ravex 0.0.2__tar.gz
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- ravex-0.0.2/LICENSE +201 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/NOTICE +7 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/PKG-INFO +253 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/README.md +224 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/pyproject.toml +60 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/__init__.py +142 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/_backends.py +458 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/_bootstrap.py +221 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/_cli.py +117 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/_config.py +392 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/_distributed.py +393 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/_frameworks.py +85 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/_patches.py +387 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/_registry.py +791 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/_resume.py +121 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/_runtime.py +483 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/_sampler.py +305 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex/py.typed +0 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex.egg-info/PKG-INFO +253 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex.egg-info/SOURCES.txt +31 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex.egg-info/dependency_links.txt +1 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex.egg-info/entry_points.txt +2 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex.egg-info/requires.txt +8 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/ravex.egg-info/top_level.txt +1 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/setup.cfg +4 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/tests/test_backends.py +193 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/tests/test_bootstrap.py +92 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/tests/test_config.py +151 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/tests/test_e2e_vanilla.py +157 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/tests/test_patches.py +189 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/tests/test_registry.py +155 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/tests/test_resume.py +96 -0
- ravex-0.0.2/tests/test_sampler.py +137 -0
ravex-0.0.2/LICENSE
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Apache License
|
|
2
|
+
Version 2.0, January 2004
|
|
3
|
+
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
1. Definitions.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
"License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
|
|
10
|
+
and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
|
|
13
|
+
the copyright owner that is granting the License.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
"Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
|
|
16
|
+
other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
|
|
17
|
+
control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
|
|
18
|
+
"control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
|
|
19
|
+
direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
|
|
20
|
+
otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
|
|
21
|
+
outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
"You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
|
|
24
|
+
exercising permissions granted by this License.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
"Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
|
|
27
|
+
including but not limited to software source code, documentation
|
|
28
|
+
source, and configuration files.
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
"Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
|
|
31
|
+
transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
|
|
32
|
+
not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
|
|
33
|
+
and conversions to other media types.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
"Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
|
|
36
|
+
Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
|
|
37
|
+
copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
|
|
38
|
+
(an example is provided in the Appendix below).
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
"Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
|
|
41
|
+
form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
|
|
42
|
+
editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
|
|
43
|
+
represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
|
|
44
|
+
of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
|
|
45
|
+
separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
|
|
46
|
+
the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
"Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
|
|
49
|
+
the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
|
|
50
|
+
to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
|
|
51
|
+
submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
|
|
52
|
+
or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
|
|
53
|
+
the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
|
|
54
|
+
means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
|
|
55
|
+
to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
|
|
56
|
+
communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
|
|
57
|
+
and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
|
|
58
|
+
Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
|
|
59
|
+
excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
|
|
60
|
+
designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
"Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
|
|
63
|
+
on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
|
|
64
|
+
subsequently incorporated within the Work.
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
|
|
67
|
+
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
|
|
68
|
+
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
|
|
69
|
+
copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
|
|
70
|
+
publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
|
|
71
|
+
Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
|
|
74
|
+
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
|
|
75
|
+
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
|
|
76
|
+
(except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
|
|
77
|
+
use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
|
|
78
|
+
where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
|
|
79
|
+
by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
|
|
80
|
+
Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
|
|
81
|
+
with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
|
|
82
|
+
institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
|
|
83
|
+
cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
|
|
84
|
+
or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
|
|
85
|
+
or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
|
|
86
|
+
granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
|
|
87
|
+
as of the date such litigation is filed.
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
|
|
90
|
+
Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
|
|
91
|
+
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
|
|
92
|
+
meet the following conditions:
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
(a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
|
|
95
|
+
Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
(b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
|
|
98
|
+
stating that You changed the files; and
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
(c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
|
|
101
|
+
that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
|
|
102
|
+
attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
|
|
103
|
+
excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
|
|
104
|
+
the Derivative Works; and
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
(d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
|
|
107
|
+
distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
|
|
108
|
+
include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
|
|
109
|
+
within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
|
|
110
|
+
pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
|
|
111
|
+
of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
|
|
112
|
+
as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
|
|
113
|
+
documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
|
|
114
|
+
within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
|
|
115
|
+
wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
|
|
116
|
+
of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
|
|
117
|
+
do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
|
|
118
|
+
notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
|
|
119
|
+
or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
|
|
120
|
+
that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
|
|
121
|
+
as modifying the License.
