llm-rsa 0.0.1__tar.gz
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/LICENSE +201 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/MANIFEST.in +5 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/PKG-INFO +253 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/README.md +216 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/llm_rsa/__init__.py +1 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/llm_rsa/_modidx.py +19 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/llm_rsa/core.py +107 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/llm_rsa.egg-info/PKG-INFO +253 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/llm_rsa.egg-info/SOURCES.txt +16 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/llm_rsa.egg-info/dependency_links.txt +1 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/llm_rsa.egg-info/entry_points.txt +2 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/llm_rsa.egg-info/not-zip-safe +1 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/llm_rsa.egg-info/requires.txt +4 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/llm_rsa.egg-info/top_level.txt +1 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/pyproject.toml +11 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/settings.ini +46 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/setup.cfg +4 -0
- llm_rsa-0.0.1/setup.py +63 -0
llm_rsa-0.0.1/LICENSE
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Apache License
|
|
2
|
+
Version 2.0, January 2004
|
|
3
|
+
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
1. Definitions.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
"License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
|
|
10
|
+
and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
|
|
13
|
+
the copyright owner that is granting the License.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
"Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
|
|
16
|
+
other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
|
|
17
|
+
control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
|
|
18
|
+
"control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
|
|
19
|
+
direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
|
|
20
|
+
otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
|
|
21
|
+
outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
"You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
|
|
24
|
+
exercising permissions granted by this License.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
"Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
|
|
27
|
+
including but not limited to software source code, documentation
|
|
28
|
+
source, and configuration files.
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
"Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
|
|
31
|
+
transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
|
|
32
|
+
not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
|
|
33
|
+
and conversions to other media types.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
"Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
|
|
36
|
+
Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
|
|
37
|
+
copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
|
|
38
|
+
(an example is provided in the Appendix below).
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
"Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
|
|
41
|
+
form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
|
|
42
|
+
editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
|
|
43
|
+
represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
|
|
44
|
+
of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
|
|
45
|
+
separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
|
|
46
|
+
the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
"Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
|
|
49
|
+
the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
|
|
50
|
+
to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
|
|
51
|
+
submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
|
|
52
|
+
or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
|
|
53
|
+
the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
|
|
54
|
+
means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
|
|
55
|
+
to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
|
|
56
|
+
communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
|
|
57
|
+
and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
|
|
58
|
+
Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
|
|
59
|
+
excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
|
|
60
|
+
designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
"Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
|
|
63
|
+
on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
|
|
64
|
+
subsequently incorporated within the Work.
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
|
|
67
|
+
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
|
|
68
|
+
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
|
|
69
|
+
copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
|
|
70
|
+
publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
|
|
71
|
+
Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
|
|
74
|
+
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
|
|
75
|
+
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
|
|
76
|
+
(except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
|
|
77
|
+
use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
|
|
78
|
+
where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
|
|
79
|
+
by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
|
|
80
|
+
Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
|
|
81
|
+
with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
|
|
82
|
+
institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
|
|
83
|
+
cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
|
|
84
|
+
or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
|
|
85
|
+
or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
|
|
86
|
+
granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
|
|
87
|
+
as of the date such litigation is filed.
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
|
|
90
|
+
Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
|
|
91
|
+
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
|
|
92
|
+
meet the following conditions:
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
(a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
|
|
95
|
+
Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
(b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
|
|
98
|
+
stating that You changed the files; and
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
(c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
|
|
101
|
+
that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
|
|
102
|
+
attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
|
|
103
|
+
excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
|
|
104
|
+
the Derivative Works; and
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
(d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
|
|
107
|
+
distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
|
|
108
|
+
include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
|
|
109
|
+
within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
|
|
110
|
+
pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
|
|
111
|
+
of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
|
|
112
|
+
as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
|
|
113
|
+
documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
|
|
114
|
+
within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
|
|
115
|
+
wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
|
|
116
|
+
of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
|
|
117
|
+
do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
|
|
118
|
+
notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
|
|
119
|
+
or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
|
|
120
|
+
that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
|
|
121
|
+
as modifying the License.
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
|
|
124
|
+
may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
|
|
125
|
+
for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
|
|
126
|
+
for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
|
|
127
|
+
reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
|
|
128
|
+
the conditions stated in this License.
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
|
|
131
|
+
any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
|
|
132
|
+
by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
|
|
133
|
+
this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
|
|
134
|
+
Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
|
|
135
|
+
the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
|
|
136
|
+
with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
|
|
139
|
+
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
|
|
140
|
+
except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
|
|
141
|
+
origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
|
|
144
|
+
agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
|
|
145
|
+
Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
146
|
+
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
|
|
147
|
+
implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
|
|
148
|
+
of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
|
|
149
|
+
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
|
|
150
|
+
appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
|
|
151
|
+
risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
|
|
154
|
+
whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
|
|
155
|
+
unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
|
|
156
|
+
negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
|
|
157
|
+
liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
|
|
158
|
+
incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
|
|
159
|
+
result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
|
|
160
|
+
Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
|
|
161
|
+
work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
|
|
162
|
+
other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
|
|
163
|
+
has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
|
|
166
|
+
the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
|
|
167
|
+
and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
|
|
168
|
+
or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
|
|
169
|
+
License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
|
|
170
|
+
on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
|
|
171
|
+
of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
|
|
172
|
+
defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
|
|
173
|
+
incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
|
|
174
|
+
of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
176
|
+
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
178
|
+
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
|
|
181
|
+
boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
|
|
182
|
+
replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
|
|
183
|
+
the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
|
|
184
|
+
comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
|
|
185
|
+
file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
|
|
186
|
+
same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
|
|
187
|
+
identification within third-party archives.
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
Copyright 2022, fastai
|
|
190
|
+
|
|
191
|
+
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
192
|
+
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
193
|
+
You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
194
|
+
|
|
195
|
+
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
197
|
+
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
198
|
+
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
199
|
+
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
200
|
+
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
201
|
+
limitations under the License.
|
llm_rsa-0.0.1/PKG-INFO
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Metadata-Version: 2.4
|
|
2
|
+
Name: llm_rsa
|
|
3
|
+
Version: 0.0.1
|
|
4
|
+
Summary: Recursive self aggregation
|
|
5
|
+
Home-page: https://github.com/risheekkumarb/llm_rsa
|
|
6
|
+
Author: Risheek kumar B
|
|
7
|
+
Author-email: b.risheekkumar@gmail.com
|
|
8
|
+
License: Apache-2.0
|
|
9
|
+
Keywords: nbdev jupyter notebook python
|
|
10
|
+
Classifier: Development Status :: 4 - Beta
|
|
11
|
+
Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
|
|
12
|
+
Classifier: Natural Language :: English
|
|
13
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.9
|
|
14
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.10
|
|
15
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11
|
|
16
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
|
|
17
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.13
|
|
18
|
+
Requires-Python: >=3.9
|
|
19
|
+
Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
|
|
20
|
+
License-File: LICENSE
|
|
21
|
+
Requires-Dist: fastcore
|
|
22
|
+
Requires-Dist: litellm
|
|
23
|
+
Provides-Extra: dev
|
|
24
|
+
Dynamic: author
|
|
25
|
+
Dynamic: author-email
|
|
26
|
+
Dynamic: classifier
|
|
27
|
+
Dynamic: description
|
|
28
|
+
Dynamic: description-content-type
|
|
29
|
+
Dynamic: home-page
|
|
30
|
+
Dynamic: keywords
|
|
31
|
+
Dynamic: license
|
|
32
|
+
Dynamic: license-file
|
|
33
|
+
Dynamic: provides-extra
|
|
34
|
+
Dynamic: requires-dist
|
|
35
|
+
Dynamic: requires-python
|
|
36
|
+
Dynamic: summary
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
# RSA - Recursive Self-Aggregation
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
<!-- WARNING: THIS FILE WAS AUTOGENERATED! DO NOT EDIT! -->
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
RSA implements Recursive Self-Aggregation, a technique for improving LLM
|
|
44
|
+
responses by generating multiple candidate answers and iteratively
|
|
45
|
+
aggregating them. The algorithm samples k candidates from a pool of M
|
|
46
|
+
responses, asks the LLM to synthesize an improved answer, and repeats
|
|
47
|
+
this process across multiple loops to converge on higher-quality
|
|
48
|
+
outputs.
