vibeauditor 0.1.0__tar.gz

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
1
+ Apache License
2
+ Version 2.0, January 2004
3
+ http://www.apache.org/licenses/
4
+
5
+ Copyright 2026 vibeAuditor Contributors
6
+
7
+ Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
8
+ you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
9
+ You may obtain a copy of the License at
10
+
11
+ http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
12
+
13
+ Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
14
+ distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
15
+ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
16
+ See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
17
+ limitations under the License.
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
1
+ Metadata-Version: 2.4
2
+ Name: vibeauditor
3
+ Version: 0.1.0
4
+ Summary: Audit AI-built apps before they ship.
5
+ Author: vibeAuditor Contributors
6
+ License-Expression: Apache-2.0
7
+ Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/whitechart-studio/VibeAuditor-
8
+ Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/whitechart-studio/VibeAuditor-
9
+ Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/whitechart-studio/VibeAuditor-/issues
10
+ Keywords: security,audit,ai,vibe-coding,sast,supabase,llm
11
+ Classifier: Development Status :: 3 - Alpha
12
+ Classifier: Environment :: Console
13
+ Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
14
+ Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
15
+ Classifier: Topic :: Security
16
+ Classifier: Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance
17
+ Requires-Python: >=3.10
18
+ Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
19
+ License-File: LICENSE
20
+ Dynamic: license-file
21
+
22
+ # vibeAuditor
23
+
24
+ Audit AI-built apps before they ship.
25
+
26
+ vibeAuditor is a local-first security and quality audit CLI for vibe-coded and
27
+ AI-assisted software. It blends trusted open-source scanners with AI-app-specific
28
+ checks for secrets, auth gaps, Supabase mistakes, webhook risks, unsafe execution,
29
+ and prompt-injection surfaces.
30
+
31
+ The goal is simple: one command, one professional report.
32
+
33
+ ## Why vibeAuditor
34
+
35
+ AI coding tools are fast, but they do not reliably prove that an app is safe to
36
+ ship. vibeAuditor gives builders a practical pre-ship gate: built-in checks for
37
+ the mistakes common in AI-built apps, plus a clean path to proven open-source
38
+ scanners such as Trivy, Semgrep, OSV-Scanner, Gitleaks, Syft, Grype, and ZAP.
39
+
40
+ ## What it checks
41
+
42
+ - Exposed secrets and high-risk environment files.
43
+ - Supabase service-role key leaks and client/server boundary mistakes.
44
+ - Missing or suspicious auth guards around API routes.
45
+ - Stripe webhook handlers without signature verification.
46
+ - LLM prompt injection patterns, unsafe tool calls, and model output passed to code execution.
47
+ - Risky dependency manifests and lockfile presence.
48
+ - Optional external scanner availability: Trivy, Semgrep, OSV-Scanner, Gitleaks, Syft, Grype, and ZAP.
49
+
50
+ ## Quick Start
51
+
52
+ Install from a local checkout:
53
+
54
+ ```bash
55
+ pipx install .
56
+ ```
57
+
58
+ Or during active development:
59
+
60
+ ```bash
61
+ pipx install --editable .
62
+ ```
63
+
64
+ ```bash
65
+ vibeauditor /path/to/project
66
+ ```
67
+
68
+ From this repository during development:
69
+
70
+ ```bash
71
+ PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m vibeauditor .
