options = { artifactserver: "https://artifact-server.example/foo/1.0.0", version: "1.0.0" }
-          end
-
-          policy.local_cookbook("local-cookbook") do |c|
-            c.source = "local-cookbook"
-            c.source_options = { path: "local-cookbook" }
-          end
-
-          policy.local_cookbook("another-local-cookbook") do |c|
-            c.source = "another-local-cookbook"
-            c.source_options = { path: "another-local-cookbook" }
-          end
-          policy.solution_dependencies.consume_lock_data(solution_dependencies)
-        end
-      end
-
-      # Represents dependencies before modification
-      let(:solution_dependencies) do
-        {
-          "Policyfile" => [],
-          "dependencies" => {
-            "foo (1.0.0)" => [],
-            "local-cookbook (2.3.4)" => [ ],
-            "another-local-cookbook (0.1.0)" => [ ["local-cookbook", "= 2.3.4"] ],
-          },
-        }
-      end
-
-      let(:new_metadata_local_cookbook) do
-        <<~E
-          name             'local-cookbook'
-          maintainer       ''
-          maintainer_email ''
-          license          ''
-          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
-          version          '3.0.0' # changed from 2.3.4
-
-        E
-      end
-
-      let(:new_metadata_another_local_cookbook) do
-        <<~E
-          name             'another-local-cookbook'
-          maintainer       ''
-          maintainer_email ''
-          license          ''
-          description      'Installs/Configures another-local-cookbook'
-          long_description 'Installs/Configures another-local-cookbook'
-          version          '0.1.0'
-
-          # This dep now requires the updated version of 'local-cookbook'
-          depends 'local-cookbook', '= 3.0.0'
-        E
-      end
-
-      let(:metadata_path_another_local_cookbook) do
-        File.join(local_cookbooks_root, "another-local-cookbook", "metadata.rb")
-      end
-
-      before do
-        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata_local_cookbook) }
-        with_file(metadata_path_another_local_cookbook) { |f| f.print(new_metadata_another_local_cookbook) }
-        policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! # no error
-      end
-
-      context "and the new constraint is satisfied by they new version" do
-
-        it "updates the version and constraint in the lockfile (validation succeeds)" do
-          actual = policyfile_lock.solution_dependencies.to_lock["dependencies"]
-          expected = {
-            "local-cookbook (3.0.0)" => [ ],
-            "another-local-cookbook (0.1.0)" => [ [ "local-cookbook", "= 3.0.0" ] ],
-            "foo (1.0.0)" => [],
-          }
-          expect(actual).to eq(expected)
-        end
-
-      end
-
-    end
-
-  end
-
-  # Cached cookbook is both supermarket and git
-  context "when a cached cookbook is modified" do
-
-    let(:cached_cookbook_path) { File.join(cache_path, "foo-1.0.0") }
-
-    let(:metadata_path) { File.join(cached_cookbook_path, "metadata.rb") }
-
-    # Validate the metadata is correct, so we know the test setup code
-    # hasn't done something wrong.
-    def ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-      expected_metadata_rb = <<~E
-        name             'foo'
-        maintainer       ''
-        maintainer_email ''
-        license          ''
-        description      'Installs/Configures foo'
-        long_description 'Installs/Configures foo'
-        version          '1.0.0'
-
-      E
-      expect(IO.read(metadata_path)).to eq(expected_metadata_rb)
-    end
-
-    context "when the cookbook missing" do
-
-      before do
-        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-        FileUtils.rm_rf(cached_cookbook_path)
-      end
-
-      it "reports the missing cookbook and fails validation" do
-        message = "Cookbook `foo' not found at expected cache location `foo-1.0.0' (full path: `#{cached_cookbook_path}')"
-        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::CachedCookbookNotFound, message)
-      end
-
-    end
-
-    context "when the content has changed" do
-
-      # This basically means the user modified the cached cookbook. There's no
-      # technical reason we need to be whiny about this, but if we treat it like
-      # we would a path cookbook, you could end up with two cookbooks that look
-      # like the canonical (e.g.) apache2 1.2.3 cookbook from supermarket with no
-      # indication of which is which.
-      #
-      # We'll treat it like an error, but we need to provide a "pristine"
-      # function to let the user recover.
