fpf-thinking-map 1.9.4__tar.gz → 2.0.0__tar.gz

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (25) hide show
  1. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/LICENSE +1 -1
  2. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/NOTICE +3 -3
  3. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/PKG-INFO +110 -49
  4. fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4/fpf_thinking_map.egg-info/PKG-INFO → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0/README.md +96 -71
  5. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/__init__.py +75 -55
  6. fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0/fpf_thinking_map/agentic_structure.py +331 -0
  7. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/examples.py +32 -9
  8. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/guards.py +63 -5
  9. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/logic.py +92 -10
  10. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/primitives.py +139 -32
  11. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/reachability.py +92 -1
  12. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/state.py +352 -22
  13. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/traversal.py +210 -10
  14. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/verify.py +749 -31
  15. fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0/fpf_thinking_map.egg-info/PKG-INFO +431 -0
  16. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map.egg-info/SOURCES.txt +1 -0
  17. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/pyproject.toml +14 -14
  18. fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4/README.md +0 -334
  19. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/authorization.py +0 -0
  20. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/move_intent.py +0 -0
  21. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/pending_input.py +0 -0
  22. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map/py.typed +0 -0
  23. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map.egg-info/dependency_links.txt +0 -0
  24. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/fpf_thinking_map.egg-info/top_level.txt +0 -0
  25. {fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/setup.cfg +0 -0
{fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/LICENSE RENAMED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  MIT License
2
2
 
3
- Copyright (c) 2026 igareosh.com <igareosh@igareosh.com> (@igareosh on GitHub and Telegram)
3
+ Copyright (c) 2026 CONSOLIDARE CONTINUUM S.R.L. <info@consolidare-continuum.com>
4
4
 
5
5
  Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
6
6
  of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
{fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/NOTICE RENAMED
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
1
1
  FPF Thinking Map
2
2
  ================
3
3
 
4
- Copyright (c) 2026 igareosh.com <igareosh@igareosh.com>
5
- GitHub / Telegram: @igareosh
6
- Website: https://igareosh.com
4
+ Copyright (c) 2026 CONSOLIDARE CONTINUUM S.R.L. <info@consolidare-continuum.com>
5
+ GitHub: @Consolidare-Continuum · maintainer contact: @igareosh
6
+ Website: https://consolidare-continuum.com
7
7
 
8
8
  This is a small MIT-licensed community implementation: free to use,
9
9
  open to inspect, and published as a working contribution rather than a
{fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4 → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0}/PKG-INFO RENAMED
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
1
1
  Metadata-Version: 2.4
2
2
  Name: fpf-thinking-map
3
- Version: 1.9.4
3
+ Version: 2.0.0
4
4
  Summary: Deterministic Python runtime for lawful agent traversal with explicit state, evidence, authorization, waiting, and move identity.
5
- Author-email: "igareosh.com (@igareosh)" <igareosh@igareosh.com>
6
- Maintainer-email: "igareosh.com (@igareosh)" <igareosh@igareosh.com>
5
+ Author-email: "CONSOLIDARE CONTINUUM S.R.L." <info@consolidare-continuum.com>
6
+ Maintainer-email: "CONSOLIDARE CONTINUUM S.R.L." <info@consolidare-continuum.com>
7
7
  License-Expression: MIT
8
- Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map
9
- Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map
10
- Project-URL: Documentation, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map#readme
11
- Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/issues
12
- Project-URL: Architecture, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/ARCHITECTURE.md
13
- Project-URL: Changelog, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
14
- Project-URL: Contributing, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
15
- Project-URL: Advisories, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md
16
- Project-URL: Website, https://igareosh.com
17
- Project-URL: GitHub, https://github.com/igareosh
8
+ Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map
9
+ Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map
10
+ Project-URL: Documentation, https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map#readme
11
+ Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/issues
12
+ Project-URL: Architecture, https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/ARCHITECTURE.md
13
+ Project-URL: Changelog, https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
14
+ Project-URL: Contributing, https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
15
+ Project-URL: Advisories, https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md
16
+ Project-URL: Website, https://consolidare-continuum.com
17
+ Project-URL: GitHub, https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum
18
18
  Project-URL: Telegram, https://t.me/igareosh
19
- Project-URL: Demo, https://igareosh.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html
19
+ Project-URL: Demo, https://consolidare-continuum.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html
20
20
  Keywords: agentic,thinking-map,llm,reasoning,propositional-logic,evidence-decay,ttl,guards,gates,semantic-map,fpf,human-in-the-loop,ignition-lock,hitl,safety,authorization,await,move-intent,workflow
21
21
  Classifier: Development Status :: 4 - Beta
22
22
  Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ License-File: NOTICE
35
35
  Dynamic: license-file
36
36
 