72
+ ```
73
+
74
+ Write JSON for CI or AI agents:
75
+
76
+ ```bash
77
+ vibeauditor . --json report.json
78
+ ```
79
+
80
+ Write a bucketed Markdown report for GitHub issues, PR comments, or product review:
81
+
82
+ ```bash
83
+ vibeauditor . --markdown vibeauditor-report.md
84
+ ```
85
+
86
+ Write a GitHub issue-friendly report with detailed finding sections instead of
87
+ wide tables:
88
+
89
+ ```bash
90
+ vibeauditor . --github-markdown vibeauditor-github.md
91
+ ```
92
+
93
+ Fail CI when high or critical findings exist:
94
+
95
+ ```bash
96
+ vibeauditor . --fail-on high
97
+ ```
98
+
99
+ Use a project profile:
100
+
101
+ ```bash
102
+ vibeauditor . --profile next-supabase
103
+ ```
104
+
105
+ GitHub Actions template:
106
+
107
+ ```text
108
+ examples/github-actions/vibeauditor.yml
109
+ ```
110
+
111
+ Copy it into `.github/workflows/vibeauditor.yml` in a repository where you want
112
+ vibeAuditor to run on pull requests.
113
+
114
+ ## Optional Scanner Integrations
115
+
116
+ vibeAuditor does not install scanners for you. If these commands exist on your
117
+ machine, it can run them and include a short summary:
118
+
119
+ ```bash
120
+ trivy fs .
121
+ semgrep scan --config auto .
122
+ osv-scanner scan source .
123
+ gitleaks detect --source .
124
+ ```
125
+
126
+ Use:
127
+
128
+ ```bash
129
+ vibeauditor . --external
130
+ ```
131
+
132
+ ## Example Output
133
+
134
+ vibeAuditor leads with a product decision, not a raw vulnerability dump:
135
+
136
+ ```text
137
+ vibeAuditor Report
138
+ ==================
139
+
140
+ Profile: next-supabase - Next.js and Supabase pre-ship checks.
141
+ Focus: supabase, auth, secrets, dependencies
142
+
143
+ Findings: 9 (critical 3, high 1, medium 5, low 0)
144
+ Verdict: BLOCKED - fix blocker findings before production
145
+ Primary reason: Credentials detected in env, source, or build output
146
+ Product risk: Blocker 3, High 1, Medium 3, Low 2
147
+
148
+ Top Actions
149
+ -----------
150
+ 1. Rotate exposed credentials, remove real keys from env/build artifacts, and rerun gitleaks plus vibeAuditor.
151
+ 2. Verify every write path derives identity from the server/session and blocks cross-user access with tests.
152
+ 3. Prove RLS-sensitive tables deny direct anon/authenticated access or document SECURITY DEFINER-only access.
153
+
154
+ Risk Buckets
155
+ ------------
156
+ | Domain | Risk | Findings | Status |
157
+ | --------------------- | ------- | -------- | --------------------- |
158
+ | Secrets & Credentials | Blocker | 4 | Needs fix before ship |
159
+ | Auth & Access Control | High | 1 | Needs owner review |
160
+ | Data Privacy & RLS | Medium | 2 | Needs verification |
161
+ | Developer Tooling | Low | 2 | Optional hardening |
162
+ ```
163
+
164
+ Detailed sections include asset context, confidence, product impact, AI fix
165
+ prompt, verification steps, and safely redacted evidence:
166
+
167
+ ```text
168
+ Secrets & Credentials
169
+ ---------------------
170
+ | Risk | Conf | Asset | Location | Issue |
171
+ | ------- | --------- | -------------- | ---------------------------- | ---------------------------------- |
172
+ | Blocker | confirmed | local_env | .env:2 | Possible Supabase JWT-like key... |
173
+ | Blocker | confirmed | build_artifact | dist-ssr/entry-server.js:126 | Possible Supabase JWT-like key... |
174
+
175
+ AI fix prompt:
176
+ You are fixing credential exposure in this project. A Supabase JWT-like key was
177
+ found in build_artifact. Do not remove required runtime env usage. Ensure
178
+ browser/client code only receives public anon keys, never service-role or
179
+ private keys. Remove real values from env/build artifacts, update .env.example
180
+ with placeholders, verify .gitignore excludes local env and generated build
181
+ output, rotate any exposed credential, then rerun vibeAuditor and gitleaks.
182
+
183
+ Verification:
184
+ git ls-files .env .env.local dist-ssr/entry-server.js
185
+ gitleaks detect --source .
