xfem 2.1.2607.dev7__tar.gz → 2.1.2607.dev9__tar.gz

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (259) hide show
  1. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/PKG-INFO +3 -3
  2. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/README.md +1 -1
  3. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/cutintegral.cpp +2 -2
  4. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/python_cutint.cpp +2 -2
  5. xfem-2.1.2607.dev9/doc/literature.md +234 -0
  6. xfem-2.1.2607.dev9/doc/literature.yaml +1128 -0
  7. xfem-2.1.2607.dev9/doc/make_literature.py +380 -0
  8. xfem-2.1.2607.dev9/doc/sphinx/_static/literature.css +212 -0
  9. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/sphinx/conf.py +15 -2
  10. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/sphinx/contents.rst +0 -2
  11. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/sphinx/requirements.txt +1 -0
  12. xfem-2.1.2607.dev9/doc/sphinx/xfem_misc/literature.rst +8 -0
  13. xfem-2.1.2607.dev9/doc/sphinx/xfem_misc/literature_entries.rst +917 -0
  14. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/python/_version.py +3 -3
  15. xfem-2.1.2607.dev7/doc/literature.md +0 -130
  16. xfem-2.1.2607.dev7/doc/sphinx/xfem_misc/literature.rst +0 -27
  17. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/.ci/build_pip.sh +0 -0
  18. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/.ci/build_pip_mac.sh +0 -0
  19. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/.ci/ci_ctests.sh +0 -0
  20. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/.ci/fix_auditwheel_policy.py +0 -0
  21. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/.github/workflows/extras-workflow.yml +0 -0
  22. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/.github/workflows/paper-workflow.yml +0 -0
  23. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/.github/workflows/pypi.yml +0 -0
  24. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/.gitignore +0 -0
  25. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/.gitlab-ci.yml +0 -0
  26. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/.gitmodules +0 -0
  27. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/CMakeLists.txt +0 -0
  28. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/Dockerfile +0 -0
  29. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/INSTALLATION.md +0 -0
  30. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/LICENSE +0 -0
  31. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/MANIFEST.in +0 -0
  32. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/_ngsolve_deps_provider.py +0 -0
  33. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cmake_modules/check_submodules.cmake +0 -0
  34. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cmake_modules/cmake_uninstall.cmake.in +0 -0
  35. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/config.h.cmake +0 -0
  36. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/CMakeLists.txt +0 -0
  37. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/cutintegral.hpp +0 -0
  38. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/fieldeval.cpp +0 -0
  39. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/fieldeval.hpp +0 -0
  40. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/lsetintdomain.cpp +0 -0
  41. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/lsetintdomain.hpp +0 -0
  42. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/mlsetintegration.cpp +0 -0
  43. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/mlsetintegration.hpp +0 -0
  44. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/spacetimecutrule.cpp +0 -0
  45. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/spacetimecutrule.hpp +0 -0
  46. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/straightcutrule.cpp +0 -0
  47. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/straightcutrule.hpp +0 -0
  48. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/xdecompose.cpp +0 -0
  49. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/xdecompose.hpp +0 -0
  50. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/xintegration.cpp +0 -0
  51. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/cutint/xintegration.hpp +0 -0
  52. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/CMakeLists.txt +0 -0
  53. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/README.md +0 -0
  54. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/aggregates/aggfem_shapetester.py +0 -0
  55. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/aggregates/fictdom_aggfem.py +0 -0
  56. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/aggregates/fictdom_dg_aggfem.py +0 -0
  57. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/fictdom.py +0 -0
  58. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/fictdom_dg.py +0 -0
  59. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/fictdom_mlset.py +0 -0
  60. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/compp1prolong-playground.py +0 -0
  61. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/cutint/area_of_a_circle_quads.py +0 -0
  62. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/cutint/integrate_one_big_quad2D.py +0 -0
  63. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/cutint/integrate_one_big_quad3D.py +0 -0
  64. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/fictdom_dg3d.py +0 -0
  65. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/lsetcurving/integrate.py +0 -0
  66. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/make_uniform3D_grid.py +0 -0
  67. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mg_cut_poisson_p1.py +0 -0
  68. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mg_cut_poisson_p1p2_skinny.py +0 -0
  69. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mg_cut_poisson_p2.py +0 -0
  70. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mg_cut_poisson_p2_skinny.py +0 -0
  71. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mg_p1_working.py +0 -0
  72. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/cube.py +0 -0
  73. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/cube2.py +0 -0
  74. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/cube_codim2_test.py +0 -0
  75. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/even_simpler.py +0 -0
  76. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/multiple_triangles.py +0 -0
  77. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/simple.py +0 -0
  78. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/simple_mlcutinfo.py +0 -0
  79. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/simple_with_convinience.py +0 -0
  80. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/square.py +0 -0
  81. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/tensor_functions.py +0 -0
  82. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/test_GetOuterBoundary.py +0 -0
  83. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/test_draw.py +0 -0
  84. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/triangle.py +0 -0
  85. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/zalesak_disk.py +0 -0
  86. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/mlset/zalesak_sphere.py +0 -0
  87. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/p1prolong-playground.py +0 -0
  88. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/p2prolong-playground.py +0 -0
  89. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/graveyard/stokesxfem.py +0 -0
  90. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/linelasticity.py +0 -0
  91. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/lsetcurv_boundary.py +0 -0
  92. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/lsetgeoms.py +0 -0
  93. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/moving_domain.py +0 -0
  94. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/mpi/mpi_nxfem.py +0 -0
  95. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/IF_circle.py +0 -0
  96. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/IF_marking.py +0 -0
  97. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/IF_periodic.py +0 -0
  98. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/area_of_a_hypersphere_ST.py +0 -0
  99. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/area_of_a_hypersphere_ST_conv.py +0 -0
  100. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/area_of_a_hypersphere_ST_conv_higher_order.py +0 -0
  101. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/area_of_a_sphere_ST.py +0 -0
  102. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/area_of_a_sphere_ST_conv.py +0 -0
  103. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/area_of_a_sphere_ST_conv_higher_order.py +0 -0
  104. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/fictdomain_Neumann_quad_testing.py +0 -0
  105. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/kite3D_in_sympy.py +0 -0
  106. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/kite_in_sympy.py +0 -0
  107. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/spaceP1_timeDGP1_3D.py +0 -0
  108. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/spaceP1_timeDGP1_3D_static.py +0 -0
  109. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/spaceP1_timeDGP1_kite.py +0 -0
  110. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/spaceP1_timeDGP1_kite3D.py +0 -0
  111. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/spaceP2_timeDGP1.py +0 -0
  112. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/spaceP2_timeDGP1_new.py +0 -0
  113. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/graveyard/spacePX_timeDGP1_kite.py +0 -0
  114. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/spaceDGtimeDG_unfitted.py +0 -0
  115. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/spaceDGtimeDG_unfitted_3D.py +0 -0
  116. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/spacetimeCG_unfitted.py +0 -0
  117. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/spacetimeDG_fitted.py +0 -0
  118. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/spacetimeDG_fitted_Nitsche.py +0 -0
  119. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/spacetimeDG_unfitted.py +0 -0
  120. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/spacetime_geom_error.py +0 -0
  121. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spacetime/spacetime_vtk.py +0 -0
  122. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/spdes/surfstokestracefem.py +0 -0
  123. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/stokescutfem.py +0 -0
  124. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/tracefem.py +0 -0
  125. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/demos/unf_interf_prob.py +0 -0
  126. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/feature-details.md +0 -0
  127. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/bubble-coarse.pdf +0 -0
  128. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/cuttet-quadrature.png +0 -0
  129. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/graveyard/cut_quadrature.png +0 -0
  130. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/graveyard/cut_quadrature_mlset.png +0 -0