37
37
  <p align="center">
38
- <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/main/docs/assets/fpf-agentic-thinking-map-header.png" alt="FPF Agentic Thinking Map - Agent freedom. Explicit movement rules." width="100%" />
38
+ <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/main/docs/assets/fpf-agentic-thinking-map-header-v20260818.png" alt="FPF Agentic Thinking Map - Agent freedom. Explicit movement rules." width="100%" />
39
39
  </p>
40
40
 
41
41
  # FPF Agentic Thinking Map
@@ -49,12 +49,12 @@ context. The model can inspect the map and choose; the runtime decides whether
49
49
  the move is valid.
50
50
 
51
51
  [![PyPI](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/fpf-thinking-map?style=flat-square&label=PyPI&color=3775A9)](https://pypi.org/project/fpf-thinking-map/)
52
- [![Downloads (honest)](https://img.shields.io/badge/downloads%20%28honest%29-4k-1f6feb?style=flat-square)](https://pypistats.org/packages/fpf-thinking-map)
53
- [![Python](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/fpf-thinking-map?style=flat-square&label=Python&color=f0b429)](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/pyproject.toml)
54
- [![License](https://img.shields.io/pypi/l/fpf-thinking-map?style=flat-square&label=license&color=57c7bd)](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/LICENSE)
55
- [![Zero dependencies](https://img.shields.io/badge/dependencies-0-ff9f43?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/pyproject.toml)
56
- [![Verification](https://img.shields.io/badge/verify-26%2F26-59d18c?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/fpf_thinking_map/verify.py)
57
- [![Live demo](https://img.shields.io/badge/live-demo-dd8cff?style=flat-square)](https://igareosh.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html)
52
+ [![Downloads (honest)](https://img.shields.io/badge/downloads%20%28honest%29-4.5k-1f6feb?style=flat-square)](https://pypistats.org/packages/fpf-thinking-map)
53
+ [![Python](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/fpf-thinking-map?style=flat-square&label=Python&color=f0b429)](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/pyproject.toml)
54
+ [![License](https://img.shields.io/pypi/l/fpf-thinking-map?style=flat-square&label=license&color=57c7bd)](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/LICENSE)
55
+ [![Zero dependencies](https://img.shields.io/badge/dependencies-0-ff9f43?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/pyproject.toml)
56
+ [![Verification](https://img.shields.io/badge/verify-35%2F35-59d18c?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/fpf_thinking_map/verify.py)
57
+ [![Live demo](https://img.shields.io/badge/live-demo-dd8cff?style=flat-square)](https://consolidare-continuum.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html)
58
58
 
