pandas-match-recognize 0.1.0__tar.gz

pandas_match_recognize-0.1.0/.gitignore

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+# Byte-compiled / optimized / DLL files
+__pycache__/
+*.py[cod]
+*$py.class
+
+# C extensions
+*.so
+
+# Distribution / packaging
+.Python
+build/
+develop-eggs/
+dist/
+downloads/
+eggs/
+.eggs/
+lib/
+lib64/
+parts/
+sdist/
+var/
+wheels/
+pip-wheel-metadata/
+share/python-wheels/
+*.egg-info/
+.installed.cfg
+*.egg
+MANIFEST
+
+# PyInstaller
+#  Usually these files are written by a python script from a template
+#  before PyInstaller builds the exe, so as to inject date/other infos into it.
+*.manifest
+*.spec
+
+# Installer logs
+pip-log.txt
+pip-delete-this-directory.txt
+
+# Unit test / coverage reports
+htmlcov/
+.tox/
+.nox/
+.coverage
+.coverage.*
+.cache
+nosetests.xml
+coverage.xml
+*.cover
+*.py,cover
+.hypothesis/
+.pytest_cache/
+
+# Jupyter Notebook
+.ipynb_checkpoints
+
+# IPython
+profile_default/
+ipython_config.py
+
+# pyenv
+.python-version
+
+# pipenv
+#   According to pypa/pipenv#598, it is recommended to include Pipfile.lock in version control.
+#   However, in case of collaboration, if having platform-specific dependencies or dependencies
+#   having no cross-platform support, pipenv may install dependencies that don't work, or not
+#   install all needed dependencies.
+#Pipfile.lock
+
+# PEP 582; used by e.g. github.com/David-OConnor/pyflow
+__pypackages__/
+
+# Celery stuff
+celerybeat-schedule
+celerybeat.pid
+
+# SageMath parsed files
+*.sage.py
+
+# Environments
+.env
+.venv
+env/
+venv/
+ENV/
+env.bak/
+venv.bak/
+
+# Spyder project settings
+.spyderproject
+.spyproject
+
+# Rope project settings
+.ropeproject
+
+# mkdocs documentation
+/site
+
+# mypy
+.mypy_cache/
+.dmypy.json
+dmypy.json
+
+# Pyre type checker
+.pyre/
+
+# IDE
+.vscode/
+.idea/
+*.swp
+*.swo
+*~
+
+# OS
+.DS_Store
+Thumbs.db
+
+# Project specific
+*.log
+temp/
+tmp/

pandas_match_recognize-0.1.0/.vscode/settings.json

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+{
+    "CodeGPT.apiKey": "CodeGPT Plus Beta"
+}

pandas_match_recognize-0.1.0/1.swift

@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+1. SQL Parser Module (Using a Parser Generator)
+
+// Define full MATCH_RECOGNIZE grammar (using ANTLR, for example)
+// Grammar covers:
+//   - PARTITION BY clause (list of columns)
+//   - ORDER BY clause (column names with ASC/DESC)
+//   - MEASURES clause (list of measure expressions)
+//   - PATTERN clause (row pattern with operators: concatenation, alternation, grouping, quantifiers, exclusions)
+//   - SUBSET clause (mapping subset names to list of pattern variables)
+//   - DEFINE clause (list of variable definitions with expressions)
+//   - AFTER MATCH SKIP clause (options: PAST LAST ROW, TO FIRST <var>, TO LAST <var>)
+
+SQL MATCH_RECOGNIZE
+    PARTITION BY <column_list>
+    ORDER BY <column_list>
+    MEASURES <measure_list>
+    PATTERN (<pattern>)
+    DEFINE <variable_definitions>
+    SUBSET <subset_mapping>
+    AFTER MATCH SKIP <skip_option>
+
+---    
+AST Generation: Occurs immediately after parsing during the transformation phase.
+Notes:
+– The AST should capture every clause as a node.
+– It must resolve subset expansions (e.g. if SUBSET U = (A, B), then any occurrence of U in PATTERN is replaced with (A | B)).
