fomo-iqa 0.1.0__tar.gz
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/LICENSE +201 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/PKG-INFO +219 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/README.md +196 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/fomo/__init__.py +28 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/fomo/dinov3.py +240 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/fomo/hub.py +137 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/fomo/model.py +499 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/fomo_iqa.egg-info/PKG-INFO +219 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/fomo_iqa.egg-info/SOURCES.txt +12 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/fomo_iqa.egg-info/dependency_links.txt +1 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/fomo_iqa.egg-info/requires.txt +10 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/fomo_iqa.egg-info/top_level.txt +1 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/pyproject.toml +35 -0
- fomo_iqa-0.1.0/setup.cfg +4 -0
fomo_iqa-0.1.0/LICENSE
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Apache License
|
|
2
|
+
Version 2.0, January 2004
|
|
3
|
+
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
1. Definitions.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
"License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
|
|
10
|
+
and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
|
|
13
|
+
the copyright owner that is granting the License.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
"Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
|
|
16
|
+
other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
|
|
17
|
+
control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
|
|
18
|
+
"control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
|
|
19
|
+
direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
|
|
20
|
+
otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
|
|
21
|
+
outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
"You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
|
|
24
|
+
exercising permissions granted by this License.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
"Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
|
|
27
|
+
including but not limited to software source code, documentation
|
|
28
|
+
source, and configuration files.
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
"Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
|
|
31
|
+
transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
|
|
32
|
+
not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
|
|
33
|
+
and conversions to other media types.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
"Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
|
|
36
|
+
Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
|
|
37
|
+
copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
|
|
38
|
+
(an example is provided in the Appendix below).
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
"Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
|
|
41
|
+
form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
|
|
42
|
+
editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
|
|
43
|
+
represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
|
|
44
|
+
of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
|
|
45
|
+
separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
|
|
46
|
+
the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
"Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
|
|
49
|
+
the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
|
|
50
|
+
to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
|
|
51
|
+
submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
|
|
52
|
+
or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
|
|
53
|
+
the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
|
|
54
|
+
means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
|
|
55
|
+
to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
|
|
56
|
+
communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
|
|
57
|
+
and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
|
|
58
|
+
Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
|
|
59
|
+
excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
|
|
60
|
+
designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
"Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
|
|
63
|
+
on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
|
|
64
|
+
subsequently incorporated within the Work.
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
|
|
67
|
+
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
|
|
68
|
+
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
|
|
69
|
+
copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
|
|
70
|
+
publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
|
|
71
|
+
Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
|
|
74
|
+
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
|
|
75
|
+
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
|
|
76
|
+
(except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
|
|
77
|
+
use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
|
|
78
|
+
where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
|
|
79
|
+
by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
|
|
80
|
+
Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
|
|
81
|
+
with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
|
|
82
|
+
institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
|
|
83
|
+
cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
|
|
84
|
+
or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
|
|
85
|
+
or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
|
|
86
|
+
granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
|
|
87
|
+
as of the date such litigation is filed.
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
|
|
90
|
+
Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
|
|
91
|
+
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
|
|
92
|
+
meet the following conditions:
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
(a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
|
|
95
|
+
Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
(b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
|
|
98
|
+
stating that You changed the files; and
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
(c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
|
|
101
|
+
that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
|
|
102
|
+
attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
|
|
103
|
+
excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
|
|
104
|
+
the Derivative Works; and
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
(d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
|
|
107
|
+
distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
|
|
108
|
+
include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
|
|
109
|
+
within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
|
|
110
|
+
pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
|
|
111
|
+
of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
|
|
112
|
+
as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
|
|
113
|
+
documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
|
|
114
|
+
within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
|
|
115
|
+
wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
|
|
116
|
+
of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
|
|
117
|
+
do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
|
|
118
|
+
notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
|
|
119
|
+
or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
|
|
120
|
+
that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
|
|
121
|
+
as modifying the License.
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
|
|
124
|
+
may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
|
|
125
|
+
for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
|
|
126
|
+
for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
|
|
127
|
+
reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
|
|
128
|
+
the conditions stated in this License.
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
|
|
131
|
+
any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
|
|
132
|
+
by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
|
|
133
|
+
this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
|
|
134
|
+
Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
|
|
135
|
+
the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
|
|
136
|
+
with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
|
|
139
|
+
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
|
|
140
|
+
except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
|
|
141
|
+
origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
|
|
144
|
+
agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
|
|
145
|
+
Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
146
|
+
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
|
|
147
|
+
implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
|
|
148
|
+
of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
|
|
149
|
+
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
|
|
150
|
+
appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
|
|
151
|
+
risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
|
|
154
|
+
whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
|
|
155
|
+
unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
|
|
156
|
+
negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
|
|
157
|
+
liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
|
|
158
|
+
incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
|
|
159
|
+
result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
|
|
160
|
+
Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
|
|
161
|
+
work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
|
|
162
|
+
other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
|
|
163
|
+
has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
|
|
166
|
+
the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
|
|
167
|
+
and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
|
|
168
|
+
or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
|
|
169
|
+
License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
|
|
170
|
+
on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
|
|
171
|
+
of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
|
|
172
|
+
defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
|
|
173
|
+
incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
|
|
174
|
+
of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
176
|
+
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
178
|
+
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
|
|
181
|
+
boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
|
|
182
|
+
replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
|
|
183
|
+
the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
|
|
184
|
+
comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
|
|
185
|
+
file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
|
|
186
|
+
same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
|
|
187
|
+
identification within third-party archives.