59
59
  ```bash
60
60
  pip install fpf-thinking-map
@@ -63,13 +63,13 @@ python -m fpf_thinking_map.verify
63
63
 
64
64
  ## Important links
65
65
 
66
- - [ARCHITECTURE.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/ARCHITECTURE.md)
67
- - [VERSION_TRACKER.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md)
68
- - [TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md)
69
- - [REFLECTIONS.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/REFLECTIONS.md)
70
- - [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
71
- - [ADVISORIES.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md)
72
- - [`dev_mcp/`](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/tree/main/dev_mcp)
66
+ - [ARCHITECTURE.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/ARCHITECTURE.md)
67
+ - [VERSION_TRACKER.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md)
68
+ - [TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md)
69
+ - [REFLECTIONS.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/REFLECTIONS.md)
70
+ - [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
71
+ - [ADVISORIES.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md)
72
+ - [`dev_mcp/`](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/tree/main/dev_mcp)
73
73
 
74
74
  The `dev_mcp` development and compliance harness is genuinely tested against
75
75
  the package and updated whenever runtime behavior, compliance checks, or
@@ -90,11 +90,31 @@ into ordinary code:
90
90
  - cross-context bridges;
91
91
  - human authorization;
92
92
  - external dependencies and wake conditions;
93
- - concrete move identity and trace lineage.
93
+ - concrete move identity and trace lineage;
94
+ - typed claim scope and pathwise assurance;
95
+ - tool-call plan closure and hard autonomy budgets.
94
96
 
95
97
  This is not another reasoning prompt. It is a compact control surface around
96
98
  reasoning.
97
99
 
100
+ ## Why this works across model sizes
101
+
102
+ The map clips interpretive slack at both ends. Strong models stop
103
+ free-associating past what a constraint actually says; lighter models receive
104
+ enough scaffolding that they do not have to infer the workflow's intent from
105
+ scratch.
106
+
107
+ Building a good map still requires real judgment, so new controls should be
108
+ designed and challenged with strong models first. Consuming the finished map
109
+ does not require the same reasoning capacity. Once a workflow is encoded as
110
+ explicit constraints and gates instead of tacit prose, following it correctly
111
+ stops depending on frontier-level inference. A lighter model does not have to
112
+ understand the workflow deeply; it has to respect the map.
113
+
114
+ That is what makes the result portable down to smaller models, not merely
115
+ across flagship ones: the hard reasoning was front-loaded into the encoding,
116
+ once, by the map author.
117
+
98
118
  ## The contract
99
119
 
100
120
  The division of responsibility is deliberate:
@@ -112,15 +132,28 @@ The division of responsibility is deliberate:
112
132
  The map constrains movement, not meaning. It does not replace the model,
113
133
  application logic, retrieval, tools, or a task scheduler.
114
134
 
135
+ ## Structural agentic controls
136
+
137
+ | Concern | Runtime structure | Enforced effect |
138
+ | --- | --- | --- |
139
+ | Claim applicability and assurance | `ContextSlice`, `ClaimScope`, `FormalityLevel`, `ReliabilityPath` | Numeric G is no longer treated as scope; unknown membership stays unknown; R folds pathwise |
140
+ | Tool-call planning | `CallPlanPrimitive`, `BudgetEnvelope`, `CheckpointReturn` | Incomplete or mismatched declared tool plans return `REVISE_PLAN` and cannot fire |
141
+ | Autonomous enactment | `AutonomyBudgetDecl`, `AutonomyLedgerEntry` | A transition opts in with `requires_autonomy_budget_id`; failed assignment/gate/envelope returns `ESCALATE` and successful burn is recorded |
142
+ | Performed-work attribution | `WorkPrimitive.performed_under`, `validate_work_attribution()` | Once a map declares RoleAssignments, a dangling or wrong-holder work record cannot satisfy completion |
143
+ | Gate decisions | `GateDecision`, `GateCheck.failure_decision`, `OutcomeCause` | `ABSTAIN` means the gate lacks enough basis to say yes; an explicit `BLOCK` means policy says no for the current evaluation. Traversal preserves the distinction as `cause=gate_block` without breaking the existing outcome enum |
144
+ | Map integrity | `ThinkingMapTraversal.validate_map()` | Opt-in preflight fails on dangling gate/rule references; explicit unknown transition IDs return typed `ABSTAIN` |
145
+
146
+ These are bounded runtime compilations, not a port of the full FPF framework.
147
+
115
148
  ## Live runtime visual
116
149
 
117
- [![Three test-backed traces of the traversal runtime](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/main/docs/assets/three-runs-preview.png)](https://igareosh.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html)
150
+ [![Four test-backed traces of the traversal runtime](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/main/docs/assets/three-runs-preview.png)](https://consolidare-continuum.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html)
118
151
 
119
- **[Open the interactive three-run trace](https://igareosh.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html)**
152
+ **[Open the interactive four-run trace](https://consolidare-continuum.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html)**
120
153
 
121
154
  The visual follows evidence recovery, `PendingInput`/`AWAIT`, `MoveIntent`,
122
- state-bound authorization, and successful traced movement in the current
123
- runtime.
155
+ state-bound authorization, and the v1.9.5 distinction between an undecided
156
+ gate (`ABSTAIN`) and an explicit hard denial (`BLOCK`).
124
157
 
125
158
  ## Minimal example
126
159
 
@@ -160,6 +193,7 @@ semantic_map.register_transition(
160
193
  "deploy",
161
194
  "candidate",
162
195
  "released",
196
+ required_gate_id="release_gate",
163
197
  required_evidence=["test_results"],
164
198
  )
165
199
  )
@@ -211,6 +245,19 @@ Gates test declared conditions. Guards enforce hard constraints. A small
211
245
  propositional layer composes facts without asking the model to reinterpret the
212
246
  rules on every step.
213
247
 
248
+ When a gate cannot return `PASS`, v1.9.5 keeps two different situations apart:
249
+
250
+ | Gate result | Plain-language meaning | Typical traversal response |
251
+ | --- | --- | --- |
252
+ | `ABSTAIN` (`"insufficient"`) | The gate does not have enough basis to say yes | `COLLECT_EVIDENCE` when the missing evidence is declared; otherwise a denied outcome |
253
+ | `BLOCK` | A check explicitly says no under the current declared policy and state | denied with `cause=OutcomeCause.GATE_BLOCK` |
254
+
255
+ `BLOCK` is hard for that evaluation, not necessarily permanent. It must not be
256
+ downgraded by another check or treated as an invitation to guess, but the gate
257
+ may evaluate differently after its declared evidence, state, or policy changes.
258
+ Existing checks do not become hard blocks automatically; a check opts in with
259
+ `failure_decision=GateDecision.BLOCK`.
260
+
214
261
  ### Validated bridges
215
262
 
216
263
  Cross-context movement is explicit. High-risk substitution without a
@@ -260,13 +307,14 @@ by expanding into a general agent framework.
260
307
  | v1.7 | State-bound, expiring authorization receipts |
261
308
  | v1.8 | External dependency tracking and `AWAIT` |
262
309
  | v1.9 | Concrete move identity, inspection, lineage, authorization-clock fix |
310
+ | v1.9.5 "Ground Stop" | Correct A.21 gate join; explicit `BLOCK` versus insufficient `ABSTAIN`; typed denial causes; opt-in structural controls |
263
311
 
264
312
  The complete reader-facing history is in
265
- [docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md).
313
+ [docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md).
266
314
  Technical changes are in
267
- [CHANGELOG.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md),
315
+ [CHANGELOG.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md),
268
316
  and full release bodies remain in
269
- [GitHub Releases](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/releases).
317
+ [GitHub Releases](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/releases).
270
318
 
271
319
  This separation is intentional: the README describes the stable product; the
272
320
  tracker records how that product became stronger.
@@ -287,15 +335,28 @@ python -m fpf_thinking_map.verify
287
335
  python -m fpf_thinking_map.examples
288
336
  ```
289
337
 
