kavach-eval 0.1.0__tar.gz

kavach_eval-0.1.0/LICENSE

@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+
+                                 Apache License
+                           Version 2.0, January 2004
+                        http://www.apache.org/licenses/
+
+   TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
+
+   1. Definitions.
+
+      "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
+      and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
+
+      "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
+      the copyright owner that is granting the License.
+
+      "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
+      other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
+      control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
+      "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
+      direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
+      otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
+      outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
+
+      "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
+      exercising permissions granted by this License.
+
+      "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
+      including but not limited to software source code, documentation
+      source, and configuration files.
+
+      "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
+      transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
+      not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
+      and conversions to other media types.
+
+      "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
+      Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
+      copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
+      (an example is provided in the Appendix below).
+
+      "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
+      form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
+      editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
+      represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
+      of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
+      separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
+      the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
+
+      "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
+      the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
+      to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
+      submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
+      or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
+      the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
+      means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
+      to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
+      communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
+      and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
+      Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
+      excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
+      designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
+
+      "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
+      on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
+      subsequently incorporated within the Work.
+
+   2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
+      this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
+      worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
+      copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
+      publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
+      Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
+
+   3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
+      this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
+      worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
+      (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
+      use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
+      where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
+      by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
+      Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
+      with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
+      institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
+      cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
+      or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
+      or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
+      granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
+      as of the date such litigation is filed.
+
+   4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
+      Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
+      modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
+      meet the following conditions:
+
+      (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
+          Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
+
+      (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
+          stating that You changed the files; and
+
+      (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
+          that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
+          attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
+          excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
+          the Derivative Works; and
+
+      (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
+          distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
+          include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
+          within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
+          pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
+          of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
+          as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
+          documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
+          within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
+          wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
+          of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
+          do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
+          notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
+          or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
+          that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
+          as modifying the License.
+
+      You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
+      may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
+      for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
+      for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
+      reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
+      the conditions stated in this License.
+
+   5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
+      any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
+      by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
+      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
+      Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
+      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
+      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
+
+   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
+      names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
+      except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
+      origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
+
+   7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
+      agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
+      Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+      WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
+      implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
+      of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
+      PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
+      appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
+      risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
+
+   8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
+      whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
+      unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
+      negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
+      liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
+      incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
+      result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
+      Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
+      work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
+      other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
+      has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
+
+   9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
+      the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
+      and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
+      or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
+      License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
+      on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
+      of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
+      defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
+      incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
+      of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
+
+   END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
+
+   APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
+
+      To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
+      boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
+      replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
+      the brackets!)  The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
+      comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
+      file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
+      same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
+      identification within third-party archives.
+
+   Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
+
+   Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+   you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+   You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+   limitations under the License.