186
+ vibeauditor . --profile next-supabase
187
+ ```
188
+
189
+ With `--external`, scanner coverage is summarized in the same report:
190
+
191
+ ```text
192
+ Tooling Coverage
193
+ ----------------
194
+ - Trivy: secrets found in .env and build output
195
+ - Semgrep: shell/spawn usage in developer scripts
196
+ - OSV-Scanner: no dependency issues found
197
+ - Gitleaks: leak detected in git history
198
+ - Syft: package inventory generated
199
+ - Grype: no vulnerabilities found
200
+ ```
201
+
202
+ For GitHub issues, use the sectioned format:
203
+
204
+ ```bash
205
+ vibeauditor . --profile next-supabase --github-markdown vibeauditor-github.md
206
+ ```
207
+
208
+ It produces issue-friendly blocks like:
209
+
210
+ ```markdown
211
+ ## Secrets & Credentials
212
+
213
+ **Bucket risk:** Blocker
214
+ **Findings:** 4
215
+
216
+ ### VA002: Possible Supabase JWT-like key exposed
217
+
218
+ - **Risk:** Blocker
219
+ - **Confidence:** confirmed
220
+ - **Asset context:** `build_artifact`
221
+ - **Location:** `dist-ssr/entry-server.js:126`
222
+ - **Fingerprint:** `0259095bde85a569`
223
+
224
+ **Product impact**
225
+
226
+ A Supabase JWT-like credential appears in build_artifact. If this is a
227
+ service-role key, it can bypass RLS and expose marketplace user, worker,
228
+ contractor, OTP, or payment data.
229
+ ```
230
+
231
+ ## Scanner Blend
232
+
233
+ vibeAuditor is designed as an orchestration layer, not a replacement for mature
234
+ security tools.
235
+
236
+ | Layer | Tool | Purpose |
237
+ | --- | --- | --- |
238
+ | Vibe rules | Built in | AI-app mistakes, Supabase/auth/webhook/LLM checks |
239
+ | SAST | Semgrep | insecure source patterns |
240
+ | Code intelligence | CodeQL | deeper semantic analysis for GitHub/open-source repos |
241
+ | Dependencies | OSV-Scanner | open-source package vulnerabilities |
242
+ | Repo/container/IaC | Trivy | vulnerabilities, secrets, misconfig, SBOM, licenses |
243
+ | Secrets | Gitleaks | high-signal secret detection |
244
+ | SBOM | Syft | software bill of materials |
245
+ | SBOM vulnerabilities | Grype | vulnerability scan from filesystem/SBOM |
246
+ | Live app | ZAP | dynamic web app security testing |
247
+
248
+ ## Report Model
249
+
250
+ vibeAuditor groups findings into product-risk domains instead of dumping a flat
251
+ scanner list:
252
+
253
+ - Secrets & Credentials
254
+ - Auth & Access Control
255
+ - Data Privacy & RLS
256
+ - Payments & Webhooks
257
+ - AI / LLM Safety
258
+ - Supply Chain
259
+ - Infrastructure & Deployment
260
+ - General Code Quality
261
+
262
+ Each finding includes:
263
+
264
+ - severity
265
+ - product risk: `Blocker`, `High`, `Medium`, `Low`
266
+ - confidence: `confirmed`, `likely`, `needs_review`
267
+ - asset context: `tracked_source`, `local_env`, `build_artifact`, `developer_script`, `database_migration`, etc.
268
+ - domain bucket
269
+ - stable fingerprint
270
+ - product impact
271
+ - AI fix prompt
272
+ - verification step
273
+
274
+ This structure is designed for the next GitHub workflow:
275
+
276
+ ```text
277
+ scan project -> bucket findings -> create/update GitHub issues -> close fixed buckets
278
+ ```
279
+
280
+ ## Suppressions
281
+
282
+ Known accepted-risk findings can be suppressed with `.vibeauditor.toml`.