  131. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/graveyard/cuttet.jpg +0 -0
  132. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/graveyard/intpoints.jpg +0 -0
  133. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/graveyard/spacetime1.png +0 -0
  134. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/graveyard/spacetime2.png +0 -0
  135. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/graveyard/zdisc-cut-elements.png +0 -0
  136. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/lsetcurv.jpg +0 -0
  137. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/mlset.png +0 -0
  138. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/patches.png +0 -0
  139. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/spacetime.png +0 -0
  140. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/twophase.pdf +0 -0
  141. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/unfittedmesh.jpg +0 -0
  142. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/xfem.jpg +0 -0
  143. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/graphics/xfes.png +0 -0
  144. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/latex.template +0 -0
  145. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/lit-ngsxfem.bib +0 -0
  146. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/sphinx/_static/custom.css +0 -0
  147. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/sphinx/bullets.css +0 -0
  148. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/sphinx/index.rst +0 -0
  149. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/sphinx/jupyter/index.rst +0 -0
  150. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/sphinx/xfem_misc/demos.rst +0 -0
  151. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/sphinx/xfem_misc/feature-details.rst +0 -0
  152. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/doc/sphinx/xfem_misc/installation.rst +0 -0
  153. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/lsetcurving/CMakeLists.txt +0 -0
  154. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/lsetcurving/calcpointshift.cpp +0 -0
  155. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/lsetcurving/calcpointshift.hpp +0 -0
  156. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/lsetcurving/lsetrefine.cpp +0 -0
  157. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/lsetcurving/lsetrefine.hpp +0 -0
  158. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/lsetcurving/projshift.cpp +0 -0
  159. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/lsetcurving/projshift.hpp +0 -0
  160. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/lsetcurving/python_lsetcurving.cpp +0 -0
  161. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/lsetcurving/shiftedevaluate.cpp +0 -0
  162. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/lsetcurving/shiftedevaluate.hpp +0 -0
  163. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/lsetcurving/shiftintegrators.cpp +0 -0
  164. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/lsetcurving/shiftintegrators.hpp +0 -0
  165. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/ngsolve_addon.cmake +0 -0
  166. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/pyproject.toml +0 -0
  167. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/python/CMakeLists.txt +0 -0
  168. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/python/__init__.py +0 -0
  169. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/python/cutmg.py +0 -0
  170. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/python/lset_smoothblend.py +0 -0
  171. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/python/lset_spacetime.py +0 -0
  172. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/python/lsetcurv.py +0 -0
  173. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/python/mlset.py +0 -0
  174. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/python/ngs_check.py +0 -0
  175. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/python/python_ngsxfem.cpp +0 -0
  176. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/python/utils.py +0 -0
  177. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/CMakeLists.txt +0 -0
  178. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/SpaceTimeFE.cpp +0 -0
  179. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/SpaceTimeFE.hpp +0 -0
  180. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/SpaceTimeFESpace.cpp +0 -0
  181. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/SpaceTimeFESpace.hpp +0 -0
  182. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/diffopDt.cpp +0 -0
  183. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/diffopDt.hpp +0 -0
  184. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/diffopFixt.cpp +0 -0
  185. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/diffopFixt.hpp +0 -0
  186. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/python_spacetime.cpp +0 -0
  187. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/spacetime_vtk.cpp +0 -0
  188. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/spacetime_vtk.hpp +0 -0
  189. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/timecf.cpp +0 -0
  190. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/spacetime/timecf.hpp +0 -0
  191. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/CMakeLists.txt +0 -0
  192. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/ngsxfem_report.py +0 -0
  193. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_aggregates.py +0 -0
  194. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_backuprule.py +0 -0
  195. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_bndcut.py +0 -0
  196. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_calc_linearized.py +0 -0
  197. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_differential_symbol.py +0 -0
  198. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_elementlayers.py +0 -0
  199. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_intcurved.py +0 -0
  200. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_local_solve.py +0 -0
  201. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_localgeom.py +0 -0
  202. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_lsetcurv_boundary.py +0 -0
  203. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_memory_usage.py +0 -0
  204. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_mlset_integration.py +0 -0
  205. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_mlset_module_functionality.py +0 -0
  206. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_mlset_poisson.py +0 -0
  207. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_navier_stokes_2d1.py +0 -0
  208. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_ngsolve_version.py +0 -0
  209. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_nonlin.py +0 -0
  210. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_num_nxfem.py +0 -0
  211. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_nxfem.py +0 -0
  212. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_quadchallenges.py +0 -0
  213. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_shifteval.py +0 -0
  214. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_shifteval_simd.py +0 -0
  215. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_simd_cutint.py +0 -0
  216. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_simd_lf_blf.py +0 -0
  217. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_spacetime_lsetcurv.py +0 -0
  218. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_spacetime_set.py +0 -0
  219. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_spacetime_vecH1.py +0 -0
  220. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_spacetime_vtk.py +0 -0
  221. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_spacetimecutrule.py +0 -0
  222. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_straightcutrule.py +0 -0
  223. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_utils.py +0 -0
  224. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/tests/pytests/test_xfes_ndof.py +0 -0
  225. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/CMakeLists.txt +0 -0
  226. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/bitarraycf.cpp +0 -0
  227. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/bitarraycf.hpp +0 -0
  228. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/ngsxstd.cpp +0 -0
  229. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/ngsxstd.hpp +0 -0
  230. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/p1interpol.cpp +0 -0
  231. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/p1interpol.hpp +0 -0
  232. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/python_utils.cpp +0 -0
  233. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/restrictedblf.cpp +0 -0
  234. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/restrictedblf.hpp +0 -0
  235. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/restrictedfespace.cpp +0 -0
  236. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/restrictedfespace.hpp +0 -0
  237. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/spacetimechecks.hpp +0 -0
  238. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/xprolongation.cpp +0 -0
  239. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/utils/xprolongation.hpp +0 -0
  240. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/CMakeLists.txt +0 -0
  241. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/aggregates.cpp +0 -0
  242. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/aggregates.hpp +0 -0
  243. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/cutinfo.cpp +0 -0
  244. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/cutinfo.hpp +0 -0
  245. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/ghostpenalty.cpp +0 -0
  246. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/ghostpenalty.hpp +0 -0
  247. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/python_xfem.cpp +0 -0
  248. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/sFESpace.cpp +0 -0
  249. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/sFESpace.hpp +0 -0
  250. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/symboliccutbfi.cpp +0 -0
  251. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/symboliccutbfi.hpp +0 -0
  252. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/symboliccutlfi.cpp +0 -0
  253. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/symboliccutlfi.hpp +0 -0
  254. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/xFESpace.cpp +0 -0
  255. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/xFESpace.hpp +0 -0
  256. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/xfemdiffops.cpp +0 -0
  257. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/xfemdiffops.hpp +0 -0
  258. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/xfiniteelement.cpp +0 -0
  259. {xfem-2.1.2607.dev7 → xfem-2.1.2607.dev9}/xfem/xfiniteelement.hpp +0 -0
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
1
1
  Metadata-Version: 2.2
2
2
  Name: xfem
3
- Version: 2.1.2607.dev7
3
+ Version: 2.1.2607.dev9
4
4
  Summary: (ngs)xfem is an Add-on library to Netgen/NGSolve for unfitted/cut FEM.
