avm-tools 0.110.0 → 0.111.0

data/vendor/eac_git/spec/lib/eac_git/local/commit_spec.rb

@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
-# frozen_string_literal: true
-
-require 'eac_git/local'
-require 'eac_git/local/commit'
-require 'tmpdir'
-
-RSpec.describe ::EacGit::Local::Commit, git: true do
-  let(:git) { stubbed_git_local_repo }
-
-  let(:first_commit_sha1) do
-    git.file('a.txt').write('AAA')
-    git.file('b.txt').write('BBB')
-    git.command('add', '.').execute!
-    git.command('commit', '-m', 'First commit.').execute!
-    git.rev_parse('HEAD')
-  end
-
-  let(:second_commit_sha1) do
-    first_commit_sha1
-    git.file('a.txt').write('AAAAA')
-    git.file('b.txt').delete
-    git.file('ç.txt').write('CCC')
-    git.command('add', '.').execute!
-    git.command('commit', '-m', 'Second commit.').execute!
-    git.rev_parse('HEAD')
-  end
-
-  let(:first_commit) { described_class.new(git, first_commit_sha1) }
-  let(:second_commit) { described_class.new(git, second_commit_sha1) }
-
-  describe '#changed_files' do
-    it { expect(first_commit.changed_files.count).to eq(2) }
-    it { expect(second_commit.changed_files.count).to eq(3) }
-
-    {
-      'first_commit' => %w[a.txt b.txt],
-      'second_commit' => %w[a.txt b.txt ç.txt]
-    }.each do |commit_name, filenames|
-      filenames.each do |filename|
-        it "find file \"#{filename}\" in commit \"#{commit_name}\"" do
-          commit = send(commit_name)
-          file = commit.changed_files.find { |f| f.path == filename }
-          expect(file).to be_a(::EacGit::Local::Commit::ChangedFile)
-        end
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#changed_files_size' do
-    it { expect(first_commit.changed_files_size).to eq(6) }
-    it { expect(second_commit.changed_files_size).to eq(8) }
-  end
-
-  describe '#root_child?' do
-    it { expect(first_commit.root_child?).to eq(true) }
-    it { expect(second_commit.root_child?).to eq(false) }
-  end
-end

data/vendor/eac_git/spec/rubocop_spec.rb

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-# frozen_string_literal: true
-
-::EacRubyUtils::Rspec.default_setup.describe_rubocop

data/vendor/eac_git/spec/spec_helper.rb

@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
-# frozen_string_literal: true
-
-require 'eac_ruby_utils/rspec/default_setup'
-::EacRubyUtils::Rspec.default_setup_create(::File.expand_path('..', __dir__))

data/vendor/eac_git/vendor/git-subrepo/Changes

@@ -1,110 +0,0 @@
----
-version: 0.4.1
-date:    Thu Jan  9 17:11:21 CST 2020
-- Fix Bash version error messages and add to .rc
-- Nicer YAML formatting in .travis.yml
-- Wrap a long line
-- Update the docs
-- Force `make update` to always update docs
-- Don't use XXX in perl stuff
-- Add testing on MacOS
-- Remove conflicting -C from install -d commands.
-- Update version requirement documentation
-- Correct error message in branch
-- Use topo-order in subrepo branch
-- Make “git subrepo clean -f ...” delete refs correctly
-- Fix #410 Push empty repositories with recent git versions
-- Make subrepo work when run in a worktree
-- Simplify finding subrepos
-- Ask git to find the .gitrepo files
-- Doc: fix sentence repetition
-- Fix typos
-- Fixed typo
-- Travis CI not checking out a branch.