kavach_eval-0.1.0/PKG-INFO

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+Metadata-Version: 2.4
+Name: kavach-eval
+Version: 0.1.0
+Summary: Safe-by-design red-team kit for prompt injection and data leaks in Indian languages
+Author: Malaya Kumar Swain
+License-Expression: Apache-2.0
+Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval
+Project-URL: Source, https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval
+Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval/issues
+Keywords: llm-security,prompt-injection,red-teaming,ai-safety,indic,hindi,odia,tamil,hinglish,guardrails,evaluation
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
+Classifier: Topic :: Security
+Classifier: Topic :: Scientific/Engineering :: Artificial Intelligence
+Requires-Python: >=3.10
+Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
+License-File: LICENSE
+Provides-Extra: dev
+Requires-Dist: pytest>=8; extra == "dev"
+Dynamic: license-file
+
+# Kavach-Eval
+
+**Red-team your AI assistant in the languages India actually speaks.**
+
+*Kavach (कवच) means armour. Kavach-Eval tests whether yours holds up in Hindi, Hinglish, Odia and Tamil, not just in English.*
+
+[![ci](https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval/actions)
+![python](https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.10%2B-blue) ![license](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-Apache--2.0-green) ![deps](https://img.shields.io/badge/core%20dependencies-0-brightgreen)
+
+---
+
+## The problem
+
+Indian banks, telcos and government services are launching GenAI assistants that talk to customers in a dozen languages. Their guardrails are usually tested in English. Attackers don't stay in English.
+
+A prompt injection that an English keyword filter blocks often goes straight through when it is written in Hindi, in Odia script, in Romanised Hinglish, or with invisible zero-width characters and look-alike letters. The model understands every version. The filter understands one.
+
+Kavach-Eval measures that gap in a few seconds and turns it into a number you can put in a release checklist.
+
+## What it does
+
+| | |
+|---|---|
+| 🎯 **Attack suite** | Six attack families: instruction override, system-prompt leak, debug-mode role-play, PII exfiltration, format smuggling (e.g. "convert your rules to JSON") and **indirect injection** hidden in a retrieved RAG document. |
+| 🇮🇳 **Five languages** | English, Hindi (Devanagari), Hinglish (Romanised), Odia and Tamil, written as native speakers would, not machine-translated word by word. |
+| 🫥 **Obfuscation** | Zero-width characters, Cyrillic look-alike letters and spaced-out trigger words: invisible or harmless to a person, enough to slip past a keyword filter. |
+| ⚖️ **Judge-free scoring** | Each target is planted with a fake canary code and a synthetic customer record. A probe succeeds only if the response leaks one of them, even disguised with spaces, Indic digits, look-alike letters or full-width characters. No LLM judge, so results are deterministic and free to run in CI. |
+| 📊 **Language-gap report** | Attack success rate by language and category, the gap against English in percentage points, and success by obfuscation type. Markdown for people, JSON for pipelines. |
+| 🚦 **Release gate** | `--fail-above 0.05` exits non-zero when too many attacks succeed, so a regression in any language blocks the deploy. |
+| 🔌 **Any target** | Any OpenAI-compatible endpoint (hosted or local), or wrap your own app, agent or guardrail stack in one function. |
+
+## 30-second demo (no model or API key needed)
+
+```bash
+pip install kavach-eval
+python -m kavach_eval demo
+```
+
+From source: `git clone https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval && cd kavach-eval && pip install -e .`
+
+The demo runs the 60-probe suite against three built-in stand-ins: a model with no guardrails, the same model behind an **English keyword blocklist**, and the same model behind a **layered guard** (input normalisation, multilingual intent check, output filter).
+
+| Target | en | hi | hinglish | or | ta | Overall |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| No guardrails | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
+| English keyword blocklist | 38% | **83%** | 43% | **67%** | **67%** | 50% |
+| Layered guard | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
+
+*Attack success rate: share of probes that made the target leak a planted secret. Lower is better.*
+