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
## Developer Guide
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
If you are new to using `nbdev` here are some useful pointers to get you
|
|
53
|
+
started.
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
### Install in Development mode
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
``` sh
|
|
58
|
+
# make sure package is installed in development mode
|
|
59
|
+
$ pip install -e .
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
# make changes under nbs/ directory
|
|
62
|
+
# ...
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
# compile to have changes apply to
|
|
65
|
+
$ nbdev_prepare
|
|
66
|
+
```
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
## Usage
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
### Installation
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
Install latest from the GitHub \[repository\]\[repo\]:
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
``` sh
|
|
75
|
+
$ pip install git+https://github.com//.git
|
|
76
|
+
```
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
or from \[conda\]\[conda\]
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
``` sh
|
|
81
|
+
$ conda install -c
|
|
82
|
+
```
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
or from \[pypi\]\[pypi\]
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
``` sh
|
|
87
|
+
$ pip install
|
|
88
|
+
```
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
\[repo\]: \[docs\]: https://.github.io// \[pypi\]:
|
|
91
|
+
https://pypi.org/project// \[conda\]: https://anaconda.org//
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
### Documentation
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
Documentation can be found hosted on this GitHub
|
|
96
|
+
\[repository\]\[repo\]’s \[pages\]\[docs\]. Additionally you can find
|
|
97
|
+
package manager specific guidelines on \[conda\]\[conda\] and
|
|
98
|
+
\[pypi\]\[pypi\] respectively.
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
\[repo\]: \[docs\]: https://.github.io// \[pypi\]:
|
|
101
|
+
https://pypi.org/project// \[conda\]: https://anaconda.org//
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
## How to use
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
### Basic Usage
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
Create an RSA instance with your task prompt and call it to run the
|
|
108
|
+
aggregation:
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
``` python
|
|
111
|
+
task_prompt = '''Three people check into a hotel room that costs $30. They each contribute $10.
|
|
112
|
+
Later, the manager realizes the room only costs $25 and gives $5 to the bellboy to return.
|
|
113
|
+
The bellboy keeps $2 and gives $1 back to each person.
|
|
114
|
+
So each person paid $9 (total $27), plus the bellboy has $2, which equals $29.
|
|
115
|
+
Where did the extra dollar go?'''
|
|
116
|
+
```
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
``` python
|
|
119
|
+
agg_prompt = """Below is a reasoning problem followed by several candidate solutions.
|
|
120
|
+
Your job is to:
|
|
121
|
+
1. Carefully analyze each candidate's reasoning step-by-step
|
|
122
|
+
2. Identify which candidates make logical errors or arithmetic mistakes
|
|
123
|
+
3. Note which approaches lead to correct reasoning
|
|
124
|
+
4. Synthesize the best reasoning into a single, clear, correct solution
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
Show your work step-by-step, then state your final answer clearly."""
|
|
127
|
+
```
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
``` python
|
|
130
|
+
from llm_rsa.core import RSA
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
# Create RSA instance with a reasoning task
|
|
133
|
+
rsa = RSA(
|
|
134
|
+
task_prompt=task_prompt,
|
|
135
|
+
agg_prompt=agg_prompt,
|
|
136
|
+
M=4,
|
|
137
|
+
k=2,
|
|
138
|
+
loops=3
|
|
139
|
+
)
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
# Run the aggregation
|
|
142
|
+
results = rsa.run()
|
|
143
|
+
print(f"Generated {len(rsa.history)} total candidates across {rsa.loops} loops")
|
|
144
|
+
print('llm response: \n', results[-1].response)
|
|
145
|
+
```
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
Generated 12 total candidates across 3 loops
|
|
148
|
+
llm response:
|
|
149
|
+
### Analysis of Candidate Reasoning
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
Both **Candidate 1** and **Candidate 2** provide identical logical conclusions and correctly identify the fallacy.
|
|
152
|
+
* They both recognize that $27 is the total amount the guests spent ($30 - $3 refund).
|
|
153
|
+
* They both correctly point out that the $2 held by the bellboy is a *subset* of that $27, not an additional amount to be added to it.
|
|
154
|
+
* They both demonstrate that the correct way to reach the original $30 is to add the $3 refund to the $27 spent, rather than adding the $2 tip to the $27 spent.
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
The candidates effectively "debunked" the riddle's misdirection, which relies on the psychological trick of adding two numbers that do not belong together in a balance sheet.
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
---
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
### Step-by-Step Reasoning and Solution
|
|
161
|
+
|
|
162
|
+
To solve the mystery of the "missing dollar," we must track the $30 carefully and distinguish between **Assets** (money held) and **Expenses** (money spent).
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
**1. Track the $30 Total**
|
|
165
|
+
At the end of the transaction, the $30 is distributed as follows:
|
|
166
|
+
* **$25** is in the hotel's register (the actual price of the room).
|
|
167
|
+
* **$2** is in the bellboy's pocket (the stolen tip).
|
|
168
|
+
* **$3** is in the guests' pockets ($1 each).
|
|
169
|
+
* **Total: $25 + $2 + $3 = $30.**
|
|
170
|
+
Nothing is missing.
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
**2. Analyze the Guest Perspective (The $27)**
|
|
173
|
+
The riddle says: "Each person paid $9, total $27." This is correct. Let's look at what happened to that $27:
|
|
174
|
+
* **$25** went to the hotel for the room.
|
|
175
|
+
* **$2** went to the bellboy as a tip.
|
|
176
|
+
* **Total: $25 + $2 = $27.**
|
|
177
|
+
The $2 is already *inside* the $27.
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
**3. Identify the Logical Fallacy**
|
|
180
|
+
The riddle's error is the statement: *"Each person paid $9 (total $27), plus the bellboy has $2, which equals $29."*
|
|
181
|
+
This is an accounting error. You cannot add the bellboy's $2 to the $27 because the bellboy's $2 is **part of** the $27.
|
|
182
|
+
|
|
183
|
+
To reconcile the total to $30, you must add the money the guests **kept** (the $3 refund) to the money they **spent** ($27):
|
|
184
|
+
* **$27 (Spent) + $3 (Refunded) = $30.**
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
186
|
+
**Conclusion:**
|
|
187
|
+
The "extra dollar" does not exist. The riddle creates an illusion by adding a component of an expense ($2) to the total expense ($27), rather than adding the remaining cash on hand ($3) to the total expense.
