lethe-delete 0.1.0__tar.gz
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/LICENSE +201 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/PKG-INFO +209 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/README.md +180 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/__init__.py +5 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/audit.py +83 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/cert_schema.py +82 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/certificate.py +126 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/cli.py +119 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/connectors/__init__.py +0 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/connectors/base.py +14 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/connectors/pgvector.py +33 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/connectors/pinecone.py +59 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/core.py +145 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/guard.py +112 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/hashing.py +11 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/integrations/__init__.py +0 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/integrations/langchain.py +226 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/ledger.py +53 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/mcp.py +356 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/models.py +34 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/schemas/certificate-v1.json +55 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/signing.py +45 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe/version.py +1 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe_delete.egg-info/PKG-INFO +209 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe_delete.egg-info/SOURCES.txt +46 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe_delete.egg-info/dependency_links.txt +1 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe_delete.egg-info/entry_points.txt +3 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe_delete.egg-info/requires.txt +12 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/lethe_delete.egg-info/top_level.txt +1 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/pyproject.toml +42 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/setup.cfg +4 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_audit.py +67 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_cert_schema.py +126 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_certificate.py +128 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_cli.py +127 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_core.py +123 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_forget_loop_audit.py +180 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_guard.py +103 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_hashing.py +20 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_langchain_integration.py +433 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_ledger.py +32 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_mcp.py +433 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_mcp_e2e.py +90 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_models.py +27 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_pgvector_connector.py +53 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_pinecone_connector.py +96 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_signing.py +22 -0
- lethe_delete-0.1.0/tests/test_smoke.py +5 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Apache License
|
|
2
|
+
Version 2.0, January 2004
|
|
3
|
+
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
1. Definitions.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
"License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
|
|
10
|
+
and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
|
|
13
|
+
the copyright owner that is granting the License.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
"Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
|
|
16
|
+
other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
|
|
17
|
+
control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
|
|
18
|
+
"control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
|
|
19
|
+
direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
|
|
20
|
+
otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
|
|
21
|
+
outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
"You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
|
|
24
|
+
exercising permissions granted by this License.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
"Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
|
|
27
|
+
including but not limited to software source code, documentation
|
|
28
|
+
source, and configuration files.
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
"Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
|
|
31
|
+
transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
|
|
32
|
+
not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
|
|
33
|
+
and conversions to other media types.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
"Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
|
|
36
|
+
Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
|
|
37
|
+
copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
|
|
38
|
+
(an example is provided in the Appendix below).
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
"Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
|
|
41
|
+
form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
|
|
42
|
+
editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
|
|
43
|
+
represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
|
|
44
|
+
of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
|
|
45
|
+
separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
|
|
46
|
+
the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
"Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
|
|
49
|
+
the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
|
|
50
|
+
to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
|
|
51
|
+
submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
|
|
52
|
+
or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
|
|
53
|
+
the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
|
|
54
|
+
means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
|
|
55
|
+
to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
|
|
56
|
+
communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
|
|
57
|
+
and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
|
|
58
|
+
Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
|
|
59
|
+
excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
|
|
60
|
+
designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
"Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
|
|
63
|
+
on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
|
|
64
|
+
subsequently incorporated within the Work.
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
|
|
67
|
+
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
|
|
68
|
+
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
|
|
69
|
+
copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
|
|
70
|
+
publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
|
|
71
|
+
Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
|
|
74
|
+
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
|
|
75
|
+
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
|
|
76
|
+
(except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
|
|
77
|
+
use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
|
|
78
|
+
where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
|
|
79
|
+
by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
|
|
80
|
+
Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
|
|
81
|
+
with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
|
|
82
|
+
institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
|
|
83
|
+
cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
|
|
84
|
+
or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
|
|
85
|
+
or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
|
|
86
|
+
granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
|
|
87
|
+
as of the date such litigation is filed.