5
5
  Author-Email: Christoph Lehrenfeld <lehrenfeld@math.uni-goettingen.de>
6
6
  Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: GNU Lesser General Public License v3 (LGPLv3)
7
7
  Project-URL: github, https://github.com/ngsxfem/ngsxfem
8
8
  Requires-Python: >=3.10
9
- Requires-Dist: ngsolve==6.2.2606
9
+ Requires-Dist: ngsolve==6.2.2608
10
10
  Provides-Extra: test
11
11
  Requires-Dist: pytest; extra == "test"
12
12
  Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ The main features of `ngsxfem` are:
45
45
  * Space-Time Finite Elements for the treatment of moving domain problems
46
46
  * All these features combined with the usual flexibility and power of [NGSolve](https://ngsolve.org).
47
47
 
48
- `ngsxfem` has been used in a variety of applications. In the document [doc/feature-details.md](doc/feature-details.md) (see also [compiled pdf](https://nightly.link/ngsxfem/ngsxfem/workflows/extras-workflow/master/doc-features.zip) ) more details on the features is given and in [doc/literature.md](doc/literature.md) (see also [literature](https://nightly.link/ngsxfem/ngsxfem/workflows/extras-workflow/master/doc-literature.zip) ) an overview of the scientific literature where `ngsxfem` is used is provided.
48
+ `ngsxfem` has been used in a variety of applications. In the document [doc/feature-details.md](doc/feature-details.md) (see also [compiled pdf](https://nightly.link/ngsxfem/ngsxfem/workflows/extras-workflow/master/doc-features.zip) ) more details on the features is given and in [doc/literature.md](doc/literature.md) (see also the [rendered literature page](https://ngsuite.pages.gwdg.de/ngsxfem/xfem_misc/literature.html) and the [compiled pdf](https://nightly.link/ngsxfem/ngsxfem/workflows/extras-workflow/master/doc-literature.zip) ) an overview of the scientific literature where `ngsxfem` is used is provided. If you have used `ngsxfem` in a publication that is missing there, please open an issue or a pull request (the list is generated from [doc/literature.yaml](doc/literature.yaml)).
49
49
 
50
50
  Not all features of `ngsxfem` and `NGSolve` can directly be combined. Here is an overview of `ngsxfem` and `NGSolve` features and if they can directly be combined:
51
51
 
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The main features of `ngsxfem` are:
32
32
  * Space-Time Finite Elements for the treatment of moving domain problems
33
33
  * All these features combined with the usual flexibility and power of [NGSolve](https://ngsolve.org).
34
34
 
35
- `ngsxfem` has been used in a variety of applications. In the document [doc/feature-details.md](doc/feature-details.md) (see also [compiled pdf](https://nightly.link/ngsxfem/ngsxfem/workflows/extras-workflow/master/doc-features.zip) ) more details on the features is given and in [doc/literature.md](doc/literature.md) (see also [literature](https://nightly.link/ngsxfem/ngsxfem/workflows/extras-workflow/master/doc-literature.zip) ) an overview of the scientific literature where `ngsxfem` is used is provided.
35
+ `ngsxfem` has been used in a variety of applications. In the document [doc/feature-details.md](doc/feature-details.md) (see also [compiled pdf](https://nightly.link/ngsxfem/ngsxfem/workflows/extras-workflow/master/doc-features.zip) ) more details on the features is given and in [doc/literature.md](doc/literature.md) (see also the [rendered literature page](https://ngsuite.pages.gwdg.de/ngsxfem/xfem_misc/literature.html) and the [compiled pdf](https://nightly.link/ngsxfem/ngsxfem/workflows/extras-workflow/master/doc-literature.zip) ) an overview of the scientific literature where `ngsxfem` is used is provided. If you have used `ngsxfem` in a publication that is missing there, please open an issue or a pull request (the list is generated from [doc/literature.yaml](doc/literature.yaml)).