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
|
|
124
|
+
may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
|
|
125
|
+
for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
|
|
126
|
+
for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
|
|
127
|
+
reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
|
|
128
|
+
the conditions stated in this License.
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
|
|
131
|
+
any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
|
|
132
|
+
by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
|
|
133
|
+
this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
|
|
134
|
+
Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
|
|
135
|
+
the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
|
|
136
|
+
with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
|
|
139
|
+
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
|
|
140
|
+
except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
|
|
141
|
+
origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
|
|
144
|
+
agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
|
|
145
|
+
Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
146
|
+
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
|
|
147
|
+
implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
|
|
148
|
+
of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
|
|
149
|
+
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
|
|
150
|
+
appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
|
|
151
|
+
risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
|
|
154
|
+
whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
|
|
155
|
+
unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
|
|
156
|
+
negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
|
|
157
|
+
liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
|
|
158
|
+
incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
|
|
159
|
+
result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
|
|
160
|
+
Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
|
|
161
|
+
work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
|
|
162
|
+
other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
|
|
163
|
+
has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
|
|
166
|
+
the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
|
|
167
|
+
and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
|
|
168
|
+
or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
|
|
169
|
+
License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
|
|
170
|
+
on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
|
|
171
|
+
of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
|
|
172
|
+
defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
|
|
173
|
+
incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
|
|
174
|
+
of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
176
|
+
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
178
|
+
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
|
|
181
|
+
boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
|
|
182
|
+
replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
|
|
183
|
+
the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
|
|
184
|
+
comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
|
|
185
|
+
file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
|
|
186
|
+
same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
|
|
187
|
+
identification within third-party archives.
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
|
|
190
|
+
|
|
191
|
+
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
192
|
+
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
193
|
+
You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
194
|
+
|
|
195
|
+
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
197
|
+
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
198
|
+
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
199
|
+
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
200
|
+
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
201
|
+
limitations under the License.
|
ravex-0.0.2/NOTICE
ADDED
ravex-0.0.2/PKG-INFO
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Metadata-Version: 2.4
|
|
2
|
+
Name: ravex
|
|
3
|
+
Version: 0.0.2
|
|
4
|
+
Summary: Transparent checkpoint and resume for PyTorch training, with no changes to your training code
|
|
5
|
+
Author: JHNMACHINE
|
|
6
|
+
License: Apache-2.0
|
|
7
|
+
Project-URL: Homepage, https://codeberg.org/JHNMACHINE/ravex
|
|
8
|
+
Project-URL: Source, https://codeberg.org/JHNMACHINE/ravex
|
|
9
|
+
Project-URL: Issues, https://codeberg.org/JHNMACHINE/ravex/issues
|
|
10
|
+
Project-URL: Changelog, https://codeberg.org/JHNMACHINE/ravex/src/branch/main/CHANGELOG.md
|
|
11
|
+
Keywords: pytorch,checkpoint,training,resume,mlops,preemption
|
|
12
|
+
Classifier: Development Status :: 3 - Alpha
|
|
13
|
+
Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
|
|
14
|
+
Classifier: Intended Audience :: Science/Research
|
|
15
|
+
Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License
|
|
16
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
|
|
17
|
+
Classifier: Topic :: Scientific/Engineering :: Artificial Intelligence
|
|
18
|
+
Requires-Python: >=3.9
|
|
19
|
+
Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
|
|
20
|
+
License-File: LICENSE
|
|
21
|
+
License-File: NOTICE
|
|
22
|
+
Requires-Dist: PyYAML>=5.1
|
|
23
|
+
Provides-Extra: moonclip
|
|
24
|
+
Requires-Dist: moonclip>=0.0.4; extra == "moonclip"
|
|
25
|
+
Provides-Extra: dev
|
|
26
|
+
Requires-Dist: pytest>=7; extra == "dev"
|
|
27
|
+
Requires-Dist: numpy; extra == "dev"
|
|
28
|
+
Dynamic: license-file
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
# Ravex
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
Transparent checkpoint and resume for PyTorch training. Your training script
|
|
33
|
+
does not change — not one line, not one import.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
```bash
|
|
36
|
+
pip install ravex
|
|
37
|
+
ravex enable
|
|
38
|
+
```
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
Ravex itself is pure Python and installs anywhere. Its default checkpoint engine,
|
|
41
|
+
[Moonclip](https://codeberg.org/JHNMACHINE/moonclip), ships wheels for Linux
|
|
42
|
+
x86_64 only — so `pip install "ravex[moonclip]"` is a Linux thing, and on any
|
|
43
|
+
other platform Ravex falls back to `torch_save` on its own. What changed between
|
|
44
|
+
versions is in
|
|
45
|
+
[CHANGELOG.md](https://codeberg.org/JHNMACHINE/ravex/src/branch/main/CHANGELOG.md).
