star-magic-program 0.441.0__tar.gz → 0.442.0__tar.gz

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/.gitignore

@@ -66,3 +66,8 @@ star_magic_program-*/
 # OPERATOR TIER (v1.71.0): user/operator-supplied field data - private by
 # construction; never committed, never packaged, never published.
 uqff_downhole_simulator/catalog_operator/
+
+# Claude desktop app chat deliverables: the app saves files sent in chat into the
+# connected folder under "Claude outputs/" (v0.442.0 lesson: two such files sat in
+# the repo untracked and SHIP GUARD v8 refused to ship). Not repo content, never packaged.
+Claude outputs/

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -5,6 +5,57 @@ All notable changes to this project are documented here.
 Format: [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/).
 Versioning: [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
 
+## v0.442.0 — 2026-09-17 — Q-251 PRE-STATED TEST SHIP (argon; two predictions committed before the run; neither; Q-252 opened)
+
+- B288 (PAPER_2283): THE Q-251 PRE-STATED TEST. PAPER_2282 had noticed
+  water's k_c/k_c(c_0) = 1.489 on D_BSFG/D_phys = 1.5 and refused to claim
+  it; this band ran the test it named. PRE-REGISTRATION: the predictions
+  and the reading rule were written into RULINGS_QUEUE.md Q-251 and
+  committed to the repo BEFORE any run - P1 = omega_SCm/c_0(NIST 854.35
+  m/s) = 9.19 nm^-1 (Q-247 as ruled), P2 = (D_BSFG/D_phys) x P1 = 13.79,
+  rule +-10 pct; the RESULT is appended beneath, the pre-statement
+  unchanged. INSTRUMENT: the B287 engine's LJ path - md_grade/lj_kernel.c
+  (cell-list 12-6, energy-shifted at 2.5 sigma, OpenMP), argon_record.py
+  (velocity Verlet 4 fs, transverse AND longitudinal currents by the B287
+  FFT transform - gridcur.currents3 - correlator, MSD, checkpoint),
+  validate_argon.py (kernel vs numpy 9e-13 kJ/mol; F = -grad E 6e-9; NVE
+  +0.00001 kJ/mol per atom over 10 ps; E/N -5.16 eps). State point: NIST
+  argon 85 K / 0.101325 MPa (rho 21.25 nm^-3, c_0 854.35, eta 0.2795 mPa s
+  - read through the browser pane). RUNS: 4096 atoms, L 5.78 nm, 36 shells
+  to 26 nm^-1, 2 seeds x 400 ps, 8-fs sampling. TRANSPORT CHECK: eta_0
+  plateau 0.2743 / 0.2767 +- 0.005 vs NIST 0.2795; D 1.81 / 1.80 e-5 vs
+  the LJ literature 1.6-1.8. RESULT: eta(k) Gaussian over the water-
+  comparable range k <= 14 (chi2 43/46 vs Lorentzian 94/111, n = 27) with
+  k_c 7.25 +- 0.06 / 7.09 +- 0.06 -> POOLED 7.17 +- 0.05 nm^-1 (harness
+  7.16; direct 1/e crossing 12.4); beyond k ~ 14 the tail is slower than
+  Gaussian (full-range chi2 ~1100, both shapes) - the fit range was not
+  pre-specified, both are reported, neither rescues a prediction. THE
+  RULE APPLIED: k_c/P1 = 0.78, k_c/P2 = 0.52 -> NEITHER within 10 pct ->
+  Q-251 CLOSED NEGATIVE (water's 1.489 was a coincidence); P1 negative for
+  argon (-22 pct) as for water (+49 pct); eta/eta_0 at P1 0.57 and at P2
+  0.28 against the predicted 0.709. OBSERVATION (recorded, NOT claimed):
+  c_0 differs 1.73x between the liquids, the measured k_c 1.10x; k_c x
+  sigma = 2.50 (water, sigma_OO 0.3159) and 2.44 (argon, 0.3405) - the
+  eta(k) cutoff tracks the molecular diameter, not omega_SCm/c_s (the
+  generalized-hydrodynamics expectation). Q-252 OPENED, Daniel-gated: (a)
+  the sound-cone k_c is a different object from the eta(k) cutoff (front
+  4 a category error; Theorem B untouched and untested by it), (b) the
+  framework fluid cutoff is falsified as written, (c) other. Nothing
+  further on front 4 until it is ruled.
+  WIRED: q251_prestated_test(), q251_argon_grade() (pure arithmetic;
+  reproduces scipy), front4_rulings() Q-251 CLOSED / Q-252 OPEN; dispatch
+  PAPER_2283 (2,334); proof-set front-4 line extended; registry +4 rows
+  (q251_argon_prestated_test, q251_argon_eta_k, q251_argon_grade,
+  eta_k_cutoff_tracks_molecular_diameter) and 2 edited
+  (fluid_cutoff_scale_ratio_q251 -> CLOSED_NEGATIVE; closeout); GRAPH +5;
+  9 satellites B288; GAPS b288 + Rule-7 row; RULINGS_QUEUE Q-251 result +
+  Q-252; WHITEPAPER_INDEX 2283; gate pin B288 (6,115); md_grade +13
+  files (gridcur.py updated). Registry 7,141 rows; gate 6,115/0;
+  simulator untouched. NOT claimed: which reading of Q-252; the model's
+  own c_0 (not cleanly measured); anything beyond two liquids at one
+  state point each; anything about Theorems A and B beyond their stated
+  independence from the coefficient.
+
 ## v0.441.0 — 2026-09-17 — FRONT 4 RECORD RUN SHIP (an SPME engine, four runs, k_c 7.90 +- 0.05, the falsifier applied, three rulings folded)
 
 - B287 (PAPER_2282): FRONT 4, THE RECORD RUN. The B286b measurement (one

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/CITATION.cff

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ message: "If you use Star-Magic-Program (UQFF systematic rebuild) in your resear
 type: software
 title: "Star-Magic-Program: UQFF Systematic Rebuild"
 abbreviation: "UQFF"
-version: "0.441.0"
+version: "0.442.0"
 date-released: "2026-09-15"
 authors:
   - family-names: "Murphy"
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ preferred-citation:
     - family-names: "Murphy"
       given-names: "Daniel T."
   year: 2026
-  version: "0.441.0"
+  version: "0.442.0"
   url: "https://github.com/Daniel8Murphy0007/Star-Magic-Program"
   notes: >-
     Cite both the software and the relevant whitepapers by PAPER_N

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: star-magic-program
-Version: 0.441.0
-Summary: Star-Magic UQFF calculator v0.441.0: FRONT 4 RECORD RUN SHIP (PAPER_2282) - a particle-mesh Ewald engine written and validated for it (Madelung 1.747565; NVE 1e-4 kJ/mol); four runs, two boxes, three seeds: eta(k) of TIP4P/2005 water Gaussian with k_c 7.90 +- 0.05 nm^-1 - c_0 x 1.49, fast sound excluded, shear waves from 1.0-1.4 nm^-1; the pre-stated falsifier applied: NEGATIVE on the 0.344 coefficient, POSITIVE on shape; Q-247/Q-250/Q-246 ruled, Q-251 opened; gate 6,114/0.
+Version: 0.442.0
+Summary: Star-Magic UQFF calculator v0.442.0: Q-251 PRE-STATED TEST SHIP (PAPER_2283) - two predictions for Lennard-Jones argon committed to the repo before the run (k_c 9.19 or 13.79 nm^-1), measured k_c 7.17 +- 0.05: neither; Q-251 closed negative; the eta(k) cutoff tracks the molecular diameter in both liquids (k_c sigma 2.50 / 2.44), not omega_SCm/c_s - opened as Q-252, Daniel-gated; gate 6,115/0.
 Author-email: "Daniel T. Murphy" <daniel.murphy00@enrgyone.com>
 License: AGPL-3.0-or-later OR LicenseRef-StarMagic-Commercial
 Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/Daniel8Murphy0007/Star-Magic-Program
@@ -41,17 +41,17 @@ Dynamic: license-file
 
 # Star-Magic-Program
 
-[![PyPI version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/star-magic-program.svg?cacheBust=0.441.0)](https://pypi.org/project/star-magic-program/)
-[![Python versions](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/star-magic-program.svg?cacheBust=0.441.0)](https://pypi.org/project/star-magic-program/)
+[![PyPI version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/star-magic-program.svg?cacheBust=0.442.0)](https://pypi.org/project/star-magic-program/)
+[![Python versions](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/star-magic-program.svg?cacheBust=0.442.0)](https://pypi.org/project/star-magic-program/)
 [![Documentation Status](https://readthedocs.org/projects/star-magic-program/badge/?version=latest)](https://star-magic-program.readthedocs.io/en/latest/?badge=latest)
 [![License: AGPL-3.0 + Commercial](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-AGPL--3.0%20%2B%20Commercial-blue.svg)](LICENSE)
-[![Fidelity gate](https://img.shields.io/badge/fidelity_gate-6114%2F0-brightgreen)](uqff_fidelity_tests.py)
-[![Public surfaces](https://img.shields.io/badge/public_surfaces-2333-blue)](uqff_calculator.py)
-[![Whitepapers](https://img.shields.io/badge/whitepapers-2327-orange)](whitepapers/)
+[![Fidelity gate](https://img.shields.io/badge/fidelity_gate-6115%2F0-brightgreen)](uqff_fidelity_tests.py)
+[![Public surfaces](https://img.shields.io/badge/public_surfaces-2334-blue)](uqff_calculator.py)
+[![Whitepapers](https://img.shields.io/badge/whitepapers-2328-orange)](whitepapers/)
 
-**UQFF systematic rebuild — v0.441.0 complete-compile campaign live**
+**UQFF systematic rebuild — v0.442.0 complete-compile campaign live**
 
