asciidoc-pubkit 1.0.1 → 1.0.2

checksums.yaml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 SHA256:
-  metadata.gz: 11ce21a9f9688e6a959a5a4ffbb4479876739d6f901d0b50f383b1742d1bc620
-  data.tar.gz: 407e838b2f9034dc7c1d085331c23a8fd91eeaa87b6f148dc89b8c732a9ff8af
+  metadata.gz: 905d849fe8f73050f29a9a30178a97487220b732b9d4b512e239708cd4141183
+  data.tar.gz: 49fda58238752aa5428f5ae01dcecd2ee064647686f42e98daf36cf47114d67b
 SHA512:
-  metadata.gz: 69ce04953e4caae4f349bfa9874783588d34b7927fb773f5cd8bf9b1d09980e8ff4bfb66baeb8b02f5e7f2e7d720317d29b21678861ed2ebc2619e069ee03d72
-  data.tar.gz: 3468c4e3b094003f25892d1b5197327df659fe4ea08180e45b93ebdaeedec6ce1a07e832be80526cb0d949219c71f5ccbbf7082c83e765197adf8dae843c45e7
+  metadata.gz: 1f4faad90e82bbfcdff69672807169610db35c9eb36d0863f32e5a3d44af97e2d67ebdcdea6505197a3163cc65c3eed2232dc236f2078415776acfe60358bfcf
+  data.tar.gz: 99c3dc7d0c57ac49d05340e29e4a224eb2676a3a26ba52c6ad2f44691dfa7e8cf3b74b82992bffa7eaa3e714098caf236cf21e7b4f6eab4bd2d56dd369e07330

data/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,16 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## 1.0.2 — 2026-10-05
+
+- Add contextual prose candidates for 分かる, 置く, 変える, 発火, 短い, and 長い,
+  including MeCab potential forms of 作る such as 作れます. Preserve inflection,
+  negation, allow lists, and protected inline content; these are review hints,
+  not prohibited words or automatic replacements.
+- Extend development revision calibration from 20 to 31 pairs with operation,
+  capability, comparison, reference, dependency, and responsibility distinctions.
+  Include faithful revisions and unresolved evidence as controls; automated
+  fixture tests do not establish AI editorial accuracy.
+
 ## 1.0.1 — 2026-10-05
 
 - Explain the project's publishing background and link the book catalogs without

data/README.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ and books on health, exercise, and sports science published under
 The experience informs the toolkit's writing criteria, contextual review prompts,
 and checks for preserving manuscript content during revision.
 
-Version 1.0.1 provides document inspection, explicit prose-only mechanical
+Version 1.0.2 provides document inspection, explicit prose-only mechanical
 replacements, and Japanese manuscript review. Inspect a book's outline,
 metadata, and local cross-references; preview and apply your replacement rules;
 then review and verify edits against a saved baseline.
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Japanese manuscript excerpts and rule terms retain their original text.
 
 ## Available features
 
-The following commands are available in version 1.0.1.
+The following commands are available in version 1.0.2.
 
 | Feature | Commands | Behavior |
 | --- | --- | --- |
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ The following commands are available in version 1.0.1.
 | [Manuscript scoring](docs/scoring.md#score-an-asciidoc-manuscript) | `review score` | Report a prose candidate-density score; explicit `--agent codex` or `--agent claude` optionally invokes a local AI CLI for readability ratings |
 | [Writing criteria and prompts](docs/writing.md#writing-commands) | `writing criteria`, `writing prompt` | Print Japanese prose criteria or generate a writing prompt without a manuscript or MeCab |
 
-Version 1.0.1 extends the [shared writing criteria](docs/writing.md#writing-commands)
+Version 1.0.1 extended the [shared writing criteria](docs/writing.md#writing-commands)
 with structural comparison before and after revision and preservation of sentence
 functions and plain or polite style. The [development evaluation](docs/prose-evaluation.md)
 includes new cases for these checks.
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ installed AI CLI, which may use its configured model provider.
 Findings are review candidates; verification checks mechanical preservation and
 keeps `meaning_verified: false`. The CLI does not publish books or provide EPUB,
 image, or book scaffolding commands.
+The packaged prose rules also flag broad operation and degree wording such as
+`分かる`, `置く`, `変える`, `発火`, `短い`, `長い`, and `作れます` for contextual
+review. Precise everyday language may remain; see the [review guide](docs/review-workflow.md).
 
