openjury 0.1.0__tar.gz

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
1
+ *.pyc
2
+ *.pyo
3
+ *.pyz
4
+ __pycache__/
5
+ .venv/
6
+ venv/
7
+ .env/
8
+ dist/
9
+ build/
10
+ *.egg-info/
11
+ .pytest_cache/
12
+ .mypy_cache/
13
+ .coverage
14
+ htmlcov/
15
+ dev.md
openjury-0.1.0/LICENSE ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
1
+ Apache License
2
+ Version 2.0, January 2004
3
+ http://www.apache.org/licenses/
4
+
5
+ TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
6
+
7
+ 1. Definitions.
8
+
9
+ "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
10
+ and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
11
+
12
+ "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
13
+ the copyright owner that is granting the License.
14
+
15
+ "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
16
+ other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
17
+ control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
18
+ "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
19
+ direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
20
+ otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
21
+ outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
22
+
23
+ "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
24
+ exercising permissions granted by this License.
25
+
26
+ "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
27
+ including but not limited to software source code, documentation
28
+ source, and configuration files.
29
+
30
+ "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
31
+ transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
32
+ not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
33
+ and conversions to other media types.
34
+
35
+ "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
36
+ Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
37
+ copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
38
+ (an example is provided in the Appendix below).
39
+
40
+ "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
41
+ form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
42
+ editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
43
+ represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
44
+ of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
45
+ separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
46
+ the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
47
+
48
+ "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
49
+ the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
50
+ to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
51
+ submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
52
+ or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
53
+ the copyright owner.
54
+
55
+ "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
56
+ on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
57
+ subsequently incorporated within the Work.
58
+
59
+ 2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
60
+ this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
61
+ worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
62
+ copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
63
+ publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
64
+ Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
65
+
66
+ 3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
67
+ this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
68
+ worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
69
+ (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
70
+ use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
71
+ where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
72
+ by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
73
+ Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
74
+ with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
75
+ institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
76
+ cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
77
+ or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
78
+ or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
79
+ granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
80
+ as of the date such litigation is filed.
81
+
82
+ 4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
83
+ Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
84
+ modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
85
+ meet the following conditions:
86
+
87
+ (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
88
+ Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
89
+
90
+ (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
91
+ stating that You changed the files; and
92
+
93
+ (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
94
+ that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
95
+ attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
96
+ excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
97
+ the Derivative Works; and
98
+
99
+ (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
100
+ distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
101
+ include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
102
+ within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
103
+ pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
104
+ of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
105
+ as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
106
+ documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
107
+ within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
108
+ wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
109
+ of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
110
+ do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
111
+ notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
112
+ or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
113
+ that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
114
+ as modifying the License.
115
+
116
+ You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
117
+ may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
118
+ for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
119
+ for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
120
+ reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
121
+ the conditions stated in this License.
122
+
123
+ 5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
124
+ any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
125
+ by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
126
+ this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
127
+ Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
128
+ the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
129
+ with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
130
+
131
+ 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
132
+ names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
133
+ except as required for describing the origin of the Work and
134
+ reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
135
+
136
+ 7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
137
+ agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
138
+ Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
139
+ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
140
+ implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
141
+ of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
142
+ PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
143
+ appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
144
+ risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
145
+
146
+ 8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
147
+ whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
148
+ unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
149
+ negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
150
+ liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
151
+ incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
152
+ result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
153
+ Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
154
+ work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
155
+ other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
156
+ has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
157
+
158
+ 9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
159
+ the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
160
+ and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
161
+ or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
162
+ License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
163
+ on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
164
+ of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
165
+ defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
166
+ incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
167
+ of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
168
+
169
+ END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
170
+
171
+ APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
172
+
173
+ To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
174
+ boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
175
+ replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
176
+ the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
177
+ comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
178
+ file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
179
+ same "printed page" as the license notice for easier identification
180
+ within third-party archives.
181
+
182
+ Copyright [2025] [robiscoding]
183
+
184
+ Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
185
+ you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
186
+ You may obtain a copy of the License at
187
+
188
+ http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
189
+
190
+ Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
191
+ distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
192
+ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
193
+ See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
194
+ limitations under the License.
