posthoganalytics 6.6.0__tar.gz → 6.7.0__tar.gz

{posthoganalytics-6.6.0/posthoganalytics.egg-info → posthoganalytics-6.7.0}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: posthoganalytics
-Version: 6.6.0
+Version: 6.7.0
 Summary: Integrate PostHog into any python application.
 Home-page: https://github.com/posthog/posthog-python
 Author: Posthog

{posthoganalytics-6.6.0 → posthoganalytics-6.7.0}/posthoganalytics/ai/anthropic/anthropic.py

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ except ImportError:
 
 import time
 import uuid
-from typing import Any, Dict, Optional, cast
+from typing import Any, Dict, Optional
 
 from posthoganalytics.ai.utils import (
     call_llm_and_track_usage,

{posthoganalytics-6.6.0 → posthoganalytics-6.7.0}/posthoganalytics/ai/openai/openai_async.py

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 import time
 import uuid
-from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional, cast
+from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional
 
 try:
     import openai

{posthoganalytics-6.6.0 → posthoganalytics-6.7.0}/posthoganalytics/client.py

@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ class Client(object):
                 only these flags will be evaluated, improving performance.
 
         Category:
-            Feature Flags
+            Feature flags
         """
         resp_data = self.get_flags_decision(
             distinct_id,
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ class Client(object):
             ```
 
         Category:
-            Feature Flags
+            Feature flags
         """
         resp_data = self.get_flags_decision(
             distinct_id,
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ class Client(object):
             ```
 
         Category:
-            Feature Flags
+            Feature flags
         """
         resp = self.get_flags_decision(
             distinct_id,
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ class Client(object):
             ```
 
         Category:
-            Feature Flags
+            Feature flags
         """
         groups = groups or {}
         person_properties = person_properties or {}
@@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ class Client(object):
             ```
 
         Category:
-            Feature Flags
+            Feature flags
         """
         if not self.personal_api_key:
             self.log.warning(
@@ -1204,6 +1204,9 @@ class Client(object):
         person_properties = person_properties or {}
         group_properties = group_properties or {}
 
+        # Create evaluation cache for flag dependencies
+        evaluation_cache: dict[str, Optional[FlagValue]] = {}
+
         if feature_flag.get("ensure_experience_continuity", False):
             raise InconclusiveMatchError("Flag has experience continuity enabled")
 
@@ -1237,11 +1240,20 @@ class Client(object):
 
             focused_group_properties = group_properties[group_name]
             return match_feature_flag_properties(
-                feature_flag, groups[group_name], focused_group_properties
+                feature_flag,
+                groups[group_name],
+                focused_group_properties,
+                self.feature_flags_by_key,
+                evaluation_cache,
             )
         else:
             return match_feature_flag_properties(
-                feature_flag, distinct_id, person_properties, self.cohorts
+                feature_flag,
+                distinct_id,
+                person_properties,
+                self.cohorts,
+                self.feature_flags_by_key,
+                evaluation_cache,
             )
 
     def feature_enabled(
@@ -1279,7 +1291,7 @@ class Client(object):
             ```
 
         Category:
-            Feature Flags
+            Feature flags
         """
         response = self.get_feature_flag(
             key,
@@ -1487,7 +1499,7 @@ class Client(object):
             ```
 
         Category:
-            Feature Flags
+            Feature flags
         """
         feature_flag_result = self.get_feature_flag_result(
             key,
@@ -1577,7 +1589,7 @@ class Client(object):
             ```
 
         Category:
-            Feature Flags
+            Feature flags
         """
         feature_flag_result = self._get_feature_flag_result(
             key,
@@ -1747,7 +1759,7 @@ class Client(object):
             ```
 
         Category:
-            Feature Flags
+            Feature flags
         """
         response = self.get_all_flags_and_payloads(
             distinct_id,
@@ -1791,7 +1803,7 @@ class Client(object):
             ```
 
         Category:
-            Feature Flags
+            Feature flags
         """
         if self.disabled:
             return {"featureFlags": None, "featureFlagPayloads": None}
@@ -1997,7 +2009,7 @@ class Client(object):
             for group_name in groups:
                 all_group_properties[group_name] = {
                     "$group_key": groups[group_name],
-                    **(group_properties.get(group_name) or {}),
+                    **((group_properties or {}).get(group_name) or {}),
                 }
 
         return all_person_properties, all_group_properties

{posthoganalytics-6.6.0 → posthoganalytics-6.7.0}/posthoganalytics/feature_flags.py

@@ -55,8 +55,161 @@ def variant_lookup_table(feature_flag):
     return lookup_table
 
