frame-analytics 0.2.0__tar.gz
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/LICENSE +202 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/MANIFEST.in +8 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/PKG-INFO +420 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/README.md +384 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/bench/__init__.py +0 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/bench/baselines.py +81 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/bench/bench.py +381 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/bench/bench_fused_ssim.py +162 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/bench/bench_memory.py +542 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/bench/bench_training.py +327 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics/__init__.py +80 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics/_cabi.py +530 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics/backend.py +666 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics/csrc/fa_abi.h +206 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics/csrc/fa_cpu.cpp +943 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics/csrc/fa_cuda.cu +1459 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics/functional.py +1207 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics/modules.py +370 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics/reference.py +318 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics.egg-info/PKG-INFO +420 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics.egg-info/SOURCES.txt +28 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics.egg-info/dependency_links.txt +1 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics.egg-info/requires.txt +14 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/frame_analytics.egg-info/top_level.txt +1 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/pyproject.toml +59 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/setup.cfg +4 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/setup.py +161 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/tests/test_metrics.py +241 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/tests/test_training_metrics.py +538 -0
- frame_analytics-0.2.0/tests/validate.py +210 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
|
|
2
|
+
Apache License
|
|
3
|
+
Version 2.0, January 2004
|
|
4
|
+
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
1. Definitions.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
"License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
|
|
11
|
+
and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
|
|
14
|
+
the copyright owner that is granting the License.
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
"Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
|
|
17
|
+
other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
|
|
18
|
+
control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
|
|
19
|
+
"control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
|
|
20
|
+
direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
|
|
21
|
+
otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
|
|
22
|
+
outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
"You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
|
|
25
|
+
exercising permissions granted by this License.
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
"Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
|
|
28
|
+
including but not limited to software source code, documentation
|
|
29
|
+
source, and configuration files.
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
"Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
|
|
32
|
+
transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
|
|
33
|
+
not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
|
|
34
|
+
and conversions to other media types.
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
"Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
|
|
37
|
+
Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
|
|
38
|
+
copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
|
|
39
|
+
(an example is provided in the Appendix below).
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
"Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
|
|
42
|
+
form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
|
|
43
|
+
editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
|
|
44
|
+
represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
|
|
45
|
+
of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
|
|
46
|
+
separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
|
|
47
|
+
the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
"Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
|
|
50
|
+
the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
|
|
51
|
+
to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
|
|
52
|
+
submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
|
|
53
|
+
or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
|
|
54
|
+
the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
|
|
55
|
+
means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
|
|
56
|
+
to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
|
|
57
|
+
communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
|
|
58
|
+
and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
|
|
59
|
+
Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
|
|
60
|
+
excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
|
|
61
|
+
designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
"Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
|
|
64
|
+
on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
|
|
65
|
+
subsequently incorporated within the Work.
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
|
|
68
|
+
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
|
|
69
|
+
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
|
|
70
|
+
copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
|
|
71
|
+
publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
|
|
72
|
+
Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
|
|
75
|
+
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
|
|
76
|
+
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
|
|
77
|
+
(except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
|
|
78
|
+
use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
|
|
79
|
+
where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
|
|
80
|
+
by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
|
|
81
|
+
Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
|
|
82
|
+
with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
|
|
83
|
+
institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
|
|
84
|
+
cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
|
|
85
|
+
or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
|
|
86
|
+
or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
|
|
87
|
+
granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
|
|
88
|
+
as of the date such litigation is filed.
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
|
|
91
|
+
Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
|
|
92
|
+
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
|
|
93
|
+
meet the following conditions:
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
(a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
|
|
96
|
+
Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
(b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
|
|
99
|
+
stating that You changed the files; and
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
(c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
|
|
102
|
+
that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
|
|
103
|
+
attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
|
|
104
|
+
excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
|
|
105
|
+
the Derivative Works; and
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
(d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
|
|
108
|
+
distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
|
|
109
|
+
include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
|
|
110
|
+
within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
|
|
111
|
+
pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
|
|
112
|
+
of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
|
|
113
|
+
as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
|
|
114
|
+
documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
|
|
115
|
+
within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
|
|
116
|
+
wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
|
|
117
|
+
of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
|
|
118
|
+
do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
|
|
119
|
+
notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
|
|
120
|
+
or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
|
|
121
|
+
that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
|
|
122
|
+
as modifying the License.
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
|
|
125
|
+
may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
|
|
126
|
+
for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
|
|
127
|
+
for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
|
|
128
|
+
reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
|
|
129
|
+
the conditions stated in this License.
