costwright 0.1.0__tar.gz

costwright-0.1.0/LICENSE

@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+
+                                 Apache License
+                           Version 2.0, January 2004
+                        http://www.apache.org/licenses/
+
+   TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
+
+   1. Definitions.
+
+      "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
+      and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
+
+      "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
+      the copyright owner that is granting the License.
+
+      "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
+      other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
+      control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
+      "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
+      direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
+      otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
+      outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
+
+      "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
+      exercising permissions granted by this License.
+
+      "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
+      including but not limited to software source code, documentation
+      source, and configuration files.
+
+      "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
+      transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
+      not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
+      and conversions to other media types.
+
+      "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
+      Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
+      copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
+      (an example is provided in the Appendix below).
+
+      "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
+      form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
+      editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
+      represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
+      of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
+      separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
+      the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
+
+      "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
+      the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
+      to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
+      submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
+      or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
+      the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
+      means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
+      to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
+      communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
+      and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
+      Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
+      excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
+      designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
+
+      "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
+      on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
+      subsequently incorporated within the Work.
+
+   2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
+      this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
+      worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
+      copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
+      publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
+      Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
+
+   3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
+      this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
+      worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
+      (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
+      use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
+      where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
+      by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
+      Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
+      with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
+      institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
+      cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
+      or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
+      or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
+      granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
+      as of the date such litigation is filed.
+
+   4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
+      Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
+      modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
+      meet the following conditions:
+
+      (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
+          Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
+
+      (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
+          stating that You changed the files; and
+
+      (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
+          that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
+          attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
+          excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
+          the Derivative Works; and
+
+      (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
+          distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
+          include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
+          within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
+          pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
+          of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
+          as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
+          documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
+          within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
+          wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
+          of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
+          do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
+          notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
+          or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
+          that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
+          as modifying the License.
+
+      You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
+      may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
+      for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
+      for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
+      reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
+      the conditions stated in this License.
+
+   5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
+      any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
+      by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
+      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
+      Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
+      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
+      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
+
+   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
+      names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
+      except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
+      origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
+
+   7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
+      agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
+      Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+      WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
+      implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
+      of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
+      PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
+      appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
+      risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
+
+   8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
+      whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
+      unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
+      negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
+      liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
+      incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
+      result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
+      Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
+      work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
+      other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
+      has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
+
+   9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
+      the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
+      and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
+      or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
+      License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
+      on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
+      of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
+      defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
+      incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
+      of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
+
+   END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
+
+   APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
+
+      To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
+      boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
+      replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
+      the brackets!)  The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
+      comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
+      file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
+      same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
+      identification within third-party archives.
+
+   Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
+
+   Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+   you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+   You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+   limitations under the License.

