codejury 0.14.4__tar.gz → 0.14.6__tar.gz

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (80) hide show
  1. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/PKG-INFO +1 -1
  2. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/agent/full-review.md +46 -12
  3. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/repo/model.py +98 -27
  4. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury.egg-info/PKG-INFO +1 -1
  5. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/pyproject.toml +1 -1
  6. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_repo_model.py +48 -0
  7. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/LICENSE +0 -0
  8. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/README.md +0 -0
  9. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/__init__.py +0 -0
  10. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/cli.py +0 -0
  11. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/agent/security-review-memory.md +0 -0
  12. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/entrypoints.yaml +0 -0
  13. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/SKILL.md +0 -0
  14. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/business-logic.md +0 -0
  15. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/code-injection.md +0 -0
  16. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/command-injection.md +0 -0
  17. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/cross-site-request-forgery.md +0 -0
  18. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/cross-site-scripting.md +0 -0
  19. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/hardcoded-secrets.md +0 -0
  20. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/http-response-splitting.md +0 -0
  21. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/improper-authentication.md +0 -0
  22. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/information-exposure.md +0 -0
  23. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/insecure-cryptography.md +0 -0
  24. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/insecure-deserialization.md +0 -0
  25. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/insecure-direct-object-reference.md +0 -0
  26. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/insecure-transport.md +0 -0
  27. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/jwt-validation.md +0 -0
  28. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/mass-assignment.md +0 -0
  29. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/missing-authorization.md +0 -0
  30. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/open-redirect.md +0 -0
  31. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/path-traversal.md +0 -0
  32. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/race-condition.md +0 -0
  33. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/replay-attack.md +0 -0
  34. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/server-side-request-forgery.md +0 -0
  35. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/server-side-template-injection.md +0 -0
  36. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/session-fixation.md +0 -0
  37. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/sql-injection.md +0 -0
  38. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/data/rules/xml-external-entity.md +0 -0
  39. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/diff/__init__.py +0 -0
  40. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/diff/debate.py +0 -0
  41. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/diff/debate_prompts.py +0 -0
  42. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/diff/engine.py +0 -0
  43. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/diff/findings_filter.py +0 -0
  44. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/diff/prompts.py +0 -0
  45. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/diff/rules.py +0 -0
  46. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/diff/runner.py +0 -0
  47. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/domain/__init__.py +0 -0
  48. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/domain/finding.py +0 -0
  49. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/json_parse.py +0 -0
  50. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/providers/__init__.py +0 -0
  51. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/providers/anthropic.py +0 -0
  52. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/providers/base.py +0 -0
  53. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/providers/factory.py +0 -0
  54. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/providers/litellm.py +0 -0
  55. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/providers/mock.py +0 -0
  56. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/providers/openai.py +0 -0
  57. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/providers/openai_format.py +0 -0
  58. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/providers/retry.py +0 -0
  59. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/repo/__init__.py +0 -0
  60. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/repo/scaffold.py +0 -0
  61. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/report.py +0 -0
  62. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury/resources.py +0 -0
  63. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury.egg-info/SOURCES.txt +0 -0
  64. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury.egg-info/dependency_links.txt +0 -0
  65. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury.egg-info/entry_points.txt +0 -0
  66. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury.egg-info/requires.txt +0 -0
  67. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/codejury.egg-info/top_level.txt +0 -0
  68. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/setup.cfg +0 -0
  69. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_anthropic_provider.py +0 -0
  70. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_cli_audit.py +0 -0
  71. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_diff_debate.py +0 -0
  72. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_diff_engine.py +0 -0
  73. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_json_parse.py +0 -0
  74. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_litellm_provider.py +0 -0
  75. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_openai_format.py +0 -0
  76. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_openai_provider.py +0 -0
  77. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_repo_scaffold.py +0 -0
  78. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_report.py +0 -0
  79. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_retry_provider.py +0 -0
  80. {codejury-0.14.4 → codejury-0.14.6}/tests/test_rules.py +0 -0
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  Metadata-Version: 2.4
2
2
  Name: codejury
3
- Version: 0.14.4
3
+ Version: 0.14.6
4
4
  Summary: AI code security review: an adversarial diff-audit engine and an agent-driven whole-repo review methodology, with security knowledge as rich rules
5
5
  Author: AISecLabs
6
6
  License-Expression: MIT
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
1
1
  # Full Security Review — Agent Methodology
2
2
 
