diff-diff 3.7.0__tar.gz → 3.9.0__tar.gz

{diff_diff-3.7.0 → diff_diff-3.9.0}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: diff-diff
-Version: 3.7.0
+Version: 3.9.0
 Classifier: Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable
 Classifier: Intended Audience :: Science/Research
 Classifier: Operating System :: OS Independent
@@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ Requires-Dist: scipy>=1.10
 Requires-Dist: pytest>=7.0 ; extra == 'dev'
 Requires-Dist: pytest-xdist>=3.0 ; extra == 'dev'
 Requires-Dist: pytest-cov>=4.0 ; extra == 'dev'
-Requires-Dist: black>=23.0 ; extra == 'dev'
-Requires-Dist: ruff>=0.1.0 ; extra == 'dev'
-Requires-Dist: mypy>=1.0 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: black==26.5.1 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: ruff==0.16.0 ; extra == 'dev'
+Requires-Dist: mypy==2.3.0 ; extra == 'dev'
 Requires-Dist: maturin>=1.4,<2.0 ; extra == 'dev'
 Requires-Dist: matplotlib>=3.5 ; extra == 'dev'
 Requires-Dist: nbmake>=1.5 ; extra == 'dev'
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ Requires-Dist: sphinxext-opengraph>=0.9 ; extra == 'docs'
 Requires-Dist: sphinx-sitemap>=2.5 ; extra == 'docs'
 Requires-Dist: nbsphinx>=0.9 ; extra == 'docs'
 Requires-Dist: myst-parser>=2.0 ; extra == 'docs'
+Requires-Dist: sphinx-design>=0.6.1 ; extra == 'docs'
 Requires-Dist: matplotlib>=3.5 ; extra == 'docs'
 Requires-Dist: ipython>=8.0 ; extra == 'docs'
 Requires-Dist: plotly>=5.0 ; extra == 'plotly'
@@ -95,7 +96,7 @@ data = pd.DataFrame({
 })
 
 did = DifferenceInDifferences()
-results = did.fit(data, outcome='outcome', treatment='treated', time='post')
+results = did.fit(data, outcome='outcome', treatment='treated', post='post')
 print(results)              # DiDResults(ATT=3.0000, SE=1.7321, p=0.1583)
 results.print_summary()     # full statsmodels-style table
 ```
@@ -143,9 +144,9 @@ For rigorous DiD analysis, follow these 8 steps. Skipping diagnostic steps produ
 2. **State identification assumptions** - which parallel trends variant (unconditional, conditional, PT-GT-Nev, PT-GT-NYT), no-anticipation, overlap.
 3. **Test parallel trends** - simple 2x2: `check_parallel_trends()`, `equivalence_test_trends()`; staggered: inspect CS event-study pre-period coefficients (generic PT tests are invalid for staggered designs). Insignificant pre-trends do NOT prove PT holds.
 4. **Choose estimator** - staggered adoption -> CS/SA/BJS (NOT plain TWFE); few treated units -> SDiD; factor confounding -> TROP; simple 2x2 -> DiD. Run `BaconDecomposition` to diagnose TWFE bias.
-5. **Estimate** - `estimator.fit(data, ...)`. Always print the cluster count first and choose inference method based on the result (cluster-robust if >= 50 clusters, wild bootstrap if fewer).
-6. **Sensitivity analysis** - `compute_honest_did(results)` for bounds under PT violations (MultiPeriodDiD, CS, or dCDH), `run_all_placebo_tests()` for 2x2 falsification, specification comparisons for staggered designs.
-7. **Heterogeneity** - CS: `aggregate='group'`/`'event_study'`; SA: `results.event_study_effects` / `to_dataframe(level='cohort')`; subgroup re-estimation.
+5. **Estimate** - `estimator.fit(data, ...)`. Always print the cluster count first and choose inference method based on the result (cluster-robust if >= 50 clusters, wild bootstrap if fewer - for DifferenceInDifferences pass `cluster=`; TwoWayFixedEffects auto-clusters at unit level).
+6. **Sensitivity analysis** - `compute_honest_did(results)` for bounds under PT violations (MultiPeriodDiD, CS, or dCDH natively; the TwoWayFixedEffects `event_study=True` surface and a StackedDiD `results.aggregate('event_study')` container also admit - Stacked needs `kappa_pre >= 2`), `run_all_placebo_tests()` for 2x2 falsification, specification comparisons for staggered designs.
