hypercube-cascade 1.0.2__tar.gz → 1.0.4__tar.gz

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  Metadata-Version: 2.4
2
2
  Name: hypercube-cascade
3
- Version: 1.0.2
3
+ Version: 1.0.4
4
4
  Summary: Python bindings for HypercubeCascade: frozen etalon transit + frozen reservoir orbit + HypercubeCNN on end state
5
5
  License-Expression: Apache-2.0
6
6
  Classifier: Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable
@@ -81,6 +81,14 @@ little to no architectural engineering is required for the CNN.
81
81
  <a href="https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeEtalon"><strong>HypercubeEtalon</strong></a>
82
82
  &nbsp;·&nbsp;
83
83
  <a href="https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeCascade"><strong>HypercubeCascade</strong></a>
84
+ &nbsp;·&nbsp;
85
+ <a href="https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeLCN"><strong>HypercubeLCN</strong></a>
86
+ </p>
87
+
88
+ <p align="center">
89
+ 📄 Foundational paper:
90
+ <a href="https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeCascade/blob/main/docs/Boolean_hypercubes_as_a_neural_substrate.pdf"><em>Boolean Hypercubes as a Neural Substrate</em></a>
91
+ (D.&nbsp;C.&nbsp;Liptak, 2026)
84
92
  </p>
85
93
 
86
94
  HypercubeCascade is an experiment in the **HypercubeAI** project — our quest to
@@ -199,14 +207,21 @@ techniques on spectra like these, and very likely beats them.
199
207
 
200
208
  ![Held-out validation extract, spectra 581 through 584](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dliptak001/HypercubeCascade/main/examples/RamanBaselineExtraction/extracted_baselines_cascade.png)
201
209
 
202
- ### Etalon sets the bar. Cascade raises it (well, maybe).
210
+ ### Three hosts, one floor
203
211
 
204
212
  The etalon-only sibling
205
213
  ([HypercubeEtalon](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeEtalon))
206
- is this Cascade with the reservoir removed, and on its own it
207
- already does everything described above. With the very same
208
- Exciter and readout configuration, its overlays are
209
- indistinguishable from the ones shown.
214
+ is this Cascade with the reservoir removed. The reservoir-only
215
+ sibling ([HypercubeWTF](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeWTF))
216
+ is this Cascade with the transit removed: the same frozen reservoir
217
+ — same seed, spectral radius, history depth, and pass count — driven
218
+ by the normalized spectrum directly. Each of them, on its own,
219
+ already does everything described above. With the very same readout
220
+ configuration and the same 60-epoch budget, the Etalon scores 4.77
221
+ and WTF 4.76 against the Cascade's 4.82, and all three overlays are
222
+ indistinguishable from the one shown. Three preprocessors that share
223
+ no mechanism — a transit, an orbit, and the two in series — carry
224
+ the same one-layer, one-channel readout to the same floor.
210
225
 
211
226
  Real spectra, however, are not nearly this clean. Low laser power,
212
227
  short integration times, and weak scatterers all put noise on the
@@ -217,11 +232,16 @@ That is what the Cascade's second stage, the Reservoir, is for. On
217
232
  the strength of the MNIST white-noise study
218
233
  ([`examples/mnist/WhiteNoiseFilter.md`](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeCascade/blob/main/examples/mnist/WhiteNoiseFilter.md)),
219
234
  the Cascade is expected to outperform the Etalon alone in that
220
- noise.
235
+ noise — and WTF's own study
236
+ ([`examples/mnist/WhiteNoiseFilter.md`](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeWTF/blob/main/examples/mnist/WhiteNoiseFilter.md))
237
+ found that same reservoir a filter that holds accuracy as the noise
238
+ rises. Whether the transit in front of it adds anything under noise,
239
+ or whether the reservoir is doing all of the filtering, is the open
240
+ question.
221
241
 
222
242
  That is the next experiment.
223
243
 
224
- Side-by-side overlays and both training profiles are in
244
+ Side-by-side overlays and all three training profiles are in
225
245
  [`examples/RamanBaselineExtraction/`](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeCascade/blob/main/examples/RamanBaselineExtraction/README.md).
226
246
 
227
247
  ---
@@ -408,6 +428,7 @@ More notes:
408
428
  - **[HypercubeCNN](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeCNN)** — cube-native conv stack; Cascade’s trainable head.
409
429
  - **[HypercubeESN](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeESN)** — echo-state / reservoir computing on streams.
410
430
  - **[HypercubeHopfield](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeHopfield)** — Hopfield-style dynamics on the cube.
431
+ - **[HypercubeLCN](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeLCN)** — locally connected network on the cube; every weight trained, no frozen stages.
411
432
 