36
36
 
37
37
  Not all features of `ngsxfem` and `NGSolve` can directly be combined. Here is an overview of `ngsxfem` and `NGSolve` features and if they can directly be combined:
38
38
 
@@ -176,11 +176,11 @@ TSCAL CutIntegral :: T_CutIntegrate (const ngcomp::MeshAccess & ma,
176
176
  FlatArray<SIMD<double>> simd_wei_arr = CreateSIMD_FlatArray(ns_wei_arr, lh);
177
177
  {
178
178
  SIMD_BaseMappedIntegrationRule & simd_mir = trafo(simd_ir, lh);
179
- FlatMatrix<SIMD<TSCAL>> val(simd_mir.Size(), 1, lh);
179
+ FlatMatrix<SIMD<TSCAL>> val(1, simd_mir.Size(), lh);
180
180
  cf -> Evaluate (simd_mir, val);
181
181
  SIMD<TSCAL> lsum(0.0);
182
182
  for (int i = 0; i < simd_mir.Size(); i++)
183
- lsum += simd_mir[i].GetMeasure()*simd_wei_arr[i]*val(i,0);
183
+ lsum += simd_mir[i].GetMeasure()*simd_wei_arr[i]*val(0,i);
184
184
  if (element_wise.Size())
185
185
  element_wise(el.Nr()) += HSum(lsum);
186
186
  AtomicAdd(sum, HSum(lsum));
@@ -83,13 +83,13 @@ void ExportNgsx_cutint(py::module &m)
83
83
  FlatArray<SIMD<double>> simd_wei_arr = CreateSIMD_FlatArray(ns_wei_arr, lh);
84
84
 
85
85
  SIMD_BaseMappedIntegrationRule &simd_mir = trafo(simd_ir, lh);
86
- FlatMatrix<SIMD<double>> val(simd_mir.Size(), 1, lh);
86
+ FlatMatrix<SIMD<double>> val(1, simd_mir.Size(), lh);
87
87
 
88
88
  cf -> Evaluate(simd_mir, val);
89
89
 
90
90
  SIMD<double> lsum = 0.0;
91
91
  for (int i = 0; i < simd_mir.Size(); i++)
92
- lsum += simd_mir[i].GetMeasure()*simd_wei_arr[i]*val(i,0);
92
+ lsum += simd_mir[i].GetMeasure()*simd_wei_arr[i]*val(0,i);
93
93
 
94
94
  AtomicAdd(sum,HSum(lsum));
95
95
  if (element_wise)
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ Scientific literature using `ngsxfem`
3
+ ---
4
+
5
+ <!-- This file is generated from doc/literature.yaml by doc/make_literature.py. Do not edit by hand. -->
6
+
7
+ This list collects scientific works (journal articles, preprints, theses) in which `ngsxfem` has been used. Entries are sorted by category and year (newest first); where available, links to reproduction code and data are given. If you used `ngsxfem` in your work and it is missing here, please open an issue or a pull request on [GitHub](https://github.com/ngsxfem/ngsxfem/issues) (the list is generated from `doc/literature.yaml`).
8
+
9
+ ### Citing `ngsxfem`
10
+
11
+ If you use `ngsxfem` for your research, please cite: C. Lehrenfeld, F. Heimann, J. Preuß and H. von Wahl. “ngsxfem: Add-on to NGSolve for geometrically unfitted finite element discretizations”. *Journal of Open Source Software* 6(64), 3237, 2021. doi: [10.21105/joss.03237](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03237). Software releases are archived on Zenodo: doi: [10.5281/zenodo.5081124](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5081124).
12
+
13
+ ```
14
+ @article{ngsxfem,
15
+ author = {Lehrenfeld, Christoph and Heimann, Fabian and Preu{\ss}, Janosch and von Wahl, Henry},
16
+ title = {ngsxfem: Add-on to NGSolve for geometrically unfitted finite element discretizations},
17
+ journal = {Journal of Open Source Software},
18
+ volume = {6},
19
+ number = {64},
20
+ pages = {3237},
21
+ year = {2021},
22
+ doi = {10.21105/joss.03237}
23
+ }
24
+ ```
25
+
26
+ ### Unfitted boundary value problems
27
+
28
+ Fictitious domain, CutFEM, unfitted DG and Trefftz methods for boundary value problems on level set domains, including the analysis of the higher order geometry handling.
29
+
30
+ * C. Lehrenfeld, T. van Beeck and I. Voulis. “Analysis of divergence-preserving unfitted finite element methods for the mixed Poisson problem”. *Math. Comp.* 94(354), 1667–1699, 2025. doi: [10.1090/mcom/4027](https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/4027), arXiv: [2306.12722](https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12722). Code: [GRO.data (doi: 10.25625/LYR2CG)](https://doi.org/10.25625/LYR2CG).
31
+
32
+ * M. Neilan, M. A. Olshanskii and H. von Wahl. “An unfitted divergence-free higher order finite element method for the Stokes problem”. preprint, 2025. arXiv: [2512.12050](https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12050). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/hvonwah/repro-unfitted-div-free-stokes), [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.21460130)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21460130).
33
+
34
+ * E. N. Karatzas. “hp-version analysis for arbitrarily shaped elements on the boundary discontinuous Galerkin method for Stokes systems”. *Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model.* 21(4), 528–559, 2024. doi: [10.4208/ijnam2024-1021](https://doi.org/10.4208/ijnam2024-1021), arXiv: [2301.12577](https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12577).
35
+
36
+ * F. Heimann, C. Lehrenfeld, P. Stocker and H. von Wahl. “Unfitted Trefftz discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic boundary value problems”. *ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal.* 57(5), 2803–2833, 2023. doi: [10.1051/m2an/2023064](https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2023064), arXiv: [2212.12236](https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.12236). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/hvonwah/unf-trefftz-poisson-code), [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7474688)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7474688).
37
+
38
+ * H. Liu, M. Neilan and M. A. Olshanskii. “A CutFEM divergence-free discretization for the Stokes problem”. *ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal.* 57(1), 143–165, 2023. doi: [10.1051/m2an/2022072](https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2022072), arXiv: [2110.11456](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.11456).
39
+
40
+ * A. Aretaki, E. N. Karatzas and G. Katsouleas. “Equal higher order analysis of an unfitted discontinuous Galerkin method for Stokes flow systems”. *J. Sci. Comput.* 91(2), 2022. doi: [10.1007/s10915-022-01823-w](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-022-01823-w), arXiv: [2006.00435](https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.00435).
41
+
42
+ * H. Liu. “Unfitted finite element methods for the Stokes problem using the Scott-Vogelius pair”. *PhD thesis* University of Pittsburgh, 2022. url: <http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/43584/>.
43
+
44
+ * F. Heimann and C. Lehrenfeld. “Numerical integration on hyperrectangles in isoparametric unfitted finite elements”. *Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications ENUMATH 2017* Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering 126, Springer, 193–202, 2019. doi: [10.1007/978-3-319-96415-7_16](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96415-7_16).
45
+
46
+ * C. Lehrenfeld. “A higher order isoparametric fictitious domain method for level set domains”. *Geometrically Unfitted Finite Element Methods and Applications* Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering 121, Springer, 65–92, 2017. doi: [10.1007/978-3-319-71431-8_3](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71431-8_3).
47
+
48
+ * C. Lehrenfeld. “High order unfitted finite element methods on level set domains using isoparametric mappings”. *Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.* 300, 716–733, 2016. doi: [10.1016/j.cma.2015.12.005](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.12.005).
49
+
50
+ ### Interface problems and two-phase flows
51
+
52
+ Nitsche-XFEM / CutFEM discretizations of scalar and Stokes interface problems, two-phase flows and the corresponding preconditioners.
