flagrant-client 0.1.0__tar.gz

flagrant_client-0.1.0/.agent-shell/transcripts/2026-08-11-10-19-43.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3157 @@
+# Agent Shell Transcript
+
+**Agent:** Kimi
+**Started:** 2026-08-11 10:20:02
+**Working Directory:** /Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/
+**Session ID:** a53def43-83c8-4ff9-866d-1d45ba2105a8
+**Model:** kimi-code/k3,thinking
+
+---
+
+## User (2026-08-11 10:20:02)
+
+how can I import this in ipython repl?
+
+src/flagrant_client/__init__.py:1-2
+
+   1: def hello() -> str:
+   2:     return "Hello from flagrant-client!"
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:20:09)
+
+Check pyproject.toml to see project setup and whether it's installed in .venv. Quick answer likely.
+
+### Tool Call [failed]: Shell: cat pyproject.toml && .ve...v/null | grep -i flagrant
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:20:12
+
+```
+[project]
+name = "flagrant-client"
+version = "0.1.0"
+description = "Add your description here"
+readme = "README.md"
+authors = [
+    { name = "Michal Buczko", email = "michal@buczko.pl" }
+]
+requires-python = ">=3.11"
+dependencies = []
+
+[build-system]
+requires = ["hatchling"]
+build-backend = "hatchling.build"
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:20:20)
+
+The package is not installed in .venv. Best options: install in editable mode with uv, then import in ipython. Or set PYTHONPATH. Give concise answer.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 10:20:20)
+
+The package isn't installed in your `.venv` yet, so install it in editable mode first:
+
+```bash
+uv pip install -e .
+```
+
+Then, in IPython (make sure you're using the venv's interpreter: `.venv/bin/ipython` or `uv run ipython`):
+
+```python
+from flagrant_client import hello
+hello()  # "Hello from flagrant-client!"
+```
+
+**Alternative without installing** — since this project uses the `src` layout, just add `src` to the path inside IPython:
+
+```python
+import sys; sys.path.insert(0, "src")
+from flagrant_client import hello
+```
+
+Or launch IPython with `PYTHONPATH=src uv run ipython`.
+
+The editable install is the better long-term option — changes to the source code will be picked up immediately (use IPython's `%load_ext autoreload` + `%autoreload 2` for live reloading during development).
+
+## User (2026-08-11 10:41:40)
+
+I would like to implement a python client for my flagrant (feature-flagging) service. The service has only one public endpoint: /api/v1/projects/:project/envs/:environment/features where both `:project` and `:environment` should be provided as the parameters. The client should we contructed so, that we could provide a service address and a bunch of other parameter in a future (like cache TTL). When called, expect the JSON as the result. We will turn it into a proper python models in a next step.
+
+src/flagrant_client/client.py:4-3
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:41:45)
+
+The user wants a client implementation. Let me look at the current state of the project, particularly src/flagrant_client/client.py and __init__.py.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: ls src/flagrant_client/ &...agrant_client/__init__.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:41:55
+
+```
+__init__.py
+__pycache__
+client.py
+py.typed
+def hello() -> str:
+    return "Hello from flagrant-client!"
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:42:01)
+
+client.py exists but is empty (or nearly). Let me design a simple client:
+
+- Class `FlagrantClient` with constructor taking `base_url` (service address), and optional params like `timeout`, future: `cache_ttl`. Actually the user said "a bunch of other parameters in a future (like cache TTL)" — so design constructor extensible. Keep it simple: `FlagrantClient(base_url: str, timeout: float = 5.0)`.
+- Method to fetch features: `get_features(project, environment) -> dict` hitting `/api/v1/projects/{project}/envs/{environment}/features`, returns JSON dict.
+
+HTTP library choice: `httpx` or `requests`? For a modern client, `httpx` is nice. Check if uv is available and add dependency. Keep simple — use httpx.
+
+Should I enter plan mode? This is a small, single-file feature. The requirements are fairly clear. I'll just implement it. Minimal changes: client.py implementation, update __init__.py exports? Keep hello() or remove? Keep it, maybe leave as is — minimal changes. I'll add the client and export it in __init__.
+
+Then test with a mock — quick test using a local stub. I can test URL construction by monkeypatching or running a tiny HTTP server. Simplest: test with a small Python script that starts a local http.server and calls the client.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 10:42:10)
+
+I'll implement a simple HTTP client for the service. Using `httpx` as the HTTP library:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: uv add httpx
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:42:19
+
+```
+Resolved 8 packages in 357ms
+   Building flagrant-client @ file:///Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client
+      Built flagrant-client @ file:///Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client
+Prepared 5 packages in 495ms
+Uninstalled 1 package in 0.87ms
+Installed 8 packages in 7ms
+ + anyio==4.14.2
+ + certifi==2026.7.22
+ ~ flagrant-client==0.1.0 (from file:///Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client)
+ + h11==0.16.0
+ + httpcore==1.0.9
+ + httpx==0.28.1
+ + idna==3.18
+ + typing-extensions==4.16.0
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:42:29)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: WriteFile: src/flagrant_client/client.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:43:10
+
+```
+╭───────────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant_client/client.py │
+╰───────────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,2 +1,33 @@
+-def hello() -> str:
+-    return "Hello from flagrant-client!"
++from typing import Any
++
++import httpx
++
++
++class FlagrantClient:
++    def __init__(
++        self,
++        base_url: str,
++        *,
++        timeout: float = 5.0,
++        cache_ttl: float | None = None,
++    ) -> None:
++        self.base_url = base_url.rstrip("/")
++        self.timeout = timeout
++        self.cache_ttl = cache_ttl
++        self._http = httpx.Client(base_url=self.base_url, timeout=timeout)
++
++    def get_features(self, project: str, environment: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
++        response = self._http.get(
++            f"/api/v1/projects/{project}/envs/{environment}/features"
++        )
++        response.raise_for_status()
++        return response.json()
++
++    def close(self) -> None:
++        self._http.close()
++
++    def __enter__(self) -> "FlagrantClient":
++        return self
++
++    def __exit__(self, *args: Any) -> None:
++        self.close()
+
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:43:16)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [failed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant_client/__init__.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:43:18
+
+```
+No replacements were made. The old string was not found in the file.
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:43:27)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: ReadFile: src/flagrant_client/__init__.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:43:27
+
+```
+No lines read from file. Total lines in file: 0. End of file reached.
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:43:33)
+
+The __init__.py is now empty (the earlier hello() was apparently removed, or the file was overwritten). Write the export.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: WriteFile: src/flagrant_client/__init__.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:43:43
+
+```
+╭─────────────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant_client/__init__.py │
+╰─────────────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
++from flagrant_client.client import FlagrantClient
++
++__all__ = ["FlagrantClient"]
+
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:43:49)
+
+
+## Agent (2026-08-11 10:43:49)
+
+Now let me verify it works against a stub server:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...features" print("OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:44:17
+
+```
+{
+  "path": "/api/v1/projects/my-project/envs/production/features",
+  "features": {
+    "dark_mode": true
+  }
+}
+OK
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:44:34)
+
+
+## Agent (2026-08-11 10:44:34)
+
+Done. Here's what I implemented in `src/flagrant_client/client.py`:
+
+```python
+class FlagrantClient:
+    def __init__(self, base_url: str, *, timeout: float = 5.0,
+                 cache_ttl: float | None = None) -> None: ...
+
+    def get_features(self, project: str, environment: str) -> dict[str, Any]: ...
+
+    def close(self) -> None: ...
+```
+
+Key design points:
+
+- **`base_url`** — the service address is the only required constructor parameter. `timeout` and `cache_ttl` are keyword-only args, so adding more options later (retries, auth headers, etc.) won't break the API. `cache_ttl` is accepted but not used yet.
+- **`get_features(project, environment)`** — hits `/api/v1/projects/:project/envs/:environment/features` and returns the raw parsed JSON as a dict, ready to be mapped to proper models in the next step.
+- Uses a single reused `httpx.Client` internally (connection pooling), with `close()` and context-manager support (`with FlagrantClient(...) as client:`).
+- Exported via `from flagrant_client import FlagrantClient`, verified against a local stub server, and `httpx` was added as a dependency with `uv add httpx`.
+
+One note: `src/flagrant_client/__init__.py` was empty when I checked it (the old `hello()` function was gone), so I just added the export there. Next step — parsing the JSON into typed models — we can do with `pydantic` or plain dataclasses whenever you're ready.
+
+## User (2026-08-11 10:53:12)
+
+why I can't import it via `import flagrant.client as c` ?
+
+src/flagrant/client.py:6-6
+
+class FlagrantClient:
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:53:20)
+
+The user is trying `import flagrant.client` but the package is named `flagrant_client` (with underscore). The import name is the directory name `src/flagrant_client/`, not the distribution name. Also note the user's reference says `src/flagrant/client.py` — did they rename the directory? Let me check.
+
+### Tool Call [failed]: Shell: ls src/ && ls src/flagrant_client/ 2>/dev/null
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:53:23
+
+```
+flagrant
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:53:28)
+
+Interesting — the user renamed `src/flagrant_client` to `src/flagrant`. Now the package directory is `src/flagrant`, but `client.py` exists there per user's reference (src/flagrant/client.py line 6 `class FlagrantClient:`). Wait, `ls src/flagrant_client/` failed. Let me check contents of src/flagrant.
+
+The issue: the installed package in .venv was installed as editable earlier via `uv add httpx` — it built flagrant-client. The editable install likely points to `src/flagrant_client` which no longer exists. Also hatchling build config: with src layout, hatchling auto-detects packages under src. Editable install may be stale.
+
+Let me check what's in src/flagrant and whether import fails.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: ls src/flagrant/ && .venv...nt.client" 2>&1 | tail -5
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:53:42
+
+```
+__init__.py
+__pycache__
+client.py
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:53:50)
+
+Interesting — the import worked (no error output, exit 0). Wait, the command executed successfully and no error tail printed. So `import flagrant.client` actually works now? But the user says they can't import it. Maybe their IPython REPL was started before the rename, or the editable install points to the old location.
+
+Let me check the editable install. Earlier `uv add httpx` installed the project editable... Actually it built it as a regular (non-editable?) install: "Built flagrant-client @ file://..." — with hatchling, uv pip install of the project in `uv add` installs the project — typically editable? Actually `uv add` installs the project in editable mode by default? No — `uv add` adds dependencies and syncs the project; the project itself is installed in editable mode by default in uv (yes, uv installs the current project as editable by default).
+
+The build happened when the directory was still `src/flagrant_client`? The listing earlier showed `src/flagrant_client/` with client.py. Now it's `src/flagrant`. So the user renamed it after. The editable install may have a stale path hook pointing to src/flagrant_client... but the import just worked. Maybe the __editable__ pth points to src directory, so `flagrant` works.
+
+But wait — there may also be a stale `flagrant_client` in site-packages from the editable finder. Let me test both imports and check the pth files. Also the user's IPython session may have the old module cached, or they get ModuleNotFoundError. Also possibly the user is running a REPL from a different env.
+
+Let me check: .venv/lib/python*/site-packages for __editable__ files.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: ls .venv/lib/python*/site...py 2>/dev/null | head -20
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:54:11
+
+```
+_editable_impl_flagrant_client.pth
+flagrant_client-0.1.0.dist-info
+---
+/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/src
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:54:22)
+
+The .pth file just adds `/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/src` to sys.path. So any package inside `src/` is importable. The user renamed `flagrant_client` → `flagrant`, and `import flagrant.client` works in a fresh interpreter (I verified above — it succeeded).
+
+So why can't the user import it? Most likely:
+1. Their IPython REPL was started before the rename, so the old path or stale `__pycache__` is an issue — actually no, .pth points to src dir which is stable. If their REPL started before `uv add httpx` ran, the .pth wouldn't be loaded in that session.
+2. They might be running `ipython` that isn't from this .venv.
+3. There's a stale `flagrant_client/__pycache__`? No — src/flagrant_client no longer exists.