-**This release (v0.441.0): FRONT 4, THE RECORD RUN — a particle-mesh Ewald engine written and validated for it, four runs in two boxes with three seeds, and the number did not move.** v0.440.0 measured the wavevector-dependent shear viscosity η(k) of TIP4P/2005 water once — reaction field, 20-fs sampling, one seed — and found the roll-off at k_c ≈ 7.8 nm⁻¹. B287 (PAPER_2282) is the record run that measurement called for. A second engine was written for it: smooth particle-mesh Ewald electrostatics, the pair kernel, RATTLE and the B-spline spreading in C, the transverse currents by an FFT momentum-density transform — validated on a ladder that ends at the Madelung constant of NaCl (1.747565, exact to 1e-7), forces = −∇E to 3e-8, energy conservation to −0.0001 kJ/mol per molecule over 2 ps, and the model’s own transport (η₀ 0.84–0.85 vs 0.855 mPa·s; D 2.3–2.4e-5 cm²/s). Four runs: 2,197 molecules in a 4.04 nm box for 300 ps at seeds 11, 12, 13, and 8,000 molecules in a 6.21 nm box for 200 ps, sampled every 4 fs on the centre-of-mass and atomic currents. **Result: η(k) rolls off as a GAUSSIAN with k_c = 7.90 ± 0.05 nm⁻¹** (seeds 7.89 / 7.89 / 7.94; the 6 nm box 7.93 ± 0.10; χ² Gaussian 33 vs Lorentzian 192). Against the framework: c_0 gives 5.31 (factor 1.49; at that k the measured suppression is 14 % where PAPER_2275 says 29 %), c_∞ gives 2.45 (factor 3.2, EXCLUDED). The 6 nm box also finds where shear waves begin: between 1.0 and 1.4 nm⁻¹ — four to five times below k_c(c_0). **The falsifier stated in PAPER_2281 §4 is applied as written: front 4 CLOSES NEGATIVE ON THE COEFFICIENT** (the 1/e wavenumber, 13.5, lies far from both 9.05 and 4.19) **and POSITIVE ON EXISTENCE AND SHAPE** (Gaussian, on the sound-cone scale, fast sound excluded). Three rulings folded on this evidence (Daniel, 2026-09-17): Q-247 c_0 stands — and the literal 1480 m/s is re-provenanced (it entered at PAPER_2267 L53; PAPER_2261 carries seawater as a density only); Q-250 η(k) on the centre-of-mass current is the canonical reading of transfer; Q-246 the PAPER_1042 Gaussian tail is canonized. One opened, not ruled: the measured ratio 1.489 ± 0.010 sits on D_BSFG/D_phys = 1.5 (Q-251) — post-hoc, one liquid, one temperature, written down as an observation. Not claimed: front 4 passed; the 8 nm / 1 ns plateau (not run — the workspace suspends between turns; the 4 nm seeds and the 6 nm box were chosen instead); anything about real water beyond the model. **Totals: 2,278 wired (2,333 DISPATCH keys) / gate 6,114 green / 4,205 defs / acceptance 109 green / registry 7,137 rows / results table 187 rows at ZERO inherited / backlog 0 Daniel-gated + 1 observation-gated candidate / catalogue 52 public entries + operator tier.**
+**This release (v0.442.0): THE Q-251 PRE-STATED TEST — two predictions committed to the repository before the run, a second liquid, and neither prediction survived.** v0.441.0 measured water’s η(k) cutoff at 1.489 × the framework’s k_c(c_0) and noticed that 1.489 sits on D_BSFG/D_phys = 1.5 — and declined to claim it, naming the test that could: a second liquid with the ratio predicted first. B288 (PAPER_2283) is that test. Lennard-Jones argon at the NIST 85 K state point (c_0 = 854.35 m/s, read from the WebBook). Written into RULINGS_QUEUE.md and committed before a single step ran: P1, the Q-247 form, k_c = ω_SCm/c_0 = 9.19 nm⁻¹; P2, the Q-251 route, 1.5 × that = 13.79; reading rule ±10 %. The engine’s LJ path was validated the same way as the water engine (kernel exact, forces = −∇E to 6e-9, NVE drift 1e-5 kJ/mol per atom over 10 ps) and reproduces NIST’s viscosity to 1–2 % and the literature diffusion coefficient. **Measured: k_c = 7.25 ± 0.06 and 7.09 ± 0.06 in two seeds, pooled 7.17 ± 0.05 nm⁻¹**, Gaussian over the water-comparable range. Ratio to P1 0.78; to P2 0.52. **Neither. Q-251 is CLOSED NEGATIVE** by the rule written before the data — water’s 1.489 was a coincidence — and the sound-cone form P1, already negative for water (+49 %), is negative for argon too (−22 %). What the two liquids say together, recorded and not claimed: their sound speeds differ by 1.73×, their cutoffs by 1.10×, and k_c·σ = 2.50 (water) and 2.44 (argon). The cutoff of η(k) tracks the molecular diameter, not ω_SCm/c_s — the ordinary generalized-hydrodynamics expectation. Whether that means the sound-cone k_c is a different object from what η(k) measures (front 4 a category error; Theorem B untouched but untested) or that the framework’s fluid cutoff is falsified as written is **Q-252, opened against the program itself and left to Daniel.** Not claimed: which reading; the model’s own c_0 (not cleanly measured — P1 evaluated with NIST’s, as pre-stated); the fit range (not pre-specified; both reported; neither rescues a prediction). **Totals: 2,279 wired (2,334 DISPATCH keys) / gate 6,115 green / 4,206 defs / acceptance 109 green / registry 7,141 rows / results table 187 rows at ZERO inherited / backlog 0 Daniel-gated + 1 observation-gated candidate / catalogue 52 public entries + operator tier.**
 
 Author: Daniel T. Murphy · Star-Magic Research Program
 License: AGPL-3.0-or-later OR Commercial
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ License: AGPL-3.0-or-later OR Commercial
 
 Per Daniel's 2026-08-08 directive, headline numbers are reported at BOTH scopes:
 
-**Census — one number, one source:** the release banner above carries the LIVE figures (2,278 distinct wired papers / 2,333 dispatch keys, gate assertions, registry rows), verified on every gate run by the ship guards. The per-era census snapshots that used to live here (the 1,417-frontier / 4,717-assertion / 25,126-row figures) were frozen history masquerading as status — killed at v0.413.0 per independent evaluation; era history lives in CHANGELOG and SESSION_LOG where history belongs.
+**Census — one number, one source:** the release banner above carries the LIVE figures (2,279 distinct wired papers / 2,334 dispatch keys, gate assertions, registry rows), verified on every gate run by the ship guards. The per-era census snapshots that used to live here (the 1,417-frontier / 4,717-assertion / 25,126-row figures) were frozen history masquerading as status — killed at v0.413.0 per independent evaluation; era history lives in CHANGELOG and SESSION_LOG where history belongs.
 
 **Single-file scope** (used for per-band deltas): calculator defs, main-registry rows,
 gate assertions, dispatch count — always labeled as such in CHANGELOG/SESSION_LOG entries.
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Mizuno, Rossi).
 Full framework physics lives in the whitepaper corpus — the physics is the
 whitepapers; the calculator computes what the whitepapers derive.
 
-## What is currently shipped (v0.441.0)
+## What is currently shipped (v0.442.0)
 
 ### Wiring campaign — LIVE (see `CLAUDE.md` charter)
 
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ Sequential wiring of all 2,255 whitepapers, starting at PAPER_001.
 Authorized 2026-07-28: autonomous band sessions, ship per session via
 `ship.ps1`, full stop at PAPER_500 for manual review.
 
-**Wired: 2,278 distinct dispatches (2,333 DISPATCH keys incl. the 55 canonical alias numbers 2179-2233)** (one per paper, Rule B closed). **Complete-compile frontier: PAPER_001-1300** (+ b-variants) fully captured over a **1766-function primitive-sourced equation library** — every equation and section (core + Session-225 + Production Framework + Cosmogenesis Lagrangian + VDS/DVP/BSH + Kozima-LENR K.1-K.6) via _common_uqff_blocks, with paper-specific §B DVP prime ladder (gate-guarded), 40/40+ linked-paper mapping, and a campaign-aware XGEO chain.
+**Wired: 2,279 distinct dispatches (2,334 DISPATCH keys incl. the 55 canonical alias numbers 2179-2233)** (one per paper, Rule B closed). **Complete-compile frontier: PAPER_001-1300** (+ b-variants) fully captured over a **1766-function primitive-sourced equation library** — every equation and section (core + Session-225 + Production Framework + Cosmogenesis Lagrangian + VDS/DVP/BSH + Kozima-LENR K.1-K.6) via _common_uqff_blocks, with paper-specific §B DVP prime ladder (gate-guarded), 40/40+ linked-paper mapping, and a campaign-aware XGEO chain.
 
 **Derived-constants catalog (v0.344.0):** all **1,272 unique predecessor-registry derived constants** wired and callable via `uqff_derived_constants.py` — e.g. `derived_constant("alpha_inverse")` → 137.0 (PAPER_1167), `derived_constant("astro_BH_entropy_coeff")` → 0.24833 (PAPER_594). 661 numeric, routes + provenance preserved.
 
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ Authorized 2026-07-28: autonomous band sessions, ship per session via
 
 **Flagship UQFF closed forms now individually callable** (v0.342.0–v0.343.0 predecessor mine): cosmological constant Λ = ρ_SCm·26!·25/12 = 5.957e-10 (Planck), proton mass 938.25 MeV and m_p/m_e = 1836 from integers, H₀ = A_5+SO_5 = 70 EXACT, Ω_Λ = 0.684, Universal Inertial Operator U_i = 2.75e-7 (Sun), Higgs vev 246 GeV, fine-structure α, electron g−2 = 0.001159652, Holmlid 630 eV / Coulomb 626 eV LENR chain, and **all 8 Clay Millennium closures** (Riemann, P≠NP, Yang-Mills=1.736, Poincaré=7/12, Navier-Stokes=0.85, Hodge=1.0, BSD, BH-info).
 