3
3
  A whole-repository security audit, run by an interactive coding agent (Claude
4
- Code, Codex, etc.), not a one-shot LLM call. It traverses the codebase from its
5
- API entrypoints, reasons across files, verifies issues with a real PoC, and
4
+ Code, Codex, etc.), not a one-shot LLM call. It maps the attack surface, traces
5
+ inputs to sinks across files, verifies issues with a real PoC, and
6
6
  iterates over multiple rounds with a persistent memory. One round is roughly
7
7
  30 minutes; run as many rounds as needed.
8
8
 
@@ -18,15 +18,34 @@ Workspace: `<workspace>/<project>/` (created for you), holding `api/`,
18
18
  - skip every pattern under "Confirmed false positives";
19
19
  - do not re-report anything under "Fixed";
20
20
  - weight the files under "High-risk areas" more heavily.
21
- 2. Read `api/_entrypoints.md` (seeded for you from a deterministic scan) as the
22
- starting map of HTTP routes and CLI commands.
21
+ 2. Read `api/_entrypoints.md` (seeded for you from a deterministic AST scan) as a
22
+ *starting* map of the attack surface. It lists HTTP routes and CLI commands
23
+ only, so it is a subset, not the whole surface (see "Map the attack surface").
23
24
  3. Read the relevant rule files under the shipped `rules/` for the target's stack
24
25
  (sql-injection, idor, ssrf, authentication-jwt, insecure-deserialization, ...).
25
26
 
26
- ## Analysis
27
+ ## Map the attack surface
28
+
29
+ The seeded inventory lists HTTP routes and CLI commands only. Before analysing,
30
+ complete the surface: untrusted input enters at more than HTTP. Enumerate every
31
+ source the attacker can influence and add it to `api/`:
32
+
33
+ - HTTP routes, GraphQL resolvers, gRPC / RPC handlers, WebSocket handlers;
34
+ - CLI commands, scheduled jobs / cron, queue and topic consumers, webhooks and
35
+ third-party callbacks;
36
+ - deserialization points (pickle, yaml.load, marshal), file and document parsers
37
+ (XML / XXE, YAML, CSV, zip, image / office), template rendering of user input;
38
+ - file uploads, archive extraction, and any filesystem path built from user input;
39
+ - headers, cookies, environment, and config read as trusted, and inbound
40
+ inter-service calls.
41
+
42
+ `pickle.loads(cookie)` and `yaml.load(upload)` are entrypoints just as much as a
43
+ route is. Record the inventory in `api/` (one file per module: source + auth
44
+ method + review status ✅/⚠️/❌).
27
45
 
28
- Start from the API entrypoints and read the implementation of each one. For every
29
- endpoint ask:
46
+ ## Analyse each source
47
+
48
+ Read the implementation reachable from each source. For every one ask:
30
49
 
31
50
  - What inputs can the attacker control?
32
51
  - Is authentication, authorization, signature verification, tenant isolation, or
@@ -38,9 +57,24 @@ endpoint ask:
38
57
  - Mass assignment: is a user-controlled body bound wholesale into a model?
39
58
  - Signature: is a caller-supplied key trusted as the trust anchor?
40
59
 