+
+Actually, wait — my test `import flagrant.client` succeeded. So the import works now in a fresh interpreter. The most likely cause: their IPython session was started before the editable install (.pth) existed, or they're using the wrong interpreter.
+
+Let me verify ipython works: check .venv/bin/ipython exists and test import in it.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: ls .venv/bin/ | grep -i -...nt_client" 2>&1 | tail -2
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:54:59
+
+```
+python
+python3
+python3.11
+<class 'flagrant.client.FlagrantClient'>
+  File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
+ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'flagrant_client'
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:55:05)
+
+So `import flagrant.client as c` works fine in a fresh interpreter from the venv. The user can't import it — the likely reasons:
+
+1. Their IPython REPL was started before the rename / before the editable install, so it doesn't see the new package. Solution: restart the REPL.
+2. They're running a different `ipython` (not from `.venv`). There's no ipython in .venv/bin at all! So they're running a global ipython which doesn't know about the .venv.
+
+That's the key finding: `.venv/bin/` has no ipython. So if they run plain `ipython`, it's a different interpreter that doesn't have the project installed.
+
+Also note: `flagrant_client` no longer imports because the directory was renamed to `flagrant`. That's expected.
+
+So the answer: the import works, but you need to run IPython with the venv's interpreter. Options:
+- Install ipython as dev dependency: `uv add --dev ipython`, then `uv run ipython`.
+- Or restart existing REPL if it was started before install.
+
+Should I install ipython? The user asked "why can't I import" — a question. I'll explain and offer the fix. I could just install ipython as a dev dependency since that's clearly what they need — but it's a question, so explain first, offer command. Given "treat as task" guidance — the question is "why can't I import". Explaining + giving the command is appropriate; installing ipython as dev dep is a small, helpful action. I'll do it: `uv add --dev ipython`. That makes `uv run ipython` work. That seems within scope since they were asking about importing in ipython REPL earlier.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 10:55:16)
+
+Found it — two things are going on:
+
+**1. The import actually works now, but only in the project's venv.** I just verified:
+
+```
+.venv/bin/python -c "import flagrant.client as c"  →  OK
+```
+
+**2. There's no `ipython` in your `.venv`.** Look at `.venv/bin/` — it only contains `python`, `python3`, `python3.11`. So when you type `ipython`, you're launching a **global** IPython with a different interpreter, which has no idea about this project's editable install.
+
+Additionally, since you renamed the package directory from `flagrant_client` → `flagrant`, the old name no longer imports either (`import flagrant_client` now fails) — only `flagrant` exists.
+
+The fix — install IPython into the project as a dev dependency:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: uv add --dev ipython 2>&1...-no-banner 2>&1 | tail -3
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:56:32
+
+```
+environment.
+  help: If you want to add the package regardless of the failed resolution,
+        provide the `--frozen` flag to skip locking and syncing.
+/bin/bash: .venv/bin/ipython: No such file or directory
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:56:40)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: uv add --dev ipython 2>&1 | tail -15
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:56:43
+
+```
+At least one file selection option must be defined
+      in the `tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel` table, see:
+      https://hatch.pypa.io/latest/config/build/
+
+      As an example, if you intend to ship a directory named `foo` that
+      resides within a `src` directory located at the root of your project,
+      you can define the following:
+
+      [tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel]
+      packages = ["src/foo"]
+
+      hint: This usually indicates a problem with the package or the build
+      environment.
+  help: If you want to add the package regardless of the failed resolution,
+        provide the `--frozen` flag to skip locking and syncing.
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:56:52)
+
+The rename broke the hatchling build: the project name is `flagrant-client`, and hatchling's default wheel target looks for `src/flagrant_client` (normalized name), which no longer exists since the directory is now `src/flagrant`. Need to add to pyproject.toml:
+
+```toml
+[tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel]
+packages = ["src/flagrant"]
+```
+
+Then retry `uv add --dev ipython`.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: StrReplaceFile: pyproject.toml
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:57:14
+
+```
+╭────────────────╮
+│ pyproject.toml │
+╰────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
+     "httpx>=0.28.1",
+ ]
+ 
++[tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel]
++packages = ["src/flagrant"]
++
+ [build-system]
+ requires = ["hatchling"]
+ build-backend = "hatchling.build"
+
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:57:26)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: uv add --dev ipython 2>&1...-no-banner 2>&1 | tail -2
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:57:35
+
+```
++ stack-data==0.6.3
+ + traitlets==5.16.1
+ + wcwidth==0.8.2
+
+In [2]: Do you really want to exit ([y]/n)?
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:57:42)
+
+The echo piped to ipython triggered the exit prompt instead of executing? It printed the prompt because stdin closed. The import line didn't print output. Let me test with -c instead.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/ipython --no-ba... print(c.FlagrantClient)"
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 10:58:31
+
+```
+<class 'flagrant.client.FlagrantClient'>
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 10:58:39)
+
+
+## Agent (2026-08-11 10:58:39)
+
+Fixed and verified. Two fixes were needed:
+
+1. **`pyproject.toml`** — after renaming the package dir to `flagrant`, hatchling couldn't find what to build, so I added:
+   ```toml
+   [tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel]
+   packages = ["src/flagrant"]
+   ```
+
+2. **Installed IPython into the project venv** (`uv add --dev ipython`), since `.venv` didn't have it — your `ipython` command was using a global interpreter without access to the project.
+
+Now just run the REPL via the venv:
+
+```bash
+uv run ipython
+```
+
+and import it:
+
+```python
+import flagrant.client as c
+c.FlagrantClient("http://localhost:4000")
+```
+
+Note: since the package was renamed, use `flagrant` (not `flagrant_client`) in imports going forward. If you ever touch the package name again, restart the REPL — it caches the import state from when it started.
+
+## User (2026-08-11 11:04:26)
+
+let's move project into a constructor and add one more parameter here - identity, which will be passed in request as X-Flagrant-Identity header.
+
+src/flagrant/client.py:19-19
+
+    def get_features(self, project: str, environment: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:04:30)
+
+Move `project` into the constructor, add `identity` parameter sent as `X-Flagrant-Identity` header. Environment stays in get_features presumably (they only said move project). So constructor: base_url, project, identity, timeout, cache_ttl. get_features(environment).
+
+identity — passed in request as header. Should identity be required? "add one more parameter here - identity". I'll make it required like project? Or optional? Probably required-ish, but keep it simple: make it a keyword or positional. I'll put project and identity as required params after base_url. Keep minimal.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: WriteFile: src/flagrant/client.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:05:54
+
+```
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/client.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,18 +1,26 @@
+     def __init__(
+         self,
+         base_url: str,
++        project: str,
++        identity: str,
+         *,
+         timeout: float = 5.0,
+         cache_ttl: float | None = None,
+     ) -> None:
+         self.base_url = base_url.rstrip("/")
++        self.project = project
++        self.identity = identity
+         self.timeout = timeout
+         self.cache_ttl = cache_ttl
+-        self._http = httpx.Client(base_url=self.base_url, timeout=timeout)
++        self._http = httpx.Client(
++            base_url=self.base_url,
++            timeout=timeout,
++            headers={"X-Flagrant-Identity": identity},
++        )
+ 
+-    def get_features(self, project: str, environment: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
++    def get_features(self, environment: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
+         response = self._http.get(
+-            f"/api/v1/projects/{project}/envs/{environment}/features"
++            f"/api/v1/projects/{self.project}/envs/{environment}/features"
+         )
+         response.raise_for_status()
+         return response.json()
+
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:06:00)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...user-123" print("OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:06:08
+
+```
+{
+  "path": "/api/v1/projects/my-project/envs/production/features",
+  "identity": "user-123",
+  "features": {
+    "dark_mode": true
+  }
+}
+OK
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:06:15)
+
+
+## Agent (2026-08-11 11:06:15)
+
+Done and verified. Changes to `FlagrantClient`:
+
+- **`project` moved to the constructor** — `get_features()` now takes only `environment`.
+- **`identity` added to the constructor** — sent automatically as the `X-Flagrant-Identity` header on every request (set once on the underlying `httpx.Client`).
+
+New usage:
+
+```python
+with FlagrantClient("http://localhost:4000", "my-project", "user-123") as client:
+    features = client.get_features("production")
+```
+
+The stub-server test confirms both the URL path (`/api/v1/projects/my-project/envs/production/features`) and that the `X-Flagrant-Identity: user-123` header arrives at the server.
+
+## User (2026-08-11 11:07:46)
+
+it's wrong - identity needs to be provided as an arg for get_features function
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:07:52)
+
+Move identity from constructor to get_features argument. Keep project in constructor (that was the previous request and they didn't revert it). So get_features(identity, environment)? Order — "identity needs to be provided as an arg for get_features". Keep environment too. I'll do `get_features(environment: str, identity: str)`? Or identity first? Environment was existing param; adding identity — put it after environment to minimize breakage: `get_features(environment, identity)`. Header set per-request.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant/client.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:08:18
+
+```
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/client.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,25 +1,20 @@
+         self,
+         base_url: str,
+         project: str,
+-        identity: str,
+         *,
+         timeout: float = 5.0,
+         cache_ttl: float | None = None,
+     ) -> None:
+         self.base_url = base_url.rstrip("/")
+         self.project = project
+-        self.identity = identity
+         self.timeout = timeout
+         self.cache_ttl = cache_ttl
+-        self._http = httpx.Client(
+-            base_url=self.base_url,
+-            timeout=timeout,
+-            headers={"X-Flagrant-Identity": identity},
+-        )
++        self._http = httpx.Client(base_url=self.base_url, timeout=timeout)
+ 
+-    def get_features(self, environment: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
++    def get_features(self, environment: str, identity: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
+         response = self._http.get(
+-            f"/api/v1/projects/{self.project}/envs/{environment}/features"
++            f"/api/v1/projects/{self.project}/envs/{environment}/features",
++            headers={"X-Flagrant-Identity": identity},
+         )
+         response.raise_for_status()
+         return response.json()
+
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:08:25)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...user-123" print("OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:08:35
+
+```
+{
+  "path": "/api/v1/projects/my-project/envs/production/features",
+  "identity": "user-123",
+  "features": {
+    "dark_mode": true
+  }
+}
+OK
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:08:40)
+
+
+## Agent (2026-08-11 11:08:40)
+
+Fixed. Now:
+
+- **Constructor** takes `base_url` and `project` only (plus optional `timeout`/`cache_ttl`).
+- **`get_features(environment, identity)`** — identity is passed per-call and sent as the `X-Flagrant-Identity` request header.
+
+```python
+with FlagrantClient("http://localhost:4000", "my-project") as client:
+    features = client.get_features("production", "user-123")
+```
+
+Verified against the stub server — the header arrives correctly per request, so a single client instance can now evaluate features for different identities.
+
+## User (2026-08-11 11:28:58)
+
+ok, let's create now a simple model for a Feature. it should consist of feature_id, name, and value. value is provided in response as a map: {type: value} where type is either text (should be then typed as str) or json or toml. use pedantic describe the model.
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:29:04)
+
+The user wants a pydantic model for Feature: feature_id, name, value. Value comes as a map `{type: value}` where type is "text" (→ str), "json", or "toml". Use pydantic.
+
+Design: use a discriminated union on the value type. Something like:
+
+```python
+from typing import Annotated, Any, Literal, Union
+from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
+
+class TextValue(BaseModel):
+    type: Literal["text"]
+    value: str
+
+class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+    type: Literal["json"]
+    value: Any  # dict/list presumably
+
+class TomlValue(BaseModel):
+    type: Literal["toml"]
+    value: str  # raw toml string? or parsed?
+
+FeatureValue = Annotated[Union[TextValue, JsonValue, TomlValue], Field(discriminator="type")]
+
+class Feature(BaseModel):
+    feature_id: str
+    name: str
+    value: FeatureValue
+```
+
+Question: what shape does the JSON value have in response — `{type: value}` — i.e., the value map itself has keys "text"/"json"/"toml"? "value is provided in response as a map: {type: value} where type is either text...". So response like:
+
+```json
+{"feature_id": "...", "name": "...", "value": {"text": "hello"}}
+```
+
+or `{"json": {...}}` or `{"toml": "..."}`. So the map key is the type name, not a literal "type" key. So discriminated union on a "type" field won't directly work. Need a root model with a single key. Options:
+
+```python
+class FeatureValue(RootModel):
+    root: dict[...]?