----
-version: 0.4.0
-date:    Thu Nov  8 12:26:38 CET 2018
-changes:
-- Fix #325 Do not squash main repo commits
-- Improve error message for worktree handling
-- Make version checking portable. #307
-- #307, improve version check
-- #307, update version requirement
-- Fix part #308, Add stderr output if commands fail
-- Fix #306: Add check to prevent following commits with no .gitrepo
-- Remove dry-run flag as it's not implemented. Make sure branch --force delete worktree
-- Fix #296, Replace --first-parent with --ancestry-path
-- Fix #291, specify Trusty host to get new 2.x git
-- Fix #258, add --no-tags to git fetch
-- Test that no remotes are created during clone
-- #257 Remove remote creation to avoid problems with fetch --all
-- (origin/issue/150_to_0.4.0) Fix remove-worktree, remove unused parameters
-- Regenerate completion files
-- filter-branch operation should not be done on HEAD
-- Cleanup push and add hint to push directly after pull
-- Simplify cleanup and add worktree to status
-- Add --method option to init/clone, add a 'config' command
-- Updated unit tests to support the new logic
-- Use 'git worktree' for merge/rebase
-- Update docs to reflect how things should work
-- Make it possible to specify commit messages
-- Redesign, trash the tree hash approach and use merges instead
-- Add release branches to travis-ci
-- Add --method option to init/clone, add a 'config' command
-- Detect multiple pulls, use -u flag to decide
-- Don't reuse previous commit message when using --all
-- Update the docs for pull and push
-- Update error messages when failing merge/rebase
-- Fix env var bug in test/push.t
-- Do not overwrite author information
----
-version: 0.3.1
-date:    Tue Jan  3 23:08:56 PST 2017
-changes:
-- Updated release for homebrew
-- Fix #192
----
-version: 0.3.0
-date:    Wed Dec  2 19:19:43 PST 2015
-changes:
-- Fix issue #98 and host of others (89, 91, 95, 96)
-- Adds support for the merge-base command
-- Adds stability to many commands
-- Command completion updates
-- Rename `init` to `.rc`
-- @grimmySwe++ @dzzh++ @jrosdahl++ @perlpunk++
----
-version: 0.2.3
-date:    Sun Aug  9 13:44:22 PDT 2015
-changes:
-- Fix issues #75 and #76
----
-version: 0.2.2
-date:    Wed Jul 22 09:45:13 PDT 2015
-changes:
-- Added the `init` subcommand
-- Applied doc fixes
----
-version: 0.2.1
-date:    Sat Mar 28 07:52:22 PDT 2015
-changes:
-- Allows subrepo clone to clone to an empty branch; fixes #26.
-- Refs in status
-- Empty parent set to 'none' in .gitrepo file.
-- Bug fixes
----
-version: 0.2.0
-date:    Sat Jan 24 06:22:05 PST 2015
-changes:
-- Massive overhaul
-- .gitrepo files remain the same so backwards compatible
-- Introduce the branch and commit subcommands
-- The checkout subcommand goes away
-- Operations work much smoother like normal Git flow
-- Much more testing
-- Better doc
----
-version: 0.1.0
-date:    Fri Feb 21 12:25:53 2014 -0800
-changes:
-- First version

data/vendor/eac_git/vendor/git-subrepo/Intro.pod

@@ -1,509 +0,0 @@
-=pod
-
-=for comment
-DO NOT EDIT. This Pod was generated by Swim v0.1.48.
-See http://github.com/ingydotnet/swim-pm#readme
-
-=encoding utf8
-
-=head1 Introducing Git Subrepos
-
-There is a new git command called C<subrepo> that is meant to be a solid
-alternative to the C<submodule> and C<subtree> commands. All 3 of these
-commands allow you to include external repositories (pinned to specific
-commits) in your main repository. This is an often needed feature for project
-development under a source control system like Git. Unfortunately, the
-C<submodule> command is severely lacking, and the C<subtree> command (an
-attempt to make things better) is also very flawed. Fortunately, the
-C<subrepo> command is here to save the day.
-
-This article will discuss how the previous commands work, and where they go
-wrong, while explaining how the new C<subrepo> command fixes the issues.
-
-It should be noted that there are 3 distinct roles (ways people use repos)
-involved in discussing this topic:
-
-=over
-
-=item * B<owner> — The primary author and repo owner
-
-=item * B<collaborators> — Other developers who contribute to the repo
-
-=item * B<users> — People who simply use the repo software
-
-=back
-
-=head2 Introducing C<subrepo>
-
-While the main point is to show how subrepo addresses the shortcomings
-of submodule and subtree, I'll start by giving a quick intro to the
-subrepo command.
