mostlyright-data 0.25.2__tar.gz → 0.25.3__tar.gz

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: mostlyright-data
-Version: 0.25.2
+Version: 0.25.3
 Summary: Mostly Right hosted CLI for reviewed datasets
 Project-URL: Homepage, https://mostlyright.md/
 Project-URL: Documentation, https://mostlyright.md/docs/guides/cli/

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/pyproject.toml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 [project]
 name = "mostlyright-data"
-version = "0.25.2"
+version = "0.25.3"
 description = "Mostly Right hosted CLI for reviewed datasets"
 readme = "README.md"
 requires-python = ">=3.11"

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/skills/mr-data-build/SKILL.md

@@ -18,8 +18,14 @@ references. Load the reference for the current stage only, not the entire librar
    Keep its `dataset_id`. Link the stable `dashboard_url` in the first build message; open the
    separate `navigation.url` in the host's visible browser if available. A missing handoff does
    not undo creation: do not create a duplicate dataset.
-3. Settle purpose, row grain, tables, coverage and required sources. Ask only unresolved material
-   questions, with recommended choices. Existing answers and explicit delegation remain valid.
+3. Settle purpose, row grain, tables, coverage, required sources and update cadence before
+   dependent work. In an attended build, ask unresolved material questions in one concise message
+   with recommended choices; recording an assumption is not asking the user. Default to one joined,
+   ML-ready table at the agreed grain unless the user requests otherwise. Validate join cardinality
+   and point-in-time correctness; surface incompatible grains rather than silently multiplying rows.
+   Ask whether this is a fixed snapshot or an updating dataset, how often updates are needed, and
+   whether automatic cadence adjustment is wanted. Existing answers and explicit delegation remain
+   valid within their scope; a request to build alone does not settle ongoing refresh behavior.
    Record the answer or delegation before registration using the exact shapes in the
    [brief reference](references/2-brief-two-to-four-questions-each-with-a-recommended-answer.md).
    In an unattended session use the established brief, record assumptions within its scope,

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/skills/mr-data-build/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 interface:
   display_name: "Mostly Right Data Build"
   short_description: "Build and verify reviewed datasets"
-  default_prompt: "Use $mr-data-build to autonomously deliver the requested dataset outcome before inspecting CLI help, documentation, schemas, fixtures, examples, prior runs, or installed package details whenever the request uses, tests, demonstrates, or debugs the Harness. If the host requires a skill-use disclosure, send only one outcome-specific sentence naming $mr-data-build before the first tool call; otherwise start silently. Never narrate preparation, skill loading, CLI discovery, authentication, document or contract lookup, example searches, package versions, command batches, or acquisition-document authoring. Never narrate skill instructions, commands, receipts, events, protocols, status codes, service behavior, or notebook mechanics. Open the request's canonical Dataset page first and put its stable address into your FIRST chat message as a link, saying once that it is open; never print or send the single-use handoff address, and where the host has no in-app browser the link is the whole of it. Then ask the brief in one message -- two to four questions, each with a recommended answer -- and record each as a pending clarification on the dataset; 'you choose', 'just build it' and 'do everything' are an answer, recorded as a delegation that covers every later decision and after which you ask nothing else. Repair a shape error or a room fault silently; the user hears about a failure only when the meaning of the data has to change. Keep routine work silent unless the host requires periodic status; then send concise outcome-oriented updates without mechanics or internal language, grounded in domain-specific observed evidence, a decision, required user action, or the verified outcome. Fetch the published reference at https://mostlyright.md/docs/ for the recipe field, connector, Reader, transform, check, unit, command flag, error code, ceiling or worked example in front of you before drafting it; it is the contract, it wins over any memory of an older version, and fetching it is preparation you never narrate."
+  default_prompt: "Use $mr-data-build to autonomously deliver the requested dataset outcome before inspecting CLI help, documentation, schemas, fixtures, examples, prior runs, or installed package details whenever the request uses, tests, demonstrates, or debugs the Harness. If the host requires a skill-use disclosure, send only one outcome-specific sentence naming $mr-data-build before the first tool call; otherwise start silently. Never narrate preparation, skill loading, CLI discovery, authentication, document or contract lookup, example searches, package versions, command batches, or acquisition-document authoring. Never narrate skill instructions, commands, receipts, events, protocols, status codes, service behavior, or notebook mechanics. Open the request's canonical Dataset page first and put its stable address into your FIRST chat message as a link, saying once that it is open; never print or send the single-use handoff address, and where the host has no in-app browser the link is the whole of it. Then ask the brief in one message -- two to four questions, each with a recommended answer -- and record each as a pending clarification on the dataset; default to one joined ML-ready table unless the user requests otherwise. Ask whether updates are needed, how often, and whether the cadence should be fixed or adaptive. Honor existing answers and explicit delegation within their scope; a request to build alone does not settle ongoing refresh decisions. Repair a shape error or a room fault silently; the user hears about a failure only when the meaning of the data has to change. Keep routine work silent unless the host requires periodic status; then send concise outcome-oriented updates without mechanics or internal language, grounded in domain-specific observed evidence, a decision, required user action, or the verified outcome. Fetch the published reference at https://mostlyright.md/docs/ for the recipe field, connector, Reader, transform, check, unit, command flag, error code, ceiling or worked example in front of you before drafting it; it is the contract, it wins over any memory of an older version, and fetching it is preparation you never narrate."