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
1
+ Metadata-Version: 2.4
2
+ Name: openjury
3
+ Version: 0.1.0
4
+ Summary: Python SDK for evaluating multiple model outputs using configurable LLM-based jurors
5
+ Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/robiscoding/openjury
6
+ Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/robiscoding/openjury
7
+ Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/robiscoding/openjury/issues
8
+ Author-email: robiscoding <robiscodingg@gmail.com>
9
+ License: Apache-2.0
10
+ License-File: LICENSE
11
+ Keywords: ai,evaluation,langchain,llm,llm-as-a-judge,machine-learning,model-comparison,model-consensus,openai
12
+ Classifier: Development Status :: 3 - Alpha
13
+ Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
14
+ Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License
15
+ Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
16
+ Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11
17
+ Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
18
+ Requires-Python: >=3.11
19
+ Requires-Dist: langchain-openai>=0.1.0
20
+ Requires-Dist: langchain>=0.1.0
21
+ Requires-Dist: openai>=1.0.0
22
+ Requires-Dist: pydantic>=2.0.0
23
+ Provides-Extra: dev
24
+ Requires-Dist: black>=23.0.0; extra == 'dev'
25
+ Requires-Dist: isort>=5.12.0; extra == 'dev'
26
+ Requires-Dist: mypy>=1.0.0; extra == 'dev'
27
+ Requires-Dist: pytest-cov>=4.0.0; extra == 'dev'
28
+ Requires-Dist: pytest>=7.0.0; extra == 'dev'
29
+ Requires-Dist: twine>=4.0.0; extra == 'dev'
30
+ Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
31
+
32
+ # OpenJury 🏛️
33
+
34
+ **A Python SDK for evaluating and comparing multiple model outputs using configurable LLM-based jurors.**
35
+
36
+ [![Python 3.11+](https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.11+-blue.svg)](https://www.python.org/downloads/)
37
+ [![License: Apache 2.0](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-Apache%202.0-blue.svg)](https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0)
38
+
39
+ ---
40
+
41
+ ## Overview
42
+
43
+ **OpenJury** is a post-inference ensemble framework that evaluates and compares multiple model outputs using configurable LLM-based jurors. It enables structured model assessment, ranking, and A/B testing directly into your Python apps, research workflows, or ML platforms.
44
+
45
+ At its core, OpenJury is a decision-level, LLM-driven evaluation system that aggregates juror scores using flexibile voting strategies (e.g. weighted, ranked, consensus, etc.). This makes it a powerful and extensible solution for nuanced, after-inference comparison of generated outputs across models, prompts, versions, or datasets.
46
+
47
+ ### Why use an LLM Jury?
48
+
49
+ AI models can generate fluent, convincing outputs, but fluency != correctness. Whether you're building a customer service agent, a code review assist, or a content generator, you need to know which response is best, correct, or how models compare with quality and consistency. Human evaluation doesn't scale, which is why LLM-based jurors are widely used.
50
+
51
+ But relying on a single LLM (like GPT-4o) to evaluate model outputs, although common, is expensive and can introduce [intra-model bias](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13076). Research by Cohere [shows](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18796) that using a panel of smaller, diverse models not only cuts cost but also leads to more reliable and less biased evaluations.
52
+
53
+ OpenJury puts this into practice: instead of a single judge, it uses multiple jurors to score and explain outputs. The result? Better evlautions and lower costs, all configurable with a declarative interface.
54
+
55
+
56
+ ---
57
+
58
+ ## Key Features
59
+
60
+ - **Python SDK:** Simple integration, flexible configuration
61
+ - **Multi-Criteria Evaluation:** Define custom criteria with weights and scoring
62
+ - **Advanced Voting Methods:** Majority, average, weighted, ranked, consensus, or your own
63
+ - **Parallel Processing:** Evaluate at scale, concurrently
64
+ - **Rich Output:** Scores, explanations, voting breakdowns, and confidence metrics
65
+ - **Extensible:** Plug in your own jurors, voting logic, and evaluation strategies
66
+ - **Dev Experience:** One-command setup, Makefile workflow, and modern code quality tools
67
+
68
+ ---
69
+
70
+ ## Installation
71
+
72
+ **Requirements:** Python 3.11 or newer
73
+
74
+ ### Recommended (PyPI)
75
+
76
+ ```bash
77
+ pip install openjury
78
+ ```
79
+
80
+ ### From Source (for development/contribution)
81
+
82
+ ```bash
83
+ git clone https://github.com/robiscoding/openjury.git
84
+ cd openjury
85
+ pip install -e .