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
Drop a `ravex.yaml` next to your code and run what you always ran:
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
```bash
|
|
50
|
+
python train.py
|
|
51
|
+
```
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
The run now checkpoints itself. If the process dies — spot instance reclaimed,
|
|
54
|
+
node rebooted, OOM killer, power cut — running the same command again picks up
|
|
55
|
+
where it stopped: same weights, same optimizer moments, same LR schedule, same
|
|
56
|
+
RNG state, same position in the dataset.
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
## Why this is not just `torch.save`
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
Saving the weights is the easy part. What makes a resumed run *continue* rather
|
|
61
|
+
than merely *restart from a good place* is everything around them:
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
| Restored | Why it matters |
|
|
64
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
65
|
+
| Model weights and buffers | the obvious part |
|
|
66
|
+
| Optimizer state | Adam moments; without them the first steps after resume are wrong |
|
|
67
|
+
| LR scheduler | resume at the wrong LR and the loss curve visibly kinks |
|
|
68
|
+
| AMP `GradScaler` | its loss scale is tuned state, not a constant |
|
|
69
|
+
| RNG: torch, CUDA, Python, NumPy | dropout masks and augmentations replay identically |
|
|
70
|
+
| Dataset position | you continue with batch 4001, not batch 1 |
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
Ravex's test suite asserts the strong form of this: a run killed at step 20 and
|
|
73
|
+
resumed produces losses that are **bit-identical**, step by step, to the run
|
|
74
|
+
that was never interrupted, and the same final weights.
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
## Two ways to use it
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
**Zero code changes.** `ravex enable` installs a one-line `.pth` file in
|
|
79
|
+
site-packages, which Python executes at interpreter startup. From then on Ravex
|
|
80
|
+
attaches itself to any training process that has a `ravex.yaml`.
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
**One line**, when you would rather be explicit:
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
```python
|
|
85
|
+
import ravex
|
|
86
|
+
ravex.activate()
|
|
87
|
+
```
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
Both do the same thing. The `.pth` route exists so that a platform can enable
|
|
90
|
+
checkpointing for code it does not own.
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
## Configuration
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
`ravex.yaml`, anywhere at or above the working directory:
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
```yaml
|
|
97
|
+
checkpoint_every: 500 # optimizer steps between checkpoints
|
|
98
|
+
backend: moonclip # moonclip | torch_save
|
|
99
|
+
storage:
|
|
100
|
+
type: local # local | s3 | r2
|
|
101
|
+
path: ./checkpoints
|
|
102
|
+
keep_last: 5
|
|
103
|
+
max_steps: null # optional hard stop, see below
|
|
104
|
+
sharded_checkpoints: gather # gather | per_rank, for FSDP — see below
|
|
105
|
+
```
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
Every option also reads from `RAVEX_*` environment variables, which win over
|
|
108
|
+
the file — so a scheduler can override a config committed to the repository:
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
```bash
|
|
111
|
+
RAVEX_CHECKPOINT_EVERY=100 RAVEX_STORAGE_TYPE=r2 RAVEX_STORAGE_BUCKET=runs python train.py
|
|
112
|
+
```
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
Credentials are never read from the config file. Set `RAVEX_S3_ACCESS_KEY` /
|
|
115
|
+
`RAVEX_S3_SECRET_KEY`, or the usual `AWS_*` pair.