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
|
|
190
|
+
|
|
191
|
+
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
192
|
+
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
193
|
+
You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
194
|
+
|
|
195
|
+
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
197
|
+
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
198
|
+
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
199
|
+
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
200
|
+
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
201
|
+
limitations under the License.
|
fomo_iqa-0.1.0/PKG-INFO
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Metadata-Version: 2.4
|
|
2
|
+
Name: fomo-iqa
|
|
3
|
+
Version: 0.1.0
|
|
4
|
+
Summary: FoMo: Forking Moment in Generative Trajectory as a Perceptual Distance — reference-based perceptual distance models trained on diffusion-generated (FLUX) image pairs
|
|
5
|
+
Author: Jaihyun Lew
|
|
6
|
+
License: Apache-2.0
|
|
7
|
+
Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/JHLew/FoMo
|
|
8
|
+
Keywords: image-quality-assessment,perceptual-metric,perceptual-loss,IQA
|
|
9
|
+
Requires-Python: >=3.10
|
|
10
|
+
Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
|
|
11
|
+
License-File: LICENSE
|
|
12
|
+
Requires-Dist: torch>=2.1
|
|
13
|
+
Requires-Dist: torchvision
|
|
14
|
+
Requires-Dist: transformers>=4.56
|
|
15
|
+
Requires-Dist: huggingface_hub
|
|
16
|
+
Requires-Dist: lpips>=0.1.4
|
|
17
|
+
Requires-Dist: DISTS-pytorch>=0.1
|
|
18
|
+
Requires-Dist: dreamsim>=0.2.1
|
|
19
|
+
Requires-Dist: peft
|
|
20
|
+
Requires-Dist: numpy
|
|
21
|
+
Requires-Dist: pillow
|
|
22
|
+
Dynamic: license-file
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
# FoMo: Forking Moment in Generative Trajectory as a Perceptual Distance
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
<p align="center">
|
|
27
|
+
<img src="figures/FoMo_main.png" alt="FoMo: data generation from the forking moment of the diffusion trajectory, and ranked-BCE training" width="100%">
|
|
28
|
+
</p>
|
|
29
|
+
<p align="center">
|
|
30
|
+
<img src="figures/FoMo_generated_pairs.png" alt="Examples of generated image pairs at different forking moments" width="100%">
|
|
31
|
+
</p>
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
FoMo trains reference-based perceptual distance metrics **without human labels**. Running a diffusion model (FLUX.1-dev) in img2img mode from a base image, re-entering the trajectory `s` denoising steps before the end, produces a variant whose perceptual deviation from the base grows monotonically with `s` — the *forking moment* of the generative trajectory. The timestep is therefore a free, dense supervision signal: we generate 480k such image sets and train distance models with a pairwise ranking objective on it.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
Seven models are released, all trained on the same 480k FoMo dataset with the same ranked-BCE objective; only the frozen backbone / trainable part differs:
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
| Name | Architecture | Trained part |
|
|
38
|
+
|---|---|---|
|
|
39
|
+
| `lpips_alex` | LPIPS, AlexNet features | linear calibration weights |
|
|
40
|
+
| `lpips_vgg` | LPIPS, VGG-16 features | linear calibration weights |
|
|
41
|
+
| `dists` | DISTS, VGG-16 features | α / β mixing weights |
|
|
42
|
+
| `dinov3` | frozen DINOv3 ViT-S/16+ + prediction head | 3-layer 2D-RoPE transformer head |
|
|
43
|
+
| `clip` | frozen CLIP ViT-B/32 + prediction head | 3-layer 2D-RoPE transformer head |
|
|
44
|
+
| `mae` | frozen MAE ViT-B/16 + prediction head | 3-layer 2D-RoPE transformer head |
|
|
45
|
+
| `dreamsim` | DreamSim ensemble (DINO + CLIP + OpenCLIP ViT-B/16) | LoRA adapters (r=16) |
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
## Using the pretrained models
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
```bash
|
|
50
|
+
pip install fomo-iqa # or, from this repository: pip install -e .
|
|
51
|
+
```
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
(The distribution is `fomo-iqa` because `fomo` is taken on PyPI; the import name is `fomo`.)