-Registry: **7,137 rows**. Fidelity gate: **6,114 assertions**, green. *(v0.285.0/v0.321.0 burned/yanked on PyPI.)*
+Registry: **7,141 rows**. Fidelity gate: **6,115 assertions**, green. *(v0.285.0/v0.321.0 burned/yanked on PyPI.)*
 
 | Paper | Content | Key result |
 |---|---|---|

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/README.md

@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
 # Star-Magic-Program
 
-[![PyPI version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/star-magic-program.svg?cacheBust=0.441.0)](https://pypi.org/project/star-magic-program/)
-[![Python versions](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/star-magic-program.svg?cacheBust=0.441.0)](https://pypi.org/project/star-magic-program/)
+[![PyPI version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/star-magic-program.svg?cacheBust=0.442.0)](https://pypi.org/project/star-magic-program/)
+[![Python versions](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/star-magic-program.svg?cacheBust=0.442.0)](https://pypi.org/project/star-magic-program/)
 [![Documentation Status](https://readthedocs.org/projects/star-magic-program/badge/?version=latest)](https://star-magic-program.readthedocs.io/en/latest/?badge=latest)
 [![License: AGPL-3.0 + Commercial](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-AGPL--3.0%20%2B%20Commercial-blue.svg)](LICENSE)
-[![Fidelity gate](https://img.shields.io/badge/fidelity_gate-6114%2F0-brightgreen)](uqff_fidelity_tests.py)
-[![Public surfaces](https://img.shields.io/badge/public_surfaces-2333-blue)](uqff_calculator.py)
-[![Whitepapers](https://img.shields.io/badge/whitepapers-2327-orange)](whitepapers/)
+[![Fidelity gate](https://img.shields.io/badge/fidelity_gate-6115%2F0-brightgreen)](uqff_fidelity_tests.py)
+[![Public surfaces](https://img.shields.io/badge/public_surfaces-2334-blue)](uqff_calculator.py)
+[![Whitepapers](https://img.shields.io/badge/whitepapers-2328-orange)](whitepapers/)
 
-**UQFF systematic rebuild — v0.441.0 complete-compile campaign live**
+**UQFF systematic rebuild — v0.442.0 complete-compile campaign live**
 
-**This release (v0.441.0): FRONT 4, THE RECORD RUN — a particle-mesh Ewald engine written and validated for it, four runs in two boxes with three seeds, and the number did not move.** v0.440.0 measured the wavevector-dependent shear viscosity η(k) of TIP4P/2005 water once — reaction field, 20-fs sampling, one seed — and found the roll-off at k_c ≈ 7.8 nm⁻¹. B287 (PAPER_2282) is the record run that measurement called for. A second engine was written for it: smooth particle-mesh Ewald electrostatics, the pair kernel, RATTLE and the B-spline spreading in C, the transverse currents by an FFT momentum-density transform — validated on a ladder that ends at the Madelung constant of NaCl (1.747565, exact to 1e-7), forces = −∇E to 3e-8, energy conservation to −0.0001 kJ/mol per molecule over 2 ps, and the model’s own transport (η₀ 0.84–0.85 vs 0.855 mPa·s; D 2.3–2.4e-5 cm²/s). Four runs: 2,197 molecules in a 4.04 nm box for 300 ps at seeds 11, 12, 13, and 8,000 molecules in a 6.21 nm box for 200 ps, sampled every 4 fs on the centre-of-mass and atomic currents. **Result: η(k) rolls off as a GAUSSIAN with k_c = 7.90 ± 0.05 nm⁻¹** (seeds 7.89 / 7.89 / 7.94; the 6 nm box 7.93 ± 0.10; χ² Gaussian 33 vs Lorentzian 192). Against the framework: c_0 gives 5.31 (factor 1.49; at that k the measured suppression is 14 % where PAPER_2275 says 29 %), c_∞ gives 2.45 (factor 3.2, EXCLUDED). The 6 nm box also finds where shear waves begin: between 1.0 and 1.4 nm⁻¹ — four to five times below k_c(c_0). **The falsifier stated in PAPER_2281 §4 is applied as written: front 4 CLOSES NEGATIVE ON THE COEFFICIENT** (the 1/e wavenumber, 13.5, lies far from both 9.05 and 4.19) **and POSITIVE ON EXISTENCE AND SHAPE** (Gaussian, on the sound-cone scale, fast sound excluded). Three rulings folded on this evidence (Daniel, 2026-09-17): Q-247 c_0 stands — and the literal 1480 m/s is re-provenanced (it entered at PAPER_2267 L53; PAPER_2261 carries seawater as a density only); Q-250 η(k) on the centre-of-mass current is the canonical reading of transfer; Q-246 the PAPER_1042 Gaussian tail is canonized. One opened, not ruled: the measured ratio 1.489 ± 0.010 sits on D_BSFG/D_phys = 1.5 (Q-251) — post-hoc, one liquid, one temperature, written down as an observation. Not claimed: front 4 passed; the 8 nm / 1 ns plateau (not run — the workspace suspends between turns; the 4 nm seeds and the 6 nm box were chosen instead); anything about real water beyond the model. **Totals: 2,278 wired (2,333 DISPATCH keys) / gate 6,114 green / 4,205 defs / acceptance 109 green / registry 7,137 rows / results table 187 rows at ZERO inherited / backlog 0 Daniel-gated + 1 observation-gated candidate / catalogue 52 public entries + operator tier.**
+**This release (v0.442.0): THE Q-251 PRE-STATED TEST — two predictions committed to the repository before the run, a second liquid, and neither prediction survived.** v0.441.0 measured water’s η(k) cutoff at 1.489 × the framework’s k_c(c_0) and noticed that 1.489 sits on D_BSFG/D_phys = 1.5 — and declined to claim it, naming the test that could: a second liquid with the ratio predicted first. B288 (PAPER_2283) is that test. Lennard-Jones argon at the NIST 85 K state point (c_0 = 854.35 m/s, read from the WebBook). Written into RULINGS_QUEUE.md and committed before a single step ran: P1, the Q-247 form, k_c = ω_SCm/c_0 = 9.19 nm⁻¹; P2, the Q-251 route, 1.5 × that = 13.79; reading rule ±10 %. The engine’s LJ path was validated the same way as the water engine (kernel exact, forces = −∇E to 6e-9, NVE drift 1e-5 kJ/mol per atom over 10 ps) and reproduces NIST’s viscosity to 1–2 % and the literature diffusion coefficient. **Measured: k_c = 7.25 ± 0.06 and 7.09 ± 0.06 in two seeds, pooled 7.17 ± 0.05 nm⁻¹**, Gaussian over the water-comparable range. Ratio to P1 0.78; to P2 0.52. **Neither. Q-251 is CLOSED NEGATIVE** by the rule written before the data — water’s 1.489 was a coincidence — and the sound-cone form P1, already negative for water (+49 %), is negative for argon too (−22 %). What the two liquids say together, recorded and not claimed: their sound speeds differ by 1.73×, their cutoffs by 1.10×, and k_c·σ = 2.50 (water) and 2.44 (argon). The cutoff of η(k) tracks the molecular diameter, not ω_SCm/c_s — the ordinary generalized-hydrodynamics expectation. Whether that means the sound-cone k_c is a different object from what η(k) measures (front 4 a category error; Theorem B untouched but untested) or that the framework’s fluid cutoff is falsified as written is **Q-252, opened against the program itself and left to Daniel.** Not claimed: which reading; the model’s own c_0 (not cleanly measured — P1 evaluated with NIST’s, as pre-stated); the fit range (not pre-specified; both reported; neither rescues a prediction). **Totals: 2,279 wired (2,334 DISPATCH keys) / gate 6,115 green / 4,206 defs / acceptance 109 green / registry 7,141 rows / results table 187 rows at ZERO inherited / backlog 0 Daniel-gated + 1 observation-gated candidate / catalogue 52 public entries + operator tier.**
 
 Author: Daniel T. Murphy · Star-Magic Research Program
 License: AGPL-3.0-or-later OR Commercial
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ License: AGPL-3.0-or-later OR Commercial
 
 Per Daniel's 2026-08-08 directive, headline numbers are reported at BOTH scopes:
 
-**Census — one number, one source:** the release banner above carries the LIVE figures (2,278 distinct wired papers / 2,333 dispatch keys, gate assertions, registry rows), verified on every gate run by the ship guards. The per-era census snapshots that used to live here (the 1,417-frontier / 4,717-assertion / 25,126-row figures) were frozen history masquerading as status — killed at v0.413.0 per independent evaluation; era history lives in CHANGELOG and SESSION_LOG where history belongs.
+**Census — one number, one source:** the release banner above carries the LIVE figures (2,279 distinct wired papers / 2,334 dispatch keys, gate assertions, registry rows), verified on every gate run by the ship guards. The per-era census snapshots that used to live here (the 1,417-frontier / 4,717-assertion / 25,126-row figures) were frozen history masquerading as status — killed at v0.413.0 per independent evaluation; era history lives in CHANGELOG and SESSION_LOG where history belongs.
 
 **Single-file scope** (used for per-band deltas): calculator defs, main-registry rows,
 gate assertions, dispatch count — always labeled as such in CHANGELOG/SESSION_LOG entries.
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ Mizuno, Rossi).
 Full framework physics lives in the whitepaper corpus — the physics is the
 whitepapers; the calculator computes what the whitepapers derive.
 
-## What is currently shipped (v0.441.0)
+## What is currently shipped (v0.442.0)
 
 ### Wiring campaign — LIVE (see `CLAUDE.md` charter)
 
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Sequential wiring of all 2,255 whitepapers, starting at PAPER_001.
 Authorized 2026-07-28: autonomous band sessions, ship per session via
 `ship.ps1`, full stop at PAPER_500 for manual review.
 
-**Wired: 2,278 distinct dispatches (2,333 DISPATCH keys incl. the 55 canonical alias numbers 2179-2233)** (one per paper, Rule B closed). **Complete-compile frontier: PAPER_001-1300** (+ b-variants) fully captured over a **1766-function primitive-sourced equation library** — every equation and section (core + Session-225 + Production Framework + Cosmogenesis Lagrangian + VDS/DVP/BSH + Kozima-LENR K.1-K.6) via _common_uqff_blocks, with paper-specific §B DVP prime ladder (gate-guarded), 40/40+ linked-paper mapping, and a campaign-aware XGEO chain.
+**Wired: 2,279 distinct dispatches (2,334 DISPATCH keys incl. the 55 canonical alias numbers 2179-2233)** (one per paper, Rule B closed). **Complete-compile frontier: PAPER_001-1300** (+ b-variants) fully captured over a **1766-function primitive-sourced equation library** — every equation and section (core + Session-225 + Production Framework + Cosmogenesis Lagrangian + VDS/DVP/BSH + Kozima-LENR K.1-K.6) via _common_uqff_blocks, with paper-specific §B DVP prime ladder (gate-guarded), 40/40+ linked-paper mapping, and a campaign-aware XGEO chain.
 