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
|
|
132
|
+
any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
|
|
133
|
+
by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
|
|
134
|
+
this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
|
|
135
|
+
Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
|
|
136
|
+
the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
|
|
137
|
+
with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
|
|
140
|
+
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
|
|
141
|
+
except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
|
|
142
|
+
origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
|
|
145
|
+
agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
|
|
146
|
+
Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
147
|
+
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
|
|
148
|
+
implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
|
|
149
|
+
of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
|
|
150
|
+
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
|
|
151
|
+
appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
|
|
152
|
+
risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
|
|
155
|
+
whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
|
|
156
|
+
unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
|
|
157
|
+
negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
|
|
158
|
+
liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
|
|
159
|
+
incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
|
|
160
|
+
result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
|
|
161
|
+
Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
|
|
162
|
+
work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
|
|
163
|
+
other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
|
|
164
|
+
has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
|
|
167
|
+
the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
|
|
168
|
+
and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
|
|
169
|
+
or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
|
|
170
|
+
License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
|
|
171
|
+
on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
|
|
172
|
+
of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
|
|
173
|
+
defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
|
|
174
|
+
incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
|
|
175
|
+
of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
|
|
180
|
+
|
|
181
|
+
To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
|
|
182
|
+
boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
|
|
183
|
+
replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
|
|
184
|
+
the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
|
|
185
|
+
comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
|
|
186
|
+
file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
|
|
187
|
+
same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
|
|
188
|
+
identification within third-party archives.
|
|
189
|
+
|
|
190
|
+
Copyright 2026 Nilas
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
193
|
+
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
194
|
+
You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
197
|
+
|
|
198
|
+
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
199
|
+
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
200
|
+
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
201
|
+
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
202
|
+
limitations under the License.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
include LICENSE README.md
|
|
2
|
+
recursive-include frame_analytics/csrc *.cu *.cpp *.h
|
|
3
|
+
recursive-include tests *.py
|
|
4
|
+
recursive-include bench *.py
|
|
5
|
+
# sdists carry sources only -- the binaries are built per platform in CI and
|
|
6
|
+
# only ever appear in wheels
|
|
7
|
+
prune frame_analytics/lib
|
|
8
|
+
global-exclude __pycache__/* *.py[cod] *.so *.pyd *.dll *.dylib
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Metadata-Version: 2.4
|
|
2
|
+
Name: frame-analytics
|
|
3
|
+
Version: 0.2.0
|
|
4
|
+
Summary: Fast MSE, PSNR and SSIM for PyTorch (CPU + CUDA) at float64-reference accuracy
|
|
5
|
+
Author: Nilas
|
|
6
|
+
License-Expression: Apache-2.0
|
|
7
|
+
Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/NevermindNilas/frame_analytics
|
|
8
|
+
Project-URL: Source, https://github.com/NevermindNilas/frame_analytics
|
|
9
|
+
Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/NevermindNilas/frame_analytics/issues
|
|
10
|
+
Keywords: ssim,psnr,mse,image-quality,video-quality,metrics,pytorch,cuda,perceptual-loss
|
|
11
|
+
Classifier: Development Status :: 4 - Beta
|
|
12
|
+
Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
|
|
13
|
+
Classifier: Intended Audience :: Science/Research
|
|
14
|
+
Classifier: Operating System :: OS Independent
|
|
15
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
|
|
16
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: C++
|
|
17
|
+
Classifier: Environment :: GPU :: NVIDIA CUDA
|
|
18
|
+
Classifier: Topic :: Scientific/Engineering :: Image Processing
|
|
19
|
+
Classifier: Topic :: Multimedia :: Video
|
|
20
|
+
Requires-Python: >=3.9
|
|
21
|
+
Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
|
|
22
|
+
License-File: LICENSE
|
|
23
|
+
Requires-Dist: torch>=2.0
|
|
24
|
+
Requires-Dist: numpy>=1.20
|
|
25
|
+
Provides-Extra: bench
|
|
26
|
+
Requires-Dist: scikit-image; extra == "bench"
|
|
27
|
+
Requires-Dist: opencv-python; extra == "bench"
|
|
28
|
+
Requires-Dist: pytorch-msssim; extra == "bench"
|
|
29
|
+
Requires-Dist: piq; extra == "bench"
|
|
30
|
+
Requires-Dist: torchmetrics; extra == "bench"
|
|
31
|
+
Requires-Dist: kornia; extra == "bench"
|
|
32
|
+
Provides-Extra: test
|
|
33
|
+
Requires-Dist: pytest; extra == "test"
|
|
34
|
+
Requires-Dist: scikit-image; extra == "test"
|
|
35
|
+
Dynamic: license-file
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
# frame_analytics
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
Image and video quality metrics for PyTorch — CPU and CUDA — at float64-reference
|
|
40
|
+
accuracy. Fused kernels for forward and backward, so the same code works as an
|
|
41
|
+
evaluation metric and as a training loss.