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
Full reference: [docs/configuration.md](docs/configuration.md).
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
## Backends
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
**`moonclip`** (default) — the [Moonclip](https://codeberg.org/JHNMACHINE/moonclip)
|
|
122
|
+
engine: per-tensor delta tracking, so unchanged weights cost zero I/O; zstd
|
|
123
|
+
compression; background writes; direct S3/R2 sync.
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
**`torch_save`** — one `.pt` file per checkpoint, written on a background
|
|
126
|
+
thread. Used automatically when Moonclip is not installed. Correct, just larger
|
|
127
|
+
and slower.
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
## How it works
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
Ravex patches five things in PyTorch and nothing in your code:
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
- `nn.Module.__init__` and `.train()` — to notice your models
|
|
134
|
+
- `Optimizer.__init__` — to attach a step hook to every optimizer
|
|
135
|
+
- `DataLoader.__init__` and `.__iter__` — to track the dataset position and to
|
|
136
|
+
find the one moment where a resume can be applied
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
The step counter advances once per `optimizer.step()`, so gradient accumulation
|
|
139
|
+
needs no special handling. Checkpoints are collected at the *top of an
|
|
140
|
+
iteration*, never inside one: mid-iteration the LR scheduler has not stepped
|
|
141
|
+
yet, and a checkpoint taken there resumes with a stale learning rate.
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
Collection runs on the training thread — it has to, to be consistent with the
|
|
144
|
+
step that just finished — and copies the state; the write itself happens in the
|
|
145
|
+
background. What the loop pays for is the copy, not the I/O.
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
More detail: [docs/how-it-works.md](docs/how-it-works.md).
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
## Safety
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
Ravex is designed to be un-noticeable when it works and harmless when it does
|
|
152
|
+
not:
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
- every hook is wrapped; if one raises, your call still returns normally
|
|
155
|
+
- if a checkpoint fails, Ravex disables itself and logs it — training continues
|
|
156
|
+
- nothing is ever written to stdout; logs go to `log_file`, or to stderr at
|
|
157
|
+
WARNING and above
|
|
158
|
+
- installing the package changes nothing on its own. Without `ravex enable`
|
|
159
|
+
there is no `.pth`; with it, Ravex still only wakes up for projects that have
|
|
160
|
+
a `ravex.yaml` or set `RAVEX_ENABLED=1`
|
|
161
|
+
- `ravex disable` removes the autoloader; `RAVEX_ENABLED=0` turns it off for a
|
|
162
|
+
single run
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
## Status and limits
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
Alpha. Works with plain PyTorch loops, and with anything built on them, since
|
|
167
|
+
the hooks are on PyTorch itself.
|
|
168
|
+
|
|
169
|
+
### With a framework driving the loop
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
HuggingFace `Trainer` and Lightning are covered by their own tests, and the
|
|
172
|
+
result deserves to be stated precisely rather than as "it works":
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
- **State restoration is exact.** Model, optimizer, LR scheduler and step count
|
|
175
|
+
all come back. With the per-step randomness removed, a killed run resumes
|
|
176
|
+
into a loss sequence identical to the uninterrupted one.
|
|
177
|
+
- **Replay is not.** With shuffling and dropout on, the resumed run continues
|
|
178
|
+
correctly from the checkpointed state but sees a different draw. Both
|
|
179
|
+
frameworks iterate the dataloader on their own schedule and consume the
|
|
180
|
+
global RNG around the loop, so the epoch-start snapshot no longer lines up.
|
|
181
|
+
|
|
182
|
+
Plain loops, DDP and FSDP *are* bit-exact with randomness on. This is a
|
|
183
|
+
framework-interaction limit, not a general one, and it costs you a different
|
|
184
|
+
shuffle from the resume point onwards — not a wrong model.
