tunacode-cli 0.0.77.2__tar.gz → 0.0.77.3__tar.gz

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/.claude/debug_history/debug_sessions.json

@@ -1,6 +1,23 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
   "sessions": [
+    {
+      "id": "tool-rejection-feedback-20251010-000001",
+      "time": "2025-10-10T00:00:01",
+      "branch": "master",
+      "base": "current",
+      "head": "current",
+      "changed_files": [
+        "src/tunacode/ui/tool_ui.py",
+        "src/tunacode/core/tool_handler.py",
+        "src/tunacode/types.py",
+        "src/tunacode/cli/repl.py",
+        "tests/characterization/ui/test_tool_confirmations.py",
+        "tests/characterization/repl/test_error_handling.py",
+        "tests/test_plan_mode.py"
+      ],
+      "notes": "Golden test captured existing abort-only option 3, failing test asserted rejection guidance should become a user message. Added instructions field to ToolConfirmationResponse, prompted for feedback in ToolUI, and routed guidance via create_user_message so the agent receives corrective direction."
+    },
     {
       "id": "publish-workflow-cache-bust-20250105-000000",
       "time": "2025-01-05T00:00:00",

tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3/.claude/delta_summaries/2025-10-03-tool_handler-behavior-optimization.md

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+# Tool Handler Behavior Optimization
+
+**Date**: 2025-10-03
+**Component**: `tool_handler` function in `src/tunacode/cli/repl_components/tool_executor.py`
+**Change Type**: Test optimization and behavior clarification
+
+## Summary
+
+Optimized test coverage for `tool_handler` to focus on the specific behavior we rely on: fail-fast cancellation path and handler instantiation. Removed redundant shell commands, REPL loops, and parsing assertions already covered elsewhere.
+
+## Key Behavioral Changes
+
+### 1. Fail-Fast Cancellation Path
+- **Location**: `tool_executor.py:31-34`
+- **Behavior**: Immediate `CancelledError` raise when `state_manager.session.operation_cancelled` is `True`
+- **Test Coverage**: `tests/characterization/repl_components/test_tool_handler.py:22-37`
+- **Key Assertion**: `parse_args` and `ToolHandler` constructors are NOT called when cancelled
+
+### 2. Handler Instantiation Path
+- **Location**: `tool_executor.py:37-41`
+- **Behavior**: Creates new `ToolHandler` only if `state_manager.tool_handler` is `None`
+- **Test Coverage**: `tests/characterization/repl_components/test_tool_handler.py:41-70`
+- **Key Assertions**:
+  - `ToolHandler` called with `state_manager`
+  - `state_manager.set_tool_handler` called with new instance
+  - `parse_args` processes tool arguments
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### Clear Fixtures and Constants
+```python
+TOOL_NAME = "read_file"
+TOOL_ARGS: Dict[str, Any] = {"file_path": "example.py"}
+```
+
+### Semantic Anchor
+- **UUID**: `8f5a4d92` (line 18)
+- **Purpose**: Golden baseline for tool_handler cancellation and handler creation
+
+### Minimal Mocking Strategy
+- Patch only what `tool_handler` directly touches
+- Avoid over-mocked setup from previous implementation
+- Assert exact side effects we care about
+
+## Style Compliance
+
+- **Variable Birth Adjacent**: All variables declared immediately before first use
+- **Explicit Typing**: All function parameters and return types annotated
+- **Early Returns**: Cancellation check at function entry for fail-fast behavior
+- **No Magic Literals**: Symbolic constants used throughout
+
+## Dependencies
+
+- `asyncio.exceptions.CancelledError` for cancellation behavior
+- `unittest.mock.AsyncMock` for async function mocking
+- `prompt_toolkit.application.run_in_terminal` for terminal operations
+
+## Testing Approach
+
+1. **Golden Baseline First**: Capture current behavior before changes
+2. **Focused Assertions**: Test only the specific paths we care about
+3. **Minimal Patching**: Mock only direct dependencies
+4. **Clear Intent**: Intention-revealing test names and fixtures
+
+## Impact Assessment
+
+- **Backward Compatibility**: Maintained - no functional changes to `tool_handler`
+- **Test Coverage**: Improved - more focused and reliable tests
+- **Maintenance**: Reduced - simpler test setup and clearer intent
+- **Performance**: No impact - same execution paths

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/.claude/delta_summaries/api_change_logs.json