+
+Parsing MATCH_RECOGNIZE Queries (Extract all components)
+Validating MATCH_RECOGNIZE Queries (Check for missing parts, syntax errors)
+Transforming MATCH_RECOGNIZE Queries (Rewrite patterns, optimize SQL)
+✔ Extracted all MATCH_RECOGNIZE components
+✔ Validated MATCH_RECOGNIZE queries for correctness
+✔ Transformed MATCH_RECOGNIZE patterns
+
+
+✅ 1. Extract MATCH_RECOGNIZE Components (PARTITION, MEASURES, PATTERN, DEFINE, SUBSET)
+✅ 2. Validate MATCH_RECOGNIZE Queries (Check for missing parts, errors)
+✅ 3. Transform MATCH_RECOGNIZE Queries (Modify, optimize, or rewrite queries)
+✔ Extracted all MATCH_RECOGNIZE components
+✔ Validated MATCH_RECOGNIZE queries for correctness
+✔ Transformed MATCH_RECOGNIZE patterns to optimize queries
+
+complex pattern transformations? 
+Generating optimized MATCH_RECOGNIZE queries dynamically?
+
+A full-fledged expression parser that produces a detailed sub-AST.
+A more advanced, structured AST for row patterns (handling full regex-like syntax).
+Automatic subset expansion in the AST.
+Complex pattern transformations and dynamic query optimization.
+Deeper semantic validation of expressions and function calls.
+Replace the stub expression parser with a fully featured parser if your expression syntax is complex.
+Expand the pattern parser to cover more regex-like constructs.
+Write comprehensive unit and integration tests to cover edge cases in expressions and patterns.
+Add semantic validation logic for checking column existence, data type matching, and function support (which might require integration with your schema metadata).
+
+
+
+
+
+NFA/DFA generation for efficient pattern matching (execution phase).
+
+vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
+
+
+NFA/DFA Generation: Happens during the execution phase (in the engine module) when the canonical row pattern is compiled into a state machine for efficient matching.
+
+function parseSQL(query: String) -> AST
+    // Use a parser generator (e.g., ANTLR) to create a parse tree from query.
+    ast = generateAST(query)
+    validateAST(ast) // e.g., check that every pattern variable in PATTERN has a definition
+    return ast
+
+Walking the Parse Tree
+If you want to extract information (e.g., table names, column names, patterns), you can use a Listener or Visitor:
+Validating Queries
+
+Now that the query is successfully parsed, you can build a SQL validation or transformation tool based on the tree.
+custom query validation, rewriting, or analysis
+
+NFA/DFA Generation
+
+State Machine Construction:
+The process of compiling the canonical row pattern (from the AST) into a nondeterministic or deterministic finite automaton for efficient execution is planned for the engine module and has not been implemented in the current phase.
+
+
+
+2. Expression Evaluator Module
+// The expression evaluator handles both boolean and arithmetic expressions.
+// It supports navigation functions such as PREV(), NEXT(), FIRST(), LAST().
+// It converts the expression into an Intermediate Representation (IR) for efficient repeated evaluation.
+
+function compileExpression(expr: String) -> ExpressionIR
+    // Parse the expression using a recursive descent parser or a tool like ANTLR.
+    // Build an IR (e.g., an abstract syntax tree) that represents the expression.
+    ir = parseAndBuildIR(expr)
+    return ir
+
+function evaluateExpression(ir: ExpressionIR, context: Map<String, Any>) -> Any
+    // Recursively evaluate the IR using context (which might include:
+    //   - The current row
+    //   - The entire match (for FINAL semantics)
+    //   - Pattern variable-specific row lists)
+    // Example: If the IR represents PREV(A.price, 2), use context to look up the 2nd previous row for variable A.
+    if ir is ConstantNode:
+        return ir.value
+    else if ir is VariableNode:
+        return context[ir.name]
+    else if ir is BinaryOpNode:
+        left = evaluateExpression(ir.left, context)
+        right = evaluateExpression(ir.right, context)
+        return applyOperator(ir.operator, left, right)
+    else if ir is FunctionCallNode:
+        // For navigation functions:
+        if ir.functionName equals "PREV":
+            varName = ir.arguments[0]
+            offset = (ir.arguments[1] if present else 1)
+            return getPreviousRowValue(context, varName, offset)
+        else if ir.functionName equals "NEXT":
+            // Similarly for NEXT
+        // Add support for FIRST, LAST, CLASSIFIER, MATCH_NUMBER as needed.
+    else:
+        throw ExpressionEvaluationError
+
+Notes:
+– The context is built from the current match state (e.g., a list of rows for each variable).
+– The evaluator should distinguish running vs. final contexts.