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
```python
|
|
56
|
+
import fomo
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
# A model is defined by its backbone alone. How the score is presented —
|
|
59
|
+
# `symmetric` and `output` — is chosen per call, so one model serves every use.
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
# --- a CNN model --------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
62
|
+
lpips_alex = fomo.FoMo('lpips_alex')
|
|
63
|
+
d = lpips_alex(img_ref, img_test) # [B]; lower = more similar
|
|
64
|
+
# already non-negative with d(x, x) = 0,
|
|
65
|
+
# and symmetric by construction, so
|
|
66
|
+
# `symmetric` and 'distance' change nothing
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
# --- a prediction-head model --------------------------------------------------
|
|
69
|
+
dinov3 = fomo.FoMo('dinov3')
|
|
70
|
+
d_raw = dinov3(img_ref, img_test, symmetric=True) # 'raw' (default): the
|
|
71
|
+
# published protocol. A ranking
|
|
72
|
+
# score with an arbitrary zero
|
|
73
|
+
# point, so it may be negative
|
|
74
|
+
d_dist = dinov3(img_ref, img_test, symmetric=True, output='distance') # non-negative, d(x, x) ≈ 0,
|
|
75
|
+
# LPIPS-style. Ranks pairs
|
|
76
|
+
# identically to 'raw'
|
|
77
|
+
d_asym = dinov3(img_ref, img_test, symmetric=False) # single order s(x, y)
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
# `symmetric=True` is the default and only affects dinov3 / clip / mae, where the
|
|
80
|
+
# head reads the two images as one sequence: it averages both argument orders
|
|
81
|
+
# from a single backbone pass.
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
# --- as a perceptual loss ------------------------------------------------------
|
|
84
|
+
# differentiable w.r.t. the inputs. output='loss' is hinged at the identity
|
|
85
|
+
# level, so optimization settles once the images are as close as identical
|
|
86
|
+
# instead of continuing past that point.
|
|
87
|
+
loss = dinov3(prediction, target, output='loss').mean()
|
|
88
|
+
loss.backward()
|
|
89
|
+
```
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
`fomo.load(name)` returns the underlying `DistanceModel` (method `eval_distance`), and `checkpoint='path/to/file.pth'` loads a local file — including a `ckpt_latest.pt` produced by `train.py` (its EMA weights are used). `python example_usage.py --model dinov3 --mode metric|loss` is a runnable demo.
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
**Inputs.** Float tensors `[B, 3, H, W]` in `[0, 1]`. Do **not** normalize — each model applies its own preprocessing (ImageNet statistics for DINOv3 / MAE, CLIP statistics for CLIP, `[-1, 1]` for LPIPS, raw for DISTS, bicubic resize to 224 for DreamSim). Both images of a pair must share a spatial size; any size works (the ViT models zero-pad to their patch grid). Benchmarks are scored at native resolution.
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
**Distance options.**
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
- `lpips_alex`, `lpips_vgg`, `dists` and `dreamsim` compute a symmetric distance directly (DreamSim as the cosine distance of its embeddings). `dinov3`, `clip` and `mae` read the two images as one concatenated token sequence and output a scalar for that ordered pair.
|
|
98
|
+
- `symmetric` (default `True`): for `dinov3` / `clip` / `mae` the output `s(x, y)` need not equal `s(y, x)`, so the score is `½ [s(x, y) + s(y, x)]`, both orders from a single backbone pass. `symmetric=False` returns the single order `s(x, y)`.
|
|
99
|
+
- `output` (default `'raw'`): which of three presentations the score is returned in. `'raw'` and `'distance'` are the same metric in two scales — softplus is strictly increasing, so they rank every pair identically (SROCC and KROCC agree to the last digit). `'loss'` subtracts a per-pair quantity and is shaped for optimization rather than for ranking.
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
| `output` | what it returns | use it for |
|
|
102
|
+
|---|---|---|
|
|
103
|
+
| `'raw'` (default) | the model output, unchanged | reproducing the published numbers |
|
|
104
|
+
| `'distance'` | non-negative, `d(x, x) ≈ 0` | a drop-in LPIPS-style metric |
|
|
105
|
+
| `'loss'` | `relu( d(x, y) − max(d(x, x), d(y, y)) )` | a perceptual loss / image optimization |
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
`'raw'` is the protocol every published number was computed under. For `dinov3` / `clip` / `mae` it is a ranking score whose zero point is arbitrary, so it may be negative; `lpips_alex`, `lpips_vgg`, `dists` and `dreamsim` return a non-negative distance with `d(x, x) = 0` directly.
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
`'distance'` applies softplus to `dinov3` / `clip` / `mae` — mapping their identity level to `≈ 0` and giving a positive output everywhere, with no calibration constant to fit or ship — and leaves the other four untouched, since they already have an exact `d(x, x) = 0` (softplus would move it to `log 2 ≈ 0.693`). The rule differs by model family so that the *semantics* are uniform: all seven are non-negative with `d(x, x) ≈ 0`. Rankings are identical to `'raw'`; use `'raw'` to reproduce the published numbers exactly.
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
`'loss'` is a hinge whose floor sits at the per-pair identity level: full gradient while the images differ, and zero once they are as close as identical, so optimization stops there rather than pushing past it. Softplus is *not* applied — the relu already makes the output non-negative. The anchor is detached, because it depends on the image being optimized: with gradients flowing through it, the optimizer could lower the loss by raising `d(y, y)` rather than matching the reference.
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
**Backbone downloads.** The frozen backbones are fetched from their public sources on first use (torchvision for AlexNet / VGG, HuggingFace for CLIP / MAE / DINOv3, the DreamSim release for its three ViTs, ~1.5 GB into `~/.cache/fomo/dreamsim`, override with `FOMO_DREAMSIM_CACHE`). **DINOv3 is gated:** accept the license of `facebook/dinov3-vits16plus-pretrain-lvd1689m` on HuggingFace and run `huggingface-cli login` before using `dinov3`.