@@ -1,6 +1,19 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
   "sessions": [
+    {
+      "id": "tool-rejection-feedback-20251010-000000",
+      "time": "2025-10-10T00:00:00",
+      "branch": "master",
+      "base": "current",
+      "head": "current",
+      "bullets": [
+        "ToolConfirmationResponse gains an optional instructions field emitted when the user rejects a tool.",
+        "ToolHandler.process_confirmation now calls create_user_message with rejection guidance so the agent can react.",
+        "ToolUI prompts for corrective instructions during option 3 without altering approval or skip semantics.",
+        "process_request stops emitting the legacy \"Operation aborted\" UI banner after guided aborts."
+      ]
+    },
     {
       "id": "triple-redundancy-removal-20250919-115649",
       "time": "2025-09-19T11:56:49",
@@ -91,6 +104,18 @@
         "RENAMED publish workflow file back to publish-release.yml so docs and automation match",
         "ADDED version characterization test ensuring pyproject and constants stay synchronized"
       ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "version-bump-0.0.77.3-20251010-120000",
+      "time": "2025-10-10T12:00:00",
+      "branch": "master",
+      "base": "current",
+      "head": "current",
+      "bullets": [
+        "BUMPED project metadata and Hatch script versions to 0.0.77.3 for the upcoming release",
+        "SYNCHRONIZED src/tunacode/constants.APP_VERSION with the new patch number",
+        "UPDATED release documentation and changelog to guide GitHub release creation"
+      ]
     }
   ]
 }

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/.claude/delta_summaries/behavior_changes.json

@@ -1,6 +1,32 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
   "sessions": [
+    {
+      "id": "tool-rejection-feedback-20251010-000000",
+      "time": "2025-10-10T00:00:00Z",
+      "branch": "master",
+      "base": "current",
+      "head": "current",
+      "bullets": [
+        "Tool confirmation option 3 now prompts for follow-up guidance instead of silently aborting.",
+        "ToolHandler injects user-provided rejection instructions into session messages for the agent to read.",
+        "Skip-future and approval flows remain unchanged; only the abort path gains guidance capture.",
+        "REPL no longer prints the \"Operation aborted\" banner once guidance has been captured."
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "context-py-removal-20251003-000000",
+      "time": "2025-10-03T00:00:00Z",
+      "branch": "master",
+      "base": "current",
+      "head": "current",
+      "bullets": [
+        "Removed src/tunacode/context.py - identified as completely dead code with zero production usage",
+        "Context functions were never imported or called in production code, only existed in test files",
+        "Actual context loading uses agent_config.py:load_tunacode_context() directly, bypassing context.py entirely",
+        "Dead code analysis tools failed to detect this unused module despite it having no production dependencies"
+      ]
+    },
     {
       "id": "check-file-length-cache-exclusion-20251005-000001",
       "time": "2025-10-05T00:00:01Z",
@@ -58,6 +84,18 @@
         "Added characterization test asserting APP_VERSION stays aligned with both pyproject version declarations."
       ]
     },
+    {
+      "id": "version-metadata-0.0.77.3-20251010-120001",
+      "time": "2025-10-10T12:00:01Z",
+      "branch": "master",
+      "base": "current",
+      "head": "current",
+      "bullets": [
+        "Updated pyproject version metadata and hatch script declarations to 0.0.77.3.",
+        "Synchronized src/tunacode/constants.APP_VERSION with the new 0.0.77.3 release number.",
+        "Refreshed changelog and publishing workflow documentation to point at the 0.0.77.3 release process."
+      ]
+    },
     {
       "id": "version-bump-0.0.77-20251001-190636",
       "time": "2025-10-01T19:06:36Z",

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/.claude/delta_summaries/reasoning_logs.json

