create-leafmesh 2.6.0__tar.gz → 2.6.1__tar.gz

{create_leafmesh-2.6.0 → create_leafmesh-2.6.1}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: create-leafmesh
-Version: 2.6.0
+Version: 2.6.1
 Summary: Project scaffolding + cloud-deploy tool for LeafMesh
 License-Expression: MIT
 Requires-Python: >=3.10

{create_leafmesh-2.6.0 → create_leafmesh-2.6.1}/create_leafmesh/__init__.py

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 """create-leafmesh — Project scaffolding + cloud-deploy tool for LeafMesh."""
 
-__version__ = "2.6.0"
+__version__ = "2.6.1"

{create_leafmesh-2.6.0 → create_leafmesh-2.6.1}/create_leafmesh/templates/_registry.yaml

@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ templates:
     one_line: "Ticket → triage → sentiment → KB → draft → QA → escalation."
     industries: ["saas", "services", "any with support"]
     roi_cells: ["supp × saas"]
-    agent_count: 14
+    agent_count: 15
     cron_count: 0
     trust_lead: "customer visibility — sentiment-aware, escalation default-deny on low confidence"
     complexity: "medium"
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ templates:
     one_line: "Health score → risk → playbook → QBR → renewal — proactive."
     industries: ["saas"]
     roi_cells: ["cs × saas"]
-    agent_count: 15
+    agent_count: 16
     cron_count: 1
     trust_lead: "customer visibility — high — save-play actions HITL-gated"
     complexity: "high"
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ templates:
     one_line: "RFP → past-proposal → draft → pricing → compliance."
     industries: ["services"]
     roi_cells: ["bd × services"]
-    agent_count: 14
+    agent_count: 15
     cron_count: 0
     trust_lead: "customer — legal compliance reviewer + practice-lead HITL on pricing"
     complexity: "medium"
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ templates:
     one_line: "RFQ → cost calc → discount policy → approval → quote."
     industries: ["goods", "services"]
     roi_cells: ["price × goods"]
-    agent_count: 13
+    agent_count: 14
     cron_count: 0
     trust_lead: "customer + regulator (margin policy) — discount approval HITL-gated"
     complexity: "medium"
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ templates:
     one_line: "Brief → context → research → analysis → draft → QA."
     industries: ["services", "saas (PS arm)"]
     roi_cells: ["util × services", "hours × services"]
-    agent_count: 18
+    agent_count: 19
     cron_count: 1
     trust_lead: "customer — engagement-lead HITL on final delivery"
     complexity: "high"
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ templates:
     one_line: "Forecast → skills match → allocate → idle-detect."
     industries: ["services"]
     roi_cells: ["bench × services"]
-    agent_count: 11
+    agent_count: 12
     cron_count: 0
     trust_lead: "internal — staffing-partner HITL on allocation conflicts"
     complexity: "medium"
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ templates:
     one_line: "Order intake → inventory check → supplier sourcing → PO → goods receipt."
     industries: ["goods", "services"]
     roi_cells: ["procurement × goods"]
-    agent_count: 11
+    agent_count: 12
     cron_count: 1
     trust_lead: "operations-manager HITL on order approval; po-approver HITL before formal PO issuance; hash-chained audit on every state change"
     complexity: "high"

{create_leafmesh-2.6.0 → create_leafmesh-2.6.1}/create_leafmesh/templates/bd-proposals/agency/_shared/store.py