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
```bash
|
|
44
|
+
pip install frame-analytics
|
|
45
|
+
```
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
```python
|
|
48
|
+
import torch, frame_analytics as fa
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
a = torch.randint(0, 256, (8, 3, 1080, 1920), dtype=torch.uint8, device="cuda")
|
|
51
|
+
b = torch.randint(0, 256, (8, 3, 1080, 1920), dtype=torch.uint8, device="cuda")
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
fa.mse(a, b)
|
|
54
|
+
fa.psnr(a, b, data_range=255.0)
|
|
55
|
+
fa.ssim(a, b, data_range=255.0) # Wang et al. 2004, exactly
|
|
56
|
+
fa.ms_ssim(a, b, data_range=255.0) # Wang et al. 2003
|
|
57
|
+
fa.gmsd(a, b, data_range=255.0) # Xue et al. 2014
|
|
58
|
+
fa.l1(a, b); fa.charbonnier(a, b); fa.huber(a, b)
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
fa.ssim(a, b, reduction="none") # per-image, (8,)
|
|
61
|
+
fa.ssim(a, b, return_map=True) # (8, 3, 1070, 1910)
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
# the convention the super-resolution literature reports
|
|
64
|
+
fa.psnr(a, b, data_range=255.0, luma="matlab", crop_border=4)
|
|
65
|
+
```
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
Accepts `(H,W)` / `(C,H,W)` / `(N,C,H,W)`, uint8 through float64. uint8 stays
|
|
68
|
+
uint8 into the kernel — 2 bytes/pixel of bandwidth instead of 8.
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## Speed
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
Speedup over each library, across 512²→4K and batch 1→8, RTX 3090 / 16-thread CPU:
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
| | SSIM | MS-SSIM | GMSD | PSNR / MSE |
|
|
75
|
+
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
76
|
+
| pytorch-msssim | 16–22× | 7.5–14× | — | — |
|
|
77
|
+
| kornia | 18–32× | — | — | 2.0–8.5× |
|
|
78
|
+
| torchmetrics | 24–28× | — | — | 4.9–14× |
|
|
79
|
+
| piq | 25–30× | 6.7–20× | 40–50× | 12–37× |
|
|
80
|
+
| scikit-image (CPU) | 21–29× | — | — | 170–920× |
|
|
81
|
+
| OpenCV recipe (CPU) | 6.0–7.6× | — | — | 0.7–7.3× (`cv2.PSNR`) |
|
|
82
|
+
| [fused-ssim](https://github.com/rahul-goel/fused-ssim) (CUDA) | 1.2–1.9× | — | — | — |
|
|
83
|
+
| torch built-ins (L1 / Huber) | — | — | — | 2.4–100× |
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
Selected absolute numbers, RTX 3090, ms/call (lower is better):
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
| CUDA, uint8 in | 512² | 1080p | 1080p ×8 | 4K ×8 |
|
|
88
|
+
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
|
|
89
|
+
| SSIM | 0.024 | 0.085 | 0.651 | 2.642 |
|
|
90
|
+
| PSNR | 0.020 | 0.028 | 0.045 | 0.151 |
|
|
91
|
+
| MS-SSIM | 0.331 | 0.512 | 3.088 | — |
|
|
92
|
+
| GMSD | 0.023 | 0.055 | 0.313 | — |
|
|
93
|
+
| L1 | 0.021 | 0.026 | 0.115 | — |
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
SSIM sustains 25.6 Gpixel/s (~11 700 fps at 1080p). PSNR at 4K ×8 hits 880 GB/s
|
|
96
|
+
— 94% of the card's theoretical bandwidth, the ceiling for anything that must
|
|
97
|
+
read both frames.