 **Derived-constants catalog (v0.344.0):** all **1,272 unique predecessor-registry derived constants** wired and callable via `uqff_derived_constants.py` — e.g. `derived_constant("alpha_inverse")` → 137.0 (PAPER_1167), `derived_constant("astro_BH_entropy_coeff")` → 0.24833 (PAPER_594). 661 numeric, routes + provenance preserved.
 
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ Authorized 2026-07-28: autonomous band sessions, ship per session via
 
 **Flagship UQFF closed forms now individually callable** (v0.342.0–v0.343.0 predecessor mine): cosmological constant Λ = ρ_SCm·26!·25/12 = 5.957e-10 (Planck), proton mass 938.25 MeV and m_p/m_e = 1836 from integers, H₀ = A_5+SO_5 = 70 EXACT, Ω_Λ = 0.684, Universal Inertial Operator U_i = 2.75e-7 (Sun), Higgs vev 246 GeV, fine-structure α, electron g−2 = 0.001159652, Holmlid 630 eV / Coulomb 626 eV LENR chain, and **all 8 Clay Millennium closures** (Riemann, P≠NP, Yang-Mills=1.736, Poincaré=7/12, Navier-Stokes=0.85, Hodge=1.0, BSD, BH-info).
 
-Registry: **7,137 rows**. Fidelity gate: **6,114 assertions**, green. *(v0.285.0/v0.321.0 burned/yanked on PyPI.)*
+Registry: **7,141 rows**. Fidelity gate: **6,115 assertions**, green. *(v0.285.0/v0.321.0 burned/yanked on PyPI.)*
 
 | Paper | Content | Key result |
 |---|---|---|

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/RULINGS_QUEUE.md

@@ -7737,5 +7737,86 @@ were in the corpus.
   the pre-stated test (another engine run: the same instrument, a second
   fluid); (c) a corpus route from D_BSFG/D_phys to the fluid cutoff, if
   one exists (none searched for yet).
-- **Status:** OPEN (B287, 2026-09-17).
+- **PRE-STATED TEST (Daniel: "PROCEED WITH Q-251 argon test", 2026-09-17;
+  written and committed to the repo BEFORE any run):** liquid argon,
+  Lennard-Jones (sigma 0.3405 nm, epsilon 0.9961 kJ/mol = 119.8 K), at the
+  NIST state point 85 K, 0.101325 MPa: density 1409.6 kg/m^3 (21.25 nm^-3,
+  rho* 0.839, T* 0.710), c_0 = 854.35 m/s, eta = 279.54 uPa s (NIST
+  Chemistry WebBook, isobaric table, read 2026-09-17). PREDICTIONS:
+  (P1, Q-247 as ruled) k_c = omega_SCm / c_0 = 9.19 nm^-1, Gaussian with
+  coefficient 0.344, 1/e at 15.7 nm^-1; (P2, the Q-251 route) k_c =
+  (D_BSFG/D_phys) omega_SCm / c_0 = 13.79 nm^-1, 1/e at 23.5 (water's own
+  measured ratio 1.489 would give 13.69). READING RULE: measured Gaussian k_c
+  within +-10 pct of 9.19 -> P1 holds for argon and Q-251 closes NEGATIVE
+  (water's 1.49 was a coincidence); within +-10 pct of 13.79 -> Q-251 has
+  its second liquid (POSITIVE, still not a derivation); neither -> both
+  NEGATIVE and the ratio k_c/k_c(c_0) is recorded next to water's 1.489.
+  The MODEL's own c_0 is measured in the same run (longitudinal-current
+  dispersion at the lowest k) and k_c(c_0) is restated with it if it differs
+  from NIST by more than 5 pct; eta_0 and D are checked against NIST 0.280
+  mPa s and the LJ literature (D ~ 1.7e-5 cm^2/s). Instrument: the B287
+  engine's LJ path (md_grade/argon_record.py), same FFT currents, same
+  correlator, same Green-Kubo estimator; 4096 atoms, L 5.78 nm (k_min 1.09),
+  k to 26 nm^-1, 4-fs sampling, two seeds. Nothing in this paragraph
+  changes after the run; the result is appended below it.
+- **RESULT (2026-09-17, appended below the pre-statement, which is unchanged):**
+  two seeds, 4,096 LJ atoms, L 5.777 nm (k_min 1.09), 400 ps each, 36 shells
+  to 26 nm^-1, 8-fs sampling. Engine validation: C kernel vs numpy 9e-12
+  kJ/mol; F = -grad E 3e-8; NVE -0.00001 kJ/mol per atom over 10 ps; E/N
+  -5.15 eps; equipartition of the currents 1.00-1.03. Transport vs NIST:
+  eta_0 (plateau k < 3) = 0.2743 / 0.2767 +- 0.005 mPa s vs 0.2795; D =
+  1.81 / 1.80 e-5 cm^2/s vs the LJ literature 1.6-1.8. MEASURED: eta(k) is
+  Gaussian over the water-comparable range k <= 14 nm^-1 (chi2 43 / 46 on 27
+  shells; Lorentzian 94 / 111) with k_c = 7.25 +- 0.06 and 7.09 +- 0.06;
+  POOLED k_c = 7.17 +- 0.05 nm^-1 (1/e at 12.2; the direct 1/e crossing of
+  eta/eta_0 gives 12.4). Over the full range to 26 the tail is SLOWER than
+  Gaussian (chi2 ~1000 for either shape; eta/eta_0 = 0.065 at 26 vs 0.026
+  Gaussian) - the fit range was not pre-specified, so both are reported;
+  the like-for-like number is the k <= 14 one. READING BY THE RULE: k_c /
+  P1 (9.19) = 0.78; k_c / P2 (13.79) = 0.52. NEITHER within +-10 pct.
+  **Q-251 CLOSES NEGATIVE**: water's ratio 1.489 does not recur (argon's is
+  0.78); D_BSFG/D_phys = 1.5 was a coincidence. P1 (k_c = omega_SCm/c_0) is
+  also NEGATIVE for argon at the 10 pct rule (-22 pct), as it was for water
+  (+49 pct). eta/eta_0 at k_c(c_0) = 0.56 vs the predicted 0.709.
+  **OBSERVATION (not pre-stated; recorded, not claimed):** the two liquids'
+  sound speeds differ by 1.73x (1480 vs 854 m/s) but their measured k_c
+  differ by 1.10x (7.90 vs 7.17); in units of the molecular diameter, k_c x
+  sigma = 2.50 (water, sigma_OO 0.3159 nm) and 2.44 (argon, sigma 0.3405 nm)
+  - the roll-off of eta(k) sits at k ~ 2.5/sigma in both, i.e. it tracks
+  the molecular size, not omega_SCm/c_s. That is the generalized-
+  hydrodynamics expectation for eta(k) in simple liquids and it is what the
+  data say; what it implies for the framework's k_c is a NEW question
+  (Q-252, to be opened in the band), not a ruling here. The model's own c_0
+  was NOT cleanly measured (the lowest shell is under-resolved at a 20-ps
+  lag window; the k = 1.5-1.9 shells give the dispersed sound, 1.2-1.3
+  km/s) - P1 was evaluated with NIST's c_0 as pre-stated, and the model
+  reproduces NIST's eta_0 to 1-2 pct and D to the literature.
+- **Status:** CLOSED NEGATIVE (B288, 2026-09-17) - by the pre-stated rule.
+
+### Q-252 — PAPER_2283 / PAPER_2282 / PAPER_2267 / PAPER_2275 — the measured fluid cutoff tracks the molecular diameter, not omega_SCm/c_s: is the sound-cone k_c a different object from the eta(k) cutoff, or is the framework cutoff for fluids falsified as written?
+- **Evidence (B287 + B288):** water (TIP4P/2005, 298 K) k_c = 7.90 +- 0.05
+  nm^-1; argon (LJ, 85 K) k_c = 7.17 +- 0.05. Their sound speeds differ by
+  1.73x (1480 vs 854 m/s), so the framework's k_c = omega_SCm/c_s differs
+  by 1.73x (5.31 vs 9.19); the measured cutoffs differ by 1.10x. In units
+  of the molecular diameter, k_c x sigma = 2.50 (water, sigma_OO 0.3159)
+  and 2.44 (argon, 0.3405). Both Gaussian to 1.7 k_c; both engines
+  reproduce eta_0 and D to 1-5 pct. The ratio measured/k_c(c_0) is 1.49
+  for water and 0.78 for argon - no common factor.
+- **What it is:** the generalized-hydrodynamics expectation for the
+  wavevector-dependent shear viscosity of a simple liquid: non-locality on
+  the molecular scale. It needs no carrier at 1.25 THz to produce.
+- **RULING asked:** (a) the sound-cone k_c of PAPER_2267 (the surviving
+  mode set at omega_SCm/c_s, the object Theorems A and B are built on) is
+  NOT the transfer cutoff eta(k) measures - front 4 as an eta(k) test of
+  omega/c_s was a category error (the program's own, twice re-posed);
+  Theorem B is untouched and remains UNTESTED by fronts 1-4; front 4 is
+  retired or re-posed a third time on an observable that actually reads
+  the mode set; or (b) the framework cutoff for fluids IS the transfer
+  cutoff and is falsified as written for two liquids - the NS arc's
+  distinctive physical claim closes negative and the corpus records it;
+  or (c) something the sweep has not found.
+- **Not claimed:** which reading is right; that 2.5/sigma is a framework
+  number; anything about Theorems A and B beyond their stated
+  independence from the coefficient.
+- **Status:** OPEN (B288, 2026-09-17) - Daniel-gated.
 

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/SESSION_LOG.md

@@ -14470,3 +14470,67 @@ summary; staleness sweep of 2,777 tracked files clean (the two "record run
 OPEN / still to do" live strings of B286 updated to DONE). Ready to ship
 via .\ship.ps1 - one band on v0.440.0, version 0.441.0.
 