-
-Let's say that you have a project repo called 'freebird' and you want to have
-it include 2 other external repos, 'lynyrd' and 'skynyrd'. You would do the
-following:
-
-    git clone git@github.com/you/freebird
-    cd freebird
-    git subrepo clone git@github.com/you/lynyrd ext/lynyrd
-    git subrepo clone git@github.com/you/skynyrd ext/skynyrd --branch=1975
-
-What these commands do (at a high level) should be obvious. They "clone" (add)
-the repos content into the subdirectories you told them to. The details of
-what is happening to your repo will be discussed later, but adding new
-subrepos is easy. If you need to update the subrepos later:
-
-    git subrepo pull ext/lynyrd
-    git subrepo pull ext/skynyrd --branch=1976
-
-The lynyrd repo is tracking the upstream master branch, and you've changed the
-skynyrd subrepo to the 1976 branch. Since these subrepos are owned by 'you',
-you might want to change them in the context of your freebird repo. When
-things are working, you can push the subrepo changes back:
-
-    git subrepo push ext/lynyrd
-    git subrepo push ext/skynyrd
-
-Looks simple right? It's supposed to be. The intent of C<subrepo> is to do the
-right things, and to not cause problems.
-
-Of course there's more to it under the hood, and that's what the rest of this
-article is about.
-
-=head2 Git Submodules
-
-Submodules tend to receive a lot of bad press. Here's some of it:
-
-=over
-
-=item * L<http://ayende.com/blog/4746/the-problem-with-git-submodules>
-
-=item * L<http://somethingsinistral.net/blog/git-submodules-are-probably-not-the-answer/>
-
-=item * L<http://codingkilledthecat.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/why-your-company-shouldnt-use-git-submodules/>
-
-=back
-
-A quick recap of some of the good and bad things about submodules:
-
-Good:
-
-=over
-
-=item * Use an external repo in a dedicated subdir of your project.
-
-=item * Pin the external repo to a specific commit.
-
-=item * The C<git-submodule> command is a core part of the Git project.
-
-=back
-
-Bad:
-
-=over
-
-=item * Users have to know a repo has submodules.
-
-=item * Users have to get the subrepos manually.
-
-=item * Pulling a repo with submodules won't pull in the new submodule changes.
-
-=item * A submodule will break if the referenced repo goes away.
-
-=item * A submodule will break if a forced push removes the referenced commit.
-
-=item * Can't use different submodules/commits per main project branch.
-
-=item * Can't "try out" a submodule on alternate branch.
-
-=item * Main repo can be pushed upstream pointing to unpushed submod commits.
-
-=item * Command capability differs across Git versions.
-
-=item * Often need to change remote url, to push submodule changes upstream.
-
-=item * Removing or renaming a submodule requires many steps.
-
-=back
-
-Internally, submodules are a real mess. They give the strong impression of
-being bolted on, well after Git was designed. Some commands are aware of the
-existence of submodules (although usually half-heartedly), and many commands
-are oblivious. For instance the git-clone command has a C<--recursive> option
-to clone all subrepos, but it's not a default, so you still need to be aware
-of the need. The git-checkout command does nothing with the submodules, even
-if they are intended to differ across branches.
-
-Let's talk a bit about how submodules are implemented in Git. Information
-about them is stored in 3 different places (in the top level repo directory):
-
-=over
-
-=item * C<.gitmodules>
-
-=item * C<.git/config>
-
-=item * C<.git/modules> — The submodule repo's meta data (refs/objects)
-
-=back
-
-So some of the information lives in the repo history (.gitmodules), but other
-info (.git/) is only known to the local repo.
-
-In addition, the submodule introduces a new low level concept, to the
-commitI<tree>blob graph. Normally a git tree object points to blob (file)
-objects and more tree (directory) objects. Submodules have tree objects point
-to B<commit> objects. While this seems clever and somewhat reasonable, it also
-means that every other git command (which was built on the super clean Git
-data model) has to be aware of this new possibility (and deal with it
-appropriately).