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
186
|
+
Verified: plain loops, gradient accumulation, LR schedulers, AMP loss-scale
|
|
187
|
+
state, `num_workers > 0`, DDP, and FSDP. A killed `torchrun` job resumes on
|
|
188
|
+
*every* rank with bit-identical losses, sharded or not, and the checkpoint it
|
|
189
|
+
leaves behind loads into a plain single-process model afterwards.
|
|
190
|
+
|
|
191
|
+
### Sharded models
|
|
192
|
+
|
|
193
|
+
With FSDP each rank holds a slice of every parameter, so `state_dict()` returns
|
|
194
|
+
a fragment. Two ways to turn that into a checkpoint, picked with
|
|
195
|
+
`sharded_checkpoints`:
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
197
|
+
**`gather`** (default) rebuilds the whole state on rank 0, which writes it. The
|
|
198
|
+
checkpoint is then independent of the topology that produced it — eight GPUs in,
|
|
199
|
+
one out — and it does not scale: rank 0 has to hold the entire model and
|
|
200
|
+
optimizer in host memory, and it is the rank that then does the writing.
|
|
201
|
+
|
|
202
|
+
**`per_rank`** has every rank write its own shard into its own store,
|
|
203
|
+
`<storage.path>/rank_<n>`. Nothing is gathered, so nothing is bounded by one
|
|
204
|
+
rank's memory, and on a 1.48B model collecting the state went from 15.6 s to
|
|
205
|
+
1.5 s. What you give up is the resharding: those shards are cut for one topology,
|
|
206
|
+
so the checkpoint resumes at the same world size and starts clean at any other.
|
|
207
|
+
Needs FSDP2 — under FSDP1 Ravex degrades to `gather` and says so.
|
|
208
|
+
|
|
209
|
+
Either way, collecting is a **collective**: every rank participates, and there is
|
|
210
|
+
**no final checkpoint at exit** for a sharded model. Shutdown is where ranks stop
|
|
211
|
+
being in lockstep, and a collective nobody else joins hangs. Losing the last few
|
|
212
|
+
steps is bounded; a hang is not. Set `checkpoint_every` accordingly.
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
Numbers and the FSDP1 details: [docs/configuration.md](docs/configuration.md).
|
|
215
|
+
|
|
216
|
+
Known limits today:
|
|
217
|
+
|
|
218
|
+
- **`IterableDataset`**: no index sampler exists, so the stream position cannot
|
|
219
|
+
be replayed. Everything else is still restored.
|
|
220
|
+
- **Your loop's bounds**: a resumed script runs its own `for epoch in
|
|
221
|
+
range(N)` again from the top; it has no idea 3000 steps already happened. Set
|
|
222
|
+
`max_steps` and Ravex ends the run at the right step regardless of how many
|
|
223
|
+
times the process restarted.
|
|
224
|
+
|
|
225
|
+
Under AMP, note that an overflowing gradient makes `scaler.step()` skip the
|
|
226
|
+
optimizer. Ravex counts optimizer steps, not loop iterations, so a skipped
|
|
227
|
+
iteration does not advance the counter — which is the right unit, since nothing
|
|
228
|
+
about the model changed, but it does mean the step count and the number of
|
|
229
|
+
batches you fed differ.
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
The GPU paths — AMP with real fp16 overflow, the CUDA RNG, FSDP1, NCCL — are
|
|
232
|
+
covered by `integration/test_cuda.py`, which skips without a GPU. They were
|
|
233
|
+
last verified on 8× RTX 5060 Ti with torch 2.12/cu130.
|
|
234
|
+
|
|
235
|
+
## Development
|
|
236
|
+
|
|
237
|
+
```bash
|
|
238
|
+
pip install -e ".[dev]"
|
|
239
|
+
pytest
|
|
240
|
+
```
|
|
241
|
+
|
|
242
|
+
The unit suite runs in-process. The parts that only exist across a real process
|
|
243
|
+
boundary — the `.pth` autoloader, a resume starting from an empty interpreter,
|
|
244
|
+
`torchrun` — live in `integration/` and need Linux:
|
|
245
|
+
|
|
246
|
+
```bash
|
|
247
|
+
docker build -f integration/Dockerfile -t ravex-integration .
|
|
248
|
+
docker run --rm ravex-integration
|
|
249
|
+
```
|
|
250
|
+
|
|
251
|
+
## Licence
|
|
252
|
+
|
|
253
|
+
Apache 2.0. See [LICENSE](LICENSE).
|
ravex-0.0.2/README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Ravex
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Transparent checkpoint and resume for PyTorch training. Your training script
|
|
4
|
+
does not change — not one line, not one import.