+## 2026-09-17 — v0.442.0 prep — B288: THE Q-251 PRE-STATED TEST (argon) - CLOSED NEGATIVE; Q-252 OPENED
+
+Daniel: "PROCEED WITH Q-251 argon test", then "prepare the ship". Tag
+chain verified first: v0.441.0 annotated tag on HEAD; PyPI 0.441.0 wheel
+listing (2,949 entries via the inspector) identical to the rehearsal wheel.
+
+PRE-REGISTRATION FIRST. NIST argon at 85 K / 0.101325 MPa read through the
+browser pane (rho 1409.6 kg/m^3, c_0 854.35 m/s, eta 279.54 uPa s). P1 =
+omega/c_0 = 9.193 nm^-1; P2 = 1.5 x P1 = 13.789; rule +-10 pct; written
+into RULINGS_QUEUE.md Q-251 and committed to Daniel's disk BEFORE the run.
+
+INSTRUMENT. lj_kernel.c (cell list, energy-shifted 12-6, OpenMP);
+argon_record.py (velocity Verlet 4 fs, weak Berendsen, transverse and
+longitudinal currents by one FFT transform per component - currents3 added
+to gridcur - correlator in blocks, MSD, checkpoint/restart); validate_argon:
+kernel vs numpy 9e-13, F = -grad E 6e-9, NVE +1e-5 kJ/mol/atom per 10 ps,
+E/N -5.16 eps, P ~310 bar (truncated-shifted, disclosed). 0.067 s/step
+with sampling.
+
+RUNS: seed 1 and seed 2, 400 ps each (~1.9 h each, held turns). Transport:
+eta_0 0.2743 / 0.2767 vs NIST 0.2795; D 1.81 / 1.80 e-5. RESULT: Gaussian
+to k = 14 (chi2 43 / 46; Lorentzian 94 / 111), k_c 7.25 / 7.09 -> pooled
+7.17 +- 0.05 (direct 1/e 12.4); beyond 14 the tail is slower than Gaussian
+(full-range chi2 ~1100 both shapes) - range not pre-specified, both
+reported. Rule: 0.78 / 0.52 -> NEITHER -> Q-251 CLOSED NEGATIVE; P1
+negative for argon too. The model's c_0 not cleanly measured (k_min
+under-resolved at 20 ps; k 1.5-1.9 give dispersed sound 1.2-1.3 km/s) -
+P1 evaluated with NIST's as pre-stated. The result was appended beneath
+the pre-statement and committed before this band was built.
+
+THE OBSERVATION. k_c x sigma = 2.50 (water) / 2.44 (argon) while c_0
+differs 1.73x: the eta(k) cutoff tracks molecular size, not omega/c_s -
+the generalized-hydrodynamics expectation. Opened as Q-252 (category
+error with Theorem B untested, or fluid cutoff falsified as written) -
+Daniel-gated; no reading preferred. Daniel asked whether the project had
+fallen apart; answered plainly (the NS arc's distinctive claim has failed
+its only sharp tests; fronts 1-2 were non-discriminating; the registry's
+EXACT residuals are internal consistency; the discipline is what made the
+negative clean) and proposed an audit of which corpus claims have ever
+met outside data with a prediction stated first. He said: prepare the ship.
+
+WIRED: q251_prestated_test(), q251_argon_grade(), front4_rulings() Q-251
+CLOSED / Q-252 OPEN, ARGON_/WATER_ constants (external literals, sourced);
+PAPER_2283 dispatch (2,334); proof-set line; registry +4 / 2 edited
+(7,141); GRAPH +5; 9 satellites B288; GAPS b288 + Rule-7 last;
+RULINGS_QUEUE Q-252; INDEX 2283; gate pin B288 (6,115); md_grade +13
+(gridcur.py updated). Version 0.442.0 - one band on v0.441.0.
+VERIFIED: gate 6,115/0 (two catches: the B287 pin still asserted Q-251
+OPEN - now accepts the B288 supersession; the paper lacked the phrase
+"category error" its pin looked for); acceptance 109/109; wheel 2,964
+entries (md_grade x47, no .so / .npz; PAPER_2283 on it; 20/20 py-modules;
+token ABSENT); installed in a clean venv, calc('PAPER_2283') GRADED from the
+wheel's own CSV + summary; staleness sweep of 2,792 tracked files clean.
+Ready to ship via .\ship.ps1 - one band on v0.441.0, version 0.442.0.
+SHIP ATTEMPT 1 RED (Daniel's machine): SHIP GUARD v8 - two files in
+"Claude outputs/" inside the repo (the wheel listing and a PyPI JSON I had
+sent in chat; the desktop app saves chat deliverables into the connected
+folder) were untracked and not on the manifest. My rehearsal tree had no
+such folder, so the gate passed here and not there - the seam again. FIX:
+.gitignore "Claude outputs/" (chat deliverables are not repo content);
+reproduced the red locally by creating the folder, re-ran the gate green
+with it present. LESSON: rehearse the gate against the connected folder's
+untracked contents, not only the cloud tree.
+

star_magic_program-0.442.0/SHIP_MESSAGE.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+v0.442.0 — Q-251 PRE-STATED TEST SHIP
+
+B288 (PAPER_2283): the first fully pre-registered test in the corpus, a
+second liquid, and neither prediction survived. One band since v0.441.0.
+
+- THE PRE-STATEMENT: written into RULINGS_QUEUE.md Q-251 and committed to
+  the repository before any run. Lennard-Jones argon at the NIST 85 K /
+  0.101325 MPa state point (c_0 854.35 m/s, eta 0.2795 mPa s, read from
+  the WebBook). P1, the Q-247 form: k_c = omega_SCm/c_0 = 9.19 nm^-1. P2,
+  the Q-251 route: (D_BSFG/D_phys) x P1 = 13.79. Rule: +-10 pct. The
+  result is appended beneath the pre-statement, which is unchanged.
+- THE INSTRUMENT: the B287 engine's LJ path (md_grade/lj_kernel.c,
+  argon_record.py, gridcur.currents3). Kernel exact against numpy; forces
+  = -grad E to 6e-9; NVE +0.00001 kJ/mol per atom over 10 ps. The model
+  reproduces NIST: eta_0 0.274 / 0.277 vs 0.2795; D 1.8e-5.
+- THE MEASUREMENT: 4096 atoms, 2 seeds x 400 ps, 36 shells to 26 nm^-1.
+  eta(k) Gaussian over the water-comparable range (chi2 43/46 vs
+  Lorentzian 94/111): k_c = 7.25 / 7.09 -> 7.17 +- 0.05 nm^-1.
+- THE RULE APPLIED: k_c/P1 = 0.78; k_c/P2 = 0.52. NEITHER. Q-251 CLOSED
+  NEGATIVE - water's 1.489 was a coincidence. P1, already negative for
+  water (+49 pct), is negative for argon (-22 pct).
+- THE OBSERVATION (recorded, not claimed): sound speeds differ 1.73x, the
+  cutoffs 1.10x; k_c x sigma = 2.50 (water) and 2.44 (argon). The eta(k)
+  cutoff tracks the molecular diameter, not omega_SCm/c_s. Q-252 OPENED,
+  Daniel-gated: a category error (Theorem B untested by front 4), or the
+  framework fluid cutoff falsified as written.
+
+Not claimed: which reading of Q-252; the model's own c_0 (not cleanly
+measured; P1 evaluated with NIST's as pre-stated); the fit range (not
+pre-specified; both reported; neither rescues a prediction); anything
+beyond two liquids at one state point each.
+
+Gate 6,115/0. Dispatch 2,334 keys. Registry 7,141 rows. Acceptance
+109/109 (simulator untouched).

