contextops 0.1.0__tar.gz → 0.2.1__tar.gz

{contextops-0.1.0 → contextops-0.2.1}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: contextops
-Version: 0.1.0
+Version: 0.2.1
 Summary: Deterministic context linter for LLM applications — analyze, score, and optimize your LLM context payloads.
 Author: Abhijeet Baug
 License-Expression: MIT
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Dynamic: license-file
 
 **The deterministic context linter for LLM applications.**
 
-[![PyPI version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/contextops.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/contextops/)
+[![PyPI version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/contextops.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/contextops/) 
 [![Python](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/contextops.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/contextops/)
 [![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-yellow.svg)](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
 [![CI](https://img.shields.io/badge/CI-stable-brightgreen.svg)](STABILITY.md)

{contextops-0.1.0 → contextops-0.2.1}/README.md

@@ -1,238 +1,238 @@
-# ContextOps
-
-**The deterministic context linter for LLM applications.**
-
-[![PyPI version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/contextops.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/contextops/)
-[![Python](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/contextops.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/contextops/)
-[![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-yellow.svg)](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
-[![CI](https://img.shields.io/badge/CI-stable-brightgreen.svg)](STABILITY.md)
-
-ContextOps analyzes the context fed into your LLM and tells you what's broken — redundant chunks, wasted tokens, structural imbalance — with a **deterministic 0–100 score** and actionable fixes.
-
-Think of it as **ESLint for your LLM prompts**.
-
----
-
-## Why ContextOps?
-
-Most LLM applications blindly stuff context into the prompt window. This leads to:
-
-- 💸 **Wasted spend** — paying for redundant tokens that don't improve output
-- 🔁 **Silent regressions** — a "small RAG change" floods the context with duplicates
-- 🏗️ **Structural drift** — retrieval chunks slowly dominate the entire prompt
-- 🎯 **No visibility** — teams have no way to measure context quality in CI
-
-ContextOps gives you that visibility. It runs in your CI pipeline, scores every context payload, and fails the build if quality degrades.
-
----
-
-## Quick Start
-
-```bash
-pip install contextops
-```
-
-### See it in action
-
-```bash
-# Run the built-in demo — instant "wow moment"
-contextops demo
-```
-
-### Analyze your own context
-
-```bash
-# Full analysis with rich terminal output
-contextops inspect context.json
-
-# CI mode: fail if score drops below threshold
-contextops check context.json --min-score 70
-
-# Compare two snapshots for regressions
-contextops diff before.json after.json
-
-# JSON output for dashboards and automation
-contextops inspect context.json --json-output
-```
-
-### Python API
-
-```python
-from contextops.api.inspect import inspect_context
-
-result = inspect_context({
-    "system": "You are a helpful assistant.",
-    "chunks": [
-        {"content": "Refund policy: 30 days...", "source": "docs/refund.md"},
-        {"content": "Refund policy: within 30 days...", "source": "docs/refund.md"},
-    ],
-    "memory": ["User asked about refunds before."],
-})
-
-print(f"Score: {result.score}/100")
-print(f"Wasted tokens: {result.token_breakdown.wasted_tokens}")
-for rec in result.recommendations:
-    print(f"  → {rec.fix}")
-```
-
----
-
-## What It Measures
-
-ContextOps computes a **0–100 Context Score** from four independent penalty dimensions:
-
-| Dimension | What It Detects | Max Penalty |
-|---|---|---|
-| **Redundancy** | Duplicate / near-duplicate chunks (N-gram + Jaccard) | 30 pts |
-| **Density** | Wasted tokens from structural bloat | 30 pts |
-| **Structure** | Imbalanced type distribution (e.g., retrieval > 70%) | 20 pts |
-| **Concentration** | Source dominance or highly imbalanced chunk distribution | 20 pts |
-
-```
-Context Score = 100 - (Redundancy + Density + Structure + Concentration)
-```
-
-Every penalty maps to a **specific finding** with **token savings** and an **actionable fix**.
-
----
-
-## CI / CD Integration
-
-### GitHub Actions
-
-```yaml
-name: Context Quality Gate
-
-on: [pull_request]
-
-jobs:
-  context-check:
-    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
-    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
-      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
-        with:
-          python-version: "3.12"
-
-      - run: pip install contextops
-
-      - name: Check context quality