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
```bash
|
|
7
|
+
pip install ravex
|
|
8
|
+
ravex enable
|
|
9
|
+
```
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
Ravex itself is pure Python and installs anywhere. Its default checkpoint engine,
|
|
12
|
+
[Moonclip](https://codeberg.org/JHNMACHINE/moonclip), ships wheels for Linux
|
|
13
|
+
x86_64 only — so `pip install "ravex[moonclip]"` is a Linux thing, and on any
|
|
14
|
+
other platform Ravex falls back to `torch_save` on its own. What changed between
|
|
15
|
+
versions is in
|
|
16
|
+
[CHANGELOG.md](https://codeberg.org/JHNMACHINE/ravex/src/branch/main/CHANGELOG.md).
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
Drop a `ravex.yaml` next to your code and run what you always ran:
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
```bash
|
|
21
|
+
python train.py
|
|
22
|
+
```
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
The run now checkpoints itself. If the process dies — spot instance reclaimed,
|
|
25
|
+
node rebooted, OOM killer, power cut — running the same command again picks up
|
|
26
|
+
where it stopped: same weights, same optimizer moments, same LR schedule, same
|
|
27
|
+
RNG state, same position in the dataset.
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Why this is not just `torch.save`
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Saving the weights is the easy part. What makes a resumed run *continue* rather
|
|
32
|
+
than merely *restart from a good place* is everything around them:
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
| Restored | Why it matters |
|
|
35
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
36
|
+
| Model weights and buffers | the obvious part |
|
|
37
|
+
| Optimizer state | Adam moments; without them the first steps after resume are wrong |
|
|
38
|
+
| LR scheduler | resume at the wrong LR and the loss curve visibly kinks |
|
|
39
|
+
| AMP `GradScaler` | its loss scale is tuned state, not a constant |
|
|
40
|
+
| RNG: torch, CUDA, Python, NumPy | dropout masks and augmentations replay identically |
|
|
41
|
+
| Dataset position | you continue with batch 4001, not batch 1 |
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
Ravex's test suite asserts the strong form of this: a run killed at step 20 and
|
|
44
|
+
resumed produces losses that are **bit-identical**, step by step, to the run
|
|
45
|
+
that was never interrupted, and the same final weights.
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
## Two ways to use it
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
**Zero code changes.** `ravex enable` installs a one-line `.pth` file in
|
|
50
|
+
site-packages, which Python executes at interpreter startup. From then on Ravex
|
|
51
|
+
attaches itself to any training process that has a `ravex.yaml`.
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
**One line**, when you would rather be explicit:
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
```python
|
|
56
|
+
import ravex
|
|
57
|
+
ravex.activate()
|
|
58
|
+
```
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
Both do the same thing. The `.pth` route exists so that a platform can enable
|
|
61
|
+
checkpointing for code it does not own.
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
## Configuration
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
`ravex.yaml`, anywhere at or above the working directory:
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
```yaml
|
|
68
|
+
checkpoint_every: 500 # optimizer steps between checkpoints
|
|
69
|
+
backend: moonclip # moonclip | torch_save
|
|
70
|
+
storage:
|
|
71
|
+
type: local # local | s3 | r2
|
|
72
|
+
path: ./checkpoints
|
|
73
|
+
keep_last: 5
|
|
74
|
+
max_steps: null # optional hard stop, see below
|
|
75
|
+
sharded_checkpoints: gather # gather | per_rank, for FSDP — see below
|
|
76
|
+
```
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
Every option also reads from `RAVEX_*` environment variables, which win over
|
|
79
|
+
the file — so a scheduler can override a config committed to the repository:
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
```bash
|
|
82
|
+
RAVEX_CHECKPOINT_EVERY=100 RAVEX_STORAGE_TYPE=r2 RAVEX_STORAGE_BUCKET=runs python train.py
|
|
83
|
+
```
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
Credentials are never read from the config file. Set `RAVEX_S3_ACCESS_KEY` /
|
|
86
|
+
`RAVEX_S3_SECRET_KEY`, or the usual `AWS_*` pair.