+7. **Heterogeneity** - CS: `results.aggregate('group')`/`'event_study'` (post-fit, no refit); SA: `results.event_study_effects` / `to_dataframe(level='cohort')`; Stacked: `results.aggregate('event_study')`/`'simple'` post-fit views (surface always computed since 3.9); EDiD: `results.aggregate(...)` post-fit from retained EIFs (3.9); ImputationDiD/TwoStageDiD: `results.aggregate(...)` post-fit from panel-backed kits (3.9); ContinuousDiD: `results.aggregate('dose'/'simple'/'event_study')` post-fit (3.9; dose/simple are views, event_study recomputes); subgroup re-estimation.
 8. **Robustness** - compare 2-3 estimators (CS vs SA vs BJS), report with and without covariates (shows whether conditioning drives identification), present pre-trends and sensitivity bounds.
 
 Full guide: `diff_diff.get_llm_guide("practitioner")`.
@@ -154,7 +155,7 @@ Full guide: `diff_diff.get_llm_guide("practitioner")`.
 
 - [DifferenceInDifferences](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/estimators.html) - basic 2x2 DiD with robust/cluster-robust SEs, wild bootstrap, formula interface, and fixed effects
 - [TwoWayFixedEffects](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/estimators.html) - panel data DiD with unit and time fixed effects via within-transformation or dummies
-- [MultiPeriodDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/estimators.html) - event study design with period-specific treatment effects for dynamic analysis
+- [MultiPeriodDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/estimators.html) - event study design with period-specific treatment effects for dynamic analysis (deprecated 3.9 - use TwoWayFixedEffects `event_study=True`)
 - [CallawaySantAnna](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/staggered.html) - Callaway & Sant'Anna (2021) group-time ATT estimator for staggered adoption
 - [ChaisemartinDHaultfoeuille](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/chaisemartin_dhaultfoeuille.html) - de Chaisemartin & D'Haultfœuille (2020/2022) for **reversible (non-absorbing) treatments** with multi-horizon event study, normalized effects, cost-benefit delta, sup-t bands, and dynamic placebos. The most general option for treatments that switch on AND off (see also `LPDiD`/`TROP` `non_absorbing`). Alias `DCDH`.
 - [SunAbraham](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/staggered.html) - Sun & Abraham (2021) interaction-weighted estimator for heterogeneity-robust event studies
@@ -163,24 +164,28 @@ Full guide: `diff_diff.get_llm_guide("practitioner")`.
 - [SpilloverDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/spillover.html) - Butts (2021) ring-indicator spillover-aware DiD identifying direct effect on treated + per-ring spillover on near-control units; handles non-staggered and staggered timing; supports survey-design variance under `survey_design=` for HC1 / CR1 (Wave E.1 Binder TSL) and Conley (Wave E.2 panel-aware stratified-Conley sandwich on per-period PSU totals; extended in Wave E.2 follow-up to `conley_lag_cutoff > 0` via panel-block composition with within-PSU serial Bartlett HAC — `lag>0` requires an effective PSU via explicit `survey_design.psu` or injected `cluster=<col>`); `SurveyDesign.subpopulation()` preserves full-design `n_psu` / `df_survey` via zero-padded scores (Wave E.3, R `svyrecvar(subset())` form)
 - [SyntheticDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/estimators.html) - Synthetic DiD combining standard DiD and synthetic control for few treated units
 - [SyntheticControl](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/synthetic_control.html) - Abadie, Diamond & Hainmueller (2010) classic synthetic control for a single treated unit (donor-weight counterfactual, nested/cv/inverse-variance/custom V; in-space placebo permutation inference via `in_space_placebo()`, plus ADH-2015 `leave_one_out()` + `in_time_placebo()` robustness, Firpo-Possebom (2018) test-inversion confidence sets, and Chernozhukov-Wüthrich-Zhu (2021) conformal inference)
-- [TripleDifference](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/triple_diff.html) - triple difference (DDD) estimator for designs requiring two criteria for treatment eligibility
+- [TripleDifference](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/triple_diff.html) - triple difference (DDD) estimator for designs requiring two criteria for treatment eligibility; serves both the 2x2x2 and the staggered-adoption design from one signature (`fit(..., first_treat=)` selects the staggered engine)
 - [ContinuousDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/continuous_did.html) - Callaway, Goodman-Bacon & Sant'Anna (2024) continuous treatment DiD with dose-response curves
 - [HeterogeneousAdoptionDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/had.html) - de Chaisemartin, Ciccia, D'Haultfœuille & Knau (2026) for designs where **no unit remains untreated**; local-linear estimator at the dose support boundary returning Weighted Average Slope (WAS) on Design 1' (`d̲ = 0` / QUG) or `WAS_{d̲}` on Design 1 (`d̲ > 0`, continuous-near-d̲ or mass-point), with a multi-period event-study extension (last-treatment cohort, pointwise CIs). **Panel-only** in this release - repeated cross-sections rejected by the validator. Alias `HAD`.