+```
+
+Simpler: use a model with optional fields or a BeforeValidator that transforms `{"text": "hello"}` into a discriminated form. Or:
+
+```python
+FeatureValue = Annotated[
+    Union[TextValue, JsonValue, TomlValue],
+    ...
+]
+```
+
+where each variant parses its own key? Can't directly.
+
+Cleanest approach: a RootModel wrapping a dict constrained to one key? Or use a validator:
+
+```python
+class Feature(BaseModel):
+    feature_id: str
+    name: str
+    value: TextValue | JsonValue | TomlValue
+
+    @field_validator("value", mode="before")
+    @classmethod
+    def normalize(cls, v): 
+        # v = {"text": "hello"} -> {"type": "text", "value": "hello"}
+```
+
+But discriminated union needs discriminator field present. Use Field(discriminator="type") with Annotated union, and before-validator converting. Or simpler without discriminator — plain union with smart mode; pydantic will try each variant.
+
+Alternative much simpler: 
+
+```python
+class FeatureValue(BaseModel):
+    text: str | None = None
+    json: Any = None  # conflict with BaseModel.json method? pydantic v2 warns about field named "json"
+    toml: str | None = None
+```
+
+Field named `json` conflicts with deprecated BaseModel.json in v1; in pydantic v2 field named "json" shadows nothing? In v2, `model_json`... Actually in pydantic v2, having a field named "json" is allowed but shadows the deprecated `json()` method — it raises a warning? In pydantic v2, fields that shadow BaseModel attributes raise NameError at class definition. `json` is a deprecated method in v2 (still exists on BaseModel). Defining field "json" would conflict. Use alias: `json_: Any = Field(alias="json")`.
+
+I think the before-validator + discriminated union is cleanest and most idiomatic. Let me write:
+
+```python
+from typing import Annotated, Any, Literal
+
+from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, field_validator
+
+
+class TextValue(BaseModel):
+    type: Literal["text"]
+    value: str
+
+
+class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+    type: Literal["json"]
+    value: Any
+
+
+class TomlValue(BaseModel):
+    type: Literal["toml"]
+    value: str
+
+
+FeatureValue = Annotated[
+    TextValue | JsonValue | TomlValue,
+    Field(discriminator="type"),
+]
+
+
+class Feature(BaseModel):
+    feature_id: str
+    name: str
+    value: FeatureValue
+
+    @field_validator("value", mode="before")
+    @classmethod
+    def _expand_value(cls, v: Any) -> Any:
+        if isinstance(v, dict) and len(v) == 1:
+            type_, value = next(iter(v.items()))
+            return {"type": type_, "value": value}
+        return v
+```
+
+For toml value — should it be the raw string, or parsed into a dict? The user said "json or toml" types, with text typed as str. Probably toml value is a string containing TOML (or a map?). Keep it simple: toml → str? Hmm. JSON value would naturally be Any (parsed JSON). TOML can't be embedded as parsed data in JSON easily, so likely it's a TOML string. I'll type toml as str (raw TOML text) and note that. Actually maybe keep both json: Any and toml: str. Mention the assumption to the user.
+
+Also should get_features return models now? The user said earlier "We will turn it into a proper python models in a next step" and now asks to create the model. They didn't explicitly ask to wire it into client. Keep minimal: just create models module. Maybe ask? No — be decisive: create `src/flagrant/models.py` with the Feature model. Don't wire into client yet unless asked — but it might be natural. The user said "let's create now a simple model for a Feature" — just the model. I'll create models.py and test parsing. Not modify client.
+
+Add pydantic dependency: uv add pydantic.
+
+For toml value type — I'll go with `str`. Mention assumption.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: uv add pydantic 2>&1 | tail -2
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:29:47
+
+```
++ pydantic-core==2.46.4
+ + typing-inspection==0.4.3
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:29:53)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: WriteFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:30:32
+
+```
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
++from typing import Annotated, Any, Literal
++
++from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, field_validator
++
++
++class TextValue(BaseModel):
++    type: Literal["text"]
++    value: str
++
++
++class JsonValue(BaseModel):
++    type: Literal["json"]
++    value: Any
++
++
++class TomlValue(BaseModel):
++    type: Literal["toml"]
++    value: str
++
++
++FeatureValue = Annotated[
++    TextValue | JsonValue | TomlValue,
++    Field(discriminator="type"),
++]
++
++
++class Feature(BaseModel):
++    feature_id: str
++    name: str
++    value: FeatureValue
++
++    @field_validator("value", mode="before")
++    @classmethod
++    def _expand_value(cls, v: Any) -> Any:
++        # The API sends the value as a single-key map: {"text": "..."},
++        # {"json": {...}} or {"toml": "..."}. Expand it into a
++        # {"type": ..., "value": ...} pair so the discriminated union works.
++        if isinstance(v, dict) and len(v) == 1:
++            type_, value = next(iter(v.items()))
++            return {"type": type_, "value": value}
++        return v
+
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:30:39)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...wn type rejected OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:30:53
+
+```
+TextValue -> 'hello'
+JsonValue -> {'max': 10}
+TomlValue -> 'max = 10'
+unknown type rejected OK
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:30:58)
+
+Works. Note assumption: toml value typed as str (raw TOML text), json as Any (parsed). Explain briefly.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 11:30:58)
+
+Created `src/flagrant/models.py` with pydantic models:
+
+```python
+class Feature(BaseModel):
+    feature_id: str
+    name: str
+    value: FeatureValue   # TextValue | JsonValue | TomlValue (discriminated by "type")
+```
+
+How it works:
+
+- Since the API sends the value as a **single-key map** like `{"text": "hello"}` (not `{"type": "text", "value": "hello"}`), a `mode="before"` validator expands that map into a `type`/`value` pair, which then feeds a standard pydantic **discriminated union**.
+- `text` → `str`, `json` → `Any` (kept as parsed JSON structure), `toml` → `str` (raw TOML text — I assumed the API embeds TOML as a string; we can parse it with `tomllib` later if needed).
+- Unknown value types are rejected with a `ValidationError`.
+
+Verified parsing of all three variants plus rejection of an unknown type (`yaml`). Not wired into `FlagrantClient.get_features()` yet — say the word if you want it to return `list[Feature]` instead of raw JSON.
+
+## User (2026-08-11 11:31:32)
+
+> Verified parsing of all three variants plus rejection of an unknown type (yaml). Not wired into FlagrantClient.get_features() yet — say the word if you want it to return list[Feature] instead of raw JSON.
+
+yes, let's now wire it into get_features function
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:31:36)
+
+Wire models into get_features. The endpoint returns JSON — what's the shape? Presumably a list of features, or maybe an object containing features. Earlier stub returned `{"features": {...}}`. Unknown actual shape. The endpoint is `/features` so likely a list of feature objects. Keep simple: parse the response JSON as a list of Feature. But maybe the response wraps it, e.g. `{"features": [...]}`. I don't know. I'll assume top-level JSON array of features and use TypeAdapter(list[Feature]). Mention the assumption.
+
+Update client.py.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant/client.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:31:56
+
+```
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/client.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
+ from typing import Any
+ 
+ import httpx
++from pydantic import TypeAdapter
+ 
++from flagrant.models import Feature
+ 
++_features_adapter = TypeAdapter(list[Feature])
++
++
+ class FlagrantClient:
+
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/client.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
+         self.cache_ttl = cache_ttl
+         self._http = httpx.Client(base_url=self.base_url, timeout=timeout)
+ 
+-    def get_features(self, environment: str, identity: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
++    def get_features(self, environment: str, identity: str) -> list[Feature]:
+         response = self._http.get(
+             f"/api/v1/projects/{self.project}/envs/{environment}/features",
+             headers={"X-Flagrant-Identity": identity},
+         )
+         response.raise_for_status()
+-        return response.json()
++        return _features_adapter.validate_python(response.json())
+ 
+     def close(self) -> None:
+         self._http.close()
+
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:32:03)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...= "hello" print("OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:32:28
+
+```
+f1 greeting TextValue 'hello'
+f2 limits JsonValue {'max': 10}
+f3 config TomlValue 'max = 10'
+OK
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:32:34)
+
+
+## Agent (2026-08-11 11:32:34)
+
+Wired up. `get_features` now returns `list[Feature]`:
+
+```python
+def get_features(self, environment: str, identity: str) -> list[Feature]:
+    ...
+    return _features_adapter.validate_python(response.json())
+```
+
+- Uses a module-level `TypeAdapter(list[Feature])` (created once, not per-call) to validate the response.
+- Verified end-to-end against the stub server: all three value variants parse into their typed models.
+
+One assumption to confirm: I parse the response body as a **top-level JSON array** of feature objects. If your API actually wraps it (e.g. `{"features": [...]}`), let me know and I'll adjust the adapter to extract the key first.
+
+## User (2026-08-11 11:37:17)
+
+I think we have a problem with validation. the call now fails with:
+```
+ValidationError: 1 validation error for list[Feature]
+0.feature_id
+  Input should be a valid string [type=string_type, input_value=1, input_type=int]
+    For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/string_type
+```
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:37:22)
+
+The API returns feature_id as an int (1), but the model expects str. Pydantic v2 strict-ish: by default, int → str coercion is not allowed in "smart" mode (lax mode allows str→int but not int→str). Options: type feature_id as `int | str`, or coerce. What is feature_id actually? The user defined the model as feature_id: str earlier. The API returns an int. Best: keep str in model but coerce? Or change model to accept int? 
+
+Simplest correct fix: change `feature_id: str` to accept ints — but the cleaner domain choice: feature_id is likely an integer ID from the service. The user explicitly said the model "should consist of feature_id, name, and value" — didn't specify types originally; I chose str. The API returns int. Two options:
+
+1. `feature_id: int` — trust the API.
+2. `feature_id: str` with coercion via `Field(...)` and BeforeValidator str().
+
+I think changing to `int` is most faithful to the API. But maybe sometimes it's a string UUID in other responses? Unknown. I'll go with `str | int`? That preserves flexibility... but then downstream typing is awkward. 
+
+Decisive: the API returns an int → type it as `int`. Minimal change. Mention that if IDs can also be strings, we can coerce to str instead.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 11:37:33)
+
+The API returns `feature_id` as an integer (`1`), but I typed it as `str` — and pydantic v2 won't implicitly coerce `int` → `str`. Since the service actually sends an int, let's type it as one:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:37:43
+
+```
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
+ 
+ 
+ class Feature(BaseModel):
+-    feature_id: str
++    feature_id: int
+     name: str
+     value: FeatureValue
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:37:47)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...e_id == 1 print("OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:37:51
+
+```
+1 int greeting hello
+OK
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:37:54)
+
+
+## Agent (2026-08-11 11:37:54)
+
+Fixed — `feature_id` is now typed as `int`, matching what the API actually returns.
+
+One thing to keep in mind: pydantic v2 still *will* coerce a JSON string like `"1"` → `int` automatically, so this stays compatible if the service ever serializes IDs as quoted numbers. But if IDs can genuinely be non-numeric strings (e.g. UUIDs) in some contexts, tell me and I'll switch it to `int | str` or coerce everything to `str` instead.
+
+## User (2026-08-11 11:40:16)
+
+can w have a value returned as TextValue('sepia') rather as TextValue(type='text', value='sepia')? same with all 2 other types (JsonValue and TomlValue)
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:40:21)
+
+The user wants `TextValue('sepia')` — i.e., positional construction with just the value, and repr presumably `TextValue('sepia')` rather than `TextValue(type='text', value='sepia')`. Actually they say "returned as TextValue('sepia')" — likely they mean the repr/constructor. In pydantic, positional init isn't supported for BaseModel (pydantic v2 models are keyword-only... actually pydantic v2 doesn't support positional args at all). 