 
+def evaluate_flag_dependency(
+    property, flags_by_key, evaluation_cache, distinct_id, properties, cohort_properties
+):
+    """
+    Evaluate a flag dependency property according to the dependency chain algorithm.
+
+    Args:
+        property: Flag property with type="flag" and dependency_chain
+        flags_by_key: Dictionary of all flags by their key
+        evaluation_cache: Cache for storing evaluation results
+        distinct_id: The distinct ID being evaluated
+        properties: Person properties for evaluation
+        cohort_properties: Cohort properties for evaluation
+
+    Returns:
+        bool: True if all dependencies in the chain evaluate to True, False otherwise
+    """
+    if flags_by_key is None or evaluation_cache is None:
+        # Cannot evaluate flag dependencies without required context
+        raise InconclusiveMatchError(
+            f"Cannot evaluate flag dependency on '{property.get('key', 'unknown')}' without flags_by_key and evaluation_cache"
+        )
+
+    # Check if dependency_chain is present - it should always be provided for flag dependencies
+    if "dependency_chain" not in property:
+        # Missing dependency_chain indicates malformed server data
+        raise InconclusiveMatchError(
+            f"Flag dependency property for '{property.get('key', 'unknown')}' is missing required 'dependency_chain' field"
+        )
+
+    dependency_chain = property["dependency_chain"]
+
+    # Handle circular dependency (empty chain means circular)
+    if len(dependency_chain) == 0:
+        log.debug(f"Circular dependency detected for flag: {property.get('key')}")
+        raise InconclusiveMatchError(
+            f"Circular dependency detected for flag '{property.get('key', 'unknown')}'"
+        )
+
+    # Evaluate all dependencies in the chain order
+    for dep_flag_key in dependency_chain:
+        if dep_flag_key not in evaluation_cache:
+            # Need to evaluate this dependency first
+            dep_flag = flags_by_key.get(dep_flag_key)
+            if not dep_flag:
+                # Missing flag dependency - cannot evaluate locally
+                evaluation_cache[dep_flag_key] = None
+                raise InconclusiveMatchError(
+                    f"Cannot evaluate flag dependency '{dep_flag_key}' - flag not found in local flags"
+                )
+            else:
+                # Check if the flag is active (same check as in client._compute_flag_locally)
+                if not dep_flag.get("active"):
+                    evaluation_cache[dep_flag_key] = False
+                else:
+                    # Recursively evaluate the dependency
+                    try:
+                        dep_result = match_feature_flag_properties(
+                            dep_flag,
+                            distinct_id,
+                            properties,
+                            cohort_properties,
+                            flags_by_key,
+                            evaluation_cache,
+                        )
+                        evaluation_cache[dep_flag_key] = dep_result
+                    except InconclusiveMatchError as e:
+                        # If we can't evaluate a dependency, store None and propagate the error
+                        evaluation_cache[dep_flag_key] = None
+                        raise InconclusiveMatchError(
+                            f"Cannot evaluate flag dependency '{dep_flag_key}': {e}"
+                        ) from e
+
+        # Check the cached result
+        cached_result = evaluation_cache[dep_flag_key]
+        if cached_result is None:
+            # Previously inconclusive - raise error again
+            raise InconclusiveMatchError(
+                f"Flag dependency '{dep_flag_key}' was previously inconclusive"
+            )
+        elif not cached_result:
+            # Definitive False result - dependency failed
+            return False
+
+    # All dependencies in the chain have been evaluated successfully
+    # Now check if the final flag value matches the expected value in the property
+    flag_key = property.get("key")
+    expected_value = property.get("value")
+    operator = property.get("operator", "exact")
+
+    if flag_key and expected_value is not None:
+        # Get the actual value of the flag we're checking
+        actual_value = evaluation_cache.get(flag_key)
+
+        if actual_value is None:
+            # Flag wasn't evaluated - this shouldn't happen if dependency chain is correct
+            raise InconclusiveMatchError(
+                f"Flag '{flag_key}' was not evaluated despite being in dependency chain"
+            )
+
+        # For flag dependencies, we need to compare the actual flag result with expected value
+        # using the flag_evaluates_to operator logic
+        if operator == "flag_evaluates_to":
+            return matches_dependency_value(expected_value, actual_value)
+        else:
+            # This should never happen, but just to be defensive.
+            raise InconclusiveMatchError(
+                f"Flag dependency property for '{property.get('key', 'unknown')}' has invalid operator '{operator}'"
+            )
+
+    # If no value check needed, return True (all dependencies passed)
+    return True
+
+
+def matches_dependency_value(expected_value, actual_value):
+    """
+    Check if the actual flag value matches the expected dependency value.
+
+    This follows the same logic as the C# MatchesDependencyValue function:
+    - String variant case: check for exact match or boolean true
+    - Boolean case: must match expected boolean value
+
+    Args:
+        expected_value: The expected value from the property
+        actual_value: The actual value returned by the flag evaluation
+
+    Returns:
+        bool: True if the values match according to flag dependency rules
+    """
+    # String variant case - check for exact match or boolean true
+    if isinstance(actual_value, str) and len(actual_value) > 0:
+        if isinstance(expected_value, bool):
+            # Any variant matches boolean true
+            return expected_value
+        elif isinstance(expected_value, str):
+            # variants are case-sensitive, hence our comparison is too
+            return actual_value == expected_value
+        else:
+            return False
+
+    # Boolean case - must match expected boolean value
+    elif isinstance(actual_value, bool) and isinstance(expected_value, bool):
+        return actual_value == expected_value
+
+    # Default case
+    return False
+
+
 def match_feature_flag_properties(
-    flag, distinct_id, properties, cohort_properties=None
+    flag,
+    distinct_id,
+    properties,
+    cohort_properties=None,
+    flags_by_key=None,
+    evaluation_cache=None,
 ) -> FlagValue:
     flag_conditions = (flag.get("filters") or {}).get("groups") or []
     is_inconclusive = False
@@ -79,7 +232,13 @@ def match_feature_flag_properties(
             # if any one condition resolves to True, we can shortcircuit and return
             # the matching variant
             if is_condition_match(
-                flag, distinct_id, condition, properties, cohort_properties
+                flag,
+                distinct_id,
+                condition,
+                properties,
+                cohort_properties,
+                flags_by_key,
+                evaluation_cache,
             ):
                 variant_override = condition.get("variant")
                 if variant_override and variant_override in valid_variant_keys:
@@ -101,22 +260,36 @@ def match_feature_flag_properties(
 