@@ -1,6 +1,32 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
   "sessions": [
+    {
+      "id": "tool-rejection-feedback-20251010-000001",
+      "time": "2025-10-10T00:00:01Z",
+      "branch": "master",
+      "base": "current",
+      "head": "current",
+      "reasoning": {
+        "problem": "Option 3 in the tool confirmation dialog promised to collect corrective guidance but only aborted tool execution.",
+        "why_change": "Agents need the user's replacement instructions to continue productively after a rejection, otherwise the workflow stalls without direction.",
+        "solution": "Expanded ToolUI to prompt for instructions, extended ToolConfirmationResponse with an instructions field, and taught ToolHandler.process_confirmation to dispatch the guidance via create_user_message when the tool is aborted.",
+        "benefits": [
+          "Agents immediately see what to do after a rejected tool call",
+          "Keeps skip-future and approval flows untouched, minimizing surface area",
+          "Characterization coverage documents both legacy abort behavior and the new guidance routing",
+          "REPL output stays quiet—no more legacy abort banner once guidance is captured"
+        ],
+        "risks": [
+          "Empty guidance texts would generate noise",
+          "Potential for duplicate prompts if the UI loop miscounts inputs"
+        ],
+        "mitigations": [
+          "Strip and ignore empty instructions before creating messages",
+          "Golden test ensures option sequencing remains stable"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
     {
       "id": "publish-workflow-slim-20251001-195209",
       "time": "2025-10-01T19:52:09Z",
@@ -47,6 +73,31 @@
         ]
       }
     },
+    {
+      "id": "version-bump-0.0.77.3-20251010-120002",
+      "time": "2025-10-10T12:00:02Z",
+      "branch": "master",
+      "base": "current",
+      "head": "current",
+      "reasoning": {
+        "problem": "All release metadata still advertised v0.0.77.2, so a fresh GitHub release would fail the version consistency checks baked into the publishing workflow.",
+        "why_change": "Preparing v0.0.77.3 demands that pyproject, hatch scripts, runtime constants, documentation, and knowledge base references share the same patch number.",
+        "solution": "Increment pyproject version declarations, update src/tunacode/constants.APP_VERSION and uv.lock, refresh changelog and publishing docs, and synchronize .claude anchors and delta summaries to the new release number.",
+        "benefits": [
+          "Guarantees the GitHub release workflow sees matching metadata before packaging",
+          "Keeps maintainers and future agents aligned on the current release number and commands",
+          "Extends knowledge base traceability so the 0.0.77.3 bump is discoverable via RAG tooling"
+        ],
+        "risks": [
+          "Missing an embedded version string would leave inconsistent metadata",
+          "Knowledge base edits could drift from the source files if the version changes again soon"
+        ],
+        "mitigations": [
+          "Searched repository for the previous version string and updated every hit in code and docs",
+          "Captured the change in .claude delta summaries and refreshed the memory anchor for APP_VERSION"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
     {
       "id": "version-bump-0.0.77-20251001-190642",
       "time": "2025-10-01T19:06:42Z",

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/.claude/docs_model_friendly/component_purpose.md

@@ -65,13 +65,22 @@ This document describes the purpose and responsibilities of each component in th
 
 #### 4.1 Tool Executor (`tool_executor.py`)
 
-**Purpose**: Coordinates parallel execution of tools with proper error handling.
+**Purpose**: Coordinates tool execution with fail-fast cancellation and handler instantiation.
 
 **Key Responsibilities**:
-- Execute tools in parallel for performance
-- Handle tool execution errors gracefully
-- Provide fallback mechanisms for failed tools
-- Aggregate tool results
+- Execute tools with immediate cancellation when operation_cancelled=True
+- Manage ToolHandler lifecycle (create if None, reuse existing)
+- Handle tool confirmation dialogs and plan mode restrictions
+- Coordinate with prompt_toolkit for terminal interactions
+- Provide graceful error handling for user aborts
+
+**Critical Behavior Patterns**:
+- **Fail-Fast Cancellation**: Checks `state_manager.session.operation_cancelled` before any processing
+- **Handler Instantiation**: Creates `ToolHandler(state_manager)` only when needed, caches in `state_manager.tool_handler`
+- **Confirmation Flow**: Uses `run_in_terminal` for synchronous confirmation dialogs
+- **Plan Mode Enforcement**: Blocks write-only tools in plan mode with clear error messages
+
+**Test Coverage**: Golden baseline tests in `tests/characterization/repl_components/test_tool_handler.py` with semantic anchor `8f5a4d92`
 
 #### 4.2 Tool Buffer (`tool_buffer.py`)
 

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/.claude/docs_model_friendly/component_relationships.md

@@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ JSON Tool Parser → Tool Buffer → Tool Executor → Parallel Execution
 - **JSON Tool Parser** handles JSON-formatted tool calls
 - **Result Aggregation** combines tool results
 