-        run: contextops check prompts/context.json --min-score 75
-```
-
-### Exit Codes
-
-| Code | Meaning |
-|---|---|
-| `0` | Score meets threshold — build passes |
-| `1` | Score below threshold — build fails |
-
-### Regression Detection
-
-```bash
-# Save a baseline
-contextops inspect prompts/v1.json --json-output > baseline.json
-
-# After changes, compare
-contextops diff baseline.json prompts/v2.json
-```
-
----
-
-## Context File Format
-
-ContextOps accepts a JSON file with any combination of these keys:
-
-```json
-{
-    "system": "Your system prompt here",
-    "messages": [
-        {"role": "user", "content": "User question"}
-    ],
-    "chunks": [
-        {"content": "Retrieved chunk text", "source": "docs/page.md"}
-    ],
-    "memory": [
-        "Previous conversation context"
-    ],
-    "tools": [
-        {"name": "search_api", "output": "Tool response text"}
-    ]
-}
-```
-
-It also accepts raw OpenAI message lists:
-
-```json
-[
-    {"role": "system", "content": "You are helpful."},
-    {"role": "user", "content": "What is the refund policy?"}
-]
-```
-
----
-
-## CLI Reference
-
-| Command | Purpose |
-|---|---|
-| `contextops inspect <file>` | Analyze and display results |
-| `contextops check <file> --min-score N` | CI gate with exit codes |
-| `contextops demo` | Built-in demo context |
-| `contextops stability <file>` | Deterministic stability report |
-| `contextops diff <file_a> <file_b>` | Compare two snapshots |
-
-### Flags
-
-| Flag | Commands | Purpose |
-|---|---|---|
-| `--json-output` | inspect, check | Machine-readable JSON output |
-| `--min-score N` | check | Minimum passing score (0–100) |
-| `--model <name>` | inspect, check | Target model for cost estimation |
-| `--explain` | inspect, check | Show detailed penalty reasoning |
-| `--config <file>` | inspect, check | Custom threshold config file |
-
----
-
-## Design Principles
-
-1. **Deterministic** — Same input → same output. Always. No randomness, no embeddings, no LLM calls.
-2. **Explainable** — Every penalty maps to a real issue with a token count and a fix.
-3. **CI-native** — Designed for pipelines first. Exit codes, JSON output, threshold gating.
-4. **Zero network** — Runs entirely offline. No API keys, no external services.
-
----
-
-## Stability Contract
-
-ContextOps ships with a formal [Stability Contract](STABILITY.md) that guarantees:
-
-- **Scoring determinism** — same input always produces the same score
-- **Schema stability** — JSON output fields never change within a major version
-- **Performance bounds** — sub-second for payloads up to 50,000 tokens
-- **Semantic versioning** — scoring formula changes require a major version bump
-
-This contract exists so teams can trust ContextOps in production CI pipelines.
-
----
-
-## Development
-
-```bash
-# Clone and install in dev mode
-git clone https://github.com/Abhijeet777/contextops.git
-cd contextops
-pip install -e ".[dev]"
-
-# Run tests
-pytest
-
-# Run chaos stress tests
-pytest tests/test_chaos.py -v
-```
-
----
-
-## License
-
-[MIT](LICENSE)
+# ContextOps
+
+**The deterministic context linter for LLM applications.**
+
+[![PyPI version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/contextops.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/contextops/) 
+[![Python](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/contextops.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/contextops/)
+[![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-yellow.svg)](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
+[![CI](https://img.shields.io/badge/CI-stable-brightgreen.svg)](STABILITY.md)
+
+ContextOps analyzes the context fed into your LLM and tells you what's broken — redundant chunks, wasted tokens, structural imbalance — with a **deterministic 0–100 score** and actionable fixes.
+
+Think of it as **ESLint for your LLM prompts**.
+
+---
+
+## Why ContextOps?
+
+Most LLM applications blindly stuff context into the prompt window. This leads to:
+
+- 💸 **Wasted spend** — paying for redundant tokens that don't improve output
+- 🔁 **Silent regressions** — a "small RAG change" floods the context with duplicates
+- 🏗️ **Structural drift** — retrieval chunks slowly dominate the entire prompt
+- 🎯 **No visibility** — teams have no way to measure context quality in CI
+
+ContextOps gives you that visibility. It runs in your CI pipeline, scores every context payload, and fails the build if quality degrades.
+
+---
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+pip install contextops
+```
+
+### See it in action
+
+```bash
+# Run the built-in demo — instant "wow moment"
+contextops demo
+```
+
+### Analyze your own context
+
+```bash
+# Full analysis with rich terminal output
+contextops inspect context.json
+
+# CI mode: fail if score drops below threshold
+contextops check context.json --min-score 70