338
+ The 1.9.5 gate distinction was also replayed through `dev_mcp` with the same
339
+ missing `release_permit` under two policies:
340
+
341
+ ```text
342
+ default check -> gate: insufficient -> outcome: collect_evidence
343
+ explicit BLOCK -> gate: block -> outcome: denied (cause: gate_block)
344
+ permit present -> gate: pass -> outcome: continue
345
+ ```
346
+
347
+ That is the release contract in one view: uncertainty requests a resolution
348
+ path; a declared hard denial stops the move and remains identifiable to the
349
+ caller.
350
+
290
351
  The compiled state slice was also measured against injecting the corresponding
291
352
  raw FPF sections at five shipped decision points. The measured slice was much
292
353
  smaller, but this is a traversal-context result, not a claim about general
293
354
  intelligence or total application cost. Method and limitations:
294
- [TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md).
355
+ [TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md).
295
356
 
296
357
  For the authorization experiments, threat boundaries, failures found, and
297
358
  claims deliberately not made, see
298
- [IGNITION_LOCK_WIND_TUNNEL.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/IGNITION_LOCK_WIND_TUNNEL.md).
359
+ [IGNITION_LOCK_WIND_TUNNEL.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/IGNITION_LOCK_WIND_TUNNEL.md).
299
360
 
300
361
  ## Scope
301
362
 
@@ -320,19 +381,19 @@ Do not use it as:
320
381
 
321
382
  Correct map authoring and correct host integration remain part of the trust
322
383
  boundary. Known sharp edges and deliberate non-goals are recorded in
323
- [ADVISORIES.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md).
384
+ [ADVISORIES.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md).
324
385
 
325
386
  ## Repository guide
326
387
 
327
388
  | Path | Purpose |
328
389
  | --- | --- |
329
- | [`fpf_thinking_map/`](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/tree/main/fpf_thinking_map) | Zero-dependency runtime published to PyPI |
330
- | [`dev_mcp/`](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/tree/main/dev_mcp) | Separate development and compliance-testing harness |
331
- | [ARCHITECTURE.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/ARCHITECTURE.md) | Verified control flow and module architecture |
332
- | [docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md) | Every release, with three practical consequences |
333
- | [docs/DECISIONS_REJECTIONS_ADOPTIONS.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/DECISIONS_REJECTIONS_ADOPTIONS.md) | Design provenance and rejected scope |
334
- | [docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md) | Integration boundaries and known sharp edges |
335
- | [SHA256SUMS](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/SHA256SUMS) | Repository-wide source fingerprints |
390
+ | [`fpf_thinking_map/`](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/tree/main/fpf_thinking_map) | Zero-dependency runtime published to PyPI |
391
+ | [`dev_mcp/`](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/tree/main/dev_mcp) | Separate development and compliance-testing harness |
392
+ | [ARCHITECTURE.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/ARCHITECTURE.md) | Verified control flow and module architecture |
393
+ | [docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md) | Every release, with three practical consequences |
394
+ | [docs/DECISIONS_REJECTIONS_ADOPTIONS.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/DECISIONS_REJECTIONS_ADOPTIONS.md) | Design provenance and rejected scope |
395
+ | [docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md) | Integration boundaries and known sharp edges |
396
+ | [SHA256SUMS](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/SHA256SUMS) | Repository-wide source fingerprints |
336
397
 
