maintainability-agent 0.1.0__tar.gz

maintainability_agent-0.1.0/LICENSE

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+MIT License
+
+Copyright (c) 2026 Marshall Guillory
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.

maintainability_agent-0.1.0/PKG-INFO

@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+Metadata-Version: 2.4
+Name: maintainability-agent
+Version: 0.1.0
+Summary: Maintainability gate and AI remediation prompt generator for CI.
+Author: Marshall Guillory
+License: MIT
+Keywords: maintainability,ci,audit,quality,iso-25010,ai-code-review
+Classifier: Development Status :: 3 - Alpha
+Classifier: Environment :: Console
+Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
+Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3 :: Only
+Classifier: Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance
+Requires-Python: >=3.10
+Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
+License-File: LICENSE
+Provides-Extra: test
+Requires-Dist: pytest>=8; extra == "test"
+Requires-Dist: pytest-cov>=5; extra == "test"
+Requires-Dist: jsonschema>=4; extra == "test"
+Provides-Extra: dev
+Requires-Dist: pytest>=8; extra == "dev"
+Requires-Dist: pytest-cov>=5; extra == "dev"
+Requires-Dist: jsonschema>=4; extra == "dev"
+Requires-Dist: ruff>=0.5; extra == "dev"
+Requires-Dist: pip-audit>=2.7; extra == "dev"
+Dynamic: license-file
+
+# Maintainability Agent
+
+A deterministic CI gate + bounded remediation prompt generator for repos that use AI coding agents (Claude, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Windsurf, …).
+
+## Why this exists
+
+AI-written code fails in recognizable ways: speculative refactors, duplicated helpers, broad rewrites for narrow bugs, stale comments that sound confident, tests that assert implementation details instead of behavior, architecture drift across modules. SonarQube / CodeClimate / Qlty / ESLint / Ruff / Radon all catch some of this. None of them ship a **bounded prompt back to the agent** that says *"fix only these specific findings, do not refactor outside this scope."*
+
+That's the point of this tool:
+
+1. Run a deterministic local audit — file size, function size, approximate cyclomatic complexity, duplication, configurable risk patterns, ISO/IEC 25010-inspired 0–5 score.
+2. Emit Markdown, JSON, SARIF, a PR comment, and a baseline for incremental adoption.
+3. Generate an **AI remediation prompt scoped to the actual findings** — bounded, with explicit "don't rewrite the codebase" rules.
+4. Hand that prompt to your agent. Get a small, reviewable fix instead of a 600-line speculative cleanup PR.
+
+The remediation prompt is the differentiator. Every other tool in this space stops at "here's a list of findings."
+
+## Who it's for
+
+- Teams running AI agents in the dev loop who are tired of unbounded agent rewrites and want a CI gate that actively constrains follow-up scope.
+- Repos that want a maintainability gate without paying for SonarQube / CodeClimate / Qlty or sending code to a third party.
+- Solo devs who want a single-binary deterministic audit they can pin in a Makefile, a pre-commit, or a local CI script.
+
+## Design principles
+
+- **Deterministic first, AI optional.** The audit never calls an LLM by default. The remediation prompt is a generated artifact that you choose to hand to an agent.
+- **Bounded scope.** The remediation prompt explicitly tells the agent to fix the listed findings only — not to embark on architecture cleanup.
+- **No vendor lock-in.** All outputs (Markdown, JSON, SARIF, PR comment) are plain files. Pair this tool with mature analyzers (ESLint, Ruff, Radon, Semgrep, SonarQube, Qlty/Code Climate) — don't replace them.
+- **Pass-the-cost-of-disclosure.** A finding that's "just a warning" never blocks CI alone. Hard gates are configurable + opt-in.
+
+See [docs/philosophy.md](docs/philosophy.md) for the longer version.