+
+# Compare two snapshots for regressions
+contextops diff before.json after.json
+
+# JSON output for dashboards and automation
+contextops inspect context.json --json-output
+```
+
+### Python API
+
+```python
+from contextops.api.inspect import inspect_context
+
+result = inspect_context({
+    "system": "You are a helpful assistant.",
+    "chunks": [
+        {"content": "Refund policy: 30 days...", "source": "docs/refund.md"},
+        {"content": "Refund policy: within 30 days...", "source": "docs/refund.md"},
+    ],
+    "memory": ["User asked about refunds before."],
+})
+
+print(f"Score: {result.score}/100")
+print(f"Wasted tokens: {result.token_breakdown.wasted_tokens}")
+for rec in result.recommendations:
+    print(f"  → {rec.fix}")
+```
+
+---
+
+## What It Measures
+
+ContextOps computes a **0–100 Context Score** from four independent penalty dimensions:
+
+| Dimension | What It Detects | Max Penalty |
+|---|---|---|
+| **Redundancy** | Duplicate / near-duplicate chunks (N-gram + Jaccard) | 30 pts |
+| **Density** | Wasted tokens from structural bloat | 30 pts |
+| **Structure** | Imbalanced type distribution (e.g., retrieval > 70%) | 20 pts |
+| **Concentration** | Source dominance or highly imbalanced chunk distribution | 20 pts |
+
+```
+Context Score = 100 - (Redundancy + Density + Structure + Concentration)
+```
+
+Every penalty maps to a **specific finding** with **token savings** and an **actionable fix**.
+
+---
+
+## CI / CD Integration
+
+### GitHub Actions
+
+```yaml
+name: Context Quality Gate
+
+on: [pull_request]
+
+jobs:
+  context-check:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
+        with:
+          python-version: "3.12"
+
+      - run: pip install contextops
+
+      - name: Check context quality
+        run: contextops check prompts/context.json --min-score 75
+```
+
+### Exit Codes
+
+| Code | Meaning |
+|---|---|
+| `0` | Score meets threshold — build passes |
+| `1` | Score below threshold — build fails |
+
+### Regression Detection
+
+```bash
+# Save a baseline
+contextops inspect prompts/v1.json --json-output > baseline.json
+
+# After changes, compare
+contextops diff baseline.json prompts/v2.json
+```
+
+---
+
+## Context File Format
+
+ContextOps accepts a JSON file with any combination of these keys:
+
+```json
+{
+    "system": "Your system prompt here",
+    "messages": [
+        {"role": "user", "content": "User question"}
+    ],
+    "chunks": [
+        {"content": "Retrieved chunk text", "source": "docs/page.md"}
+    ],
+    "memory": [
+        "Previous conversation context"
+    ],
+    "tools": [
+        {"name": "search_api", "output": "Tool response text"}
+    ]
+}
+```
+
+It also accepts raw OpenAI message lists:
+
+```json
+[
+    {"role": "system", "content": "You are helpful."},
+    {"role": "user", "content": "What is the refund policy?"}
+]
+```
+
+---
+
+## CLI Reference
+
+| Command | Purpose |
+|---|---|
+| `contextops inspect <file>` | Analyze and display results |
+| `contextops check <file> --min-score N` | CI gate with exit codes |
+| `contextops demo` | Built-in demo context |
+| `contextops stability <file>` | Deterministic stability report |
+| `contextops diff <file_a> <file_b>` | Compare two snapshots |
+
+### Flags
+
+| Flag | Commands | Purpose |
+|---|---|---|
+| `--json-output` | inspect, check | Machine-readable JSON output |
+| `--min-score N` | check | Minimum passing score (0–100) |
+| `--model <name>` | inspect, check | Target model for cost estimation |
+| `--explain` | inspect, check | Show detailed penalty reasoning |
+| `--config <file>` | inspect, check | Custom threshold config file |
+
+---
+
+## Design Principles
+
+1. **Deterministic** — Same input → same output. Always. No randomness, no embeddings, no LLM calls.
+2. **Explainable** — Every penalty maps to a real issue with a token count and a fix.
+3. **CI-native** — Designed for pipelines first. Exit codes, JSON output, threshold gating.
+4. **Zero network** — Runs entirely offline. No API keys, no external services.
+
+---
+
+## Stability Contract
+
+ContextOps ships with a formal [Stability Contract](STABILITY.md) that guarantees:
+
+- **Scoring determinism** — same input always produces the same score
+- **Schema stability** — JSON output fields never change within a major version
+- **Performance bounds** — sub-second for payloads up to 50,000 tokens
+- **Semantic versioning** — scoring formula changes require a major version bump
+
+This contract exists so teams can trust ContextOps in production CI pipelines.
+
+---
+
+## Development
+
+```bash
+# Clone and install in dev mode
+git clone https://github.com/Abhijeet777/contextops.git
+cd contextops
+pip install -e ".[dev]"
+
+# Run tests
+pytest
+
+# Run chaos stress tests
+pytest tests/test_chaos.py -v
+```
+
+---
+
+## License
+
+[MIT](LICENSE)