costwright-0.1.0/PKG-INFO

@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+Metadata-Version: 2.4
+Name: costwright
+Version: 0.1.0
+Summary: Static budget certificates for LLM-agent workflows (LangGraph / CrewAI / OpenAI Agents SDK). Backed by a machine-checked (Lean 4) cost-soundness theorem.
+Author: Hernán Inverso
+License: Apache-2.0
+Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/hernaninverso/costwright
+Project-URL: Paper, https://github.com/hernaninverso/typed-resources
+Keywords: llm,agents,budget,static-analysis,langgraph,crewai,cost
+Classifier: Development Status :: 4 - Beta
+Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
+Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
+Classifier: Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance
+Requires-Python: >=3.10
+Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
+License-File: LICENSE
+Dynamic: license-file
+
+# costwright
+
+[![Paper DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.20661092.svg)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20661092)
+
+**Static budget certificates for LLM-agent workflows.** Point it at your LangGraph / CrewAI /
+OpenAI-Agents-SDK repo and it tells you — *before anything runs* — the worst-case budget ceiling of
+every workflow graph, where that ceiling comes from, and when it is effectively vacuous.
+
+Backed by a machine-checked (Lean 4) cost-soundness theorem:
+[*A Potential-Based Calculus for Resource Bounds of LLM-Agent Workflows*](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20661092) ([repo](https://github.com/hernaninverso/typed-resources))
+— well-typed ⟹ spend ≤ declared budget, on every trace. costwright is the static frontend of that
+calculus. It **never executes your code** (pure AST analysis, zero dependencies).
+
+```
+pip install git+https://github.com/hernaninverso/costwright.git   # PyPI release coming soon
+costwright check .
+```
+
+```
+costwright — budget certificate check  (schema costwright.v1)
+
+  ▲ src/agents/researcher.py :42   default_dependent  ≤1000 supersteps (framework_default)
+  ‼ scripts/run_forever.py   :17   runaway            while-true-driver
+  ✗ src/agents/fanout.py     :88   non_certifiable    send-fanout
+
+  12 graph units | ✓ 3 certifiable | ▲ 7 default-dependent | ✗ 1 non-certifiable | ‼ 1 runaway
+
+  ⚠ 6 unit(s) rely on a framework default of ≥1000 supersteps (LangGraph ≥1.0.6) —
+    that budget ceiling is effectively vacuous. Set recursion_limit explicitly.
+```
+
+## Why
+
+We measured **254 real agent workflows** from 45 public production-grade repos:
+
+- **88%** of cyclic workflows rely on a *framework default* for their only budget bound — or have
+  none at all.
+- LangGraph's modern default (`recursion_limit`) is **1000 supersteps** (it was 25 before v1.0.6).
+  A "protected" workflow can take a thousand turns before the framework stops it.
+- Only **12%** of LLM calls in real code carry an explicit token cap.
+
+A runtime budget tracker tells you what you spent — after you spent it. A *static* certificate
+tells you the worst case before you deploy, rejects the runaway pattern at check time, and the
+math behind the bound is machine-checked, not vibes.
+
+<sub>Methodology disclosure: dataset is ~80% LangGraph (204/254 units; CrewAI and Agents-SDK
+samples are small); units cluster ~5.6 per repo; public-GitHub visibility bias applies; LangGraph
+version assumed ≥1.0.6 (default 1000) where undeclared; false-reject 0 was measured on N=3
+surviving rejects. Full experiment: spec, frozen dataset, and audit trail in this repo's
+`specs/` and `results/`.</sub>
+
+## Commands
+
+### `costwright check [path]`
+
+Maps every workflow graph to the typed-budget calculus and reports, per graph unit:
+
+| Category | Meaning |
+|---|---|
+| `certifiable` | bound is explicit in your code — real certificate |
+| `default_dependent` | bound exists only via a framework default (often vacuous) |
+| `non_certifiable` | uses a construct outside the calculus (Send fan-out, interrupts, hierarchical manager, dynamic goto, subgraph-as-node) |
+| `runaway` | genuinely unbounded (`while True` driver, `max_turns=None`, astronomically large limit) |
+| `parse_error` | the analyzer could not reconstruct the graph (reported, never silent) |