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
### Final Answer
|
|
190
|
+
The dollar is not missing. The mistake is in the calculation: it adds the bellboy's $2 to the $27 spent, even though the $2 is already included in the $27. The correct calculation is $27 (spent) + $3 (returned to guests) = $30.
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
``` python
|
|
193
|
+
from litellm import completion
|
|
194
|
+
|
|
195
|
+
# Single direct call (baseline)
|
|
196
|
+
response = completion(
|
|
197
|
+
model='openrouter/google/gemini-3-flash-preview',
|
|
198
|
+
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": task_prompt}],
|
|
199
|
+
temperature=1.0
|
|
200
|
+
)
|
|
201
|
+
baseline_answer = response.choices[0].message.content
|
|
202
|
+
print("=== BASELINE (single call) ===")
|
|
203
|
+
print(baseline_answer)
|
|
204
|
+
```
|
|
205
|
+
|
|
206
|
+
=== BASELINE (single call) ===
|
|
207
|
+
The extra dollar didn't go anywhere; the confusion comes from **adding** the bellboy's tip to the guests' expenses instead of **subtracting** it.
|
|
208
|
+
|
|
209
|
+
Here is the correct breakdown of the math:
|
|
210
|
+
|
|
211
|
+
### 1. The Total Spent
|
|
212
|
+
Each person paid $9, for a total of **$27**.
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
### 2. Where that $27 is currently located
|
|
215
|
+
Of that $27:
|
|
216
|
+
* **$25** is in the cash register (the actual price of the room).
|
|
217
|
+
* **$2** is in the bellboy’s pocket.
|
|
218
|
+
* **Total: $27.**
|
|
219
|
+
|
|
220
|
+
### 3. The Logical Fallacy
|
|
221
|
+
The riddle tricks you by saying: *"$27 (paid) + $2 (bellboy) = $29."*
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
This is an error in logic because the **$2 is already included in the $27**. You are essentially adding the bellboy's tip twice.
|
|
224
|
+
|
|
225
|
+
**The correct math should be:**
|
|
226
|
+
* **Total Spent ($27) + Total Refunded ($3) = $30**
|
|
227
|
+
* OR
|
|
228
|
+
* **Total Spent ($27) - Bellboy's Tip ($2) = Room Price ($25)**
|
|
229
|
+
|
|
230
|
+
### Configuration Options
|
|
231
|
+
|
|
232
|
+
| Parameter | Default | Description |
|
|
233
|
+
|----|----|----|
|
|
234
|
+
| `task_prompt` | (required) | The main task/question to solve |
|
|
235
|
+
| `model` | `'openrouter/google/gemini-3-flash-preview'` | LLM model to use (any litellm-compatible model) |
|
|
236
|
+
| `M` | 8 | Number of candidates generated per loop |
|
|
237
|
+
| `k` | 4 | Number of candidates sampled for each aggregation |
|
|
238
|
+
| `loops` | 3 | Number of aggregation iterations |
|
|
239
|
+
| `temperature` | 1.0 | LLM sampling temperature |
|
|
240
|
+
| `n_workers` | 4 | Parallel workers for LLM calls |
|
|
241
|
+
| `agg_prompt` | (auto) | Custom aggregation prompt (optional) |
|
|
242
|
+
|
|
243
|
+
### How RSA Works
|
|
244
|
+
|
|
245
|
+
1. **Loop 0**: Generate M independent responses to the task prompt
|
|
246
|
+
2. **Loop 1+**: For each of M new candidates, randomly sample k
|
|
247
|
+
previous candidates and ask the LLM to aggregate them into an
|
|
248
|
+
improved answer
|
|
249
|
+
3. **Repeat** for the specified number of loops
|
|
250
|
+
4. **Return** the final pool of aggregated candidates
|
|
251
|
+
|
|
252
|
+
The `history` attribute stores all candidates across all loops, allowing
|
|
253
|
+
you to trace the aggregation process.
|
llm_rsa-0.0.1/README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# RSA - Recursive Self-Aggregation
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
|
|
4
|
+
<!-- WARNING: THIS FILE WAS AUTOGENERATED! DO NOT EDIT! -->
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
RSA implements Recursive Self-Aggregation, a technique for improving LLM
|
|
7
|
+
responses by generating multiple candidate answers and iteratively
|
|
8
|
+
aggregating them. The algorithm samples k candidates from a pool of M
|
|
9
|
+
responses, asks the LLM to synthesize an improved answer, and repeats
|
|
10
|
+
this process across multiple loops to converge on higher-quality
|
|
11
|
+
outputs.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Developer Guide
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
If you are new to using `nbdev` here are some useful pointers to get you
|
|
16
|
+
started.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
### Install in Development mode
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
``` sh
|
|
21
|
+
# make sure package is installed in development mode
|
|
22
|
+
$ pip install -e .
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
# make changes under nbs/ directory
|
|
25
|
+
# ...
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
# compile to have changes apply to
|
|
28
|
+
$ nbdev_prepare
|
|
29
|
+
```
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
## Usage
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
### Installation
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
Install latest from the GitHub \[repository\]\[repo\]:
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
``` sh
|
|
38
|
+
$ pip install git+https://github.com//.git
|
|
39
|
+
```
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
or from \[conda\]\[conda\]
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
``` sh
|
|
44
|
+
$ conda install -c
|
|
45
|
+
```
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
or from \[pypi\]\[pypi\]
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
``` sh
|
|
50
|
+
$ pip install
|
|
51
|
+
```
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
\[repo\]: \[docs\]: https://.github.io// \[pypi\]:
|
|
54
|
+
https://pypi.org/project// \[conda\]: https://anaconda.org//
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
### Documentation
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
Documentation can be found hosted on this GitHub
|
|
59
|
+
\[repository\]\[repo\]’s \[pages\]\[docs\]. Additionally you can find
|
|
60
|
+
package manager specific guidelines on \[conda\]\[conda\] and
|
|
61
|
+
\[pypi\]\[pypi\] respectively.
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
\[repo\]: \[docs\]: https://.github.io// \[pypi\]:
|
|
64
|
+
https://pypi.org/project// \[conda\]: https://anaconda.org//
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
## How to use
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
### Basic Usage
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
Create an RSA instance with your task prompt and call it to run the
|
|
71
|
+
aggregation:
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
``` python
|
|
74
|
+
task_prompt = '''Three people check into a hotel room that costs $30. They each contribute $10.
|
|
75
|
+
Later, the manager realizes the room only costs $25 and gives $5 to the bellboy to return.
|
|
76
|
+
The bellboy keeps $2 and gives $1 back to each person.
|
|
77
|
+
So each person paid $9 (total $27), plus the bellboy has $2, which equals $29.
|
|
78
|
+
Where did the extra dollar go?'''
|
|
79
|
+
```
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
``` python
|
|
82
|
+
agg_prompt = """Below is a reasoning problem followed by several candidate solutions.
|
|
83
|
+
Your job is to:
|
|
84
|
+
1. Carefully analyze each candidate's reasoning step-by-step
|
|
85
|
+
2. Identify which candidates make logical errors or arithmetic mistakes
|
|
86
|
+
3. Note which approaches lead to correct reasoning
|
|
87
|
+
4. Synthesize the best reasoning into a single, clear, correct solution
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
Show your work step-by-step, then state your final answer clearly."""