+
+## Self-Audit
+
+This repo eats its own dogfood — the tool is run against this codebase as part of CI, and the latest report is checked in at [docs/self-audit.md](docs/self-audit.md):
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|---|---:|
+| Overall score | **5.0 / 5 (A+)** |
+| File warnings | 0 |
+| Function warnings | 0 |
+| Duplicate blocks | 0 |
+| Risk findings | 0 |
+| Hard gate failures | 0 |
+
+All five ISO/IEC 25010 categories (modularity, reusability, analyzability, modifiability, testability) score 5.0. Regenerate with `maintainability-agent --config maintainability-agent.json --output docs/self-audit.md` (see the file's preamble for the path-sanitization step).
+
+## Install
+
+Run directly from source:
+
+```bash
+python3 -m maintainability_audit \
+  --root . \
+  --config maintainability-agent.json \
+  --output maintainability-report.md
+```
+
+Or install editable during development:
+
+```bash
+python3 -m pip install -e .
+maintainability-audit --root . --config maintainability-agent.json
+maintainability-agent --root . --config maintainability-agent.json
+```
+
+## Quick Start
+
+Copy the example config to your repo root as `maintainability-agent.json`:
+
+```bash
+cp maintainability-audit.example.json maintainability-agent.json
+```
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+maintainability-agent \
+  --config maintainability-agent.json \
+  --format markdown \
+  --output maintainability-report.md
+```
+
+Fail CI on hard gates:
+
+```bash
+maintainability-agent \
+  --config maintainability-agent.json \
+  --fail-on-gate \
+  --output maintainability-report.md \
+  --prompt-output maintainability-remediation-prompt.md \
+  --comment-output maintainability-pr-comment.md
+```
+
+## What It Analyzes
+
+The deterministic scanner reads code from your repo (no LLM calls) and produces signals on:
+
+- largest files (warn / fail thresholds configurable per-repo)
+- approximate function/class size
+- approximate cyclomatic complexity
+- duplicate blocks (≥ N consecutive non-trivial lines, configurable)
+- configurable risk patterns (regex matchers — TODO/FIXME, `eval(`, `exec(`, custom)
+- expected files present (README, LICENSE, etc. — opt-in hard gate)
+- expected test/lint commands declared in the config (opt-in hard gate)
+- worktree-clean state at audit time (opt-in hard gate)
+- ISO/IEC 25010-inspired 0–5 score per category + overall letter grade
+
+The analyzer is intentionally conservative and dependency-free. Mature repos should **pair** this with native tools (ESLint, Ruff, Radon, Semgrep, SonarQube, Qlty / Code Climate) — not replace them. SARIF input from those tools can be folded into this tool's report via `--sarif-input`.
+
+## What It Produces
+
+Each run can emit any combination of:
+
+- `maintainability-report.md` — the full Markdown report with summary, score, hotspots, duplicates, risk findings, external (SARIF) findings.
+- `maintainability-remediation-prompt.md` — bounded AI prompt scoped to the run's findings.
+- `maintainability-pr-comment.md` — short body suitable for a `gh pr comment` post.
+- `maintainability.sarif` — SARIF 2.1.0 output for GitHub Code Scanning ingestion.
+- `maintainability-baseline.json` — fingerprints of current findings, for `--fail-on-new` incremental adoption.
+- Per-tool agent instruction files (`AGENTS.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, `.cursor/rules/maintainability.mdc`, `.github/copilot-instructions.md`, `.windsurf/rules/maintainability.md`, `AI-MAINTAINABILITY.md`) via `--init-agent-standards`.
+
+## AI Remediation Prompt
+
+The runner can generate a bounded prompt for a human developer to give to Claude, Codex, or another coding assistant:
+
+```bash
+maintainability-agent \
+  --config maintainability-agent.json \
+  --output maintainability-report.md \
+  --prompt-output maintainability-remediation-prompt.md
+```
+
+The prompt is designed for AI-written or AI-assisted code reviews. It tells the assistant to:
+
+- fix only the highest-value maintainability issues
+- keep the patch small and reviewable
+- preserve existing architecture and behavior
+- add tests where behavior changes
+- report false positives instead of rewriting blindly
+
+This makes the CI artifact actionable without letting the audit turn into an unbounded refactor request.