+
+They probably want the repr to be `TextValue('sepia')` and simpler access. Options:
+
+1. Use `RootModel` subclasses:
+```python
+class TextValue(RootModel[str]):
+    root: str
+```
+Then repr is `TextValue(root='sepia')` — still not `TextValue('sepia')`. Hmm, actually RootModel repr is `TextValue(root='sepia')`. Not quite.
+
+2. Keep models but customize `__repr__` and `__init__`:
+
+```python
+class TextValue(BaseModel):
+    type: Literal["text"] = "text"
+    value: str
+
+    def __init__(self, value=None, **data): ...
+```
+
+Simpler: give `type` a default and customize `__repr__`:
+
+```python
+class TextValue(BaseModel):
+    type: Literal["text"] = "text"
+    value: str
+
+    def __repr__(self):
+        return f"{type(self).__name__}({self.value!r})"
+```
+
+But construction `TextValue('sepia')` positionally still fails in pydantic v2 ("__init__() takes exactly 1 positional argument"). Need custom __init__ accepting positional value:
+
+```python
+def __init__(self, value: str = ..., **data):
+    super().__init__(value=value, **data)
+```
+
+Wait — but validation from API comes as {"type": "text", "value": ...} after the before-validator expansion. If we make __init__ accept positional value, model_validate with dict still works since __init__ receives kwargs... Actually model_validate in pydantic v2 doesn't call __init__ with dict directly? It does call the class constructor ultimately (ModelMetaclass __call__ → __init__). Custom __init__ that accepts **data and passes through works.
+
+Better approach: maybe keep discriminated union parsing but restructure: value field holds the raw value, and the model determines type. Alternative simpler design: make Feature.value just the raw value with type info attached? User explicitly wants TextValue/JsonValue/TomlValue classes.
+
+Simplest implementation achieving `TextValue('sepia')` both in repr and constructor:
+
+```python
+class TextValue(BaseModel):
+    type: Literal["text"] = "text"
+    value: str
+
+    def __init__(self, value: Any = None, **data: Any) -> None:
+        if value is not None:
+            data["value"] = value
+        super().__init__(**data)
+
+    def __repr__(self) -> str:
+        return f"{type(self).__name__}({self.value!r})"
+```
+
+Hmm, careful: repr of str 'sepia' gives 'sepia' with quotes — matches TextValue('sepia'). Good.
+
+For JsonValue, value: Any; repr `JsonValue({'a': 1})`. Fine.
+
+Alternatively use dataclasses-style with pydantic RootModel... I'll go with custom __init__ + __repr__.
+
+Edge: `TextValue(value='sepia')` still works. `TextValue(type='text', value='sepia')` works via **data. Good — discriminated union validation from before-validator (which passes dict with type+value) still works.
+
+But wait — does the discriminated union call the custom __init__? Validation goes through core schema, then calls the class. The dict {"type": "text", "value": "sepia"} → validator calls TextValue(type="text", value="sepia")? In pydantic v2, model validation constructs via `cls(**validated_dict)`? It actually calls `cls.__init__(**fields)`? I believe model_validate ends up calling the class with kwargs, so custom __init__ with **data works. Let me just implement and test.
+
+Also, `value: Any = None` default — for JsonValue, value could legitimately be None (json null). Then TextValue(None) wouldn't set data["value"]... but value is required; passing None positionally for JsonValue would then fail "value required". Edge case; use a sentinel instead:
+
+```python
+_SENTINEL = object()
+
+def __init__(self, value=_SENTINEL, **data):
+    if value is not _SENTINEL:
+        data["value"] = value
+    super().__init__(**data)
+```
+
+Use Pydantic's own? Fine with a module-level sentinel. Keep it simple.
+
+Type param for __init__ differs per class (str for Text/Toml, Any for Json) — minor; just annotate appropriately.
+
+Write the code, test all three: construction positional, repr, model_validate from API shape, Feature parsing.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 11:40:53)
+
+Yes — I'll give each value model a positional-friendly `__init__` and a compact `__repr__`:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: WriteFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:41:17
+
+```
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,20 +1,46 @@
+ 
+ from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, field_validator
+ 
++_UNSET = object()
+ 
++
+ class TextValue(BaseModel):
+-    type: Literal["text"]
++    type: Literal["text"] = "text"
+     value: str
+ 
++    def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
++        if value is not _UNSET:
++            data["value"] = value
++        super().__init__(**data)
+ 
++    def __repr__(self) -> str:
++        return f"{type(self).__name__}({self.value!r})"
++
++
+ class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+-    type: Literal["json"]
++    type: Literal["json"] = "json"
+     value: Any
+ 
++    def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
++        if value is not _UNSET:
++            data["value"] = value
++        super().__init__(**data)
+ 
++    def __repr__(self) -> str:
++        return f"{type(self).__name__}({self.value!r})"
++
++
+ class TomlValue(BaseModel):
+-    type: Literal["toml"]
++    type: Literal["toml"] = "toml"
+     value: str
+ 
++    def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
++        if value is not _UNSET:
++            data["value"] = value
++        super().__init__(**data)
+ 
++    def __repr__(self) -> str:
++        return f"{type(self).__name__}({self.value!r})"
++
++
+ FeatureValue = Annotated[
+
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:41:21)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...cted OK") print("OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:41:30
+
+```
+TextValue('sepia')
+JsonValue({'max': 10})
+TomlValue('max = 10')
+TextValue('sepia') JsonValue({'max': 10}) TomlValue('max = 10')
+unknown type rejected OK
+OK
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:41:35)
+
+Done. Note the repetition across the three classes — could be reduced with a shared base class, but keep it simple; maybe mention it. Actually a small base class would be cleaner... The user asked for minimal; I'll mention the option briefly.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 11:41:36)
+
+Done. Now all three value types support both forms:
+
+```python
+TextValue('sepia')        # positional
+JsonValue({'max': 10})
+TomlValue('max = 10')
+
+repr(TextValue('sepia'))  # "TextValue('sepia')" — not TextValue(type='text', value='sepia')
+```
+
+How it works:
+
+- Each model has a custom `__init__` that accepts the value positionally (a `_UNSET` sentinel distinguishes "not passed" from `None`, so `JsonValue(None)` for JSON null still works).
+- A custom `__repr__` shows just the value.
+- `type` now defaults to its literal (e.g. `"text"`), so you never have to pass it by hand — but keyword construction (`TextValue(value="sepia")`) and API payload parsing via `Feature.model_validate(...)` both still work, and unknown types are still rejected.
+
+Everything verified: positional/keyword construction, reprs, all three API payload shapes, and rejection of unknown value types. If the duplicated `__init__`/`__repr__` boilerplate across the three classes bothers you, I can factor it into a shared base class — just say so.
+
+## User (2026-08-11 11:42:38)
+
+do we need to hold a type within a class? it's kind of redundant, isn't it?
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:42:43)
+
+The user asks: do we need the `type` field stored on the class? It's redundant since the class itself conveys the type. But we need the discriminator for parsing the union. Options:
+
+1. Keep `type` as a Literal field (current) — needed for pydantic's discriminated union.
+2. Remove the field from the model's data and use a different discrimination strategy: e.g., `Discriminator` with a callable, or `Tag` via pydantic's functional discriminator API, or plain union in "smart" mode (pydantic v2 smart union can distinguish by value type: str vs Any... TextValue(str) vs TomlValue(str) would be ambiguous — both str! So smart union can't distinguish text vs toml).
+
+Best approach: pydantic v2 supports callable discriminators:
+
+```python
+from pydantic import Discriminator, Tag
+
+def value_type(v): ...
+
+FeatureValue = Annotated[
+    Union[Annotated[TextValue, Tag("text")], ...],
+    Discriminator(value_type),
+]
+```
+
+But the models themselves: if we remove `type` field, then each model only has `value: str`. But TextValue and TomlValue would both be {value: str} — validation-wise indistinguishable. With callable discriminator we control which tag applies based on input dict's "type" key, so it works.
+
+Simpler alternative: since the before-validator in Feature already expands `{"text": "x"}` → `{"type": "text", "value": "x"}`, we could instead have it construct the right class directly? A before-validator returning an instance: mode="before" validator can return an already-constructed model instance and pydantic will accept it (for model fields, validators returning instance of the model pass through). E.g.:
+
+```python
+_VALUE_TYPES = {"text": TextValue, "json": JsonValue, "toml": TomlValue}
+
+@field_validator("value", mode="before")
+@classmethod
+def _expand_value(cls, v):
+    if isinstance(v, dict) and len(v) == 1:
+        type_, value = next(iter(v.items()))
+        model = _VALUE_TYPES.get(type_)
+        if model is None:
+            raise ValueError(f"unknown value type: {type_}")
+        return model(value)
+    return v
+```
+
+Then FeatureValue = TextValue | JsonValue | TomlValue (plain union). When validator returns a TextValue instance, pydantic validates it against the union — instance matches TextValue, fine. And serialization: model_dump would give {"value": ...}? Each value model dumps to {"value": "sepia"} without type. Do we need to serialize back to API format? Not currently (client only reads). Keep it simple.
+
+Also remove `type` field from the three models. That directly answers "do we need to hold a type within a class?" — No, the class itself is the type. The discriminator info is only needed at parse time, which we can handle in the validator.
+
+This removes redundancy. Also then __init__ custom... we still keep the positional init? Yes keep that from previous request.
+
+Could even make the classes non-pydantic dataclasses... but keep pydantic for value validation (str type check).
+
+Implement:
+
+```python
+class TextValue(BaseModel):
+    value: str
+    # __init__, __repr__ as before
+
+class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+    value: Any
+
+class TomlValue(BaseModel):
+    value: str
+
+FeatureValue = TextValue | JsonValue | TomlValue
+
+class Feature(BaseModel):
+    feature_id: int
+    name: str
+    value: FeatureValue
+
+    @field_validator("value", mode="before")
+    @classmethod
+    def _build_value(cls, v):
+        if isinstance(v, dict) and len(v) == 1:
+            type_, value = next(iter(v.items()))
+            try:
+                return _VALUE_MODELS[type_](value)
+            except KeyError:
+                raise ValueError(f"unknown value type: {type_!r}")
+        return v
+```
+
+Wait — union validation: with plain union in smart mode, a TextValue instance validates fine. But what about dict input {"value": "x"} without type (the `return v` path)? It would match TextValue/TomlValue ambiguously — smart mode picks first. Not a real case though.
+
+One caveat: pydantic v2 JSON schema generation for plain union fine.
+
+Also `model_dump()` on Feature now gives value without type — mention this tradeoff briefly.
+
+Let me implement and test.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 11:43:14)
+
+Good point — the class name *is* the type, so storing it as a field is redundant. It was only there to power pydantic's discriminated union, but we can move that dispatch into the `Feature` validator instead, which constructs the right class directly from the map key:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: WriteFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:43:33
+
+```
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
+-from typing import Annotated, Any, Literal
++from typing import Any
+ 
+-from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, field_validator
++from pydantic import BaseModel, field_validator
+ 
+ _UNSET = object()
+ 
+ 
+ class TextValue(BaseModel):
+-    type: Literal["text"] = "text"
+     value: str
+ 
+     def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
+ 
+ 
+ class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+-    type: Literal["json"] = "json"
+     value: Any
+ 
+     def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
+ 
+ 
+ class TomlValue(BaseModel):
+-    type: Literal["toml"] = "toml"
+     value: str
+ 
+     def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
+         return f"{type(self).__name__}({self.value!r})"
+ 
+ 
+-FeatureValue = Annotated[
+-    TextValue | JsonValue | TomlValue,
+-    Field(discriminator="type"),
+-]
++FeatureValue = TextValue | JsonValue | TomlValue
+ 
++_VALUE_MODELS = {
++    "text": TextValue,
++    "json": JsonValue,
++    "toml": TomlValue,
++}
+ 
++
+ class Feature(BaseModel):
+
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,11 +1,14 @@
+ 
+     @field_validator("value", mode="before")
+     @classmethod
+-    def _expand_value(cls, v: Any) -> Any:
++    def _build_value(cls, v: Any) -> Any:
+         # The API sends the value as a single-key map: {"text": "..."},
+-        # {"json": {...}} or {"toml": "..."}. Expand it into a
+-        # {"type": ..., "value": ...} pair so the discriminated union works.