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
Full reference: [docs/configuration.md](docs/configuration.md).
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
## Backends
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
**`moonclip`** (default) — the [Moonclip](https://codeberg.org/JHNMACHINE/moonclip)
|
|
93
|
+
engine: per-tensor delta tracking, so unchanged weights cost zero I/O; zstd
|
|
94
|
+
compression; background writes; direct S3/R2 sync.
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
**`torch_save`** — one `.pt` file per checkpoint, written on a background
|
|
97
|
+
thread. Used automatically when Moonclip is not installed. Correct, just larger
|
|
98
|
+
and slower.
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
## How it works
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
Ravex patches five things in PyTorch and nothing in your code:
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
- `nn.Module.__init__` and `.train()` — to notice your models
|
|
105
|
+
- `Optimizer.__init__` — to attach a step hook to every optimizer
|
|
106
|
+
- `DataLoader.__init__` and `.__iter__` — to track the dataset position and to
|
|
107
|
+
find the one moment where a resume can be applied
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
The step counter advances once per `optimizer.step()`, so gradient accumulation
|
|
110
|
+
needs no special handling. Checkpoints are collected at the *top of an
|
|
111
|
+
iteration*, never inside one: mid-iteration the LR scheduler has not stepped
|
|
112
|
+
yet, and a checkpoint taken there resumes with a stale learning rate.
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
Collection runs on the training thread — it has to, to be consistent with the
|
|
115
|
+
step that just finished — and copies the state; the write itself happens in the
|
|
116
|
+
background. What the loop pays for is the copy, not the I/O.
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
More detail: [docs/how-it-works.md](docs/how-it-works.md).
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
## Safety
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
Ravex is designed to be un-noticeable when it works and harmless when it does
|
|
123
|
+
not:
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
- every hook is wrapped; if one raises, your call still returns normally
|
|
126
|
+
- if a checkpoint fails, Ravex disables itself and logs it — training continues
|
|
127
|
+
- nothing is ever written to stdout; logs go to `log_file`, or to stderr at
|
|
128
|
+
WARNING and above
|
|
129
|
+
- installing the package changes nothing on its own. Without `ravex enable`
|
|
130
|
+
there is no `.pth`; with it, Ravex still only wakes up for projects that have
|
|
131
|
+
a `ravex.yaml` or set `RAVEX_ENABLED=1`
|
|
132
|
+
- `ravex disable` removes the autoloader; `RAVEX_ENABLED=0` turns it off for a
|
|
133
|
+
single run
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
## Status and limits
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
Alpha. Works with plain PyTorch loops, and with anything built on them, since
|
|
138
|
+
the hooks are on PyTorch itself.
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
### With a framework driving the loop
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
HuggingFace `Trainer` and Lightning are covered by their own tests, and the
|
|
143
|
+
result deserves to be stated precisely rather than as "it works":
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
- **State restoration is exact.** Model, optimizer, LR scheduler and step count
|
|
146
|
+
all come back. With the per-step randomness removed, a killed run resumes
|
|
147
|
+
into a loss sequence identical to the uninterrupted one.
|
|
148
|
+
- **Replay is not.** With shuffling and dropout on, the resumed run continues
|
|
149
|
+
correctly from the checkpointed state but sees a different draw. Both
|
|
150
|
+
frameworks iterate the dataloader on their own schedule and consume the
|
|
151
|
+
global RNG around the loop, so the epoch-start snapshot no longer lines up.
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
Plain loops, DDP and FSDP *are* bit-exact with randomness on. This is a
|
|
154
|
+
framework-interaction limit, not a general one, and it costs you a different
|
|
155
|
+
shuffle from the resume point onwards — not a wrong model.