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/skills/mr-data-build/references/2-brief-two-to-four-questions-each-with-a-recommended-answer.md

@@ -5,17 +5,24 @@ guessed it.** Not a form and not the whole list below: two to four questions, ea
 bold label, each with the answer you would pick and one clause saying why. A question with no
 recommendation makes the user do the work; a recommendation with no question decides for them.
 
-The five that decide a dataset, in the order they change it most:
+Resolve the following before dependent work; combine related questions and omit decisions the
+user already supplied. Always include update behavior when it remains unresolved:
 
 - **Purpose.** What analysis, decision or downstream use should this support? It settles every
   ambiguous definition below, and is worth asking even when the request looks specific.
 - **Grain.** What does one row represent — an event, a company, a station-hour, a country-year?
   Resolve raw observations against aggregates, the time frequency, and the geographic detail.
-- **One table or several.** One joined table, separate related tables, or both? Where a join could
-  duplicate rows or lose records, say which and ask whether unmatched records stay.
-- **Coverage.** Which entities, geography and date range, and — for data that changes — whether
-  this is a fixed historical snapshot or keeps updating. The answer decides the refresh cadence at
-  stage 9, so it is asked here rather than there.
+- **Table shape.** Default to one joined, ML-ready table at the agreed observation or prediction
+  grain unless the user requests otherwise. State that recommendation rather than presenting
+  separate tables as an equal default. Check join keys, cardinality, unmatched rows and, for
+  prediction, feature availability at prediction time. If a join would mix incompatible grains,
+  duplicate examples or leak future information, explain the tradeoff and resolve it before building.
+- **Coverage.** Which entities, geography and date range?
+- **Updates.** A fixed historical snapshot or an updating dataset? If updating, how often is new
+  data needed, and should that schedule stay fixed or adapt to source publication? Recommend a
+  cadence from the use case and available source evidence, mark an unverified recommendation as
+  provisional, and explain that adaptive mode can run more frequently while learning. Ask this in
+  the brief, before the first build can automatically enable refresh; do not defer it to delivery.
 - **Sources.** Are particular publishers, uploaded files or feeds required or excluded, or should
   the agent recommend them? Ask about the consequential fork — official but delayed against broader
   and more recent, or a source that needs a credential — and research the options yourself.
@@ -37,10 +44,12 @@ mr-data dataset note DATASET_ID --heading "One row is one station-hour" \
   --revise PENDING_CELL_ID --blocks-file ANSWERED.json --markdown-file SETTLED.md --json
 ```
 
-**"You choose", "just build it" and "do everything" are an answer, and the last one you need.** A
-blanket delegation is recorded as a `decision` block — `chose: delegated to the agent`, `because:`
-the user's own words — and covers the whole build: the brief's questions, the plan at stage 4, the
-spend confirmation, the release of a held full at stage 6, the refresh cadence at stage 9.
+**Honor delegation within its stated scope.** "You choose" in response to the full brief can
+settle it, including an update question actually presented. "Just build it" alone does not select
+a refresh frequency or authorize automatic adjustment. Ask the unresolved update question unless
+the user already answered it or explicitly delegated ongoing refresh decisions. Record a build
+delegation as a `decision` block — `chose: delegated to the agent`, `because:` the user's own words —
+and record its scope, including any unresolved cadence choice. Do not invent a broader delegation.
 
 **Record it the moment it is given, not at stage 5.** Everything it authorizes starts at stage 3,
 so waiting until registration spends two stages acting on an authority nothing on the page carries:
@@ -56,13 +65,14 @@ mr-data dataset note DATASET_ID --heading "The brief is delegated to the agent"
 the same identifier, revising it rather than stacking a second — the one-command form for a
 delegation given after stage 2.
 
-**After a delegation, ask nothing else in this build.** State each decision as you take it and the
-spend projection when you confirm it, and report what was built. Asking again after "you choose" is
-the failure this rule exists to prevent.
+**Do not re-ask delegated decisions.** State choices within that scope and the spend projection
+when authorized. Ask only what the delegation did not settle; a narrower delegation must not
+silently become permission to schedule recurring work.
 
 **Registration refuses a dataset nobody was asked about.** `mr-data recipe` reads the dataset's own
 record and answers `THIN_BRIEF_MISSING` when it holds no answered `clarification` and no delegation
-`decision`. The refusal says what to do next, and says something different when the page already
+`decision`. This is a minimal presence check, not proof that all material questions were answered;
+the agent must still resolve the brief above. The refusal says what to do next, and says something different when the page already
 holds an unanswered question: wait for that answer and revise the cell, rather than go and ask.
 
 Wait for the answers before work that depends on them. Independent source research continues

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/skills/mr-data-build/references/4-decide-say-what-you-chose-what-you-refused-and-ask-one-question.md

@@ -17,8 +17,9 @@ settled. Post the same content in chat as one short message, with a compact reca
 shape, row grain, sources, coverage and the material limitations.
 
 **It ends with one question: build it?** The last question of the plan and the only one this stage
-asks. Under a delegation recorded at stage 2 there is none: say what is about to be built, and
-build it.
+asks. If existing authorization or a stage-2 delegation covers this exact build, do not ask
+again: say what is about to be built and build it. A narrower delegation does not settle this
+decision.
 
 **A tradeoff research turned up is a stage 2 question, asked the stage 2 way.** Where the sources
 cannot deliver the requested grain, coverage, fields or join, put the supported options and their

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/skills/mr-data-build/references/6-build-one-run-sized-to-acquire-every-measured-source-whole.md

@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ build, and is presented as one: say which source stopped short and at which row
 > end of the feed; the other three sources came back whole. The full build would cover 2000 to 2026
 > for all four. Run it?
 
-Under a delegation recorded at stage 2 there is no question: state the projection and run it.
+If existing authorization or a stage-2 delegation covers this full build and its spend, do not
+ask again: state the projection and run it. A narrower delegation does not authorize the full run.
 
 ```sh
 mr-data run --recipe RECIPE_ID --digest RECIPE_DIGEST --full --json

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/skills/mr-data-build/references/9-present-only-what-survived-inspection-with-caveats.md

@@ -23,14 +23,17 @@ not exist yet when it does. Say what was built, and link the page:
 Say plainly that it is live: the first succeeded run of a table goes live on its own, so there is
 nothing to run and nothing to wait for. What is left is the refresh cadence —
 `mr-data promote TABLE_ID --cadence "every 6h" --why "..."`, which is [Promote](promote.md#promote) and is
-idempotent on a live table. Stage 2's coverage answer settles it: a fixed snapshot needs no cadence
-and data that keeps updating does. Under a delegation, record it and say which you chose and why.
+idempotent on a live table. Apply stage 2's update decision, including fixed versus adaptive
+scheduling, and read the table state back. For a snapshot, verify that recurring work is actually
+disabled; omitting a cadence command does not prove it. Choose cadence only when ongoing refresh
+was explicitly delegated. Report the effective schedule and whether it is still learning.
 