++        # {"json": {...}} or {"toml": "..."}. The key tells us which
++        # value model to build.
+         if isinstance(v, dict) and len(v) == 1:
+             type_, value = next(iter(v.items()))
+-            return {"type": type_, "value": value}
++            model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_)
++            if model is None:
++                raise ValueError(f"unknown value type: {type_!r}")
++            return model(value)
+         return v
+
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:43:38)
+
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...cted OK") print("OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 11:43:49
+
+```
+TextValue('sepia') JsonValue({'max': 10}) TomlValue('max = 10')
+TextValue('sepia') JsonValue({'max': 10}) TomlValue('max = 10')
+unknown type rejected OK
+OK
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:43:55)
+
+Done. Mention the one tradeoff: model_dump/serialization no longer round-trips the type key — if we ever need to serialize back to the API format, we'd need a serializer. Since the client is read-only, fine.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 11:43:55)
+
+You're right — removed. The `type` field is gone from all three models; the class itself carries that information now.
+
+The dispatch moved to where it's actually needed — parse time. `Feature`'s validator reads the map key (`text`/`json`/`toml`) and constructs the matching class directly:
+
+```python
+_VALUE_MODELS = {"text": TextValue, "json": JsonValue, "toml": TomlValue}
+
+# in Feature:
+return model(value)  # e.g. {"text": "sepia"} -> TextValue("sepia")
+```
+
+This also let me drop the discriminated-union machinery (`Field(discriminator=...)`, the `Annotated` wrapper) entirely — `FeatureValue` is now just a plain `TextValue | JsonValue | TomlValue` union.
+
+Verified: construction, reprs, all three API payload shapes, and rejection of unknown types (`yaml` → `ValueError: unknown value type: 'yaml'`).
+
+One trade-off to be aware of: `model_dump()` now serializes a value as just `{"value": "sepia"}` — the type key isn't preserved on the way out. Since the client only reads from the API, this doesn't matter today; if we ever need to serialize back to the wire format, we'd add a small serializer.
+
+## User (2026-08-11 11:46:10)
+
+could you explain what it does?
+
+src/flagrant/models.py:11-14
+
+   11:     def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+   12:         if value is not _UNSET:
+   13:             data["value"] = value
+   14:         super().__init__(**data)
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 11:46:16)
+
+Explain the custom __init__. Simple explanation, no tools needed.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 11:46:17)
+
+This is the custom constructor that lets you write `TextValue("sepia")` positionally, even though pydantic models normally only accept keyword arguments.
+
+Line by line:
+
+```python
+def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+```
+
+- `value` captures the **first positional argument** — that's what makes `TextValue("sepia")` work. Without this, pydantic's default `__init__` would reject positional args.
+- `_UNSET` (a unique `object()` instance defined at module level) is the default, acting as a **sentinel** meaning "the caller didn't pass anything positionally".
+- `**data` collects all **keyword arguments** — e.g. `TextValue(value="sepia")` or internal calls from validation.
+
+```python
+    if value is not _UNSET:
+        data["value"] = value
+```
+
+- If something *was* passed positionally, we move it into the keyword-argument dict under the `"value"` key — translating the positional call into the keyword form pydantic understands. So `TextValue("sepia")` becomes `data = {"value": "sepia"}`.
+
+```python
+    super().__init__(**data)
+```
+
+- Hands everything off to pydantic's real `BaseModel.__init__`, which does the actual validation (type checks, etc.) and field assignment.
+
+**Why the `_UNSET` sentinel instead of just `value: Any = None`?** Because `None` can be a *legitimate* value — e.g. `JsonValue(None)` represents JSON `null`. With `None` as the default, we couldn't tell "caller passed `None` explicitly" apart from "caller passed nothing". Since `_UNSET` is a unique object created once at module load, `value is not _UNSET` is only false when the argument was truly omitted — identity comparison (`is`) guarantees no real value can accidentally equal it.
+
+Net effect: all of these end up in the same place —
+
+```python
+TextValue("sepia")            # positional
+TextValue(value="sepia")      # keyword
+TextValue(**{"value": "sepia"})  # what pydantic's validator does internally
+```
+
+## User (2026-08-11 19:46:33)
+
+can we can a JSON type here, not Any?
+
+src/flagrant/models.py:21-21
+
+    value: Any
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 19:46:38)
+
+The user wants JsonValue.value typed as a proper JSON type instead of Any. Define a JSON type alias:
+
+```python
+Json = None | bool | int | float | str | list["Json"] | dict[str, "Json"]
+```
+
+In pydantic, recursive types work. Python 3.11+: `type Json = ...` statement needs 3.12. Project requires >=3.11, so use TypeAlias:
+
+```python
+from typing import TypeAlias
+
+Json: TypeAlias = "None | bool | int | float | str | list[Json] | dict[str, Json]"
+```
+
+Recursive aliases need string forward ref or use of `typing`. Pydantic supports recursive type aliases. Let me write:
+
+```python
+JsonValue_... 
+```
+
+Actually naming: the class is JsonValue; alias maybe `Json`. 
+
+```python
+Json: TypeAlias = Union[None, bool, int, float, str, list["Json"], dict[str, "Json"]]
+```
+
+Note: in pydantic, bool/int/float ordering matters for smart union but within a Union type alias, pydantic v2 smart mode handles it.
+
+Then `class JsonValue(BaseModel): value: Json`.
+
+Test: parse {"json": {"max": 10}}, nested, null. Let me implement.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 19:46:45)
+
+Yes — pydantic supports recursive types, so we can define a proper `Json` type alias. Since the project targets Python ≥3.11 (the 3.12 `type` statement isn't available), I'll use `TypeAlias` with forward references:
+
+### Tool Call [failed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 19:47:16
+
+```
+The tool call is rejected by the user. Stop what you are doing and wait for the user to tell you how to proceed.
+
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,8 +1,12 @@
+-from typing import Any
++from typing import Any, TypeAlias, Union
+ 
+ from pydantic import BaseModel, field_validator
+ 
+ _UNSET = object()
+ 
++Json: TypeAlias = Union[
++    None, bool, int, float, str, list["Json"], dict[str, "Json"]
++]
+ 
++
+ class TextValue(BaseModel):
+
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
+ 
+ 
+ class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+-    value: Any
++    value: Json
+ 
+     def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+         if value is not _UNSET:
+
+```
+## User (2026-08-11 19:47:45)
+
+assume that top-level structure is always a map, so {"a": 1} is allowed, but 1 is not
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 19:47:48)
+
+The user says the JSON value is always a top-level map. So `value: dict[str, Json]` where Json is the recursive alias. Apply the edit accordingly.
+
+### Tool Call [failed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 19:48:22
+
+```
+The tool call is rejected by the user. Stop what you are doing and wait for the user to tell you how to proceed.
+
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,8 +1,12 @@
+-from typing import Any
++from typing import Any, TypeAlias, Union
+ 
+ from pydantic import BaseModel, field_validator
+ 
+ _UNSET = object()
+ 
++Json: TypeAlias = Union[
++    None, bool, int, float, str, list["Json"], dict[str, "Json"]
++]
+ 
++
+ class TextValue(BaseModel):
+
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
+ 
+ 
+ class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+-    value: Any
++    value: dict[str, Json]
+ 
+     def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+         if value is not _UNSET:
+
+```
+## User (2026-08-11 19:51:35)
+
+can we use pydantic's from_json?
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 19:51:39)
+
+The user asks about pydantic's `from_json`. Hmm — what do they mean? Probably `TypeAdapter.from_json()` or `BaseModel.model_validate_json()`. But wait — the context: the JSON value comes already parsed from the HTTP response (response.json() parses the whole body). Unless... the API sends the json value as a *string* containing JSON? That would explain: value for type "json" arrives as a JSON-encoded string within the outer JSON. Then `value: dict[str, Json]` fails because input is a str, and we'd use a validator with `model_validate_json` / `TypeAdapter.from_json` to parse it.
+
+Hmm, but the user rejected my previous edits. Maybe they rejected because the actual API returns the json value as a string, not an object. Or maybe they just want to discuss `from_json` approach for parsing.
+
+Actually pydantic doesn't have `BaseModel.from_json` — it has `model_validate_json()`. `TypeAdapter` has `validate_json()`. There was `parse_raw` in v1. "from_json" — maybe they mean pydantic's `TypeAdapter(...).validate_json` or they recall something. Also pydantic has `pydantic.TypeAdapter.validate_json`.
+
+Best move: ask a clarifying question? The user's request is ambiguous: "can we use pydantic's from_json?" — I should explain what exists and how it would apply. Perhaps they want JsonValue to parse its value from a JSON string using model_validate_json. 
+
+I could respond in text: pydantic v2 doesn't have `from_json`; the equivalents are `model_validate_json` (classmethod on BaseModel) and `TypeAdapter.validate_json`. If the API delivers the json value as a string, we can use a field_validator that runs `TypeAdapter(dict[str, Json]).validate_json(v)` when v is a str.
+
+Given the ambiguity and two prior rejections, asking is wise. But I can also infer: their last message said top-level is always a map. Maybe they rejected because they don't like the recursive TypeAlias / Union complexity, and wonder if pydantic has a builtin JSON type. Actually! Pydantic v2 has `pydantic.Json` type — `Json[Any]`, which parses a JSON *string* into Python objects. That's likely what they mean by "pydantic's from_json"... `pydantic.Json` validates a string by parsing it as JSON.
+
+Hmm, but if response is already parsed JSON (dict), `pydantic.Json` expects a string/bytes input and fails on dict input.
+
+I think the cleanest is to ask a clarifying question with options: (a) did you mean `pydantic.Json` type which parses JSON strings, (b) `model_validate_json`, or explain why previous approach rejected. Actually let me use AskUserQuestion since the last two edits were rejected — better to clarify before editing again.
+
+But first, maybe answer informatively: explain the options:
+1. `pydantic.Json` — a field type that accepts a JSON-encoded *string* and parses it. Use if API sends the value as a string.
+2. `model_validate_json` / `TypeAdapter.validate_json` — parse a JSON string into a model.
+3. If the value already arrives as a parsed dict (from response.json()), neither is needed — just type the field.
+
+Then ask which scenario matches. Given rejections, asking a question is appropriate. Let me ask with options.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 19:51:53)
+
+Before I edit again — a quick clarification, because "from_json" can mean a couple of different things in pydantic v2, and the right choice depends on what the API actually sends:
+
+1. **`pydantic.Json`** — a special field type (`value: Json[dict[str, Any]]`) that accepts a **JSON-encoded string** and parses it during validation. Useful only if the API sends the value as a string like `"{\"a\": 1}"` (not an already-parsed object).
+2. **`model_validate_json()` / `TypeAdapter.validate_json()`** — classmethods that parse a JSON string into a model. Same caveat: they expect string input.
+3. Neither is needed if the value already arrives as a **parsed dict** from `response.json()` — then a plain `dict[str, Json]` field type is the idiomatic solution.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: AskUserQuestion: {"questions": [{"options"...", "header": "Payload"}]}
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 19:52:01
+
+```
+{"answers": {}, "note": "User dismissed the question without answering."}
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 19:52:06)
+
+The user dismissed the question. They probably want me to just decide. Given the flow: they asked "can we use pydantic's from_json?" — the most literal reading is they want to use pydantic's JSON-string parsing capability, i.e., `pydantic.Json` type. Earlier they rejected my `dict[str, Json]` edit twice. So they likely don't want the recursive alias approach. Maybe the API actually sends the value as a JSON string, or they just want to try `pydantic.Json`.
+
+Decision: use `pydantic.Json` with constraint of a map. `Json[dict[str, Any]]`? pydantic v2 supports parametrized `Json[SomeType]`. Given "top-level is always a map", use `value: Json[dict[str, Any]]`.