283
+ Suppressions use stable fingerprints from the JSON or GitHub Markdown report.
284
+
285
+ ```toml
286
+ [[suppress]]
287
+ fingerprint = "abc123def4567890"
288
+ reason = "Local developer script only spawns a static Semgrep command."
289
+ expires = "2026-07-01"
290
+ ```
291
+
292
+ Suppressions should always include a reason and an expiry date so risk does not
293
+ silently disappear forever.
294
+
295
+ ## Planned Rule Packs
296
+
297
+ - `next-supabase`: service-role exposure, RLS gaps, API auth, public env safety.
298
+ - `stripe-saas`: webhook signatures, payment state transitions, secret handling.
299
+ - `ai-agent`: prompt injection, unsafe tools, model output execution, data leaks.
300
+ - `mcp-server`: tool auth, filesystem/network boundaries, prompt/tool injection.
301
+ - `browser-extension`: manifest permissions, content-script leakage, token exposure.
302
+
303
+ Current profile names:
304
+
305
+ ```text
306
+ default
307
+ next-supabase
308
+ ai-agent
309
+ stripe-saas
310
+ mcp-server
311
+ ```
312
+
313
+ ## Philosophy
314
+
315
+ This tool is not trying to replace mature scanners. It is a friendly front door:
316
+ fast local checks, plain-English findings, and pointers to the next best tool.
317
+ It is especially tuned for projects built quickly with Cursor, Codex, Claude Code,
318
+ Lovable, Bolt, v0, Replit, and similar workflows.
@@ -0,0 +1,297 @@
1
+ # vibeAuditor
2
+
3
+ Audit AI-built apps before they ship.
4
+
5
+ vibeAuditor is a local-first security and quality audit CLI for vibe-coded and
6
+ AI-assisted software. It blends trusted open-source scanners with AI-app-specific
7
+ checks for secrets, auth gaps, Supabase mistakes, webhook risks, unsafe execution,
8
+ and prompt-injection surfaces.
9
+
10
+ The goal is simple: one command, one professional report.
11
+
12
+ ## Why vibeAuditor
13
+
14
+ AI coding tools are fast, but they do not reliably prove that an app is safe to
15
+ ship. vibeAuditor gives builders a practical pre-ship gate: built-in checks for
16
+ the mistakes common in AI-built apps, plus a clean path to proven open-source
17
+ scanners such as Trivy, Semgrep, OSV-Scanner, Gitleaks, Syft, Grype, and ZAP.
18
+
19
+ ## What it checks
20
+
21
+ - Exposed secrets and high-risk environment files.
22
+ - Supabase service-role key leaks and client/server boundary mistakes.
23
+ - Missing or suspicious auth guards around API routes.
24
+ - Stripe webhook handlers without signature verification.
25
+ - LLM prompt injection patterns, unsafe tool calls, and model output passed to code execution.
26
+ - Risky dependency manifests and lockfile presence.
27
+ - Optional external scanner availability: Trivy, Semgrep, OSV-Scanner, Gitleaks, Syft, Grype, and ZAP.
28
+
29
+ ## Quick Start
30
+
31
+ Install from a local checkout:
32
+
33
+ ```bash
34
+ pipx install .
35
+ ```
36
+
37
+ Or during active development:
38
+
39
+ ```bash
40
+ pipx install --editable .
41
+ ```
42
+
43
+ ```bash
44
+ vibeauditor /path/to/project
45
+ ```
46
+
47
+ From this repository during development:
48
+
49
+ ```bash
50
+ PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m vibeauditor .