-
-The point is that, while submodules are a real need, and a lot of work has
-gone into making them work decently, they are essentially a kludge to the Git
-model, and it is quite understandable why they haven't worked out as well as
-people would expect.
-
-NOTE: Submodules I<are> getting better with each release of Git, but it's
-      still an endless catch up game.
-
-=head2 Git Subtrees
-
-One day, someone decided to think different. Instead of pointing to external
-repos, why not just include them into the main repo (but also allow them to be
-pulled and pushed separately as needed)?
-
-At first this may feel like a wasteful approach. Why keep other repos
-physically inside your main one? But if you think about it abstractly, what's
-the difference? You want your users and collaborators to have all this code
-because your project needs it. So why worry about how it happens? In the end,
-the choice is yours, but I've grown very comfortable with this concept and
-I'll try to justify it well. I should note that the first paragraph of the
-C<submodule> doc suggests considering this alternative.
-
-The big win here is that you can do this using the existing git model. Nothing
-new is added. You are just adding commits to a history. You can do it
-different on every branch. You can merge branches sensibly.
-
-The git-subtree command seems to have been inspired by Git's subtree merge
-strategy, which it uses internally, and possibly got its name from. A subtree
-merge allows you to take a completely separate Git history and make it be a
-subdirectory of your repo.
-
-Adding a subtree was the easy part. All that needed to be done after that was
-to figure out a way to pull upstream changes and push local ones back
-upstream. And that's what the C<git-subtree> command does.
-
-So what's the problem with git-subtree then?
-
-Well unfortunately, it drops a few balls. The main problems come down to an
-overly complicated commandline UX, poor collaborator awareness, and a fragile
-and messy implementation.
-
-Good:
-
-=over
-
-=item * Use an external repo in a dedicated subdir of your project.
-
-=item * Pin the external repo to a specific commit.
-
-=item * Users get everything with a normal clone command.
-
-=item * Users don't need to know that subtrees are involved.
-
-=item * Can use different submodules/commits per main project branch.
-
-=item * Users don't need the subtree command. Only owners and collaborators.
-
-=back
-
-Bad:
-
-=over
-
-=item * The remote url and branch info is not saved (except in the history).
-
-=item * Owners and collaborators have to enter the remote for every command.
-
-=item * Collaborators aren't made aware that subtrees are involved.
-
-=item * Pulled history is not squashed by default.
-
-=item * Creates a messy historical view. (See below)
-
-=item * Bash code is complicated.
-
-=item * Only one test file. Currently is failing.
-
-=back
-
-As you can see, subtree makes quite a few things better, but after trying it
-for a while, the experience was more annoying than submodules. For example,
-consider this usage:
-
-    $ git subtree add --squash --prefix=foo git@github.com:my/thing mybranch
-    # weeks go by…
-    $ git subtree pull --squash --prefix=foo git@github.com:my/thing mybranch
-    # time to push local subtree changes back upstream
-    $ git subtree push --prefix=foo git@github.com:my/thing mybranch
-
-The first thing you notice is the overly verbose syntax. It's justified in the
-first command, but in the other 2 commands I really don't want to have to
-remember what the remote and branch are that I'm using.
-
-Moreover, my collaborators have no idea that subtrees are involved, let alone
-where they came from.
-
-Consider the equivalent subrepo commands:
-
-    $ git subrepo clone git@github.com:my/thing foo -b mybranch
-    $ git subrepo pull foo
-    $ git subrepo push foo
-
-Collaborators see a file called 'foo/.gitrepo', and know that the subdir is a
-subrepo. The file contains all the information needed by future commands
-applied to that subrepo.
-
-=head2 Git Subrepos
-
-Now is a good time to dive into the techinical aspects of the C<subrepo>
-command, but first let me explain how it came about.