 
 def is_condition_match(
-    feature_flag, distinct_id, condition, properties, cohort_properties
+    feature_flag,
+    distinct_id,
+    condition,
+    properties,
+    cohort_properties,
+    flags_by_key=None,
+    evaluation_cache=None,
 ) -> bool:
     rollout_percentage = condition.get("rollout_percentage")
     if len(condition.get("properties") or []) > 0:
         for prop in condition.get("properties"):
             property_type = prop.get("type")
             if property_type == "cohort":
-                matches = match_cohort(prop, properties, cohort_properties)
+                matches = match_cohort(
+                    prop,
+                    properties,
+                    cohort_properties,
+                    flags_by_key,
+                    evaluation_cache,
+                    distinct_id,
+                )
             elif property_type == "flag":
-                log.warning(
-                    "Flag dependency filters are not supported in local evaluation. "
-                    "Skipping condition for flag '%s' with dependency on flag '%s'",
-                    feature_flag.get("key", "unknown"),
-                    prop.get("key", "unknown"),
+                matches = evaluate_flag_dependency(
+                    prop,
+                    flags_by_key,
+                    evaluation_cache,
+                    distinct_id,
+                    properties,
+                    cohort_properties,
                 )
-                continue
             else:
                 matches = match_property(prop, properties)
             if not matches:
@@ -264,7 +437,14 @@ def match_property(property, property_values) -> bool:
     raise InconclusiveMatchError(f"Unknown operator {operator}")
 
 
-def match_cohort(property, property_values, cohort_properties) -> bool:
+def match_cohort(
+    property,
+    property_values,
+    cohort_properties,
+    flags_by_key=None,
+    evaluation_cache=None,
+    distinct_id=None,
+) -> bool:
     # Cohort properties are in the form of property groups like this:
     # {
     #     "cohort_id": {
@@ -281,10 +461,24 @@ def match_cohort(property, property_values, cohort_properties) -> bool:
         )
 
     property_group = cohort_properties[cohort_id]
-    return match_property_group(property_group, property_values, cohort_properties)
+    return match_property_group(
+        property_group,
+        property_values,
+        cohort_properties,
+        flags_by_key,
+        evaluation_cache,
+        distinct_id,
+    )
 
 
-def match_property_group(property_group, property_values, cohort_properties) -> bool:
+def match_property_group(
+    property_group,
+    property_values,
+    cohort_properties,
+    flags_by_key=None,
+    evaluation_cache=None,
+    distinct_id=None,
+) -> bool:
     if not property_group:
         return True
 
@@ -301,7 +495,14 @@ def match_property_group(property_group, property_values, cohort_properties) ->
         # a nested property group
         for prop in properties:
             try:
-                matches = match_property_group(prop, property_values, cohort_properties)
+                matches = match_property_group(
+                    prop,
+                    property_values,
+                    cohort_properties,
+                    flags_by_key,
+                    evaluation_cache,
+                    distinct_id,
+                )
                 if property_group_type == "AND":
                     if not matches:
                         return False
@@ -324,14 +525,23 @@ def match_property_group(property_group, property_values, cohort_properties) ->
         for prop in properties:
             try:
                 if prop.get("type") == "cohort":
-                    matches = match_cohort(prop, property_values, cohort_properties)
+                    matches = match_cohort(
+                        prop,
+                        property_values,
+                        cohort_properties,
+                        flags_by_key,
+                        evaluation_cache,
+                        distinct_id,
+                    )
                 elif prop.get("type") == "flag":
-                    log.warning(
-                        "Flag dependency filters are not supported in local evaluation. "
-                        "Skipping condition with dependency on flag '%s'",
-                        prop.get("key", "unknown"),
+                    matches = evaluate_flag_dependency(
+                        prop,
+                        flags_by_key,
+                        evaluation_cache,
+                        distinct_id,
+                        property_values,
+                        cohort_properties,
                     )
-                    continue
                 else:
                     matches = match_property(prop, property_values)