phocinae-rulepack 0.1.0__tar.gz

phocinae_rulepack-0.1.0/LICENSE

@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+                                 Apache License
+                           Version 2.0, January 2004
+                        http://www.apache.org/licenses/
+
+   TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
+
+   1. Definitions.
+
+      "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
+      and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
+
+      "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
+      the copyright owner that is granting the License.
+
+      "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
+      other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
+      control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
+      "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
+      direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
+      otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
+      outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
+
+      "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
+      exercising permissions granted by this License.
+
+      "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
+      including but not limited to software source code, documentation
+      source, and configuration files.
+
+      "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
+      transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
+      not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
+      and conversions to other media types.
+
+      "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
+      Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
+      copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
+      (an example is provided in the Appendix below).
+
+      "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
+      form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
+      editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
+      represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
+      of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
+      separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
+      the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
+
+      "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
+      the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
+      to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
+      submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
+      or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
+      the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
+      means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
+      to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
+      communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
+      and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
+      Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
+      excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
+      designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
+
+      "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
+      on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
+      subsequently incorporated within the Work.
+
+   2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
+      this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
+      worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
+      copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
+      publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
+      Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
+
+   3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
+      this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
+      worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
+      (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
+      use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
+      where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
+      by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
+      Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
+      with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
+      institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
+      cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
+      or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
+      or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
+      granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
+      as of the date such litigation is filed.
+
+   4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
+      Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
+      modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
+      meet the following conditions:
+
+      (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
+          Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
+
+      (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
+          stating that You changed the files; and
+
+      (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
+          that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
+          attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
+          excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
+          the Derivative Works; and
+
+      (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
+          distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
+          include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
+          within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
+          pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
+          of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
+          as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
+          documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
+          within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
+          wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
+          of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
+          do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
+          notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
+          or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
+          that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
+          as modifying the License.
+
+      You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
+      may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
+      for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
+      for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
+      reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
+      the conditions stated in this License.
+
+   5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
+      any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
+      by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
+      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
+      Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
+      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
+      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
+
+   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
+      names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
+      except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
+      origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
+
+   7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
+      agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
+      Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+      WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
+      implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
+      of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
+      PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
+      appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
+      risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
+
+   8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
+      whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
+      unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
+      negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
+      liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
+      incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
+      result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
+      Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
+      work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
+      other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
+      has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
+
+   9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
+      the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
+      and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
+      or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
+      License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
+      on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
+      of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
+      defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
+      incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
+      of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
+
+   END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
+
+   APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
+
+      To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
+      boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
+      replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
+      the brackets!)  The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
+      comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
+      file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
+      same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
+      identification within third-party archives.
+
+   Copyright 2026 phocinae-guard authors (Nous Research)
+
+   Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+   you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+   You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+   limitations under the License.