+
+
+
+
+3. Pattern Matching Engine (NFA/DFA)
+// The engine receives the pattern AST from the SQL parser.
+// It constructs an NFA that represents the row pattern.
+// Optionally, it converts the NFA to a DFA for performance.
+
+function buildNFA(patternAST: ASTNode) -> NFA
+    // Recursively traverse the pattern AST:
+    // - For a concatenation node, link the NFAs of the children in sequence.
+    // - For an alternation node (e.g., A | B), create a new start state with epsilon transitions to the NFAs for each alternative,
+    //   then combine their accepting states with epsilon transitions to a new accepting state.
+    // - For a grouping node, simply build the NFA for its contents.
+    // - For a quantifier node, build the NFA for the base pattern and then add loops or unroll as necessary:
+    //   * For '*' (zero or more), add epsilon transition from start to accepting state and a loop back.
+    //   * For '+' (one or more), require one occurrence and then loop.
+    //   * For '{n, m}', unroll n transitions and then add additional states with limited loops up to m.
+    // - For an exclusion node, mark the subpattern to be excluded in output (the NFA should consume the row but not output it).
+    nfa = recursivelyBuildNFA(patternAST)
+    return nfa
+
+function convertNFAtoDFA(nfa: NFA) -> DFA
+    // Use subset construction:
+    //   - Each DFA state is a set of NFA states (epsilon closure included).
+    //   - Build transitions for each input symbol.
+    //   - Minimize the DFA (optional, but beneficial for performance).
+    dfa = subsetConstruction(nfa)
+    return dfa
+
+function matchPattern(dfaOrNFA: StateMachine, rows: List<Row>, conditions: Map<String, ExpressionIR>, context: MatchContext) -> List<Match>
+    // Iterate over rows in the partition:
+    matches = []
+    i = 0
+    while i < length(rows):
+        context.resetMatch()
+        j = i
+        while j < length(rows) and stateMachineCanAdvance(dfaOrNFA, rows[j]):
+            // For each transition, evaluate the corresponding DEFINE condition:
+            for each expected pattern variable in currentTransition:
+                if not evaluateCondition(conditions[patternVariable], rows[j], context.getPreviousMatch()):
+                    break out and try next row
+            context.addRow(rows[j])
+            if stateMachineReachedAcceptingState(dfaOrNFA):
+                matches.add(context.currentMatch)
+                break
+            j = j + 1
+        // Advance i based on AFTER MATCH SKIP strategy (e.g., i = i + 1 or i = indexAfterLastRow)
+        i = updateStartIndex(i, context, dfaOrNFA, afterMatchOption)
+    return matches
+Notes:
+– The NFA/DFA construction uses well–known techniques.
+– The matching loop evaluates the conditions (from the DEFINE clause) for each row as it transitions between states.
+– The MatchContext is updated with which pattern variable each row matched (for use in navigation functions and measure evaluation).
+– The skip strategy (e.g., SKIP TO NEXT ROW) must be integrated here
+
+
+
+
+4. Execution Engine
+
+
+function runMatchRecognize(query: String, inputData: DataFrame) -> DataFrame
+    // Step 1: Parse SQL to get the AST
+    ast = parseSQL(query)
+    
+    // Step 2: Extract clauses from AST:
+    partitionCols = ast.getPartitionByColumns()
+    orderCols = ast.getOrderByColumns()   // Each element: (column, direction)
+    measures = ast.getMeasures()          // Map measure alias -> (function, argument)
+    patternAST = ast.getPatternAST()
+    conditionsExpr = ast.getDefineConditions()  // Map variable -> condition expression (as string)
+    subsets = ast.getSubsetMapping()              // e.g., { "U": ["A", "B"] }
+    afterMatchOption = ast.getAfterMatchOption()  // e.g., "SKIP TO NEXT ROW"
+    rowPerMatchOption = ast.getRowPerMatchOption()  // "ONE" or "ALL"
+    
+    // Step 3: Compile measure expressions and DEFINE conditions
+    compiledMeasures = {}
+    for alias, (func, arg) in measures:
+        if arg is not '*' then:
+            compiledMeasures[alias] = (func, compileExpression(arg))
+        else:
+            compiledMeasures[alias] = (func, arg)
+    
+    compiledConditions = {}
+    for variable, condition in conditionsExpr:
+        compiledConditions[variable] = compileExpression(condition)
+    
+    // Step 4: Preprocess pattern (expand subset tokens)
+    patternString = ast.getPatternString()
+    if subsets is not empty:
+        patternString = expandSubsets(patternString, subsets)
+    
+    // Step 5: Partition input data
+    partitions = partitionData(inputData, partitionCols)
+    
+    outputMatches = []
+    for each partition in partitions:
+        sortedRows = sortRows(partition, orderCols)  // Use type-aware sorting with ASC/DESC
+        // Build NFA from pattern AST
+        nfa = buildNFA(patternAST)  
+        // Optionally convert to DFA: dfa = convertNFAtoDFA(nfa)
+        // For each partition, create a new MatchContext
+        context = new MatchContext(matchNumber=..., rowPerMatch=rowPerMatchOption, afterMatch=afterMatchOption)
+        matches = matchPattern(nfa, sortedRows, compiledConditions, context)
+        for match in matches:
+            // Evaluate measures for each match
+            if rowPerMatchOption == "ONE":
+                resultRow = evaluateMeasures(compiledMeasures, match, context, mode="FINAL")
+                resultRow.addPartitionColumns(partition.key)
+                outputMatches.add(resultRow)
+            else if rowPerMatchOption == "ALL":
+                // For running measures, compute per row in match.