41
- Record the API inventory in `api/` (one file per module: route + auth method +
42
- review status ✅/⚠️/❌). Record architecture understanding and high-risk paths in
43
- `analysis/`.
60
+ ## Trace attack paths (the core work)
61
+
62
+ A whole-repo review earns its keep by reasoning *across files*: a flaw is usually
63
+ a source in one file reaching a dangerous sink in another, past a control defined
64
+ in a third (a route that trusts a helper which skips signature checks; an id that
65
+ reaches a query with no ownership check). For each promising source, trace the
66
+ path and record it in `analysis/`:
67
+
68
+ - **Source**: the entrypoint and the attacker-controlled value.
69
+ - **Sink**: the dangerous operation it reaches (query, shell, file path, fetch,
70
+ deserialize, template, redirect), with `file:line`.
71
+ - **Controls on the path**: every auth / authz / validation / sanitization /
72
+ signature / tenant check between source and sink, and crucially which are
73
+ missing or bypassable.
74
+
75
+ The vulnerability is a path with a reachable sink and no adequate control. Record
76
+ the system's trust boundaries and auth/authz model in `analysis/` once, so every
77
+ trace can refer to it instead of restating it.
44
78
 
45
79
  ## Scope
46
80
 
@@ -59,7 +93,7 @@ confirm with high confidence. Each must have:
59
93
 
60
94
  - Risk: HIGH | CRITICAL
61
95
  - Type: IDOR | auth bypass | signature flaw | business logic | ...
62
- - Endpoint: `<METHOD> <path>`
96
+ - Source: `<METHOD> <path>` or the non-HTTP entrypoint (queue, deserializer, ...)
63
97
 
64
98
  ## Analysis
65
99
  (cite exact file paths and line numbers)
@@ -92,7 +126,7 @@ destructive action without the operator's explicit go-ahead.
92
126
 
93
127
  Each round, read the workspace history first and do not repeat finished work.
94
128
  Process leftover TODOs; otherwise pick an unreviewed (❌) or to-deepen (⚠️)
95
- endpoint from the API inventory. When every endpoint is ✅ and there are no TODOs,
129
+ source from the inventory. When every source is ✅ and there are no TODOs,
96
130
  report the review complete.
97
131
 
98
132
  ## On finish
@@ -80,31 +80,32 @@ def build_repo_model_from_dir(root: str | Path, *, signatures: _Signatures | Non
80
80
  def build_repo_model(root: str | Path, files: dict[str, str], *, signatures: _Signatures | None = None) -> RepoModel:
81
81
  """Build a RepoModel from {path: content}. Files that do not parse are skipped."""
82
82
  sigs = signatures or load_entrypoint_signatures()
83
- entrypoints: list[Entrypoint] = []
83
+ asts: dict[str, ast.Module] = {}
84
84
  for path, content in sorted(files.items()):
85
85
  try:
86
- tree = ast.parse(content)
86
+ asts[path] = ast.parse(content)
87
87
  except SyntaxError:
88
- continue
89
- # an entrypoint must name a reviewable handler function; drop entries
90
- # with no resolvable function (a Django include() mount, or a view the
91
- # AST scan cannot resolve) so the seeded inventory stays clean
92
- entrypoints.extend(e for e in _entrypoints_in(path, tree, sigs) if e.function)
88
+ continue # unparseable file is skipped, not fatal
89
+ entrypoints: list[Entrypoint] = []
90
+ for path, tree in asts.items():
91
+ entrypoints.extend(_decorator_entrypoints_in(path, tree, sigs.decorators))
92
+ # route-call entrypoints (Django path()): resolved across files so an
93
+ # include() mount contributes its sub-routes under the mount's prefix
94
+ entrypoints.extend(_route_call_entrypoints(asts, sigs.calls))
95
+ # an entrypoint must name a reviewable handler function; drop entries with no
96
+ # resolvable function (an unresolved view) so the seeded inventory stays clean
97
+ entrypoints = [e for e in entrypoints if e.function]
93
98
  return RepoModel(root=str(root), files=tuple(sorted(files)), entrypoints=tuple(entrypoints))
94
99
 
95
100
 
96
- def _entrypoints_in(path: str, tree: ast.Module, sigs: _Signatures) -> list[Entrypoint]:
101
+ def _decorator_entrypoints_in(path: str, tree: ast.Module, deco_sigs) -> list[Entrypoint]:
97
102
  out: list[Entrypoint] = []
98
103
  for node in ast.walk(tree):
99
104
  if isinstance(node, (ast.FunctionDef, ast.AsyncFunctionDef)):
100
105
  for dec in node.decorator_list:
101
- ep = _decorator_entrypoint(path, node, dec, sigs.decorators)
106
+ ep = _decorator_entrypoint(path, node, dec, deco_sigs)
102
107
  if ep is not None:
103
108
  out.append(ep)
104
- elif isinstance(node, ast.Call):
105
- ep = _call_entrypoint(path, node, sigs.calls)
106
- if ep is not None:
107
- out.append(ep)
108
109
  return out
109
110
 