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
|
|
90
|
+
Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
|
|
91
|
+
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
|
|
92
|
+
meet the following conditions:
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
(a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative
|
|
95
|
+
Works a copy of this License; and
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
(b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
|
|
98
|
+
stating that You changed the files; and
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
(c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
|
|
101
|
+
that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
|
|
102
|
+
attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
|
|
103
|
+
excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
|
|
104
|
+
the Derivative Works; and
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
(d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
|
|
107
|
+
distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
|
|
108
|
+
include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
|
|
109
|
+
within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
|
|
110
|
+
pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
|
|
111
|
+
of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
|
|
112
|
+
as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
|
|
113
|
+
documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
|
|
114
|
+
within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
|
|
115
|
+
wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
|
|
116
|
+
of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
|
|
117
|
+
do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
|
|
118
|
+
notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
|
|
119
|
+
or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
|
|
120
|
+
that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
|
|
121
|
+
as modifying the License.
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
|
|
124
|
+
may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
|
|
125
|
+
for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
|
|
126
|
+
for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
|
|
127
|
+
reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
|
|
128
|
+
the conditions stated in this License.
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
|
|
131
|
+
any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
|
|
132
|
+
by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
|
|
133
|
+
this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
|
|
134
|
+
Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
|
|
135
|
+
the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
|
|
136
|
+
with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
|
|
139
|
+
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
|
|
140
|
+
except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
|
|
141
|
+
origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
|
|
144
|
+
agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
|
|
145
|
+
Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
146
|
+
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
|
|
147
|
+
implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
|
|
148
|
+
of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
|
|
149
|
+
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
|
|
150
|
+
appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
|
|
151
|
+
risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
|
|
154
|
+
whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
|
|
155
|
+
unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
|
|
156
|
+
negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
|
|
157
|
+
liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
|
|
158
|
+
incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
|
|
159
|
+
result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
|
|
160
|
+
Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
|
|
161
|
+
work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
|
|
162
|
+
other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
|
|
163
|
+
has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
|
|
166
|
+
the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
|
|
167
|
+
and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
|
|
168
|
+
or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
|
|
169
|
+
License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
|
|
170
|
+
on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
|
|
171
|
+
of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
|
|
172
|
+
defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
|
|
173
|
+
incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
|
|
174
|
+
of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
176
|
+
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
178
|
+
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
|
|
181
|
+
boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
|
|
182
|
+
replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
|
|
183
|
+
the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
|
|
184
|
+
comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
|
|
185
|
+
file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
|
|
186
|
+
same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
|
|
187
|
+
identification within third-party archives.
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
Copyright 2026 BlueTier Operations
|
|
190
|
+
|
|
191
|
+
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
192
|
+
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
193
|
+
You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
194
|
+
|
|
195
|
+
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
197
|
+
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
198
|
+
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
199
|
+
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
200
|
+
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
201
|
+
limitations under the License.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Metadata-Version: 2.4
|
|
2
|
+
Name: lethe-delete
|
|
3
|
+
Version: 0.1.0
|
|
4
|
+
Summary: The forget button for AI — provable data-subject deletion for AI memory, with signed deletion certificates.
|
|
5
|
+
Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/bluetieroperations-create/lethe
|
|
6
|
+
Project-URL: Documentation, https://github.com/bluetieroperations-create/lethe/blob/main/docs/m2m.md
|
|
7
|
+
Keywords: gdpr,ccpa,dsar,right-to-be-forgotten,deletion,vector-database,rag,ai-memory,mcp,compliance
|
|
8
|
+
Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License
|
|
9
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
|
|
10
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11
|
|
11
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
|
|
12
|
+
Classifier: Topic :: Security
|
|
13
|
+
Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
|
|
14
|
+
Classifier: Operating System :: OS Independent
|
|
15
|
+
Requires-Python: >=3.11
|
|
16
|
+
Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
|
|
17
|
+
License-File: LICENSE
|
|
18
|
+
Requires-Dist: psycopg[binary]>=3.1
|
|
19
|
+
Requires-Dist: cryptography>=42
|
|
20
|
+
Requires-Dist: click>=8.1
|
|
21
|
+
Provides-Extra: dev
|
|
22
|
+
Requires-Dist: pytest>=8; extra == "dev"
|
|
23
|
+
Requires-Dist: jsonschema>=4.21; extra == "dev"
|
|
24
|
+
Requires-Dist: mcp>=1.9; extra == "dev"
|
|
25
|
+
Provides-Extra: mcp
|
|
26
|
+
Requires-Dist: mcp>=1.9; extra == "mcp"
|
|
27
|
+
Requires-Dist: jsonschema>=4.21; extra == "mcp"
|
|
28
|
+
Dynamic: license-file
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
# Lethe — the forget button for AI
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
**Everyone built AI memory. Nobody built the provable delete.** Lethe deletes a
|
|
33
|
+
person's data from your AI memory (vector store, RAG index, caches, logs) on a
|
|
34
|
+
GDPR/CCPA request — and hands you a **signed certificate** proving it happened.