+
+## PR and Baseline Workflows
+
+PR-only audits, baseline grandfathering, AI-agent instruction
+generation, and reusable agent-standard file generation are covered
+in [PR and Baseline Workflows](docs/pr-and-baseline-workflows.md).
+
+## Running Tests
+
+```bash
+# Sandbox-friendly invocation (works with PYTEST_DISABLE_PLUGIN_AUTOLOAD=1):
+PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m pytest
+
+# With coverage gate (matches CI):
+PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m pytest \
+  --cov=maintainability_audit --cov-fail-under=92
+
+# With ruff lint + pip-audit (matches CI):
+python3 -m pip install -e ".[dev]"
+ruff check src tests
+pip-audit
+PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m pytest --cov=maintainability_audit --cov-fail-under=92
+```
+
+Coverage is intentionally NOT in `[tool.pytest.ini_options].addopts` so the
+sandbox-friendly invocation (`PYTEST_DISABLE_PLUGIN_AUTOLOAD=1`) doesn't choke
+on `--cov` flags it can't load. Pass coverage flags explicitly when you want
+the gate.
+
+## Scoring Standard
+
+The audit model is based on ISO/IEC 25010 maintainability:
+
+- modularity
+- reusability
+- analyzability
+- modifiability
+- testability
+
+See [docs/standard.md](docs/standard.md).
+
+## Documentation
+
+- [CLI reference](docs/cli.md)
+- [Config schema](docs/config-schema.md)
+- [Philosophy](docs/philosophy.md)
+- [Analyzer adapters](docs/adapters.md)
+- [External quality tools](docs/external-quality-tools.md)
+- [IDE and agent integration](docs/ide-agent-integration.md)
+- [PR and baseline workflows](docs/pr-and-baseline-workflows.md)
+- [Roadmap](docs/roadmap.md)
+
+## GitHub Action
+
+This repo includes `action.yml`, so it can be used as a composite action after publishing:
+
+```yaml
+- uses: marshallguillory86/maintainability-agent@v0.1.0
+  with:
+    config: maintainability-agent.json
+    changed-only: main...HEAD
+```
+
+## GitHub Actions
+
+After publishing, copy `.github/workflows/maintainability.yml` into the target repo or adapt it for your local CI.
+
+## IDE and Agent Integration
+
+See [docs/ide-agent-integration.md](docs/ide-agent-integration.md) for VS Code tasks and integration notes for Copilot, Cursor, Codex, Claude Code, Windsurf, generic agents, local CI, and GitHub Actions.
+
+## Local CI
+
+For repos that do not use GitHub Actions, use:
+
+```bash
+examples/local-ci.sh
+```
+
+The local CI script enforces test coverage at `>=92%` and writes `coverage.xml` for SonarQube Cloud, Qlty, Codacy, or any other tool that can ingest Python coverage.
+
+## Get in Touch
+
+- **Bug reports / feature requests / general questions** — open a [GitHub Issue](https://github.com/marshallguillory86/maintainability-agent/issues/new).
+- **Discussion / ideas** — use the [Discussions tab](https://github.com/marshallguillory86/maintainability-agent/discussions) (enable in repo settings if not visible yet).
+- **Security vulnerabilities** — see [`SECURITY.md`](SECURITY.md) and use the [private security advisory flow](https://github.com/marshallguillory86/maintainability-agent/security/advisories/new). Do **not** post vulnerabilities in public issues.
+
+## License
+
+MIT

maintainability_agent-0.1.0/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
+# Maintainability Agent
+
+A deterministic CI gate + bounded remediation prompt generator for repos that use AI coding agents (Claude, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Windsurf, …).
+
+## Why this exists
+
+AI-written code fails in recognizable ways: speculative refactors, duplicated helpers, broad rewrites for narrow bugs, stale comments that sound confident, tests that assert implementation details instead of behavior, architecture drift across modules. SonarQube / CodeClimate / Qlty / ESLint / Ruff / Radon all catch some of this. None of them ship a **bounded prompt back to the agent** that says *"fix only these specific findings, do not refactor outside this scope."*
+
+That's the point of this tool:
+
+1. Run a deterministic local audit — file size, function size, approximate cyclomatic complexity, duplication, configurable risk patterns, ISO/IEC 25010-inspired 0–5 score.