phocinae_rulepack-0.1.0/PKG-INFO

@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+Metadata-Version: 2.4
+Name: phocinae-rulepack
+Version: 0.1.0
+Summary: Deterministic rule-pack engine: read a ledger, apply a versioned rule pack, emit only the differences for human review. Zero model calls, zero third-party runtime dependencies.
+Author: Phocinae
+License: Apache-2.0
+Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/Phocinae/phocinae-rulepack
+Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/Phocinae/phocinae-rulepack
+Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/Phocinae/phocinae-rulepack/issues
+Keywords: rule-engine,deterministic,compliance,checklist,fail-closed,decision-model,phocinae,local-first
+Classifier: Development Status :: 3 - Alpha
+Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
+Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.9
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.10
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
+Classifier: Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance
+Requires-Python: >=3.9
+Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
+License-File: LICENSE
+Provides-Extra: yamltest
+Requires-Dist: PyYAML>=6.0; extra == "yamltest"
+Dynamic: license-file
+
+# phocinae-rulepack
+
+**Read a ledger, apply one version of a rule pack, and emit only the differences
+for a human to review.** Zero model calls. Zero third-party runtime dependencies.
+
+<p>
+  <img alt="python" src="https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=python&message=%3E%3D3.9&color=3776AB&style=flat-square">
+  <img alt="deps" src="https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=runtime%20deps&message=0&color=success&style=flat-square">
+  <img alt="model calls" src="https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=model%20calls&message=0&color=blueviolet&style=flat-square">
+  <img alt="License" src="https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=License&message=Apache-2.0&color=blue&style=flat-square">
+</p>
+
+[中文](./README-zh.md)
+
+---
+
+## Why this exists, in one measurement
+
+The same decision model, asked the same question two ways, scored like this on 53
+labelled commands:
+
+| how the question was asked | recall on destructive commands |
+|---|---|
+| "Should this be blocked?" (boolean) | **0.00** — it passed all 31 |
+| allow / ask / deny (three-way) | 0.74 |
+| harmless / risky / destructive (scale) | 0.97 |
+
+And on a policy-check battery of 14 claims, the **rule kernel scored 14/14 with
+zero model calls**, while the same model, asked to approve or reject the claims
+directly, rejected **all 8** compliant ones.
+
+The conclusion this package is built on: *"the rule kernel is worth shipping as a
+deterministic plugin that uses no model at all."* This is that kernel.
+
+If you want the measurement harness rather than the kernel, see
+[`phocinae-formulate`](https://github.com/Phocinae/phocinae-formulate).
+
+## Install
+
+```sh
+pip install phocinae-rulepack==0.1.0
+```
+
+Python 3.9 or newer. No dependencies. Nothing in this package opens a socket.
+
+## Use
+
+```sh
+# validate a pack: schema, citation text, corpus hashes
+phocinae-rulepack validate expense-policy
+
+# run one document (JSON or YAML; '-' reads stdin)
+phocinae-rulepack check expense-policy claim.json
+
+# run a ledger and get one envelope
+phocinae-rulepack check expense-policy ledger.json --format json
+
+# what ships in the box
+phocinae-rulepack list --packs-dir ./packs
+```
+
+Exit codes are the contract:
+
+| code | meaning |
+|---|---|
+| `0` | every result is `pass` |
+| `1` | at least one `fail` |
+| `2` | no `fail`, but at least one `review` (grey zone → a human decides) |
+| `3` | usage or configuration error, **or an empty scan** |
+
+Priority is fixed and total: `3 > 1 > 2 > 0`.
+
+## The three-state result
+
+```json
+{"rulepack":"expense-policy","verdict":"fail","model_calls":0,
+ "reasons":[{"rule":"r2_meal_cap","verdict":"fail","reason_code":"OVER_CATEGORY_CAP",
+             "cite":["c2","c4"],"evidence":"matched:r2_meal_cap"}],
+ "unmatched_paths":["id"]}
+```
+
+* **`review` means a human decides.** It is not "look again later".