|
|
90
|
+
```
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
``` python
|
|
93
|
+
from llm_rsa.core import RSA
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
# Create RSA instance with a reasoning task
|
|
96
|
+
rsa = RSA(
|
|
97
|
+
task_prompt=task_prompt,
|
|
98
|
+
agg_prompt=agg_prompt,
|
|
99
|
+
M=4,
|
|
100
|
+
k=2,
|
|
101
|
+
loops=3
|
|
102
|
+
)
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
# Run the aggregation
|
|
105
|
+
results = rsa.run()
|
|
106
|
+
print(f"Generated {len(rsa.history)} total candidates across {rsa.loops} loops")
|
|
107
|
+
print('llm response: \n', results[-1].response)
|
|
108
|
+
```
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
Generated 12 total candidates across 3 loops
|
|
111
|
+
llm response:
|
|
112
|
+
### Analysis of Candidate Reasoning
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
Both **Candidate 1** and **Candidate 2** provide identical logical conclusions and correctly identify the fallacy.
|
|
115
|
+
* They both recognize that $27 is the total amount the guests spent ($30 - $3 refund).
|
|
116
|
+
* They both correctly point out that the $2 held by the bellboy is a *subset* of that $27, not an additional amount to be added to it.
|
|
117
|
+
* They both demonstrate that the correct way to reach the original $30 is to add the $3 refund to the $27 spent, rather than adding the $2 tip to the $27 spent.
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
The candidates effectively "debunked" the riddle's misdirection, which relies on the psychological trick of adding two numbers that do not belong together in a balance sheet.
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
---
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
### Step-by-Step Reasoning and Solution
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
To solve the mystery of the "missing dollar," we must track the $30 carefully and distinguish between **Assets** (money held) and **Expenses** (money spent).
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
**1. Track the $30 Total**
|
|
128
|
+
At the end of the transaction, the $30 is distributed as follows:
|
|
129
|
+
* **$25** is in the hotel's register (the actual price of the room).
|
|
130
|
+
* **$2** is in the bellboy's pocket (the stolen tip).
|
|
131
|
+
* **$3** is in the guests' pockets ($1 each).
|
|
132
|
+
* **Total: $25 + $2 + $3 = $30.**
|
|
133
|
+
Nothing is missing.
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
**2. Analyze the Guest Perspective (The $27)**
|
|
136
|
+
The riddle says: "Each person paid $9, total $27." This is correct. Let's look at what happened to that $27:
|
|
137
|
+
* **$25** went to the hotel for the room.
|
|
138
|
+
* **$2** went to the bellboy as a tip.
|
|
139
|
+
* **Total: $25 + $2 = $27.**
|
|
140
|
+
The $2 is already *inside* the $27.
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
**3. Identify the Logical Fallacy**
|
|
143
|
+
The riddle's error is the statement: *"Each person paid $9 (total $27), plus the bellboy has $2, which equals $29."*
|
|
144
|
+
This is an accounting error. You cannot add the bellboy's $2 to the $27 because the bellboy's $2 is **part of** the $27.
|
|
145
|
+
|
|
146
|
+
To reconcile the total to $30, you must add the money the guests **kept** (the $3 refund) to the money they **spent** ($27):
|
|
147
|
+
* **$27 (Spent) + $3 (Refunded) = $30.**
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
**Conclusion:**
|
|
150
|
+
The "extra dollar" does not exist. The riddle creates an illusion by adding a component of an expense ($2) to the total expense ($27), rather than adding the remaining cash on hand ($3) to the total expense.
|
|
151
|
+
|
|
152
|
+
### Final Answer
|
|
153
|
+
The dollar is not missing. The mistake is in the calculation: it adds the bellboy's $2 to the $27 spent, even though the $2 is already included in the $27. The correct calculation is $27 (spent) + $3 (returned to guests) = $30.
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
``` python
|
|
156
|
+
from litellm import completion
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
# Single direct call (baseline)
|
|
159
|
+
response = completion(
|
|
160
|
+
model='openrouter/google/gemini-3-flash-preview',
|
|
161
|
+
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": task_prompt}],
|
|
162
|
+
temperature=1.0
|
|
163
|
+
)
|
|
164
|
+
baseline_answer = response.choices[0].message.content
|
|
165
|
+
print("=== BASELINE (single call) ===")
|
|
166
|
+
print(baseline_answer)
|
|
167
|
+
```
|
|
168
|
+
|
|
169
|
+
=== BASELINE (single call) ===
|
|
170
|
+
The extra dollar didn't go anywhere; the confusion comes from **adding** the bellboy's tip to the guests' expenses instead of **subtracting** it.
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
Here is the correct breakdown of the math:
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
### 1. The Total Spent
|
|
175
|
+
Each person paid $9, for a total of **$27**.
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
### 2. Where that $27 is currently located
|
|
178
|
+
Of that $27:
|
|
179
|
+
* **$25** is in the cash register (the actual price of the room).
|
|
180
|
+
* **$2** is in the bellboy’s pocket.
|
|
181
|
+
* **Total: $27.**
|
|
182
|
+
|
|
183
|
+
### 3. The Logical Fallacy
|
|
184
|
+
The riddle tricks you by saying: *"$27 (paid) + $2 (bellboy) = $29."*
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
186
|
+
This is an error in logic because the **$2 is already included in the $27**. You are essentially adding the bellboy's tip twice.