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
## Repository layout
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
```
|
|
118
|
+
fomo/ pip package (metric / loss usage)
|
|
119
|
+
├── model.py DistanceModel — the seven models
|
|
120
|
+
├── dinov3.py prediction head (2D-RoPE attention, SwiGLU, registers)
|
|
121
|
+
└── hub.py fomo.load() / fomo.FoMo, checkpoint download
|
|
122
|
+
generate_fomo_dataset.py FLUX img2img data generation
|
|
123
|
+
dataset.py FoMoDataset + paired augmentation, benchmark loaders
|
|
124
|
+
train.py ranked-BCE training
|
|
125
|
+
evaluation.py / evaluate.py PIPAL / TID2013 / CSIQ / LIVE metrics, CLI
|
|
126
|
+
example_usage.py metric + loss demo
|
|
127
|
+
checkpoints/ model card for the Hub repo (the .pth files live on the Hub)
|
|
128
|
+
scripts/
|
|
129
|
+
├── download_fomo_480k.sh fetch the released 480k training set
|
|
130
|
+
├── generate_fomo_480k.sh …or regenerate it with FLUX
|
|
131
|
+
├── setup_benchmarks.sh fetch the four evaluation benchmarks
|
|
132
|
+
└── train.sh train one model with the paper's configuration
|
|
133
|
+
```
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
## Environment
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
```bash
|
|
138
|
+
conda env create -f environment.yml # env "fomo": torch 2.9.1, transformers 4.57.3, diffusers 0.37.1
|
|
139
|
+
conda activate fomo
|
|
140
|
+
```
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
Training assumes a bf16-capable GPU (an L40 / A100 class card runs every recipe at batch 64); evaluation runs on one GPU.
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
## Data
|
|
145
|
+
|
|
146
|
+
**Download the released dataset** (recommended) — 480,000 samples at 512×512, hosted as 240 tar shards (~550 GB) at [JHLew/fomo_480k](https://huggingface.co/datasets/JHLew/fomo_480k):
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
```bash
|
|
149
|
+
bash scripts/download_fomo_480k.sh # → ./data/fomo/{train/…, index.json}
|
|
150
|
+
```
|
|
151
|
+
|
|
152
|
+
Each sample is a base image plus two img2img variants at random timesteps `s ∈ [1, 50]` (FLUX.1-dev, 50 steps, guidance 3.5; the variant files are named by `s`). The `s` used in this repository and in the dataset corresponds to `S − s` in the paper, with `S = 50`. Half of the bases are generated from a blank canvas (`FLUX_*`), half are ImageNet-1k crops (`IN1K_*`). `index.json` lists `{"base": …, "variants": […]}` with paths relative to the dataset root.
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
**Or regenerate it** — this is the data-generation pipeline, the core of the method:
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
```bash
|
|
157
|
+
huggingface-cli login # FLUX.1-dev is gated
|
|
158
|
+
bash scripts/generate_fomo_480k.sh # STAGE=scratch|in1k|both, shard with IDX_FROM / IDX_TO
|
|
159
|
+
```
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
`generate_fomo_dataset.py` writes `<out>/train/<TAG>_<idx>/{base.png, <t1>.png, <t2>.png}` and appends to `index.json`. The IN1K stage needs ImageNet-1k at `./imagenet-1k/train/<class>/*.JPEG`. Generation is expensive (2–3 FLUX calls per sample); shard the index range across GPUs.
|
|
162
|
+
|
|
163
|
+
**Benchmarks:**
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
```bash
|
|
166
|
+
bash scripts/setup_benchmarks.sh # PIPAL, TID2013, CSIQ, LIVE → ./benchmarks/
|
|
167
|
+
```
|
|
168
|
+
|
|
169
|
+
## Training
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
One command trains a model with the paper's configuration and evaluates it on the four benchmarks after every epoch:
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
```bash
|
|
174
|
+
bash scripts/train.sh dino # lpips_alex | lpips_vgg | dists | dino | clip | mae | dreamsim
|
|
175
|
+
```
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
which runs
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
```bash
|
|
180
|
+
python train.py --exp_name dino --backbone dino \
|
|
181
|
+
--dataroot ./data/fomo --train_index_file ./data/fomo/index.json \
|
|
182
|
+
--epochs 3 --batch_size 64 --lr 1e-4 --min_crop_size 64 --max_crop_size 256
|
|
183
|
+
```
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
Each sample yields one training pair: two of its three images in random order (or, with probability 1/51, an image paired with itself), labelled with the FLUX-space value of the larger timestep `s` of the two, recomputed for the sampled resolution. The ranked-BCE loss scores every ordered pair of samples in the batch against this label ordering. Settings:
|
|
186
|
+
|
|
187
|
+
- `lpips_alex` / `lpips_vgg` / `dists`: `--lr 2e-4`, fixed crops `--min_crop_size 256 --max_crop_size 256`.
|
|
188
|
+
- `dino` / `clip` / `mae`: `--lr 1e-4`, random 64–256 crops batched by zero-padding + attention masking.
|
|
189
|
+
- `dreamsim`: `--lr 1e-4`, fixed `--min_crop_size 224 --max_crop_size 224` (fixed-resolution ensemble).
|
|
190
|
+
- Benchmarks are evaluated after every epoch with the **EMA weights at native resolution**; the final epoch is what is reported. Outputs go to `experiments/<exp_name>/` (`ckpt_latest.pt`, `metrics.json`, `train.log`, TensorBoard); rerunning the same command resumes.