+- [RegressionDiscontinuity](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/regression_discontinuity.html) - Calonico, Cattaneo & Titiunik (2014) sharp, fuzzy, AND covariate-adjusted regression discontinuity with robust bias-corrected inference and rdrobust-parity bandwidth selection (all 10 selectors, mass-point handling; fuzzy via `takeup=` with a first-stage block and weak-identification warning; covariates via `covariates=` - CCFT 2019, same estimand, covariate-aware bandwidths). Canonical `att` is the bias-corrected estimate with a coherent robust CI (rdrobust's printed headline is `att_conventional`). Alias `RDD`.
 - [StackedDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/stacked_did.html) - Wing, Freedman & Hollingsworth (2024) stacked DiD with Q-weights and sub-experiments; optional covariate balancing (Ustyuzhanin 2026)
 - [EfficientDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/efficient_did.html) - Chen, Sant'Anna & Xie (2025) efficient DiD with optimal weighting for tighter SEs
 - [TROP](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/trop.html) - Triply Robust Panel estimator (Athey et al. 2025) with nuclear norm factor adjustment
-- [StaggeredTripleDifference](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/staggered.html#staggeredtripledifference) - Ortiz-Villavicencio & Sant'Anna (2025) staggered DDD with group-time ATT
+- [StaggeredTripleDifference](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/staggered.html#staggeredtripledifference) - Ortiz-Villavicencio & Sant'Anna (2025) staggered DDD with group-time ATT (deprecated 3.9 - use `TripleDifference` with `first_treat=`)
 - [WooldridgeDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/wooldridge_etwfe.html) - Wooldridge (2023, 2025) ETWFE: saturated OLS, logit/Poisson QMLE (ASF-based ATT). Alias `ETWFE`.
 - [LPDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/lpdid.html) - Dube, Girardi, Jorda & Taylor (2025) Local Projections DiD: per-horizon long-difference event study on clean controls (no negative weighting), variance- or equally-weighted ATT, for absorbing or non-absorbing (reversible) treatment
+- [ChangesInChanges](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/changes_in_changes.html) - Athey & Imbens (2006) nonlinear/distributional DiD for the 2x2 design: full counterfactual distribution and quantile treatment effects via CDF transformation, plus the QDiD comparison estimator via `method="qdid"`; bootstrap inference; R qte parity. Alias `CiC`
 - [BaconDecomposition](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/bacon.html) - Goodman-Bacon (2021) decomposition for diagnosing TWFE bias in staggered settings
 
 ## Diagnostics & Sensitivity
 
+- [RD Plots](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/regression_discontinuity.html) - Calonico, Cattaneo & Titiunik (2015) optimal data-driven RD plots (`RDPlot`): all 8 rdrobust `binselect` bin selectors, implied-scale/WIMSE-weight reporting, optional matplotlib rendering
 - [Parallel Trends Testing](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/diagnostics.html) - simple and Wasserstein-robust parallel trends tests, equivalence testing (TOST)
 - [Placebo Tests](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/diagnostics.html) - placebo timing, group, permutation, leave-one-out
 - [Honest DiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/honest_did.html) - Rambachan & Roth (2023) sensitivity analysis: robust CI under PT violations, breakdown values
 - [Pre-Trends Power Analysis](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/pretrends.html) - Roth (2022) minimum detectable violation and power curves
 - [Power Analysis](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/power.html) - analytical and simulation-based MDE, sample size, power curves for study design