|
|
187
|
+
|
|
188
|
+
**The correct math should be:**
|
|
189
|
+
* **Total Spent ($27) + Total Refunded ($3) = $30**
|
|
190
|
+
* OR
|
|
191
|
+
* **Total Spent ($27) - Bellboy's Tip ($2) = Room Price ($25)**
|
|
192
|
+
|
|
193
|
+
### Configuration Options
|
|
194
|
+
|
|
195
|
+
| Parameter | Default | Description |
|
|
196
|
+
|----|----|----|
|
|
197
|
+
| `task_prompt` | (required) | The main task/question to solve |
|
|
198
|
+
| `model` | `'openrouter/google/gemini-3-flash-preview'` | LLM model to use (any litellm-compatible model) |
|
|
199
|
+
| `M` | 8 | Number of candidates generated per loop |
|
|
200
|
+
| `k` | 4 | Number of candidates sampled for each aggregation |
|
|
201
|
+
| `loops` | 3 | Number of aggregation iterations |
|
|
202
|
+
| `temperature` | 1.0 | LLM sampling temperature |
|
|
203
|
+
| `n_workers` | 4 | Parallel workers for LLM calls |
|
|
204
|
+
| `agg_prompt` | (auto) | Custom aggregation prompt (optional) |
|
|
205
|
+
|
|
206
|
+
### How RSA Works
|
|
207
|
+
|
|
208
|
+
1. **Loop 0**: Generate M independent responses to the task prompt
|
|
209
|
+
2. **Loop 1+**: For each of M new candidates, randomly sample k
|
|
210
|
+
previous candidates and ask the LLM to aggregate them into an
|
|
211
|
+
improved answer
|
|
212
|
+
3. **Repeat** for the specified number of loops
|
|
213
|
+
4. **Return** the final pool of aggregated candidates
|
|
214
|
+
|
|
215
|
+
The `history` attribute stores all candidates across all loops, allowing
|
|
216
|
+
you to trace the aggregation process.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
__version__ = "0.0.1"
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Autogenerated by nbdev
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
d = { 'settings': { 'branch': 'main',
|
|
4
|
+
'doc_baseurl': '/llm_rsa',
|
|
5
|
+
'doc_host': 'https://risheekkumarb.github.io',
|
|
6
|
+
'git_url': 'https://github.com/risheekkumarb/llm_rsa',
|
|
7
|
+
'lib_path': 'llm_rsa'},
|
|
8
|
+
'syms': { 'llm_rsa.core': { 'llm_rsa.core.RSA': ('core.html#rsa', 'llm_rsa/core.py'),
|
|
9
|
+
'llm_rsa.core.RSA.__init__': ('core.html#rsa.__init__', 'llm_rsa/core.py'),
|
|
10
|
+
'llm_rsa.core.RSA.__repr__': ('core.html#rsa.__repr__', 'llm_rsa/core.py'),
|
|
11
|
+
'llm_rsa.core.RSA._agg_prompt': ('core.html#rsa._agg_prompt', 'llm_rsa/core.py'),
|
|
12
|
+
'llm_rsa.core.RSA._call_llm': ('core.html#rsa._call_llm', 'llm_rsa/core.py'),
|
|
13
|
+
'llm_rsa.core.RSA._run_loop': ('core.html#rsa._run_loop', 'llm_rsa/core.py'),
|
|
14
|
+
'llm_rsa.core.RSA.aggregate': ('core.html#rsa.aggregate', 'llm_rsa/core.py'),
|
|
15
|
+
'llm_rsa.core.RSA.get_prompts': ('core.html#rsa.get_prompts', 'llm_rsa/core.py'),
|
|
16
|
+
'llm_rsa.core.RSA.run': ('core.html#rsa.run', 'llm_rsa/core.py'),
|
|
17
|
+
'llm_rsa.core.RSACandidate': ('core.html#rsacandidate', 'llm_rsa/core.py'),
|
|
18
|
+
'llm_rsa.core.RSACandidate.__init__': ('core.html#rsacandidate.__init__', 'llm_rsa/core.py'),
|
|
19
|
+
'llm_rsa.core.RSACandidate.__repr__': ('core.html#rsacandidate.__repr__', 'llm_rsa/core.py')}}}
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
"""Recursive Self-Aggregation (RSA) - A general-purpose LLM aggregation algorithm using litellm based on the paper **https://rsa-llm.github.io/**"""
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
# AUTOGENERATED! DO NOT EDIT! File to edit: ../nbs/00_core.ipynb.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# %% auto #0
|
|
6
|
+
__all__ = ['RSACandidate', 'RSA']
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
# %% ../nbs/00_core.ipynb #ccd7cb56
|
|
9
|
+
from fastcore.all import *
|
|
10
|
+
from fastcore.test import *
|
|
11
|
+
from litellm import completion
|
|
12
|
+
import random, uuid
|
|
13
|
+
from itertools import combinations
|
|
14
|
+
from fastprogress import progress_bar
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
# %% ../nbs/00_core.ipynb #c8def011
|
|
17
|
+
class RSACandidate:
|
|
18
|
+
"A candidate response in the RSA algorithm"
|
|
19
|
+
def __init__(self, id:str, loop_id:int, prompt:str, response:str=None, parent_ids:list=None): store_attr()
|
|
20
|
+
def __repr__(self): return f'id:{self.id}\nloop_id:{self.loop_id}\nprompt:\n{self.prompt}\nresponse:\n{self.response}\nparent_ids:\n{self.parent_ids}'
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
# %% ../nbs/00_core.ipynb #cc5af69e
|
|
23
|
+
class RSA:
|
|
24
|
+
"Recursive Self-Aggregation algorithm for LLM response aggregation"
|
|
25
|
+
def __init__(
|
|
26
|
+
self,
|
|
27
|
+
task_prompt:str, # The main task/question to solve
|
|
28
|
+
agg_prompt:str=None, # Custom aggregation prompt
|
|
29
|
+
model:str='openrouter/google/gemini-3-flash-preview', # LLM model to use
|
|
30
|
+
N:int=4, # Population size (candidates per loop)
|
|
31
|
+
K:int=3, # Number of candidates to aggregate
|
|
32
|
+
loops:int=2, # Number of aggregation loops
|
|
33
|
+
history:list=None, # History of all candidates
|
|
34
|
+
temperature:float=1.0, # LLM temperature
|
|
35
|
+
n_workers:int=4 # Parallel workers
|
|
36
|
+
):
|
|
37
|
+
if not task_prompt: raise ValueError("task_prompt is required")
|
|
38
|
+
store_attr()
|
|
39
|
+
if not history: self.history = L()
|
|
40
|
+
if not self.agg_prompt: self.agg_prompt = """You are given question with training examples and a test input.\nYou are also provided several candidate solutions. Some candidates may be incorrect\nAggregate/consider all the candidates and use their help to produce the improved correct solution"""
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
def __repr__(self): return f'RSA(model={self.model!r}, \nN={self.N}, \nK={self.K}, \nloops={self.loops}, \nhistory={len(self.history)} candidates, \ntask_prompt={self.task_prompt})'
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
# %% ../nbs/00_core.ipynb #3c39e9e6
|
|
45
|
+
@patch
|
|
46
|
+
def _call_llm(self:RSA, prompt):
|
|
47
|
+
"Call the LLM with the given prompt and return the response content"
|
|
48
|
+
response = completion(
|
|
49
|
+
model=self.model,
|
|
50
|
+
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
|
|
51
|
+
temperature=self.temperature,
|
|
52
|
+
)
|
|
53
|
+
return response.choices[0].message.content
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
# %% ../nbs/00_core.ipynb #ef493c51
|
|
56
|
+
@patch
|
|
57
|
+
def _agg_prompt(self:RSA, candidates: list[RSACandidate]) -> str:
|
|
58
|
+
"Build an aggregation prompt combining the task prompt with candidate responses"
|
|
59
|
+
parts = [
|
|
60
|
+
self.agg_prompt,
|
|
61
|
+
self.task_prompt,
|
|
62
|
+
"\nCANDIDATE ANSWERS (may contain mistakes):",
|
|
63
|
+
]
|
|
64
|
+
for i, cand in enumerate(candidates, 1):
|
|
65
|
+
parts.append(f"---- Candidate {i} ----\n{cand.response}")
|
|
66
|
+
parts.append("\nYour response:")
|
|
67
|
+
return "\n".join(parts)
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
# %% ../nbs/00_core.ipynb #81deb527
|
|
70
|
+
@patch
|
|
71
|
+
def get_prompts(self:RSA, loop_id, cands=None):
|
|
72
|
+
"Generate candidate prompts for a given loop: N initial candidates, or all C(n,K) combinations for aggregation"
|
|
73
|
+
if not cands: return L(RSACandidate(id=str(uuid.uuid4()), loop_id=loop_id, prompt=self.task_prompt) for _ in range(self.N))
|
|
74
|
+
if len(cands) < self.K: raise ValueError(f"Need at least {self.K} candidates, got {len(cands)}")
|
|
75
|
+
sel_cands = L(combinations(cands, self.K))
|
|
76
|
+
if len(sel_cands) < self.N: raise ValueError(f"C({len(cands)},{self.K})={len(sel_cands)} combinations is less than N={self.N}")