+
+- `--json` → stable [`costwright.v1`](#json-schema) output for CI/tooling.
+- `--fail-on reject|default-dependent|non-certifiable` → exit 1 on policy violation
+  (default: **never fails** — findings are warnings; strictness is opt-in).
+- Exit codes: `0` ran fine, `1` policy violated, `2` infrastructure error. Never anything else.
+
+### `costwright caps [path]`
+
+Finds LLM constructors without a token cap and tells you the **right parameter for that provider**
+(it is parameter-specific, not provider-specific — verified against primary provider docs):
+
+- OpenAI Responses → `max_output_tokens` (bounds reasoning+output)
+- Azure/OpenAI reasoning (Chat) → `max_completion_tokens` (reasoning tokens are inside it)
+- Anthropic standard → `max_tokens` (with `budget_tokens < max_tokens`); **interleaved/adaptive
+  thinking degrades the ceiling** (budget may exceed `max_tokens`) — flagged
+- Gemini → `max_output_tokens` **plus** `thinking_budget` (thinking is billed as output but NOT
+  bounded by `maxOutputTokens`) — flagged when missing
+
+`--patch out.diff` emits a unified diff (`git apply out.diff`). **costwright never edits your files.**
+
+### `costwright fuse` (experimental)
+
+Bundles a costwright **cost** certificate with an [eleata-verify](https://github.com/hernaninverso/eleata-verify)
+**risk** certificate (a per-output selective-risk SLA) into one tamper-evident `costwright.fusion.v1`
+audit record per agent run — answering both *"will it blow my budget?"* and *"can I trust this
+output, or send it to a human?"*
+
+```bash
+costwright check . --json > cost.json                 # the cost certificate
+# ... your eleata-verify step writes risk.json (VerifyResult.to_dict()) ...
+costwright fuse --cost cost.json --risk risk.json --run-id "$RUN_ID"
+```
+
+It is the **cartesian product** of two independently-scoped certificates — **NOT a composed
+guarantee**: it does not assert the agent is "safe", has no aggregate "both passed" boolean, and does
+not claim a bounded budget preserves the risk SLA. The non-interference theorem (budget ⊥ risk,
+Hoare-style) that would justify composition is **unproven / future work**. The bundler is pure stdlib
+and never imports eleata-verify (costwright's zero-dependency core is intact). See
+[docs/FUSION.md](docs/FUSION.md), [docs/NON-INTERFERENCE.md](docs/NON-INTERFERENCE.md), and the
+runnable `examples/fusion_demo.py`.
+
+### GitHub Action
+
+```yaml
+- uses: hernaninverso/costwright/action@v0.1
+  with:
+    fail-on: reject        # reject | default-dependent | non-certifiable | none
+```
+
+## JSON schema
+
+`costwright.v1` is frozen: closed enums (`category`, `provenance`, `aggregation`), stable `unit_id`,
+line spans only (no source code in output — CI-log safe). New fields are additive in `v2`.
+The `signature` field is reserved (`null` in OSS output): signed, independently verifiable
+certificates are a separate service — contact below.
+
+## What costwright does NOT do (honest scope)
+
+- It does not bound `Send` fan-out, interrupts/human-in-the-loop, CrewAI hierarchical mode,
+  dynamic `goto`, or subgraphs-passed-by-variable — those map to `non_certifiable`, never to a
+  fake bound. Conservative by construction: when in doubt, no certificate.
+- The bound is worst-case (deliberately over-approximate). Tightening it is roadmap.
+- A token-level dollar bound additionally needs caps on every call (`costwright caps`) and a
+  per-provider billing ceiling — see §3.2 of the paper for where that holds and degrades.
+
+## Theory
+
+The calculus (7 constructs, affine potential in the style of Hofmann–Jost AARA), its cost-soundness
+theorem, the relational↔functional equivalence, the termination measure, and the affine
+no-double-spend layer are machine-checked in Lean 4 (no `sorry`; axioms `[propext, Quot.sound]`):
+[hernaninverso/typed-resources](https://github.com/hernaninverso/typed-resources).
+
+## Certification / enterprise
+
+Signed budget certificates (Ed25519, independently verifiable), a live per-provider billing-ceiling
+feed (providers change semantics monthly — your certificate can silently invalidate), and org-level
+CI policy are a paid layer on top of this OSS tool. Contact: hernaninverso@gmail.com.
+
+## License
+
+Apache-2.0.