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
| CPU, uint8 in, ms/call | 512² | 1080p | 1080p ×8 | 4K ×8 |
|
|
100
|
+
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
|
|
101
|
+
| **PSNR**, 1 channel | **0.008** | **0.015** | **0.102** | **1.41** |
|
|
102
|
+
| `cv2.PSNR`, per frame | 0.006 | 0.049 | 0.740 | 4.24 |
|
|
103
|
+
| kornia | 0.046 | 0.114 | 3.29 | 14.4 |
|
|
104
|
+
| torchmetrics | 0.081 | 0.195 | 5.52 | 22.7 |
|
|
105
|
+
| scikit-image | 1.43 | 11.7 | 93.5 | 381 |
|
|
106
|
+
| | | | | |
|
|
107
|
+
| **L1**, RGB | **0.011** | **0.039** | **1.03** | — |
|
|
108
|
+
| `F.l1_loss` | 0.193 | 3.05 | 30.1 | — |
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
Streaming 1080p RGB via CUDA graphs, host uint8 in, python float out: **931 fps**
|
|
111
|
+
(2 941 fps for resident tensors).
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
Full per-size CPU and CUDA tables: `python bench/bench.py`.
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
### Where it doesn't win
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
- `cv2.PSNR` on one sub-megapixel single-channel frame: 0.006 ms against our
|
|
118
|
+
0.008. Not the kernel — that runs the same 262 144 pixels in 3.8 µs, less than
|
|
119
|
+
`cv2.PSNR` takes for the whole call — but the ~4 µs of Python in front of it,
|
|
120
|
+
which is a fixed cost and so only visible when there is nothing else to pay
|
|
121
|
+
for. One frame bigger, or one channel wider, and it inverts: 3.3× at 1080p,
|
|
122
|
+
7.3× at 1080p ×8.
|
|
123
|
+
- **Without the compiled extension** the portable PyTorch fallback is only ~1.1×
|
|
124
|
+
faster than `pytorch-msssim` and uses *more* memory. The speed claims are
|
|
125
|
+
claims about the kernels; the fallback exists to be correct, not to win.
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
## Memory
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
Peak allocation *above the two input frames*, RTX 3090, 3-channel, MiB per
|
|
130
|
+
call. Nothing here is the frames themselves — those you already have:
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
| CUDA, forward | 1080p | 1080p ×8 | 4K ×8 |
|
|
133
|
+
|---|---:|---:|---:|
|
|
134
|
+
| **SSIM** | **0.02** | **0.19** | **0.75** |
|
|
135
|
+
| pytorch-msssim | 288 | 2253 | 9048 |
|
|
136
|
+
| piq | 336 | 2633 | 10568 |
|
|
137
|
+
| kornia | 360 | 2850 | 11397 |
|
|
138
|
+
| torchmetrics | 550 | 4388 | 17509 |
|
|
139
|
+
| | | | |
|
|
140
|
+
| **MS-SSIM** | **15.5** | **120** | **476** |
|
|
141
|
+
| pytorch-msssim | 288 | 2253 | 9048 |
|
|
142
|
+
| piq | 336 | 2633 | 10568 |
|
|
143
|
+
| | | | |
|
|
144
|
+
| **GMSD** | **0.02** | **0.19** | **0.75** |
|
|
145
|
+
| piq | 72 | 760 | 3040 |
|
|
146
|
+
| | | | |
|
|
147
|
+
| **PSNR / MSE / L1 / Charbonnier** | **0.007** | **0.007** | **0.007** |
|
|
148
|
+
| torchmetrics, kornia, `F.l1_loss` | 48 | 380 | 1520 |
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
A fused kernel has nowhere to put an intermediate. What is left for SSIM and
|
|
151
|
+
GMSD is the per-block partial sums — sized by the tile grid, so 4K ×8 costs
|
|
152
|
+
0.75 MiB where the alternatives cost 9–17 GiB — and for the pixel metrics, the
|
|
153
|
+
output scalar. The libraries above are not doing anything wrong; five or six
|
|
154
|
+
frame-shaped temporaries is what the textbook formulation asks for, and 2253
|
|
155
|
+
MiB at 1080p ×8 is almost exactly 6× the 380 MiB input.
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
MS-SSIM is the one metric that must materialise something: the four
|
|
158
|
+
downsampled copies of both frames. That geometric series sums to a third of a
|
|
159
|
+
frame each, and nothing full-resolution survives — 120 MiB at 1080p ×8, where
|
|
160
|
+
the frame pair itself is 380.