337
398
  ## Design rules
338
399
 
@@ -354,14 +415,14 @@ FPF provides the broad conceptual frame. This package compiles a selected part
354
415
  of that frame into a practical traversal runtime. It may omit or reject
355
416
  patterns that do not improve this package's observable agent behavior.
356
417
 
357
- See [NOTICE](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/NOTICE)
358
- and [SOURCES.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/SOURCES.md)
418
+ See [NOTICE](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/NOTICE)
419
+ and [SOURCES.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/SOURCES.md)
359
420
  for attribution and scope boundaries.
360
421
 
361
422
  ## License and contact
362
423
 
363
424
  MIT License. See
364
- [LICENSE](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/LICENSE).
425
+ [LICENSE](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/LICENSE).
365
426
 
366
427
  Maintained by [igareosh.com](https://igareosh.com) ·
367
428
  [@igareosh](https://github.com/igareosh) ·
fpf_thinking_map-1.9.4/fpf_thinking_map.egg-info/PKG-INFO → fpf_thinking_map-2.0.0/README.md RENAMED
@@ -1,41 +1,5 @@
1
- Metadata-Version: 2.4
2
- Name: fpf-thinking-map
3
- Version: 1.9.4
4
- Summary: Deterministic Python runtime for lawful agent traversal with explicit state, evidence, authorization, waiting, and move identity.
5
- Author-email: "igareosh.com (@igareosh)" <igareosh@igareosh.com>
6
- Maintainer-email: "igareosh.com (@igareosh)" <igareosh@igareosh.com>
7
- License-Expression: MIT
8
- Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map
9
- Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map
10
- Project-URL: Documentation, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map#readme
11
- Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/issues
12
- Project-URL: Architecture, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/ARCHITECTURE.md
13
- Project-URL: Changelog, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
14
- Project-URL: Contributing, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
15
- Project-URL: Advisories, https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md
16
- Project-URL: Website, https://igareosh.com
17
- Project-URL: GitHub, https://github.com/igareosh
18
- Project-URL: Telegram, https://t.me/igareosh
19
- Project-URL: Demo, https://igareosh.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html
20
- Keywords: agentic,thinking-map,llm,reasoning,propositional-logic,evidence-decay,ttl,guards,gates,semantic-map,fpf,human-in-the-loop,ignition-lock,hitl,safety,authorization,await,move-intent,workflow
21
- Classifier: Development Status :: 4 - Beta
22
- Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
23
- Classifier: Intended Audience :: Science/Research
24
- Classifier: Operating System :: OS Independent
25
- Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
26
- Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
27
- Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.13
28
- Classifier: Topic :: Scientific/Engineering :: Artificial Intelligence
29
- Classifier: Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python Modules
30
- Classifier: Typing :: Typed
31
- Requires-Python: >=3.12
32
- Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
33
- License-File: LICENSE
34
- License-File: NOTICE
35
- Dynamic: license-file
36
-
37
1
  <p align="center">
38
- <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/main/docs/assets/fpf-agentic-thinking-map-header.png" alt="FPF Agentic Thinking Map - Agent freedom. Explicit movement rules." width="100%" />
2
+ <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/main/docs/assets/fpf-agentic-thinking-map-header-v20260818.png" alt="FPF Agentic Thinking Map - Agent freedom. Explicit movement rules." width="100%" />
39
3
  </p>
40
4
 
41
5
  # FPF Agentic Thinking Map
@@ -49,12 +13,12 @@ context. The model can inspect the map and choose; the runtime decides whether
49
13
  the move is valid.
50
14
 