-
-      let(:new_metadata) do
-        <<~E
-          # This is a cached copy of an upstream cookbook, I should not be editing it but
-          # YOLO
-          name             'foo'
-          maintainer       ''
-          maintainer_email ''
-          license          ''
-          description      'Installs/Configures foo'
-          long_description 'Installs/Configures foo'
-          version          '1.0.0'
-        E
-      end
-
-      before do
-        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
-        policyfile_lock
-        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
-      end
-
-      it "reports the modified cached cookbook and validation fails" do
-        message = "Cached cookbook `foo' (1.0.0) has been modified since the lockfile was generated. Cached cookbooks cannot be modified. (full path: `#{cached_cookbook_path}')"
-        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::CachedCookbookModified, message)
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end
+#
+# Copyright:: Copyright (c) 2014-2018 Chef Software Inc.
+# License:: Apache License, Version 2.0
+#
+# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+# You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+#     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+# limitations under the License.
+#
+
+require "spec_helper"
+require "chef-dk/policyfile_lock.rb"
+
+describe ChefDK::PolicyfileLock, "validating locked cookbooks" do
+
+  include ChefDK::Helpers
+
+  let(:pristine_cache_path) do
+    File.expand_path("spec/unit/fixtures/cookbook_cache", project_root)
+  end
+
+  let(:cache_path) do
+    temp_cache_path = File.join(tempdir, "local_cache")
+    FileUtils.cp_r(pristine_cache_path, temp_cache_path)
+    temp_cache_path
+  end
+
+  let(:policyfile_lock_path) { "/fakepath/Policyfile.lock.json" }
+
+  let(:local_cookbooks_root) do
+    temp_local_path_cookbooks = File.join(tempdir, "local_path_cookbooks")
+    FileUtils.cp_r(File.join(fixtures_path, "local_path_cookbooks"), temp_local_path_cookbooks)
+    temp_local_path_cookbooks
+  end
+
+  let(:name) { "application-server" }
+
+  let(:run_list) { [ "recipe[erlang::default]", "recipe[erchef::prereqs]", "recipe[erchef::app]" ] }
+
+  let(:storage_config) do
+    ChefDK::Policyfile::StorageConfig.new( cache_path: cache_path, relative_paths_root: local_cookbooks_root )
+  end
+
+  let(:solution_dependencies) do
+    {
+      "Policyfile" => [],
+      "dependencies" => {
+        "foo (1.0.0)" => [],
+        "local-cookbook (2.3.4)" => [],
+      },
+    }
+  end
+
+  let(:lock_generator) do
+    ChefDK::PolicyfileLock.build(storage_config) do |policy|
+
+      policy.name = name
+
+      policy.run_list = run_list
+
+      policy.cached_cookbook("foo") do |c|
+        c.origin = "https://artifact-server.example/foo/1.0.0"
+        c.cache_key = "foo-1.0.0"
+        c.source_options = { artifactserver: "https://artifact-server.example/foo/1.0.0", version: "1.0.0" }
+      end
+
+      policy.local_cookbook("local-cookbook") do |c|
+        c.source = "local-cookbook"
+        c.source_options = { path: "local-cookbook" }
+      end
+
+      policy.solution_dependencies.consume_lock_data(solution_dependencies)
+    end
+  end
+
+  let(:lock_data) do
+    lock_generator.to_lock
+  end
+
+  # Eagerly evaluate #policyfile_lock. This is necessary because many of
+  # the tests follow this general process:
+  # 1. setup valid state, generate a lockfile in-memory
+  # 2. make the state invalid
+  # 3. ensure validation detected the invalid state
+  #
+  # With lazy evaluation, #1 may happen after #2.
+  let!(:policyfile_lock) do
+    ChefDK::PolicyfileLock.new(storage_config).build_from_lock_data(lock_data)
+  end
+
+  let(:local_cookbook_path) { File.join(local_cookbooks_root, "local-cookbook") }
+
+  context "when no cookbooks have changed" do
+
+    it "validation succeeds" do
+      expect(policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks!).to be true
+    end
+
+  end
+
+  describe "when a :path sourced cookbook has changed" do
+
+    let(:metadata_path) { File.join(local_cookbook_path, "metadata.rb") }
+
+    let(:cookbook_lock_data) { policyfile_lock.lock_data_for("local-cookbook") }
+
+    # Validate the metadata is correct, so we know the test setup code
+    # hasn't done something wrong.