|
|
161
|
+
|
|
162
|
+
The CPU story is the same one. There is no `max_memory_allocated` for host
|
|
163
|
+
memory, so these are peak process footprints, each measured in its own
|
|
164
|
+
interpreter — how much more memory the OS had to hand over, which is the
|
|
165
|
+
number that decides whether the box swaps:
|
|
166
|
+
|
|
167
|
+
| CPU, forward | 1080p | 1080p ×8 |
|
|
168
|
+
|---|---:|---:|
|
|
169
|
+
| **SSIM** | **2.0** | **2.4** |
|
|
170
|
+
| pytorch-msssim | 433 | 2796 |
|
|
171
|
+
| piq | 446 | 3256 |
|
|
172
|
+
| kornia | 457 | 3305 |
|
|
173
|
+
| torchmetrics | 915 | 7026 |
|
|
174
|
+
| | | |
|
|
175
|
+
| **MS-SSIM**, uint8 in | **8.9** | **10.6** |
|
|
176
|
+
| **MS-SSIM**, fp32 in | 16.8 | 127 |
|
|
177
|
+
| pytorch-msssim | 462 | 2898 |
|
|
178
|
+
| piq | 471 | 3256 |
|
|
179
|
+
| | | |
|
|
180
|
+
| **GMSD** | **0.11** | **0.69** |
|
|
181
|
+
| piq | 84 | 793 |
|
|
182
|
+
| | | |
|
|
183
|
+
| **PSNR / MSE / L1** | **<0.01** | **<0.01** |
|
|
184
|
+
| kornia (PSNR) | 3.0 | 190 |
|
|
185
|
+
| torchmetrics, `F.l1_loss` | 27–28 | 380 |
|
|
186
|
+
|
|
187
|
+
The pixel metrics reduce two buffers to a scalar and allocate nothing at all.
|
|
188
|
+
SSIM's 2 MiB does not move when the pixel count goes up 8×, so it is fixed
|
|
189
|
+
working set rather than anything per-pixel. MS-SSIM is cheaper from uint8 than
|
|
190
|
+
from float because the cast is fused into the first pooling step: fed uint8 it
|
|
191
|
+
never materialises a full-resolution float copy of either frame, and only the
|
|
192
|
+
pyramid survives.
|
|
193
|
+
|
|
194
|
+
| CUDA, loss step (fwd + bwd, fp32) | 1080p | 1080p ×8 | 4K ×8 |
|
|
195
|
+
|---|---:|---:|---:|
|
|
196
|
+
| **SSIM** | **94** | **752** | **3022** |
|
|
197
|
+
| pytorch-msssim | 480 | 3763 | 15098 |
|
|
198
|
+
| piq | 456 | 3579 | 14350 |
|
|
199
|
+
| | | | |
|
|
200
|
+
| **MS-SSIM** | **118** | **942** | **3782** |
|
|
201
|
+
| pytorch-msssim | 480 | 3763 | 15098 |
|
|
202
|
+
| piq | 456 | 3579 | 14350 |
|
|
203
|
+
| | | | |
|
|
204
|
+
| **GMSD** | 78 | **616** | **2465** |
|
|
205
|
+
| piq | 72 | 760 | 3040 |
|
|
206
|
+
| | | | |
|
|
207
|
+
| **L1** | **24** | **190** | **760** |
|
|
208
|
+
| `F.l1_loss` | 96 | 760 | 3040 |
|
|
209
|
+
|
|
210
|
+
Every row includes the gradient with respect to the prediction — 24 MiB at
|
|
211
|
+
1080p, 760 at 4K ×8 — which is unavoidable and which every implementation
|
|
212
|
+
pays. For `fa.l1` it is the *entire* figure: the backward writes the gradient
|
|
213
|
+
and allocates nothing else. SSIM costs three more planes on top of it and
|
|
214
|
+
MS-SSIM four, at every size — the fused backward recomputes the local moments
|
|
215
|
+
instead of saving them, while the autograd implementations keep the forward's
|
|
216
|
+
activations, which is where the 15 GiB comes from. GMSD on a single 1080p
|
|
217
|
+
frame is the one row that loses, by 6 MiB.
|
|
218
|
+
|
|
219
|
+
`StreamingMetrics` at 1080p RGB holds **18 MiB** — the two device frames plus
|
|
220
|
+
the CUDA graph's private pool — and allocates **nothing** per frame, whether
|
|
221
|
+
it is scoring one metric or nine.
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
Without the compiled extension the portable path allocates like the rest of
|
|
224
|
+
the field, and slightly worse than the best of it: 2830 MiB for SSIM at
|
|
225
|
+
1080p ×8, and 4.5–4.7 GiB as a loss step depending on what `torch.compile`
|
|
226
|
+
managed to fuse.
|
|
227
|
+
|
|
228
|
+
Full tables: `python bench/bench_memory.py`.
|
|
229
|
+
|
|
230
|
+
## Accuracy
|
|
231
|
+
|
|
232
|
+
Defaults reproduce `ssim_index.m`: 11×11 Gaussian, σ=1.5, K=(0.01, 0.03),
|
|
233
|
+
`valid` support. Every kernel is gated against a float64 transcription of the
|
|
234
|
+
paper (`python tests/validate.py`).