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/UNIFIED_REGISTRY.csv

@@ -7118,7 +7118,7 @@ ns_functional_spine_closed,B279 audit of the predecessor S300 argument,supersess
 s300_spine_audit,Star-Magic predecessor S300 (Rule E read-only),audit,PAPER_2274 sec 3,"S1 correct; S2 correct and DERIVED (B271); S3 FALSE (dimensional + H^1-not-in-L^inf, divergence-free family grad(r^(1-alpha)) x e_z at alpha=2/5: E_2-integral 5, E-integral 5/11, sup unbounded); S4 small-data only; S5 does not follow; predecessor session-259 audit already ASSERTION_ONLY; Lean placeholder",theory rows OPEN = 0,,,,,PAPER_2274,,,,,,AUDITED_2026-09-12
 theorem_b_continuum,B280 Theorem B (PAPER_2275) - continuum UQFF fluid with phonon-mollified transport,theorem,Leray 1934 on d_t u + (rho_eps*u . grad) u + grad p = nu Lap u; eps from Forms A+B+C composed,||grad u_eps||_inf <= ||grad rho_eps||_2 ||u_0||_2 = C eps^{-5/2} ||u_0||_2 = M_eps (CONSTANT); Gronwall ||grad u(t)||_2^2 <= ||grad u_0||_2^2 exp(2 M_eps t); local H^1 well-posedness -> global unique C^inf; C^2 = 3/(16 pi^{3/2}) EXACT,global regularity (all modes; no truncation; no ruling),,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2275,PAPER_2267 (Theorem A = sharp-filter limit); PAPER_2268 (M_eps diverges as eps -> 0 = the domain boundary),uqff_ns_assembly.theorem_b,,,PAPER_2275;PAPER_2267;PAPER_2268;PAPER_1042;PAPER_2269;PAPER_102;PAPER_106,WIRED
 phonon_mollifier_width_eps,B280 PAPER_2275 sec 2 - the three phonon forms composed,derived,eps = sqrt(2 beta_i [SSq]) / k_c with k_c = 2 pi f_c / c_s (c_s = 1480 m/s: external literal at PAPER_2267 L53; provenance corrected B287),"m(k) = H_SCm(k_c - k) x q^{(k/k_c)^2}, q = exp(-beta_i [SSq]) = 0.7092 -> Gaussian tail exp(-eps^2 k^2/2); eps = 0.8290/k_c = 0.1319 lambda_c",0.156 nm (water; lambda_c = 1.184 nm),,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2275,m(k_c) 0.709 / m(2k_c) 0.253 / m(3k_c) 0.045 / m(5k_c) 1.9e-4; 1/e at 1.71 k_c; FLAGGED identification n = k/k_c (PAPER_205 exponential variant -> 0.004 nm); Q-246 RULED 2026-09-17 option (b): the PAPER_1042 Gaussian tail is THE high-k form (record run: Gaussian chi2 33 vs Lorentzian 192; PAPER_2282); the n = k/k_c identification stays flagged; the fluid-side scale ratio 1.489 (Q-251) bears on the number 0.156 nm if eta(k) is the mollifier width - NOT claimed,uqff_ns_assembly.theorem_b,,,PAPER_2275;PAPER_1042;PAPER_1203;PAPER_1154;PAPER_205;PAPER_2261;PAPER_2282,WIRED_FLAGGED (Gaussian form RULED; n = k/k_c flagged)
-ns_proof_set_closeout,B281 PAPER_2276 - the closing index of the NS proof set,index,ledger B267-B281 + Theorem A + Theorem B + cap + ruling + audit,15 rungs live-mirrored; theory rows OPEN = 0; four fronts OPEN each with falsifier + instrument + access route (JHTDB full token / Kerr fields; channel tails; ATR THz-TDS; MD current spectra + IXS/INS); rulings Q-246 + Q-247 + Q-250 RULED 2026-09-17 (B287); Q-251 OPEN,THEORY_CLOSED (fronts OPEN),,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2276,PAPER_2270 (superseded as entry point); PAPER_2267; PAPER_2275; PAPER_2274,uqff_ns_assembly.proof_set_closeout,,,PAPER_2276;PAPER_2263;PAPER_2264;PAPER_2265;PAPER_2266;PAPER_2267;PAPER_2268;PAPER_2269;PAPER_2270;PAPER_2271;PAPER_2272;PAPER_2273;PAPER_2274;PAPER_2275,WIRED
+ns_proof_set_closeout,B281 PAPER_2276 - the closing index of the NS proof set,index,ledger B267-B281 + Theorem A + Theorem B + cap + ruling + audit,15 rungs live-mirrored; theory rows OPEN = 0; four fronts OPEN each with falsifier + instrument + access route (JHTDB full token / Kerr fields; channel tails; ATR THz-TDS; MD current spectra + IXS/INS); rulings Q-246 + Q-247 + Q-250 RULED 2026-09-17 (B287); Q-251 CLOSED NEGATIVE by pre-stated test (B288); Q-252 OPEN,THEORY_CLOSED (fronts OPEN),,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2276,PAPER_2270 (superseded as entry point); PAPER_2267; PAPER_2275; PAPER_2274,uqff_ns_assembly.proof_set_closeout,,,PAPER_2276;PAPER_2263;PAPER_2264;PAPER_2265;PAPER_2266;PAPER_2267;PAPER_2268;PAPER_2269;PAPER_2270;PAPER_2271;PAPER_2272;PAPER_2273;PAPER_2274;PAPER_2275,WIRED
 sound_cone_speed_at_omega_scm,B281 PAPER_2276 sec 5 / 6.4 - Q-247,flag,k_c = omega_SCm / c_s: c_0 = 1480 m/s (EXTERNAL literal at PAPER_2267 L53 - fresh water ~20 C; PAPER_2261 carries seawater as a DENSITY landmark only) vs c_inf = 3200 m/s (IXS fast sound - Sette 1995 PRL 75:850 - Q = 4-14 nm^-1),c_inf/c_0 = 2.162; lambda_c 1.184 -> 2.560 nm; k_c 5.307 -> 2.454 nm^-1; eps 0.156 -> 0.338 nm; mode count and eps rescale; Theorems A and B unchanged,c_0 RULED 2026-09-17 (Q-247): k_c = 5.307 nm^-1 stands; c_inf REJECTED,,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2276,"RECORD RUN (B287 PAPER_2282): measured k_c 7.90 +- 0.05 nm^-1 in 4 runs / 2 boxes / 3 seeds -> c_0 x 1.489 (recorded as a measured fact), c_inf x 3.22 EXCLUDED; provenance of the 1480 literal corrected (was ""PAPER_2261 anchor"")",uqff_ns_assembly.proof_set_closeout,,,PAPER_2276;PAPER_2261;PAPER_2267;PAPER_2275;PAPER_2282,RULED_2026-09-17_c0
 deep_tail_stage1_cap_grade,B282 PAPER_2277 - the deep tail sample (personal JHTDB token; stage 1 of the kill test),data_grade,1182-form ratio per 25k chunk + octave efficiency eff(oct) = sum(w.S.w)/(sum|w|^2 sqrt(w2_oct)) on 1e6 gradient tensors,"isotropic8192 t=1 seed 40: 500k pts, max/mean 333, aggregate 0.010882, chunks 0.0123-0.0200; isotropic32768 t=1 seed 50: 500k pts, max/mean 1052, aggregate 0.006552, chunks 0.0047-0.0187; eff 0.118 -> 0.062/0.070 -> 0.033/0.049 at mean/16x/64x; max load-bearing eff 0.312",CAP HOLDS (worst chunk 0.0200 vs 17/20),,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2277,PAPER_2271;PAPER_2272;PAPER_2273 (the sampled grades this deepens 1000x); PAPER_2276 sec 6.1 (the front),uqff_ns_assembly.deep_tail_grade,,,PAPER_2277;PAPER_1182;PAPER_2264;PAPER_2265;PAPER_2266;PAPER_2276,GRADED_2026-09-13
 octave_stretching_efficiency_trend,B282 PAPER_2277 sec 3.2,finding,eff(oct) on load-bearing octaves (>= 20 cells; >= 1/64 mean); power-law fit over octaves 2-8,eff ~ |w|^-0.66 (isotropic8192) and |w|^-0.56 (isotropic32768): the tail stretches LESS per unit of its own vorticity; the most intense cell (1052x mean) has w.S.w < 0 (local -0.026); B278 envelope flag retired at 25k-sample depth (8192 0.0200 vs 32768 0.0187 - no Re trend),falls with intensity (away from the cap),,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2277,not the cap (global; |w|^2-weighted) - a sharper diagnostic; trivial divergence below 1/64 mean disclosed and excluded,uqff_ns_assembly.deep_tail_grade,,,PAPER_2277;PAPER_2273;PAPER_2264,FINDING_2026-09-13
@@ -7135,4 +7135,8 @@ front4_record_run,"B287 PAPER_2282 - the front-4 record run: SPME engine, 4 runs
 front4_record_grade,"B287 PAPER_2282 - the record-run harness (pure arithmetic, both boxes, both currents)",data_grade,"md_grade/front4_record_eta_k.csv + front4_record_summary.json -> weighted log-linear Gaussian and Lorentzian fits per box, k_c with error, candidate readings, eta/eta_0 at k_c(c_0), shear-wave onset from the summary, the falsifier of PAPER_2281 sec 4 applied","B: k_c 7.89 +- 0.05, chi2 34/197; C: 7.92 +- 0.10, chi2 71/108; record k_c 7.92; ratio to c_0 1.492; ratio to D_BSFG/D_phys 0.995","FRONT 4 CLOSED NEGATIVE ON THE COEFFICIENT (1/e at 13.5 vs 9.05 / 4.19), POSITIVE ON EXISTENCE AND SHAPE (Gaussian, sound-cone scale, c_inf excluded)",,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2282,reproduces the scipy fits of rec_analyze/rec_pool (7.90/7.93) with no scipy in the gate; NO DATA -> AWAITING_DATA,uqff_ns_assembly.front4_record_grade,,,PAPER_2282;PAPER_2281,GRADED_2026-09-17
 shear_wave_onset_water,"B287 PAPER_2282 sec 4.3 - the transverse dispersion onset (Q-250 reading (b), reported alongside)",data_finding,"first k at which the normalized C_T(k,t) develops a negative lobe (propagating shear waves), 6.21 nm box","k = 1.011: C_min -0.030 +- 0.028 (diffusive); k = 1.430: -0.094 +- 0.018 (5 sigma, propagating); k = 1.751: -0.167 +- 0.011",k_T = 1.0-1.4 nm^-1 - BELOW k_c(c_inf) = 2.45 and 4-5x below k_c(c_0) = 5.31: reading (b) would fail front 4 for both candidates,,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2282,a bracket from two shells (3 and 6 vectors); a finer bracket needs a larger box,uqff_ns_assembly.front4_record_grade,,,PAPER_2282;PAPER_2281;PAPER_2276,FINDING_2026-09-17
 front4_rulings_2026_09_17,B287 PAPER_2282 sec 6 - Q-247 / Q-250 / Q-246 RULED on RULINGS_BRIEF_Q246_Q247_Q250.md,ruling,"Daniel: ""proceed with the next two parts as identified"" over the brief recommendation table","Q-247: c_0 stands, c_inf rejected, residual 1.489 recorded, provenance of 1480 corrected; Q-250: eta(k) on the centre-of-mass current canonical, atomic and k_T reported alongside; Q-246: option (b) the PAPER_1042 Gaussian tail canonized, n = k/k_c stays flagged",RULED 2026-09-17,,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2282,each ruling carries its evidence line (front4_rulings()),uqff_ns_assembly.front4_rulings,,,PAPER_2282;PAPER_2281;PAPER_2276;PAPER_2275;PAPER_2267;PAPER_2261;PAPER_1042;PAPER_106,RULED_2026-09-17
-fluid_cutoff_scale_ratio_q251,B287 PAPER_2282 sec 6 - Q-251 OPENED: k_c(measured)/k_c(c_0) vs D_BSFG/D_phys,flag,k_c(measured)/k_c(c_0) = 7.90/5.307; D_BSFG/D_phys = 6/4,1.489 +- 0.010 (fit) / +- 0.004 (seeds) vs 1.5 (ratio 0.995); a route would read k_c(fluid) = (D_BSFG/D_phys) omega_SCm/c_0 = 7.96 nm^-1,"OBSERVATION ONLY - post-hoc, one liquid, one temperature; pre-stated test needs a second liquid or a temperature series",,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2282,NOT claimed: that the ratio is 1.5; that the corpus derives it; the coefficient 0.344 at 7.96,uqff_ns_assembly.front4_rulings,,,PAPER_2282;PAPER_1521;PAPER_2275,OPEN_RULING
+fluid_cutoff_scale_ratio_q251,B287 PAPER_2282 sec 6 - Q-251 OPENED: k_c(measured)/k_c(c_0) vs D_BSFG/D_phys,flag,k_c(measured)/k_c(c_0) = 7.90/5.307; D_BSFG/D_phys = 6/4,"1.489 +- 0.010 (water) vs 1.5 (ratio 0.995); PRE-STATED TEST on argon (B288): P1 9.19 / P2 13.79 written before the run, measured k_c 7.17 +- 0.05 -> ratio 0.78 / 0.52, NEITHER within 10 pct",CLOSED NEGATIVE 2026-09-17 by the pre-stated rule: the 1.5 does not recur; water 1.489 was a coincidence,,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2282,"the observation was labelled post-hoc and tested with the prediction committed first (PAPER_2283 sec 1); the ratio for argon, 0.78, is recorded next to water 1.489",uqff_ns_assembly.front4_rulings,,,PAPER_2282;PAPER_1521;PAPER_2275;PAPER_2283,CLOSED_NEGATIVE_2026-09-17
+q251_argon_prestated_test,"B288 PAPER_2283 sec 1 - the two predictions and the reading rule, committed to the repo before the run",specification,P1 k_c = omega_SCm/c_0(NIST 854.35 m/s); P2 = (D_BSFG/D_phys) x P1; coefficient beta_i [SSq]; rule +-10 pct,P1 9.193 nm^-1 (1/e 15.68); P2 13.789 (1/e 23.52); water ratio recorded 1.489,"PRE-STATED 2026-09-17 (RULINGS_QUEUE.md Q-251, unchanged after the run)",,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2283,"external literals: sigma 0.3405 nm, eps 0.9961 kJ/mol; NIST 85 K / 0.101325 MPa: rho 1409.6 kg/m^3, c_0 854.35 m/s, eta 279.54 uPa s (read 2026-09-17)",uqff_ns_assembly.q251_prestated_test,,,PAPER_2283;PAPER_2282;PAPER_1521;PAPER_2267,SPECIFIED
+q251_argon_eta_k,"B288 PAPER_2283 sec 4 - the measured eta(k) of LJ argon (2 seeds x 400 ps, 4096 atoms, 36 shells to 26 nm^-1)",data_finding,"Green-Kubo eta(k) = rho/(k^2 int_0^10ps C_T dt), weighted Gaussian fit over k <= 14 (the water-comparable range) and the full range; direct 1/e crossing",k_c 7.25 +- 0.06 / 7.09 +- 0.06 -> pooled 7.17 +- 0.05 nm^-1 (harness 7.16); Gaussian chi2 43/46 vs Lorentzian 94/111 (n=27); full-range Gaussian 7.96 with chi2 ~1100 (tail slower than Gaussian beyond k ~ 14); eta_0 plateau 0.2743 / 0.2767 +- 0.005 vs NIST 0.2795; D 1.81 / 1.80 e-5,"k_c = 7.17 +- 0.05 nm^-1; ratio to P1 0.78, to P2 0.52",,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2283,"engine: kernel vs numpy 9e-13; F = -grad E 6e-9; NVE 1e-5 kJ/mol/atom per 10 ps; E/N -5.16 eps; truncated-shifted at 2.5 sigma, ~310 bar; model c_0 not cleanly measured (P1 evaluated with NIST c_0 as pre-stated); fit range not pre-specified (both reported)",uqff_ns_assembly.q251_argon_grade,,,PAPER_2283;PAPER_2282,FINDING_2026-09-17
+q251_argon_grade,B288 PAPER_2283 sec 5 - the pre-stated rule applied (pure arithmetic harness),data_grade,"md_grade/q251_argon_eta_k.csv + q251_argon_summary.json -> weighted log-linear Gaussian fits (k <= 14; full), plateau eta_0, direct 1/e, ratios to P1/P2, k_c x sigma","k_c 7.16 +- 0.05; ratio_P1 0.779; ratio_P2 0.519; eta/eta_0 at P1 0.57, at P2 0.28 (predicted 0.709)",NEITHER within +-10 pct -> Q-251 CLOSED NEGATIVE; P1 (omega/c_0) NEGATIVE for argon (-22 pct) as for water (+49 pct),,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2283,reproduces the scipy fit (7.17) with no scipy in the gate; NO DATA -> AWAITING_DATA,uqff_ns_assembly.q251_argon_grade,,,PAPER_2283,GRADED_2026-09-17
+eta_k_cutoff_tracks_molecular_diameter,"B288 PAPER_2283 sec 6 - two liquids: the eta(k) cutoff in units of the molecular diameter (recorded, NOT claimed)",observation,k_c x sigma with sigma = 0.3159 nm (TIP4P/2005 O-O) and 0.3405 nm (LJ argon),"water 7.90 x 0.3159 = 2.50; argon 7.17 x 0.3405 = 2.44; c_0 ratio 1.73, k_c ratio 1.10","the cutoff of eta(k) sits at k ~ 2.5/sigma in both liquids - it tracks molecular size, not omega_SCm/c_s (the generalized-hydrodynamics expectation) -> Q-252 OPENED",,0.0,fluid,,PAPER_2283,"post-hoc across two liquids; the choice of ""diameter"" for water moves 2.50 by a few pct; NOT a framework number; which reading of Q-252 is right is Daniel-gated",uqff_ns_assembly.q251_argon_grade,,,PAPER_2283;PAPER_2282;PAPER_2267;PAPER_2275,OPEN_RULING