+2. Emit Markdown, JSON, SARIF, a PR comment, and a baseline for incremental adoption.
+3. Generate an **AI remediation prompt scoped to the actual findings** — bounded, with explicit "don't rewrite the codebase" rules.
+4. Hand that prompt to your agent. Get a small, reviewable fix instead of a 600-line speculative cleanup PR.
+
+The remediation prompt is the differentiator. Every other tool in this space stops at "here's a list of findings."
+
+## Who it's for
+
+- Teams running AI agents in the dev loop who are tired of unbounded agent rewrites and want a CI gate that actively constrains follow-up scope.
+- Repos that want a maintainability gate without paying for SonarQube / CodeClimate / Qlty or sending code to a third party.
+- Solo devs who want a single-binary deterministic audit they can pin in a Makefile, a pre-commit, or a local CI script.
+
+## Design principles
+
+- **Deterministic first, AI optional.** The audit never calls an LLM by default. The remediation prompt is a generated artifact that you choose to hand to an agent.
+- **Bounded scope.** The remediation prompt explicitly tells the agent to fix the listed findings only — not to embark on architecture cleanup.
+- **No vendor lock-in.** All outputs (Markdown, JSON, SARIF, PR comment) are plain files. Pair this tool with mature analyzers (ESLint, Ruff, Radon, Semgrep, SonarQube, Qlty/Code Climate) — don't replace them.
+- **Pass-the-cost-of-disclosure.** A finding that's "just a warning" never blocks CI alone. Hard gates are configurable + opt-in.
+
+See [docs/philosophy.md](docs/philosophy.md) for the longer version.
+
+## Self-Audit
+
+This repo eats its own dogfood — the tool is run against this codebase as part of CI, and the latest report is checked in at [docs/self-audit.md](docs/self-audit.md):
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|---|---:|
+| Overall score | **5.0 / 5 (A+)** |
+| File warnings | 0 |
+| Function warnings | 0 |
+| Duplicate blocks | 0 |
+| Risk findings | 0 |
+| Hard gate failures | 0 |
+
+All five ISO/IEC 25010 categories (modularity, reusability, analyzability, modifiability, testability) score 5.0. Regenerate with `maintainability-agent --config maintainability-agent.json --output docs/self-audit.md` (see the file's preamble for the path-sanitization step).
+
+## Install
+
+Run directly from source:
+
+```bash
+python3 -m maintainability_audit \
+  --root . \
+  --config maintainability-agent.json \
+  --output maintainability-report.md
+```
+
+Or install editable during development:
+
+```bash
+python3 -m pip install -e .
+maintainability-audit --root . --config maintainability-agent.json
+maintainability-agent --root . --config maintainability-agent.json
+```
+
+## Quick Start
+
+Copy the example config to your repo root as `maintainability-agent.json`:
+
+```bash
+cp maintainability-audit.example.json maintainability-agent.json
+```
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+maintainability-agent \
+  --config maintainability-agent.json \
+  --format markdown \
+  --output maintainability-report.md
+```
+
+Fail CI on hard gates:
+
+```bash
+maintainability-agent \
+  --config maintainability-agent.json \
+  --fail-on-gate \
+  --output maintainability-report.md \
+  --prompt-output maintainability-remediation-prompt.md \
+  --comment-output maintainability-pr-comment.md
+```
+
+## What It Analyzes
+
+The deterministic scanner reads code from your repo (no LLM calls) and produces signals on:
+
+- largest files (warn / fail thresholds configurable per-repo)
+- approximate function/class size
+- approximate cyclomatic complexity
+- duplicate blocks (≥ N consecutive non-trivial lines, configurable)
+- configurable risk patterns (regex matchers — TODO/FIXME, `eval(`, `exec(`, custom)
+- expected files present (README, LICENSE, etc. — opt-in hard gate)
+- expected test/lint commands declared in the config (opt-in hard gate)
+- worktree-clean state at audit time (opt-in hard gate)
+- ISO/IEC 25010-inspired 0–5 score per category + overall letter grade
+
+The analyzer is intentionally conservative and dependency-free. Mature repos should **pair** this with native tools (ESLint, Ruff, Radon, Semgrep, SonarQube, Qlty / Code Climate) — not replace them. SARIF input from those tools can be folded into this tool's report via `--sarif-input`.