110
111
 
@@ -136,21 +137,91 @@ def _decorator_entrypoint(path, func, dec, deco_sigs) -> Entrypoint | None:
136
137
  )
137
138
 
138
139
 
139
- def _call_entrypoint(path, call, call_sigs) -> Entrypoint | None:
140
- name = call.func.attr if isinstance(call.func, ast.Attribute) else (
141
- call.func.id if isinstance(call.func, ast.Name) else None
142
- )
143
- sig = next((s for s in call_sigs if name in s["names"]), None)
144
- if sig is None:
140
+ # names of the call that mounts a sub-urlconf (Django include()); a route call
141
+ # whose view position is one of these recurses into the included module
142
+ _INCLUDE_NAMES = frozenset({"include"})
143
+
144
+
145
+ def _call_name(call: ast.Call) -> str | None:
146
+ f = call.func
147
+ if isinstance(f, ast.Attribute):
148
+ return f.attr
149
+ if isinstance(f, ast.Name):
150
+ return f.id
151
+ return None
152
+
153
+
154
+ def _route_calls(tree: ast.Module, names: set[str]) -> list[ast.Call]:
155
+ return [n for n in ast.walk(tree) if isinstance(n, ast.Call) and _call_name(n) in names]
156
+
157
+
158
+ def _include_module(call: ast.Call) -> str | None:
159
+ """If this route call mounts a sub-urlconf via include('a.b.urls'), return the
160
+ dotted module; else None. Handles include('mod') and include(('mod', 'ns'))."""
161
+ if len(call.args) < 2 or not isinstance(call.args[1], ast.Call):
145
162
  return None
146
- return Entrypoint(
147
- file=path,
148
- line=call.lineno,
149
- function=_view_name(call),
150
- kind=sig["kind"],
151
- framework=sig["framework"],
152
- route=_first_str_arg(call),
153
- )
163
+ inc = call.args[1]
164
+ if _call_name(inc) not in _INCLUDE_NAMES or not inc.args:
165
+ return None
166
+ a = inc.args[0]
167
+ if isinstance(a, ast.Constant) and isinstance(a.value, str):
168
+ return a.value
169
+ if isinstance(a, ast.Tuple) and a.elts and isinstance(a.elts[0], ast.Constant) and isinstance(a.elts[0].value, str):
170
+ return a.elts[0].value
171
+ return None
172
+
173
+
174
+ def _module_to_file(module: str, files: set[str]) -> str | None:
175
+ """Resolve a dotted module ('app.urls') to a file in the repo, by exact path or
176
+ a suffix match (the dotted path may be rooted above the scanned tree)."""
177
+ candidate = module.replace(".", "/") + ".py"
178
+ if candidate in files:
179
+ return candidate
180
+ matches = sorted(f for f in files if f.endswith("/" + candidate))
181
+ return matches[0] if matches else None
182
+
183
+
184
+ def _route_call_entrypoints(asts: dict[str, ast.Module], call_sigs) -> list[Entrypoint]:
185
+ if not call_sigs:
186
+ return []
187
+ names = {n for s in call_sigs for n in s["names"]}
188
+ sig_by_name = {n: s for s in call_sigs for n in s["names"]}
189
+ files = set(asts)
190
+
191
+ # files mounted by another file's include() are not roots; they are emitted
192
+ # only through the include chain, with the mount prefix, never standalone
193
+ mounted: set[str] = set()
194
+ for tree in asts.values():
195
+ for call in _route_calls(tree, names):
196
+ mod = _include_module(call)
197
+ target = _module_to_file(mod, files) if mod else None
198
+ if target:
199
+ mounted.add(target)
200
+
201
+ out: list[Entrypoint] = []
202
+ for path in sorted(asts):
203
+ if path not in mounted:
204
+ _emit_routes(path, "", asts, files, names, sig_by_name, {path}, out)
205
+ return out
206
+
207
+
208
+ def _emit_routes(path, prefix, asts, files, names, sig_by_name, visited, out) -> None:
209
+ for call in _route_calls(asts[path], names):
210
+ seg = _first_str_arg(call)
211
+ mod = _include_module(call)
212
+ if mod:
213
+ target = _module_to_file(mod, files)
214
+ if target and target not in visited:
215
+ _emit_routes(target, prefix + seg, asts, files, names, sig_by_name, visited | {target}, out)
216
+ continue
217
+ view = _view_name(call)
218
+ if not view:
219
+ continue
220
+ sig = sig_by_name[_call_name(call)]
221
+ out.append(Entrypoint(
222
+ file=path, line=call.lineno, function=view,
223
+ kind=sig["kind"], framework=sig["framework"], route=prefix + seg,
224
+ ))
154
225
 