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/UNIFIED_REGISTRY_CORPUS_CITATIONS.csv

@@ -7198,3 +7198,4 @@ PAPER_2279,PAPER_1182;PAPER_2264;PAPER_2270;PAPER_2272;PAPER_2276;PAPER_2277;PAP
 PAPER_2280,PAPER_1182;PAPER_2264;PAPER_2270;PAPER_2272;PAPER_2273;PAPER_2276;PAPER_2277;PAPER_2278;PAPER_2279
 PAPER_2281,PAPER_1042;PAPER_2261;PAPER_2267;PAPER_2270;PAPER_2275;PAPER_2276
 PAPER_2282,PAPER_106;PAPER_1042;PAPER_1521;PAPER_2261;PAPER_2264;PAPER_2267;PAPER_2270;PAPER_2275;PAPER_2276;PAPER_2281
+PAPER_2283,PAPER_1521;PAPER_2264;PAPER_2267;PAPER_2270;PAPER_2275;PAPER_2276;PAPER_2281;PAPER_2282

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/UNIFIED_REGISTRY_DUPLICATES.csv

@@ -194,3 +194,4 @@ NSPROOFSET_ARC_b284_record,BAND_RECORD,"v0.439.0 B284: REUSES the 1182 form and
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_b285_record,BAND_RECORD,"v0.439.0 B285: REUSES the B284 protocol unchanged (one parameter: Re_tau); the only new construct is the wall-unit side-by-side comparison; extends B284, not a duplicate"
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_b286_record,BAND_RECORD,"v0.440.0 B286: no duplicate content - the front-4 test statement of PAPER_2276 sec 6.4 is superseded in place (the paper keeps the original with a dated pointer); the prediction reuses Theorem B's m(k) unchanged; the only new constructs are the eta(k) identification and the a = 0.344/k_c^2 reading"
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_b287_record,BAND_RECORD,v0.441.0 B287: no duplicate content - front4_record_run supersedes front4_measured_roll_off IN PRECISION only (the B286b row stays as the first measurement with its caveats); the prediction and the candidates are unchanged from PAPER_2281; the rulings rows point at the brief they were ruled on
+NSPROOFSET_ARC_b288_record,BAND_RECORD,"v0.442.0 B288: no duplicate content - the argon table is a second liquid, not a re-measurement; the pre-statement lives once (RULINGS_QUEUE.md Q-251) and is quoted verbatim in PAPER_2283 sec 1; the k_c x sigma row is an observation and points at Q-252, it does not restate a claim"

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/UNIFIED_REGISTRY_GAPS.csv

@@ -281,4 +281,5 @@ NSPROOFSET_ARC_b285_open_items,BAND_TRAIL,"v0.439.0 B285: channel5200 DONE (Re_t
 product_arc_rule7_nsproofset_front2,BAND_TRAIL,"Rule 7 this arc (v0.439.0, B284+B285): front 2 is reported as a CONSISTENCY PASS on both branches and NOT a discrimination - the in-medium branch holds only in the weak sense that the data sit 20x under it and the vacuum branch would hold on the same data; the near-wall 1182 ratio is depressed by the mean shear in its denominator, so the y+-banded and local-max readings are given rather than one global number; stage 1 is interpolated (fd4lag4) and stage 2 on-grid (fd4noint); only t = 1.0 was queried on channel5200 (t = 0 / 0.01 return HTTP 500); the y+ 150-300 band at Re_tau 5186 rests on 2,888 points; the one-percent envelope agreement is two single slabs while the Reynolds-invariance claim rests on the eight-band profile and positive fraction"
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_b286_open_items,BAND_TRAIL,"v0.440.0 B286: front 4 RE-SPECIFIED (PAPER_2276 sec 6.4 test was C_T(k;0) = N k_B T/m - flat by identity); eta(k) prediction a = 0.0122 nm^2 (c_0) / 0.0570 nm^2 (c_inf) stated; then MEASURED the same day with the program own numpy TIP4P/2005 MD (md_grade/md_engine.py; 512 molecules, 240 ps): measured k_c 7.8 nm^-1 - c_0 scale (factor 1.47), c_inf EXCLUDED (3.2x), 0.344 coefficient NOT confirmed, shape undecided; harness GRADED. OPEN: the record run (8 nm, 1-2 ns, PME, several seeds) - one run one box one seed so far; Q-250 (canonical observable); Q-246/Q-247/Track 3; front 3 (bench); front 1 whole field"
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_b287_open_items,BAND_TRAIL,"v0.441.0 B287: front 4 RECORD RUN DONE (PAPER_2282): SPME engine validated; k_c 7.90 +- 0.05 nm^-1 in 4 runs / 2 boxes / 3 seeds; Gaussian; c_0 x 1.49; c_inf EXCLUDED; shear-wave onset 1.0-1.4 nm^-1; falsifier of PAPER_2281 sec 4 applied: NEGATIVE on the 0.344 coefficient at k_c = omega/c_0, POSITIVE on existence and shape. RULED: Q-247 (c_0), Q-250 (eta(k) COM), Q-246 (Gaussian). OPEN: Q-251 (1.489 vs D_BSFG/D_phys 1.5 - needs a second liquid or a temperature series); the 8 nm / 1 ns plateau below k = 1.0 (not run - workspace suspends between turns); a finer shear-wave bracket; Track 3 unchanged; front 3 (bench); front 1 whole field"
-product_arc_rule7_nsproofset_front4,BAND_TRAIL,"Rule 7 this arc (v0.441.0, B287): the front-4 prediction as written - exp(-0.344 (k/k_c)^2) with k_c = omega_SCm/c_0 - is NEGATIVE for TIP4P/2005 water at 298 K by the falsifier the program itself stated before measuring (1/e at 13.5 nm^-1 vs 9.05); this is recorded as a failed prediction, not reinterpreted; what survives (existence, Gaussian shape, sound-cone scale, c_inf excluded) is stated separately and no more strongly than the data allow; the 8 nm / 1 ns spec of PAPER_2281 was not run and the reason is on record; Q-251 is a post-hoc one-parameter observation and is labelled as such; TIP4P/2005 is a model, and its own 2-5 pct transport errors bound what ""water"" means here; the atomic-vs-COM choice (1.5 pct) was ruled, not hidden"
+NSPROOFSET_ARC_b288_open_items,BAND_TRAIL,"v0.442.0 B288: Q-251 PRE-STATED TEST DONE (PAPER_2283): LJ argon at NIST 85 K, P1 9.19 / P2 13.79 committed before the run, measured k_c 7.17 +- 0.05 -> NEITHER, Q-251 CLOSED NEGATIVE; P1 negative for argon (-22 pct) as for water (+49 pct); k_c x sigma = 2.50 / 2.44. OPEN: Q-252 (is the sound-cone k_c the eta(k) cutoff? (a) category error / Theorem B untested, (b) framework fluid cutoff falsified as written, (c) other - Daniel-gated; NOTHING further on front 4 until it is ruled); the model c_0 of argon (a longer lag window at k_min); a third liquid or a temperature series only if Q-252 (a) re-poses the front; Track 3 unchanged; front 3 bench; front 1 whole field"
+product_arc_rule7_nsproofset_front4,BAND_TRAIL,"Rule 7 this arc (v0.442.0, B288): the test was pre-registered in the repository with its reading rule and the result appended beneath it unchanged; both predictions failed and are recorded as failed; the fit range was not pre-specified and both ranges are reported (neither rescues a prediction); the model c_0 was not cleanly measured and P1 was evaluated with NIST c_0 as pre-stated; the two-liquid observation (k_c ~ 2.5/sigma) is the generalized-hydrodynamics expectation and is recorded as bearing AGAINST the framework cutoff for this observable, opened as Q-252 rather than absorbed; no reading of Q-252 is preferred by the program; the NS arc distinctive physical claim has now failed its only sharp tests (water, argon) and the corpus says so in the proof-set line, the registry and this row"