+The English blocklist looks like it works when you test in English. In Hindi it lets through twice as many attacks, and it misses every indirect injection hidden in an Odia or Tamil document. Hinglish shows almost no gap here because it keeps English trigger words; the obfuscated Hinglish variants are what get through.
+
+> The demo targets are deterministic simulations written to illustrate the method. They are not measurements of any real model. Run Kavach-Eval against your own system to get your own numbers.
+
+## Test your own system
+
+**Any OpenAI-compatible endpoint** (OpenAI, Azure, vLLM, Ollama, LM Studio, Sarvam, Krutrim and others that follow the API):
+
+```bash
+export OPENAI_API_KEY=...
+python -m kavach_eval run --base-url https://api.openai.com/v1 --model gpt-4o-mini --delay 2 --out report --fail-above 0.05
+```
+
+The kit sends its own system prompt containing the canary and the synthetic record, so it tests the model and its built-in safety, not your prompt. `--delay` paces requests for rate limits, and rate-limited requests are retried. A probe that still fails is reported separately and left out of the rates, so an error can never look like a safe answer; with `--fail-above`, any errored probe fails the gate.
+
+**Your full application** (RAG chain, agent, guardrails and all). Put `kavach_eval.CANARY` in your system prompt, then:
+
+```python
+from kavach_eval import CallableTarget, run
+
+def my_assistant(prompt, context):          # context = retrieved documents, for indirect injection
+    return my_app.answer(prompt, documents=context)
+
+report = run(CallableTarget(my_assistant, name="branch-assistant"))
+print(report.to_markdown())
+print(report.language_gap())                # {'hi': 41.7, 'hinglish': 8.3, 'or': 50.0, 'ta': 33.3} for example
+```
+
+See [`examples/guard_your_app.py`](https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval/blob/main/examples/guard_your_app.py) for a release gate that fails when the worst language goes above 5%.
+
+## Safe by design
+
+A red-team kit should not become an attack kit. Kavach-Eval:
+
+- **only asks for its own planted artefacts:** a fake canary (`KV-CANARY-7731`) and a synthetic customer with a made-up PAN and mobile number. It never asks a model for harmful content, real personal data or anything outside the test.
+- **contains no jailbreak payloads for harmful content.** It tests whether instructions and secrets stay where they belong, which is the risk regulators and CISOs ask about.
+- **is meant for systems you own or are authorised to test.**
+
+Details in [`docs/methodology.md`](https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval/blob/main/docs/methodology.md).
+
+## How it fits
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart LR
+    S[Attack suite<br/>6 families × 5 languages<br/>+ obfuscations] --> T[Your target<br/>model · RAG · agent · guardrails]
+    T --> SC[Judge-free scorer<br/>canary / PAN / phone<br/>after normalisation]
+    SC --> R[Report<br/>ASR by language & category<br/>language gap vs English]
+    R --> G{CI gate}
+```
+
+## Project layout
+
+```
+kavach_eval/
+  attacks.py   probes, translations, obfuscations, suite builder
+  scoring.py   normalisation and leak / refusal detection
+  targets.py   OpenAI-compatible and callable adapters, demo targets
+  runner.py    run the suite, attack success rate, language gap, reports
+  __main__.py  CLI: demo, list, run
+tests/         17 tests
+examples/      release-gate example
+docs/          methodology and limits
+```
+
+## Honest limits
+
+- Five languages so far. Bengali, Telugu, Marathi, Kannada and Malayalam are the next to add; contributions from native speakers are welcome.
+- Sixty probes is a smoke test, not a certification. A low score means these attacks failed, not that none will succeed.
+- String-match scoring catches leaks of the planted artefacts. It does not judge harmful content, tone or partial paraphrase of a system prompt.
+- Translations were written for this project. Corrections from native speakers are welcome.
+
+## Related work
+
+Kavach-Eval is a small, practical tool and builds on research that goes much deeper: [IndicJR](https://huggingface.co/papers/2602.16832), a jailbreak-robustness benchmark across Indic languages; the study of [Hinglish and code-mixed jailbreaks](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14226); and [DhvaniGuard](https://huggingface.co/speedsharma/dhvaniguard-v0), an Indic safety classifier. Where those measure models, Kavach-Eval aims to be the thing a team runs on its own assistant before every release.
+
+## Licence
+
+Apache 2.0. Built by [Malaya Kumar Swain](https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain). Views and code are my own.