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
The final-epoch numbers of such a run land close to the table below. Any checkpoint can be re-scored on its own:
|
|
193
|
+
|
|
194
|
+
```bash
|
|
195
|
+
python evaluate.py --model dinov3 # released weights
|
|
196
|
+
python evaluate.py --model dinov3 --checkpoint experiments/dino/ckpt_latest.pt # your run
|
|
197
|
+
```
|
|
198
|
+
|
|
199
|
+
### Results
|
|
200
|
+
|
|
201
|
+
SROCC / KROCC / PLCC of the released checkpoints (native resolution; PLCC after a 5-parameter logistic fit). `python evaluate.py --model <name>` reproduces every cell:
|
|
202
|
+
|
|
203
|
+
| Model | PIPAL | TID2013 | CSIQ | LIVE |
|
|
204
|
+
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
205
|
+
| LPIPS-Alex| 0.739 / 0.541 / 0.773 | 0.782 / 0.583 / 0.813 | 0.940 / 0.784 / 0.946 | 0.949 / 0.794 / 0.943 |
|
|
206
|
+
| LPIPS-VGG | 0.691 / 0.503 / 0.739 | 0.659 / 0.486 / 0.746 | 0.852 / 0.665 / 0.880 | 0.918 / 0.740 / 0.918 |
|
|
207
|
+
| DISTS | 0.616 / 0.437 / 0.657 | 0.692 / 0.513 / 0.771 | 0.919 / 0.750 / 0.931 | 0.954 / 0.804 / 0.949 |
|
|
208
|
+
| DINOv3 | 0.705 / 0.504 / 0.709 | 0.711 / 0.524 / 0.769 | 0.810 / 0.626 / 0.874 | 0.897 / 0.721 / 0.913 |
|
|
209
|
+
| CLIP | 0.668 / 0.479 / 0.679 | 0.744 / 0.556 / 0.800 | 0.911 / 0.735 / 0.928 | 0.935 / 0.770 / 0.936 |
|
|
210
|
+
| MAE | 0.644 / 0.453 / 0.634 | 0.674 / 0.495 / 0.681 | 0.817 / 0.625 / 0.830 | 0.919 / 0.752 / 0.926 |
|
|
211
|
+
| DreamSim | 0.790 / 0.585 / 0.779 | 0.806 / 0.610 / 0.836 | 0.894 / 0.710 / 0.905 | 0.933 / 0.773 / 0.936 |
|
|
212
|
+
|
|
213
|
+
## Citation
|
|
214
|
+
|
|
215
|
+
The paper is under review; citation information will be added here.
|
|
216
|
+
|
|
217
|
+
## License
|
|
218
|
+
|
|
219
|
+
Apache 2.0 — see [LICENSE](LICENSE). The backbones (DINOv3, CLIP, MAE, DreamSim's ViTs) and the `lpips` / `DISTS-pytorch` / `dreamsim` packages keep their own upstream licenses.
|
fomo_iqa-0.1.0/README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# FoMo: Forking Moment in Generative Trajectory as a Perceptual Distance
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
<p align="center">
|
|
4
|
+
<img src="figures/FoMo_main.png" alt="FoMo: data generation from the forking moment of the diffusion trajectory, and ranked-BCE training" width="100%">
|
|
5
|
+
</p>
|
|
6
|
+
<p align="center">
|
|
7
|
+
<img src="figures/FoMo_generated_pairs.png" alt="Examples of generated image pairs at different forking moments" width="100%">
|
|
8
|
+
</p>
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
FoMo trains reference-based perceptual distance metrics **without human labels**. Running a diffusion model (FLUX.1-dev) in img2img mode from a base image, re-entering the trajectory `s` denoising steps before the end, produces a variant whose perceptual deviation from the base grows monotonically with `s` — the *forking moment* of the generative trajectory. The timestep is therefore a free, dense supervision signal: we generate 480k such image sets and train distance models with a pairwise ranking objective on it.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
Seven models are released, all trained on the same 480k FoMo dataset with the same ranked-BCE objective; only the frozen backbone / trainable part differs:
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
| Name | Architecture | Trained part |
|
|
15
|
+
|---|---|---|
|
|
16
|
+
| `lpips_alex` | LPIPS, AlexNet features | linear calibration weights |
|
|
17
|
+
| `lpips_vgg` | LPIPS, VGG-16 features | linear calibration weights |
|
|
18
|
+
| `dists` | DISTS, VGG-16 features | α / β mixing weights |
|
|
19
|
+
| `dinov3` | frozen DINOv3 ViT-S/16+ + prediction head | 3-layer 2D-RoPE transformer head |
|
|
20
|
+
| `clip` | frozen CLIP ViT-B/32 + prediction head | 3-layer 2D-RoPE transformer head |
|
|
21
|
+
| `mae` | frozen MAE ViT-B/16 + prediction head | 3-layer 2D-RoPE transformer head |
|
|
22
|
+
| `dreamsim` | DreamSim ensemble (DINO + CLIP + OpenCLIP ViT-B/16) | LoRA adapters (r=16) |
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
## Using the pretrained models
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
```bash
|
|
27
|
+
pip install fomo-iqa # or, from this repository: pip install -e .
|
|
28
|
+
```
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
(The distribution is `fomo-iqa` because `fomo` is taken on PyPI; the import name is `fomo`.)