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
236
|
+
| implementation | SSIM abs. error |
|
|
237
|
+
|---|---:|
|
|
238
|
+
| **frame_analytics** (CUDA / CPU / portable) | **2.4e-09 / 3.1e-09 / 6.9e-09** |
|
|
239
|
+
| pytorch-msssim | 1.0e-07 |
|
|
240
|
+
| fused-ssim (`padding="valid"`) | 3.3e-06 |
|
|
241
|
+
| kornia | 2.1e-05 |
|
|
242
|
+
| torchmetrics | 2.2e-05 |
|
|
243
|
+
| scikit-image (defaults) | 1.1e-03 |
|
|
244
|
+
| fused-ssim (`padding="same"`, its default) | 3.0e-03 |
|
|
245
|
+
| piq (defaults) | 8.8e-03 |
|
|
246
|
+
|
|
247
|
+
The bottom entries aren't bugs — different windows, MATLAB-style downsampling,
|
|
248
|
+
zero padding. Defensible defaults, different metric.
|
|
249
|
+
|
|
250
|
+
MSE and PSNR match float64 numpy exactly; the accumulator is float64 even when
|
|
251
|
+
the elementwise work is float32 (a 4K frame has 8.3M residuals, and summing
|
|
252
|
+
those in float32 loses ~4 significant digits straight into the dB figure).
|
|
253
|
+
|
|
254
|
+
Worst abs. error vs float64 reference, over CPU and CUDA, native and portable:
|
|
255
|
+
|
|
256
|
+
| metric | error |
|
|
257
|
+
|---|---:|
|
|
258
|
+
| MS-SSIM | 3.7e-08 |
|
|
259
|
+
| GMSD | 2.8e-09 |
|
|
260
|
+
| L1, Huber (uint8) | 8.9e-16 — exact, integer accumulator |
|
|
261
|
+
| Charbonnier | 1.3e-07 |
|
|
262
|
+
|
|
263
|
+
GMSD's similarity map is float32, so deviations below ~1e-7 measure rounding,
|
|
264
|
+
not the images (`gmsd(x, x)` ≈ 3e-08, not 0). A typical GMSD is ~0.03.
|
|
265
|
+
|
|
266
|
+
## Training
|
|
267
|
+
|
|
268
|
+
Every metric is differentiable, and the SSIM family has a fused CUDA backward
|
|
269
|
+
rather than autograd over the portable path — which is where the memory goes:
|
|
270
|
+
|
|
271
|
+
```python
|
|
272
|
+
crit_ms = fa.MSSSIM(data_range=1.0)
|
|
273
|
+
crit_l1 = fa.L1()
|
|
274
|
+
loss = 0.84 * crit_ms.loss(pred, target) + 0.16 * crit_l1(pred, target)
|
|
275
|
+
loss.backward()
|
|
276
|
+
```
|
|
277
|
+
|
|
278
|
+
That mix is Zhao et al., *Loss Functions for Image Restoration with Neural
|
|
279
|
+
Networks* (2016) — the reason MS-SSIM is here at all.
|
|
280
|
+
|
|
281
|
+
MS-SSIM loss step, 1080p ×8, float32 RGB: **12.7 ms / 942 MiB** against
|
|
282
|
+
pytorch-msssim's 81.3 ms / 3763 MiB — **6.4× faster on 4.0× less memory**. The
|
|
283
|
+
fused backward recomputes the local moments instead of storing them, so nothing
|
|
284
|
+
full-resolution survives the forward pass at any of the five scales. Both
|
|
285
|
+
figures include the 190 MiB gradient neither implementation can avoid; see
|
|
286
|
+
[Memory](#memory).
|
|
287
|
+
|
|
288
|
+
Gradients are verified two independent ways — against autograd over the portable
|
|
289
|
+
path, and against central differences on the float64 reference forward — both to
|
|
290
|
+
~1e-6 relative. The scalar-reduction backward issues no device→host sync, so it
|
|
291
|
+
does not stall the training pipeline.
|
|
292
|
+
|
|
293
|
+
Caveats:
|
|
294
|
+
|
|
295
|
+
- `GMSD.loss()` returns `1 − mean(GMS)`, not the deviation. `d√var/dvar` is
|
|
296
|
+
unbounded as the variance goes to zero, which is exactly where a converging
|
|
297
|
+
model lives; the mean is the well-behaved objective from the same map.