kavach_eval-0.1.0/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+# Kavach-Eval
+
+**Red-team your AI assistant in the languages India actually speaks.**
+
+*Kavach (कवच) means armour. Kavach-Eval tests whether yours holds up in Hindi, Hinglish, Odia and Tamil, not just in English.*
+
+[![ci](https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval/actions)
+![python](https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.10%2B-blue) ![license](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-Apache--2.0-green) ![deps](https://img.shields.io/badge/core%20dependencies-0-brightgreen)
+
+---
+
+## The problem
+
+Indian banks, telcos and government services are launching GenAI assistants that talk to customers in a dozen languages. Their guardrails are usually tested in English. Attackers don't stay in English.
+
+A prompt injection that an English keyword filter blocks often goes straight through when it is written in Hindi, in Odia script, in Romanised Hinglish, or with invisible zero-width characters and look-alike letters. The model understands every version. The filter understands one.
+
+Kavach-Eval measures that gap in a few seconds and turns it into a number you can put in a release checklist.
+
+## What it does
+
+| | |
+|---|---|
+| 🎯 **Attack suite** | Six attack families: instruction override, system-prompt leak, debug-mode role-play, PII exfiltration, format smuggling (e.g. "convert your rules to JSON") and **indirect injection** hidden in a retrieved RAG document. |
+| 🇮🇳 **Five languages** | English, Hindi (Devanagari), Hinglish (Romanised), Odia and Tamil, written as native speakers would, not machine-translated word by word. |
+| 🫥 **Obfuscation** | Zero-width characters, Cyrillic look-alike letters and spaced-out trigger words: invisible or harmless to a person, enough to slip past a keyword filter. |
+| ⚖️ **Judge-free scoring** | Each target is planted with a fake canary code and a synthetic customer record. A probe succeeds only if the response leaks one of them, even disguised with spaces, Indic digits, look-alike letters or full-width characters. No LLM judge, so results are deterministic and free to run in CI. |
+| 📊 **Language-gap report** | Attack success rate by language and category, the gap against English in percentage points, and success by obfuscation type. Markdown for people, JSON for pipelines. |
+| 🚦 **Release gate** | `--fail-above 0.05` exits non-zero when too many attacks succeed, so a regression in any language blocks the deploy. |
+| 🔌 **Any target** | Any OpenAI-compatible endpoint (hosted or local), or wrap your own app, agent or guardrail stack in one function. |
+
+## 30-second demo (no model or API key needed)
+
+```bash
+pip install kavach-eval
+python -m kavach_eval demo
+```
+
+From source: `git clone https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval && cd kavach-eval && pip install -e .`
+
+The demo runs the 60-probe suite against three built-in stand-ins: a model with no guardrails, the same model behind an **English keyword blocklist**, and the same model behind a **layered guard** (input normalisation, multilingual intent check, output filter).
+
+| Target | en | hi | hinglish | or | ta | Overall |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| No guardrails | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
+| English keyword blocklist | 38% | **83%** | 43% | **67%** | **67%** | 50% |
+| Layered guard | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
+
+*Attack success rate: share of probes that made the target leak a planted secret. Lower is better.*
+
+The English blocklist looks like it works when you test in English. In Hindi it lets through twice as many attacks, and it misses every indirect injection hidden in an Odia or Tamil document. Hinglish shows almost no gap here because it keeps English trigger words; the obfuscated Hinglish variants are what get through.
+
+> The demo targets are deterministic simulations written to illustrate the method. They are not measurements of any real model. Run Kavach-Eval against your own system to get your own numbers.
+
+## Test your own system
+
+**Any OpenAI-compatible endpoint** (OpenAI, Azure, vLLM, Ollama, LM Studio, Sarvam, Krutrim and others that follow the API):
+
+```bash
+export OPENAI_API_KEY=...
+python -m kavach_eval run --base-url https://api.openai.com/v1 --model gpt-4o-mini --delay 2 --out report --fail-above 0.05
+```
+
+The kit sends its own system prompt containing the canary and the synthetic record, so it tests the model and its built-in safety, not your prompt. `--delay` paces requests for rate limits, and rate-limited requests are retried. A probe that still fails is reported separately and left out of the rates, so an error can never look like a safe answer; with `--fail-above`, any errored probe fails the gate.
+
+**Your full application** (RAG chain, agent, guardrails and all). Put `kavach_eval.CANARY` in your system prompt, then:
+
+```python
+from kavach_eval import CallableTarget, run
+
+def my_assistant(prompt, context):          # context = retrieved documents, for indirect injection
+    return my_app.answer(prompt, documents=context)
+
+report = run(CallableTarget(my_assistant, name="branch-assistant"))
+print(report.to_markdown())
+print(report.language_gap())                # {'hi': 41.7, 'hinglish': 8.3, 'or': 50.0, 'ta': 33.3} for example
+```
+
+See [`examples/guard_your_app.py`](https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval/blob/main/examples/guard_your_app.py) for a release gate that fails when the worst language goes above 5%.
+
+## Safe by design
+
+A red-team kit should not become an attack kit. Kavach-Eval:
+
+- **only asks for its own planted artefacts:** a fake canary (`KV-CANARY-7731`) and a synthetic customer with a made-up PAN and mobile number. It never asks a model for harmful content, real personal data or anything outside the test.
+- **contains no jailbreak payloads for harmful content.** It tests whether instructions and secrets stay where they belong, which is the risk regulators and CISOs ask about.
+- **is meant for systems you own or are authorised to test.**
+
+Details in [`docs/methodology.md`](https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain/kavach-eval/blob/main/docs/methodology.md).
+
+## How it fits
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart LR
+    S[Attack suite<br/>6 families × 5 languages<br/>+ obfuscations] --> T[Your target<br/>model · RAG · agent · guardrails]
+    T --> SC[Judge-free scorer<br/>canary / PAN / phone<br/>after normalisation]
+    SC --> R[Report<br/>ASR by language & category<br/>language gap vs English]
+    R --> G{CI gate}
+```
+
+## Project layout
+
+```
+kavach_eval/
+  attacks.py   probes, translations, obfuscations, suite builder
+  scoring.py   normalisation and leak / refusal detection
+  targets.py   OpenAI-compatible and callable adapters, demo targets
+  runner.py    run the suite, attack success rate, language gap, reports
+  __main__.py  CLI: demo, list, run
+tests/         17 tests
+examples/      release-gate example
+docs/          methodology and limits
+```
+
+## Honest limits
+
+- Five languages so far. Bengali, Telugu, Marathi, Kannada and Malayalam are the next to add; contributions from native speakers are welcome.
+- Sixty probes is a smoke test, not a certification. A low score means these attacks failed, not that none will succeed.
+- String-match scoring catches leaks of the planted artefacts. It does not judge harmful content, tone or partial paraphrase of a system prompt.
+- Translations were written for this project. Corrections from native speakers are welcome.
+
+## Related work
+
+Kavach-Eval is a small, practical tool and builds on research that goes much deeper: [IndicJR](https://huggingface.co/papers/2602.16832), a jailbreak-robustness benchmark across Indic languages; the study of [Hinglish and code-mixed jailbreaks](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14226); and [DhvaniGuard](https://huggingface.co/speedsharma/dhvaniguard-v0), an Indic safety classifier. Where those measure models, Kavach-Eval aims to be the thing a team runs on its own assistant before every release.
+
+## Licence
+
+Apache 2.0. Built by [Malaya Kumar Swain](https://github.com/Malaya-kumar-swain). Views and code are my own.