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
```python
|
|
33
|
+
import fomo
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
# A model is defined by its backbone alone. How the score is presented —
|
|
36
|
+
# `symmetric` and `output` — is chosen per call, so one model serves every use.
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
# --- a CNN model --------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
39
|
+
lpips_alex = fomo.FoMo('lpips_alex')
|
|
40
|
+
d = lpips_alex(img_ref, img_test) # [B]; lower = more similar
|
|
41
|
+
# already non-negative with d(x, x) = 0,
|
|
42
|
+
# and symmetric by construction, so
|
|
43
|
+
# `symmetric` and 'distance' change nothing
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
# --- a prediction-head model --------------------------------------------------
|
|
46
|
+
dinov3 = fomo.FoMo('dinov3')
|
|
47
|
+
d_raw = dinov3(img_ref, img_test, symmetric=True) # 'raw' (default): the
|
|
48
|
+
# published protocol. A ranking
|
|
49
|
+
# score with an arbitrary zero
|
|
50
|
+
# point, so it may be negative
|
|
51
|
+
d_dist = dinov3(img_ref, img_test, symmetric=True, output='distance') # non-negative, d(x, x) ≈ 0,
|
|
52
|
+
# LPIPS-style. Ranks pairs
|
|
53
|
+
# identically to 'raw'
|
|
54
|
+
d_asym = dinov3(img_ref, img_test, symmetric=False) # single order s(x, y)
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
# `symmetric=True` is the default and only affects dinov3 / clip / mae, where the
|
|
57
|
+
# head reads the two images as one sequence: it averages both argument orders
|
|
58
|
+
# from a single backbone pass.
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
# --- as a perceptual loss ------------------------------------------------------
|
|
61
|
+
# differentiable w.r.t. the inputs. output='loss' is hinged at the identity
|
|
62
|
+
# level, so optimization settles once the images are as close as identical
|
|
63
|
+
# instead of continuing past that point.
|
|
64
|
+
loss = dinov3(prediction, target, output='loss').mean()
|
|
65
|
+
loss.backward()
|
|
66
|
+
```
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
`fomo.load(name)` returns the underlying `DistanceModel` (method `eval_distance`), and `checkpoint='path/to/file.pth'` loads a local file — including a `ckpt_latest.pt` produced by `train.py` (its EMA weights are used). `python example_usage.py --model dinov3 --mode metric|loss` is a runnable demo.
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
**Inputs.** Float tensors `[B, 3, H, W]` in `[0, 1]`. Do **not** normalize — each model applies its own preprocessing (ImageNet statistics for DINOv3 / MAE, CLIP statistics for CLIP, `[-1, 1]` for LPIPS, raw for DISTS, bicubic resize to 224 for DreamSim). Both images of a pair must share a spatial size; any size works (the ViT models zero-pad to their patch grid). Benchmarks are scored at native resolution.
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
**Distance options.**
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
- `lpips_alex`, `lpips_vgg`, `dists` and `dreamsim` compute a symmetric distance directly (DreamSim as the cosine distance of its embeddings). `dinov3`, `clip` and `mae` read the two images as one concatenated token sequence and output a scalar for that ordered pair.
|
|
75
|
+
- `symmetric` (default `True`): for `dinov3` / `clip` / `mae` the output `s(x, y)` need not equal `s(y, x)`, so the score is `½ [s(x, y) + s(y, x)]`, both orders from a single backbone pass. `symmetric=False` returns the single order `s(x, y)`.
|
|
76
|
+
- `output` (default `'raw'`): which of three presentations the score is returned in. `'raw'` and `'distance'` are the same metric in two scales — softplus is strictly increasing, so they rank every pair identically (SROCC and KROCC agree to the last digit). `'loss'` subtracts a per-pair quantity and is shaped for optimization rather than for ranking.
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
| `output` | what it returns | use it for |
|
|
79
|
+
|---|---|---|
|
|
80
|
+
| `'raw'` (default) | the model output, unchanged | reproducing the published numbers |
|
|
81
|
+
| `'distance'` | non-negative, `d(x, x) ≈ 0` | a drop-in LPIPS-style metric |
|
|
82
|
+
| `'loss'` | `relu( d(x, y) − max(d(x, x), d(y, y)) )` | a perceptual loss / image optimization |
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
`'raw'` is the protocol every published number was computed under. For `dinov3` / `clip` / `mae` it is a ranking score whose zero point is arbitrary, so it may be negative; `lpips_alex`, `lpips_vgg`, `dists` and `dreamsim` return a non-negative distance with `d(x, x) = 0` directly.
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
`'distance'` applies softplus to `dinov3` / `clip` / `mae` — mapping their identity level to `≈ 0` and giving a positive output everywhere, with no calibration constant to fit or ship — and leaves the other four untouched, since they already have an exact `d(x, x) = 0` (softplus would move it to `log 2 ≈ 0.693`). The rule differs by model family so that the *semantics* are uniform: all seven are non-negative with `d(x, x) ≈ 0`. Rankings are identical to `'raw'`; use `'raw'` to reproduce the published numbers exactly.