 ## Install
 
@@ -78,7 +81,7 @@ asciidoc-pubkit --help
 ```
 
 To update, run `gem update asciidoc-pubkit`. For Bundler, add
-`gem 'asciidoc-pubkit', '~> 1.0.1'` to your project's `Gemfile` and run commands
+`gem 'asciidoc-pubkit', '~> 1.0.2'` to your project's `Gemfile` and run commands
 through `bundle exec`. See [source installation and local checkout usage](docs/installation.md).
 
 ## Quick start
@@ -118,7 +121,7 @@ asciidoc-pubkit writing prompt --lang ja --output writing-prompt.md
 
 Existing review sessions require the exact tool version that created them.
 Before upgrading, finish ongoing reviews with that version or preserve their
-baselines and start a new review in a separate directory with v1.0.1. A new
+baselines and start a new review in a separate directory with v1.0.2. A new
 scan cannot verify preservation relative to an earlier baseline.
 
 ## Documentation

data/data/review-rules.ja.yml

@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ terms:
     # Review context before choosing a katakana technical term.
     - 木
     - 余白
+    # Event or operation wording requires context, not a fixed synonym.
+    - 発火
     question: Identify the concrete referent, components, role, or measurable work.
       For 入口, apply the shared role-metaphor criteria; a clear referent alone is
       not a sufficient reason to keep vague operation wording. Keep
@@ -51,6 +53,9 @@ terms:
     - 意味しません
     - 把握します
     - 捉えます
+    - 分かる
+    - 分かります
+    - 分かりません
     # Writing, representation, and inspection.
     - 記述します
     - 記述できます
@@ -79,6 +84,9 @@ terms:
     # Construction, preparation, and combination.
     - 用意します
     - 作ります
+    - 作れる
+    - 作れます
+    - 作れません
     - 組み立てられます
     - 組み合わせます
     - 積み重なります
@@ -104,6 +112,12 @@ terms:
     - 決まります
     # Change, transfer, and retention.
     - 変わります
+    - 変える
+    - 変えます
+    - 置く
+    - 置きます
+    - 発火します
+    - 発火させます
     - 書き換える
     - 置き換えます
     - 加えます
@@ -131,6 +145,8 @@ terms:
     terms:
     - 浅い
     - 深い
+    - 短い
+    - 長い
     question: Identify the concrete depth, level, scope, or comparison. Keep literal
       measurements and established technical meanings.
   contextual-phrase:
@@ -241,6 +257,12 @@ verbs:
   - 見落とす
   示す:
   - 示す
+  分かる:
+  - 分かる
+  置く:
+  - 置く
+  変える:
+  - 変える
   変わる:
   - 変わる
   分ける:
@@ -311,6 +333,7 @@ verbs:
   - 調べる
   作る:
   - 作る
+  - 作れる
   抜ける:
   - 抜ける
   捉える:
@@ -331,6 +354,7 @@ verbs:
   ある:
   - ある
 sahen:
+- 発火
 - 利用
 - 整理
 - 把握

data/docs/document-commands.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Document commands
 
-Version 1.0.1 provides four read-only document commands. They require neither
+Version 1.0.2 provides four read-only document commands. They require neither
 MeCab nor an AI CLI, accept documents in any language, and do not create review
 sessions or change manuscripts.
 

data/docs/installation.md

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Add the gem to your project's `Gemfile` to manage its version with Bundler:
 
 ```ruby
 source 'https://rubygems.org'
-gem 'asciidoc-pubkit', '~> 1.0.1'
+gem 'asciidoc-pubkit', '~> 1.0.2'
 ```
 
 Then install dependencies and run the CLI through Bundler:
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ git clone https://github.com/cybergarage/asciidoc-pubkit.git
 cd asciidoc-pubkit
 bundle install
 gem build asciidoc-pubkit.gemspec
-gem install ./asciidoc-pubkit-1.0.1.gem
+gem install ./asciidoc-pubkit-1.0.2.gem
 asciidoc-pubkit --version
 ```
 

data/docs/prose-evaluation.md

@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ criteria changes against a project-defined baseline. Keep detection performance,
 readability, and meaning preservation separate so that a clearer rewrite cannot
 hide a lost condition or invented fact.
 
-This guide describes the version 1.0.1 development checkout, including the
-`technical-prose-v2` corpus and criteria update. The evaluation runner is not an
+This guide describes version 1.0.2, including the
+`technical-prose-v2` corpus and expanded revision calibration. The evaluation runner is not an
 installed gem command. It does not measure Japanese naturalness or AI authorship
 as a single validated score.
 