-
-As you may have surmised by now, I am the author of git-subrepo. I'd used
-submodules on and off for years, and when I became aware of subtree I gave it
-a try, but I quickly realized its problems. I decided maybe it could be
-improved. I decided to write down my expected commandline usage and my ideals
-of what it would and would not do. Then I set off to implement it. It's been a
-long road, but what I ended up with was even better than what I wanted from
-the start.
-
-Let's review the Goods and Bads:
-
-Good:
-
-=over
-
-=item * Use an external repo in a dedicated subdir of your project.
-
-=item * Pin the external repo to a specific commit.
-
-=item * Users get everything with a normal clone command.
-
-=item * Users don't need to know that subrepos are involved.
-
-=item * Can use different submodules/commits per main project branch.
-
-=item * Meta info is kept in an obvious place.
-
-=item * Everyone knows when a subdir is a subrepo.
-
-=item * Commandline UX is minimal and intuitive.
-
-=item * Pulled history is always squashed out locally.
-
-=item * Pushed history is kept intact.
-
-=item * Creates a clean historical view. (See below)
-
-=item * Bash code is very simple and easy to follow.
-
-=item * Comprehensive test suite. Currently passing on travis:
-
-=back
-
-=for html
-<a href="https://travis-ci.org/ingydotnet/git-subrepo"><img src="https://travis-ci.org/ingydotnet/git-subrepo.png" alt="git-subrepo"></a>
-
-Bad:
-
-=over
-
-=item * --Subrepo is very new.-- (no longer true)
-
-=item * --Not well tested in the wild.-- (no longer true)
-
-=back
-
-This review may seem somewhat slanted, but I honestly am not aware of any
-"bad" points that I'm not disclosing. That said, I am sure time will reveal
-bugs and shortcomings. Those can usually be fixed. Hopefully the B<model> is
-correct, because that's harder to fix down the road.
-
-OK. So how does it all work?
-
-There are 3 main commands: cloneI<pull>push. Let's start with the clone
-command. This is the easiest part. You give it a remote url, possibly a new
-subdir to put it, and possibly a remote branch to use. I say possibly, because
-the command can guess the subdir name (just like the git-clone command does),
-and the branch can be the upstream default branch.
-
-Given this we do the following steps internally:
-
-=over
-
-=item * Fetch the remote content (for a specific refspec)
-
-=item * Read the remote head tree into the index
-
-=item * Checkout the index into the new subdir
-
-=item * Create a new subrepo commit object for the subdir content
-
-=item * Add a state file called .gitrepo to the new subrepo/subdir
-
-=item * Amend the merge commit with this new file
-
-=back
-
-This process adds something like this to the top of your history:
-
-    * 9b6ddc9 git subrepo clone git@github.com:you/foo.git foo/
-    * 37c61a5 Previous head commit of your repo
-
-The entire history has been squashed down into one commit, and placed on
-top of your history. This is important as it keeps your history as clean
-as possible. You don't need to have the subrepo history in your main
-project, since it is immutably available elsewhere, and you have a pointer
-to that place.
-
-The new foo/.gitrepo file looks like this:
-
-    [subrepo]
-            remote = git@github.com:you/foo.git
-            branch = master
-            commit = 14c96c6931b41257b2d42b2edc67ddc659325823
-            parent = 37c61a5a234f5dd6f5c2aec037509f50d3a79b8f
-            cmdver = 0.1.0
-
-It contains all the info needed now and later. Note that the repo url is the
-generally pushable form, rather than the publically readable (L<https://…)>
-form. This is the best practice. Users of your repo don't need access to this
-url, because the content is already in your repo. Only you and your
-collaborators need this url to pull/push in the future.
-
-The next command is the pull command. Normally you just give it the subrepo's
-subdir path (although you can change the branch with -b), and it will get the
-other info from the subdir/.gitrepo file.
-
-The pull command does these steps:
-
-=over
-
-=item * Fetch the upstream content
-
-=item * Check if anything needs pulling
-
-=item * Create a branch of local subrepo commits since last pull
-
-=item * Rebase this branch onto the upstream commits
-
-=item * Commit the HEAD of the rebased content
-
-=item * Update/amend the .gitrepo file
-
-=back
-
-=head3 Clean History
-
-I've talked a bit about clean history but let me show you a comparison between
-subrepo and subtree. Let's run this command sequence using both methods. Note
-the differences between I<both> the command syntax required, and the branch
-history produced.