51
+ ```
52
+
53
+ Write JSON for CI or AI agents:
54
+
55
+ ```bash
56
+ vibeauditor . --json report.json
57
+ ```
58
+
59
+ Write a bucketed Markdown report for GitHub issues, PR comments, or product review:
60
+
61
+ ```bash
62
+ vibeauditor . --markdown vibeauditor-report.md
63
+ ```
64
+
65
+ Write a GitHub issue-friendly report with detailed finding sections instead of
66
+ wide tables:
67
+
68
+ ```bash
69
+ vibeauditor . --github-markdown vibeauditor-github.md
70
+ ```
71
+
72
+ Fail CI when high or critical findings exist:
73
+
74
+ ```bash
75
+ vibeauditor . --fail-on high
76
+ ```
77
+
78
+ Use a project profile:
79
+
80
+ ```bash
81
+ vibeauditor . --profile next-supabase
82
+ ```
83
+
84
+ GitHub Actions template:
85
+
86
+ ```text
87
+ examples/github-actions/vibeauditor.yml
88
+ ```
89
+
90
+ Copy it into `.github/workflows/vibeauditor.yml` in a repository where you want
91
+ vibeAuditor to run on pull requests.
92
+
93
+ ## Optional Scanner Integrations
94
+
95
+ vibeAuditor does not install scanners for you. If these commands exist on your
96
+ machine, it can run them and include a short summary:
97
+
98
+ ```bash
99
+ trivy fs .
100
+ semgrep scan --config auto .
101
+ osv-scanner scan source .
102
+ gitleaks detect --source .
103
+ ```
104
+
105
+ Use:
106
+
107
+ ```bash
108
+ vibeauditor . --external
109
+ ```
110
+
111
+ ## Example Output
112
+
113
+ vibeAuditor leads with a product decision, not a raw vulnerability dump:
114
+
115
+ ```text
116
+ vibeAuditor Report
117
+ ==================
118
+
119
+ Profile: next-supabase - Next.js and Supabase pre-ship checks.
120
+ Focus: supabase, auth, secrets, dependencies
121
+
122
+ Findings: 9 (critical 3, high 1, medium 5, low 0)
123
+ Verdict: BLOCKED - fix blocker findings before production
124
+ Primary reason: Credentials detected in env, source, or build output
125
+ Product risk: Blocker 3, High 1, Medium 3, Low 2
126
+
127
+ Top Actions
128
+ -----------
129
+ 1. Rotate exposed credentials, remove real keys from env/build artifacts, and rerun gitleaks plus vibeAuditor.
130
+ 2. Verify every write path derives identity from the server/session and blocks cross-user access with tests.
131
+ 3. Prove RLS-sensitive tables deny direct anon/authenticated access or document SECURITY DEFINER-only access.
132
+
133
+ Risk Buckets
134
+ ------------
135
+ | Domain | Risk | Findings | Status |
136
+ | --------------------- | ------- | -------- | --------------------- |
137
+ | Secrets & Credentials | Blocker | 4 | Needs fix before ship |
138
+ | Auth & Access Control | High | 1 | Needs owner review |
139
+ | Data Privacy & RLS | Medium | 2 | Needs verification |
140
+ | Developer Tooling | Low | 2 | Optional hardening |
141
+ ```
142
+
143
+ Detailed sections include asset context, confidence, product impact, AI fix
144
+ prompt, verification steps, and safely redacted evidence:
145
+
146
+ ```text
147
+ Secrets & Credentials
148
+ ---------------------
149
+ | Risk | Conf | Asset | Location | Issue |
150
+ | ------- | --------- | -------------- | ---------------------------- | ---------------------------------- |
151
+ | Blocker | confirmed | local_env | .env:2 | Possible Supabase JWT-like key... |
152
+ | Blocker | confirmed | build_artifact | dist-ssr/entry-server.js:126 | Possible Supabase JWT-like key... |
153
+
154
+ AI fix prompt:
155
+ You are fixing credential exposure in this project. A Supabase JWT-like key was
156
+ found in build_artifact. Do not remove required runtime env usage. Ensure
157
+ browser/client code only receives public anon keys, never service-role or
158
+ private keys. Remove real values from env/build artifacts, update .env.example
159
+ with placeholders, verify .gitignore excludes local env and generated build
160
+ output, rotate any exposed credential, then rerun vibeAuditor and gitleaks.