+
+## What It Produces
+
+Each run can emit any combination of:
+
+- `maintainability-report.md` — the full Markdown report with summary, score, hotspots, duplicates, risk findings, external (SARIF) findings.
+- `maintainability-remediation-prompt.md` — bounded AI prompt scoped to the run's findings.
+- `maintainability-pr-comment.md` — short body suitable for a `gh pr comment` post.
+- `maintainability.sarif` — SARIF 2.1.0 output for GitHub Code Scanning ingestion.
+- `maintainability-baseline.json` — fingerprints of current findings, for `--fail-on-new` incremental adoption.
+- Per-tool agent instruction files (`AGENTS.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, `.cursor/rules/maintainability.mdc`, `.github/copilot-instructions.md`, `.windsurf/rules/maintainability.md`, `AI-MAINTAINABILITY.md`) via `--init-agent-standards`.
+
+## AI Remediation Prompt
+
+The runner can generate a bounded prompt for a human developer to give to Claude, Codex, or another coding assistant:
+
+```bash
+maintainability-agent \
+  --config maintainability-agent.json \
+  --output maintainability-report.md \
+  --prompt-output maintainability-remediation-prompt.md
+```
+
+The prompt is designed for AI-written or AI-assisted code reviews. It tells the assistant to:
+
+- fix only the highest-value maintainability issues
+- keep the patch small and reviewable
+- preserve existing architecture and behavior
+- add tests where behavior changes
+- report false positives instead of rewriting blindly
+
+This makes the CI artifact actionable without letting the audit turn into an unbounded refactor request.
+
+## PR and Baseline Workflows
+
+PR-only audits, baseline grandfathering, AI-agent instruction
+generation, and reusable agent-standard file generation are covered
+in [PR and Baseline Workflows](docs/pr-and-baseline-workflows.md).
+
+## Running Tests
+
+```bash
+# Sandbox-friendly invocation (works with PYTEST_DISABLE_PLUGIN_AUTOLOAD=1):
+PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m pytest
+
+# With coverage gate (matches CI):
+PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m pytest \
+  --cov=maintainability_audit --cov-fail-under=92
+
+# With ruff lint + pip-audit (matches CI):
+python3 -m pip install -e ".[dev]"
+ruff check src tests
+pip-audit
+PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m pytest --cov=maintainability_audit --cov-fail-under=92
+```
+
+Coverage is intentionally NOT in `[tool.pytest.ini_options].addopts` so the
+sandbox-friendly invocation (`PYTEST_DISABLE_PLUGIN_AUTOLOAD=1`) doesn't choke
+on `--cov` flags it can't load. Pass coverage flags explicitly when you want
+the gate.
+
+## Scoring Standard
+
+The audit model is based on ISO/IEC 25010 maintainability:
+
+- modularity
+- reusability
+- analyzability
+- modifiability
+- testability
+
+See [docs/standard.md](docs/standard.md).
+
+## Documentation
+
+- [CLI reference](docs/cli.md)
+- [Config schema](docs/config-schema.md)
+- [Philosophy](docs/philosophy.md)
+- [Analyzer adapters](docs/adapters.md)
+- [External quality tools](docs/external-quality-tools.md)
+- [IDE and agent integration](docs/ide-agent-integration.md)
+- [PR and baseline workflows](docs/pr-and-baseline-workflows.md)
+- [Roadmap](docs/roadmap.md)
+
+## GitHub Action
+
+This repo includes `action.yml`, so it can be used as a composite action after publishing:
+
+```yaml
+- uses: marshallguillory86/maintainability-agent@v0.1.0
+  with:
+    config: maintainability-agent.json
+    changed-only: main...HEAD
+```
+
+## GitHub Actions
+
+After publishing, copy `.github/workflows/maintainability.yml` into the target repo or adapt it for your local CI.