|
|
298
|
+
`fa.gmsd()` still gives you the published metric.
|
|
299
|
+
- MS-SSIM's per-scale factors are clamped at zero, so on anti-correlated content
|
|
300
|
+
the value **and its gradient** are exactly zero. Standard formulation, every
|
|
301
|
+
implementation clamps — but MS-SSIM alone cannot pull a diverged model back.
|
|
302
|
+
The L1 term above removes the dead zone.
|
|
303
|
+
- The native backward is CUDA + float32 only; CPU, float64, uint8 and
|
|
304
|
+
`downsample=True` fall back to autograd over the portable path.
|
|
305
|
+
- The fused backward is a kernel, not a graph, so `create_graph=True` (gradient
|
|
306
|
+
penalties, HVPs, `torch.func.hessian`) raises rather than silently returning
|
|
307
|
+
zeros. For a second derivative use `backend_hint="torch"` with
|
|
308
|
+
`fa.set_compile_enabled(False)`.
|
|
309
|
+
|
|
310
|
+
## Reporting conventions
|
|
311
|
+
|
|
312
|
+
`luma=` and `crop_border=` are on every metric. Nearly every super-resolution
|
|
313
|
+
and restoration paper reports PSNR/SSIM on the luma plane of a border-cropped
|
|
314
|
+
frame, so a library without them produces right-looking numbers that quietly
|
|
315
|
+
disagree with the literature.
|
|
316
|
+
|
|
317
|
+
```python
|
|
318
|
+
fa.psnr(a, b, data_range=255.0, luma="matlab", crop_border=scale) # Y-PSNR
|
|
319
|
+
fa.ssim(a, b, data_range=255.0, luma="matlab", crop_border=scale) # Y-SSIM
|
|
320
|
+
```
|
|
321
|
+
|
|
322
|
+
`"matlab"` is the studio-range Y′ of MATLAB's `rgb2ycbcr`, i.e. what BasicSR's
|
|
323
|
+
`test_y_channel=True` computes. `"bt601"` and `"bt709"` are the full-range
|
|
324
|
+
definitions. The crop is a view, so it costs nothing.
|
|
325
|
+
|
|
326
|
+
## Install
|
|
327
|
+
|
|
328
|
+
```bash
|
|
329
|
+
pip install frame-analytics
|
|
330
|
+
```
|
|
331
|
+
|
|
332
|
+
torch ≥ 2.0, numpy. The kernels arrive **precompiled**, one wheel per platform
|
|
333
|
+
and no version matrix — the same wheel works on every Python and every torch
|
|
334
|
+
build.
|
|
335
|
+
|
|
336
|
+
That is not the usual arrangement, because the usual arrangement cannot be
|
|
337
|
+
published. A torch C++ extension is ABI-locked to the exact {python} × {torch} ×
|
|
338
|
+
{CUDA} it was compiled against, and a wheel filename has nowhere to record
|
|
339
|
+
"torch 2.6": pip would match on Python and platform alone and hand you an
|
|
340
|
+
`undefined symbol` ImportError. So the kernels sit behind a plain C ABI instead
|
|
341
|
+
— raw pointers, an int dtype code, a stream handle, int return codes — and the
|
|
342
|
+
binaries link neither libtorch nor libpython. On Windows they import exactly one
|
|
343
|
+
library, `KERNEL32.dll`; on Linux, glibc. An NVIDIA driver at runtime is the
|
|
344
|
+
only external requirement, and only for the CUDA half.
|
|
345
|
+
|
|
346
|
+
Install on a platform with no wheel and the sources — which ship too — compile
|
|
347
|
+
on first call (~1 min, cached thereafter). No compiler at all and every native
|
|
348
|
+
kernel still has a portable PyTorch fallback returning the same numbers.
|
|
349
|
+
`fa.backend_status()` reports which tier is live and where its binary came from;
|
|
350
|
+
`backend_hint="torch"` / `"native"` forces either. On Windows the MSVC build
|
|
351
|
+
environment is located automatically.
|
|
352
|
+
|
|
353
|
+
To compile from source at install time instead:
|
|
354
|
+
|
|
355
|
+
```bash
|
|
356
|
+
FA_BUILD_EXT=1 FA_CUDA_ARCHS="8.6 9.0+PTX" pip install frame-analytics
|
|
357
|
+
```
|
|
358
|
+
|
|
359
|
+
From a checkout:
|
|
360
|
+
|
|
361
|
+
```bash
|
|
362
|
+
pip install -e .