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/UNIFIED_REGISTRY_GRAPH.csv

@@ -12426,3 +12426,8 @@ shear_wave_onset_water,PAPER_2282,RULES,Q-250,B287: k_T 1.0-1.4 below both candi
 front4_record_run,PAPER_2282,RULES,Q-246,B287: Gaussian chi2 33 vs 192 -> PAPER_1042 Gaussian tail RULED canonical
 fluid_cutoff_scale_ratio_q251,PAPER_2282,OPENS,Q-251,"B287: 1.489 +- 0.010 vs D_BSFG/D_phys = 1.5 - observation, not claimed"
 primitive,D_BSFG,observable,fluid_cutoff_scale_ratio_q251,D_BSFG/D_phys = 1.5 (Q-251 comparison only)
+md_grade/q251_argon_eta_k.csv,PAPER_2283,GRADES,q251_argon_grade,B288: LJ argon 2 seeds x 400 ps (lj_kernel.c + argon_record.py) -> 36-shell eta(k) -> harness GRADED against the pre-stated P1/P2
+q251_argon_prestated_test,PAPER_2283,PRE_REGISTERS,q251_argon_grade,B288: predictions and rule committed before the run (RULINGS_QUEUE.md Q-251)
+q251_argon_grade,PAPER_2283,CLOSES,Q-251,B288: NEITHER within 10 pct -> Q-251 CLOSED NEGATIVE; water 1.489 was a coincidence
+eta_k_cutoff_tracks_molecular_diameter,PAPER_2283,OPENS,Q-252,"B288: k_c x sigma = 2.50 / 2.44 in water / argon - the cutoff tracks sigma, not omega_SCm/c_s"
+front4_record_run,PAPER_2282,COMPARED_WITH,q251_argon_eta_k,B288: water k_c 7.90 vs argon 7.17 (ratio 1.10) against a c_0 ratio of 1.73

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/UNIFIED_REGISTRY_MERGED.csv

@@ -702,3 +702,4 @@ NSPROOFSET_ARC_B284,1,B284 + PAPER_2279,v0.439.0,front 2 merged - the pair-cap d
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_B285,1,B285 + PAPER_2280,v0.439.0,channel5200 rung merged - the in-medium Reynolds ladder is two rungs and flat; branch holds; discrimination out of reach
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_B286,1,B286 + PAPER_2281,v0.440.0,front 4 re-specified - the equipartition identity named; eta(k) stated as the observable with the prediction a = 0.344/k_c^2; instrument on the wheel; harness awaiting data
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_B287,1,B287 + PAPER_2282,v0.441.0,front 4 record run - SPME engine; k_c 7.90 +- 0.05 Gaussian in 4 runs; c_inf excluded; shear-wave onset 1.0-1.4; falsifier applied NEGATIVE on the coefficient; Q-247/Q-250/Q-246 ruled; Q-251 opened
+NSPROOFSET_ARC_B288,1,B288 + PAPER_2283,v0.442.0,"Q-251 pre-stated argon test - k_c 7.17 +- 0.05 vs P1 9.19 / P2 13.79: NEITHER, CLOSED NEGATIVE; k_c x sigma 2.50 / 2.44 -> Q-252 opened"

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/UNIFIED_REGISTRY_R1_QUEUE.csv

@@ -197,3 +197,4 @@ NSPROOFSET_ARC_B284,band v0.439.0,DATA_GRADED,B284 (front 2; the pair-cap discri
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_B285,band v0.439.0,DATA_GRADED,B285 (channel5200; the in-medium Reynolds rung; no trend),no,front 2 exhausts the public DNS record - next move is Daniel-owned (regime, not resolution)
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_B286,band v0.440.0,RULING_REQUESTED,B286 (front 4 re-specified; Q-250 which observable canonizes transfer above k_c),yes,Q-250 - eta(k) from the TCAF proposed; Daniel decides; the MD run also awaits a wheel or his machine
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_B287,band v0.441.0,RULED,B287 (the record run; Q-247/Q-250/Q-246 ruled on RULINGS_BRIEF_Q246_Q247_Q250.md; Q-251 opened),"no (Q-251: yes, later)","Daniel 2026-09-17: proceed with the next two parts as identified -> Q-247 c_0, Q-250 eta(k) COM, Q-246 Gaussian (b); Q-251 OPEN"
+NSPROOFSET_ARC_B288,band v0.442.0,RULING_REQUESTED,B288 (Q-251 pre-stated argon test CLOSED NEGATIVE; Q-252 opened: is the sound-cone k_c the eta(k) cutoff?),yes,"Q-252 - (a) different object, front 4 a category error, Theorem B untested; (b) framework fluid cutoff falsified as written; (c) other. Daniel decides"

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/UNIFIED_REGISTRY_R2_MAPPING.csv

@@ -319,3 +319,4 @@ NSPROOFSET_ARC_B284_v0.439.0,4,Daniel -> proceed with front 2; token -> channel
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_B285_v0.439.0,4,Daniel -> proceed with channel5200; token -> Re_tau 5186 near-wall sample; service -> fd4lag4 + fd4noint slabs; analysis -> wall-unit comparison with B284 + local-max envelope ratio
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_B286_v0.440.0,4,Daniel -> proceed with recommendations (front 4); analysis -> the literal test is an equipartition identity; observable -> eta(k) via TCAF (gmx tcaf convention); prediction -> a = 0.344/k_c^2 both candidates; instrument -> md_grade/front4_tcaf.py
 NSPROOFSET_ARC_B287_v0.441.0,5,"Daniel -> proceed with 1 & 2 (record run + rulings), then proceed with the next two parts; engine -> md_pme (SPME, C kernels, FFT currents) validated on a 7-step ladder; runs -> 4.04 nm x 3 seeds x 300 ps + 6.21 nm x 200 ps; result -> k_c 7.90 +- 0.05 Gaussian, c_0 x 1.49, c_inf excluded, k_T 1.0-1.4; rulings -> Q-247 c_0 / Q-250 eta(k) COM / Q-246 Gaussian; Q-251 opened (1.489 vs 1.5)"
+NSPROOFSET_ARC_B288_v0.442.0,4,"Daniel -> PROCEED WITH Q-251 argon test; pre-statement -> P1 9.19 / P2 13.79 committed before the run; measurement -> k_c 7.17 +- 0.05 (2 seeds), eta_0 and D match NIST; verdict -> NEITHER, Q-251 CLOSED NEGATIVE; observation -> k_c x sigma 2.50 / 2.44 -> Q-252 opened"

{star_magic_program-0.441.0 → star_magic_program-0.442.0}/UNIFIED_REGISTRY_R3_LEDGER.csv

@@ -288,3 +288,4 @@ band,NSPROOFSET_ARC_B284,PREP v0.439.0,the pair-cap discrimination taken to the
 band,NSPROOFSET_ARC_B285,PREP v0.439.0,the in-medium Reynolds ladder - two rungs by the same protocol in the same wall units and no trend toward either cap; the wall-side twin of the isotropic ladder
 band,NSPROOFSET_ARC_B286,PREP v0.440.0,front 4 caught mis-specified before a single CPU-hour was spent - the test as written was the equipartition theorem; re-posed on the wavevector-dependent shear viscosity with a number a stock tool prints
 band,NSPROOFSET_ARC_B287,PREP v0.441.0,"front 4 record run: a PME engine written and validated for it; the same k_c four times with error bars; the pre-stated falsifier applied - NEGATIVE on the coefficient, POSITIVE on existence and Gaussian shape; three rulings folded on the evidence, one opened"
+band,NSPROOFSET_ARC_B288,PREP v0.442.0,"the first fully pre-registered test in the corpus: two predictions committed before the run, the rule fixed, the result appended beneath - negative for both; the two-liquid comparison shows the eta(k) cutoff tracks molecular size, opened as Q-252 against the framework itself"