51
15
  [![PyPI](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/fpf-thinking-map?style=flat-square&label=PyPI&color=3775A9)](https://pypi.org/project/fpf-thinking-map/)
52
- [![Downloads (honest)](https://img.shields.io/badge/downloads%20%28honest%29-4k-1f6feb?style=flat-square)](https://pypistats.org/packages/fpf-thinking-map)
53
- [![Python](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/fpf-thinking-map?style=flat-square&label=Python&color=f0b429)](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/pyproject.toml)
54
- [![License](https://img.shields.io/pypi/l/fpf-thinking-map?style=flat-square&label=license&color=57c7bd)](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/LICENSE)
55
- [![Zero dependencies](https://img.shields.io/badge/dependencies-0-ff9f43?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/pyproject.toml)
56
- [![Verification](https://img.shields.io/badge/verify-26%2F26-59d18c?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/fpf_thinking_map/verify.py)
57
- [![Live demo](https://img.shields.io/badge/live-demo-dd8cff?style=flat-square)](https://igareosh.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html)
16
+ [![Downloads (honest)](https://img.shields.io/badge/downloads%20%28honest%29-4.5k-1f6feb?style=flat-square)](https://pypistats.org/packages/fpf-thinking-map)
17
+ [![Python](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/fpf-thinking-map?style=flat-square&label=Python&color=f0b429)](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/pyproject.toml)
18
+ [![License](https://img.shields.io/pypi/l/fpf-thinking-map?style=flat-square&label=license&color=57c7bd)](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/LICENSE)
19
+ [![Zero dependencies](https://img.shields.io/badge/dependencies-0-ff9f43?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/pyproject.toml)
20
+ [![Verification](https://img.shields.io/badge/verify-35%2F35-59d18c?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/fpf_thinking_map/verify.py)
21
+ [![Live demo](https://img.shields.io/badge/live-demo-dd8cff?style=flat-square)](https://consolidare-continuum.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html)
58
22
 