|
|
77
|
+
sel_cands = sel_cands.shuffle()[:self.N]
|
|
78
|
+
return sel_cands.map(lambda x: RSACandidate(id=str(uuid.uuid4()), loop_id=loop_id, prompt=self._agg_prompt(x), parent_ids=L(x).attrgot('id')))
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
# %% ../nbs/00_core.ipynb #80329d80
|
|
81
|
+
@patch
|
|
82
|
+
def _run_loop(self:RSA, loop_id, pool=None):
|
|
83
|
+
"Execute one loop: generate prompts, call LLM in parallel, attach responses"
|
|
84
|
+
prompts = self.get_prompts(loop_id, pool)
|
|
85
|
+
responses = parallel(self._call_llm, prompts.attrgot('prompt'), n_workers=self.n_workers, progress=True)
|
|
86
|
+
for p, r in zip(prompts, responses): p.response = r
|
|
87
|
+
return prompts
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
# %% ../nbs/00_core.ipynb #02599e94
|
|
90
|
+
@patch
|
|
91
|
+
def run(self:RSA):
|
|
92
|
+
"Run the full RSA algorithm for the configured number of loops and return the final candidate pool"
|
|
93
|
+
pbar = progress_bar(range(self.loops))
|
|
94
|
+
for i in pbar:
|
|
95
|
+
pbar.comment = f"Loop {i+1}"
|
|
96
|
+
pool = self._run_loop(i, pool if i > 0 else None)
|
|
97
|
+
self.history.extend(pool)
|
|
98
|
+
return pool
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
# %% ../nbs/00_core.ipynb #b4edf71c
|
|
101
|
+
@patch
|
|
102
|
+
def aggregate(self:RSA):
|
|
103
|
+
"Final aggregation one LLM call to aggregate all the final loop candidates"
|
|
104
|
+
candidates = self.history.filter(lambda x: x.loop_id==(self.loops-1))
|
|
105
|
+
responses = '\n'.join(f"---- Candidate {i+1} ----\n{c.response}" for i, c in enumerate(candidates))
|
|
106
|
+
prompt = f"{self.agg_prompt}\n{self.task_prompt}\n\nCANDIDATE ANSWERS:\n{responses}\n\nProvide the best aggregated answer:"
|
|
107
|
+
return prompt, self._call_llm(prompt)
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Metadata-Version: 2.4
|
|
2
|
+
Name: llm_rsa
|
|
3
|
+
Version: 0.0.1
|
|
4
|
+
Summary: Recursive self aggregation
|
|
5
|
+
Home-page: https://github.com/risheekkumarb/llm_rsa
|
|
6
|
+
Author: Risheek kumar B
|
|
7
|
+
Author-email: b.risheekkumar@gmail.com
|
|
8
|
+
License: Apache-2.0
|
|
9
|
+
Keywords: nbdev jupyter notebook python
|
|
10
|
+
Classifier: Development Status :: 4 - Beta
|
|
11
|
+
Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
|
|
12
|
+
Classifier: Natural Language :: English
|
|
13
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.9
|
|
14
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.10
|
|
15
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11
|
|
16
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
|
|
17
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.13
|
|
18
|
+
Requires-Python: >=3.9
|
|
19
|
+
Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
|
|
20
|
+
License-File: LICENSE
|
|
21
|
+
Requires-Dist: fastcore
|
|
22
|
+
Requires-Dist: litellm
|
|
23
|
+
Provides-Extra: dev
|
|
24
|
+
Dynamic: author
|
|
25
|
+
Dynamic: author-email
|
|
26
|
+
Dynamic: classifier
|
|
27
|
+
Dynamic: description
|
|
28
|
+
Dynamic: description-content-type
|
|
29
|
+
Dynamic: home-page
|
|
30
|
+
Dynamic: keywords
|
|
31
|
+
Dynamic: license
|
|
32
|
+
Dynamic: license-file
|
|
33
|
+
Dynamic: provides-extra
|
|
34
|
+
Dynamic: requires-dist
|
|
35
|
+
Dynamic: requires-python
|
|
36
|
+
Dynamic: summary
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
# RSA - Recursive Self-Aggregation
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
<!-- WARNING: THIS FILE WAS AUTOGENERATED! DO NOT EDIT! -->
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
RSA implements Recursive Self-Aggregation, a technique for improving LLM
|
|
44
|
+
responses by generating multiple candidate answers and iteratively
|
|
45
|
+
aggregating them. The algorithm samples k candidates from a pool of M
|
|
46
|
+
responses, asks the LLM to synthesize an improved answer, and repeats
|
|
47
|
+
this process across multiple loops to converge on higher-quality
|
|
48
|
+
outputs.
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
## Developer Guide
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
If you are new to using `nbdev` here are some useful pointers to get you
|
|
53
|
+
started.
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
### Install in Development mode
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
``` sh
|
|
58
|
+
# make sure package is installed in development mode
|
|
59
|
+
$ pip install -e .
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
# make changes under nbs/ directory
|
|
62
|
+
# ...
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
# compile to have changes apply to
|
|
65
|
+
$ nbdev_prepare
|
|
66
|
+
```
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
## Usage
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
### Installation
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
Install latest from the GitHub \[repository\]\[repo\]:
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
``` sh
|
|
75
|
+
$ pip install git+https://github.com//.git
|
|
76
|
+
```
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
or from \[conda\]\[conda\]
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
``` sh
|
|
81
|
+
$ conda install -c
|
|
82
|
+
```
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
or from \[pypi\]\[pypi\]
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
``` sh
|
|
87
|
+
$ pip install
|
|
88
|
+
```
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
\[repo\]: \[docs\]: https://.github.io// \[pypi\]:
|
|
91
|
+
https://pypi.org/project// \[conda\]: https://anaconda.org//
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
### Documentation
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
Documentation can be found hosted on this GitHub
|
|
96
|
+
\[repository\]\[repo\]’s \[pages\]\[docs\]. Additionally you can find
|
|
97
|
+
package manager specific guidelines on \[conda\]\[conda\] and
|
|
98
|
+
\[pypi\]\[pypi\] respectively.
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
\[repo\]: \[docs\]: https://.github.io// \[pypi\]:
|
|
101
|
+
https://pypi.org/project// \[conda\]: https://anaconda.org//
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
## How to use
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
### Basic Usage
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
Create an RSA instance with your task prompt and call it to run the
|
|
108
|
+
aggregation:
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
``` python
|
|
111
|
+
task_prompt = '''Three people check into a hotel room that costs $30. They each contribute $10.
|
|
112
|
+
Later, the manager realizes the room only costs $25 and gives $5 to the bellboy to return.
|
|
113
|
+
The bellboy keeps $2 and gives $1 back to each person.
|
|
114
|
+
So each person paid $9 (total $27), plus the bellboy has $2, which equals $29.
|
|
115
|
+
Where did the extra dollar go?'''
|
|
116
|
+
```
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
``` python
|
|
119
|
+
agg_prompt = """Below is a reasoning problem followed by several candidate solutions.
|
|
120
|
+
Your job is to:
|
|
121
|
+
1. Carefully analyze each candidate's reasoning step-by-step
|
|
122
|
+
2. Identify which candidates make logical errors or arithmetic mistakes
|
|
123
|
+
3. Note which approaches lead to correct reasoning
|
|
124
|
+
4. Synthesize the best reasoning into a single, clear, correct solution
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
Show your work step-by-step, then state your final answer clearly."""