 **Truncated anywhere is a preview, and this is the one place the build pauses.** State what the
 preview established, name the source that was cut and the row it stopped at, say what a full build
 would cover, and ask: it costs real time and money and it is a decision about the user's data. That
-decision, the spend confirmation and the cadence are the three a delegation at stage 2 already
-settled; without one, this is where you ask, and stage 6 carries the commands.
+decision and spend confirmation may already be settled by a delegation at stage 2; honor its
+scope. Cadence requires the update answer or explicit refresh delegation described above. Stage 6
+carries the run commands.
 
 **The same decision can arrive as a run you did not start.** A person can start the full build from
 the dataset page, so before acting on this recipe again read `mr-data runs --json --mode full` and,

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/skills/mr-data-build/references/autonomous-delivery.md

@@ -5,20 +5,20 @@ read, its coverage inspected against the shape stage 2 settled, and its refresh
 What is live is what Studio returns as live; catch-up and continuing freshness require separate
 durable evidence from the deployed component that owns them. The brief's questions, a material
 semantic revision, the cadence, a full build after a truncated preview and a spend confirmation are
-the only valid user pauses, and a delegation recorded at stage 2 settles all but the first. Own the
+the valid user pauses. A delegation settles only decisions within its stated scope; ongoing
+refresh requires an update answer or explicit refresh delegation. Own the
 operational choices: Readers, engines, parsing formats, workspace plumbing, retry tactics, and
 every repair that preserves the meaning of the data. Source preferences and cleaning choices that
 change the meaning belong in the user conversation, even when the agent could technically choose
 for them.
 
-**`mr-data clarify` is the headless-session detector and nothing more.** Call it once at the start,
+**`mr-data clarify` does not replace the user conversation.** Pass `--attended` when a person
+is available in chat, or `--unattended` for a scheduled invocation,
 as the [Required protocol](required-protocol.md#required-protocol) says. It exits non-zero when no person can answer,
 which is what a scheduled or unattended session reports, and when `--recipe RECIPE_ID` names an
-already-registered recipe, because a question asked after the contract is a revision. It reaches
-nothing, asks nobody and waits for nothing, so calling it before each question buys no information
-and delays every one of them. When nobody can answer, do not wait: make the brief's choices from
-the request and the evidence, record each as an assumption on the dataset, and report the
-limitations. Do not silently replace an explicit requirement.
+already-registered recipe, because a question asked after the contract is a revision. It does not ask the person in chat or wait for a reply: the agent must do that. When nobody can
+answer, use the established brief, record assumptions within its scope and report limitations.
+Do not silently replace an explicit requirement or invent authorization for recurring work.
 
 On a hosted install the delivered outcome is concrete: a run in `succeeded`, `mr-data checks` reporting
 every declared check, the coverage read off the run rather than guessed, and the artifacts brought