+                finalMeasures = evaluateMeasures(compiledMeasures, match, context, mode="FINAL")
+                for i from 0 to length(match)-1:
+                    runningMeasures = evaluateMeasures(compiledMeasures, match[0..i], context, mode="RUNNING")
+                    resultRow = merge(match[i], partition.key, runningMeasures, finalMeasures)
+                    outputMatches.add(resultRow)
+    
+    return DataFrame(outputMatches)
+
+
+Notes:
+– partitionData() groups rows by partition columns.
+– sortRows() uses order definitions (ASC/DESC) and converts data types appropriately.
+– evaluateMeasures() uses the compiled measure expressions to compute outputs from the match.
+– merge() constructs the output row from partition columns, input row data, and computed measures. 
+– The engine keeps track of performance stats and logs diagnostic information.
+
+
+
+5. Error Handling & Logging
+Throughout every module, add try/catch blocks and logging:
+try:
+    // parsing, compiling, matching, or evaluation code
+catch ParseError as pe:
+    log.error("Parse error: " + pe.message + " in query: " + querySnippet)
+    raise
+catch ExpressionEvaluationError as ee:
+    log.error("Expression evaluation failed: " + ee.message + " in context: " + contextInfo)
+    // Optionally, return an error code or fallback
+catch PatternMatchError as pme:
+    log.error("Pattern matching error: " + pme.message)
+    // Continue processing or abort based on severity
+
+
+
+Summary
+This detailed pseudocode outlines how you can structure a production-grade MATCH_RECOGNIZE engine:
+
+Parsing: Use a full grammar to build an AST with all clauses.
+Expression Evaluation: Compile expressions into an IR and evaluate with a context that includes running or final match data.
+Pattern Matching: Construct an NFA from the pattern AST (and optionally convert it to DFA), and use it to match rows from sorted partitions while applying DEFINE conditions.
+Execution: Partition and sort data, run the matcher on each partition, evaluate measures per match (or per row in ALL ROWS mode), and assemble output rows.
+Error Handling: Provide comprehensive error messages and logging at every step.
+This architecture is modular and extensible and would form a solid foundation for a production-grade engine with further optimizations and refinements.
+
+Would you like to dive into more specific pseudocode details for any particular module?
+
+
+
+
+. Modular Design
+
+SQL Parser Module:
+Use a mature parser generator (e.g., ANTLR) to support the full SQL MATCH_RECOGNIZE syntax.
+
+Build a complete Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) that represents all subclauses (PARTITION BY, ORDER BY, MEASURES, PATTERN, DEFINE, SUBSET, AFTER MATCH SKIP, etc.).
+Include thorough validations for pattern variables and measure expressions.
+Expression Evaluation Module:
+Develop or integrate a robust expression evaluator to safely parse and evaluate conditions and measure expressions.
+
+Support complex boolean and arithmetic expressions.
+Handle navigation functions (e.g., PREV, NEXT, FIRST, LAST) with both running and final semantics.
+Precompile expressions and cache them for efficient repeated evaluations.
+Pattern Matching Engine:
+Implement an advanced matching engine that constructs an NFA from the parsed AST and—where beneficial—converts it to a DFA.
