lionagi 0.17.7__tar.gz → 0.17.9__tar.gz

{lionagi-0.17.7 → lionagi-0.17.9}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: lionagi
-Version: 0.17.7
+Version: 0.17.9
 Summary: An Intelligence Operating System.
 Author-email: HaiyangLi <quantocean.li@gmail.com>
 License:            Apache License

{lionagi-0.17.7 → lionagi-0.17.9}/benchmarks/README.md

@@ -4,12 +4,14 @@ This folder contains a lightweight benchmark runner for lionagi.ln.concurrency.
 It establishes a baseline for core patterns to help catch regressions.
 
 How to run (concurrency)
+
 - Asyncio backend (default):
   - `python -m benchmarks.concurrency_bench`
 - Trio backend:
   - `python -m benchmarks.concurrency_bench --backend trio`
 
 Options
+
 - `--backend {asyncio,trio}`: Select async backend (default: asyncio)
 - `--repeat N`: Repeat each scenario N times and report aggregates (default: 3)
 - `--json`: Also print JSON to stdout (besides saving to file)
@@ -17,6 +19,7 @@ Options
 - `--compare BASELINE.json`: Compare against a previous run and show deltas
 
 How to run (ln functions)
+
 - Asyncio backend (default):
   - `python -m benchmarks.ln_bench`
 - Trio backend:
@@ -25,11 +28,15 @@ How to run (ln functions)
 Options are the same as the concurrency runner.
 
 Results
-- Results are saved under `benchmarks/results/<timestamp>-<backend>.json` (concurrency)
-  and `benchmarks/results/ln-<timestamp>-<backend>.json` (ln functions) by default.
-- Each scenario reports min/mean/median/max (seconds) over the configured repeats.
+
+- Results are saved under `benchmarks/results/<timestamp>-<backend>.json`
+  (concurrency) and `benchmarks/results/ln-<timestamp>-<backend>.json` (ln
+  functions) by default.
+- Each scenario reports min/mean/median/max (seconds) over the configured
+  repeats.
 
 Scenarios (initial set)
+
 - gather_100_yield: 100 tasks, each yields once (sleep 0)
 - bounded_map_2000_limit_100: 2000 items, async no-op mapper, limit=100
 - completion_stream_1000_limit_100: 1000 awaitables streamed with limit=100
@@ -38,8 +45,11 @@ Scenarios (initial set)
 - taskgroup_start_1000_noop: start 1000 short-lived tasks
 
 Notes
+
 - Fuzzy utilities benches are available:
   - `python -m benchmarks.fuzzy_bench` (JSON parsing, extraction, key matching)
   - Outputs to `benchmarks/results/fuzzy-<timestamp>.json`
-- These are micro-benchmarks intended to detect relative changes, not absolute throughput.
-- Run on a quiet machine for less noisy results. Prefer CI runners for consistency.
+- These are micro-benchmarks intended to detect relative changes, not absolute
+  throughput.
+- Run on a quiet machine for less noisy results. Prefer CI runners for
+  consistency.