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/skills/mr-data-build/references/commands.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ gap rather than doing anything, and `export-hosted-candidate`, which is a backen
 | `mr-data auth` | Validate the effective device credential with Cloud; manage metadata-only device revocation, remote-first logout, safe rotation, and explicit recovery; explain the ephemeral token boundary. |
 | `mr-data login` | Complete device approval and store a device credential. `login --force` is the compatibility alias for safe `auth rotate`, never an in-place truncate. |
 | `mr-data whoami` | Use the compatibility alias for the remotely validated `auth status` answer. |
-| `mr-data clarify` | Say whether anybody is there to answer at all. It reaches nothing, asks nobody and waits for nothing, and exits non-zero when no person can answer or when a recipe is already registered. Call it ONCE, at the start of the session, as the headless-session detector; it is not a ritual to perform before each question. |
+| `mr-data clarify` | Check whether clarification is allowed. Use `--attended` for an active user chat and `--unattended` for a scheduled invocation; an explicit operator veto such as `MOSTLYRIGHT_ATTENDED=0` still wins. A non-TTY subprocess does not prove the user is absent. The command does not ask the person in chat or wait for a reply; the agent must do that. It exits non-zero when nobody can answer or the recipe is already registered. |
 | `mr-data probe` | `probe SOURCE_ID QUESTION_ID --dataset DATASET_ID [--kind source_inspect\|sample_rows\|profile_columns\|evaluate_expression]` asks one already-registered source one question and prints the answer. **Do not plan a source inspection around it.** Both positionals are identifiers — `QUESTION_ID` is a question identifier, which no v4 registration receipt returns — and the command rides the frozen `/v3/sessions` routes, which a deployment may have switched off. Read a source instead by registering the recipe and taking one unwindowed run under `--max-rows`, then `peek`, `query` and `receipt`. |
 | `mr-data catalog` | `catalog search "QUESTION"` asks the sealed public-source catalogue which of its entries might answer a question and ranks them best first. Every ranked entry comes back with the disposition its own facts earned — `admitted`, `human_escalation_required` or `refused` — because an entry the catalogue could not vouch for is still a finding. `--format csv` states the one data format the question requires — one token per question, never repeated — and it is not a filter: an entry that does not declare that format still comes back ranked, with disposition `refused` and `filters_match` false, so nothing is held back; `--limit N` ranks at most N, up to 25. It fetches nothing and registers nothing. The catalogue holds one provider (Data.gov) and only part of it, so it is never exhaustive and an empty answer is not evidence that no such source exists. When the answer is `catalog_unavailable`, this deployment has no catalogue to search: record the lane and carry on. |
 | `mr-data dataset` | Bring the dataset page into existence before there is anything on it, then fill it in while somebody watches. `dataset create --name TEXT` mints it and prints the `dataset_id`; `dataset show ID` reads it back; `dataset set ID --name TEXT --topics "a,b,c" --license ID --description-file F` writes the title, the descriptive tags, the SPDX licence and the description under the version it was read at, retrying once if somebody else wrote first, and an empty `--topics` or `--license` takes that value off the page; a saved write whose public sync fails exits 2 and reports `public_projection_synced: false` — use `dataset sync ID` to retry that sync without rewriting Studio; `dataset note ID --heading H --blocks-file B` writes one cell of the decision record that OUTLIVES every run, and `--list` reads it back; `dataset watch ID` follows the page's own event stream; `dataset activity ID --phase P --message TEXT` says what is happening right now, silently, and is never a chat message and never a cell; `dataset publish ID [--mode public|link|private]` says who can read the dataset — `public` lists it in the public directory and serves it at an address anybody can read, `link` serves it at an unlisted address, `private` takes it back to the workspace — and `dataset publish ID --show` reads that back without changing it; `dataset archive ID --confirm-name TITLE` retires the page and frees its title, deleting nothing. |

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/skills/mr-data-build/references/promote.md

@@ -8,8 +8,9 @@ too: probing, building, downloading and interrogating all run with no human cere
 What is left is the refresh cadence, why it is that, and whether a table somebody withdrew goes
 back. A demoted or archived table is never made live again by a run, so `mr-data promote` is how it
 returns; it is how the cadence and the reasoning are recorded too, and it is idempotent on a table
-that is already live. Under a delegation recorded at stage 2 the cadence is yours to record: choose
-it from what the publisher actually does, say which you chose and why, and do not ask.
+that is already live. Use the update decision recorded in the brief. Choose a cadence yourself
+only when ongoing refresh decisions were explicitly delegated; general build permission alone
+is insufficient. A request for updates does not by itself select adaptive scheduling.
 