-
-Subrepo first:
-
-    $ git subrepo clone git@github.com:user/abc
-    $ git subrepo clone git@github.com:user/def xyz
-    $ git subrepo pull abc
-    $ git subrepo pull xyz
-
-The resulting history is:
-
-    * b1f60cc subrepo pull xyz
-    * 4fb0276 subrepo pull abc
-    * bcef2a0 subrepo clone git@github.com:user/def xyz
-    * bebf0db subrepo clone git@github.com:user/abc
-    * 64eeaa6 (origin/master, origin/HEAD) O HAI FREND
-
-Compare that to B<subtree>. This:
-
-    $ git subtree add abc git@github.com:user/abc master
-    $ git subtree add xyz git@github.com:user/def master
-    $ git subtree pull abc git@github.com:user/abc master
-    $ git subtree pull xyz git@github.com:user/def master
-
-Produces this:
-
-    * 739e45a (HEAD, master) Merge commit '5f563469d886d53e19cb908b3a64e4229f88a2d1'
-    |\
-    | * 5f56346 Squashed 'xyz/' changes from 08c7421..365409f
-    * | 641f5e5 Merge commit '8d88e90ce5f653ed2e7608a71b8693a2174ea62a'
-    |\ \
-    | * | 8d88e90 Squashed 'abc/' changes from 08c7421..365409f
-    * | | 1703ed2 Merge commit '0e091b672c4bbbbf6bc4f6694c475d127ffa21eb' as 'xyz'
-    |\ \ \
-    | | |/
-    | |/|
-    | * | 0e091b6 Squashed 'xyz/' content from commit 08c7421
-    | /
-    * | 07b77e7 Merge commit 'cd2b30a0229d931979ed4436b995875ec563faea' as 'abc'
-    |\ \
-    | |/
-    | * cd2b30a Squashed 'abc/' content from commit 08c7421
-    * 64eeaa6 (origin/master, origin/HEAD) O HAI FREND
-
-This was from a minimal case. Subtree history (when viewed this way at least)
-gets unreasonably ugly fast. Subrepo history, by contrast, always looks as
-clean as shown.
-
-The final command, push, bascially just does the pull/rebase dance above
-described, and pushes the resulting history back. It does not squash the
-commits made locally, because it assumed that when you changed the local
-subrepo, you made messages that were intended to eventually be published
-back upstream.
-
-=head2 Conflict Resolution
-
-The commands described above can also be done "by hand". If something fails
-during a pull or push (generally in the rebasing) then the command will tell
-you what to do to finish up.
-
-You might choose to do everything by hand, and do your own merging strategies.
-This is perfectly reasonable. The C<subrepo> command offers a few other helper
-commands to help you get the job done:
-
-=over
-
-=item * C<fetch> - Fetch the upstream and create a C<< subrepo/remote/<subdir> >> ref.
-
-=item * C<branch> - Create a branch of local subdir commits since the last pull, called C<< subrepo/<subdir> >>.
-
-=item * C<commit> - Commit a merged branch's HEAD back into your repo.
-
-=item * C<status> - Show lots of useful info about the current state of the subrepos.
-
-=item * C<clean> - Remove branches, ref and remotes created by subrepo commands.
-
-=item * C<help> - Read the complete documentation!
-
-=back
-
-=head2 Conclusion
-
-Hopefully by now, you see that submodules are a painful choice with a dubious
-future, and that subtree, while a solid idea has many usage issues.
-
-Give C<subrepo> a try. It's painless, easily revertable and just might be what
-the doctor ordered.
-
-=head2 Reference Links
-
-=over
-
-=item * L<http://longair.net/blog/2010/06/02/git-submodules-explained/>
-
-=item * L<http://blogs.atlassian.com/2013/05/alternatives-to-git-submodule-git-subtree/>
-
-=back
-
-=cut