86
+ uv pip install -e ".[dev]" # (optional) dev dependencies
87
+ ```
88
+
89
+ ## Quick Start
90
+
91
+ ### Set Environment Variables
92
+
93
+ ```bash
94
+ export OPENROUTER_API_KEY="your-api-key"
95
+ ```
96
+
97
+ or if you're using OpenAI:
98
+ ```bash
99
+ export LLM_PROVIDER="openai"
100
+ export OPENAI_API_KEY="your-api-key"
101
+ ```
102
+
103
+ ### Basic Usage
104
+
105
+ ```python
106
+ from openjury import OpenJury, JuryConfig
107
+
108
+ config = JuryConfig.from_json_file("jury_config.json")
109
+ jury = OpenJury(config)
110
+ verdict = jury.evaluate(
111
+ prompt="Write a Python function to reverse a string",
112
+ responses=[
113
+ "def reverse(s): return s[::-1]",
114
+ "def reverse(s): return ''.join(reversed(s))"
115
+ ]
116
+ )
117
+
118
+ print(f"Winner: {verdict.final_verdict.winner}")
119
+ print(f"Confidence: {verdict.final_verdict.confidence:.2%}")
120
+ ```
121
+
122
+ ### Configuration Example (jury_config.json)
123
+
124
+ ```json
125
+ {
126
+ "name": "Code Quality Jury",
127
+ "criteria": [
128
+ {"name": "correctness", "weight": 2.0, "max_score": 5},
129
+ {"name": "readability", "weight": 1.5, "max_score": 5}
130
+ ],
131
+ "jurors": [
132
+ {"name": "Senior Developer", "system_prompt": "You are a senior developer. You are tasked with reviewing the code and providing a score and explanation for the correctness and readability of the code.", "model_name": "qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b", "weight": 2.0},
133
+ {"name": "Code Reviewer", "system_prompt": "You are a code reviewer. You are tasked with reviewing the code and providing a score and explanation for the correctness and readability of the code.", "model_name": "llama3/llama-3.1-8b-instruct", "weight": 1.0}
134
+ ],
135
+ "voting_method": "weighted"
136
+ }
137
+ ```
138
+
139
+ ### Examples
140
+
141
+ You can find more examples in the [examples](examples) directory.
142
+
143
+ ### Use Cases
144
+
145
+ #### Model Evaluation & Comparison
146
+ - Compare outputs from different models (e.g., GPT-4 vs Claude vs custom models)
147
+ - Run A/B tests across prompt variations, fine-tuned models, or versions
148
+
149
+ #### Content & Response Quality
150
+ - Evaluate generated code for correctness and readability
151
+ - Score long-form content (blogs, papers, explanations) for clarity, tone, or coherence
152
+
153
+ #### Automated Grading & Assessment
154
+ - Grade student answers or interview responses at scale
155
+ - Score generated outputs against rubric-style criteria
156
+
157
+ #### Production Monitoring & QA
158
+ - Monitor output quality in production systems
159
+ - Detect degradation or drift between model versions
160
+
161
+ #### Custom Evaluation Workflows
162
+ - Integrate LLM-based judgment into human-in-the-loop pipelines
163
+ - Use configurable jurors and voting for domain-specific tasks
164
+
165
+ ---
166
+
167
+ ## License
168
+
169
+ OpenJury is licensed under the Apache License 2.0. See the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.
170
+
171
+ ---
172
+
173
+ ## Contributing
174
+
175
+ Contributions are welcome! Please see the [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md) file for details.
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
1
+ # OpenJury 🏛️
2
+
3
+ **A Python SDK for evaluating and comparing multiple model outputs using configurable LLM-based jurors.**
4
+
5
+ [![Python 3.11+](https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.11+-blue.svg)](https://www.python.org/downloads/)
6
+ [![License: Apache 2.0](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-Apache%202.0-blue.svg)](https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0)
7
+
8
+ ---
9
+
10
+ ## Overview
11
+
12
+ **OpenJury** is a post-inference ensemble framework that evaluates and compares multiple model outputs using configurable LLM-based jurors. It enables structured model assessment, ranking, and A/B testing directly into your Python apps, research workflows, or ML platforms.
13
+
14
+ At its core, OpenJury is a decision-level, LLM-driven evaluation system that aggregates juror scores using flexibile voting strategies (e.g. weighted, ranked, consensus, etc.). This makes it a powerful and extensible solution for nuanced, after-inference comparison of generated outputs across models, prompts, versions, or datasets.
15
+
16
+ ### Why use an LLM Jury?
17
+
18
+ AI models can generate fluent, convincing outputs, but fluency != correctness. Whether you're building a customer service agent, a code review assist, or a content generator, you need to know which response is best, correct, or how models compare with quality and consistency. Human evaluation doesn't scale, which is why LLM-based jurors are widely used.