59
23
  ```bash
60
24
  pip install fpf-thinking-map
@@ -63,13 +27,13 @@ python -m fpf_thinking_map.verify
63
27
 
64
28
  ## Important links
65
29
 
66
- - [ARCHITECTURE.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/ARCHITECTURE.md)
67
- - [VERSION_TRACKER.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md)
68
- - [TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md)
69
- - [REFLECTIONS.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/REFLECTIONS.md)
70
- - [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
71
- - [ADVISORIES.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md)
72
- - [`dev_mcp/`](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/tree/main/dev_mcp)
30
+ - [ARCHITECTURE.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/ARCHITECTURE.md)
31
+ - [VERSION_TRACKER.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md)
32
+ - [TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md)
33
+ - [REFLECTIONS.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/REFLECTIONS.md)
34
+ - [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
35
+ - [ADVISORIES.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md)
36
+ - [`dev_mcp/`](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/tree/main/dev_mcp)
73
37
 
74
38
  The `dev_mcp` development and compliance harness is genuinely tested against
75
39
  the package and updated whenever runtime behavior, compliance checks, or
@@ -90,11 +54,31 @@ into ordinary code:
90
54
  - cross-context bridges;
91
55
  - human authorization;
92
56
  - external dependencies and wake conditions;
93
- - concrete move identity and trace lineage.
57
+ - concrete move identity and trace lineage;
58
+ - typed claim scope and pathwise assurance;
59
+ - tool-call plan closure and hard autonomy budgets.
94
60
 
95
61
  This is not another reasoning prompt. It is a compact control surface around
96
62
  reasoning.
97
63
 
64
+ ## Why this works across model sizes
65
+
66
+ The map clips interpretive slack at both ends. Strong models stop
67
+ free-associating past what a constraint actually says; lighter models receive
68
+ enough scaffolding that they do not have to infer the workflow's intent from
69
+ scratch.
70
+
71
+ Building a good map still requires real judgment, so new controls should be
72
+ designed and challenged with strong models first. Consuming the finished map
73
+ does not require the same reasoning capacity. Once a workflow is encoded as
74
+ explicit constraints and gates instead of tacit prose, following it correctly
75
+ stops depending on frontier-level inference. A lighter model does not have to
76
+ understand the workflow deeply; it has to respect the map.
77
+
78
+ That is what makes the result portable down to smaller models, not merely
79
+ across flagship ones: the hard reasoning was front-loaded into the encoding,
80
+ once, by the map author.
81
+
98
82
  ## The contract
99
83
 
100
84
  The division of responsibility is deliberate:
@@ -112,15 +96,28 @@ The division of responsibility is deliberate:
112
96
  The map constrains movement, not meaning. It does not replace the model,
113
97
  application logic, retrieval, tools, or a task scheduler.
114
98
 
99
+ ## Structural agentic controls
100
+
101
+ | Concern | Runtime structure | Enforced effect |
102
+ | --- | --- | --- |
103
+ | Claim applicability and assurance | `ContextSlice`, `ClaimScope`, `FormalityLevel`, `ReliabilityPath` | Numeric G is no longer treated as scope; unknown membership stays unknown; R folds pathwise |
104
+ | Tool-call planning | `CallPlanPrimitive`, `BudgetEnvelope`, `CheckpointReturn` | Incomplete or mismatched declared tool plans return `REVISE_PLAN` and cannot fire |
105
+ | Autonomous enactment | `AutonomyBudgetDecl`, `AutonomyLedgerEntry` | A transition opts in with `requires_autonomy_budget_id`; failed assignment/gate/envelope returns `ESCALATE` and successful burn is recorded |
106
+ | Performed-work attribution | `WorkPrimitive.performed_under`, `validate_work_attribution()` | Once a map declares RoleAssignments, a dangling or wrong-holder work record cannot satisfy completion |
107
+ | Gate decisions | `GateDecision`, `GateCheck.failure_decision`, `OutcomeCause` | `ABSTAIN` means the gate lacks enough basis to say yes; an explicit `BLOCK` means policy says no for the current evaluation. Traversal preserves the distinction as `cause=gate_block` without breaking the existing outcome enum |
108
+ | Map integrity | `ThinkingMapTraversal.validate_map()` | Opt-in preflight fails on dangling gate/rule references; explicit unknown transition IDs return typed `ABSTAIN` |
109
+
110
+ These are bounded runtime compilations, not a port of the full FPF framework.
111
+
115
112
  ## Live runtime visual
116
113
 
117
- [![Three test-backed traces of the traversal runtime](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/main/docs/assets/three-runs-preview.png)](https://igareosh.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html)
114
+ [![Four test-backed traces of the traversal runtime](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/main/docs/assets/three-runs-preview.png)](https://consolidare-continuum.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html)
118
115
 
119
- **[Open the interactive three-run trace](https://igareosh.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html)**
116
+ **[Open the interactive four-run trace](https://consolidare-continuum.github.io/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/demos/three-runs.html)**
120
117
 
121
118
  The visual follows evidence recovery, `PendingInput`/`AWAIT`, `MoveIntent`,
122
- state-bound authorization, and successful traced movement in the current
123
- runtime.
119
+ state-bound authorization, and the v1.9.5 distinction between an undecided
120
+ gate (`ABSTAIN`) and an explicit hard denial (`BLOCK`).
124
121
 
125
122
  ## Minimal example
126
123
 
@@ -160,6 +157,7 @@ semantic_map.register_transition(
160
157
  "deploy",
161
158
  "candidate",
162
159
  "released",
160
+ required_gate_id="release_gate",
163
161
  required_evidence=["test_results"],
164
162
  )
165
163
  )
@@ -211,6 +209,19 @@ Gates test declared conditions. Guards enforce hard constraints. A small
211
209
  propositional layer composes facts without asking the model to reinterpret the
212
210
  rules on every step.
213
211
 
212
+ When a gate cannot return `PASS`, v1.9.5 keeps two different situations apart:
213
+
214
+ | Gate result | Plain-language meaning | Typical traversal response |
215
+ | --- | --- | --- |
216
+ | `ABSTAIN` (`"insufficient"`) | The gate does not have enough basis to say yes | `COLLECT_EVIDENCE` when the missing evidence is declared; otherwise a denied outcome |
217
+ | `BLOCK` | A check explicitly says no under the current declared policy and state | denied with `cause=OutcomeCause.GATE_BLOCK` |
218
+
219
+ `BLOCK` is hard for that evaluation, not necessarily permanent. It must not be
220
+ downgraded by another check or treated as an invitation to guess, but the gate
221
+ may evaluate differently after its declared evidence, state, or policy changes.
222
+ Existing checks do not become hard blocks automatically; a check opts in with
223
+ `failure_decision=GateDecision.BLOCK`.
224
+
214
225
  ### Validated bridges
215
226
 
216
227
  Cross-context movement is explicit. High-risk substitution without a
@@ -260,13 +271,14 @@ by expanding into a general agent framework.
260
271
  | v1.7 | State-bound, expiring authorization receipts |
261
272
  | v1.8 | External dependency tracking and `AWAIT` |
262
273
  | v1.9 | Concrete move identity, inspection, lineage, authorization-clock fix |
274
+ | v1.9.5 "Ground Stop" | Correct A.21 gate join; explicit `BLOCK` versus insufficient `ABSTAIN`; typed denial causes; opt-in structural controls |
263
275
 
264
276
  The complete reader-facing history is in
265
- [docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md).
277
+ [docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md).
266
278
  Technical changes are in
267
- [CHANGELOG.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md),
279
+ [CHANGELOG.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md),
268
280
  and full release bodies remain in
269
- [GitHub Releases](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/releases).
281
+ [GitHub Releases](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/releases).
270
282
 
271
283
  This separation is intentional: the README describes the stable product; the
272
284
  tracker records how that product became stronger.
@@ -287,15 +299,28 @@ python -m fpf_thinking_map.verify
287
299
  python -m fpf_thinking_map.examples
288
300
  ```
289
301
 