+
+## IDE and Agent Integration
+
+See [docs/ide-agent-integration.md](docs/ide-agent-integration.md) for VS Code tasks and integration notes for Copilot, Cursor, Codex, Claude Code, Windsurf, generic agents, local CI, and GitHub Actions.
+
+## Local CI
+
+For repos that do not use GitHub Actions, use:
+
+```bash
+examples/local-ci.sh
+```
+
+The local CI script enforces test coverage at `>=92%` and writes `coverage.xml` for SonarQube Cloud, Qlty, Codacy, or any other tool that can ingest Python coverage.
+
+## Get in Touch
+
+- **Bug reports / feature requests / general questions** — open a [GitHub Issue](https://github.com/marshallguillory86/maintainability-agent/issues/new).
+- **Discussion / ideas** — use the [Discussions tab](https://github.com/marshallguillory86/maintainability-agent/discussions) (enable in repo settings if not visible yet).
+- **Security vulnerabilities** — see [`SECURITY.md`](SECURITY.md) and use the [private security advisory flow](https://github.com/marshallguillory86/maintainability-agent/security/advisories/new). Do **not** post vulnerabilities in public issues.
+
+## License
+
+MIT

maintainability_agent-0.1.0/pyproject.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+[build-system]
+requires = ["setuptools>=68"]
+build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"
+
+[project]
+name = "maintainability-agent"
+version = "0.1.0"
+description = "Maintainability gate and AI remediation prompt generator for CI."
+readme = "README.md"
+requires-python = ">=3.10"
+license = { text = "MIT" }
+authors = [
+  { name = "Marshall Guillory" }
+]
+keywords = ["maintainability", "ci", "audit", "quality", "iso-25010", "ai-code-review"]
+classifiers = [
+  "Development Status :: 3 - Alpha",
+  "Environment :: Console",
+  "Intended Audience :: Developers",
+  "License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License",
+  "Programming Language :: Python :: 3",
+  "Programming Language :: Python :: 3 :: Only",
+  "Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance"
+]
+
+[project.scripts]
+maintainability-audit = "maintainability_audit.cli:main"
+maintainability-agent = "maintainability_audit.cli:main"
+
+[project.optional-dependencies]
+test = ["pytest>=8", "pytest-cov>=5", "jsonschema>=4"]
+dev = ["pytest>=8", "pytest-cov>=5", "jsonschema>=4", "ruff>=0.5", "pip-audit>=2.7"]
+
+[tool.setuptools.packages.find]
+where = ["src"]
+
+[tool.pytest.ini_options]
+testpaths = ["tests"]
+# addopts intentionally empty so the sandbox-friendly invocation
+# (`PYTEST_DISABLE_PLUGIN_AUTOLOAD=1 pytest -p no:cacheprovider`) does
+# not choke on `--cov` flags whose plugin couldn't load. Coverage is
+# opt-in: pass `--cov=maintainability_audit --cov-fail-under=92`
+# explicitly (see CONTRIBUTING.md, docs/external-quality-tools.md,
+# and the GH workflow).
+
+[tool.coverage.run]
+branch = true
+source = ["maintainability_audit"]
+
+[tool.coverage.report]
+fail_under = 92
+show_missing = true
+skip_covered = false
+exclude_also = [
+  "if __name__ == .__main__.:",
+  "raise SystemExit\\(main\\(\\)\\)"
+]
+
+[tool.coverage.xml]
+output = "coverage.xml"
+
+[tool.ruff]
+line-length = 140
+target-version = "py311"
+
+[tool.ruff.lint]
+select = ["E", "F", "I", "UP", "B", "SIM"]

maintainability_agent-0.1.0/setup.cfg

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+[egg_info]
+tag_build = 
+tag_date = 0
+