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
Self-hosted: Lethe runs inside *your* infrastructure. The tool that erases your
|
|
37
|
+
data never becomes a new place your data goes.
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
> **Status:** v0.1, early but real. Connectors: **pgvector** + **Pinecone**.
|
|
40
|
+
> The full delete loop is tested end-to-end against real Postgres (pgvector);
|
|
41
|
+
> the Pinecone connector is unit-tested against a mock `Index`, not live
|
|
42
|
+
> Pinecone. Hardened through four rounds of adversarial self-review (internal,
|
|
43
|
+
> not third-party). Not yet on PyPI.
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
---
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
## Why
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
GDPR **Article 17** (right to erasure) covers personal data in agent memory —
|
|
50
|
+
conversation history, retrieved chunks, **and embeddings**. Fines reach 4% of
|
|
51
|
+
global revenue, and the EU's data-protection authorities are actively auditing
|
|
52
|
+
deletion (the EDPB's 2026 sweep checked 764 organizations and found "lack of
|
|
53
|
+
automated deletion mechanisms" almost everywhere). Meanwhile *no vector
|
|
54
|
+
database offers provable deletion* — teams hand-roll it.
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
If you sell AI to enterprises, you've probably hit the sharper version: a
|
|
57
|
+
customer's security review asks *"prove you can delete a user's data from your
|
|
58
|
+
AI,"* and you can't. Lethe is the answer you hand them.
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
## How it works
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
```
|
|
63
|
+
tag(subject → record) → forget(subject) → delete from your stores
|
|
64
|
+
→ verify the records are gone
|
|
65
|
+
→ signed deletion certificate
|
|
66
|
+
→ tamper-evident audit entry
|
|
67
|
+
```
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
You never have to remember to call `tag` everywhere: wrap your vector store
|
|
70
|
+
once and writes tag themselves.
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
## Quickstart (drop-in)
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
```bash
|
|
75
|
+
pip install -e . # from source for now (PyPI soon)
|
|
76
|
+
lethe keygen --out lethe_key.bin # one-time: your signing key (prints the public key)
|
|
77
|
+
export DATABASE_URL=... # your own Postgres
|
|
78
|
+
export LETHE_SALT=... # a secret; pseudonymizes subjects in the ledger
|
|
79
|
+
lethe init-db # creates Lethe's ledger + audit tables
|
|
80
|
+
```
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
Wire Lethe to your store, then **wrap your vector store** so every write is
|
|
83
|
+
tagged for deletion:
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
```python
|
|
86
|
+
import os, psycopg
|
|
87
|
+
from lethe import Lethe
|
|
88
|
+
from lethe.ledger import Ledger
|
|
89
|
+
from lethe.audit import AuditLog
|
|
90
|
+
from lethe.signing import Signer
|
|
91
|
+
from lethe.connectors.pgvector import PgVectorConnector
|
|
92
|
+
from lethe.integrations.langchain import LetheVectorStore
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
conn = psycopg.connect(os.environ["DATABASE_URL"])
|
|
95
|
+
lethe = Lethe(
|
|
96
|
+
ledger=Ledger(conn),
|
|
97
|
+
audit=AuditLog(conn),
|
|
98
|
+
signer=Signer.from_private_bytes(open("lethe_key.bin", "rb").read()),
|
|
99
|
+
connectors={"pgvector": PgVectorConnector(conn)},
|
|
100
|
+
salt=os.environ["LETHE_SALT"],
|
|
101
|
+
)