412
433
  ---
413
434
 
@@ -54,6 +54,14 @@ little to no architectural engineering is required for the CNN.
54
54
  <a href="https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeEtalon"><strong>HypercubeEtalon</strong></a>
55
55
  &nbsp;·&nbsp;
56
56
  <a href="https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeCascade"><strong>HypercubeCascade</strong></a>
57
+ &nbsp;·&nbsp;
58
+ <a href="https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeLCN"><strong>HypercubeLCN</strong></a>
59
+ </p>
60
+
61
+ <p align="center">
62
+ 📄 Foundational paper:
63
+ <a href="https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeCascade/blob/main/docs/Boolean_hypercubes_as_a_neural_substrate.pdf"><em>Boolean Hypercubes as a Neural Substrate</em></a>
64
+ (D.&nbsp;C.&nbsp;Liptak, 2026)
57
65
  </p>
58
66
 
59
67
  HypercubeCascade is an experiment in the **HypercubeAI** project — our quest to
@@ -172,14 +180,21 @@ techniques on spectra like these, and very likely beats them.
172
180
 
173
181
  ![Held-out validation extract, spectra 581 through 584](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dliptak001/HypercubeCascade/main/examples/RamanBaselineExtraction/extracted_baselines_cascade.png)
174
182
 
175
- ### Etalon sets the bar. Cascade raises it (well, maybe).
183
+ ### Three hosts, one floor
176
184
 
177
185
  The etalon-only sibling
178
186
  ([HypercubeEtalon](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeEtalon))
179
- is this Cascade with the reservoir removed, and on its own it
180
- already does everything described above. With the very same
181
- Exciter and readout configuration, its overlays are
182
- indistinguishable from the ones shown.
187
+ is this Cascade with the reservoir removed. The reservoir-only
188
+ sibling ([HypercubeWTF](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeWTF))
189
+ is this Cascade with the transit removed: the same frozen reservoir
190
+ — same seed, spectral radius, history depth, and pass count — driven
191
+ by the normalized spectrum directly. Each of them, on its own,
192
+ already does everything described above. With the very same readout
193
+ configuration and the same 60-epoch budget, the Etalon scores 4.77
194
+ and WTF 4.76 against the Cascade's 4.82, and all three overlays are
195
+ indistinguishable from the one shown. Three preprocessors that share
196
+ no mechanism — a transit, an orbit, and the two in series — carry
197
+ the same one-layer, one-channel readout to the same floor.
183
198
 
184
199
  Real spectra, however, are not nearly this clean. Low laser power,
185
200
  short integration times, and weak scatterers all put noise on the
@@ -190,11 +205,16 @@ That is what the Cascade's second stage, the Reservoir, is for. On
190
205
  the strength of the MNIST white-noise study
191
206
  ([`examples/mnist/WhiteNoiseFilter.md`](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeCascade/blob/main/examples/mnist/WhiteNoiseFilter.md)),
192
207
  the Cascade is expected to outperform the Etalon alone in that
193
- noise.
208
+ noise — and WTF's own study
209
+ ([`examples/mnist/WhiteNoiseFilter.md`](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeWTF/blob/main/examples/mnist/WhiteNoiseFilter.md))
210
+ found that same reservoir a filter that holds accuracy as the noise
211
+ rises. Whether the transit in front of it adds anything under noise,
212
+ or whether the reservoir is doing all of the filtering, is the open
213
+ question.
194
214
 
195
215
  That is the next experiment.
196
216
 
197
- Side-by-side overlays and both training profiles are in
217
+ Side-by-side overlays and all three training profiles are in
198
218
  [`examples/RamanBaselineExtraction/`](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeCascade/blob/main/examples/RamanBaselineExtraction/README.md).
199
219
 
200
220
  ---
@@ -381,6 +401,7 @@ More notes:
381
401
  - **[HypercubeCNN](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeCNN)** — cube-native conv stack; Cascade’s trainable head.
382
402
  - **[HypercubeESN](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeESN)** — echo-state / reservoir computing on streams.
383
403
  - **[HypercubeHopfield](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeHopfield)** — Hopfield-style dynamics on the cube.
404
+ - **[HypercubeLCN](https://github.com/dliptak001/HypercubeLCN)** — locally connected network on the cube; every weight trained, no frozen stages.
384
405
 
385
406
  ---
386
407
 
@@ -2,4 +2,4 @@
2
2
  # - pyproject.toml reads this via scikit-build-core dynamic metadata
3
3
  # - hypercube_cascade.__version__ imports it
4
4
  # - bindings.cpp gets the same string at compile time via CMake
5
- __version__ = "1.0.2"
5
+ __version__ = "1.0.4"