53
+
54
+ * E. Burman and J. Preuß. “Unique continuation for an elliptic interface problem using unfitted isoparametric finite elements”. *SMAI J. Comput. Math.* 2025. doi: [10.5802/smai-jcm.122](https://doi.org/10.5802/smai-jcm.122), arXiv: [2307.05210](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05210). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/UCL/interface-uc-unfitted-iso), [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13328144)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13328144).
55
+
56
+ * D. Capatina, F. Caubet, M. Dambrine and R. Zelada. “Nitsche extended finite element method of a Ventcel transmission problem with discontinuities at the interface”. *ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal.* 59(2), 999–1021, 2025. doi: [10.1051/m2an/2025014](https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2025014).
57
+
58
+ * S. Groß and A. Reusken. “Analysis of optimal preconditioners for CutFEM”. *Numer. Linear Algebra Appl.* 30(5), e2486, 2023. doi: [10.1002/nla.2486](https://doi.org/10.1002/nla.2486), arXiv: [2202.09069](https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.09069). Code: [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7249209)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7249209).
59
+
60
+ * M. A. Olshanskii, A. Quaini and Q. Sun. “A finite element method for two-phase flow with material viscous interface”. *Comput. Methods Appl. Math.* 22(2), 443–464, 2022. doi: [10.1515/cmam-2021-0185](https://doi.org/10.1515/cmam-2021-0185), arXiv: [2106.02922](https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02922).
61
+
62
+ * M. A. Olshanskii, A. Quaini and Q. Sun. “An unfitted finite element method for two-phase Stokes problems with slip between phases”. *J. Sci. Comput.* 89(2), 41, 2021. doi: [10.1007/s10915-021-01658-x](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-021-01658-x), arXiv: [2101.09627](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.09627).
63
+
64
+ * T. Ludescher. “Multilevel preconditioning of stabilized unfitted finite element discretizations”. *PhD thesis* RWTH Aachen University, 2020. doi: [10.18154/RWTH-2020-07305](https://doi.org/10.18154/RWTH-2020-07305).
65
+
66
+ * C. Lehrenfeld and A. Reusken. “L2-error analysis of an isoparametric unfitted finite element method for elliptic interface problems”. *J. Numer. Math.* 27(2), 85–99, 2019. doi: [10.1515/jnma-2017-0109](https://doi.org/10.1515/jnma-2017-0109).
67
+
68
+ * C. Lehrenfeld and A. Reusken. “Analysis of a high-order unfitted finite element method for elliptic interface problems”. *IMA J. Numer. Anal.* 38(3), 1351–1387, 2018. doi: [10.1093/imanum/drx041](https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/drx041), arXiv: [1602.02970](https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.02970).
69
+
70
+ * C. Lehrenfeld and A. Reusken. “Optimal preconditioners for Nitsche-XFEM discretizations of interface problems”. *Numer. Math.* 135(2), 313–332, 2017. doi: [10.1007/s00211-016-0801-6](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-016-0801-6), arXiv: [1408.2940](https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.2940).
71
+
72
+ * P. L. Lederer, C.-M. Pfeiler, C. Wintersteiger and C. Lehrenfeld. “Higher order unfitted FEM for Stokes interface problems”. *Proc. Appl. Math. Mech.* 16(1), 7–10, 2016. doi: [10.1002/pamm.201610003](https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.201610003).
73
+
74
+ * C. Lehrenfeld. “High order unfitted finite element methods on level set domains using isoparametric mappings”. *Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.* 300, 716–733, 2016. doi: [10.1016/j.cma.2015.12.005](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.12.005).
75
+
76
+ * C. Lehrenfeld. “Removing the stabilization parameter in fitted and unfitted symmetric Nitsche formulations”. *Proceedings of the VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (ECCOMAS Congress 2016)* 2016. doi: [10.7712/100016.1820.4573](https://doi.org/10.7712/100016.1820.4573), arXiv: [1603.00617](https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.00617).
77
+
78
+ ### Moving domains: space-time methods
79
+
80
+ Unfitted space-time finite element methods for PDEs on moving domains.
81
+
82
+ * E. Burman and F. Heimann. “Higher order unfitted space-time methods for transport problems”. preprint, 2025. arXiv: [2509.02253](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02253). Code: [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17185244)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17185244).
83
+
84
+ * F. Heimann and C. Lehrenfeld. “A higher order unfitted space-time finite element method for coupled surface-bulk problems”. *Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications ENUMATH 2023* Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Springer, 2025. doi: [10.1007/978-3-031-86173-4_43](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-86173-4_43), arXiv: [2401.07807](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07807). Code: [GitLab](https://gitlab.gwdg.de/fabian.heimann/repro-ho-unf-space-time-coupled).
85
+
86
+ * F. Heimann, C. Lehrenfeld and J. Preuß. “Discretization error analysis of a high-order unfitted space-time method for moving domain problems”. *IMA J. Numer. Anal.* 2025. doi: [10.1093/imanum/draf084](https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/draf084), arXiv: [2504.08608](https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08608). (advance article)
87
+
88
+ * F. Heimann and C. Lehrenfeld. “Geometry error analysis of a parametric mapping for higher order unfitted space-time methods”. *IMA J. Numer. Anal.* 45(6), 3643–3697, 2025. doi: [10.1093/imanum/drae098](https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/drae098), arXiv: [2311.02348](https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02348). Code: [GitLab](https://gitlab.gwdg.de/fabian.heimann/repro-ho-unf-space-time-fem-geom).
89
+
90
+ * F. Heimann. “Higher order unfitted space-time finite element methods for moving domain problems”. *PhD thesis* Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 2025. doi: [10.53846/goediss-11003](https://doi.org/10.53846/goediss-11003).
91
+
92
+ * A. Reusken and H. Sass. “Analysis of a space-time unfitted finite element method for PDEs on evolving surfaces”. preprint, 2024. arXiv: [2401.01215](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01215).
93
+
94
+ * F. Heimann, C. Lehrenfeld and J. Preuß. “Geometrically higher order unfitted space-time methods for PDEs on moving domains”. *SIAM J. Sci. Comput.* 45(2), B139–B165, 2023. doi: [10.1137/22M1476034](https://doi.org/10.1137/22M1476034), arXiv: [2202.02216](https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02216). Code: [GitLab](https://gitlab.gwdg.de/fabian.heimann/repro-ho-unf-space-time-fem).
95
+
96
+ * H. Sass. “Space-time trace finite element methods for partial differential equations on evolving surfaces”. *PhD thesis* RWTH Aachen University, 2022. doi: [10.18154/RWTH-2022-09895](https://doi.org/10.18154/RWTH-2022-09895).