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
# Wrap once. Declare which metadata field names the data subject.
|
|
104
|
+
store = LetheVectorStore(
|
|
105
|
+
my_vectorstore, lethe, # any LangChain-style store
|
|
106
|
+
store="pgvector", namespace="docs",
|
|
107
|
+
subject_key="user_id",
|
|
108
|
+
id_key="doc_id", # recommended: bind ids from metadata
|
|
109
|
+
)
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
# Use it like a normal vector store — tagging happens automatically.
|
|
112
|
+
store.add_documents([Document(page_content="...",
|
|
113
|
+
metadata={"user_id": "alice@example.com",
|
|
114
|
+
"doc_id": "doc-123"})])
|
|
115
|
+
```
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
When a deletion request comes in:
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
```python
|
|
120
|
+
cert = lethe.forget("alice@example.com") # deletes everywhere + returns the certificate
|
|
121
|
+
```
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
Verify a certificate (pin the operator's *published* public key — a certificate
|
|
124
|
+
that vouches for itself proves nothing):
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
```python
|
|
127
|
+
from lethe.certificate import verify_certificate
|
|
128
|
+
assert verify_certificate(cert, trusted_public_key=PUBLISHED_PUBKEY)
|
|
129
|
+
```
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
## The certificate
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
Ed25519-signed, tamper-evident, independently verifiable. It states exactly what
|
|
134
|
+
happened and **scopes its claim honestly** — *"deleted across these retrieval
|
|
135
|
+
layers and verified absent,"* never "perfectly erased everywhere" (backups and
|
|
136
|
+
model weights are out of scope by definition). `verified_absent` means Lethe
|
|
137
|
+
re-queried the configured endpoint immediately after deleting and saw the
|
|
138
|
+
records gone *at issue time* — it is not a guarantee against read replicas,
|
|
139
|
+
query caches, or asynchronous propagation (notably Pinecone, whose deletes are
|
|
140
|
+
eventually consistent).
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
```json
|
|
143
|
+
{
|
|
144
|
+
"all_verified": true,
|
|
145
|
+
"records_deleted": 2,
|
|
146
|
+
"layers": [{"store": "pgvector", "namespace": "docs",
|
|
147
|
+
"deleted_count": 2, "verified_absent": true, "erased": true}],
|
|
148
|
+
"claim": "Deleted across the listed retrieval layers and verified absent. ...",
|
|
149
|
+
"signature": "…", "public_key": "…"
|
|
150
|
+
}
|
|
151
|
+
```
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
## CLI
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
| Command | Purpose |
|
|
156
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
157
|
+
| `lethe keygen --out KEY` | Create the Ed25519 signing key (prints the public key to publish) |
|
|
158
|
+
| `lethe init-db` | Create Lethe's ledger + audit tables in your Postgres |
|
|
159
|
+
| `lethe forget SUBJECT` | Delete a subject everywhere; prints the signed certificate |
|
|
160
|
+
| `lethe verify CERT --public-key PUB` | Verify a certificate against the operator's published key |
|
|
161
|
+
| `lethe audit-head` | Print the audit-log tip hash (record it out-of-band) |
|
|
162
|
+
| `lethe verify-audit --expected-head H` | Detect tampering/truncation of the audit log |
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
## For AI agents (MCP)
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
Lethe ships an MCP server so autonomous agents can execute provable deletion
|
|
167
|
+
and verify certificates machine-to-machine:
|
|
168
|
+
|
|
169
|
+
pip install "lethe-delete[mcp]"
|
|
170
|
+
lethe-mcp
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
Destructive deletes are two-step (preview → confirm token → forget), and any
|
|
173
|
+
agent can verify a certificate with zero infrastructure (you still need the
|
|
174
|
+
operator's published public key to pin against). Full guide:
|
|
175
|
+
[docs/m2m.md](docs/m2m.md).
