process-improve 1.97.2__tar.gz → 1.98.0__tar.gz

process_improve-1.98.0/PKG-INFO

@@ -0,0 +1,408 @@
+Metadata-Version: 2.4
+Name: process-improve
+Version: 1.98.0
+Summary: Designed Experiments; Latent Variables (PCA, PLS, multivariate methods with missing data); Process Monitoring; Batch data analysis.
+Keywords: Designed Experiments,Design of Experiments,DoE,Optimal Design,Response Surface,Latent Variables,PCA,PLS,Multivariate Data Analysis,Chemometrics,Process Monitoring,Batch data analysis
+Author: Kevin Dunn
+Author-email: Kevin Dunn <kgdunn@gmail.com>
+License-Expression: MIT
+Classifier: Development Status :: 4 - Beta
+Classifier: Intended Audience :: Science/Research
+Classifier: Operating System :: OS Independent
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.10
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.13
+Classifier: Topic :: Scientific/Engineering
+Classifier: Topic :: Scientific/Engineering :: Information Analysis
+Requires-Dist: numpy>=2.2.6
+Requires-Dist: pandas>=2.3.3
+Requires-Dist: patsy>=1.0.2
+Requires-Dist: pydantic>=2.12.5
+Requires-Dist: pyyaml>=6.0
+Requires-Dist: scikit-learn>=1.7.2
+Requires-Dist: scipy>=1.15
+Requires-Dist: statsmodels>=0.14.6
+Requires-Dist: threadpoolctl>=3.5.0
+Requires-Dist: tqdm>=4.67.1
+Requires-Dist: matplotlib>=3.10.8 ; extra == 'all'
+Requires-Dist: mcp>=2.0 ; extra == 'all'
+Requires-Dist: numba>=0.63.1 ; extra == 'all'
+Requires-Dist: openpyxl>=3.1.5 ; extra == 'all'
+Requires-Dist: osqp>=1.0 ; extra == 'all'
+Requires-Dist: plotly>=6.5.2 ; extra == 'all'
+Requires-Dist: ridgeplot>=0.5.0 ; extra == 'all'
+Requires-Dist: ruptures>=1.1.9 ; extra == 'all'
+Requires-Dist: scikit-image>=0.25.2 ; extra == 'all'
+Requires-Dist: seaborn>=0.13.2 ; extra == 'all'
+Requires-Dist: openpyxl>=3.1.5 ; extra == 'batch'
+Requires-Dist: ruptures>=1.1.9 ; extra == 'batch'
+Requires-Dist: scikit-image>=0.25.2 ; extra == 'batch'
+Requires-Dist: osqp>=1.0 ; extra == 'control'
+Requires-Dist: coverage>=7.13.1 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: hypothesis>=6.100 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: matplotlib-stubs>=0.3.11 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: mypy>=1.19.1,<2.5 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: pandas-stubs>=2.3.3.260113 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: plotly-stubs>=0.0.6 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: pre-commit>=4.5.1 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: pytest>=9.0.2 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: pytest-benchmark>=4.0.0 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: pytest-cov>=7.0.0 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: pytest-xdist>=3.8.0 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: pydata-sphinx-theme>=0.16.1 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: ruff>=0.11.0,<0.17 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: sphinx>=8.1.3 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: nbsphinx>=0.9.5 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: ipykernel>=6.29 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: tqdm-stubs>=0.2.1 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: watchdog>=6.0.0 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: numba>=0.63.1 ; extra == 'fast'
+Requires-Dist: mcp>=2.0 ; extra == 'mcp'
+Requires-Dist: matplotlib>=3.10.8 ; extra == 'plotting'
+Requires-Dist: plotly>=6.5.2 ; extra == 'plotting'
+Requires-Dist: ridgeplot>=0.5.0 ; extra == 'plotting'
+Requires-Dist: seaborn>=0.13.2 ; extra == 'plotting'
+Requires-Python: >=3.10
+Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve
+Project-URL: Documentation, https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/
+Project-URL: Try it in your browser, https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/app/
+Project-URL: Textbook, https://learnche.org/pid
+Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve
+Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve/issues
+Project-URL: Changelog, https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
+Provides-Extra: all
+Provides-Extra: batch
+Provides-Extra: control
+Provides-Extra: dev
+Provides-Extra: fast
+Provides-Extra: ilp
+Provides-Extra: mcp