@@ -168,6 +168,78 @@ _CONTRACT_SEED: dict[str, Any] = {
     },
 }
 
+# Approved-proposal content — the drafted sections + priced package +
+# compliance attestations, keyed by rfp_id. In production this is the
+# DMS / proposal-authoring system of record that the drafting + pricing
+# + contracts chain writes into; the proposal_assembler reads the
+# APPROVED package from here when a post-HITL run has lost upstream_yields
+# (just like the procurement PO executor recovers its plan). The seed
+# carries a fully-approved package so the assembler renders a real file
+# on day 0. compliance_flags / pricing_flags are EMPTY here — a clean,
+# approved package the fail-closed floor will let through.
+_APPROVED_PROPOSAL_SEED: dict[str, Any] = {
+    "RFP-2026-08813": {
+        "rfp_id": "RFP-2026-08813",
+        "client_org": "State Department of Transportation — Region IV",
+        "practice_area": "infrastructure_advisory",
+        "approved": True,
+        "approval_reference": "APPROVED-PARTNER",
+        "compliance_flags": [],
+        "pricing_flags": [],
+        "compliance_attestations": [
+            {"framework": "NDA", "status": "met",
+             "note": "Mutual NDA executed; data-handling addendum attached."},
+            {"framework": "FedRAMP", "status": "met",
+             "note": "Hosting on FedRAMP-Moderate authorized environment."},
+        ],
+        "sections": [
+            {"title": "Executive Summary",
+             "body": ("Our firm proposes a five-year roadmap-consulting "
+                      "engagement for the I-95 corridor modernisation, "
+                      "combining traffic modelling, environmental review, and "
+                      "a federal-funding strategy proven on two prior State "
+                      "DOT wins.")},
+            {"title": "Approach",
+             "body": ("A three-phase approach: (1) baseline traffic + "
+                      "environmental assessment, (2) corridor modernisation "
+                      "options modelling, (3) a federal-funding capture plan "
+                      "aligned to FHWA programs.")},
+            {"title": "Team & Qualifications",
+             "body": ("A partner-led team including two former FHWA-adjacent "
+                      "principals and senior transportation consultants who "
+                      "delivered the Region II corridor roadmap (ENG-2024-0431).")},
+            {"title": "Timeline",
+             "body": ("18-month base period with two option years; phase-gate "
+                      "reviews quarterly.")},
+            {"title": "Case Studies",
+             "body": ("State DOT Region II corridor modernisation (won, "
+                      "$880k) and Metro Transit light-rail environmental "
+                      "review (won, $640k).")},
+        ],
+        "pricing": {
+            "currency": "USD",
+            "total_cents": 92000000,
+            "discount_pct": 6,
+            "within_band": True,
+            "line_items": [
+                {"item": "Partner oversight", "role_or_sku": "partner",
+                 "quantity": 40, "unit_cents": 650000, "subtotal_cents": 26000000},
+                {"item": "Principal lead", "role_or_sku": "principal",
+                 "quantity": 60, "unit_cents": 480000, "subtotal_cents": 28800000},
+                {"item": "Senior consulting", "role_or_sku": "senior_consultant",
+                 "quantity": 90, "unit_cents": 320000, "subtotal_cents": 28800000},
+                {"item": "Analyst support", "role_or_sku": "analyst",
+                 "quantity": 60, "unit_cents": 140000, "subtotal_cents": 8400000},
+            ],
+        },
+        "terms": [
+            "Net 30 payment terms.",
+            "Liability capped at 12 months of fees.",
+            "Client owns all deliverables produced under this engagement.",
+        ],
+    },
+}
+
 # Win/loss history — what the bid/no-bid strategist reasons over.
 _WIN_LOSS_SEED: list[dict[str, Any]] = [
     {
@@ -337,6 +409,29 @@ def compliance_must_haves(rfp_id: str) -> list[str]:
     return [str(r) for r in req] if isinstance(req, list) else []
 
 
+# ── Approved-proposal content (the assembler source) ─────────────────
+def approved_proposal(rfp_id: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """The APPROVED proposal package (sections + pricing + compliance
+    attestations) for an rfp_id ({} if none). PROD: DMS / proposal-
+    authoring system read. Used by proposal_assembler_agent to recover the
+    approved content after the HITL gate drops upstream_yields."""
+    if not rfp_id:
+        return {}
+    return _seeded("approved_proposals", _APPROVED_PROPOSAL_SEED).get(rfp_id, {})
+
+
+def put_approved_proposal(rfp_id: str, package: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Persist (or merge) an approved proposal package keyed by rfp_id so
+    the assembler can recover it post-HITL. Returns the stored record."""
+    with _LOCK:
+        data = _seeded("approved_proposals", _APPROVED_PROPOSAL_SEED)
+        rid = rfp_id or package.get("rfp_id") or _new_id("rfp")
+        package = {**package, "rfp_id": rid, "updated_at": _now()}
+        data[rid] = {**data.get(rid, {}), **package}
+        _save("approved_proposals", data)
+        return data[rid]
+
+
 # ── Competitor signals (the competitive-intel source) ────────────────
 def competitor_signals(practice_area: str = "", competitor: str = "") -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
     """Competitor signals from the firm's CRM / intel store, optionally