+    def ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+      expected_metadata_rb = <<~E
+        name             'local-cookbook'
+        maintainer       ''
+        maintainer_email ''
+        license          ''
+        description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+        long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+        version          '2.3.4'
+
+      E
+      expect(IO.read(metadata_path)).to eq(expected_metadata_rb)
+    end
+
+    context "when the cookbook is missing" do
+
+      before do
+        FileUtils.rm_rf(local_cookbook_path)
+      end
+
+      it "reports the missing cookbook and fails validation" do
+        full_path = File.expand_path(local_cookbook_path)
+        message = "Cookbook `local-cookbook' not found at path source `local-cookbook` (full path: `#{full_path}')"
+
+        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::LocalCookbookNotFound, message)
+      end
+
+    end
+
+    context "when the cookbook has an incorrect name" do
+
+      let(:new_metadata) do
+        <<~E
+          name             'WRONG'
+          maintainer       ''
+          maintainer_email ''
+          license          ''
+          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          version          '2.3.4'
+
+        E
+      end
+
+      before do
+        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
+      end
+
+      it "reports the unexpected cookbook and fails validation" do
+        policyfile_lock
+
+        message = "The cookbook at path source `local-cookbook' is expected to be named `local-cookbook', but is now named `WRONG' (full path: #{local_cookbook_path})"
+        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::MalformedCookbook, message)
+      end
+
+    end
+
+    context "when the cookbook has an updated version that violates no dependency constraints" do
+
+      let(:new_metadata) do
+        <<~E
+          name             'local-cookbook'
+          maintainer       ''
+          maintainer_email ''
+          license          ''
+          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          version          '2.3.5' # changed from 2.3.4
+
+        E
+      end
+
+      before do
+        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
+        policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! # no error
+      end
+
+      it "updates the version information in the lockfile" do
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.version).to eq("2.3.5")
+      end
+
+      it "updates the content identifier" do
+        old_id = lock_generator.lock_data_for("local-cookbook").identifier
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier).to_not eq(old_id)
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier).to eq("5a2b09f9d5e6e8a1a2d811c41d58ed200599adbe")
+      end
+
+      it "has an updated version and identifier" do
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data).to be_updated
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.version_updated?).to be true
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier_updated?).to be true
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "when the cookbook has an updated version that violates other dependency constraints" do
+
+      let(:solution_dependencies) do
+        {
+          "Policyfile" => [],
+          "dependencies" => {
+            "foo (1.0.0)" => [ [ "local-cookbook", "~> 2.0" ] ],
+          },
+        }
+      end
+
+      let(:new_metadata) do
+        <<~E
+          name             'local-cookbook'
+          maintainer       ''
+          maintainer_email ''
+          license          ''
+          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          version          '3.0.0' # changed from 2.3.4, violates `~> 2.0` constraint
+
+        E
+      end
+
+      before do
+        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
+      end
+
+      it "reports the dependency conflict and fails validation" do
+        expected_message = "Cookbook local-cookbook (3.0.0) conflicts with other dependencies:\nfoo (1.0.0) depends on local-cookbook ~> 2.0"
+        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::DependencyConflict, expected_message)
+      end
+
+    end
+
+    context "when a :path sourced cookbook has updated content" do
+
+      let(:recipe_path) { File.join(local_cookbook_path, "recipes/default.rb") }
+
+      let(:new_recipe) do
+        <<~E
+          # This is totally new code,
+          # it is different than the old code
+
+        E
+      end
+
+      before do
+        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+        with_file(recipe_path) { |f| f.print(new_recipe) }
+        policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! # no error
+      end
+
+      it "updates the lockfile with the new checksum and validation succeeds" do
+        old_id = lock_generator.lock_data_for("local-cookbook").identifier
+
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier).to_not eq(old_id)
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier).to eq("0f62422f744d173c35a3e74f1a8c76c8b92908c2")
+      end
+
+      it "has an updated identifier but not an updated version" do
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data).to be_updated
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.version_updated?).to be false
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier_updated?).to be true
+      end
+
+    end
+
+    context "when a :path source cookbook has added a dependency satisfied by the current cookbook set" do
+
+      let(:new_metadata) do
+        <<~E
+          name             'local-cookbook'
+          maintainer       ''
+          maintainer_email ''
+          license          ''
+          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          version          '2.3.4'
+
+          depends "foo", "=1.0.0"
+
+        E
+      end
+
+      before do
+        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
+        policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! # no error
+      end
+
+      it "updates the lockfile with the new checksum and validation succeeds" do
+        old_id = lock_generator.lock_data_for("local-cookbook").identifier
+
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier).to_not eq(old_id)
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier).to eq("af5e1252307bdf99b878ca5ede3c40e24ee9e45a")
+      end
+
+      it "has an updated identifier but not an updated version" do
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data).to be_updated
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.version_updated?).to be false
+        expect(cookbook_lock_data.identifier_updated?).to be true
+      end
+
+      it "has an updated dependency set" do
+        actual = policyfile_lock.solution_dependencies.to_lock["dependencies"]
+        expected = {
+          "local-cookbook (2.3.4)" => [ ["foo", "= 1.0.0"] ],
+          "foo (1.0.0)" => [],
+        }
+        expect(actual).to eq(expected)
+      end
+
+    end
+
+    context "when a :path source cookbook has added a dependency not satisfied by the current cookbook set" do
+
+      let(:new_metadata) do
+        <<~E
+          name             'local-cookbook'
+          maintainer       ''
+          maintainer_email ''
+          license          ''
+          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          version          '2.3.4'
+
+          depends "not-a-thing"
+
+        E
+      end
+
+      before do
+        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
+      end
+
+      it "reports the not-satisfied dependency and validation fails" do
+        error_message = "Cookbook local-cookbook (2.3.4) has dependency constraints that cannot be met by the existing cookbook set:\n" +
+          "Cookbook not-a-thing isn't included in the existing cookbook set."
