maskflow-cli 0.2.0__tar.gz → 0.3.0__tar.gz

{maskflow_cli-0.2.0 → maskflow_cli-0.3.0}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.5
 Name: maskflow-cli
-Version: 0.2.0
+Version: 0.3.0
 Summary: Command-line interface for MaskFlow: .maskflowrc config validation and inspection
 License: MIT
 Requires-Python: >=3.10
-Requires-Dist: maskflow-core[yaml]<0.5,>=0.4.0
-Requires-Dist: maskflow-pack-india<0.2,>=0.1.0
+Requires-Dist: maskflow-core[yaml]<0.6,>=0.5.0
+Requires-Dist: maskflow-pack-india<0.4,>=0.1.0
 Requires-Dist: maskflow-pack-intl<0.3,>=0.2.0
 Requires-Dist: rich>=13.0
 Requires-Dist: tomli-w>=1.0

{maskflow_cli-0.2.0 → maskflow_cli-0.3.0}/pyproject.toml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 [project]
 name = "maskflow-cli"
-version = "0.2.0"
+version = "0.3.0"
 description = "Command-line interface for MaskFlow: .maskflowrc config validation and inspection"
 readme = "README.md"
 requires-python = ">=3.10"
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ dependencies = [
     # maskflow_core.config, which only exists from core 0.3.0 -- [yaml]
     # since the CLI, unlike the SDK, should accept a YAML .maskflowrc out
     # of the box (it's already a heavier, more optional install than the SDK).
-    "maskflow-core[yaml]>=0.4.0,<0.5",
+    "maskflow-core[yaml]>=0.5.0,<0.6",
     # maskflow_pack_intl is imported (side-effect only, to populate the
     # PIIType registry) for `maskflow config validate`'s soft entity-name
     # cross-check -- see app.py. pack-intl 0.1.0 itself requires core<0.3,
@@ -19,7 +19,12 @@ dependencies = [
     "maskflow-pack-intl>=0.2.0,<0.3",
     # Same reasoning as pack-intl above, for AADHAAR/PAN/GSTIN/IFSC/UPI_VPA
     # -- also makes `maskflow doctor`/`maskflow explain` aware of them.
-    "maskflow-pack-india>=0.1.0,<0.2",
+    # 0.2.0 adds INDIAN_MOBILE/PIN_CODE/VOTER_ID/INDIAN_PASSPORT/
+    # DRIVING_LICENCE/VEHICLE_REG/ABHA_NUMBER/ABHA_ADDRESS/BANK_ACCOUNT_IN;
+    # 0.3.0 adds PERSON_NAME (Indian)/INDIAN_ADDRESS (gazetteer + structural
+    # + NLP-agreement layers). Both additive only -- no API change, so the
+    # existing lower bound still holds.
+    "maskflow-pack-india>=0.1.0,<0.4",
     "typer>=0.12",
     # CLI-only: pretty-prints `maskflow config show`'s plain TOML dump.
     "tomli-w>=1.0",

{maskflow_cli-0.2.0 → maskflow_cli-0.3.0}/tests/test_cli_explain.py

@@ -55,14 +55,17 @@ def test_explain_lowering_threshold_via_set_promotes_a_near_miss_to_masked() ->
     text = "Random unrelated text with a number 123456789 in it, nothing special."
     result = runner.invoke(app, ["explain", "--set", "entities.SSN.threshold=0.3", text])
     assert result.exit_code == 0
-    assert "NEAREST MISSES" not in result.stdout
-    assert "SSN" in result.stdout
     assert "masked" in result.stdout
+    # SSN itself moved out of the near-miss section and into the masked
+    # section above it -- maskflow-pack-india's BANK_ACCOUNT_IN (9-18
+    # digits, always context-required) is a separate, still-legitimate
+    # near miss on this same bare 9-digit span, so "no near misses at all"
+    # isn't the right assertion here.
+    assert "[1] SSN" in result.stdout
+    assert "[entities.SSN]" not in result.stdout
 
 
 def test_explain_bad_config_exits_nonzero(fixtures_dir: Path) -> None:
-    result = runner.invoke(
-        app, ["explain", "--config", str(fixtures_dir / "typo.toml"), "hello"]
-    )
+    result = runner.invoke(app, ["explain", "--config", str(fixtures_dir / "typo.toml"), "hello"])
     assert result.exit_code == 1
     assert "did you mean 'threshold'?" in result.stderr