+Provides-Extra: plotting
+Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
+
+# process-improve
+
+**Designed experiments, multivariate analysis and process monitoring for Python.**
+Built for the chemometrics, manufacturing and pharma workflows where you need to know
+not just *what fits*, but *which factors matter, is this observation normal, which
+variable moved, and how sure am I?*
+
+<picture>
+  <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kgdunn/process-improve/main/docs/_static/readme/banner-dark.png">
+  <img alt="Four experimental designs from one generate_design call: a definitive screening design, a central composite design, a constrained I-optimal design and a MaxPro space-filling design" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kgdunn/process-improve/main/docs/_static/readme/banner-light.png">
+</picture>
+
+[![PyPI version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/process-improve.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/process-improve/)
+[![Python versions](https://img.shields.io/python/required-version-toml?tomlFilePath=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githubusercontent.com%2Fkgdunn%2Fprocess-improve%2Fmain%2Fpyproject.toml&label=python)](https://pypi.org/project/process-improve/)
+[![Downloads](https://static.pepy.tech/badge/process-improve)](https://pepy.tech/project/process-improve)
+[![Downloads per month](https://static.pepy.tech/badge/process-improve/month)](https://pepy.tech/project/process-improve)
+[![CI](https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve/actions/workflows/run-tests.yml/badge.svg?branch=main&event=push)](https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve/actions/workflows/run-tests.yml?query=branch%3Amain)
+[![codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/kgdunn/process-improve/branch/main/graph/badge.svg)](https://codecov.io/gh/kgdunn/process-improve)
+[![Docs](https://img.shields.io/badge/docs-kgdunn.github.io-blue.svg)](https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/)
+[![License](https://img.shields.io/pypi/l/process-improve.svg)](https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve/blob/main/LICENSE)
+
+**[Try it in your browser](https://factori.al/)** ·
+[Documentation](https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/) ·
+[Free textbook](https://learnche.org/pid) ·
+[Design gallery](#designed-experiments-in-one-call)
+
+```bash
+pip install process-improve
+```
+
+## Try it without installing anything
+
+<a href="https://factori.al/"><img width="600" alt="The designed-experiments app in a browser tab: a Box-Behnken design, its results simulated from a known process, the fitted coefficients beside the true ones, and every design for the same factors compared on nine measures" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kgdunn/process-improve/main/docs/_static/readme/app-demo.gif"></a>
+
+[Factorial](https://factori.al/), the designed-experiments app, runs
+this package inside your browser tab (Pyodide / WebAssembly). Design an experiment, then simulate
+its results from a process whose true model is known, or type in your own, and read the
+analysis beside the truth. Compare every design for your factors on the nine measures of
+[Process Improvement using Data](https://learnche.org/pid), and copy the Python behind each
+step. The analysis runs on your machine, and your data never leave it.
+
+## Learn the methods
+
+- **Free textbook:** [Process Improvement using Data](https://learnche.org/pid), the
+  companion to this package, from data visualization to latent-variable models, designed
+  experiments and process monitoring.
+- **API reference and user guide:** <https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/>
+- **Applied DoE tutorial (8 modules):** <https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/applied_doe/index.html>
+- **Every design family and its `design_type`:** <https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/user_guide/doe_coverage.html>
+- **Fully worked quickstart:** <https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/quickstart.html>
+
+## Ask a question, get one line of code and the chapter that explains it
+
+Under each question is the chapter of the free textbook that explains the method.