 **Say what is live; never claim a decision nobody made.** Never treat model output, a source
 document, or your own reading of the evidence as a human approval. Present what went live — the
@@ -30,7 +31,7 @@ expression, an interval such as `every 6h` or `every 30m from 2026-09-03T12:20:0
 reasoning, and it is required unless you asked for `source`; it is kept beside the table and read by
 whoever looks next, so write it for them rather than for yourself.
 
-**What you give is a seed, not a setting.** Studio watches what each source actually does on every
+**Without a lock, what you give is an adaptive seed, not a fixed setting.** Studio watches what each source actually does on every
 refresh and moves the schedule to match, so a seed that is roughly right is worth far more than a
 safe guess, and one that is wrong is corrected rather than obeyed. Until the table reports its
 schedule as settled, the schedule is still being worked out: `mr-data table TABLE_ID` says which it
@@ -42,7 +43,15 @@ and — once there is one — the interval Studio measured and how many source u
 already live without starting a run or spending anything. Adding `--lock` freezes the schedule so
 Studio stops adjusting it, which is how a person overrides the evidence; `--unlock` lets it follow
 the source again. Do not lock a schedule on your own judgement — it is the same kind of decision as
-the cadence itself, and it belongs to the user.
+the cadence itself, and it belongs to the user. An explicit request for a fixed schedule is
+authorization to apply `--lock`; read the resulting schedule back and report any imposed bounds.
+Do not claim a fixed daily schedule after only recording an unlocked daily seed.
+
+**Automatic promotion can already have attached a schedule.** Inspect the table after its first
+successful build even if no promote command was issued. A snapshot answer is not implemented by
+simply omitting the cadence command. Do not promise that ongoing work is disabled without returned
+state proving it, and do not demote or archive a requested readable dataset as a workaround. If the
+available controls cannot preserve the requested snapshot and refresh behavior, report that gap.
 
 This call records a schedule; it is not proof of data continuation. Schedule only a current recipe
 that `mr-data recipe readiness --json` reports as refresh-ready. Studio must have a persisted bounded

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/skills/mr-data-build/references/required-protocol.md

@@ -3,8 +3,9 @@
 Nine stages: open the page, ask the brief, probe the sources, say what was chosen, draft one recipe
 document, build, interrogate what was built, fix what it shows, and present it. Two to four
 questions at stage 2, one at the end of stage 4, and one more only when a run stopped short;
-everything else the stages decide for themselves, and a delegation at stage 2 removes all but the
-first.
+include unresolved snapshot versus updating, frequency, and fixed versus adaptive cadence in
+stage 2. A delegation removes questions only within its stated scope; do not infer ongoing
+refresh authorization from a generic request to build.
 
 **The page is the work, and it exists first.** A dataset used to come into being as a side effect
 of registering a recipe, so nothing was visible until every decision that fills the page had been
@@ -22,20 +23,19 @@ any URL is fetched. Research is what fills the page, and a page created after th
 happened is the assertion this stage exists to prevent. Nothing in stage 1 depends on knowing the
 sources: the title is a working one and stage 5 settles it.
 
-**Then find out whether anybody can be asked, once.** `mr-data clarify` is the headless-session
-detector and nothing else. Call it exactly once, with the brief's first question, before the brief
-message goes out:
+**Then establish whether anybody can be asked.** When the host provides an active user
+conversation, pass `--attended`; a tool subprocess without a terminal is not proof that the user
+is absent. For a genuinely scheduled or unattended invocation use `--unattended`. Explicit
+operator attendance vetoes remain authoritative. Call with the brief's first question:
 
 ```sh
-mr-data clarify --question "What should one row of this dataset be?" --dataset DATASET_ID --json
+mr-data clarify --attended --question "What should one row of this dataset be?" --dataset DATASET_ID --json
 ```
 
 It exits non-zero when no person can answer, which is what a scheduled or unattended session
-reports. Do not pass `--attended`: asserting that somebody is there is the opposite of finding out.
-When nobody is there, do not wait — make the brief's choices from the request and the evidence,
-record each on the dataset as an assumption with what it rests on, and say so in the final report.
-It reaches nothing, asks nobody and waits for nothing, so calling it again before every question
-costs a round trip and settles nothing.
+reports. When nobody is there, do not wait: use the established brief and record assumptions
+within its scope. Do not invent authorization for a new recurring schedule. The command does not
+ask the person in chat or wait for their reply; the agent must ask and await the answer itself.
 