+- [MMM Calibration Export](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/mmm.html) - convert experiment results into MMM calibration inputs: PyMC-Marketing lift-test frames and Google Meridian lognormal ROI priors
 - Conley spatial HAC SE (`vcov_type="conley"`) on cross-sectional `LinearRegression` / `compute_robust_vcov` plus panel `DifferenceInDifferences` / `MultiPeriodDiD` / `TwoWayFixedEffects` (with `conley_lag_cutoff` for within-unit Bartlett temporal HAC) - Conley (1999) spatial-correlation-aware SEs with parity vs R `conleyreg` on cross-sectional + panel fixtures, optional combined spatial + cluster product kernel via explicit `cluster=`, auto-activating sparse k-d-tree fast path for `n > 5_000`
 
 ## Survey Support

{diff_diff-3.7.0 → diff_diff-3.9.0}/README.md

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ data = pd.DataFrame({
 })
 
 did = DifferenceInDifferences()
-results = did.fit(data, outcome='outcome', treatment='treated', time='post')
+results = did.fit(data, outcome='outcome', treatment='treated', post='post')
 print(results)              # DiDResults(ATT=3.0000, SE=1.7321, p=0.1583)
 results.print_summary()     # full statsmodels-style table
 ```
@@ -89,9 +89,9 @@ For rigorous DiD analysis, follow these 8 steps. Skipping diagnostic steps produ
 2. **State identification assumptions** - which parallel trends variant (unconditional, conditional, PT-GT-Nev, PT-GT-NYT), no-anticipation, overlap.
 3. **Test parallel trends** - simple 2x2: `check_parallel_trends()`, `equivalence_test_trends()`; staggered: inspect CS event-study pre-period coefficients (generic PT tests are invalid for staggered designs). Insignificant pre-trends do NOT prove PT holds.
 4. **Choose estimator** - staggered adoption -> CS/SA/BJS (NOT plain TWFE); few treated units -> SDiD; factor confounding -> TROP; simple 2x2 -> DiD. Run `BaconDecomposition` to diagnose TWFE bias.
-5. **Estimate** - `estimator.fit(data, ...)`. Always print the cluster count first and choose inference method based on the result (cluster-robust if >= 50 clusters, wild bootstrap if fewer).
-6. **Sensitivity analysis** - `compute_honest_did(results)` for bounds under PT violations (MultiPeriodDiD, CS, or dCDH), `run_all_placebo_tests()` for 2x2 falsification, specification comparisons for staggered designs.
-7. **Heterogeneity** - CS: `aggregate='group'`/`'event_study'`; SA: `results.event_study_effects` / `to_dataframe(level='cohort')`; subgroup re-estimation.
+5. **Estimate** - `estimator.fit(data, ...)`. Always print the cluster count first and choose inference method based on the result (cluster-robust if >= 50 clusters, wild bootstrap if fewer - for DifferenceInDifferences pass `cluster=`; TwoWayFixedEffects auto-clusters at unit level).
+6. **Sensitivity analysis** - `compute_honest_did(results)` for bounds under PT violations (MultiPeriodDiD, CS, or dCDH natively; the TwoWayFixedEffects `event_study=True` surface and a StackedDiD `results.aggregate('event_study')` container also admit - Stacked needs `kappa_pre >= 2`), `run_all_placebo_tests()` for 2x2 falsification, specification comparisons for staggered designs.
+7. **Heterogeneity** - CS: `results.aggregate('group')`/`'event_study'` (post-fit, no refit); SA: `results.event_study_effects` / `to_dataframe(level='cohort')`; Stacked: `results.aggregate('event_study')`/`'simple'` post-fit views (surface always computed since 3.9); EDiD: `results.aggregate(...)` post-fit from retained EIFs (3.9); ImputationDiD/TwoStageDiD: `results.aggregate(...)` post-fit from panel-backed kits (3.9); ContinuousDiD: `results.aggregate('dose'/'simple'/'event_study')` post-fit (3.9; dose/simple are views, event_study recomputes); subgroup re-estimation.