+* **`pass` requires a rule that says pass.** A document no rule matched is
+  `review` (`NO_RULE_MATCHED`) — nothing falls through to a silent allow.
+* **A missing field or a wrongly-typed field never becomes `pass`.** Missing
+  fields are `review`; they are never treated as compliance.
+* **A real violation outranks a missing field.** If one rule finds a breach and
+  another cannot be evaluated, the verdict is `fail` and both are reported.
+* **`model_calls` is a real counter, and it is always `0`.**
+
+## The evidence model is the point
+
+A rule is only as good as the text behind it, so a citation must say where its
+text came from and whether anyone has actually read the instrument:
+
+| `evidence_level` | meaning | can it `fail` something? |
+|---|---|---|
+| `verbatim` | the quote appears character-for-character in the corpus | yes |
+| `derived` | an authority's restatement, not the instrument's own words | yes, with a warning |
+| `unavailable` | the instrument text was **not obtained** | **no — the verdict is capped to `review`** |
+
+That cap is the difference between an honest tool and a fake gate. A rule whose
+basis nobody has read must not be able to reject a customer's paperwork. The cap
+is verified in both directions by the test suite: flip the citation to `derived`
+and the same input must move from `review` to `fail`.
+
+`validate` resolves every quote against the corpus and recomputes every
+sha256. A one-character change to a quote, or a wrong hash, fails validation.
+`--strict` additionally rejects sample corpus and `unavailable` citations.
+
+## Writing a pack
+
+```yaml
+schema: phocinae-rulepack/v1
+id: my-check
+title: What this checks
+version: 0.1.0
+missing_field_policy: review        # only 'review' is accepted in v1
+corpus:
+  - path: sources/spec.txt
+    role: authority                  # authority | production | sample
+    sha256: <64 uppercase hex>
+citations:
+  - id: c1
+    source: Where the text is from
+    locator: clause 4.2
+    quote: "the exact words, character for character"
+    document: sources/spec.txt
+    evidence_level: verbatim
+rules:
+  - id: r1_limit
+    when:
+      all_of:
+        - {field: amount, op: ">", value: 500}
+        - {field: receipt, op: "==", value: false}
+    then: {verdict: fail, reason_code: OVER_LIMIT, cite: [c1]}
+    require_fields: [amount, receipt]
+```
+
+The expression language is deliberately small: `field OP value` combined with
+`all_of` / `any_of` / `not`, and a `value` may be `{"ref": "other.field"}` to
+compare two fields. Operators: `== != < <= > >= in not_in matches exists missing`.
+
+There is **no** arithmetic, no custom function, no loop, and no network access.
+If you need a computed value, compute it in the adapter that builds the input
+document — that keeps the judgement criterion in the pack, where it can be cited
+and tested.
+
+### The two YAML traps worth knowing
+
+Both of these parse into something plausible and wrong, which is why the loader
+raises instead of guessing:
+
+```yaml
+op: >            # WRONG: a folded block scalar. It swallows the lines below.
+op: ">"          # right: quote operators
+
+note: text with a ": " colon inside    # WRONG: YAML wants a new key there
+note: "text with a \": \" colon inside"  # right: quote it, or use a block scalar
+```
+
+## What ships
+
+| pack | scenario | rules |
+|---|---|---|
+| `expense-policy` | S15 (the expense pre-approval demo) | 8 |
+
+> Naming note: "S15" here is the gallery's S15 expense demo. In the 182-scenario
+> inventory S15 is something else (multilingual low-resource expansion).
+
+## Testing
+
+```sh
+python tests/run_all.py
+```
+
+No network, no model, no third-party packages. The suite exits non-zero when
+zero assertions ran — *"a check with nothing to check must not report success"*
+is the same rule the engine applies to an empty scan.
+
+Tests never use `tempfile`: scratch goes to `$PHOCINAE_RULEPACK_TMP`, or to a
+directory beside the repository.
+
+## What this is not
+
+It is not a compliance, legal, medical or financial conclusion. It reports
+differences for a human to review. It is not a model, and it does not call one.
+
+## License
+
+Apache-2.0.