97
+
98
+ * A. C. Wendler. “Monolithic unfitted space-time FEM for an osmotic cell swelling problem”. *Master's thesis* Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 2022. doi: [10.25625/0KPEON](https://doi.org/10.25625/0KPEON).
99
+
100
+ * F. Heimann. “On discontinuous- and continuous-in-time unfitted space-time methods for PDEs on moving domains”. *Master's thesis* Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 2020. doi: [10.25625/CDCMYT](https://doi.org/10.25625/CDCMYT).
101
+
102
+ * J. Preuß. “Higher order unfitted isoparametric space-time FEM on moving domains”. *Master's thesis* Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 2018. doi: [10.25625/UACWXS](https://doi.org/10.25625/UACWXS).
103
+
104
+ ### Moving domains: Eulerian time-stepping
105
+
106
+ Unfitted finite element methods on moving domains with time-stepping on a fixed background mesh (ghost-penalty extension, BDF schemes, narrow band methods).
107
+
108
+ * M. A. Olshanskii and H. von Wahl. “A conservative Eulerian finite element method for transport and diffusion in moving domains”. *Comput. Methods Appl. Math.* 25(4), 961–979, 2025. doi: [10.1515/cmam-2024-0055](https://doi.org/10.1515/cmam-2024-0055), arXiv: [2404.07130](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07130). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/hvonwah/conserv-eulerian-moving-domian-repro), [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10951768)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10951768).
109
+
110
+ * M. A. Olshanskii, A. Reusken and P. Schwering. “A narrow band finite element method for the level set equation”. *SIAM J. Sci. Comput.* 47(2), 2025. doi: [10.1137/24M1674182](https://doi.org/10.1137/24M1674182), arXiv: [2407.02950](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02950).
111
+
112
+ * M. A. Olshanskii and H. von Wahl. “Stability of instantaneous pressures in an Eulerian finite element method for moving boundary flow problems”. *J. Comput. Phys.* 2025. arXiv: [2412.17657](https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17657). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/hvonwah/stable_inst_pressure_moving_domain_repro), [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14548166)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14548166).
113
+
114
+ * M. Neilan and M. A. Olshanskii. “An Eulerian finite element method for the linearized Navier–Stokes problem in an evolving domain”. *IMA J. Numer. Anal.* 44(6), 3234–3258, 2024. doi: [10.1093/imanum/drad105](https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/drad105), arXiv: [2308.01444](https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01444).
115
+
116
+ * H. von Wahl and T. Richter. “An Eulerian time-stepping scheme for a coupled parabolic moving domain problem using equal order unfitted finite elements”. *Proc. Appl. Math. Mech.* 22(1), e202200003, 2023. doi: [10.1002/pamm.202200003](https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.202200003).
117
+
118
+ * H. von Wahl and T. Richter. “Error analysis for a parabolic PDE model problem on a coupled moving domain in a fully Eulerian framework”. *SIAM J. Numer. Anal.* 61(1), 286–314, 2023. doi: [10.1137/21M1458417](https://doi.org/10.1137/21M1458417), arXiv: [2111.05607](https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.05607). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/hvonwah/repro-eulerian-coupled-heat), [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6505243)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6505243).
119
+
120
+ * Y. Lou and C. Lehrenfeld. “Isoparametric unfitted BDF–finite element method for PDEs on evolving domains”. *SIAM J. Numer. Anal.* 60(4), 2069–2098, 2022. doi: [10.1137/21M142126X](https://doi.org/10.1137/21M142126X), arXiv: [2105.09162](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.09162). Code: [GitLab](https://gitlab.gwdg.de/lehrenfeld/repro-isop-unf-bdf-fem).
121
+
122
+ * H. von Wahl, T. Richter and C. Lehrenfeld. “An unfitted Eulerian finite element method for the time-dependent Stokes problem on moving domains”. *IMA J. Numer. Anal.* 42(3), 2505–2544, 2022. doi: [10.1093/imanum/drab044](https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/drab044), arXiv: [2002.02352](https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02352). Code: [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3647571)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3647571).
123
+
124
+ * C. Lehrenfeld and M. A. Olshanskii. “An Eulerian finite element method for PDEs in time-dependent domains”. *ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal.* 53(2), 585–614, 2019. doi: [10.1051/m2an/2018068](https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2018068).
125
+
126
+ ### Fluid-structure interaction, contact and fracture
127
+
128
+ Fully Eulerian unfitted methods for fluid-rigid body and fluid-structure interaction, including contact and phase-field fracture.
129
+
130
+ * S. Lee, H. von Wahl and T. Wick. “A thermo-flow-mechanics-fracture model coupling a phase-field interface approach and thermo-fluid-structure interaction”. *Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.* 2025. doi: [10.1002/nme.7646](https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.7646), arXiv: [2409.03416](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03416). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/hvonwah/repro-tfsi-pff), [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13685486)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13685486).
131
+
132
+ * H. von Wahl and T. Wick. “A coupled high-accuracy phase-field fluid-structure interaction framework for Stokes fluid-filled fracture surrounded by an elastic medium”. *Results Appl. Math.* 22, 100455, 2024. doi: [10.1016/j.rinam.2024.100455](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinam.2024.100455), arXiv: [2308.15400](https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15400). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/hvonwah/repro-coupled-phase-field-fsi), [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10362611)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10362611).
133
+
134
+ * H. von Wahl and T. Wick. “A high-accuracy framework for phase-field fracture interface reconstructions with application to Stokes fluid-filled fracture surrounded by an elastic medium”. *Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.* 415, 116202, 2023. doi: [10.1016/j.cma.2023.116202](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116202), arXiv: [2212.07982](https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.07982). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/hvonwah/stationary_phase_field_stokes_fsi), [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7443025)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7443025).
135
+
136
+ * M. Kemper. “Pure Eulerian unfitted FEM for biological fluid-structure interaction problems”. *Master's thesis* Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 2022. doi: [10.25625/DYUGCA](https://doi.org/10.25625/DYUGCA).
137
+
138
+ * H. von Wahl, T. Richter, S. Frei and T. Hagemeier. “Falling balls in a viscous fluid with contact: Comparing numerical simulations with experimental data”. *Phys. Fluids* 33(3), 033304, 2021. doi: [10.1063/5.0037971](https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0037971), arXiv: [2011.08691](https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.08691). Code: [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3989604)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3989604).
139
+
140
+ * H. von Wahl. “Unfitted finite elements for fluid-rigid body interaction problems”. *PhD thesis* Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, 2021. doi: [10.25673/40013](https://doi.org/10.25673/40013).