161
+
162
+ Verification:
163
+ git ls-files .env .env.local dist-ssr/entry-server.js
164
+ gitleaks detect --source .
165
+ vibeauditor . --profile next-supabase
166
+ ```
167
+
168
+ With `--external`, scanner coverage is summarized in the same report:
169
+
170
+ ```text
171
+ Tooling Coverage
172
+ ----------------
173
+ - Trivy: secrets found in .env and build output
174
+ - Semgrep: shell/spawn usage in developer scripts
175
+ - OSV-Scanner: no dependency issues found
176
+ - Gitleaks: leak detected in git history
177
+ - Syft: package inventory generated
178
+ - Grype: no vulnerabilities found
179
+ ```
180
+
181
+ For GitHub issues, use the sectioned format:
182
+
183
+ ```bash
184
+ vibeauditor . --profile next-supabase --github-markdown vibeauditor-github.md
185
+ ```
186
+
187
+ It produces issue-friendly blocks like:
188
+
189
+ ```markdown
190
+ ## Secrets & Credentials
191
+
192
+ **Bucket risk:** Blocker
193
+ **Findings:** 4
194
+
195
+ ### VA002: Possible Supabase JWT-like key exposed
196
+
197
+ - **Risk:** Blocker
198
+ - **Confidence:** confirmed
199
+ - **Asset context:** `build_artifact`
200
+ - **Location:** `dist-ssr/entry-server.js:126`
201
+ - **Fingerprint:** `0259095bde85a569`
202
+
203
+ **Product impact**
204
+
205
+ A Supabase JWT-like credential appears in build_artifact. If this is a
206
+ service-role key, it can bypass RLS and expose marketplace user, worker,
207
+ contractor, OTP, or payment data.
208
+ ```
209
+
210
+ ## Scanner Blend
211
+
212
+ vibeAuditor is designed as an orchestration layer, not a replacement for mature
213
+ security tools.
214
+
215
+ | Layer | Tool | Purpose |
216
+ | --- | --- | --- |
217
+ | Vibe rules | Built in | AI-app mistakes, Supabase/auth/webhook/LLM checks |
218
+ | SAST | Semgrep | insecure source patterns |
219
+ | Code intelligence | CodeQL | deeper semantic analysis for GitHub/open-source repos |
220
+ | Dependencies | OSV-Scanner | open-source package vulnerabilities |
221
+ | Repo/container/IaC | Trivy | vulnerabilities, secrets, misconfig, SBOM, licenses |
222
+ | Secrets | Gitleaks | high-signal secret detection |
223
+ | SBOM | Syft | software bill of materials |
224
+ | SBOM vulnerabilities | Grype | vulnerability scan from filesystem/SBOM |
225
+ | Live app | ZAP | dynamic web app security testing |
226
+
227
+ ## Report Model
228
+
229
+ vibeAuditor groups findings into product-risk domains instead of dumping a flat
230
+ scanner list:
231
+
232
+ - Secrets & Credentials
233
+ - Auth & Access Control
234
+ - Data Privacy & RLS
235
+ - Payments & Webhooks
236
+ - AI / LLM Safety
237
+ - Supply Chain
238
+ - Infrastructure & Deployment
239
+ - General Code Quality
240
+
241
+ Each finding includes:
242
+
243
+ - severity
244
+ - product risk: `Blocker`, `High`, `Medium`, `Low`
245
+ - confidence: `confirmed`, `likely`, `needs_review`
246
+ - asset context: `tracked_source`, `local_env`, `build_artifact`, `developer_script`, `database_migration`, etc.