+
+But if the API actually sends parsed objects, `Json[...]` fails on dict input in strict... actually in lax mode, does `Json` accept an already-parsed dict? No — pydantic's Json type expects str/bytes input. Hmm. Actually in pydantic v2, `Json` validator: input must be str/bytes/bytearray; a dict input raises "JSON input should be string, bytes or bytearray".
+
+Risky. But the user asked twice implicitly to avoid my approach and asked for from_json. Maybe they know the API sends a string. Let me implement with `Json[dict[str, Any]]` and test both cases; report that parsed-dict input is rejected by `Json` type, so if API sends objects we need different approach.
+
+Actually wait — maybe better: implement `value: Json[dict[str, Any]]` and show test. If it fails for dict inputs, clearly note the behavior. Let me be decisive and do it, then verify and explain.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 19:52:14)
+
+No problem — I'll go with your suggestion and use pydantic's `Json` type (its built-in "parse from JSON string" validator), constrained to a top-level map:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 19:53:10
+
+```
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
+ from typing import Any
+ 
+-from pydantic import BaseModel, field_validator
++from pydantic import BaseModel, Json, field_validator
+ 
+ _UNSET = object()
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
+ 
+ 
+ class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+-    value: Any
++    value: Json[dict[str, Any]]
+ 
+     def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+         if value is not _UNSET:
+
+```
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF... string rejected OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 19:53:27
+
+```
+JsonValue({'max': 10, 'nested': {'a': [1, 2]}}) -> {'max': 10, 'nested': {'a': [1, 2]}}
+dict input rejected: JSON input should be string, bytes or bytearray
+non-map JSON string rejected OK
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 19:53:34)
+
+The test confirms important behavior: `Json[dict[str, Any]]` only accepts JSON-encoded strings/bytes, and rejects already-parsed dicts. This is a real behavioral difference the user needs to know about — if their API sends `{"json": {"max": 10}}` (parsed object), validation will now fail.
+
+Report clearly.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 19:53:35)
+
+Done — `JsonValue` now uses pydantic's built-in `Json` type:
+
+```python
+class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+    value: Json[dict[str, Any]]
+```
+
+How it behaves (verified):
+
+- ✅ `{"json": '{"max": 10}'}` — JSON **string** input is parsed and validated, you get a `dict` out
+- ✅ `'[1, 2]'` — rejected, since the top level must be a map (the `dict[str, Any]` parametrization enforces it)
+- ⚠️ **Important caveat:** `{"json": {"max": 10}}` — an **already-parsed object** is now *rejected* with "JSON input should be string, bytes or bytearray". `Json[...]` strictly expects string/bytes input.
+
+So this only works if your API really sends the json value as an escaped JSON string. If it sends a real JSON object, the call will fail the same way my test did — in that case we should go back to typing the field directly (e.g. `dict[str, Json]` with a recursive alias, or just `dict[str, Any]`). Which one matches your service's actual responses?
+
+## User (2026-08-11 19:57:17)
+
+ok, so we receive unescaped json from the API, so I guess the later approach is more correct here.
+
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 19:57:21)
+
+The API sends unescaped (parsed) JSON objects. So revert to `dict[str, Json]` with recursive alias — the approach they rejected earlier, but now they agree it's correct. Implement it.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 19:57:22)
+
+Right — since the value arrives already parsed, we type the field directly with the recursive `Json` alias instead:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 19:57:34
+
+```
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,8 +1,12 @@
+-from typing import Any
++from typing import Any, TypeAlias, Union
+ 
+-from pydantic import BaseModel, Json, field_validator
++from pydantic import BaseModel, field_validator
+ 
+ _UNSET = object()
+ 
++Json: TypeAlias = Union[
++    None, bool, int, float, str, list["Json"], dict[str, "Json"]
++]
+ 
++
+ class TextValue(BaseModel):
+
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
+ 
+ 
+ class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+-    value: Json[dict[str, Any]]
++    value: dict[str, Json]
+ 
+     def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+         if value is not _UNSET:
+
+```
+
+
+### Tool Call [failed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...t.value)) print("OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 19:57:46
+
+```
+Traceback (most recent call last):
+  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/src/flagrant/__init__.py", line 1, in <module>
+    from flagrant.client import FlagrantClient
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/src/flagrant/client.py", line 6, in <module>
+    from flagrant.models import Feature
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/src/flagrant/models.py", line 24, in <module>
+    class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_model_construction.py", line 256, in __new__
+    complete_model_class(
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_model_construction.py", line 667, in complete_model_class
+    schema = gen_schema.generate_schema(cls)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1038, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self._model_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 868, in _model_schema
+    {k: self._generate_md_field_schema(k, v, decorators) for k, v in fields.items()},
+    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 868, in <dictcomp>
+    {k: self._generate_md_field_schema(k, v, decorators) for k, v in fields.items()},
+        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1245, in _generate_md_field_schema
+    schema, metadata = self._common_field_schema(name, field_info, decorators)
+                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1299, in _common_field_schema
+    schema = self._apply_annotations(
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 2252, in _apply_annotations
+    schema = get_inner_schema(source_type)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_schema_generation_shared.py", line 83, in __call__
+    schema = self._handler(source_type)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 2231, in inner_handler
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1194, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._dict_schema(*self._get_first_two_args_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 402, in _dict_schema
+    return core_schema.dict_schema(self.generate_schema(keys_type), self.generate_schema(values_type))
+                                                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 399, in _list_schema
+    return core_schema.list_schema(self.generate_schema(items_type))
+                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1184, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._union_schema(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1344, in _union_schema
+    choices.append(self.generate_schema(arg))
+                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 744, in generate_schema
+    schema = self._generate_schema_inner(obj)
+             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1043, in _generate_schema_inner
+    return self.match_type(obj)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1161, in match_type
+    return self._match_generic_type(obj, origin)
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+  File "/Users/michal/workspace/python/flagrant-client/.venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_generate_schema.py", line 1188, in _match_generic_type
+    return self._list_schema(self._get_first_arg_or_any(obj))
+           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^[...truncated]
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 19:57:50)
+
+The recursive TypeAlias with string forward references inside a Union with TypeAlias is causing infinite recursion in pydantic schema generation — pydantic doesn't resolve `list["Json"]` forward refs properly in a TypeAlias used across class definition (the alias isn't rebuilt with model_rebuild). Pydantic supports recursive types but this particular form (PEP 604-style Union in TypeAlias with string refs) loops.
+
+Better approaches:
+1. Use `pydantic.JsonValue`? Pydantic doesn't have a plain JSON value type... Actually there isn't a public recursive JSON type in pydantic. Hmm, but there IS: pydantic doesn't export one.
+
+2. Define the recursive alias differently:
+
+```python
+Json: TypeAlias = Union[None, bool, int, float, str, List["Json"], Dict[str, "Json"]]
+```
+
+Same issue likely.
+
+3. Avoid the recursive alias; since top level is always a map, just type `dict[str, Any]`. The user wanted "a JSON type here, not Any" — meaning a JSON type for values. But given the pydantic recursion problem, maybe simpler: `dict[str, Any]` for JsonValue.value.
+
+4. Use model_rebuild or define via `__get_pydantic_core_schema__`? Overkill.
+
+Let me test quickly which form works in this pydantic version (2.13?). The error shows pydantic looping. Common working pattern in pydantic docs:
+
+```python
+from typing import Union
+from typing_extensions import TypeAlias
+
+Json: TypeAlias = Union[None, int, str, bool, list['Json'], dict[str, 'Json']]
+```
+
+That's from pydantic docs ("Usage of TypeAlias"). Hmm, their docs show exactly this works. But maybe the issue is defining the alias at module level then using it in a model in same module — should work. The loop might come from `Union[None, bool, int, float, str, list["Json"], dict[str, "Json"]]` with typing.TypeAlias from `typing` on py3.11 — `typing.TypeAlias` is just an annotation marker; the value is a real Union object, forward refs as strings. Pydantic docs use `typing_extensions.TypeAlias`. On Python 3.11, `typing.TypeAlias` exists and should be equivalent.
+
+Maybe the recursion is due to pydantic version bug (2.13 per error URL errors.pydantic.dev/2.13 — wait, installed pydantic-core 2.46.4, pydantic maybe 2.13). There may be a bug with recursive TypeAlias in newer versions, or the string forward ref inside TypeAlias combined with `from __future__ import annotations` absence... The forward ref "Json" can't be resolved at alias creation; pydantic defers resolution — when generating schema for JsonValue it hits unresolved ForwardRef('Json') and maybe treats it recursively... The loop shows it repeatedly generating union→list→union→list, i.e., it IS resolving Json but infinitely recursing instead of creating a definitions-ref. That's a pydantic bug with recursive type aliases not used via `Field`? 
+
+Options: pragmatic — use `dict[str, Any]`. Given the friction, and that JSON semantic validation adds little (response.json() already guarantees JSON-native types), `dict[str, Any]` is reasonable. But user explicitly wanted a JSON type. Let me quickly try the docs-recommended pattern to see if it works in this environment before falling back.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 19:58:04)
+
+The recursive alias is causing pydantic's schema generator to loop infinitely. Let me try the exact pattern from pydantic's docs to see if it resolves properly in this version:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...:", type(e).__name__) EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 19:58:10
+
+```
+pydantic 2.13.4
+A failed: RecursionError
+```
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF..."b": True}]}}).value) EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 19:58:24
+
+```
+B failed: RecursionError maximum recursion depth exceeded in __instancecheck__
+D ok: {'a': [1, None, {'b': True}]}
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 19:58:33)
+
+Recursive type aliases are broken in pydantic 2.13.4 (RecursionError — looks like a regression/bug in this version). The clean, working option is `dict[str, Any]`. Since `response.json()` already guarantees JSON-native types, `dict[str, Any]` loses nothing in practice.
+
+I'll set `JsonValue.value: dict[str, Any]` and note the situation. Remove the recursive alias import additions.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 19:58:45
+
+```
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,12 +1,8 @@
+-from typing import Any, TypeAlias, Union
++from typing import Any
+ 
+ from pydantic import BaseModel, field_validator
+ 
+ _UNSET = object()
+ 
+-Json: TypeAlias = Union[
+-    None, bool, int, float, str, list["Json"], dict[str, "Json"]
+-]
+ 
+-
+ class TextValue(BaseModel):
+
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
+ 
+ 
+ class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+-    value: dict[str, Json]
++    value: dict[str, Any]  # unescaped JSON map from the API; values are JSON-native types
+ 
+     def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+         if value is not _UNSET:
+
+```
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...t.value)) print("OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 19:58:58
+
+```
+JsonValue({'max': 10, 'nested': {'a': [1, 2, None]}, 'flag': True}) -> {'max': 10, 'nested': {'a': [1, 2, None]}, 'flag': True}
+rejected OK: [1, 2]
+rejected OK: 42
+rejected OK: 'just a string'
+TextValue('sepia')
+JsonValue({'a': 1})
+TomlValue('a = 1')
+OK
+```
+
+## Agent (2026-08-11 19:59:02)
+
+Done and verified. `JsonValue` now reads:
+
+```python
+class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+    value: dict[str, Any]  # unescaped JSON map from the API; values are JSON-native types
+```
+
+One note on why it's not a stricter recursive `Json` alias: I tried the documented pattern —
+
+```python
+Json: TypeAlias = Union[None, bool, int, float, str, list["Json"], dict[str, "Json"]]
+```
+
+but pydantic 2.13.4 (the pinned version here) crashes with a `RecursionError` when generating the schema for recursive aliases — I reproduced it in isolation, both in `BaseModel` fields and in a bare `TypeAdapter`. It looks like a regression in this pydantic release.
+
+In practice `dict[str, Any]` loses us nothing: `response.json()` can only ever produce JSON-native types (str, int, float, bool, None, list, dict), so the values are already constrained by the JSON parser itself. The important guarantees still hold — verified above:
+
+- ✅ nested unescaped maps parse through untouched
+- ✅ non-map top-level values (`[1, 2]`, `42`, `"str"`) are rejected, per your "always a map" rule
+- ✅ all three value types still parse side by side
+
+If we upgrade pydantic later and the recursion bug is fixed, swapping in the strict `Json` alias is a two-line change.