lionagi-0.17.9/benchmarks/comparisons/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
+# Agentic AI Framework Performance Benchmarks
+
+Rigorous apples-to-apples performance comparison of major Python agentic AI
+frameworks, focusing on real-world cold-start performance and memory efficiency.
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+- LionAGI delivers 25-45% faster cold-start performance than the next-best
+  framework (LangGraph) across composites, up to ~4.9× faster on a realistic
+  data-processing workload, and ~36% lower memory (RSS).
+
+### Key Results (20 runs per test • Python 3.10.15)
+
+- **Cold Composite Performance** (geomean of medians; excludes imports): LionAGI
+  **233 ms** vs LangGraph **421 ms** → **LangGraph is 81% slower** (**LionAGI is
+  45% faster**)
+- **Memory Efficiency**: LionAGI 40.5MB RSS vs LangGraph 63.3MB (36% lower)
+- **Consistency**: First-place performance in 4/4 cold-start categories
+- **Orchestrator Setup**: LionAGI 299ms vs LangGraph 410ms (37% faster)
+- **Operational impact**: ~**188 ms saved per cold start** vs LangGraph (≈ **3.1
+  min saved per 1k cold starts**)
+
+## Headline Performance Metrics
+
+### Cold Composite Performance (Geometric Mean of medians, excludes imports)
+
+| Rank | Framework      | Composite (ms) | RSS (MB) | USS (MB) | vs Best            |
+| ---- | -------------- | -------------- | -------- | -------- | ------------------ |
+| 1    | **LionAGI**    | 233.0          | 40.5     | 36.0     | —                  |
+| 2    | LangGraph      | 420.8          | 63.3     | 54.0     | **+80.6% slower**  |
+| 3    | LlamaIndex     | 803.0          | 130.1    | 113.8    | **+244.6% slower** |
+| 4    | AutoGen        | 1243.7         | 142.6    | 120.4    | **+433.6% slower** |
+| 5    | LangChain Core | 2260.4         | 248.8    | 188.4    | **+870.1% slower** |
+
+**Notes** • Composite excludes `imports` because sub-millisecond baselines
+(e.g., lazy imports) are dominated by timer granularity. • Conservative
+composite (excluding `data_processing`): LionAGI **322.5 ms** vs LangGraph
+**417.2 ms** → **LangGraph is 29% slower** (**LionAGI is 23% faster**).
+
+## Detailed Benchmark Results
+
+_Process isolation per run • Module cache cleared • CPU pinning enabled_
+
+### Orchestrators (Cold) - Production-Ready State
+
+| Framework      | Median (ms) | P95 (ms) | Range     | RSS (MB) | vs Best |
+| -------------- | ----------- | -------- | --------- | -------- | ------- |
+| **LionAGI**    | 299.4       | 347.1    | 284-412   | 45.7     | —       |
+| LangGraph      | 410.1       | 447.0    | 370-509   | 62.9     | +37.0%  |
+| LlamaIndex     | 838.3       | 932.2    | 781-972   | 143.0    | +180.0% |
+| AutoGen        | 1257.0      | 1347.8   | 1217-1502 | 142.8    | +319.8% |
+| LangChain Core | 2302.8      | 2846.5   | 2123-2978 | 248.0    | +669.1% |
+
+### Basic Primitives (Cold) - Core Building Blocks
+
+| Framework      | Median (ms) | P95 (ms) | Range     | RSS (MB) | vs Best |
+| -------------- | ----------- | -------- | --------- | -------- | ------- |
+| **LionAGI**    | 326.6       | 377.6    | 304-391   | 47.6     | —       |
+| LangGraph      | 409.0       | 540.0    | 376-649   | 63.8     | +25.2%  |
+| LlamaIndex     | 752.8       | 855.2    | 681-935   | 95.7     | +130.5% |
+| AutoGen        | 1228.9      | 1448.3   | 1156-1577 | 144.1    | +276.3% |
+| LangChain Core | 2267.0      | 2658.1   | 2070-3209 | 248.4    | +594.1% |
+
+### Workflow Setup (Cold) - Multi-Component Coordination
+
+| Framework      | Median (ms) | P95 (ms) | Range     | RSS (MB) | vs Best |
+| -------------- | ----------- | -------- | --------- | -------- | ------- |
+| **LionAGI**    | 343.0       | 421.5    | 307-576   | 48.4     | —       |
+| LangGraph      | 432.8       | 510.2    | 408-696   | 64.1     | +26.2%  |
+| LlamaIndex     | 814.3       | 890.7    | 786-996   | 141.0    | +137.4% |
+| AutoGen        | 1248.5      | 1340.9   | 1213-1558 | 141.4    | +264.0% |
+| LangChain Core | 2203.8      | 2579.5   | 2083-2720 | 251.4    | +542.5% |
+
+### Data Processing (Cold) - Realistic Workload
+
+| Framework      | Median (ms) | P95 (ms) | Range     | RSS (MB) | vs Best  |
+| -------------- | ----------- | -------- | --------- | -------- | -------- |
+| **LionAGI**    | 87.8        | 116.5    | 83-131    | 20.2     | —        |
+| LangGraph      | 432.0       | 509.8    | 403-541   | 62.4     | +392.0%  |
+| LlamaIndex     | 808.9       | 894.8    | 779-902   | 140.7    | +821.3%  |
+| AutoGen        | 1240.5      | 1391.1   | 1162-1541 | 142.1    | +1312.9% |
+| LangChain Core | 2269.0      | 2600.5   | 2084-2841 | 247.4    | +2484.3% |
+
+## Performance Analysis
+
+### Memory Efficiency
+
+- **LionAGI**: 40.5 MB average RSS (36.0 MB USS) — most memory efficient
+- **LangGraph**: 63.3 MB average RSS (**+56% vs LionAGI**)
+- **LlamaIndex**: 130.1 MB average RSS (**+221%**)
+- **AutoGen**: 142.6 MB average RSS (**+252%**)
+- **LangChain Core**: 248.8 MB average RSS (**+514%**)