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ of Japanese writing.
 | [prose_benchmark.ja.adoc](../test/fixtures/prose_benchmark.ja.adoc) | 21 paragraphs used as the actual AsciiDoc input |
 | [prose_benchmark.ja.json](../test/fixtures/prose_benchmark.ja.json) | Matching paragraph IDs and text, 11 annotated detector targets, and preservation checklists |
 | [prose_benchmark.yml](../test/fixtures/prose_benchmark.yml) | Fixed empty configuration that isolates the benchmark from discovered manuscript settings |
-| [prose_evaluation.ja.json](../test/fixtures/prose_evaluation.ja.json) | Detection examples and 20 manual revision pairs with expected `accept`, `reject`, or `needs-evidence` dispositions |
+| [prose_evaluation.ja.json](../test/fixtures/prose_evaluation.ja.json) | Detection examples and 31 manual revision pairs with expected `accept`, `reject`, or `needs-evidence` dispositions |
 
 The corpus includes framing such as `重要なのは`, metaphorical operations such
 as `地味に効く`, inflected and negative forms, and repeated endings. Controls
@@ -66,6 +66,17 @@ incorrectly extended to audit logging, independent checks made conditional, and
 an unsolicited change from plain to polite style. Acceptable pairs and unresolved
 cases prevent calibration from treating every change as an error.
 
+Eleven further pairs cover path length changed into performance, capability
+expanded into reuse, reconstruction changed into guaranteed shortening,
+separate operations claimed to be independent, references changed into loaded
+content, optional inheritance made mandatory, user-side storage assumed local,
+and policy definition confused with enforcement. Controls retain precise plain
+verbs or replace relative wording with supported counts and event operations.
+Unsupported details use `needs-evidence`; contradictions and lost explicit
+conditions use `reject`. These are original editorial fixtures, not manuscript
+excerpts. The 21-paragraph corpus and judge rubric are unchanged, but the changed
+calibration fingerprint requires a new AI baseline for comparison.
+
 ## What normal tests check
 
 Run the complete suite from the repository root with MeCab and UTF-8 IPADIC

data/docs/review-workflow.md

@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ manuscripts. Numeric title changes
 are manual-review notices, and remaining candidates do not fail verification.
 `meaning_verified` remains `false`.
 
-Version 1.0.1 uses session schema 3 and requires the exact tool version saved in
+Version 1.0.2 uses session schema 3 and requires the exact tool version saved in
 the session. Preserve or finish an ongoing review with its original tool before
 establishing a new baseline in a separate directory.
 `review score` continues to support prose only and rejects `--scope`.
@@ -188,6 +188,17 @@ one-based Unicode source columns. MeCab remains the default; only explicit
 
 ### Prompt
 
+Version 1.0.2 adds packaged prose candidates for
+`分かる`, `置く`, `変える`, `発火`, `短い`, `長い`, and potential forms of `作る`
+such as `作れます`. MeCab detects configured lemmas with inflection and negation;
+literal mode matches only the explicitly registered surfaces. `発火` is also a
+noun candidate, for example in a condition description.
+These hints ask for context, not formal synonyms: a short path does not establish
+low resource use, and an available operation does not establish reuse. Keep
+precise plain verbs, literal lengths, and established event terminology when
+appropriate. Allow lists and inline protection still apply. Custom rules replace
+the packaged set, and existing sessions keep their saved rules.
+
 ```sh
 asciidoc-pubkit review prompt .pubkit/review --mode revise --output review-prompt.md
 asciidoc-pubkit review prompt .pubkit/review --mode diagnose

data/docs/rules-and-coverage.md

@@ -131,13 +131,13 @@ reports analyzer changes instead of treating results from different dictionaries
 as directly comparable. Prompt generation uses saved evidence and does not need
 MeCab. Changed rules or dictionary settings require a new scan.
 
-Version 1.0.1 uses session schema 3.
+Version 1.0.2 uses session schema 3.
 Sessions with a different schema or tool version cannot be loaded. Keep the original baseline for
 an ongoing review and finish it with the original version, or start a new review
 pass in a different directory:
 
 ```sh
-asciidoc-pubkit review scan book.adoc --output .pubkit/review-1.0.1
+asciidoc-pubkit review scan book.adoc --output .pubkit/review-1.0.2
 ```
 
 Severity describes review priority, not proof of an error. There is no AI-authorship

data/docs/writing.md

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ asciidoc-pubkit writing prompt --lang ja --output writing-prompt.md
 ```
 
 For example, `--lang en` exits with an unsupported-language error. No English
-review or writing criteria are shipped in 1.0.1.
+review or writing criteria are shipped in 1.0.2.
 
 For a small trial, use `examples/book.adoc` as the scan input. Its Japanese
 paragraphs deliberately contain review candidates; its code block must remain

data/lib/asciidoc_pubkit.rb

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ require 'pathname'
 require 'optparse'
 
 module AsciidocPubkit
-  VERSION = '1.0.1'
+  VERSION = '1.0.2'
   class Error < StandardError; end
 
   def self.hash_text(text)

metadata

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 --- !ruby/object:Gem::Specification
 name: asciidoc-pubkit
 version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version
-  version: 1.0.1
+  version: 1.0.2
 platform: ruby
 authors:
 - CyberGarage