141
+
142
+ * H. von Wahl and T. Richter. “Using a deep neural network to predict the motion of under-resolved triangular rigid bodies in an incompressible flow”. *Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids* 93(12), 2021. doi: [10.1002/fld.5037](https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.5037), arXiv: [2102.11636](https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.11636).
143
+
144
+ ### PDEs on surfaces (TraceFEM)
145
+
146
+ Trace finite element methods for scalar and vector-valued PDEs on stationary and evolving surfaces.
147
+
148
+ * T. Alemán and A. Reusken. “Numerical analysis of a constrained strain energy minimization problem”. *SIAM J. Sci. Comput.* 48(3), A1564–A1586, 2026. doi: [10.1137/24M1713545](https://doi.org/10.1137/24M1713545), arXiv: [2411.19089](https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19089).
149
+
150
+ * L. Bouck, R. H. Nochetto, M. Shakipov and V. Yushutin. “Inf-sup stability of parabolic TraceFEM”. *Found. Comput. Math.* 2026. doi: [10.1007/s10208-026-09757-7](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10208-026-09757-7), arXiv: [2409.13944](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13944).
151
+
152
+ * M. Neilan and H. Wan. “A TraceFEM C0 interior penalty method for the surface biharmonic equation”. *J. Sci. Comput.* 108(3), 66, 2026. doi: [10.1007/s10915-026-03384-8](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-026-03384-8), arXiv: [2512.18949](https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.18949).
153
+
154
+ * F. Heimann and C. Lehrenfeld. “A higher order unfitted space-time finite element method for coupled surface-bulk problems”. *Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications ENUMATH 2023* Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Springer, 2025. doi: [10.1007/978-3-031-86173-4_43](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-86173-4_43), arXiv: [2401.07807](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07807). Code: [GitLab](https://gitlab.gwdg.de/fabian.heimann/repro-ho-unf-space-time-coupled).
155
+
156
+ * P. Schwering. “Surface Navier–Stokes equations: numerical methods and analysis”. *PhD thesis* RWTH Aachen University, 2025. Code: [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17120084)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17120084).
157
+
158
+ * E. Bachini, P. Brandner, T. Jankuhn, M. Nestler, S. Praetorius, A. Reusken and A. Voigt. “Diffusion of tangential tensor fields: numerical issues and influence of geometric properties”. *J. Numer. Math.* 32(1), 55–75, 2024. doi: [10.1515/jnma-2022-0088](https://doi.org/10.1515/jnma-2022-0088), arXiv: [2205.12581](https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12581). Code: [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7096487)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7096487).
159
+
160
+ * M. A. Olshanskii, A. Reusken and P. Schwering. “An Eulerian finite element method for tangential Navier–Stokes equations on evolving surfaces”. *Math. Comp.* 93, 2031–2065, 2024. arXiv: [2302.00779](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00779).
161
+
162
+ * A. Reusken and H. Sass. “Analysis of a space-time unfitted finite element method for PDEs on evolving surfaces”. preprint, 2024. arXiv: [2401.01215](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01215).
163
+
164
+ * S. Lu and X. Xu. “Numerical investigations on trace finite element methods for the Laplace–Beltrami eigenvalue problem”. *J. Sci. Comput.* 97(1), 12, 2023. doi: [10.1007/s10915-023-02326-y](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-023-02326-y), arXiv: [2108.02434](https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.02434). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/lusongno1/surface_PDEs).
165
+
166
+ * H. Sass and A. Reusken. “An accurate and robust Eulerian finite element method for partial differential equations on evolving surfaces”. *Comput. Math. Appl.* 146, 253–270, 2023. arXiv: [2212.12030](https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.12030).
167
+
168
+ * E. Schlesinger. “Embedded Trefftz trace DG methods for PDEs on unfitted surfaces”. *Master's thesis* Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 2023. doi: [10.25625/QTOPWD](https://doi.org/10.25625/QTOPWD). Code: [GRO.data (doi: 10.25625/L6J3DM)](https://doi.org/10.25625/L6J3DM).
169
+
170
+ * P. Brandner, T. Jankuhn, S. Praetorius, A. Reusken and A. Voigt. “Finite element discretization methods for velocity-pressure and stream function formulations of surface Stokes equations”. *SIAM J. Sci. Comput.* 44(4), A1807–A1832, 2022. doi: [10.1137/21M1403126](https://doi.org/10.1137/21M1403126), arXiv: [2103.03843](https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03843).
171
+
172
+ * P. Brandner. “Numerical methods for surface Navier–Stokes equations in stream function formulation”. *PhD thesis* RWTH Aachen University, 2022. doi: [10.18154/RWTH-2022-04531](https://doi.org/10.18154/RWTH-2022-04531).
173
+
174
+ * A. Reusken. “Analysis of finite element methods for surface vector-Laplace eigenproblems”. *Math. Comp.* 91, 1587–1623, 2022. doi: [10.1090/mcom/3728](https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/3728), arXiv: [2011.02851](https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.02851).
175
+
176
+ * H. Sass. “Space-time trace finite element methods for partial differential equations on evolving surfaces”. *PhD thesis* RWTH Aachen University, 2022. doi: [10.18154/RWTH-2022-09895](https://doi.org/10.18154/RWTH-2022-09895).
177
+
178
+ * T. Jankuhn and A. Reusken. “Trace finite element methods for surface vector-Laplace equations”. *IMA J. Numer. Anal.* 41(1), 48–83, 2021. doi: [10.1093/imanum/drz062](https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/drz062), arXiv: [1904.12494](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12494).
179
+
180
+ * P. Brandner and A. Reusken. “Finite element error analysis of surface Stokes equations in stream function formulation”. *ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal.* 54(6), 2069–2097, 2020. doi: [10.1051/m2an/2020044](https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2020044).
181
+
182
+ * T. Jankuhn and A. Reusken. “Higher order trace finite element methods for the surface Stokes equation”. preprint, 2019. arXiv: [1909.08327](https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.08327).
183
+
184
+ * J. Grande, C. Lehrenfeld and A. Reusken. “Analysis of a high-order trace finite element method for PDEs on level set surfaces”. *SIAM J. Numer. Anal.* 56(1), 228–255, 2018. doi: [10.1137/16M1102203](https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1102203).
185
+
186
+ * F. Heimann. “Higher order discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Laplace-Beltrami problem on unfitted smooth surfaces”. *Bachelor's thesis* Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 2018. doi: [10.25625/OIBRT4](https://doi.org/10.25625/OIBRT4).
187
+
188
+ ### Optimization, inverse problems and model order reduction
189
+
190
+ Shape optimization, PDE-constrained optimal control, unique continuation / data assimilation and reduced order modelling with unfitted discretizations.