 8. **Robustness** - compare 2-3 estimators (CS vs SA vs BJS), report with and without covariates (shows whether conditioning drives identification), present pre-trends and sensitivity bounds.
 
 Full guide: `diff_diff.get_llm_guide("practitioner")`.
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ Full guide: `diff_diff.get_llm_guide("practitioner")`.
 
 - [DifferenceInDifferences](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/estimators.html) - basic 2x2 DiD with robust/cluster-robust SEs, wild bootstrap, formula interface, and fixed effects
 - [TwoWayFixedEffects](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/estimators.html) - panel data DiD with unit and time fixed effects via within-transformation or dummies
-- [MultiPeriodDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/estimators.html) - event study design with period-specific treatment effects for dynamic analysis
+- [MultiPeriodDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/estimators.html) - event study design with period-specific treatment effects for dynamic analysis (deprecated 3.9 - use TwoWayFixedEffects `event_study=True`)
 - [CallawaySantAnna](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/staggered.html) - Callaway & Sant'Anna (2021) group-time ATT estimator for staggered adoption
 - [ChaisemartinDHaultfoeuille](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/chaisemartin_dhaultfoeuille.html) - de Chaisemartin & D'Haultfœuille (2020/2022) for **reversible (non-absorbing) treatments** with multi-horizon event study, normalized effects, cost-benefit delta, sup-t bands, and dynamic placebos. The most general option for treatments that switch on AND off (see also `LPDiD`/`TROP` `non_absorbing`). Alias `DCDH`.
 - [SunAbraham](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/staggered.html) - Sun & Abraham (2021) interaction-weighted estimator for heterogeneity-robust event studies
@@ -109,24 +109,28 @@ Full guide: `diff_diff.get_llm_guide("practitioner")`.
 - [SpilloverDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/spillover.html) - Butts (2021) ring-indicator spillover-aware DiD identifying direct effect on treated + per-ring spillover on near-control units; handles non-staggered and staggered timing; supports survey-design variance under `survey_design=` for HC1 / CR1 (Wave E.1 Binder TSL) and Conley (Wave E.2 panel-aware stratified-Conley sandwich on per-period PSU totals; extended in Wave E.2 follow-up to `conley_lag_cutoff > 0` via panel-block composition with within-PSU serial Bartlett HAC — `lag>0` requires an effective PSU via explicit `survey_design.psu` or injected `cluster=<col>`); `SurveyDesign.subpopulation()` preserves full-design `n_psu` / `df_survey` via zero-padded scores (Wave E.3, R `svyrecvar(subset())` form)
 - [SyntheticDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/estimators.html) - Synthetic DiD combining standard DiD and synthetic control for few treated units
 - [SyntheticControl](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/synthetic_control.html) - Abadie, Diamond & Hainmueller (2010) classic synthetic control for a single treated unit (donor-weight counterfactual, nested/cv/inverse-variance/custom V; in-space placebo permutation inference via `in_space_placebo()`, plus ADH-2015 `leave_one_out()` + `in_time_placebo()` robustness, Firpo-Possebom (2018) test-inversion confidence sets, and Chernozhukov-Wüthrich-Zhu (2021) conformal inference)
-- [TripleDifference](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/triple_diff.html) - triple difference (DDD) estimator for designs requiring two criteria for treatment eligibility
+- [TripleDifference](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/triple_diff.html) - triple difference (DDD) estimator for designs requiring two criteria for treatment eligibility; serves both the 2x2x2 and the staggered-adoption design from one signature (`fit(..., first_treat=)` selects the staggered engine)
 - [ContinuousDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/continuous_did.html) - Callaway, Goodman-Bacon & Sant'Anna (2024) continuous treatment DiD with dose-response curves
 - [HeterogeneousAdoptionDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/had.html) - de Chaisemartin, Ciccia, D'Haultfœuille & Knau (2026) for designs where **no unit remains untreated**; local-linear estimator at the dose support boundary returning Weighted Average Slope (WAS) on Design 1' (`d̲ = 0` / QUG) or `WAS_{d̲}` on Design 1 (`d̲ > 0`, continuous-near-d̲ or mass-point), with a multi-period event-study extension (last-treatment cohort, pointwise CIs). **Panel-only** in this release - repeated cross-sections rejected by the validator. Alias `HAD`.