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
## Security model & honest limits
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
- **Self-hosted.** The SDK and the provenance ledger run in your own Postgres.
|
|
180
|
+
Lethe-the-project never sees your data. The salt stays in your app.
|
|
181
|
+
- **No raw PII in the ledger.** Subjects are stored as HMAC-SHA256 hashes.
|
|
182
|
+
- **Verify with a pinned key.** An unpinned certificate check only proves
|
|
183
|
+
internal consistency; always pin your published public key.
|
|
184
|
+
- **`verified_absent` is a point-in-time re-query, not a replication proof.**
|
|
185
|
+
For eventually-consistent stores (Pinecone) a delete may not have propagated
|
|
186
|
+
to every replica at issue time. pgvector verifies read-your-writes on one
|
|
187
|
+
connection; a read-replica DSN would reintroduce the gap.
|
|
188
|
+
- **Audit truncation needs an out-of-band head.** Mid-chain edits are caught
|
|
189
|
+
automatically; detecting deletion of the *most recent* entries requires
|
|
190
|
+
recording `lethe audit-head` out-of-band and checking `verify-audit
|
|
191
|
+
--expected-head`.
|
|
192
|
+
- **Coverage = what flows through Lethe.** Writes that bypass the wrapper/`tag`
|
|
193
|
+
aren't tracked. Wrap your store, or tag explicitly.
|
|
194
|
+
- **Pre-existing data** (written before you adopted Lethe) needs retroactive
|
|
195
|
+
discovery — on the roadmap, not in v0.1.
|
|
196
|
+
- **Not erasure from backups or model weights.** Out of scope by design; the
|
|
197
|
+
certificate says so.
|
|
198
|
+
|
|
199
|
+
## Connectors
|
|
200
|
+
|
|
201
|
+
- **pgvector** (and any Postgres table) — `PgVectorConnector`
|
|
202
|
+
- **Pinecone** — `PineconeConnector` (pass your `Index`). Note: Pinecone
|
|
203
|
+
deletes are eventually consistent, so `verified_absent` is asserted at issue
|
|
204
|
+
time against the queried endpoint, not proven across replicas.
|
|
205
|
+
- Roadmap: Weaviate, Qdrant, Redis, conversation logs.
|
|
206
|
+
|
|
207
|
+
## License
|
|
208
|
+
|
|
209
|
+
[Apache-2.0](LICENSE) — permissive, with an explicit patent grant.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Lethe — the forget button for AI
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Everyone built AI memory. Nobody built the provable delete.** Lethe deletes a
|
|
4
|
+
person's data from your AI memory (vector store, RAG index, caches, logs) on a
|
|
5
|
+
GDPR/CCPA request — and hands you a **signed certificate** proving it happened.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Self-hosted: Lethe runs inside *your* infrastructure. The tool that erases your
|
|
8
|
+
data never becomes a new place your data goes.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
> **Status:** v0.1, early but real. Connectors: **pgvector** + **Pinecone**.
|
|
11
|
+
> The full delete loop is tested end-to-end against real Postgres (pgvector);
|
|
12
|
+
> the Pinecone connector is unit-tested against a mock `Index`, not live
|
|
13
|
+
> Pinecone. Hardened through four rounds of adversarial self-review (internal,
|
|
14
|
+
> not third-party). Not yet on PyPI.
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
---
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Why
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
GDPR **Article 17** (right to erasure) covers personal data in agent memory —
|
|
21
|
+
conversation history, retrieved chunks, **and embeddings**. Fines reach 4% of
|
|
22
|
+
global revenue, and the EU's data-protection authorities are actively auditing
|
|
23
|
+
deletion (the EDPB's 2026 sweep checked 764 organizations and found "lack of
|
|
24
|
+
automated deletion mechanisms" almost everywhere). Meanwhile *no vector
|
|
25
|
+
database offers provable deletion* — teams hand-roll it.
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
If you sell AI to enterprises, you've probably hit the sharper version: a
|
|
28
|
+
customer's security review asks *"prove you can delete a user's data from your
|
|
29
|
+
AI,"* and you can't. Lethe is the answer you hand them.