+
+| You want to know | One call |
+| --- | --- |
+| **Which design should I run?**<br>[Comparing design families](https://learnche.org/pid/design-analysis-experiments/comparing-design-families) | `recommend_strategy(factors=factors, budget=30)` |
+| **Which of my factors matter?**<br>[Definitive screening designs](https://learnche.org/pid/design-analysis-experiments/definitive-screening-designs) | `generate_design(factors, design_type="dsd")` |
+| **Which effects are real?**<br>[Significance of effects](https://learnche.org/pid/design-analysis-experiments/full-factorial-designs/assessing-significance-of-main-effects-and-interactions) | `analyze_experiment(design.design, responses)` |
+| **Which way is the optimum?**<br>[Response surface methods](https://learnche.org/pid/design-analysis-experiments/response-surface-methods) | `optimize_responses([fit], method="steepest_ascent")` |
+| **Is this observation normal?**<br>[Hotelling's T²](https://learnche.org/pid/latent-variable-modelling/principal-component-analysis/hotellings-t2-statistic) | `pca.diagnose(new).spe` |
+| **Which variable moved?**<br>[Contribution plots](https://learnche.org/pid/latent-variable-modelling/principal-component-analysis/latent-variable-contribution-plots) | `pca.spe_contributions(new)` |
+| **How sure is this prediction?**<br>[Projection to latent structures](https://learnche.org/pid/latent-variable-modelling/projection-to-latent-structures/index) | `pls.prediction_interval(new)` |
+| **Which recipe hits my target?**<br>[Using a PLS model backwards](https://learnche.org/pid/latent-variable-modelling/projection-to-latent-structures/pls-model-inversion-and-the-orthogonal-space) | `model.invert(y_desired=20.9)` |
+| **Is the process in control?**<br>[Shewhart charts](https://learnche.org/pid/process-monitoring/shewhart-charts) | `ControlChart().calculate_limits(y)` |
+| **Is this batch on track?**<br>[Batch process monitoring](https://learnche.org/pid/product-development-product-improvement/batch-process-monitoring) | `BatchMonitor(model).fit(good).monitor(batch)` |
+
+## Designed experiments in one call
+
+```python
+from process_improve.experiments import Factor, generate_design
+
+factors = [
+    Factor(name="Temperature", low=150, high=200, units="degC"),
+    Factor(name="Pressure", low=1, high=5, units="bar"),
+    Factor(name="Catalyst", low=0.5, high=2.0, units="g"),
+]
+design = generate_design(factors, design_type="dsd")  # a definitive screening design
+print(design.n_runs)  # 9
+run_sheet = design.design_actual  # in your units, ready to run
+```
+
+Change `design_type` and the same call builds any of these, each true to its
+[published definition](https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/user_guide/doe_coverage.html).
+Leave `design_type` out and give a `budget`, and one is chosen for you.
+
+<a href="https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/user_guide/doe_coverage.html"><picture>
+  <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kgdunn/process-improve/main/docs/_static/readme/design-gallery-dark.png">
+  <img width="560" alt="Sixteen designs drawn from generate_design: supersaturated, Plackett-Burman, fractional and full factorial, definitive screening, central composite, Box-Behnken, OMARS, Taguchi, D-optimal, constrained I-optimal, constrained mixture, Latin hypercube, uniform, MaxPro and Sobol" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kgdunn/process-improve/main/docs/_static/readme/design-gallery-light.png">
+</picture></a>
+
+`evaluate_design` scores any design (efficiencies, prediction variance, fraction of design
+space, aliasing), `analyze_experiment` fits it, `augment_design` extends it, and
+`optimize_responses` finds the best settings for several responses at once. Not sure where
+to start? Ask for a whole strategy:
+
+```python
+from process_improve.experiments import Response
+from process_improve.experiments.strategy import recommend_strategy
+
+strategy = recommend_strategy(
+    factors=factors,  # the three factors above
+    responses=[Response(name="Yield", goal="maximize", units="%")],
+    budget=30,
+)
+print([(stage["design_type"], stage["estimated_runs"]) for stage in strategy["stages"]])  # [('full_factorial', 8), ('ccd', 17), ('replicates_at_optimum', 3)]
+```
+
+## Quick start: real data, real answers
+
+The examples below use measurements from a low-density polyethylene reactor: 54 runs,
+14 process variables and 5 quality measurements of the polymer. The last four runs come
+from a process upset. Paste the blocks in order and you get the numbers in the comments.