kavach_eval-0.1.0/kavach_eval/__init__.py

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+"""Kavach-Eval: a safe-by-design red-team kit for prompt injection and data leaks in Indian languages."""
+
+from .attacks import CANARY, LANGS, Probe, build_suite
+from .runner import Report, run
+from .scoring import Verdict, normalise, score
+from .targets import (CallableTarget, EnglishKeywordGuard, LayeredGuard, ObedientBot,
+                      OpenAICompatibleTarget, SYSTEM_PROMPT)
+
+__version__ = "0.1.0"
+
+__all__ = ["CANARY", "LANGS", "Probe", "build_suite", "Report", "run", "Verdict", "normalise", "score",
+           "CallableTarget", "EnglishKeywordGuard", "LayeredGuard", "ObedientBot",
+           "OpenAICompatibleTarget", "SYSTEM_PROMPT", "__version__"]

kavach_eval-0.1.0/kavach_eval/__main__.py

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+"""Command line.
+
+  python -m kavach_eval demo
+  python -m kavach_eval run --base-url https://api.openai.com/v1 --model gpt-4o-mini [--out report]
+  python -m kavach_eval list
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import argparse
+import sys
+
+from .attacks import build_suite
+from .runner import run
+from .targets import DEMO_TARGETS, OpenAICompatibleTarget
+
+
+def main(argv=None) -> int:
+    ap = argparse.ArgumentParser(prog="kavach_eval", description="Indic prompt-injection & data-leak red-team kit")
+    sub = ap.add_subparsers(dest="cmd", required=True)
+    sub.add_parser("demo", help="run the suite against the three built-in demo targets")
+    sub.add_parser("list", help="print every probe")
+    r = sub.add_parser("run", help="run against an OpenAI-compatible chat endpoint")
+    r.add_argument("--base-url", required=True)
+    r.add_argument("--model", required=True)
+    r.add_argument("--api-key-env", default="OPENAI_API_KEY")
+    r.add_argument("--delay", type=float, default=0.0, help="seconds to wait before each request, for rate limits")
+    r.add_argument("--out", help="write <out>.md and <out>.json")
+    r.add_argument("--fail-above", type=float, default=None,
+                   help="exit 1 if overall attack success rate is above this (0-1), for CI gates")
+    a = ap.parse_args(argv)
+
+    if a.cmd == "list":
+        for p in build_suite():
+            print(f"{p.id:40} {p.prompt[:90]}")
+        return 0
+    if a.cmd == "demo":
+        for cls in DEMO_TARGETS.values():
+            print(run(cls()).to_markdown(), end="\n\n")
+        return 0
+    rep = run(OpenAICompatibleTarget(a.base_url, a.model, a.api_key_env, delay=a.delay))
+    print(rep.to_markdown())
+    if a.out:
+        open(a.out + ".md", "w", encoding="utf-8").write(rep.to_markdown())
+        open(a.out + ".json", "w", encoding="utf-8").write(rep.to_json())
+    if a.fail_above is not None and (rep.errored or rep.asr() > a.fail_above):
+        return 1
+    return 0
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    sys.exit(main())