+- [RegressionDiscontinuity](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/regression_discontinuity.html) - Calonico, Cattaneo & Titiunik (2014) sharp, fuzzy, AND covariate-adjusted regression discontinuity with robust bias-corrected inference and rdrobust-parity bandwidth selection (all 10 selectors, mass-point handling; fuzzy via `takeup=` with a first-stage block and weak-identification warning; covariates via `covariates=` - CCFT 2019, same estimand, covariate-aware bandwidths). Canonical `att` is the bias-corrected estimate with a coherent robust CI (rdrobust's printed headline is `att_conventional`). Alias `RDD`.
 - [StackedDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/stacked_did.html) - Wing, Freedman & Hollingsworth (2024) stacked DiD with Q-weights and sub-experiments; optional covariate balancing (Ustyuzhanin 2026)
 - [EfficientDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/efficient_did.html) - Chen, Sant'Anna & Xie (2025) efficient DiD with optimal weighting for tighter SEs
 - [TROP](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/trop.html) - Triply Robust Panel estimator (Athey et al. 2025) with nuclear norm factor adjustment
-- [StaggeredTripleDifference](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/staggered.html#staggeredtripledifference) - Ortiz-Villavicencio & Sant'Anna (2025) staggered DDD with group-time ATT
+- [StaggeredTripleDifference](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/staggered.html#staggeredtripledifference) - Ortiz-Villavicencio & Sant'Anna (2025) staggered DDD with group-time ATT (deprecated 3.9 - use `TripleDifference` with `first_treat=`)
 - [WooldridgeDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/wooldridge_etwfe.html) - Wooldridge (2023, 2025) ETWFE: saturated OLS, logit/Poisson QMLE (ASF-based ATT). Alias `ETWFE`.
 - [LPDiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/lpdid.html) - Dube, Girardi, Jorda & Taylor (2025) Local Projections DiD: per-horizon long-difference event study on clean controls (no negative weighting), variance- or equally-weighted ATT, for absorbing or non-absorbing (reversible) treatment
+- [ChangesInChanges](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/changes_in_changes.html) - Athey & Imbens (2006) nonlinear/distributional DiD for the 2x2 design: full counterfactual distribution and quantile treatment effects via CDF transformation, plus the QDiD comparison estimator via `method="qdid"`; bootstrap inference; R qte parity. Alias `CiC`
 - [BaconDecomposition](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/bacon.html) - Goodman-Bacon (2021) decomposition for diagnosing TWFE bias in staggered settings
 
 ## Diagnostics & Sensitivity
 
+- [RD Plots](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/regression_discontinuity.html) - Calonico, Cattaneo & Titiunik (2015) optimal data-driven RD plots (`RDPlot`): all 8 rdrobust `binselect` bin selectors, implied-scale/WIMSE-weight reporting, optional matplotlib rendering
 - [Parallel Trends Testing](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/diagnostics.html) - simple and Wasserstein-robust parallel trends tests, equivalence testing (TOST)
 - [Placebo Tests](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/diagnostics.html) - placebo timing, group, permutation, leave-one-out
 - [Honest DiD](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/honest_did.html) - Rambachan & Roth (2023) sensitivity analysis: robust CI under PT violations, breakdown values
 - [Pre-Trends Power Analysis](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/pretrends.html) - Roth (2022) minimum detectable violation and power curves
 - [Power Analysis](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/power.html) - analytical and simulation-based MDE, sample size, power curves for study design
+- [MMM Calibration Export](https://diff-diff.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/mmm.html) - convert experiment results into MMM calibration inputs: PyMC-Marketing lift-test frames and Google Meridian lognormal ROI priors
 - Conley spatial HAC SE (`vcov_type="conley"`) on cross-sectional `LinearRegression` / `compute_robust_vcov` plus panel `DifferenceInDifferences` / `MultiPeriodDiD` / `TwoWayFixedEffects` (with `conley_lag_cutoff` for within-unit Bartlett temporal HAC) - Conley (1999) spatial-correlation-aware SEs with parity vs R `conleyreg` on cross-sectional + panel fixtures, optional combined spatial + cluster product kernel via explicit `cluster=`, auto-activating sparse k-d-tree fast path for `n > 5_000`
 
 ## Survey Support