|
|
127
|
+
```
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
``` python
|
|
130
|
+
from llm_rsa.core import RSA
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
# Create RSA instance with a reasoning task
|
|
133
|
+
rsa = RSA(
|
|
134
|
+
task_prompt=task_prompt,
|
|
135
|
+
agg_prompt=agg_prompt,
|
|
136
|
+
M=4,
|
|
137
|
+
k=2,
|
|
138
|
+
loops=3
|
|
139
|
+
)
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
# Run the aggregation
|
|
142
|
+
results = rsa.run()
|
|
143
|
+
print(f"Generated {len(rsa.history)} total candidates across {rsa.loops} loops")
|
|
144
|
+
print('llm response: \n', results[-1].response)
|
|
145
|
+
```
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
Generated 12 total candidates across 3 loops
|
|
148
|
+
llm response:
|
|
149
|
+
### Analysis of Candidate Reasoning
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
Both **Candidate 1** and **Candidate 2** provide identical logical conclusions and correctly identify the fallacy.
|
|
152
|
+
* They both recognize that $27 is the total amount the guests spent ($30 - $3 refund).
|
|
153
|
+
* They both correctly point out that the $2 held by the bellboy is a *subset* of that $27, not an additional amount to be added to it.
|
|
154
|
+
* They both demonstrate that the correct way to reach the original $30 is to add the $3 refund to the $27 spent, rather than adding the $2 tip to the $27 spent.
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
The candidates effectively "debunked" the riddle's misdirection, which relies on the psychological trick of adding two numbers that do not belong together in a balance sheet.
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
---
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
### Step-by-Step Reasoning and Solution
|
|
161
|
+
|
|
162
|
+
To solve the mystery of the "missing dollar," we must track the $30 carefully and distinguish between **Assets** (money held) and **Expenses** (money spent).
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
**1. Track the $30 Total**
|
|
165
|
+
At the end of the transaction, the $30 is distributed as follows:
|
|
166
|
+
* **$25** is in the hotel's register (the actual price of the room).
|
|
167
|
+
* **$2** is in the bellboy's pocket (the stolen tip).
|
|
168
|
+
* **$3** is in the guests' pockets ($1 each).
|
|
169
|
+
* **Total: $25 + $2 + $3 = $30.**
|
|
170
|
+
Nothing is missing.
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
**2. Analyze the Guest Perspective (The $27)**
|
|
173
|
+
The riddle says: "Each person paid $9, total $27." This is correct. Let's look at what happened to that $27:
|
|
174
|
+
* **$25** went to the hotel for the room.
|
|
175
|
+
* **$2** went to the bellboy as a tip.
|
|
176
|
+
* **Total: $25 + $2 = $27.**
|
|
177
|
+
The $2 is already *inside* the $27.
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
**3. Identify the Logical Fallacy**
|
|
180
|
+
The riddle's error is the statement: *"Each person paid $9 (total $27), plus the bellboy has $2, which equals $29."*
|
|
181
|
+
This is an accounting error. You cannot add the bellboy's $2 to the $27 because the bellboy's $2 is **part of** the $27.
|
|
182
|
+
|
|
183
|
+
To reconcile the total to $30, you must add the money the guests **kept** (the $3 refund) to the money they **spent** ($27):
|
|
184
|
+
* **$27 (Spent) + $3 (Refunded) = $30.**
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
186
|
+
**Conclusion:**
|
|
187
|
+
The "extra dollar" does not exist. The riddle creates an illusion by adding a component of an expense ($2) to the total expense ($27), rather than adding the remaining cash on hand ($3) to the total expense.
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
### Final Answer
|
|
190
|
+
The dollar is not missing. The mistake is in the calculation: it adds the bellboy's $2 to the $27 spent, even though the $2 is already included in the $27. The correct calculation is $27 (spent) + $3 (returned to guests) = $30.
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
``` python
|
|
193
|
+
from litellm import completion
|
|
194
|
+
|
|
195
|
+
# Single direct call (baseline)
|
|
196
|
+
response = completion(
|
|
197
|
+
model='openrouter/google/gemini-3-flash-preview',
|
|
198
|
+
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": task_prompt}],
|
|
199
|
+
temperature=1.0
|
|
200
|
+
)
|
|
201
|
+
baseline_answer = response.choices[0].message.content
|
|
202
|
+
print("=== BASELINE (single call) ===")
|
|
203
|
+
print(baseline_answer)
|
|
204
|
+
```
|
|
205
|
+
|
|
206
|
+
=== BASELINE (single call) ===
|
|
207
|
+
The extra dollar didn't go anywhere; the confusion comes from **adding** the bellboy's tip to the guests' expenses instead of **subtracting** it.
|
|
208
|
+
|
|
209
|
+
Here is the correct breakdown of the math:
|
|
210
|
+
|
|
211
|
+
### 1. The Total Spent
|
|
212
|
+
Each person paid $9, for a total of **$27**.
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
### 2. Where that $27 is currently located
|
|
215
|
+
Of that $27:
|
|
216
|
+
* **$25** is in the cash register (the actual price of the room).
|
|
217
|
+
* **$2** is in the bellboy’s pocket.
|
|
218
|
+
* **Total: $27.**
|
|
219
|
+
|
|
220
|
+
### 3. The Logical Fallacy
|
|
221
|
+
The riddle tricks you by saying: *"$27 (paid) + $2 (bellboy) = $29."*
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
This is an error in logic because the **$2 is already included in the $27**. You are essentially adding the bellboy's tip twice.
|
|
224
|
+
|
|
225
|
+
**The correct math should be:**
|
|
226
|
+
* **Total Spent ($27) + Total Refunded ($3) = $30**
|
|
227
|
+
* OR
|
|
228
|
+
* **Total Spent ($27) - Bellboy's Tip ($2) = Room Price ($25)**
|
|
229
|
+
|
|
230
|
+
### Configuration Options
|
|
231
|
+
|
|
232
|
+
| Parameter | Default | Description |
|
|
233
|
+
|----|----|----|
|
|
234
|
+
| `task_prompt` | (required) | The main task/question to solve |
|
|
235
|
+
| `model` | `'openrouter/google/gemini-3-flash-preview'` | LLM model to use (any litellm-compatible model) |
|
|
236
|
+
| `M` | 8 | Number of candidates generated per loop |
|
|
237
|
+
| `k` | 4 | Number of candidates sampled for each aggregation |
|
|
238
|
+
| `loops` | 3 | Number of aggregation iterations |
|
|
239
|
+
| `temperature` | 1.0 | LLM sampling temperature |
|
|
240
|
+
| `n_workers` | 4 | Parallel workers for LLM calls |
|
|
241
|
+
| `agg_prompt` | (auto) | Custom aggregation prompt (optional) |
|
|
242
|
+
|
|
243
|
+
### How RSA Works
|
|
244
|
+
|
|
245
|
+
1. **Loop 0**: Generate M independent responses to the task prompt
|
|
246
|
+
2. **Loop 1+**: For each of M new candidates, randomly sample k
|
|
247
|
+
previous candidates and ask the LLM to aggregate them into an
|
|
248
|
+
improved answer
|
|
249
|
+
3. **Repeat** for the specified number of loops
|
|
250
|
+
4. **Return** the final pool of aggregated candidates
|
|
251
|
+
|
|
252
|
+
The `history` attribute stores all candidates across all loops, allowing
|
|
253
|
+
you to trace the aggregation process.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
LICENSE
|
|
2
|
+
MANIFEST.in
|
|
3
|
+
README.md
|
|
4
|
+
pyproject.toml
|
|
5
|
+
settings.ini
|
|
6
|
+
setup.py
|
|
7
|
+
llm_rsa/__init__.py
|
|
8
|
+
llm_rsa/_modidx.py
|
|
9
|
+
llm_rsa/core.py
|
|
10
|
+
llm_rsa.egg-info/PKG-INFO
|
|
11
|
+
llm_rsa.egg-info/SOURCES.txt
|
|
12
|
+
llm_rsa.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
|
|
13
|
+
llm_rsa.egg-info/entry_points.txt
|
|
14
|
+
llm_rsa.egg-info/not-zip-safe
|
|
15
|
+
llm_rsa.egg-info/requires.txt
|
|
16
|
+
llm_rsa.egg-info/top_level.txt
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
llm_rsa
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
[build-system]
|
|
2
|
+
requires = ["setuptools>=64.0"]
|
|
3
|
+
build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
[project]
|
|
6
|
+
name="llm_rsa"
|
|
7
|
+
requires-python=">=3.9"
|
|
8
|
+
dynamic = [ "keywords", "description", "version", "dependencies", "optional-dependencies", "readme", "license", "authors", "classifiers", "entry-points", "scripts", "urls"]
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
[tool.uv]
|
|
11
|
+
cache-keys = [{ file = "pyproject.toml" }, { file = "settings.ini" }, { file = "setup.py" }]
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
[DEFAULT]