+
+Support all pattern operators: concatenation, alternation, grouping, permutation, quantifiers (including exact and range), exclusions, and subset definitions.
+Optimize with epsilon closure caching, state minimization, and transition table precomputation.
+Provide options for overlapping (AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW/FIRST/LAST) and non-overlapping matches.
+Execution Engine:
+Integrate the parser, expression evaluator, and pattern matcher to process the input DataFrame.
+
+Partition data by PARTITION BY columns and sort each partition based on ORDER BY (with support for ASC/DESC and data–type aware sorting).
+Apply the matching engine on each partition, evaluate measures, and produce output rows based on ONE ROW PER MATCH or ALL ROWS PER MATCH semantics.
+Maintain performance statistics and detailed logging.
+Error Handling & Diagnostics:
+Implement comprehensive error handling across modules:
+
+Provide detailed error messages (including context, hints, and error codes) for syntax errors, ambiguous patterns, and runtime matching issues.
+Use logging frameworks with configurable verbosity levels for both debugging and production monitoring.
+2. Detailed Component Enhancements
+A. SQL Parser Enhancements
+Full Grammar Support:
+Extend the grammar to handle nested expressions, multiple conditions (AND, OR, NOT), and complex measure expressions.
+
+Subset & Skip Options:
+
+Parse the SUBSET clause and expand subset tokens (e.g., replace a subset variable with an alternation of its members).
+Recognize and store advanced AFTER MATCH SKIP options (e.g., SKIP TO FIRST A, SKIP TO LAST B).
+AST Generation:
+Generate a detailed AST that feeds directly into the matching engine and the expression evaluator.
+
+B. Expression Evaluation Improvements
+Robust Expression Parser:
+Use a dedicated parser (or a safe library) to handle arithmetic and boolean expressions beyond simple regex–based matching.
+
+Support nested navigation functions and compound conditions.
+Precompile and cache parsed expressions to improve runtime performance.
+Context–Sensitive Evaluation:
+Ensure that expressions in the DEFINE and MEASURES clauses can reference:
+
+The entire match (final semantics) or the growing match (running semantics).
+Specific pattern variables, by filtering the match rows accordingly.
+Security & Efficiency:
+Avoid using insecure methods like direct eval; instead, compile expressions into an intermediate representation (IR) that’s safely executed.
+
+C. Pattern Matching Engine Enhancements
+Advanced NFA/DFA Construction:
+
+Build the NFA from the AST while supporting the full range of operators (quantifiers, alternation, exclusions, grouping).
+For performance-critical paths, convert the NFA to a DFA where possible.
+Implement state minimization techniques to reduce the number of states.
+Optimized Matching:
+
+Cache epsilon closures and state transitions.
+Use incremental matching to avoid reprocessing input rows, especially on large datasets.
+Consider multi-threading for processing different partitions in parallel.
+Comprehensive Skip Logic:
+Adjust the engine to correctly implement all AFTER MATCH SKIP options:
+
+For SKIP PAST LAST ROW: resume from the row immediately after the match.
+For SKIP TO NEXT ROW/FIRST/LAST: resume based on the matched variable’s position.
+D. Execution Engine Enhancements
+Partitioning and Ordering:
+Enhance the ORDER BY processing to support sort directions (ASC/DESC) and perform type–aware sorting (e.g., numeric and date types).
+Measure Evaluation:
+Distinguish between running and final measures; compute final measures once per match and reuse them across output rows.
+Support aggregations that are scoped to specific pattern variables.
+Robust Integration:
+Tie together the parser, expression evaluator, and pattern matcher into a single cohesive engine that can handle production loads.
+E. Error Handling & Logging
+Diagnostic Enhancements:
+Use detailed log messages and error contexts in all modules.
+Provide fallback and safe–exit strategies for ambiguous patterns.
+Test Coverage:
+Develop an extensive test suite covering edge cases, complex nested expressions, and ambiguous pattern constructs.
+Use performance benchmarking tools to profile and optimize matching speed.
+3. Implementation Considerations
+Scalability:
+Consider designing the engine to work with streaming data or integrate with distributed computing frameworks if needed.
+
+Modularity:
+Keep the SQL parser, expression evaluator, and pattern matcher loosely coupled so that improvements in one area (e.g., swapping out the expression evaluator) do not require rewriting the entire system.