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
`'loss'` is a hinge whose floor sits at the per-pair identity level: full gradient while the images differ, and zero once they are as close as identical, so optimization stops there rather than pushing past it. Softplus is *not* applied — the relu already makes the output non-negative. The anchor is detached, because it depends on the image being optimized: with gradients flowing through it, the optimizer could lower the loss by raising `d(y, y)` rather than matching the reference.
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
**Backbone downloads.** The frozen backbones are fetched from their public sources on first use (torchvision for AlexNet / VGG, HuggingFace for CLIP / MAE / DINOv3, the DreamSim release for its three ViTs, ~1.5 GB into `~/.cache/fomo/dreamsim`, override with `FOMO_DREAMSIM_CACHE`). **DINOv3 is gated:** accept the license of `facebook/dinov3-vits16plus-pretrain-lvd1689m` on HuggingFace and run `huggingface-cli login` before using `dinov3`.
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
## Repository layout
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
```
|
|
95
|
+
fomo/ pip package (metric / loss usage)
|
|
96
|
+
├── model.py DistanceModel — the seven models
|
|
97
|
+
├── dinov3.py prediction head (2D-RoPE attention, SwiGLU, registers)
|
|
98
|
+
└── hub.py fomo.load() / fomo.FoMo, checkpoint download
|
|
99
|
+
generate_fomo_dataset.py FLUX img2img data generation
|
|
100
|
+
dataset.py FoMoDataset + paired augmentation, benchmark loaders
|
|
101
|
+
train.py ranked-BCE training
|
|
102
|
+
evaluation.py / evaluate.py PIPAL / TID2013 / CSIQ / LIVE metrics, CLI
|
|
103
|
+
example_usage.py metric + loss demo
|
|
104
|
+
checkpoints/ model card for the Hub repo (the .pth files live on the Hub)
|
|
105
|
+
scripts/
|
|
106
|
+
├── download_fomo_480k.sh fetch the released 480k training set
|
|
107
|
+
├── generate_fomo_480k.sh …or regenerate it with FLUX
|
|
108
|
+
├── setup_benchmarks.sh fetch the four evaluation benchmarks
|
|
109
|
+
└── train.sh train one model with the paper's configuration
|
|
110
|
+
```
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
## Environment
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
```bash
|
|
115
|
+
conda env create -f environment.yml # env "fomo": torch 2.9.1, transformers 4.57.3, diffusers 0.37.1
|
|
116
|
+
conda activate fomo
|
|
117
|
+
```
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
Training assumes a bf16-capable GPU (an L40 / A100 class card runs every recipe at batch 64); evaluation runs on one GPU.
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
## Data
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
**Download the released dataset** (recommended) — 480,000 samples at 512×512, hosted as 240 tar shards (~550 GB) at [JHLew/fomo_480k](https://huggingface.co/datasets/JHLew/fomo_480k):
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
```bash
|
|
126
|
+
bash scripts/download_fomo_480k.sh # → ./data/fomo/{train/…, index.json}
|
|
127
|
+
```
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
Each sample is a base image plus two img2img variants at random timesteps `s ∈ [1, 50]` (FLUX.1-dev, 50 steps, guidance 3.5; the variant files are named by `s`). The `s` used in this repository and in the dataset corresponds to `S − s` in the paper, with `S = 50`. Half of the bases are generated from a blank canvas (`FLUX_*`), half are ImageNet-1k crops (`IN1K_*`). `index.json` lists `{"base": …, "variants": […]}` with paths relative to the dataset root.
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
**Or regenerate it** — this is the data-generation pipeline, the core of the method:
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
```bash
|
|
134
|
+
huggingface-cli login # FLUX.1-dev is gated
|
|
135
|
+
bash scripts/generate_fomo_480k.sh # STAGE=scratch|in1k|both, shard with IDX_FROM / IDX_TO
|
|
136
|
+
```
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
`generate_fomo_dataset.py` writes `<out>/train/<TAG>_<idx>/{base.png, <t1>.png, <t2>.png}` and appends to `index.json`. The IN1K stage needs ImageNet-1k at `./imagenet-1k/train/<class>/*.JPEG`. Generation is expensive (2–3 FLUX calls per sample); shard the index range across GPUs.
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
**Benchmarks:**
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
```bash
|
|
143
|
+
bash scripts/setup_benchmarks.sh # PIPAL, TID2013, CSIQ, LIVE → ./benchmarks/
|
|
144
|
+
```
|
|
145
|
+
|
|
146
|
+
## Training
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
One command trains a model with the paper's configuration and evaluates it on the four benchmarks after every epoch:
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
```bash
|
|
151
|
+
bash scripts/train.sh dino # lpips_alex | lpips_vgg | dists | dino | clip | mae | dreamsim
|
|
152
|
+
```
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
which runs
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
```bash
|
|
157
|
+
python train.py --exp_name dino --backbone dino \
|
|
158
|
+
--dataroot ./data/fomo --train_index_file ./data/fomo/index.json \
|
|
159
|
+
--epochs 3 --batch_size 64 --lr 1e-4 --min_crop_size 64 --max_crop_size 256
|
|
160
|
+
```
|
|
161
|
+
|
|
162
|
+
Each sample yields one training pair: two of its three images in random order (or, with probability 1/51, an image paired with itself), labelled with the FLUX-space value of the larger timestep `s` of the two, recomputed for the sampled resolution. The ranked-BCE loss scores every ordered pair of samples in the batch against this label ordering. Settings:
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
- `lpips_alex` / `lpips_vgg` / `dists`: `--lr 2e-4`, fixed crops `--min_crop_size 256 --max_crop_size 256`.