|
|
2
|
+
# All sections below are required unless otherwise specified.
|
|
3
|
+
# See https://github.com/AnswerDotAI/nbdev/blob/main/settings.ini for examples.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
### Python library ###
|
|
6
|
+
repo = llm_rsa
|
|
7
|
+
lib_name = %(repo)s
|
|
8
|
+
version = 0.0.1
|
|
9
|
+
min_python = 3.9
|
|
10
|
+
license = apache2
|
|
11
|
+
black_formatting = False
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### nbdev ###
|
|
14
|
+
doc_path = _docs
|
|
15
|
+
lib_path = llm_rsa
|
|
16
|
+
nbs_path = nbs
|
|
17
|
+
recursive = True
|
|
18
|
+
tst_flags = notest
|
|
19
|
+
put_version_in_init = True
|
|
20
|
+
update_pyproject = True
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
### Docs ###
|
|
23
|
+
branch = main
|
|
24
|
+
custom_sidebar = False
|
|
25
|
+
doc_host = https://%(user)s.github.io
|
|
26
|
+
doc_baseurl = /%(repo)s
|
|
27
|
+
git_url = https://github.com/%(user)s/%(repo)s
|
|
28
|
+
title = %(lib_name)s
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
### PyPI ###
|
|
31
|
+
audience = Developers
|
|
32
|
+
author = Risheek kumar B
|
|
33
|
+
author_email = b.risheekkumar@gmail.com
|
|
34
|
+
copyright = 2026 onwards, %(author)s
|
|
35
|
+
description = Recursive self aggregation
|
|
36
|
+
keywords = nbdev jupyter notebook python
|
|
37
|
+
language = English
|
|
38
|
+
status = 3
|
|
39
|
+
user = risheekkumarb
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### Optional ###
|
|
42
|
+
requirements = fastcore litellm
|
|
43
|
+
# dev_requirements =
|
|
44
|
+
# console_scripts =
|
|
45
|
+
# conda_user =
|
|
46
|
+
# package_data =
|
llm_rsa-0.0.1/setup.cfg
ADDED
llm_rsa-0.0.1/setup.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
from pkg_resources import parse_version
|
|
2
|
+
from configparser import ConfigParser
|
|
3
|
+
import setuptools, shlex
|
|
4
|
+
assert parse_version(setuptools.__version__)>=parse_version('36.2')
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# note: all settings are in settings.ini; edit there, not here
|
|
7
|
+
config = ConfigParser(delimiters=['='])
|
|
8
|
+
config.read('settings.ini', encoding='utf-8')
|
|
9
|
+
cfg = config['DEFAULT']
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
cfg_keys = 'version description keywords author author_email'.split()
|
|
12
|
+
expected = cfg_keys + "lib_name user branch license status min_python audience language".split()
|
|
13
|
+
for o in expected: assert o in cfg, "missing expected setting: {}".format(o)
|
|
14
|
+
setup_cfg = {o:cfg[o] for o in cfg_keys}
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
licenses = {
|
|
17
|
+
'apache2': 'Apache-2.0',
|
|
18
|
+
'mit': 'MIT',
|
|
19
|
+
'gpl2': 'GPL-2.0-only',
|
|
20
|
+
'gpl3': 'GPL-3.0-or-later',
|
|
21
|
+
'bsd3': 'BSD-3-Clause',
|
|
22
|
+
}
|
|
23
|
+
statuses = [ '1 - Planning', '2 - Pre-Alpha', '3 - Alpha',
|
|
24
|
+
'4 - Beta', '5 - Production/Stable', '6 - Mature', '7 - Inactive' ]
|
|
25
|
+
py_versions = '3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13'.split()
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
requirements = shlex.split(cfg.get('requirements', ''))
|
|
28
|
+
if cfg.get('pip_requirements'): requirements += shlex.split(cfg.get('pip_requirements', ''))
|
|
29
|
+
min_python = cfg['min_python']
|
|
30
|
+
dev_requirements = (cfg.get('dev_requirements') or '').split()
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
package_data = dict()
|
|
33
|
+
pkg_data = cfg.get('package_data', None)
|
|
34
|
+
if pkg_data:
|
|
35
|
+
package_data[cfg['lib_name']] = pkg_data.split() # split as multiple files might be listed
|
|
36
|
+
# Add package data to setup_cfg for setuptools.setup(..., **setup_cfg)
|
|
37
|
+
setup_cfg['package_data'] = package_data
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
setuptools.setup(
|
|
40
|
+
name = cfg['lib_name'],
|
|
41
|
+
license = licenses.get(cfg['license'].lower(), cfg['license']),
|
|
42
|
+
classifiers = [
|
|
43
|
+
'Development Status :: ' + statuses[int(cfg['status'])],
|
|
44
|
+
'Intended Audience :: ' + cfg['audience'].title(),
|
|
45
|
+
'Natural Language :: ' + cfg['language'].title(),
|
|
46
|
+
] + ['Programming Language :: Python :: '+o for o in py_versions[py_versions.index(min_python):]],
|
|
47
|
+
url = cfg['git_url'],
|
|
48
|
+
packages = setuptools.find_packages(),
|
|
49
|
+
include_package_data = True,
|
|
50
|
+
install_requires = requirements,
|
|
51
|
+
extras_require={ 'dev': dev_requirements },
|
|
52
|
+
dependency_links = cfg.get('dep_links','').split(),
|
|
53
|
+
python_requires = '>=' + cfg['min_python'],
|
|
54
|
+
long_description = open('README.md', encoding='utf-8').read(),
|
|
55
|
+
long_description_content_type = 'text/markdown',
|
|
56
|
+
zip_safe = False,
|
|
57
|
+
entry_points = {
|
|
58
|
+
'console_scripts': cfg.get('console_scripts','').split(),
|
|
59
|
+
'nbdev': [f'{cfg.get("lib_path")}={cfg.get("lib_path")}._modidx:d']
|
|
60
|
+
},
|
|
61
|
+
**setup_cfg)
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
|