191
+
192
+ * E. Burman, J. Preuß and T. van Beeck. “Variational data assimilation for the wave equation in heterogeneous media: numerical investigation of stability”. *Commun. Appl. Math. Comput.* 2026. doi: [10.1007/s42967-026-00583-w](https://doi.org/10.1007/s42967-026-00583-w), arXiv: [2509.13108](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13108). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/TimvanBeeck/waveUC_discCoefs).
193
+
194
+ * E. Burman and J. Preuß. “Unique continuation for an elliptic interface problem using unfitted isoparametric finite elements”. *SMAI J. Comput. Math.* 2025. doi: [10.5802/smai-jcm.122](https://doi.org/10.5802/smai-jcm.122), arXiv: [2307.05210](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05210). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/UCL/interface-uc-unfitted-iso), [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13328144)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13328144).
195
+
196
+ * E. Burman, L. Oksanen, J. Preuß and Z. Zhao. “Unique continuation for the wave equation: the stability landscape”. preprint, 2025. Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/janoschpreuss/wave-uc-stability-landscape-repro), [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17370507)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17370507).
197
+
198
+ * W. Gong and Z. Zhang. “A novel shape optimization approach for source identification in elliptic equations”. *Inverse Probl. Imaging* 2025. doi: [10.3934/ipi.2025037](https://doi.org/10.3934/ipi.2025037), arXiv: [2407.02909](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02909).
199
+
200
+ * G. Katsouleas, E. N. Karatzas and F. Travlopanos. “Discrete empirical interpolation and unfitted mesh FEMs: application in PDE-constrained optimization”. *Optimization* 72(6), 1609–1642, 2023. doi: [10.1080/02331934.2022.2032697](https://doi.org/10.1080/02331934.2022.2032697), arXiv: [2010.09059](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.09059).
201
+
202
+ * A. Aretaki and E. N. Karatzas. “Random geometries for optimal control PDE problems based on fictitious domain FEMs and cut elements”. *J. Comput. Appl. Math.* 412, 114286, 2022. doi: [10.1016/j.cam.2022.114286](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2022.114286), arXiv: [2003.00352](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00352).
203
+
204
+ * E. N. Karatzas, M. Nonino, F. Ballarin and G. Rozza. “A reduced order cut finite element method for geometrically parametrized steady and unsteady Navier–Stokes problems”. *Comput. Math. Appl.* 116, 140–160, 2022. doi: [10.1016/j.camwa.2021.07.016](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2021.07.016), arXiv: [2010.04953](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.04953).
205
+
206
+ * E. N. Karatzas and G. Rozza. “A reduced order model for a stable embedded boundary parametrized Cahn–Hilliard phase-field system based on cut finite elements”. *J. Sci. Comput.* 89, 9, 2021. doi: [10.1007/s10915-021-01623-8](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-021-01623-8), arXiv: [2009.01596](https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01596).
207
+
208
+ * E. N. Karatzas, F. Ballarin and G. Rozza. “Projection-based reduced order models for a cut finite element method in parametrized domains”. *Comput. Math. Appl.* 79(3), 833–851, 2020. doi: [10.1016/j.camwa.2019.08.003](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2019.08.003), arXiv: [1901.03846](https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.03846).
209
+
210
+ * H.-G. Raumer. “Shape optimization for interface problems using unfitted finite elements”. *Master's thesis* Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 2018. url: <http://cpde.math.uni-goettingen.de/data/Rau18_Ma.pdf>.
211
+
212
+ ### Further applications and benchmarks
213
+
214
+ Works in which ngsxfem is used for other applications, for fitted space-time discretizations or as one of several benchmarked codes.
215
+
216
+ * M. Loibl, G. H. Teixeira, T. Toprak, I. Shishkina, C. Miao, J. Kiendl, F. Kummer and B. Marussig. “Comparative study of different quadrature methods for cut elements”. *Arch. Comput. Methods Eng.* 2026. doi: [10.1007/s11831-026-10619-2](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-026-10619-2). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/B2-M/CutElementIntegration), [Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14961680)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14961680). (ngsxfem is one of the benchmarked cut-element quadrature codes)
217
+
218
+ * T. Toprak, M. Loibl, G. H. Teixeira, I. Shishkina, C. Miao, J. Kiendl, B. Marussig and F. Kummer. “Employing continuous integration inspired workflows for benchmarking of scientific software – a use case on numerical cut element quadrature”. *Adv. Eng. Softw.* 213, 104087, 2026. doi: [10.1016/j.advengsoft.2025.104087](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2025.104087), arXiv: [2503.17192](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17192). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/B2-M/CutElementIntegration). (ngsxfem is one of the benchmarked cut-element quadrature codes)
219
+
220
+ * G. Fu and Y. Yang. “A hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method on unfitted meshes for single-phase Darcy flow in fractured porous media”. *Adv. Water Resour.* 173, 104390, 2023. doi: [10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104390](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104390), arXiv: [2209.05445](https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.05445). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/gridfunction/fracturedPorousMedia).
221
+
222
+ * J. Smith-Roberge. “Microcolony dynamics: motion from growth, order, and incompressibility”. *PhD thesis* University of Waterloo, 2023. hdl: [10012/19340](https://hdl.handle.net/10012/19340).
223
+
224
+ * G. Fu and Z. Xu. “High-order space-time finite element methods for the Poisson–Nernst–Planck equations: positivity and unconditional energy stability”. *Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.* 395, 115031, 2022. doi: [10.1016/j.cma.2022.115031](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115031), arXiv: [2105.01163](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01163). (fitted space-time discretization using the space-time tools of ngsxfem)
225
+
226
+ ### Software building on ngsxfem
227
+
228
+ Libraries and solver collections that build on top of ngsxfem.
229
+
230
+ * ngsxfem developers. “ngsxditto: a high-level Python library for PDEs on moving domains and two-phase flows built on NGSolve and ngsxfem”. software, 2025. Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/ngsxfem/ngsxditto), [Documentation](https://ngsxfem.github.io/ngsxditto/).
231
+
232
+ * M. Shakipov. “surf-pde: a collection of TraceFEM solvers for surface PDEs implemented with ngsxfem”. software, 2023. Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/chromomons/surf-pde).
233
+
234
+ * P. Stocker. “NGSTrefftz: Add-on to NGSolve for Trefftz methods”. *Journal of Open Source Software* 7(71), 4135, 2022. doi: [10.21105/joss.04135](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04135). Code: [GitHub](https://github.com/PaulSt/NGSTrefftz). (NGSTrefftz uses ngsxfem for unfitted (embedded) Trefftz methods)