+#### Rejection Guidance Loop
+
+- When the user rejects a tool via option 3, **ToolUI** now prompts for corrective guidance and stores it on `ToolConfirmationResponse.instructions`.
+- **ToolHandler.process_confirmation** detects guided aborts and calls `agent_helpers.create_user_message` so the agent receives the user's corrective instructions on the next turn.
+- The REPL suppresses the legacy "Operation aborted" banner once guidance is captured, keeping the transcript focused on the new instructions instead of noise.
+
 ## Dependency Graph
 
 ### Core Dependencies

tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3/.claude/memory_anchors/anchors.json

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+{
+  "version": 1,
+  "generated": "2025-09-26T17:12:31Z",
+  "anchors": [
+    {
+      "key": "d595ceb5",
+      "path": "src/tunacode/core/agents/main.py",
+      "line": 34,
+      "kind": "line",
+      "description": "Direct UI console import aligns with removal of defensive shim",
+      "status": "active",
+      "created": "2025-09-26T17:12:31Z"
+    },
+    {
+      "key": "f4dc6db7",
+      "path": "src/tunacode/constants.py",
+      "line": 12,
+      "kind": "line",
+      "description": "APP_VERSION updated to 0.0.77.3; keep in sync with pyproject metadata for releases.",
+      "status": "active",
+      "created": "2025-10-10T00:00:00Z"
+    },
+    {
+      "key": "9e2d3a1c",
+      "path": "tests/characterization/version/test_version_metadata.py",
+      "line": 1,
+      "kind": "file",
+      "description": "Golden characterization test pinning APP_VERSION to pyproject metadata to guard release workflow failures.",
+      "status": "active",
+      "created": "2025-10-02T00:00:00Z"
+    },
+    {
+      "key": "8f5a4d92",
+      "path": "tests/characterization/repl_components/test_tool_handler.py",
+      "line": 18,
+      "kind": "line",
+      "description": "Golden baseline for tool_handler cancellation and handler creation - fail-fast behavior and instantiation path",
+      "status": "active",
+      "created": "2025-10-03T00:00:00Z"
+    },
+    {
+      "key": "3c8b1f70",
+      "path": "src/tunacode/core/tool_handler.py",
+      "line": 82,
+      "kind": "line",
+      "description": "Abort path routes user rejection guidance into create_user_message so the agent can react next turn.",
+      "status": "active",
+      "created": "2025-10-10T00:00:00Z"
+    },
+    {
+      "key": "7b2c1d4e",
+      "path": "src/tunacode/cli/repl.py",
+      "line": 392,
+      "kind": "line",
+      "description": "Guided aborts skip the legacy 'Operation aborted' banner; UI stays focused on user instructions.",
+      "status": "active",
+      "created": "2025-10-10T00:00:00Z"
+    }
+  ]
+}

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/.claude/metadata/file_classifications.json

@@ -125,6 +125,21 @@
       "classification": "implementation",
       "type": "source"
     },
+    "src/tunacode/core/tool_handler.py": {
+      "category": "core",
+      "classification": "implementation",
+      "type": "source"
+    },
+    "src/tunacode/types.py": {
+      "category": "core",
+      "classification": "support",
+      "type": "source"
+    },
+    "src/tunacode/ui/tool_ui.py": {
+      "category": "ui",
+      "classification": "interface",
+      "type": "source"
+    },
     "tests/characterization/agent/test_agent_creation.py": {
       "category": "agent",
       "classification": "test",
@@ -155,6 +170,21 @@
       "classification": "test",
       "type": "test"
     },
+    "tests/characterization/ui/test_tool_confirmations.py": {
+      "category": "ui",
+      "classification": "test",
+      "type": "test"
+    },
+    "tests/characterization/repl/test_error_handling.py": {
+      "category": "repl",
+      "classification": "test",
+      "type": "test"
+    },
+    "tests/test_plan_mode.py": {
+      "category": "plan_mode",
+      "classification": "test",
+      "type": "test"
+    },
     "tests/unit/test_react_tool.py": {
       "category": "tools",
       "classification": "test",

tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3/.claude/qa/context_logs/latest_session.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+tool-rejection-feedback-20251010-000001

tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3/.claude/qa/context_logs/tool-rejection-feedback-20251010-000001/summary.md

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+# Tool Rejection Feedback Session
+
+- Option 3 in the tool confirmation dialog now collects user guidance via `ToolUI`, storing it on `ToolConfirmationResponse.instructions`.
+- `ToolHandler.process_confirmation` detects guided aborts and calls `create_user_message`, injecting the corrective instructions into the session timeline for the agent.
+- Characterization coverage keeps the legacy abort baseline while the new plan mode test ensures rejection guidance is recorded.
+- No changes to approval or skip semantics; only the abort path gains the guidance recording behavior.
+- REPL skips the old "Operation aborted" banner so the agent immediately focuses on the injected guidance message.

tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3/.claude/qa/reasoning_docs/tool-rejection-feedback-20251010-000001.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+# Tool Rejection Feedback Reasoning Log
+
+## Problem Signal
+- Users selecting option 3 "No, and tell TunaCode what to do differently" triggered `UserAbortError` without collecting any guidance.
+- Research document 2025-10-10_11-44-51_userabort_error_analysis.md confirmed this path was intentionally aborting but lacked the promised feedback hook.
+
+## Approach
+1. Captured a golden baseline around the existing abort path to guard regressions.
+2. Introduced a failing test asserting that rejection guidance becomes a session message the next agent turn can consume.
+3. Extended `ToolConfirmationResponse` with an `instructions` field, updated `ToolUI` to prompt for guidance, and routed non-empty guidance through `create_user_message` in `ToolHandler.process_confirmation`.
+
+## Outcome
+- Agents now receive explicit user instructions after a rejected tool call, removing ambiguity around option 3.
+- Approval and skip logic remains unchanged; only aborts now append corrective guidance.
+- Characterization coverage documents both the baseline abort behavior and the new guidance routing.
+- The REPL no longer prints the legacy "Operation aborted" banner, preventing noise after guided aborts.

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/.claude/semantic_index/function_call_graphs.json

@@ -262,6 +262,49 @@
           "purpose": "Inject guidance as system prompt to influence next LLM turn"
         }
       ]
+    },
+    "tool_handler_flow": {
+      "description": "Tool execution handler with fail-fast cancellation and instantiation",
+      "entry_point": "tunacode.cli.repl_components.tool_executor.tool_handler",
+      "flow": [
+        {
+          "step": 1,
+          "function": "cancellation_check",
+          "location": "tool_executor.py:31-34",
+          "purpose": "Fail-fast cancellation when operation_cancelled=True",
+          "raises": "CancelledError"
+        },
+        {
+          "step": 2,
+          "function": "handler_instantiation",
+          "location": "tool_executor.py:37-41",
+          "purpose": "Create ToolHandler if not exists, reuse existing instance",
+          "dependency": "tunacode.core.tool_handler.ToolHandler"
+        },
+        {
+          "step": 3,
+          "function": "confirmation_flow",
+          "location": "tool_executor.py:43-84",
+          "purpose": "Handle tool confirmation dialogs and plan mode restrictions",
+          "dependency": "prompt_toolkit.application.run_in_terminal"
+        },
+        {
+          "step": 4,
+          "function": "user_feedback_routing",
+          "location": "core/tool_handler.py:60-93",
+          "purpose": "Convert rejection guidance into an inline user message the agent can consume",
+          "dependency": "agent_components.agent_helpers.create_user_message"
+        }
+      ],
+      "test_coverage": {
+        "file": "tests/characterization/repl_components/test_tool_handler.py",
+        "anchor": "8f5a4d92",
+        "behaviors_tested": [
+          "fail_fast_cancellation",
+          "handler_instantiation_without_confirmation",
+          "rejection_feedback_routing"
+        ]
+      }
     }
   },
   "refactor_summary": {

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/.claude/semantic_index/intent_mappings.json

@@ -100,6 +100,17 @@
           "inject_system_prompt"
         ],
         "state_dependency": "increments SessionState.react_forced_calls"
+      },
+      "ToolHandler.process_confirmation": {
+        "file": "src/tunacode/core/tool_handler.py",
+        "intent": "TOOL_CONFIRMATION_ROUTING",
+        "purpose": "Resolve confirmation responses, persist trust choices, and surface rejection guidance to the agent",
+        "semantic_role": "Bridge between UI confirmation responses and agent state",
+        "key_responsibilities": [
+          "Persist skip-future decisions per tool",
+          "Abort execution when approval is denied",
+          "Promote rejection instructions into session user messages via create_user_message"
+        ]
       }
     },
     "node_processing": {

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/.claude/semantic_index/type_relationships.json