costwright-0.1.0/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+# costwright
+
+[![Paper DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.20661092.svg)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20661092)
+
+**Static budget certificates for LLM-agent workflows.** Point it at your LangGraph / CrewAI /
+OpenAI-Agents-SDK repo and it tells you — *before anything runs* — the worst-case budget ceiling of
+every workflow graph, where that ceiling comes from, and when it is effectively vacuous.
+
+Backed by a machine-checked (Lean 4) cost-soundness theorem:
+[*A Potential-Based Calculus for Resource Bounds of LLM-Agent Workflows*](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20661092) ([repo](https://github.com/hernaninverso/typed-resources))
+— well-typed ⟹ spend ≤ declared budget, on every trace. costwright is the static frontend of that
+calculus. It **never executes your code** (pure AST analysis, zero dependencies).
+
+```
+pip install git+https://github.com/hernaninverso/costwright.git   # PyPI release coming soon
+costwright check .
+```
+
+```
+costwright — budget certificate check  (schema costwright.v1)
+
+  ▲ src/agents/researcher.py :42   default_dependent  ≤1000 supersteps (framework_default)
+  ‼ scripts/run_forever.py   :17   runaway            while-true-driver
+  ✗ src/agents/fanout.py     :88   non_certifiable    send-fanout
+
+  12 graph units | ✓ 3 certifiable | ▲ 7 default-dependent | ✗ 1 non-certifiable | ‼ 1 runaway
+
+  ⚠ 6 unit(s) rely on a framework default of ≥1000 supersteps (LangGraph ≥1.0.6) —
+    that budget ceiling is effectively vacuous. Set recursion_limit explicitly.
+```
+
+## Why
+
+We measured **254 real agent workflows** from 45 public production-grade repos:
+
+- **88%** of cyclic workflows rely on a *framework default* for their only budget bound — or have
+  none at all.
+- LangGraph's modern default (`recursion_limit`) is **1000 supersteps** (it was 25 before v1.0.6).
+  A "protected" workflow can take a thousand turns before the framework stops it.
+- Only **12%** of LLM calls in real code carry an explicit token cap.
+
+A runtime budget tracker tells you what you spent — after you spent it. A *static* certificate
+tells you the worst case before you deploy, rejects the runaway pattern at check time, and the
+math behind the bound is machine-checked, not vibes.
+
+<sub>Methodology disclosure: dataset is ~80% LangGraph (204/254 units; CrewAI and Agents-SDK
+samples are small); units cluster ~5.6 per repo; public-GitHub visibility bias applies; LangGraph
+version assumed ≥1.0.6 (default 1000) where undeclared; false-reject 0 was measured on N=3
+surviving rejects. Full experiment: spec, frozen dataset, and audit trail in this repo's
+`specs/` and `results/`.</sub>
+
+## Commands
+
+### `costwright check [path]`
+
+Maps every workflow graph to the typed-budget calculus and reports, per graph unit:
+
+| Category | Meaning |
+|---|---|
+| `certifiable` | bound is explicit in your code — real certificate |
+| `default_dependent` | bound exists only via a framework default (often vacuous) |
+| `non_certifiable` | uses a construct outside the calculus (Send fan-out, interrupts, hierarchical manager, dynamic goto, subgraph-as-node) |
+| `runaway` | genuinely unbounded (`while True` driver, `max_turns=None`, astronomically large limit) |
+| `parse_error` | the analyzer could not reconstruct the graph (reported, never silent) |
+
+- `--json` → stable [`costwright.v1`](#json-schema) output for CI/tooling.
+- `--fail-on reject|default-dependent|non-certifiable` → exit 1 on policy violation
+  (default: **never fails** — findings are warnings; strictness is opt-in).
+- Exit codes: `0` ran fine, `1` policy violated, `2` infrastructure error. Never anything else.
+
+### `costwright caps [path]`
+
+Finds LLM constructors without a token cap and tells you the **right parameter for that provider**
+(it is parameter-specific, not provider-specific — verified against primary provider docs):
+
+- OpenAI Responses → `max_output_tokens` (bounds reasoning+output)
+- Azure/OpenAI reasoning (Chat) → `max_completion_tokens` (reasoning tokens are inside it)
+- Anthropic standard → `max_tokens` (with `budget_tokens < max_tokens`); **interleaved/adaptive
+  thinking degrades the ceiling** (budget may exceed `max_tokens`) — flagged
+- Gemini → `max_output_tokens` **plus** `thinking_budget` (thinking is billed as output but NOT
+  bounded by `maxOutputTokens`) — flagged when missing
+
+`--patch out.diff` emits a unified diff (`git apply out.diff`). **costwright never edits your files.**
+
+### `costwright fuse` (experimental)
+
+Bundles a costwright **cost** certificate with an [eleata-verify](https://github.com/hernaninverso/eleata-verify)
+**risk** certificate (a per-output selective-risk SLA) into one tamper-evident `costwright.fusion.v1`
+audit record per agent run — answering both *"will it blow my budget?"* and *"can I trust this
+output, or send it to a human?"*
+
+```bash
+costwright check . --json > cost.json                 # the cost certificate
+# ... your eleata-verify step writes risk.json (VerifyResult.to_dict()) ...
+costwright fuse --cost cost.json --risk risk.json --run-id "$RUN_ID"
+```
+
+It is the **cartesian product** of two independently-scoped certificates — **NOT a composed
+guarantee**: it does not assert the agent is "safe", has no aggregate "both passed" boolean, and does
+not claim a bounded budget preserves the risk SLA. The non-interference theorem (budget ⊥ risk,
+Hoare-style) that would justify composition is **unproven / future work**. The bundler is pure stdlib
+and never imports eleata-verify (costwright's zero-dependency core is intact). See
+[docs/FUSION.md](docs/FUSION.md), [docs/NON-INTERFERENCE.md](docs/NON-INTERFERENCE.md), and the
+runnable `examples/fusion_demo.py`.
+
+### GitHub Action
+
+```yaml
+- uses: hernaninverso/costwright/action@v0.1
+  with:
+    fail-on: reject        # reject | default-dependent | non-certifiable | none
+```
+
+## JSON schema
+
+`costwright.v1` is frozen: closed enums (`category`, `provenance`, `aggregation`), stable `unit_id`,
+line spans only (no source code in output — CI-log safe). New fields are additive in `v2`.
+The `signature` field is reserved (`null` in OSS output): signed, independently verifiable
+certificates are a separate service — contact below.
+
+## What costwright does NOT do (honest scope)
+
+- It does not bound `Send` fan-out, interrupts/human-in-the-loop, CrewAI hierarchical mode,
+  dynamic `goto`, or subgraphs-passed-by-variable — those map to `non_certifiable`, never to a
+  fake bound. Conservative by construction: when in doubt, no certificate.
+- The bound is worst-case (deliberately over-approximate). Tightening it is roadmap.
+- A token-level dollar bound additionally needs caps on every call (`costwright caps`) and a
+  per-provider billing ceiling — see §3.2 of the paper for where that holds and degrades.
+
+## Theory
+
+The calculus (7 constructs, affine potential in the style of Hofmann–Jost AARA), its cost-soundness
+theorem, the relational↔functional equivalence, the termination measure, and the affine
+no-double-spend layer are machine-checked in Lean 4 (no `sorry`; axioms `[propext, Quot.sound]`):
+[hernaninverso/typed-resources](https://github.com/hernaninverso/typed-resources).
+
+## Certification / enterprise
+
+Signed budget certificates (Ed25519, independently verifiable), a live per-provider billing-ceiling
+feed (providers change semantics monthly — your certificate can silently invalidate), and org-level
+CI policy are a paid layer on top of this OSS tool. Contact: hernaninverso@gmail.com.
+
+## License
+
+Apache-2.0.