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
## How it works
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
```
|
|
34
|
+
tag(subject → record) → forget(subject) → delete from your stores
|
|
35
|
+
→ verify the records are gone
|
|
36
|
+
→ signed deletion certificate
|
|
37
|
+
→ tamper-evident audit entry
|
|
38
|
+
```
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
You never have to remember to call `tag` everywhere: wrap your vector store
|
|
41
|
+
once and writes tag themselves.
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
## Quickstart (drop-in)
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
```bash
|
|
46
|
+
pip install -e . # from source for now (PyPI soon)
|
|
47
|
+
lethe keygen --out lethe_key.bin # one-time: your signing key (prints the public key)
|
|
48
|
+
export DATABASE_URL=... # your own Postgres
|
|
49
|
+
export LETHE_SALT=... # a secret; pseudonymizes subjects in the ledger
|
|
50
|
+
lethe init-db # creates Lethe's ledger + audit tables
|
|
51
|
+
```
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
Wire Lethe to your store, then **wrap your vector store** so every write is
|
|
54
|
+
tagged for deletion:
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
```python
|
|
57
|
+
import os, psycopg
|
|
58
|
+
from lethe import Lethe
|
|
59
|
+
from lethe.ledger import Ledger
|
|
60
|
+
from lethe.audit import AuditLog
|
|
61
|
+
from lethe.signing import Signer
|
|
62
|
+
from lethe.connectors.pgvector import PgVectorConnector
|
|
63
|
+
from lethe.integrations.langchain import LetheVectorStore
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
conn = psycopg.connect(os.environ["DATABASE_URL"])
|
|
66
|
+
lethe = Lethe(
|
|
67
|
+
ledger=Ledger(conn),
|
|
68
|
+
audit=AuditLog(conn),
|
|
69
|
+
signer=Signer.from_private_bytes(open("lethe_key.bin", "rb").read()),
|
|
70
|
+
connectors={"pgvector": PgVectorConnector(conn)},
|
|
71
|
+
salt=os.environ["LETHE_SALT"],
|
|
72
|
+
)
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
# Wrap once. Declare which metadata field names the data subject.
|
|
75
|
+
store = LetheVectorStore(
|
|
76
|
+
my_vectorstore, lethe, # any LangChain-style store
|
|
77
|
+
store="pgvector", namespace="docs",
|
|
78
|
+
subject_key="user_id",
|
|
79
|
+
id_key="doc_id", # recommended: bind ids from metadata
|
|
80
|
+
)
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
# Use it like a normal vector store — tagging happens automatically.
|
|
83
|
+
store.add_documents([Document(page_content="...",
|
|
84
|
+
metadata={"user_id": "alice@example.com",
|
|
85
|
+
"doc_id": "doc-123"})])
|
|
86
|
+
```
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
When a deletion request comes in:
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
```python
|
|
91
|
+
cert = lethe.forget("alice@example.com") # deletes everywhere + returns the certificate
|
|
92
|
+
```
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
Verify a certificate (pin the operator's *published* public key — a certificate
|
|
95
|
+
that vouches for itself proves nothing):
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
```python
|
|
98
|
+
from lethe.certificate import verify_certificate
|
|
99
|
+
assert verify_certificate(cert, trusted_public_key=PUBLISHED_PUBKEY)
|
|
100
|
+
```
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
## The certificate
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
Ed25519-signed, tamper-evident, independently verifiable. It states exactly what
|
|
105
|
+
happened and **scopes its claim honestly** — *"deleted across these retrieval
|
|
106
|
+
layers and verified absent,"* never "perfectly erased everywhere" (backups and
|
|
107
|
+
model weights are out of scope by definition). `verified_absent` means Lethe
|
|
108
|
+
re-queried the configured endpoint immediately after deleting and saw the
|
|
109
|
+
records gone *at issue time* — it is not a guarantee against read replicas,
|
|
110
|
+
query caches, or asynchronous propagation (notably Pinecone, whose deletes are
|
|
111
|
+
eventually consistent).