@@ -61,6 +61,25 @@
           "completion_detection": "Integrated with state machine",
           "thread_safety": "Through AgentStateMachine"
         }
+      },
+      "ToolConfirmationResponse": {
+        "definition": "src/tunacode/types.py",
+        "purpose": "Structured response emitted by tool confirmation dialogs",
+        "fields": {
+          "approved": "bool flag to allow tool execution",
+          "skip_future": "bool flag to trust future calls without prompting",
+          "abort": "bool flag indicating the tool should not run",
+          "instructions": "str with optional user guidance when aborting"
+        },
+        "relationships": {
+          "produced_by": [
+            "ToolUI.show_confirmation",
+            "ToolUI.show_sync_confirmation"
+          ],
+          "consumed_by": [
+            "ToolHandler.process_confirmation"
+          ]
+        }
       }
     },
     "state_machine_types": {

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: tunacode-cli
-Version: 0.0.77.2
+Version: 0.0.77.3
 Summary: Your agentic CLI developer.
 Project-URL: Homepage, https://tunacode.xyz/
 Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/alchemiststudiosDOTai/tunacode

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/documentation/changelog/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@ All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
 The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
 and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
 
+## [0.0.77.3] - 2025-10-10
+
+### Changed
+- Bump project metadata and runtime constants to 0.0.77.3 to prepare the GitHub release workflow.
+
 ## [0.0.77.2] - 2025-10-02
 
 ### Changed

{tunacode_cli-0.0.77.2 → tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3}/documentation/development/publishing-workflow.md

@@ -25,12 +25,12 @@ The project uses GitHub Actions to automatically publish releases to PyPI when a
 2. **Commit Changes**: Commit the version updates to the master branch
 3. **Create Tag**: Create and push a version tag:
    ```bash
-   git tag v0.0.77.2
-   git push origin v0.0.77.2
+   git tag v0.0.77.3
+   git push origin v0.0.77.3
    ```
 4. **Create Release**: Create a GitHub release:
    ```bash
-   gh release create v0.0.77.2 --generate-notes
+   gh release create v0.0.77.3 --generate-notes
    ```
 
 ### Workflow Steps
@@ -97,19 +97,19 @@ The workflow is configured in `.github/workflows/publish-release.yml` and:
 ## Example Release Commands
 
 ```bash
-# Update version to 0.0.77.2
-sed -i 's/version = "0.0.77.1"/version = "0.0.77.2"/g' pyproject.toml
-sed -i 's/APP_VERSION = "0.0.77.1"/APP_VERSION = "0.0.77.2"/' src/tunacode/constants.py
+# Update version to 0.0.77.3
+sed -i 's/version = "0.0.77.2"/version = "0.0.77.3"/g' pyproject.toml
+sed -i 's/APP_VERSION = "0.0.77.2"/APP_VERSION = "0.0.77.3"/' src/tunacode/constants.py
 
 # Commit and tag
 git add pyproject.toml src/tunacode/constants.py
-git commit -m "chore: bump version to 0.0.77.2"
-git tag v0.0.77.2
+git commit -m "chore: bump version to 0.0.77.3"
+git tag v0.0.77.3
 git push origin master
-git push origin v0.0.77.2
+git push origin v0.0.77.3
 
 # Create release
-gh release create v0.0.77.2 --generate-notes
+gh release create v0.0.77.3 --generate-notes
 ```
 
 ## Related Documentation

tunacode_cli-0.0.77.3/memory-bank/execute/2025-10-02_14-45-00_release_process_automation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+---
+title: "Release Process Automation – Execution Log"
+phase: Execute
+date: "2025-10-02T14:45:00Z"
+owner: "context-engineer"
+plan_path: "memory-bank/plan/2025-10-02_14-30-45_release_process_automation.md"
+start_commit: "0e5c473"
+env: {target: "local", notes: "Development environment with Hatch and GitHub CLI available"}
+---
+
+## Pre-Flight Checks
+- DoR satisfied? ✅ YES
+  - Hatch build system available: `/usr/local/bin/hatch`
+  - GitHub CLI installed: `/usr/bin/gh`
+  - Write permissions: Confirmed (on master branch)
+  - Python 3.8+ available: Yes
+  - Dependencies installed: Will verify during implementation
+- Access/secrets present? ✅ YES
+  - GitHub CLI available and will be tested during implementation
+  - PyPI token assumed configured (existing setup)
+- Fixtures/data ready? ✅ YES
+  - Current project structure available
+  - Version files identified: `pyproject.toml` (lines 8, 173), `src/tunacode/constants.py:12`
+
+## Status: READY TO PROCEED