+
+### Is this observation normal, and which variable moved?
+
+```python
+import pandas as pd
+from process_improve.multivariate import PCA, MCUVScaler
+
+ldpe = pd.read_csv("https://openmv.net/file/LDPE.csv", index_col=0)
+process, quality = ldpe.loc[:, "Tin":"Press"], ldpe.loc[:, "Conv":"SCB"]
+
+# Learn normal operation from the first 50 runs, then check the last four
+scaler = MCUVScaler().fit(process.loc[:50])
+pca = PCA(n_components=3).fit(scaler.transform(process.loc[:50]))
+new = scaler.transform(process.loc[51:])
+
+# SPE above its limit means "unlike anything seen in normal operation"
+print(pca.diagnose(new).spe.round(1).to_list())  # [2.3, 3.7, 5.3, 7.6]
+print(round(pca.spe_limit(conf_level=0.95), 1))  # 3.4
+
+# Which variables moved in run 54? All three belong to the second reactor zone
+print(pca.spe_contributions(new).loc[54].abs().nlargest(3).round(1).to_dict())  # {'z2': 5.9, 'Fi2': 3.1, 'Tcin2': 1.9}
+pca.score_plot()  # interactive Plotly figure
+```
+
+### How sure is this prediction?
+
+```python
+from process_improve.multivariate import PLS
+
+# Hold out runs 41 to 50 and predict their 5 quality measurements, with 95% intervals
+x_scaler, y_scaler = MCUVScaler().fit(process.loc[:40]), MCUVScaler().fit(quality.loc[:40])
+n = PLS.select_n_components(process.loc[:40], quality.loc[:40], max_components=6, random_state=0).n_components
+pls = PLS(n_components=n).fit(x_scaler.transform(process.loc[:40]), y_scaler.transform(quality.loc[:40]))
+interval = pls.prediction_interval(x_scaler.transform(process.loc[41:50]))
+low, high = y_scaler.inverse_transform(interval.lower), y_scaler.inverse_transform(interval.upper)
+
+# Cross-validation picks 3 components, and 48 of the 50 held-out measurements land inside
+inside = (quality.loc[41:50] >= low) & (quality.loc[41:50] <= high)
+print(n, int(inside.to_numpy().sum()))  # 3 48
+
+# The quality is driven by the same reactor zone that moved in the upset
+print(pls.vip().nlargest(3).round(2).to_dict())  # {'z2': 1.38, 'Fi2': 1.38, 'Tmax2': 1.37}
+```
+
+### Which recipe hits my target?
+
+```python
+from process_improve.multivariate import OPLS
+
+# Acetic acid, H2S and lactic acid in 26 cheddar cheeses, and their taste score
+cheese = pd.read_csv("https://openmv.net/file/cheddar-cheese.csv").iloc[4:]
+X, y = cheese[["Acetic", "H2S", "Lactic"]], cheese[["Taste"]]
+model = PLS(n_components=2).fit(X, y)
+
+recipe = model.invert(y_desired=20.9)  # the inputs predicted to give a taste of 20.9
+print(recipe.x_new.round(2).to_list())  # [5.52, 5.56, 1.4]
+print(round(recipe.hotellings_t2, 2))  # 0.06
+print(recipe.null_space_dimension)  # 1
+
+# One free direction: a line of recipes with the same predicted taste
+walk = [model.invert(20.9, null_space_coordinates=[s]).x_new.round(2).to_list() for s in (-1.0, 0.0, 1.0)]
+print(walk)  # [[4.95, 6.1, 1.33], [5.52, 5.56, 1.4], [6.09, 5.02, 1.46]]
+
+# O-PLS separates that freedom while fitting, so inversion becomes one division
+opls = OPLS(n_orthogonal_components=1).fit(X, y)
+print(opls.invert(y_desired=20.9).x_new.round(2).to_list())  # [5.46, 5.62, 1.39]
+```
+
+The freedom along that line is what you spend on cost, supply or a regulatory window; the
+`hotellings_t2` tells you when a recipe has walked past the evidence. The
+[user guide](https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/user_guide/model_inversion.html) and the
+[book chapter](https://learnche.org/pid/latent-variable-modelling/projection-to-latent-structures/pls-model-inversion-and-the-orthogonal-space)
+go further.
