mergeron 2024.739097.1__tar.gz → 2024.739097.3__tar.gz

{mergeron-2024.739097.1 → mergeron-2024.739097.3}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.1
 Name: mergeron
-Version: 2024.739097.1
+Version: 2024.739097.3
 Summary: Merger Policy Analysis using Python
 License: MIT
 Keywords: merger policy analysis,merger guidelines,merger screening,policy presumptions,concentration standards,upward pricing pressure,GUPPI
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ mergeron: Merger Policy Analysis using Python
 
 Analyze the sets of mergers conforming to concentration and diversion ratio bounds. Analyze intrinsic enforcement rates, and intrinsic clearance rates, under concentration, diversion ratio, GUPPI, CMCR, and IPR bounds using generated data with specified distributions of market shares, price-cost margins, firm counts, and prices, optionally imposing restrictions impled by statutory filing thresholds and/or Bertrand-Nash oligopoly with MNL demand. Download and analyze merger investigations data published by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission in various reports on extended merger investigations (Second Requests) during 1996 to 2011.
 
-Intrinsic enforcement rates and intrinsice clearance rates are distinguished from *observed* clearance and enforcement rates in that the former are derived from analyzing theorectical predictions regarding firm conduct against enforcement thresholds, treating enforcement policy as exogenous to firm conduct. Depending on the merger enforcement regime, or merger control regime, intrinsic enforcement rates may also not be the complement of intrinsic clearance rates, i.e, it is not necessarily true that the intrinsic clearance rate estimate for a given enforcement regime is 1 minus the intrinsic enforcement rate. In contrast, observed enforcement rates reflect the deterrent effects of merger enforcement on firm conduct as well as the effects of merger screening on the level of enforcement, and, ny definition, the observed clearance rate is 1 minus the observed enforement rate.
+Intrinsic enforcement rates and intrinsice clearance rates are distinguished from *observed* clearance and enforcement rates in that the former are derived from analyzing theorectical predictions regarding firm conduct against enforcement thresholds, treating enforcement policy as exogenous to firm conduct. Depending on the merger enforcement regime, or merger control regime, intrinsic enforcement rates may also not be the complement of intrinsic clearance rates, i.e, it is not necessarily true that the intrinsic clearance rate estimate for a given enforcement regime is 1 minus the intrinsic enforcement rate. In contrast, observed enforcement rates reflect the deterrent effects of merger enforcement on firm conduct as well as the effects of merger screening on the level of enforcement, and, by definition, the observed clearance rate is 1 minus the observed enforement rate.
 
 Introduction
 ------------
@@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ Documentation for this package is in the form of the API Reference. Documentatio
 
     help(market_sample.MarketSample)
 
-''Extras'' Subpackage
+"Extras" Subpackage
 ---------------------
 
-This module includes a small number of modules potentially useful to users, but which do not implement the principal functions of the package, and are hence considered ''extras''  or ''external'' modules. One of these modules is, in fact, repackaged here although published independently.
+The "Extras" sub-package includes a small number of modules potentially useful to users, but which do not implement the principal functions of the package, and are hence considered "extras"  or "external" modules. One of these modules is, in fact, repackaged here although published independently.
 
 On of the external modules provides methods for estimating confidence intervals for proportions and for contrasts (differences) in proportions. This module  improve is coded for conformance to the literature and to results from the corresponding modules in :code:`R`. Although written from scratch, the APIs implemented in the module included here are designed for consistency with the APIs in, :code:`statsmodels.stats.proportion` from the package, :code:`statsmodels` (https://pypi.org/project/statsmodels/). To access these directly:
 

{mergeron-2024.739097.1 → mergeron-2024.739097.3}/README.rst

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ mergeron: Merger Policy Analysis using Python
 
 Analyze the sets of mergers conforming to concentration and diversion ratio bounds. Analyze intrinsic enforcement rates, and intrinsic clearance rates, under concentration, diversion ratio, GUPPI, CMCR, and IPR bounds using generated data with specified distributions of market shares, price-cost margins, firm counts, and prices, optionally imposing restrictions impled by statutory filing thresholds and/or Bertrand-Nash oligopoly with MNL demand. Download and analyze merger investigations data published by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission in various reports on extended merger investigations (Second Requests) during 1996 to 2011.
 
-Intrinsic enforcement rates and intrinsice clearance rates are distinguished from *observed* clearance and enforcement rates in that the former are derived from analyzing theorectical predictions regarding firm conduct against enforcement thresholds, treating enforcement policy as exogenous to firm conduct. Depending on the merger enforcement regime, or merger control regime, intrinsic enforcement rates may also not be the complement of intrinsic clearance rates, i.e, it is not necessarily true that the intrinsic clearance rate estimate for a given enforcement regime is 1 minus the intrinsic enforcement rate. In contrast, observed enforcement rates reflect the deterrent effects of merger enforcement on firm conduct as well as the effects of merger screening on the level of enforcement, and, ny definition, the observed clearance rate is 1 minus the observed enforement rate.
+Intrinsic enforcement rates and intrinsice clearance rates are distinguished from *observed* clearance and enforcement rates in that the former are derived from analyzing theorectical predictions regarding firm conduct against enforcement thresholds, treating enforcement policy as exogenous to firm conduct. Depending on the merger enforcement regime, or merger control regime, intrinsic enforcement rates may also not be the complement of intrinsic clearance rates, i.e, it is not necessarily true that the intrinsic clearance rate estimate for a given enforcement regime is 1 minus the intrinsic enforcement rate. In contrast, observed enforcement rates reflect the deterrent effects of merger enforcement on firm conduct as well as the effects of merger screening on the level of enforcement, and, by definition, the observed clearance rate is 1 minus the observed enforement rate.
 
 Introduction
 ------------
@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ Documentation for this package is in the form of the API Reference. Documentatio
 
     help(market_sample.MarketSample)
 
-''Extras'' Subpackage
+"Extras" Subpackage
 ---------------------
 
-This module includes a small number of modules potentially useful to users, but which do not implement the principal functions of the package, and are hence considered ''extras''  or ''external'' modules. One of these modules is, in fact, repackaged here although published independently.
+The "Extras" sub-package includes a small number of modules potentially useful to users, but which do not implement the principal functions of the package, and are hence considered "extras"  or "external" modules. One of these modules is, in fact, repackaged here although published independently.
 
 On of the external modules provides methods for estimating confidence intervals for proportions and for contrasts (differences) in proportions. This module  improve is coded for conformance to the literature and to results from the corresponding modules in :code:`R`. Although written from scratch, the APIs implemented in the module included here are designed for consistency with the APIs in, :code:`statsmodels.stats.proportion` from the package, :code:`statsmodels` (https://pypi.org/project/statsmodels/). To access these directly:
 

{mergeron-2024.739097.1 → mergeron-2024.739097.3}/pyproject.toml

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ keywords = [
     "upward pricing pressure",
     "GUPPI",
 ]
-version = "2024.739097.1"
+version = "2024.739097.3"
 
 # Classifiers list: https://pypi.org/classifiers/
 classifiers = [

{mergeron-2024.739097.1 → mergeron-2024.739097.3}/src/mergeron/__init__.py

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ import numpy as np
 
 _PKG_NAME: str = Path(__file__).parent.stem
 
-VERSION = "2024.739097.1"
+VERSION = "2024.739097.3"
 
 __version__ = VERSION