302
+ The 1.9.5 gate distinction was also replayed through `dev_mcp` with the same
303
+ missing `release_permit` under two policies:
304
+
305
+ ```text
306
+ default check -> gate: insufficient -> outcome: collect_evidence
307
+ explicit BLOCK -> gate: block -> outcome: denied (cause: gate_block)
308
+ permit present -> gate: pass -> outcome: continue
309
+ ```
310
+
311
+ That is the release contract in one view: uncertainty requests a resolution
312
+ path; a declared hard denial stops the move and remains identifiable to the
313
+ caller.
314
+
290
315
  The compiled state slice was also measured against injecting the corresponding
291
316
  raw FPF sections at five shipped decision points. The measured slice was much
292
317
  smaller, but this is a traversal-context result, not a claim about general
293
318
  intelligence or total application cost. Method and limitations:
294
- [TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md).
319
+ [TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/TRIPLE_TAX_CALCULUS.md).
295
320
 
296
321
  For the authorization experiments, threat boundaries, failures found, and
297
322
  claims deliberately not made, see
298
- [IGNITION_LOCK_WIND_TUNNEL.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/IGNITION_LOCK_WIND_TUNNEL.md).
323
+ [IGNITION_LOCK_WIND_TUNNEL.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/IGNITION_LOCK_WIND_TUNNEL.md).
299
324
 
300
325
  ## Scope
301
326
 
@@ -320,19 +345,19 @@ Do not use it as:
320
345
 
321
346
  Correct map authoring and correct host integration remain part of the trust
322
347
  boundary. Known sharp edges and deliberate non-goals are recorded in
323
- [ADVISORIES.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md).
348
+ [ADVISORIES.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md).
324
349
 
325
350
  ## Repository guide
326
351
 
327
352
  | Path | Purpose |
328
353
  | --- | --- |
329
- | [`fpf_thinking_map/`](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/tree/main/fpf_thinking_map) | Zero-dependency runtime published to PyPI |
330
- | [`dev_mcp/`](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/tree/main/dev_mcp) | Separate development and compliance-testing harness |
331
- | [ARCHITECTURE.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/ARCHITECTURE.md) | Verified control flow and module architecture |
332
- | [docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md) | Every release, with three practical consequences |
333
- | [docs/DECISIONS_REJECTIONS_ADOPTIONS.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/DECISIONS_REJECTIONS_ADOPTIONS.md) | Design provenance and rejected scope |
334
- | [docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md) | Integration boundaries and known sharp edges |
335
- | [SHA256SUMS](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/SHA256SUMS) | Repository-wide source fingerprints |
354
+ | [`fpf_thinking_map/`](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/tree/main/fpf_thinking_map) | Zero-dependency runtime published to PyPI |
355
+ | [`dev_mcp/`](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/tree/main/dev_mcp) | Separate development and compliance-testing harness |
356
+ | [ARCHITECTURE.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/ARCHITECTURE.md) | Verified control flow and module architecture |
357
+ | [docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/VERSION_TRACKER.md) | Every release, with three practical consequences |
358
+ | [docs/DECISIONS_REJECTIONS_ADOPTIONS.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/DECISIONS_REJECTIONS_ADOPTIONS.md) | Design provenance and rejected scope |
359
+ | [docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/ADVISORIES.md) | Integration boundaries and known sharp edges |
360
+ | [SHA256SUMS](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/SHA256SUMS) | Repository-wide source fingerprints |
336
361
 
337
362
  ## Design rules
338
363
 
@@ -354,14 +379,14 @@ FPF provides the broad conceptual frame. This package compiles a selected part
354
379
  of that frame into a practical traversal runtime. It may omit or reject
355
380
  patterns that do not improve this package's observable agent behavior.
356
381
 
357
- See [NOTICE](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/NOTICE)
358
- and [SOURCES.md](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/SOURCES.md)
382
+ See [NOTICE](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/NOTICE)
383
+ and [SOURCES.md](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/docs/deep/SOURCES.md)
359
384
  for attribution and scope boundaries.
360
385
 
361
386
  ## License and contact
362
387
 
363
388
  MIT License. See
364
- [LICENSE](https://github.com/igareosh/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/LICENSE).
389
+ [LICENSE](https://github.com/Consolidare-Continuum/fpf-agentic-thinking-map/blob/main/LICENSE).
365
390
 
366
391
  Maintained by [igareosh.com](https://igareosh.com) ·
367
392
  [@igareosh](https://github.com/igareosh) ·