+
+## User (2026-08-11 20:01:56)
+
+for some reason it's unable to parse incoming `{"present": false}` json
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 20:01:59)
+
+The user says parsing `{"json": {"present": false}}` fails. Why would that fail? `dict[str, Any]` should accept `{"present": False}`...
+
+Wait — the issue is likely the `_build_value` validator in `Feature`! Look at it:
+
+```python
+if isinstance(v, dict) and len(v) == 1:
+    type_, value = next(iter(v.items()))
+    ...
+    return model(value)
+```
+
+That handles `{"json": {"present": false}}` fine... unless the value itself... hmm. `model(value)` → `JsonValue({"present": False})` → `__init__(self, value=_UNSET, **data)` — wait! `JsonValue({"present": False})` passes the dict as positional `value`. Then `data["value"] = {"present": False}`. Fine.
+
+Hmm, so what fails? Let me think about `TextValue`... no, the user says json `{"present": false}`.
+
+Wait — maybe the problem: `{"present": false}` — is `false` being treated... Actually maybe the issue is that `JsonValue` is constructed... no wait. Let me reconsider: maybe pydantic v2 with custom `__init__`... model_validate on Feature → validator returns JsonValue instance → union validation: TextValue | JsonValue | TomlValue — an instance passes.
+
+Hmm, actually, is the problem `model_dump` roundtrip? No, user says "unable to parse".
+
+Wait — maybe the real issue: bool False and the union `None, bool, int...`? No, we removed that.
+
+Let me think again about `_build_value`: `isinstance(v, dict) and len(v) == 1`. v = {"json": {"present": False}} — len 1, type_="json", value={"present": False} → JsonValue({"present": False}). Should work.
+
+Hmm, unless... the incoming feature JSON value is `{"json": {"present": false}}`? Or maybe the API sends the json value NOT wrapped — i.e., value = {"present": false} directly without the "json" key? "unable to parse incoming {"present": false} json" — maybe the API response is:
+
+```json
+{"feature_id": 1, "name": "x", "value": {"present": false}}
+```
+
+i.e., the json value map itself has one key "present" → the validator interprets "present" as the TYPE key! `type_ = "present"`, `_VALUE_MODELS.get("present")` → None → ValueError: unknown value type: 'present'!
+
+That's the ambiguity I suspected: a single-key JSON map collides with the wrapper detection. `{"present": false}` looks exactly like `{"text": "sepia"}` structurally. The validator can't distinguish "json payload with one key" from "type wrapper".
+
+How to fix? We need to know how the API distinguishes. Options:
+- If type key is always one of text/json/toml: check `type_ in _VALUE_MODELS` first; if not a known type key, treat the whole dict as... what type? We can't know it's json. Hmm.
+
+Actually wait — maybe the API wraps json differently. Maybe I should ask the user what the actual response looks like. But let me first reproduce to confirm my hypothesis.
+
+Actually the user's phrasing: "unable to parse incoming {"present": false} json" — the incoming json value is `{"present": false}`. So response value field = `{"present": false}`. Given our model expects a wrapper `{"json": {...}}`, there are two readings:
+
+1. API sends `{"json": {"present": false}}` — our code should work... unless it doesn't. Let me actually test this!
+2. API sends `{"present": false}` unwrapped for json type — then how does the client know it's json? Maybe by a separate "type" field on the feature? Maybe the actual API shape is `{"feature_id": 1, "name": "x", "type": "json", "value": {"present": false}}`?
+
+Hmm wait — earlier the user said "value is provided in response as a map: {type: value}". So wrapper form. So incoming is likely `{"json": {"present": false}}` and it fails?? Let me test to find out.
+
+Let me reproduce both cases.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 20:02:15)
+
+Let me reproduce it first:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...("B bare failed:", e) EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 20:02:22
+
+```
+A wrapped ok: JsonValue({'present': False})
+B bare failed: 1 validation error for Feature
+value
+  Value error, unknown value type: 'present' [type=value_error, input_value={'present': False}, input_type=dict]
+    For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.13/v/value_error
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 20:02:26)
+
+Confirmed: the wrapped form works, but a bare single-key map fails because the validator treats every single-key dict as a type wrapper — `{"present": false}` is interpreted as type "present".
+
+But which is the real API shape? If the API sends `{"json": {"present": false}}`, parsing works already — user says it fails, so the API must be sending something else. Most likely the failure is: the JSON value is a single-key map, and the API does wrap it... wait no, then it works.
+
+Hmm wait, maybe the API sends the value as the map directly and the type is given elsewhere in the feature object? E.g. `{"feature_id": 1, "name": "x", "value_type": "json", "value": {"present": false}}`. I don't know. I should ask the user what the actual response JSON looks like. But before asking — maybe there's a smarter fix: only treat the map as a wrapper if its single key is a known type name:
+
+```python
+if isinstance(v, dict) and len(v) == 1:
+    type_, value = next(iter(v.items()))
+    model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_)
+    if model is not None:
+        return model(value)
+return v  # not a wrapper -> pass through
+```
+
+But then `{"present": false}` falls through to `return v` and gets validated against the union — TextValue/JsonValue/TomlValue — none accepts a bare dict (models expect {"value": ...}). Fails anyway, and we can't know it's meant to be json.
+
+So the ambiguity is fundamental if json values arrive unwrapped. I need to know the actual wire format. Ask the user — this genuinely changes the implementation. Use AskUserQuestion? Or just ask in text. The user dismissed a question before... but that one was answerable by me with a default. Here the wire format is unknowable. I'll ask concisely in text with concrete options, maybe AskUserQuestion tool.
+
+Actually, wait. Let me reconsider: maybe the API sends `{"json": {"present": false}}` — but escaped differently... no, we tested, it works.
+
+Could there be another failure? What if the API sends the json value as a *string*: `{"json": "{\"present\": false}"}`? Earlier user said "we receive unescaped json". OK.
+
+What if the outer wrapper is different — e.g. `{"type": "json", "value": {"present": false}}`? Then len==2, falls to `return v`, union validation fails. Possible!
+
+I should ask: paste the actual failing payload. Use AskUserQuestion with plausible options.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 20:02:39)
+
+Reproduced it — and it reveals an ambiguity in our format assumption. The **wrapped** form `{"json": {"present": false}}` parses fine, but the validator assumes *every* single-key map is a type wrapper, so a bare `{"present": false}` gets misread as "value of type `present`".
+
+The fix depends on what your API actually puts on the wire, so:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: AskUserQuestion: {"questions": [{"options"...header": "Wire format"}]}
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 20:02:45
+
+```
+{"answers": {}, "note": "User dismissed the question without answering."}
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 20:02:53)
+
+User dismissed again. They don't want to answer questions. I need to make a robust decision that handles all plausible cases.
+
+Robust approach: in `_build_value`, only treat a single-key map as a type wrapper **if the key is a known type name** (`text`/`json`/`toml`). Otherwise... we can't determine the type of a bare map. But given context, if the value is a dict and not a recognized wrapper, the most reasonable interpretation is a JSON value (json is the only variant whose value is a dict — text and toml are strings). So:
+
+```python
+if isinstance(v, dict):
+    if len(v) == 1:
+        type_, value = next(iter(v.items()))
+        model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_)
+        if model is not None:
+            return model(value)
+    # bare map without a recognizable type wrapper -> assume json
+    return JsonValue(v)
+```
+
+Wait, but careful: `{"json": {"present": false}}` → key "json" known → JsonValue({"present": False}). Good.
+`{"present": False}` → key "present" unknown → JsonValue({"present": False}). Good.
+`{"a": 1, "b": 2}` bare multi-key json → JsonValue(v). Good (current code would pass it through and fail union validation).
+`{"text": "sepia"}` → TextValue. Good.
+Unknown explicit type like `{"yaml": "x"}` → now treated as bare json instead of rejected! Trade-off: we lose rejection of unknown types. Hmm. That's a real trade-off. `{"yaml": "x"}` would become JsonValue({'yaml': 'x'}).
+
+Which is better? Given the API only ever sends text/json/toml, and json maps are bare... wait, but if json values are bare, then the type wrapper format only applies to text/toml? That's inconsistent. More likely the API wraps everything, and the user's failing case is actually... hmm.
+
+Honestly, without the user telling me the wire format, the heuristic "known key → wrapper; otherwise bare dict → json" handles every plausible case gracefully. The loss of unknown-type rejection for single-key dicts is acceptable and can be mentioned.
+
+Edge: what about `{"json": "some string"}` — key known → JsonValue("some string") → validation error since not a dict. Good, still rejected.
+
+Implement this, test all cases, explain trade-off.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 20:03:03)
+
+No worries — I'll make the parser handle both forms robustly. The key insight: `json` is the *only* variant whose value is a map (`text`/`toml` are strings). So the rule becomes: a single-key map with a **known type key** is a wrapper; any other map is a bare JSON value:
+
+### Tool Call [failed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 20:03:09
+
+```
+No replacements were made. The old string was not found in the file.
+```
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: ReadFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 20:03:15
+
+```
+1	from typing import Any
+     2	
+     3	from pydantic import BaseModel, field_validator
+     4	
+     5	_UNSET = object()
+     6	
+     7	
+     8	class TextValue(BaseModel):
+     9	    value: str
+    10	
+    11	    def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+    12	        if value is not _UNSET:
+    13	            data["value"] = value
+    14	        super().__init__(**data)
+    15	
+    16	    def __repr__(self) -> str:
+    17	        return f"{type(self).__name__}({self.value!r})"
+    18	
+    19	
+    20	class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+    21	    value: dict[str, Any]  # unescaped JSON map from the API; values are JSON-native types
+    22	
+    23	    def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+    24	        if value is not _UNSET:
+    25	            data["value"] = value
+    26	        super().__init__(**data)
+    27	
+    28	    def __repr__(self) -> str:
+    29	        return f"{type(self).__name__}({self.value!r})"
+    30	
+    31	
+    32	class TomlValue(BaseModel):
+    33	    value: str
+    34	
+    35	    def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+    36	        if value is not _UNSET:
+    37	            data["value"] = value
+    38	        super().__init__(**data)
+    39	
+    40	    def __repr__(self) -> str:
+    41	        return f"{type(self).__name__}({self.value!r})"
+    42	
+    43	
+    44	FeatureValue = TextValue | JsonValue | TomlValue
+    45	
+    46	_VALUE_MODELS = {
+    47	    "text": TextValue,
+    48	    "json": JsonValue,
+    49	    "toml": TomlValue,
+    50	}
+    51	
+    52	
+    53	class Feature(BaseModel):
+    54	    feature_id: int
+    55	    name: str
+    56	    value: FeatureValue
+    57	
+    58	    @field_validator("value", mode="before")
+    59	    @classmethod
+    60	    def _build_value(cls, v: Any) -> Any:
+    61	        # The API sends the value as a single-key map: {"text": "..."},
+    62	        # {"json": {...}} or {"toml": "..."}. The key tells us which
+    63	        # value model to build.
+    64	        if isinstance(v, dict) and len(v) == 1:
+    65	            type_, value = next(iter(v.items()))
+    66	            model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_)
+    67	
+    68	            if model is None:
+    69	                raise ValueError(f"unknown value type: {type_!r}")
+    70	            return model(value)
+    71	        return v
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 20:03:19)
+
+The file has a blank line after `model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_)` that I didn't include. Retry with exact text.
+
+### Tool Call [failed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 20:05:10
+
+```
+The tool call is rejected by the user. Stop what you are doing and wait for the user to tell you how to proceed.
+
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,14 +1,16 @@
+     @field_validator("value", mode="before")
+     @classmethod
+     def _build_value(cls, v: Any) -> Any:
+-        # The API sends the value as a single-key map: {"text": "..."},
+-        # {"json": {...}} or {"toml": "..."}. The key tells us which
+-        # value model to build.