phocinae_rulepack-0.1.0/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+# phocinae-rulepack
+
+**Read a ledger, apply one version of a rule pack, and emit only the differences
+for a human to review.** Zero model calls. Zero third-party runtime dependencies.
+
+<p>
+  <img alt="python" src="https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=python&message=%3E%3D3.9&color=3776AB&style=flat-square">
+  <img alt="deps" src="https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=runtime%20deps&message=0&color=success&style=flat-square">
+  <img alt="model calls" src="https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=model%20calls&message=0&color=blueviolet&style=flat-square">
+  <img alt="License" src="https://img.shields.io/static/v1?label=License&message=Apache-2.0&color=blue&style=flat-square">
+</p>
+
+[中文](./README-zh.md)
+
+---
+
+## Why this exists, in one measurement
+
+The same decision model, asked the same question two ways, scored like this on 53
+labelled commands:
+
+| how the question was asked | recall on destructive commands |
+|---|---|
+| "Should this be blocked?" (boolean) | **0.00** — it passed all 31 |
+| allow / ask / deny (three-way) | 0.74 |
+| harmless / risky / destructive (scale) | 0.97 |
+
+And on a policy-check battery of 14 claims, the **rule kernel scored 14/14 with
+zero model calls**, while the same model, asked to approve or reject the claims
+directly, rejected **all 8** compliant ones.
+
+The conclusion this package is built on: *"the rule kernel is worth shipping as a
+deterministic plugin that uses no model at all."* This is that kernel.
+
+If you want the measurement harness rather than the kernel, see
+[`phocinae-formulate`](https://github.com/Phocinae/phocinae-formulate).
+
+## Install
+
+```sh
+pip install phocinae-rulepack==0.1.0
+```
+
+Python 3.9 or newer. No dependencies. Nothing in this package opens a socket.
+
+## Use
+
+```sh
+# validate a pack: schema, citation text, corpus hashes
+phocinae-rulepack validate expense-policy
+
+# run one document (JSON or YAML; '-' reads stdin)
+phocinae-rulepack check expense-policy claim.json
+
+# run a ledger and get one envelope
+phocinae-rulepack check expense-policy ledger.json --format json
+
+# what ships in the box
+phocinae-rulepack list --packs-dir ./packs
+```
+
+Exit codes are the contract:
+
+| code | meaning |
+|---|---|
+| `0` | every result is `pass` |
+| `1` | at least one `fail` |
+| `2` | no `fail`, but at least one `review` (grey zone → a human decides) |
+| `3` | usage or configuration error, **or an empty scan** |
+
+Priority is fixed and total: `3 > 1 > 2 > 0`.
+
+## The three-state result
+
+```json
+{"rulepack":"expense-policy","verdict":"fail","model_calls":0,
+ "reasons":[{"rule":"r2_meal_cap","verdict":"fail","reason_code":"OVER_CATEGORY_CAP",
+             "cite":["c2","c4"],"evidence":"matched:r2_meal_cap"}],
+ "unmatched_paths":["id"]}
+```
+
+* **`review` means a human decides.** It is not "look again later".
+* **`pass` requires a rule that says pass.** A document no rule matched is
+  `review` (`NO_RULE_MATCHED`) — nothing falls through to a silent allow.
+* **A missing field or a wrongly-typed field never becomes `pass`.** Missing
+  fields are `review`; they are never treated as compliance.
+* **A real violation outranks a missing field.** If one rule finds a breach and
+  another cannot be evaluated, the verdict is `fail` and both are reported.
+* **`model_calls` is a real counter, and it is always `0`.**
+
+## The evidence model is the point
+
+A rule is only as good as the text behind it, so a citation must say where its
+text came from and whether anyone has actually read the instrument:
+
+| `evidence_level` | meaning | can it `fail` something? |
+|---|---|---|
+| `verbatim` | the quote appears character-for-character in the corpus | yes |
+| `derived` | an authority's restatement, not the instrument's own words | yes, with a warning |
+| `unavailable` | the instrument text was **not obtained** | **no — the verdict is capped to `review`** |
+
+That cap is the difference between an honest tool and a fake gate. A rule whose
+basis nobody has read must not be able to reject a customer's paperwork. The cap
+is verified in both directions by the test suite: flip the citation to `derived`
+and the same input must move from `review` to `fail`.
+
+`validate` resolves every quote against the corpus and recomputes every
+sha256. A one-character change to a quote, or a wrong hash, fails validation.
+`--strict` additionally rejects sample corpus and `unavailable` citations.
+
+## Writing a pack
+
+```yaml
+schema: phocinae-rulepack/v1
+id: my-check
+title: What this checks
+version: 0.1.0
+missing_field_policy: review        # only 'review' is accepted in v1
+corpus:
+  - path: sources/spec.txt
+    role: authority                  # authority | production | sample
+    sha256: <64 uppercase hex>
+citations:
+  - id: c1
+    source: Where the text is from
+    locator: clause 4.2
+    quote: "the exact words, character for character"
+    document: sources/spec.txt
+    evidence_level: verbatim
+rules:
+  - id: r1_limit
+    when:
+      all_of:
+        - {field: amount, op: ">", value: 500}
+        - {field: receipt, op: "==", value: false}
+    then: {verdict: fail, reason_code: OVER_LIMIT, cite: [c1]}
+    require_fields: [amount, receipt]
+```
+
+The expression language is deliberately small: `field OP value` combined with
+`all_of` / `any_of` / `not`, and a `value` may be `{"ref": "other.field"}` to
+compare two fields. Operators: `== != < <= > >= in not_in matches exists missing`.
+
+There is **no** arithmetic, no custom function, no loop, and no network access.
+If you need a computed value, compute it in the adapter that builds the input
+document — that keeps the judgement criterion in the pack, where it can be cited
+and tested.
+
+### The two YAML traps worth knowing
+
+Both of these parse into something plausible and wrong, which is why the loader
+raises instead of guessing:
+
+```yaml
+op: >            # WRONG: a folded block scalar. It swallows the lines below.
+op: ">"          # right: quote operators
+
+note: text with a ": " colon inside    # WRONG: YAML wants a new key there
+note: "text with a \": \" colon inside"  # right: quote it, or use a block scalar
+```
+
+## What ships
+
+| pack | scenario | rules |
+|---|---|---|
+| `expense-policy` | S15 (the expense pre-approval demo) | 8 |
+
+> Naming note: "S15" here is the gallery's S15 expense demo. In the 182-scenario
+> inventory S15 is something else (multilingual low-resource expansion).
+
+## Testing
+
+```sh
+python tests/run_all.py
+```
+
+No network, no model, no third-party packages. The suite exits non-zero when
+zero assertions ran — *"a check with nothing to check must not report success"*
+is the same rule the engine applies to an empty scan.
+
+Tests never use `tempfile`: scratch goes to `$PHOCINAE_RULEPACK_TMP`, or to a
+directory beside the repository.
+
+## What this is not
+
+It is not a compliance, legal, medical or financial conclusion. It reports
+differences for a human to review. It is not a model, and it does not call one.
+
+## License
+
+Apache-2.0.