19
+
20
+ But relying on a single LLM (like GPT-4o) to evaluate model outputs, although common, is expensive and can introduce [intra-model bias](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13076). Research by Cohere [shows](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18796) that using a panel of smaller, diverse models not only cuts cost but also leads to more reliable and less biased evaluations.
21
+
22
+ OpenJury puts this into practice: instead of a single judge, it uses multiple jurors to score and explain outputs. The result? Better evlautions and lower costs, all configurable with a declarative interface.
23
+
24
+
25
+ ---
26
+
27
+ ## Key Features
28
+
29
+ - **Python SDK:** Simple integration, flexible configuration
30
+ - **Multi-Criteria Evaluation:** Define custom criteria with weights and scoring
31
+ - **Advanced Voting Methods:** Majority, average, weighted, ranked, consensus, or your own
32
+ - **Parallel Processing:** Evaluate at scale, concurrently
33
+ - **Rich Output:** Scores, explanations, voting breakdowns, and confidence metrics
34
+ - **Extensible:** Plug in your own jurors, voting logic, and evaluation strategies
35
+ - **Dev Experience:** One-command setup, Makefile workflow, and modern code quality tools
36
+
37
+ ---
38
+
39
+ ## Installation
40
+
41
+ **Requirements:** Python 3.11 or newer
42
+
43
+ ### Recommended (PyPI)
44
+
45
+ ```bash
46
+ pip install openjury
47
+ ```
48
+
49
+ ### From Source (for development/contribution)
50
+
51
+ ```bash
52
+ git clone https://github.com/robiscoding/openjury.git
53
+ cd openjury
54
+ pip install -e .
55
+ uv pip install -e ".[dev]" # (optional) dev dependencies
56
+ ```
57
+
58
+ ## Quick Start
59
+
60
+ ### Set Environment Variables
61
+
62
+ ```bash
63
+ export OPENROUTER_API_KEY="your-api-key"
64
+ ```
65
+
66
+ or if you're using OpenAI:
67
+ ```bash
68
+ export LLM_PROVIDER="openai"
69
+ export OPENAI_API_KEY="your-api-key"
70
+ ```
71
+
72
+ ### Basic Usage
73
+
74
+ ```python
75
+ from openjury import OpenJury, JuryConfig
76
+
77
+ config = JuryConfig.from_json_file("jury_config.json")
78
+ jury = OpenJury(config)
79
+ verdict = jury.evaluate(
80
+ prompt="Write a Python function to reverse a string",
81
+ responses=[
82
+ "def reverse(s): return s[::-1]",
83
+ "def reverse(s): return ''.join(reversed(s))"
84
+ ]
85
+ )
86
+
87
+ print(f"Winner: {verdict.final_verdict.winner}")
88
+ print(f"Confidence: {verdict.final_verdict.confidence:.2%}")
89
+ ```
90
+
91
+ ### Configuration Example (jury_config.json)
92
+
93
+ ```json
94
+ {
95
+ "name": "Code Quality Jury",
96
+ "criteria": [
97
+ {"name": "correctness", "weight": 2.0, "max_score": 5},
98
+ {"name": "readability", "weight": 1.5, "max_score": 5}
99
+ ],
100
+ "jurors": [
101
+ {"name": "Senior Developer", "system_prompt": "You are a senior developer. You are tasked with reviewing the code and providing a score and explanation for the correctness and readability of the code.", "model_name": "qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b", "weight": 2.0},
102
+ {"name": "Code Reviewer", "system_prompt": "You are a code reviewer. You are tasked with reviewing the code and providing a score and explanation for the correctness and readability of the code.", "model_name": "llama3/llama-3.1-8b-instruct", "weight": 1.0}
103
+ ],
104
+ "voting_method": "weighted"
105
+ }
106
+ ```
107
+
108
+ ### Examples
109
+
110
+ You can find more examples in the [examples](examples) directory.
111
+
112
+ ### Use Cases
113
+
114
+ #### Model Evaluation & Comparison
115
+ - Compare outputs from different models (e.g., GPT-4 vs Claude vs custom models)
116
+ - Run A/B tests across prompt variations, fine-tuned models, or versions
117
+
118
+ #### Content & Response Quality
119
+ - Evaluate generated code for correctness and readability
120
+ - Score long-form content (blogs, papers, explanations) for clarity, tone, or coherence
121
+
122
+ #### Automated Grading & Assessment
123
+ - Grade student answers or interview responses at scale
124
+ - Score generated outputs against rubric-style criteria
125
+
126
+ #### Production Monitoring & QA
127
+ - Monitor output quality in production systems
128
+ - Detect degradation or drift between model versions
129
+
130
+ #### Custom Evaluation Workflows
131
+ - Integrate LLM-based judgment into human-in-the-loop pipelines
132
+ - Use configurable jurors and voting for domain-specific tasks
133
+
134
+ ---
135
+
136
+ ## License
137
+
138
+ OpenJury is licensed under the Apache License 2.0. See the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.