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
```json
|
|
114
|
+
{
|
|
115
|
+
"all_verified": true,
|
|
116
|
+
"records_deleted": 2,
|
|
117
|
+
"layers": [{"store": "pgvector", "namespace": "docs",
|
|
118
|
+
"deleted_count": 2, "verified_absent": true, "erased": true}],
|
|
119
|
+
"claim": "Deleted across the listed retrieval layers and verified absent. ...",
|
|
120
|
+
"signature": "…", "public_key": "…"
|
|
121
|
+
}
|
|
122
|
+
```
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
## CLI
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
| Command | Purpose |
|
|
127
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
128
|
+
| `lethe keygen --out KEY` | Create the Ed25519 signing key (prints the public key to publish) |
|
|
129
|
+
| `lethe init-db` | Create Lethe's ledger + audit tables in your Postgres |
|
|
130
|
+
| `lethe forget SUBJECT` | Delete a subject everywhere; prints the signed certificate |
|
|
131
|
+
| `lethe verify CERT --public-key PUB` | Verify a certificate against the operator's published key |
|
|
132
|
+
| `lethe audit-head` | Print the audit-log tip hash (record it out-of-band) |
|
|
133
|
+
| `lethe verify-audit --expected-head H` | Detect tampering/truncation of the audit log |
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
## For AI agents (MCP)
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
Lethe ships an MCP server so autonomous agents can execute provable deletion
|
|
138
|
+
and verify certificates machine-to-machine:
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
pip install "lethe-delete[mcp]"
|
|
141
|
+
lethe-mcp
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
Destructive deletes are two-step (preview → confirm token → forget), and any
|
|
144
|
+
agent can verify a certificate with zero infrastructure (you still need the
|
|
145
|
+
operator's published public key to pin against). Full guide:
|
|
146
|
+
[docs/m2m.md](docs/m2m.md).
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
## Security model & honest limits
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
- **Self-hosted.** The SDK and the provenance ledger run in your own Postgres.
|
|
151
|
+
Lethe-the-project never sees your data. The salt stays in your app.
|
|
152
|
+
- **No raw PII in the ledger.** Subjects are stored as HMAC-SHA256 hashes.
|
|
153
|
+
- **Verify with a pinned key.** An unpinned certificate check only proves
|
|
154
|
+
internal consistency; always pin your published public key.
|
|
155
|
+
- **`verified_absent` is a point-in-time re-query, not a replication proof.**
|
|
156
|
+
For eventually-consistent stores (Pinecone) a delete may not have propagated
|
|
157
|
+
to every replica at issue time. pgvector verifies read-your-writes on one
|
|
158
|
+
connection; a read-replica DSN would reintroduce the gap.
|
|
159
|
+
- **Audit truncation needs an out-of-band head.** Mid-chain edits are caught
|
|
160
|
+
automatically; detecting deletion of the *most recent* entries requires
|
|
161
|
+
recording `lethe audit-head` out-of-band and checking `verify-audit
|
|
162
|
+
--expected-head`.
|
|
163
|
+
- **Coverage = what flows through Lethe.** Writes that bypass the wrapper/`tag`
|
|
164
|
+
aren't tracked. Wrap your store, or tag explicitly.
|
|
165
|
+
- **Pre-existing data** (written before you adopted Lethe) needs retroactive
|
|
166
|
+
discovery — on the roadmap, not in v0.1.
|
|
167
|
+
- **Not erasure from backups or model weights.** Out of scope by design; the
|
|
168
|
+
certificate says so.
|
|
169
|
+
|
|
170
|
+
## Connectors
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
- **pgvector** (and any Postgres table) — `PgVectorConnector`
|
|
173
|
+
- **Pinecone** — `PineconeConnector` (pass your `Index`). Note: Pinecone
|
|
174
|
+
deletes are eventually consistent, so `verified_absent` is asserted at issue
|
|
175
|
+
time against the queried endpoint, not proven across replicas.
|
|
176
|
+
- Roadmap: Weaviate, Qdrant, Redis, conversation logs.