+
+### Consistency & Reliability
+
+- **Low variability**: See CSV for MAD/stdev; LionAGI shows tight ranges in
+  cold-path categories.
+- **P95 performance**: Sub-400 ms P95 in most cold categories (orchestrators &
+  primitives).
+- **Range stability**: Small min-max spans across cold categories indicate
+  predictable cold behavior.
+
+## Feature Parity Matrix
+
+All frameworks tested with equivalent, normalized workloads:
+
+| Framework      | Object Built           | Core-Only | LLM Used | Network | Notes                     |
+| -------------- | ---------------------- | --------- | -------- | ------- | ------------------------- |
+| LionAGI        | Session()              | Yes       | None     | No      | Minimal runtime container |
+| LangGraph      | StateGraph.compile()   | Yes       | None     | No      | One-node identity graph   |
+| LangChain Core | PromptTemplate\|Lambda | Yes       | None     | No      | LCEL chain, no community  |
+| LlamaIndex     | SimpleChatEngine       | Yes       | MockLLM  | No      | Built-in mock, no network |
+| AutoGen        | ConversableAgent       | Yes       | None     | No      | LLM disabled              |
+
+## Methodology
+
+### Measurement Approach
+
+- **Cold Mode**: Full import + object construction (serverless scenario)
+- **Process Isolation**: Fresh Python interpreter per measurement
+- **Statistical Rigor**: Median, P95, MAD, trimmed mean for outlier resistance
+- **Memory Tracking**: RSS (Resident Set Size) and USS (Unique Set Size)
+
+### Environmental Controls
+
+- CPU pinning for reduced scheduler noise
+- Deterministic hashing (PYTHONHASHSEED=0)
+- Module cache clearing between runs
+- API keys blanked to prevent network calls
+- 30-second timeout to prevent hangs
+
+### Excluded from Headlines
+
+- **Import-only tests**: Dominated by lazy loading and timer granularity
+- **Sub-millisecond measurements**: Below meaningful timer resolution
+
+## Reproducing Results
+
+```bash
+# Clone repository
+git clone https://github.com/lion-agi/lionagi.git
+cd lionagi/benchmarks/comparisons
+
+# Install dependencies
+uv add --dev langgraph langchain-core llama-index-core pyautogen psutil
+# (Recommended) Pin exact versions for reproducibility
+uv lock
+# Or export a frozen requirements file:
+uv export --frozen --format requirements.txt > bench.requirements.txt
+
+# Run full benchmark (20 runs, ~15 minutes)
+uv run python benchmark_professional.py --runs 20 --report
+
+# Generate report
+uv run python generate_benchmark_report.py
+
+# Quick test (3 runs)
+uv run python benchmark_professional.py --runs 3
+```
+
+### Environment & Versions
+
+Test environment and package versions used for benchmarks:
+
+```
+Hardware: Apple M2 Max, 32GB RAM
+OS: macOS (Darwin 24.6.0)
+Python: 3.10.15
+LionAGI: v0.17.7
+langgraph: 0.6.7
+langchain-core: 0.3.76
+llama-index-core: 0.14.2
+pyautogen: 0.10.0
+psutil: 7.1.0
+```
+
+## Use Case Recommendations
+
+### When to Choose LionAGI
+
+- **Serverless/Lambda Functions**: 233ms cold start vs 421ms+ for alternatives
+- **Memory-Constrained Environments**: 36% lower memory footprint
+- **High-Frequency Operations**: Consistent sub-100ms data processing
+- **Cost-Sensitive Deployments**: Lower memory = more concurrent executions
+
+### Framework Selection Guide
+
+| Use Case              | Recommended | Reasoning                            |
+| --------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------ |
+| Serverless/Lambda     | LionAGI     | Fastest cold start (233ms composite) |
+| Memory-Limited        | LionAGI     | Lowest footprint (40.5MB)            |
+| State Machines        | LangGraph   | Purpose-built for graph workflows    |
+| Document RAG          | LlamaIndex  | Specialized document processing      |
+| Multi-Agent Chat      | AutoGen     | Conversation-focused patterns        |
+| Ecosystem Integration | LangChain   | Extensive tool library               |
+
+## Summary
+
+The benchmarks show LionAGI's performance characteristics in cold-start
+scenarios:
+
+- **25-45% faster** cold-start performance vs next-best across composites
+- Up to **~4.9× faster** on the data-processing workload
+- **36% lower memory usage** (40.5MB vs 63.3MB for LangGraph)
+- **Consistent performance** with tight P95 bounds and low variance
+- **Fast orchestrator initialization** at 299ms median
+
+These characteristics are relevant for:
+
+- Serverless and edge deployments where cold-start performance impacts costs
+- Applications with memory constraints or high concurrency requirements
+- Use cases requiring predictable performance characteristics
+
+---
+
+### Data Files
+
+- **Summary**: `benchmark_summary_*.csv` - Statistical aggregates
+- **Detailed**: `benchmark_detailed_*.csv` - Individual run data
+- **Full Export**: `benchmark_results_*.json` - Complete metadata
+
+_Last updated: September 2025 • LionAGI v0.17.7 • Python 3.10.15_ _Benchmark
+version: Apples-to-Apples Framework Benchmark v2.0_ _(composite excludes
+imports; see Methodology)_