costwright-0.1.0/pyproject.toml

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+[build-system]
+requires = ["setuptools>=68"]
+build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"
+
+[project]
+name = "costwright"
+version = "0.1.0"
+description = "Static budget certificates for LLM-agent workflows (LangGraph / CrewAI / OpenAI Agents SDK). Backed by a machine-checked (Lean 4) cost-soundness theorem."
+readme = "README.md"
+requires-python = ">=3.10"
+license = { text = "Apache-2.0" }
+authors = [{ name = "Hernán Inverso" }]
+keywords = ["llm", "agents", "budget", "static-analysis", "langgraph", "crewai", "cost"]
+classifiers = [
+  "Development Status :: 4 - Beta",
+  "Intended Audience :: Developers",
+  "License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License",
+  "Programming Language :: Python :: 3",
+  "Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance",
+]
+# CERO dependencias runtime — stdlib only (spec 002 FR-003)
+dependencies = []
+
+[project.urls]
+Homepage = "https://github.com/hernaninverso/costwright"
+Paper = "https://github.com/hernaninverso/typed-resources"
+
+[project.scripts]
+costwright = "costwright.cli:main"
+
+[tool.setuptools.packages.find]
+where = ["src"]

costwright-0.1.0/setup.cfg

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+[egg_info]
+tag_build = 
+tag_date = 0
+

costwright-0.1.0/src/costwright/__init__.py

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+__version__ = "0.1.0"