+        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::DependencyConflict, error_message)
+      end
+
+    end
+
+    context "when a :path source cookbook has modified a dep constraint and the new constraint is satisfied" do
+
+      let(:solution_dependencies) do
+        {
+          "Policyfile" => [],
+          "dependencies" => {
+            "foo (1.0.0)" => [],
+            "local-cookbook (2.3.4)" => [ ["foo", ">= 0.0.0"] ],
+          },
+        }
+      end
+
+      let(:new_metadata) do
+        <<~E
+          name             'local-cookbook'
+          maintainer       ''
+          maintainer_email ''
+          license          ''
+          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          version          '2.3.4'
+
+          depends "foo", ">= 1.0.0"
+
+        E
+      end
+
+      before do
+        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
+        policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! # no error
+      end
+
+      it "updates the lockfile with the new checksum and validation succeeds" do
+        actual = policyfile_lock.solution_dependencies.to_lock["dependencies"]
+        expected = {
+          "local-cookbook (2.3.4)" => [ ["foo", ">= 1.0.0"] ],
+          "foo (1.0.0)" => [],
+        }
+        expect(actual).to eq(expected)
+      end
+
+    end
+
+    context "when a :path source cookbook has modified a dep constraint and the new constraint is not satisfied" do
+
+      let(:new_metadata) do
+        <<~E
+          name             'local-cookbook'
+          maintainer       ''
+          maintainer_email ''
+          license          ''
+          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          version          '2.3.4'
+
+          depends "foo", "~> 2.0"
+
+        E
+      end
+
+      before do
+        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
+      end
+
+      it "reports the not-satisfied dependency and validation fails" do
+        error_message = "Cookbook local-cookbook (2.3.4) has dependency constraints that cannot be met by the existing cookbook set:\n" +
+          "Dependency on foo ~> 2.0 conflicts with existing version foo (1.0.0)"
+        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::DependencyConflict, error_message)
+      end
+
+    end
+
+    context "when a :path source cookbook has updated it's version and another path source cookbook has updated its constraint" do
+
+      # The situation we want to test here is when the user modifies a
+      # cookbook's version, and also the dependency constraint on that cookbook
+      # in a different cookbook. For example, cookbook A depends on B ~> 1.0,
+      # then the user updates A to depend on B ~> 2.0, and bumps the version of B to 2.0.