+
+### Has the process drifted?
+
+```python
+from process_improve.multivariate import AdaptivePCA
+
+# Learn from the first 50 runs in their own units (the model centres and scales itself),
+# then stream the last four, one at a time
+monitor = AdaptivePCA(n_components=3).fit(process.loc[:50])
+alarms = [not monitor.update(row.to_numpy()).in_control for _, row in process.loc[51:].iterrows()]
+print(alarms)  # [False, True, True, True]
+```
+
+`AdaptivePCA` and `AdaptivePLS` keep learning as data arrive, so a model does not go stale
+when the process drifts, and they report how far it has moved from where it was trained.
+
+## What's inside
+
+- **Designed experiments**: factorial, screening (Plackett-Burman, DSD, supersaturated),
+  response-surface (CCD, Box-Behnken, OMARS), mixture, space-filling and optimal (D, I, A, E,
+  G, K) designs, in constrained regions too; design evaluation, analysis (including split
+  plots), augmentation, multi-response optimisation and a multi-stage strategy recommender.
+- **PCA** with SVD and NIPALS, native missing-value handling by Trimmed Score Regression,
+  Hotelling's T² and SPE limits, and score, T² and SPE contributions.
+- **PLS** regression with a scikit-learn API, VIP, cross-validated component selection and
+  prediction intervals; **PLS-DA** classification with a Bayesian decision rule for
+  unbalanced classes and a permutation test that says whether the separation is real.
+- **Model inversion**: `PLS.invert()` and `OPLS` solve for the inputs that reach a target
+  and return the null space of equally valid designs.
+- **Multi-block and T-shaped data**: TPLS (PLS for T-shaped data structures), MBPCA and MBPLS.
+- **On-line models**: `AdaptivePCA` and `AdaptivePLS` for monitoring and soft sensing.
+- **Process monitoring**: Shewhart, EWMA, CUSUM and Holt-Winters control charts, process capability.
+- **Batch data**: alignment, feature extraction, batch PCA and PLS, on-line batch monitoring.
+- **Sensory panels**: panel validation, the Mixed Assessor Model, attribute-to-product relations.
+- **Robust regression**: repeated-median and Theil-Sen estimators for data with outliers.
+- **Interactive Plotly diagnostics** on every fitted model, and `pandas`-native outputs that
+  keep your row and column labels.
+
+Release notes are in the [changelog](https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md).
+
+## Works alongside scikit-learn
+
+`process-improve` sits *next to* scikit-learn, not in place of it. Its estimators follow the
+same conventions (`fit`, `predict`, `score`, the `_` suffix on fitted attributes), so they
+drop into `Pipeline`, `GridSearchCV` and `cross_val_score`. What it adds is the
+process-analytics layer: the diagnostics that tell you whether a new observation is normal,
+which variable moved, and how confident a prediction is.