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
Verified: plain loops, gradient accumulation, LR schedulers, AMP loss-scale
|
|
158
|
+
state, `num_workers > 0`, DDP, and FSDP. A killed `torchrun` job resumes on
|
|
159
|
+
*every* rank with bit-identical losses, sharded or not, and the checkpoint it
|
|
160
|
+
leaves behind loads into a plain single-process model afterwards.
|
|
161
|
+
|
|
162
|
+
### Sharded models
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
With FSDP each rank holds a slice of every parameter, so `state_dict()` returns
|
|
165
|
+
a fragment. Two ways to turn that into a checkpoint, picked with
|
|
166
|
+
`sharded_checkpoints`:
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
**`gather`** (default) rebuilds the whole state on rank 0, which writes it. The
|
|
169
|
+
checkpoint is then independent of the topology that produced it — eight GPUs in,
|
|
170
|
+
one out — and it does not scale: rank 0 has to hold the entire model and
|
|
171
|
+
optimizer in host memory, and it is the rank that then does the writing.
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
**`per_rank`** has every rank write its own shard into its own store,
|
|
174
|
+
`<storage.path>/rank_<n>`. Nothing is gathered, so nothing is bounded by one
|
|
175
|
+
rank's memory, and on a 1.48B model collecting the state went from 15.6 s to
|
|
176
|
+
1.5 s. What you give up is the resharding: those shards are cut for one topology,
|
|
177
|
+
so the checkpoint resumes at the same world size and starts clean at any other.
|
|
178
|
+
Needs FSDP2 — under FSDP1 Ravex degrades to `gather` and says so.
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
Either way, collecting is a **collective**: every rank participates, and there is
|
|
181
|
+
**no final checkpoint at exit** for a sharded model. Shutdown is where ranks stop
|
|
182
|
+
being in lockstep, and a collective nobody else joins hangs. Losing the last few
|
|
183
|
+
steps is bounded; a hang is not. Set `checkpoint_every` accordingly.
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
Numbers and the FSDP1 details: [docs/configuration.md](docs/configuration.md).
|
|
186
|
+
|
|
187
|
+
Known limits today:
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
- **`IterableDataset`**: no index sampler exists, so the stream position cannot
|
|
190
|
+
be replayed. Everything else is still restored.
|
|
191
|
+
- **Your loop's bounds**: a resumed script runs its own `for epoch in
|
|
192
|
+
range(N)` again from the top; it has no idea 3000 steps already happened. Set
|
|
193
|
+
`max_steps` and Ravex ends the run at the right step regardless of how many
|
|
194
|
+
times the process restarted.
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
Under AMP, note that an overflowing gradient makes `scaler.step()` skip the
|
|
197
|
+
optimizer. Ravex counts optimizer steps, not loop iterations, so a skipped
|
|
198
|
+
iteration does not advance the counter — which is the right unit, since nothing
|
|
199
|
+
about the model changed, but it does mean the step count and the number of
|
|
200
|
+
batches you fed differ.
|
|
201
|
+
|
|
202
|
+
The GPU paths — AMP with real fp16 overflow, the CUDA RNG, FSDP1, NCCL — are
|
|
203
|
+
covered by `integration/test_cuda.py`, which skips without a GPU. They were
|
|
204
|
+
last verified on 8× RTX 5060 Ti with torch 2.12/cu130.
|
|
205
|
+
|
|
206
|
+
## Development
|
|
207
|
+
|
|
208
|
+
```bash
|
|
209
|
+
pip install -e ".[dev]"
|
|
210
|
+
pytest
|
|
211
|
+
```
|
|
212
|
+
|
|
213
|
+
The unit suite runs in-process. The parts that only exist across a real process
|
|
214
|
+
boundary — the `.pth` autoloader, a resume starting from an empty interpreter,
|
|
215
|
+
`torchrun` — live in `integration/` and need Linux:
|
|
216
|
+
|
|
217
|
+
```bash
|
|
218
|
+
docker build -f integration/Dockerfile -t ravex-integration .
|
|
219
|
+
docker run --rm ravex-integration
|
|
220
|
+
```
|
|
221
|
+
|
|
222
|
+
## Licence
|
|
223
|
+
|
|
224
|
+
Apache 2.0. See [LICENSE](LICENSE).
|