155
226
 
156
227
  def _first_str_arg(call: ast.Call) -> str:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  Metadata-Version: 2.4
2
2
  Name: codejury
3
- Version: 0.14.4
3
+ Version: 0.14.6
4
4
  Summary: AI code security review: an adversarial diff-audit engine and an agent-driven whole-repo review methodology, with security knowledge as rich rules
5
5
  Author: AISecLabs
6
6
  License-Expression: MIT
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  [project]
2
2
  name = "codejury"
3
- version = "0.14.4"
3
+ version = "0.14.6"
4
4
  description = "AI code security review: an adversarial diff-audit engine and an agent-driven whole-repo review methodology, with security knowledge as rich rules"
5
5
  readme = "README.md"
6
6
  requires-python = ">=3.12"
@@ -115,6 +115,54 @@ def test_django_path_calls_capture_view_and_route():
115
115
  }
116
116
 
117
117
 
118
+ DJANGO_ROOT = '''
119
+ from django.urls import path, include
120
+ urlpatterns = [
121
+ path("", include("introduction.urls")),
122
+ path("api/", include("api.urls")),
123
+ path("health/", views.health),
124
+ ]
125
+ '''
126
+ DJANGO_INTRO = '''
127
+ from django.urls import path
128
+ from . import views
129
+ urlpatterns = [
130
+ path("home/", views.home),
131
+ path("xss", views.xss),
132
+ ]
133
+ '''
134
+ DJANGO_API = '''
135
+ from django.urls import path, include
136
+ urlpatterns = [
137
+ path("v1/", include("api.v1.urls")),
138
+ ]
139
+ '''
140
+ DJANGO_API_V1 = '''
141
+ from django.urls import path
142
+ urlpatterns = [
143
+ path("users", views.users),
144
+ ]
145
+ '''
146
+
147
+
148
+ def test_django_include_mounts_subroutes_under_prefix():
149
+ model = _model({
150
+ "urls.py": DJANGO_ROOT,
151
+ "introduction/urls.py": DJANGO_INTRO,
152
+ "api/urls.py": DJANGO_API,
153
+ "api/v1/urls.py": DJANGO_API_V1,
154
+ })
155
+ routes = {(e.function, e.route) for e in model.entrypoints}
156
+ assert routes == {
157
+ ("health", "health/"), # direct route on the root urlconf
158
+ ("home", "home/"), # included at "" prefix
159
+ ("xss", "xss"),
160
+ ("users", "api/v1/users"), # nested include: "api/" + "v1/" + "users"
161
+ }
162
+ # the included sub-urlconfs are not also emitted standalone (no bare "users")
163
+ assert all(e.route != "users" for e in model.entrypoints)
164
+
165
+
118
166
  def test_django_include_and_cbv_with_no_resolvable_function_are_dropped():
119
167
  # include() mounts and an unresolved .as_view() carry no handler function;
120
168
  # only the plain function-based view survives, no empty `- -` noise entries
File without changes
File without changes
File without changes
File without changes
File without changes
File without changes