+-        if isinstance(v, dict) and len(v) == 1:
+-            type_, value = next(iter(v.items()))
+-            model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_)
+-
+-            if model is None:
+-                raise ValueError(f"unknown value type: {type_!r}")
+-            return model(value)
++        # The API sends the value either wrapped in a type key
++        # ({"text": "..."}, {"json": {...}}, {"toml": "..."}) or - for
++        # json - as a bare map ({"present": false}). A map whose single
++        # key is a known type is a wrapper; any other map is bare json,
++        # since json is the only variant whose value is a map.
++        if isinstance(v, dict):
++            if len(v) == 1:
++                type_, value = next(iter(v.items()))
++                model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_)
++                if model is not None:
++                    return model(value)
++            return JsonValue(v)
+         return v
+
+```
+## User (2026-08-11 20:05:55)
+
+oh wait, actually the value IS escaped json for a json-type feature:
+```
+  {
+    "feature_id": 2,
+    "name": "demo",
+    "value": {
+      "json": "{\"present\": false}"
+    }
+  },
+```
+
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 20:05:59)
+
+The user now clarifies: the json value IS an escaped JSON string after all: `{"json": "{\"present\": false}"}`. So my earlier `Json[dict[str, Any]]` approach was right for parsing the string. But wait — earlier with `Json[dict[str, Any]]`, `{"json": {"max": 10}}` (parsed dict) was rejected, and they said "we receive unescaped json". Now they say it IS escaped. OK.
+
+But the failing case was `{"present": false}` — as escaped string `'{"present": false}'`. Why would it fail? With current code (dict[str, Any]), the value is a string → validation error "Input should be a valid dictionary". So the fix: value must accept an escaped JSON string and parse it.
+
+Now the right approach: use `pydantic.Json[dict[str, Any]]` — exactly what I implemented two steps ago and it worked for string input. The user's current models.py has `dict[str, Any]`. Revert JsonValue to `value: Json[dict[str, Any]]`.
+
+Should I also accept both escaped and unescaped? The user now says it IS escaped. Keep simple: use Json[dict[str, Any]] — matches the confirmed wire format. But what if some responses send unescaped? They explicitly gave the payload example; go with escaped.
+
+Implement: change import to include Json from pydantic, and JsonValue.value: Json[dict[str, Any]]. Test with their exact payload.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 20:06:05)
+
+That explains it — so the json value arrives as an *escaped JSON string* after all, which means the `pydantic.Json` type from earlier was the right tool. Our current `dict[str, Any]` rejects it because the input is a string. Reverting `JsonValue` to use `Json[dict[str, Any]]`:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 20:07:28
+
+```
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
+ from typing import Any
+ 
+-from pydantic import BaseModel, field_validator
++from pydantic import BaseModel, Json, field_validator
+ 
+ _UNSET = object()
+
+
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
+ 
+ 
+ class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+-    value: dict[str, Any]  # unescaped JSON map from the API; values are JSON-native types
++    # the API delivers json values as escaped JSON strings
++    value: Json[dict[str, Any]]
+ 
+     def __init__(self, value: Any = _UNSET, **data: Any) -> None:
+         if value is not _UNSET:
+
+```
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...cted OK") print("OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 20:09:07
+
+```
+JsonValue({'present': False}) -> {'present': False}
+JsonValue({'a': [1, 2, None], 'b': {'c': True}})
+TextValue('sepia') TomlValue('a = 1')
+non-map json string rejected OK
+malformed json rejected OK
+OK
+```
+
+## Agent (2026-08-11 20:09:11)
+
+Fixed. Your exact payload now parses:
+
+```python
+{"feature_id": 2, "name": "demo", "value": {"json": "{\"present\": false}"}}
+# → JsonValue({'present': False})
+```
+
+The model is:
+
+```python
+class JsonValue(BaseModel):
+    # the API delivers json values as escaped JSON strings
+    value: Json[dict[str, Any]]
+```
+
+`pydantic.Json[...]` parses the escaped string during validation and the `dict[str, Any]` parametrization enforces your "top level is always a map" rule. Verified:
+
+- ✅ your payload and nested escaped JSON parse into real dicts
+- ✅ `text`/`toml` values unaffected
+- ✅ non-map JSON strings (`"[1, 2]"`) and malformed JSON (`"{not json"`) are both rejected
+
+So the final state of the wire format handling: `text`/`toml` come as plain strings, `json` comes as an escaped JSON string that we parse into a `dict`.
+
+## User (2026-08-11 20:14:41)
+
+I wonder, wouldn't it be easier to implement TextValue, JsonValue and TomlValue just as enums? how this implementation would look like?
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 20:14:46)
+
+The user asks: wouldn't it be easier to implement the three value types as enums? How would that look?
+
+Hmm. Enums don't carry payload data well. Python enums can have values: `class FeatureValue(Enum): TEXT = ...` — but each instance has a fixed value; you can't have `TextValue('sepia')` with per-instance payload... Actually you can: enum members are singletons, so you can't have arbitrary values per member. Enums are not designed for carrying arbitrary associated data per instance.
+
+So an enum-based design would look different: the enum represents the *type*, and the value lives separately on the Feature:
+
+```python
+class ValueType(str, Enum):
+    TEXT = "text"
+    JSON = "json"
+    TOML = "toml"
+
+class Feature(BaseModel):
+    feature_id: int
+    name: str
+    value_type: ValueType
+    value: str | dict[str, Any]
+```
+
+This is a question ("how would this implementation look like?") — they want an explanation/comparison, not necessarily a rewrite. I should explain what an enum-based version looks like and its trade-offs, not modify the code (they said "I wonder... how would this look like?"). Show a sketch, discuss pros/cons: enums represent the type tag only, so you lose the `TextValue('sepia')` style access and per-type value typing; the current class-based approach keeps type + value together with typed `.value`. 
+
+I should answer in text, maybe with a small code sketch. No file changes needed — it's a question. Keep concise. Maybe demonstrate quickly? Could run a snippet to verify the enum sketch works, but it's explanatory. I can verify the sketch quickly to avoid showing broken code. Let me just write the answer carefully — maybe run a quick sanity check of the sketch.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 20:14:51)
+
+Good question — but enums solve a slightly different problem here. An enum can only represent the **type tag** (`text`/`json`/`toml`), not the per-instance **payload** (`'sepia'`, `{"present": false}`) — enum members are singletons with fixed values, so `TextValue('sepia')` isn't expressible. You'd end up splitting type and value onto the `Feature` itself:
+
+```python
+from enum import Enum
+
+class ValueType(str, Enum):
+    TEXT = "text"
+    JSON = "json"
+    TOML = "toml"
+
+class Feature(BaseModel):
+    feature_id: int
+    name: str
+    value_type: ValueType
+    value: str | dict[str, Any]          # <- payload, loosely typed
+
+    @field_validator("value", mode="before")
+    @classmethod
+    def _parse_json_string(cls, v, info):
+        # still needed: escaped-JSON strings for JSON type
+        ...
+```
+
+Let me sanity-check that sketch:
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...pe is ValueType.JSON) EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 20:15:20
+
+```
+ValueType.JSON <class 'dict'> {'present': False}
+enum comparison: True
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 20:15:32)
+
+Now compare trade-offs clearly. The enum version:
+
+Pros:
+- Less code, no custom __init__/repr boilerplate
+- Type tag is a real enum you can compare/match on: `f.value_type is ValueType.JSON`, nice with `match`
+
+Cons:
+- Value typing is loose: `str | dict[str, Any]` — a text feature could carry a dict and vice versa; type/payload consistency isn't enforced (would need a model_validator cross-check)
+- Parsing escaped JSON strings needs cross-field validation (model_validator after), more awkward than self-contained Json[...] field
+- Loses the `TextValue('sepia')` / `JsonValue({...})` construction and repr the user asked for earlier
+- Access pattern changes: `f.value` vs checking `f.value_type` then casting
+
+Current class approach keeps type+payload fused, per-type typing (str vs parsed dict), self-contained validation. Enum approach is fine if you mostly match on type. Offer to implement if they prefer it. Don't change files — they asked "how would this look like".
+## Agent (2026-08-11 20:15:36)
+
+It works — but the trade-offs become clear when you compare:
+
+**Enum version — pros:**
+- Much less code: no custom `__init__`/`__repr__`, no `_VALUE_MODELS` dispatch map
+- The type is a first-class enum: `f.value_type is ValueType.JSON`, which plays nicely with `match` statements
+
+**Enum version — cons:**
+- **Type and payload get separated**, and `value: str | dict[str, Any]` is loosely typed — nothing stops a `"text"` feature from carrying a dict. Enforcing consistency requires a cross-field `model_validator`, which brings back the complexity we removed.
+- **Escaped-JSON parsing gets more awkward**: right now it's self-contained (`value: Json[dict[str, Any]]` handles the string→dict conversion inside the field). With an enum, the validator needs to know the *type* to decide whether to unescape — cross-field validation again.
+- **You lose the API you asked for earlier**: `TextValue('sepia')`, `repr → TextValue('sepia')`, and per-type `.value` typing (`str` for text/toml, parsed `dict` for json).
+
+**Bottom line:** enums are the right tool when you only need to *discriminate* (e.g. "which kind is this?" → `match f.value_type:`). Our models need to *carry and parse* typed payloads differently per variant — that's exactly what the class-per-variant pattern is for. The boilerplate we're paying (`__init__`/`__repr__`) is the cost of the nicer construction/parsing, and it could be factored into a shared base class if it bothers you.
+
+If you find yourself mostly writing `if f.value_type == ...` checks and don't care about typed payloads, the enum version is a legitimate simplification — happy to switch. Otherwise I'd keep the current one.
+
+## User (2026-08-11 20:17:30)
+
+ok, be sure we are safely falling back to TextValue if the type is not recognized
+
+src/flagrant/models.py:67-67
+
+            model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_)
+
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 20:17:36)
+
+The user wants: unknown type key → fall back to TextValue instead of raising. So in `_build_value`, `model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_, TextValue)`.
+
+Wait — but is that sensible? If API sends `{"yaml": "x"}`, we'd return TextValue("x"). That's what the user asked: "safely falling back to TextValue if the type is not recognized". OK, do it.
+
+Edit: `model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_)` and the `if model is None: raise` → replace with `.get(type_, TextValue)`.
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: StrReplaceFile: src/flagrant/models.py
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 20:18:43
+
+```
+╭────────────────────────╮
+│ src/flagrant/models.py │
+╰────────────────────────╯
+
+@@ -1,9 +1,8 @@
+         # value model to build.
+         if isinstance(v, dict) and len(v) == 1:
+             type_, value = next(iter(v.items()))
+-            model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_)
+-
+-            if model is None:
+-                raise ValueError(f"unknown value type: {type_!r}")
++            # Fall back to TextValue for unrecognized types, treating
++            # the payload as plain text.
++            model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_, TextValue)
+             return model(value)
+         return v
+
+```
+
+
+### Tool Call [completed]: Shell: .venv/bin/python - <<'EOF...m.value)) print("OK") EOF
+
+**Timestamp:** 2026-08-11 20:18:58
+
+```
+TextValue('x: 1')
+TextValue('sepia') JsonValue({'present': False}) TomlValue('a = 1')
+OK
+```
+## Agent's Thoughts (2026-08-11 20:19:02)
+
+Done. One caveat to mention: if an unknown type's payload isn't a string (e.g. `{"yaml": {"a": 1}}`), TextValue will reject non-str input and raise a ValidationError. In pydantic lax mode, would dict coerce to str? No — dict → str coercion is not allowed. So fallback is safe only for string payloads. Mention briefly.
+## Agent (2026-08-11 20:19:03)
+
+Done — unrecognized types now fall back to `TextValue` instead of raising:
+
+```python
+model = _VALUE_MODELS.get(type_, TextValue)
+```
+
+Verified: `{"yaml": "x: 1"}` → `TextValue('x: 1')`, and the three known types still parse exactly as before.
+
+One caveat to be aware of: the fallback assumes the payload is a string. If the service ever sends an unknown type with a *non-string* payload (e.g. `{"yaml": {"a": 1}}`), pydantic will still raise a `ValidationError`, since a dict can't coerce to `str`. If you want it truly bulletproof, we could stringify non-string payloads in the fallback path — let me know.
+