+
+      let(:lock_generator) do
+        ChefDK::PolicyfileLock.build(storage_config) do |policy|
+
+          policy.name = name
+
+          policy.run_list = run_list
+
+          policy.cached_cookbook("foo") do |c|
+            c.origin = "https://artifact-server.example/foo/1.0.0"
+            c.cache_key = "foo-1.0.0"
+            c.source_options = { artifactserver: "https://artifact-server.example/foo/1.0.0", version: "1.0.0" }
+          end
+
+          policy.local_cookbook("local-cookbook") do |c|
+            c.source = "local-cookbook"
+            c.source_options = { path: "local-cookbook" }
+          end
+
+          policy.local_cookbook("another-local-cookbook") do |c|
+            c.source = "another-local-cookbook"
+            c.source_options = { path: "another-local-cookbook" }
+          end
+          policy.solution_dependencies.consume_lock_data(solution_dependencies)
+        end
+      end
+
+      # Represents dependencies before modification
+      let(:solution_dependencies) do
+        {
+          "Policyfile" => [],
+          "dependencies" => {
+            "foo (1.0.0)" => [],
+            "local-cookbook (2.3.4)" => [ ],
+            "another-local-cookbook (0.1.0)" => [ ["local-cookbook", "= 2.3.4"] ],
+          },
+        }
+      end
+
+      let(:new_metadata_local_cookbook) do
+        <<~E
+          name             'local-cookbook'
+          maintainer       ''
+          maintainer_email ''
+          license          ''
+          description      'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          long_description 'Installs/Configures local-cookbook'
+          version          '3.0.0' # changed from 2.3.4
+
+        E
+      end
+
+      let(:new_metadata_another_local_cookbook) do
+        <<~E
+          name             'another-local-cookbook'
+          maintainer       ''
+          maintainer_email ''
+          license          ''
+          description      'Installs/Configures another-local-cookbook'
+          long_description 'Installs/Configures another-local-cookbook'
+          version          '0.1.0'
+
+          # This dep now requires the updated version of 'local-cookbook'
+          depends 'local-cookbook', '= 3.0.0'
+        E
+      end
+
+      let(:metadata_path_another_local_cookbook) do
+        File.join(local_cookbooks_root, "another-local-cookbook", "metadata.rb")
+      end
+
+      before do
+        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata_local_cookbook) }
+        with_file(metadata_path_another_local_cookbook) { |f| f.print(new_metadata_another_local_cookbook) }
+        policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! # no error
+      end
+
+      context "and the new constraint is satisfied by they new version" do
+
+        it "updates the version and constraint in the lockfile (validation succeeds)" do
+          actual = policyfile_lock.solution_dependencies.to_lock["dependencies"]
+          expected = {
+            "local-cookbook (3.0.0)" => [ ],
+            "another-local-cookbook (0.1.0)" => [ [ "local-cookbook", "= 3.0.0" ] ],
+            "foo (1.0.0)" => [],
+          }
+          expect(actual).to eq(expected)
+        end
+
+      end
+
+    end
+
+  end
+
+  # Cached cookbook is both supermarket and git
+  context "when a cached cookbook is modified" do
+
+    let(:cached_cookbook_path) { File.join(cache_path, "foo-1.0.0") }
+
+    let(:metadata_path) { File.join(cached_cookbook_path, "metadata.rb") }
+
+    # Validate the metadata is correct, so we know the test setup code
+    # hasn't done something wrong.
+    def ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+      expected_metadata_rb = <<~E
+        name             'foo'
+        maintainer       ''
+        maintainer_email ''
+        license          ''
+        description      'Installs/Configures foo'
+        long_description 'Installs/Configures foo'
+        version          '1.0.0'
+
+      E
+      expect(IO.read(metadata_path)).to eq(expected_metadata_rb)
+    end
+
+    context "when the cookbook missing" do
+
+      before do
+        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+        FileUtils.rm_rf(cached_cookbook_path)
+      end
+
+      it "reports the missing cookbook and fails validation" do
+        message = "Cookbook `foo' not found at expected cache location `foo-1.0.0' (full path: `#{cached_cookbook_path}')"
+        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::CachedCookbookNotFound, message)
+      end
+
+    end
+
+    context "when the content has changed" do
+
+      # This basically means the user modified the cached cookbook. There's no
+      # technical reason we need to be whiny about this, but if we treat it like
+      # we would a path cookbook, you could end up with two cookbooks that look
+      # like the canonical (e.g.) apache2 1.2.3 cookbook from supermarket with no
+      # indication of which is which.
+      #
+      # We'll treat it like an error, but we need to provide a "pristine"
+      # function to let the user recover.
+
+      let(:new_metadata) do
+        <<~E
+          # This is a cached copy of an upstream cookbook, I should not be editing it but
+          # YOLO
+          name             'foo'
+          maintainer       ''
+          maintainer_email ''
+          license          ''
+          description      'Installs/Configures foo'
+          long_description 'Installs/Configures foo'
+          version          '1.0.0'
+        E
+      end
+
+      before do
+        ensure_metadata_as_expected!
+        policyfile_lock
+        with_file(metadata_path) { |f| f.print(new_metadata) }
+      end
+
+      it "reports the modified cached cookbook and validation fails" do
+        message = "Cached cookbook `foo' (1.0.0) has been modified since the lockfile was generated. Cached cookbooks cannot be modified. (full path: `#{cached_cookbook_path}')"
+        expect { policyfile_lock.validate_cookbooks! }.to raise_error(ChefDK::CachedCookbookModified, message)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end