+
+Integration:
+Provide a clear API for external callers (e.g., a method that accepts a SQL query string and a DataFrame, and returns a new DataFrame with matched results).
+
+Security & Robustness:
+Validate all inputs rigorously. Use sandboxing for expression evaluations to prevent arbitrary code execution.
+
+Specific Implementation Improvements
+Short-term Improvements
+Optimize variable lookups in the evaluate_pattern_variable_reference function
+Add proper error handling for malformed pattern variable references
+Implement caching for frequently accessed rows and variables
+Support for more navigation functions like PREV and NEXT
+Add proper handling for empty matches in all scenarios
+Medium-term Improvements
+Implement a proper expression evaluator for complex measure expressions
+Add support for pattern exclusions with proper semantics
+Optimize partition handling for large datasets
+Implement proper type handling for measure values
+Add support for CLASSIFIER() function with proper semantics
+
+
+/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+Support for Complex Expressions: Extend the parser to handle more complex expressions in DEFINE, MEASURES, and PARTITION BY clauses.
+
+Subquery Support: Add support for subqueries within MATCH_RECOGNIZE.
+Error Handling: Improve error messages with line/column information for syntax errors.
+
+Advanced Pattern Features
+Complex Pattern Support
+Nested Patterns: Support for nested pattern expressions.
+Pattern Exclusions: Enhance pattern exclusion handling.
+Quantifier Improvements: Support for reluctant and possessive quantifiers.
+
+
+Optimized Automata
+Lazy DFA Construction: Build DFA states on-demand rather than all at once.
+Pattern Optimization: Analyze patterns to eliminate redundant states.
+
+
+Advanced Row Navigation
+Window Functions: Support for window functions in measures.
+Aggregation Functions: Add more aggregation functions (STDDEV, PERCENTILE, etc.).
+
+
+Production-level Assessment of MATCH_RECOGNIZE Implementation
+The implementation has solid foundations but needs several improvements to meet production requirements:
+Strengths
+Complete feature coverage: The implementation includes all required components of the MATCH_RECOGNIZE clause:
+PARTITION BY
+ORDER BY
+MEASURES
+ROWS PER MATCH options
+AFTER MATCH SKIP modes
+PATTERN syntax with regular expression support
+SUBSET capability
+DEFINE variables
+Pattern matching fundamentals: Uses proper automata-based approach with NFA → DFA conversion
+Navigation functions: Implements PREV, NEXT, FIRST, LAST functions
+Aggregation support: Handles aggregations over pattern variables
+Exclusion patterns: Supports the {- pattern -} syntax for excluding portions from output
+Areas Needing Improvement
+Error handling: Needs more comprehensive error handling across the implementation
+Performance optimization: Current implementation has potential bottlenecks:
+Pattern matching algorithm could be optimized
+Condition evaluation appears to make repeated function calls
+Test coverage: Inadequate testing is implied by debug print statements left in code
+Documentation: Code is documented but lacks comprehensive API documentation
+Edge cases: Some edge cases appear to be handled with special hacks rather than systematic approaches
+Specific syntax support gaps:
+RUNNING/FINAL semantics are partially implemented but need proper validation
+CLASSIFIER() function may have incomplete support
+PERMUTE pattern handling needs optimization
+Partition handling: The current approach loads all partitions in memory which may cause issues with large datasets
+Recommendations for Production Readiness
+Performance optimization:
+Optimize condition compilation and caching
+Improve pattern matching algorithm efficiency
+Add query plan optimization
+Robustness improvements:
+Add comprehensive input validation
+Improve error messages and error handling
+Implement proper logging instead of print statements
+Comprehensive testing:
+Unit tests for each component
+Integration tests for end-to-end scenarios
+Performance benchmarks
+Edge case testing
+Documentation:
+Add comprehensive API documentation
+Include usage examples
+Document implementation details
+Memory management:
+Implement streaming processing for large datasets
+Add memory usage monitoring and controls
+Code quality:
+Refactor complex methods into smaller, more maintainable pieces
+Remove debugging print statements
+Add type annotations consistently
+Feature completion:
+Ensure all RUNNING/FINAL semantics are properly implemented
+Complete support for all pattern syntax features
+Add support for more aggregate functions
+Monitoring and observability:
+Add performance metrics
+Implement proper logging
+The implementation has a good foundation but requires these improvements before it can be considered production-ready.