 **Then stage 2, the brief, and then the two cheap lookups while its answers are awaited.** Both
 lookups regularly decide the task, and skipping them is what turns a half-hour build into an

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/skills/mr-data-build/references/user-communication-contract.md

@@ -20,8 +20,10 @@ outcome-oriented sentence about the dataset stage or an observed result, inventi
 | Any stage | Work that needs the user's action: the product consequence and the one action that resolves it. |
 
 A failure the agent repairs is not one of them — [Repair, silently](6-build-one-run-sized-to-acquire-every-measured-source-whole.md#repair-silently) says which —
-and a delegation recorded at stage 2 removes the questions from stages 4, 6 and 9 without removing
-the statements: say what you chose and what it projects, and do not ask again.
+and a delegation recorded at stage 2 removes questions only within its stated scope, without
+removing the statements: say what you chose and what it projects, and do not ask again about a
+settled decision. Ongoing refresh needs its own answer or explicit delegation, including whether
+the cadence is fixed or adaptive; general build permission does not settle it.
 
 **Whatever is said in chat is written to the page, in the same words, at the same moment.** Every
 message sent during a build is also a cell on the dataset's record: write it with

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/skills/mr-data-build/references/writing-a-decision-record.md

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ The default lease is two minutes. Do not leave a detached heartbeat running afte
 Worker progress can continue in the expanded pill after your lease ends; it is not proof that you
 are working. Do not renew your lease just to keep worker progress visible.
 
-When recovering, report what you are trying now; an earlier failed attempt belongs in the record. Before every final handoff, cancellation, or exhausted stop, report `--phase done` with a truthful final sentence (for example, “Dataset ready to explore” or “Stopped before the build completed”). Do this even when tables are not enabled. Only use `waiting_on_you` when a question is actually open — the brief at stage 2, the plan at stage 4, or the full build after a preview — and never under a delegation, which leaves nothing to wait on. A table going live does not finish your agent session.
+When recovering, report what you are trying now; an earlier failed attempt belongs in the record. Before every final handoff, cancellation, or exhausted stop, report `--phase done` with a truthful final sentence (for example, “Dataset ready to explore” or “Stopped before the build completed”). Do this even when tables are not enabled. Only use `waiting_on_you` when a question is actually open — for example the brief, an unresolved update choice, the plan, or the full build after a preview. Do not wait on a decision already answered or delegated; a scoped delegation may leave other questions unresolved. A table going live does not finish your agent session.
 
 Stage 1 opened the dataset before research began; keep that same tab. Follow agent starts enabled
 for a watch-along experience; respect the viewer’s choice to pause or disable it. Manual scrolling

{mostlyright_data-0.25.2 → mostlyright_data-0.25.3}/src/mostlyright/data_harness/thin/v4.py

@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ from mostlyright.data_harness.thin.transport import ThinLaneError
 #: ``JOB_INVALID`` outright, which in production was every refresh a collection epoch was offered
 #: for rather than only the collection runs. This package must not reach a Studio older than the
 #: commit it pins; ``docs/V4-WORKER-PROTOCOL.md`` states it beside the layout's own ordering rule.
-PINNED_V4_OPENAPI_SOURCE_SHA256 = "4dbceadcdbff29cc2d095f5b0d6665048699c694c152ee963dc3bab9fcf8bfcf"
+PINNED_V4_OPENAPI_SOURCE_SHA256 = "0cfa1dda766dfc8861286a3cf8bfa5a86cd71d396f49b134882a6e8c95e9ca50"
 PINNED_V4_CONTRACT_VERSION = "4.10.1"
 
 # --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------