codejury 0.14.0__tar.gz → 0.14.1__tar.gz

{codejury-0.14.0 → codejury-0.14.1}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: codejury
-Version: 0.14.0
+Version: 0.14.1
 Summary: AI code security review: an adversarial diff-audit engine and an agent-driven whole-repo review methodology, with security knowledge as rich rules
 Author: AISecLabs
 License-Expression: MIT

{codejury-0.14.0 → codejury-0.14.1}/codejury/cli.py

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ from codejury.domain.finding import Finding
 # A diff larger than this is audited file-by-file so a big PR does not overflow
 # the model's context and silently truncate the reply.
 _MAX_DIFF_CHARS = 60_000
-from codejury.fullreview.scaffold import scaffold
+from codejury.repo.scaffold import scaffold
 from codejury.providers.factory import (
     DEFAULT_API_BASE,
     DEFAULT_API_KEY,

{codejury-0.14.0/codejury/fullreview → codejury-0.14.1/codejury/repo}/scaffold.py

@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
-"""Full-review scaffold: set up the agent's workspace, do not run a pipeline.
+"""Whole-repo review scaffold: set up the agent's workspace, do not run a pipeline.
 
-Whole-repo review is too large for a single LLM call, so codejury does not run it
-as a pipeline. Instead it scaffolds a workspace for an interactive agent (Claude
-Code, Codex) and hands over the methodology: it creates the api/issues/analysis
-directories, copies the review-memory template, seeds the API inventory from a
-deterministic RepoModel scan, and returns the methodology text to print.
+The `review repo` path. Whole-repo review is too large for a single LLM call, so
+codejury does not run it as a pipeline. Instead it scaffolds a workspace for an
+interactive agent (Claude Code, Codex) and hands over the methodology: it creates
+the api/issues/analysis directories, copies the review-memory template, seeds the
+API inventory from a deterministic RepoModel scan, and returns the methodology
+text to print.
 """
 
 from __future__ import annotations
@@ -12,7 +13,7 @@ from __future__ import annotations
 from dataclasses import dataclass, field
 from pathlib import Path
 
-from codejury.analysis.repo_model import build_repo_model_from_dir
+from codejury.repo.model import build_repo_model_from_dir
 from codejury.resources import AGENT_DIR
 
 _METHODOLOGY = AGENT_DIR / "full-review.md"

{codejury-0.14.0 → codejury-0.14.1}/codejury.egg-info/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: codejury
-Version: 0.14.0
+Version: 0.14.1
 Summary: AI code security review: an adversarial diff-audit engine and an agent-driven whole-repo review methodology, with security knowledge as rich rules
 Author: AISecLabs
 License-Expression: MIT

{codejury-0.14.0 → codejury-0.14.1}/codejury.egg-info/SOURCES.txt

@@ -10,8 +10,6 @@ codejury.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
 codejury.egg-info/entry_points.txt
 codejury.egg-info/requires.txt
 codejury.egg-info/top_level.txt
-codejury/analysis/__init__.py
-codejury/analysis/repo_model.py
 codejury/data/entrypoints.yaml
 codejury/data/agent/full-review.md
 codejury/data/agent/security-review-memory.md
@@ -51,8 +49,6 @@ codejury/diff/report.py
 codejury/diff/rules.py
 codejury/domain/__init__.py
 codejury/domain/finding.py
-codejury/fullreview/__init__.py
-codejury/fullreview/scaffold.py
 codejury/infrastructure/__init__.py
 codejury/infrastructure/json_parse.py
 codejury/providers/__init__.py
@@ -64,16 +60,19 @@ codejury/providers/mock.py
 codejury/providers/openai.py
 codejury/providers/openai_format.py
 codejury/providers/retry.py
+codejury/repo/__init__.py
+codejury/repo/model.py
+codejury/repo/scaffold.py
 tests/test_anthropic_provider.py
 tests/test_cli_audit.py
 tests/test_diff_debate.py
 tests/test_diff_engine.py
 tests/test_diff_report.py
-tests/test_full_review_scaffold.py
 tests/test_json_parse.py
 tests/test_litellm_provider.py
 tests/test_openai_format.py
 tests/test_openai_provider.py
 tests/test_repo_model.py
+tests/test_repo_scaffold.py
 tests/test_retry_provider.py
 tests/test_rules.py

{codejury-0.14.0 → codejury-0.14.1}/pyproject.toml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 [project]
 name = "codejury"
-version = "0.14.0"
+version = "0.14.1"
 description = "AI code security review: an adversarial diff-audit engine and an agent-driven whole-repo review methodology, with security knowledge as rich rules"
 readme = "README.md"
 requires-python = ">=3.12"

{codejury-0.14.0 → codejury-0.14.1}/tests/test_repo_model.py

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 """P6-01: the RepoModel entrypoint detection is deterministic and data-driven."""
 
-from codejury.analysis.repo_model import (
+from codejury.repo.model import (
     Entrypoint,
     build_repo_model,
     build_repo_model_from_dir,

codejury-0.14.0/tests/test_full_review_scaffold.py → codejury-0.14.1/tests/test_repo_scaffold.py

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 analysis + memory + seeded entrypoints) and returns the methodology. It does not
 run an LLM pipeline."""
 
-from codejury.fullreview.scaffold import scaffold
+from codejury.repo.scaffold import scaffold
 
 APP = '''
 from flask import Flask

codejury-0.14.0/codejury/analysis/__init__.py

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-"""Static analysis for provenance (P1).
-
-The code-graph / data-flow engine that gives the verifier provenance: whether a
-value reaching a sink is attacker-controlled, sanitized, or a trusted constant.
-It targets the taint precision floor that single-file LLM review cannot reach,
-see ROADMAP P1. Python AST based, currently intra-procedural plus a one-hop
-cross-file caller resolution, not yet a full code graph.
-"""