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
178
|
+
## License
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
[Apache-2.0](LICENSE) — permissive, with an explicit patent grant.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import hashlib
|
|
2
|
+
import hmac
|
|
3
|
+
import json
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
import psycopg
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
GENESIS = "0" * 64
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
AUDIT_SCHEMA = """
|
|
10
|
+
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS lethe_audit (
|
|
11
|
+
seq BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
|
|
12
|
+
entry JSONB NOT NULL,
|
|
13
|
+
prev_hash TEXT NOT NULL,
|
|
14
|
+
entry_hash TEXT NOT NULL,
|
|
15
|
+
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT now()
|
|
16
|
+
);
|
|
17
|
+
"""
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
def _entry_hash(prev_hash: str, entry: dict) -> str:
|
|
21
|
+
data = prev_hash + json.dumps(entry, sort_keys=True, separators=(",", ":"))
|
|
22
|
+
return hashlib.sha256(data.encode()).hexdigest()
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
class AuditLog:
|
|
26
|
+
def __init__(self, conn: psycopg.Connection):
|
|
27
|
+
self.conn = conn
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
def init_schema(self) -> None:
|
|
30
|
+
with self.conn.cursor() as cur:
|
|
31
|
+
cur.execute(AUDIT_SCHEMA)
|
|
32
|
+
self.conn.commit()
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
def _last_hash(self) -> str:
|
|
35
|
+
with self.conn.cursor() as cur:
|
|
36
|
+
cur.execute("SELECT entry_hash FROM lethe_audit ORDER BY seq DESC LIMIT 1")
|
|
37
|
+
row = cur.fetchone()
|
|
38
|
+
return row[0] if row else GENESIS
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
def append(self, entry: dict) -> str:
|
|
41
|
+
prev = self._last_hash()
|
|
42
|
+
h = _entry_hash(prev, entry)
|
|
43
|
+
with self.conn.cursor() as cur:
|
|
44
|
+
cur.execute(
|
|
45
|
+
"INSERT INTO lethe_audit (entry, prev_hash, entry_hash) VALUES (%s, %s, %s)",
|
|
46
|
+
(json.dumps(entry), prev, h),
|
|
47
|
+
)
|
|
48
|
+
self.conn.commit()
|
|
49
|
+
return h
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
def head(self) -> str:
|
|
52
|
+
"""Current tip hash (GENESIS if the log is empty). Record this
|
|
53
|
+
out-of-band; later pass it to verify_chain(expected_head=...) to detect
|
|
54
|
+
tip-truncation (deletion of the most recent entries)."""
|
|
55
|
+
return self._last_hash()
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
def verify_chain(self, expected_head: str | None = None) -> bool:
|
|
58
|
+
"""Verify the hash chain links from genesis to the current tip.
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
SECURITY: an internal walk proves no entry was *altered* or removed from
|
|
61
|
+
the *middle* (that breaks a prev_hash link), but it CANNOT detect tip
|
|
62
|
+
truncation — deleting the most recent entries leaves a self-consistent,
|
|
63
|
+
merely shorter chain. To catch an attacker lopping off the tail (erasing
|
|
64
|
+
evidence of recent erasures), the operator must record the head hash
|
|
65
|
+
out-of-band and pass it as ``expected_head`` — the same pin-it-externally
|
|
66
|
+
discipline the certificate uses for the trusted public key. With no
|
|
67
|
+
entries the head is ``GENESIS``.
|
|
68
|
+
"""
|
|
69
|
+
with self.conn.cursor() as cur:
|
|
70
|
+
cur.execute(
|
|
71
|
+
"SELECT entry, prev_hash, entry_hash FROM lethe_audit ORDER BY seq ASC"
|
|
72
|
+
)
|
|
73
|
+
rows = cur.fetchall()
|
|
74
|
+
prev = GENESIS
|
|
75
|
+
for entry, prev_hash, entry_hash in rows:
|
|
76
|
+
if prev_hash != prev:
|
|
77
|
+
return False
|
|
78
|
+
if _entry_hash(prev_hash, entry) != entry_hash:
|
|
79
|
+
return False
|
|
80
|
+
prev = entry_hash
|
|
81
|
+
if expected_head is not None and not hmac.compare_digest(prev, expected_head):
|
|
82
|
+
return False
|
|
83
|
+
return True
|