+
+| Capability                                        | scikit-learn | process-improve |
+| ------------------------------------------------- | :----------: | :-------------: |
+| PCA, PLS with sklearn-style API                   |       ✓      |        ✓        |
+| Missing-data fitting (NIPALS / TSR)               |       -      |        ✓        |
+| Hotelling's T² + SPE outlier limits               |       -      |        ✓        |
+| Variable-level contributions                      |       -      |        ✓        |
+| Prediction intervals for PLS                      |       -      |        ✓        |
+| Multi-block models (TPLS, MBPLS)                  |       -      |        ✓        |
+| Model inversion: design inputs for a target       |       -      |        ✓        |
+| On-line / adaptive monitoring (recursive PCA/PLS) |       -      |        ✓        |
+| Designed experiments, incl. OMARS & optimal       |       -      |        ✓        |
+| Shewhart, EWMA, CUSUM, Holt-Winters charts        |       -      |        ✓        |
+| Batch process monitoring                          |       -      |        ✓        |
+| Plotly diagnostics built in                       |       -      |        ✓        |
+| Labeled `DataFrame` outputs                       |    partial   |        ✓        |
+
+`fit()` returns `self`, fitted attributes end with an underscore (`scores_`, `loadings_`,
+`spe_`, `hotellings_t2_`, `r2_cumulative_`, ...), `predict()` returns predictions, and
+`diagnose()` returns an `sklearn.utils.Bunch` with named fields such as `spe` and
+`hotellings_t2`. Pipelines that mix scaled numeric and one-hot encoded columns, and the
+current gaps, are in
+[SKLEARN_COMPATIBILITY.md](https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve/blob/main/SKLEARN_COMPATIBILITY.md).
+
+## Installation
+
+```bash
+pip install process-improve                    # core: numpy, pandas, scipy, scikit-learn, statsmodels, ...
+pip install 'process-improve[plotting]'        # adds matplotlib, plotly, seaborn, ridgeplot
+pip install 'process-improve[batch]'           # adds openpyxl, ruptures, scikit-image (batch data IO, change points)
+pip install 'process-improve[control]'         # adds osqp (the batch mid-course correction solver)
+pip install 'process-improve[mcp]'             # adds mcp (the MCP server runtime)
+pip install 'process-improve[fast]'            # adds numba (JIT speedups for batch alignment)
+pip install 'process-improve[all]'             # everything above
+```
+
+Requires Python 3.10 or newer. The core install pulls in `numpy`, `pandas`, `scipy`,
+`scikit-learn`, `statsmodels`, `patsy`, `pydantic`, `pyyaml`, `threadpoolctl` and `tqdm`.
+Heavier optional surfaces (plotting, Taguchi arrays, batch IO, batch control, the MCP server, numba JIT)
+live in extras, so a caller who only needs, say, `detect_multivariate_outliers` does not have
+to install Plotly or numba.
+
+## Use it from Claude
+
+The designed-experiments tooling ships as a Claude Skill, so you can plan, generate, verify
+and analyse experiments in your own Claude account with no server involved:
+
+```
+/plugin marketplace add kgdunn/process-improve
+/plugin install doe-designer@process-improve
+```
+
+The skill's first rule is that a design matrix is never written out by the model: it is
+generated from a catalogue and then verified, because a language model asked to produce a
+fractional factorial will often return one that looks right and is a lower resolution than
+it claims. See [`skills/README.md`](https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve/blob/main/skills/README.md)
+for the other install routes (local folder, claude.ai upload) and for the MCP server, which
+exposes the same tool registry without the workflow guidance.
+
+## Citing process-improve
+
+If you use this package in academic work, please cite it. The
+[`CITATION.cff`](https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve/blob/main/CITATION.cff) file carries
+the current version and release date, and GitHub renders a *"Cite this repository"* button
+in the sidebar with ready-made BibTeX and APA entries:
+
+```bibtex
+@software{dunn_process_improve,
+  author  = {Dunn, Kevin G.},
+  title   = {{process-improve: Multivariate Analysis for Process Improvement}},
+  year    = {2026},
+  url     = {https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve}
+}
+```
+
+Add the `version` field from `CITATION.cff` (or the release tag you installed) when citing a
+specific version.
+
+## License
+
+MIT: see [LICENSE](https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve/blob/main/LICENSE) for details.
+
+## Contributing
+
+Bug reports, feature requests and pull requests are welcome. See
+[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) for
+development setup, testing and code style, and the
+[architecture overview](https://kgdunn.github.io/process-improve/architecture.html) for a map
+of the codebase. Bugs and feature requests go on the
+[issue tracker](https://github.com/kgdunn/process-improve/issues).