|
|
363
|
+
python tests/validate.py # accuracy gate
|
|
364
|
+
python bench/bench.py # speed + accuracy tables
|
|
365
|
+
python bench/bench_training.py # MS-SSIM / GMSD / pixel losses
|
|
366
|
+
python bench/bench_memory.py # peak memory, forward and loss step
|
|
367
|
+
python bench/bench_fused_ssim.py # head-to-head vs fused-ssim
|
|
368
|
+
```
|
|
369
|
+
|
|
370
|
+
## API
|
|
371
|
+
|
|
372
|
+
Every metric takes `reduction` (`"mean"` → scalar, `"none"` → per-image `(N,)`),
|
|
373
|
+
`dtype`, `luma`, `crop_border` and — where there is a kernel — `backend_hint`.
|
|
374
|
+
|
|
375
|
+
```python
|
|
376
|
+
mse (x, y, *, reduction="mean", dtype=None, out_dtype=torch.float64,
|
|
377
|
+
luma=None, crop_border=0)
|
|
378
|
+
psnr (x, y, *, data_range=None, eps=0.0, ...)
|
|
379
|
+
ssim (x, y, *, data_range=None, win_size=11, sigma=1.5, K=(0.01, 0.03),
|
|
380
|
+
return_map=False, downsample=False, backend_hint="auto", ...)
|
|
381
|
+
ms_ssim (x, y, *, data_range=None, win_size=11, sigma=1.5, K=(0.01, 0.03),
|
|
382
|
+
weights=MS_SSIM_WEIGHTS, backend_hint="auto", ...)
|
|
383
|
+
gmsd (x, y, *, data_range=None, T=None, eps=None, downsample=True,
|
|
384
|
+
return_map=False, backend_hint="auto", ...)
|
|
385
|
+
gms (x, y, ...) # mean of the same map
|
|
386
|
+
l1 (x, y, ...)
|
|
387
|
+
charbonnier(x, y, *, eps=1e-3, ...) # mean sqrt(d^2 + eps^2)
|
|
388
|
+
huber (x, y, *, delta=1.0, ...) # matches torch.nn.HuberLoss
|
|
389
|
+
rgb_to_luma(t, mode="bt601", *, data_range=None, dtype=None)
|
|
390
|
+
```
|
|
391
|
+
|
|
392
|
+
`data_range` defaults to 255 for integer input, 1.0 for float. `downsample=True`
|
|
393
|
+
on `ssim` applies MATLAB `ssim.m`'s automatic box-downsample (off by default, as
|
|
394
|
+
in `ssim_index.m` and every PyTorch library); on `gmsd` it is the paper's 2×
|
|
395
|
+
prefilter and is *on* by default.
|
|
396
|
+
|
|
397
|
+
Module forms `MSE`, `PSNR`, `SSIM`, `MSSSIM`, `GMSD`, `L1`, `Charbonnier`,
|
|
398
|
+
`Huber` cache what they can and expose `.loss()`:
|
|
399
|
+
|
|
400
|
+
```python
|
|
401
|
+
crit = fa.SSIM(data_range=1.0)
|
|
402
|
+
loss = crit.loss(pred, target) # 1 - SSIM, fused backward on CUDA float32
|
|
403
|
+
loss.backward()
|
|
404
|
+
|
|
405
|
+
sm = fa.StreamingMetrics((1, 3, 1080, 1920), device="cuda", dtype=torch.uint8,
|
|
406
|
+
metrics=("psnr", "ssim", "ms_ssim", "gmsd"))
|
|
407
|
+
for ref, dist in frames:
|
|
408
|
+
out = sm.update(ref, dist) # one graph replay, all four metrics
|
|
409
|
+
```
|
|
410
|
+
|
|
411
|
+
`StreamingMetrics` accepts any of `mse`, `psnr`, `ssim`, `ms_ssim`, `gmsd`,
|
|
412
|
+
`gms`, `l1`, `charbonnier`, `huber`; they all capture into the same CUDA graph,
|
|
413
|
+
so scoring a frame on nine metrics is still one replay.
|
|
414
|
+
|
|
415
|
+
## License
|
|
416
|
+
|
|
417
|
+
Apache 2.0.
|
|
418
|
+
|
|
419
|
+
Wang, Bovik, Sheikh, Simoncelli. *Image Quality Assessment: From Error
|
|
420
|
+
Visibility to Structural Similarity.* IEEE TIP 13(4), 2004.
|