139
+
140
+ ---
141
+
142
+ ## Contributing
143
+
144
+ Contributions are welcome! Please see the [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md) file for details.
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
1
+ [project]
2
+ name = "openjury"
3
+ version = "0.1.0"
4
+ description = "Python SDK for evaluating multiple model outputs using configurable LLM-based jurors"
5
+ authors = [{ name = "robiscoding", email = "robiscodingg@gmail.com" }]
6
+ readme = "README.md"
7
+ license = {text = "Apache-2.0"}
8
+ requires-python = ">=3.11"
9
+ keywords = [
10
+ "llm",
11
+ "evaluation",
12
+ "ai",
13
+ "model-consensus",
14
+ "llm-as-a-judge",
15
+ "model-comparison",
16
+ "openai",
17
+ "langchain",
18
+ "machine-learning"
19
+ ]
20
+ classifiers = [
21
+ "Development Status :: 3 - Alpha",
22
+ "Intended Audience :: Developers",
23
+ "License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License",
24
+ "Programming Language :: Python :: 3",
25
+ "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11",
26
+ "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12",
27
+ ]
28
+
29
+ dependencies = [
30
+ "langchain>=0.1.0",
31
+ "langchain-openai>=0.1.0",
32
+ "openai>=1.0.0",
33
+ "pydantic>=2.0.0",
34
+ ]
35
+
36
+ [build-system]
37
+ requires = ["hatchling"]
38
+ build-backend = "hatchling.build"
39
+
40
+ [project.optional-dependencies]
41
+ dev = [
42
+ "pytest>=7.0.0",
43
+ "pytest-cov>=4.0.0",
44
+ "black>=23.0.0",
45
+ "isort>=5.12.0",
46
+ "mypy>=1.0.0",
47
+ "twine>=4.0.0",
48
+ ]
49
+
50
+ [project.urls]
51
+ Homepage = "https://github.com/robiscoding/openjury"
52
+ Repository = "https://github.com/robiscoding/openjury"
53
+ Issues = "https://github.com/robiscoding/openjury/issues"
54
+
55
+
56
+ [tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel]
57
+ packages = ["src/openjury"]
58
+
59
+ [tool.hatch.build.targets.sdist]
60
+ include = ["/src", "/tests", "/README.md", "/LICENSE"]
61
+
62
+ [tool.black]
63
+ line-length = 88
64
+ target-version = ['py311']
65
+ include = '\.pyi?$'
66
+
67
+ [tool.isort]
68
+ profile = "black"
69
+ multi_line_output = 3
70
+
71
+ [tool.mypy]
72
+ python_version = "3.11"
73
+ warn_return_any = true
74
+ warn_unused_configs = true
75
+ disallow_untyped_defs = true
76
+
77
+ [tool.pytest.ini_options]
78
+ testpaths = ["tests"]
79
+ python_files = ["test_*.py"]
80
+ python_classes = ["Test*"]
81
+ python_functions = ["test_*"]
82
+
83
+ [tool.twine]
84
+ repository = "pypi"
85
+ repository-test = "testpypi"
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
1
+ """OpenJury: A modular framework for evaluating multiple model outputs using LLM-based jurors."""
2
+
3
+ from openjury.config import (
4
+ CriterionConfig,
5
+ JurorConfig,
6
+ JuryConfig,
7
+ ResponseCandidate,
8
+ VotingCriteria,
9
+ )
10
+ from openjury.juror import Juror
11
+ from openjury.jury_engine import OpenJury
12
+ from openjury.output_format import Verdict, VerdictFormatter
13
+ from openjury.voting import (
14
+ JurorEvaluation,
15
+ VotingAggregator,
16
+ VotingMethod,
17
+ VotingResult,
18
+ )
19
+
20
+ __version__ = "0.1.0"
21
+ __all__ = [
22
+ "OpenJury",
23
+ "Juror",
24
+ "JurorConfig",
25
+ "JuryConfig",
26
+ "CriterionConfig",
27
+ "VerdictFormatter",
28
+ "Verdict",
29
+ "VotingMethod",
30
+ "VotingAggregator",
31
+ "JurorEvaluation",
32
+ "VotingResult",
33
+ "VotingCriteria",
34
+ "ResponseCandidate",
35
+ ]