|
|
165
|
+
- `dino` / `clip` / `mae`: `--lr 1e-4`, random 64–256 crops batched by zero-padding + attention masking.
|
|
166
|
+
- `dreamsim`: `--lr 1e-4`, fixed `--min_crop_size 224 --max_crop_size 224` (fixed-resolution ensemble).
|
|
167
|
+
- Benchmarks are evaluated after every epoch with the **EMA weights at native resolution**; the final epoch is what is reported. Outputs go to `experiments/<exp_name>/` (`ckpt_latest.pt`, `metrics.json`, `train.log`, TensorBoard); rerunning the same command resumes.
|
|
168
|
+
|
|
169
|
+
The final-epoch numbers of such a run land close to the table below. Any checkpoint can be re-scored on its own:
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
```bash
|
|
172
|
+
python evaluate.py --model dinov3 # released weights
|
|
173
|
+
python evaluate.py --model dinov3 --checkpoint experiments/dino/ckpt_latest.pt # your run
|
|
174
|
+
```
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
176
|
+
### Results
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
178
|
+
SROCC / KROCC / PLCC of the released checkpoints (native resolution; PLCC after a 5-parameter logistic fit). `python evaluate.py --model <name>` reproduces every cell:
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
| Model | PIPAL | TID2013 | CSIQ | LIVE |
|
|
181
|
+
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
182
|
+
| LPIPS-Alex| 0.739 / 0.541 / 0.773 | 0.782 / 0.583 / 0.813 | 0.940 / 0.784 / 0.946 | 0.949 / 0.794 / 0.943 |
|
|
183
|
+
| LPIPS-VGG | 0.691 / 0.503 / 0.739 | 0.659 / 0.486 / 0.746 | 0.852 / 0.665 / 0.880 | 0.918 / 0.740 / 0.918 |
|
|
184
|
+
| DISTS | 0.616 / 0.437 / 0.657 | 0.692 / 0.513 / 0.771 | 0.919 / 0.750 / 0.931 | 0.954 / 0.804 / 0.949 |
|
|
185
|
+
| DINOv3 | 0.705 / 0.504 / 0.709 | 0.711 / 0.524 / 0.769 | 0.810 / 0.626 / 0.874 | 0.897 / 0.721 / 0.913 |
|
|
186
|
+
| CLIP | 0.668 / 0.479 / 0.679 | 0.744 / 0.556 / 0.800 | 0.911 / 0.735 / 0.928 | 0.935 / 0.770 / 0.936 |
|
|
187
|
+
| MAE | 0.644 / 0.453 / 0.634 | 0.674 / 0.495 / 0.681 | 0.817 / 0.625 / 0.830 | 0.919 / 0.752 / 0.926 |
|
|
188
|
+
| DreamSim | 0.790 / 0.585 / 0.779 | 0.806 / 0.610 / 0.836 | 0.894 / 0.710 / 0.905 | 0.933 / 0.773 / 0.936 |
|
|
189
|
+
|
|
190
|
+
## Citation
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
The paper is under review; citation information will be added here.
|
|
193
|
+
|
|
194
|
+
## License
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
Apache 2.0 — see [LICENSE](LICENSE). The backbones (DINOv3, CLIP, MAE, DreamSim's ViTs) and the `lpips` / `DISTS-pytorch` / `dreamsim` packages keep their own upstream licenses.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
"""
|
|
2
|
+
FoMo — perceptual image distance metrics trained on diffusion-generated
|
|
3
|
+
(FLUX.1-dev) image pairs.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
import fomo
|
|
6
|
+
metric = fomo.FoMo('dinov3') # downloads + caches the weights
|
|
7
|
+
d = metric(img_ref, img_test) # [B]; lower = more similar
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Models: lpips_alex, lpips_vgg, dists, dinov3, clip, mae, dreamsim.
|
|
10
|
+
Inputs: float tensors [B, 3, H, W] in [0, 1], not pre-normalized.
|
|
11
|
+
A model is defined by its backbone alone; the score presentation is chosen per
|
|
12
|
+
call. symmetric (default True) averages both argument orders for the
|
|
13
|
+
prediction-head models; output selects one of three presentations —
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
'raw' (default) the model output; the protocol the published
|
|
16
|
+
numbers use. The prediction-head models (dinov3 / clip / mae)
|
|
17
|
+
score pairs with a ranking value whose zero point is arbitrary,
|
|
18
|
+
so it may be negative.
|
|
19
|
+
'distance' non-negative with d(x, x) ~ 0, for drop-in LPIPS-style use;
|
|
20
|
+
ranks pairs identically to 'raw'.
|
|
21
|
+
'loss' hinged at the identity level, for use as a perceptual loss.
|
|
22
|
+
"""
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
from fomo.hub import MODELS, FoMo, load
|
|
25
|
+
from fomo.model import DistanceModel
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
__version__ = '0.1.0'
|
|
28
|
+
__all__ = ['FoMo', 'DistanceModel', 'load', 'MODELS', '__version__']
|