247
+ - domain bucket
248
+ - stable fingerprint
249
+ - product impact
250
+ - AI fix prompt
251
+ - verification step
252
+
253
+ This structure is designed for the next GitHub workflow:
254
+
255
+ ```text
256
+ scan project -> bucket findings -> create/update GitHub issues -> close fixed buckets
257
+ ```
258
+
259
+ ## Suppressions
260
+
261
+ Known accepted-risk findings can be suppressed with `.vibeauditor.toml`.
262
+ Suppressions use stable fingerprints from the JSON or GitHub Markdown report.
263
+
264
+ ```toml
265
+ [[suppress]]
266
+ fingerprint = "abc123def4567890"
267
+ reason = "Local developer script only spawns a static Semgrep command."
268
+ expires = "2026-07-01"
269
+ ```
270
+
271
+ Suppressions should always include a reason and an expiry date so risk does not
272
+ silently disappear forever.
273
+
274
+ ## Planned Rule Packs
275
+
276
+ - `next-supabase`: service-role exposure, RLS gaps, API auth, public env safety.
277
+ - `stripe-saas`: webhook signatures, payment state transitions, secret handling.
278
+ - `ai-agent`: prompt injection, unsafe tools, model output execution, data leaks.
279
+ - `mcp-server`: tool auth, filesystem/network boundaries, prompt/tool injection.
280
+ - `browser-extension`: manifest permissions, content-script leakage, token exposure.
281
+
282
+ Current profile names:
283
+
284
+ ```text
285
+ default
286
+ next-supabase
287
+ ai-agent
288
+ stripe-saas
289
+ mcp-server
290
+ ```
291
+
292
+ ## Philosophy
293
+
294
+ This tool is not trying to replace mature scanners. It is a friendly front door:
295
+ fast local checks, plain-English findings, and pointers to the next best tool.
296
+ It is especially tuned for projects built quickly with Cursor, Codex, Claude Code,
297
+ Lovable, Bolt, v0, Replit, and similar workflows.
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
1
+ [build-system]
2
+ requires = ["setuptools>=69"]
3
+ build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"
4
+
5
+ [project]
6
+ name = "vibeauditor"
7
+ version = "0.1.0"
8
+ description = "Audit AI-built apps before they ship."
9
+ readme = "README.md"
10
+ requires-python = ">=3.10"
11
+ license = "Apache-2.0"
12
+ authors = [
13
+ { name = "vibeAuditor Contributors" }
14
+ ]
15
+ keywords = ["security", "audit", "ai", "vibe-coding", "sast", "supabase", "llm"]
16
+ classifiers = [
17
+ "Development Status :: 3 - Alpha",
18
+ "Environment :: Console",
19
+ "Intended Audience :: Developers",
20
+ "Programming Language :: Python :: 3",
21
+ "Topic :: Security",
22
+ "Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance",
23
+ ]
24
+
25
+ [project.urls]
26
+ Homepage = "https://github.com/whitechart-studio/VibeAuditor-"
27
+ Repository = "https://github.com/whitechart-studio/VibeAuditor-"
28
+ Issues = "https://github.com/whitechart-studio/VibeAuditor-/issues"
29
+
30
+ [project.scripts]
31
+ vibeauditor = "vibeauditor.cli:main"
32
+ vibe-audit = "vibeauditor.cli:main"
33
+
34
+ [tool.setuptools.packages.find]
35
+ where = ["src"]
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ [egg_info]
2
+ tag_build =
3
+ tag_date = 0
4
+
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
1
+ """Backward-compatible import shim for the old vibe_audit package name."""
2
+
3
+ from vibeauditor import __version__
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ from vibeauditor.cli import main
2
+
3
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
4
+ raise SystemExit(main())
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
1
+ from vibeauditor.cli import main
2
+
3
+ __all__ = ["main"]
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
1
+ """vibeAuditor package."""
2
+
3
+ __version__ = "0.1.0"
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ from .cli import main
2
+
3
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
4
+ raise SystemExit(main())