phocinae_rulepack-0.1.0/phocinae_rulepack/__init__.py

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+"""phocinae-rulepack — deterministic rule-pack engine.
+
+Read a ledger, apply a versioned rule pack, emit only the differences for human
+review. Zero model calls, zero third-party runtime dependencies.
+
+Design contract (see the project's design document, section 2):
+  * three-state verdict: pass / fail / review
+  * `review` is the grey-zone escalation to a human, not "look again later"
+  * a missing field or an unmatched rule NEVER defaults to `pass` (fail-closed)
+  * `model_calls` is a real counter and is always 0 here
+  * an empty scan is a FAILURE, not a success
+  * the same input produces byte-identical output
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from .errors import (
+    PackError,
+    EXIT_PASS,
+    EXIT_FAIL,
+    EXIT_REVIEW,
+    EXIT_USAGE,
+    EXIT_CODES,
+    exit_code,
+    exit_code_for_reason,
+)
+from .schema import Citation, Pack, Rule, load_pack, validate_pack, ValidationReport
+from .engine import check, check_many, dump_canonical
+
+__version__ = "0.1.0"
+
+#: Verdict vocabulary. Ordered by strictness so aggregation is a max().
+VERDICTS = ("pass", "review", "fail")
+
+__all__ = [
+    "__version__",
+    "VERDICTS",
+    # errors / exit codes
+    "PackError",
+    "EXIT_PASS",
+    "EXIT_FAIL",
+    "EXIT_REVIEW",
+    "EXIT_USAGE",
+    "EXIT_CODES",
+    "exit_code",
+    "exit_code_for_reason",
+    # data model
+    "Citation",
+    "Pack",
+    "Rule",
+    "ValidationReport",
+    "load_pack",
+    "validate_pack",
+    # engine
+    "check",
+    "check_many",
+    "dump_canonical",
+]

phocinae_rulepack-0.1.0/phocinae_rulepack/__main__.py

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+"""``python -m phocinae_rulepack`` entry point."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import sys
+
+from .cli import main
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    sys.exit(main())