code-review-ai-cli 1.1.0__tar.gz → 1.2.0__tar.gz

{code_review_ai_cli-1.1.0 → code_review_ai_cli-1.2.0}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: code-review-ai-cli
-Version: 1.1.0
+Version: 1.2.0
 Summary: Automated AI-powered code review CLI for Azure DevOps / TFS Pull Requests
 License: MIT
 Keywords: code-review,ai,azure-devops,tfs,pull-request,llm
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Automated code review tool with Pull Request integration for Azure DevOps/TFS an
 - **Multiple LLM Providers** — OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Gemini, Claude, Ollama, GitHub Copilot, AWS Bedrock
 - **Smart Filtering** — Filter by file extensions, limit diff size
 - **Project-aware PR Context** — Sends repository and linked work item context while restricting findings to modified PR lines
-- **Customizable Prompts** — Markdown-based review guidelines
+- **Single Reviewer Context** — One Markdown context file with local override support
 - **Usage Tracking** — Store per-PR token usage and optional cost estimates
 - **Interactive CLI** — Menu-driven selection and confirmation
 
@@ -89,7 +89,9 @@ ai-review init
 
 Creates:
 - `config.yaml` — LLM and review settings
-- `review_prompt.md` — Customizable review guidelines
+- `review_context.example.md` — Canonical example reviewer context
+- `review_context.local.md` — Local reviewer context override, ignored by git
+- `.gitignore` entry for `review_context.local.md`
 
 ### 3. Run Your First Review
 
@@ -130,6 +132,8 @@ review:
   scope: diff_with_context             # diff_with_context, diff_only, full_code
   file_extensions_filter: [".cs", ".ts", ".py"]
   max_diff_files: 50
+  max_comments_to_post: 20
+  custom_prompt_file: review_context.local.md
   project_context:
     enabled: true
     mode: on_demand                      # on_demand, full
@@ -143,14 +147,27 @@ review:
     max_items: 20
 ```
 
-By default, repository context is loaded on demand: the prompt includes the PR
-diff, full changed-file contents, linked work item documentation, and a
-repository manifest, then the model requests any extra files it needs. Set
+By default, repository context is loaded on demand: the prompt includes explicit
+source-branch change packets, full changed-file contents as read-only context,
+linked work item documentation, and a repository manifest, then the model
+requests any extra files it needs. Inline PR comments must still be grounded in
+actual changed lines from the change packets. Set
 `review.project_context.mode: full` to send the full eligible repository
 snapshot instead. Bedrock uses a default estimated prompt budget of 180000
 tokens; override it with `llm.max_prompt_tokens` if your model supports more or
 less.
 
+Reviewer context is loaded from exactly one Markdown file. By default the CLI
+uses `review_context.local.md` when it exists, otherwise it falls back to the
+packaged `src/prompts/review_context.example.md`. Keep local team tweaks in
+`review_context.local.md`; it is gitignored so the canonical context cannot
+drift across machines.
+
+For Copilot-backed reviews, Claude Sonnet models are often strong choices for
+large PR validation, for example `llm.provider: copilot` with a Claude Sonnet
+model available to your organization. The tool still enforces the same
+source-branch grounding, duplicate checks, and comment cap regardless of model.
+
 ## Development & Testing
 
 This is a standard Python project with the following structure:

{code_review_ai_cli-1.1.0 → code_review_ai_cli-1.2.0}/README.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Automated code review tool with Pull Request integration for Azure DevOps/TFS an
 - **Multiple LLM Providers** — OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Gemini, Claude, Ollama, GitHub Copilot, AWS Bedrock
 - **Smart Filtering** — Filter by file extensions, limit diff size
 - **Project-aware PR Context** — Sends repository and linked work item context while restricting findings to modified PR lines
-- **Customizable Prompts** — Markdown-based review guidelines
+- **Single Reviewer Context** — One Markdown context file with local override support
 - **Usage Tracking** — Store per-PR token usage and optional cost estimates
 - **Interactive CLI** — Menu-driven selection and confirmation
 
@@ -52,7 +52,9 @@ ai-review init
 
 Creates:
 - `config.yaml` — LLM and review settings
-- `review_prompt.md` — Customizable review guidelines
+- `review_context.example.md` — Canonical example reviewer context
+- `review_context.local.md` — Local reviewer context override, ignored by git
+- `.gitignore` entry for `review_context.local.md`
 
 ### 3. Run Your First Review
 
@@ -93,6 +95,8 @@ review:
   scope: diff_with_context             # diff_with_context, diff_only, full_code
   file_extensions_filter: [".cs", ".ts", ".py"]
   max_diff_files: 50
+  max_comments_to_post: 20
+  custom_prompt_file: review_context.local.md
   project_context:
     enabled: true
     mode: on_demand                      # on_demand, full
@@ -106,14 +110,27 @@ review:
     max_items: 20
 ```
 
-By default, repository context is loaded on demand: the prompt includes the PR
-diff, full changed-file contents, linked work item documentation, and a
-repository manifest, then the model requests any extra files it needs. Set
+By default, repository context is loaded on demand: the prompt includes explicit
+source-branch change packets, full changed-file contents as read-only context,
+linked work item documentation, and a repository manifest, then the model
+requests any extra files it needs. Inline PR comments must still be grounded in
+actual changed lines from the change packets. Set
 `review.project_context.mode: full` to send the full eligible repository
 snapshot instead. Bedrock uses a default estimated prompt budget of 180000
 tokens; override it with `llm.max_prompt_tokens` if your model supports more or
 less.
 
+Reviewer context is loaded from exactly one Markdown file. By default the CLI
+uses `review_context.local.md` when it exists, otherwise it falls back to the
+packaged `src/prompts/review_context.example.md`. Keep local team tweaks in
+`review_context.local.md`; it is gitignored so the canonical context cannot
+drift across machines.
+
+For Copilot-backed reviews, Claude Sonnet models are often strong choices for
+large PR validation, for example `llm.provider: copilot` with a Claude Sonnet
+model available to your organization. The tool still enforces the same
+source-branch grounding, duplicate checks, and comment cap regardless of model.
+
 ## Development & Testing
 
 This is a standard Python project with the following structure:

{code_review_ai_cli-1.1.0 → code_review_ai_cli-1.2.0}/code_review_ai_cli.egg-info/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: code-review-ai-cli
-Version: 1.1.0
+Version: 1.2.0
 Summary: Automated AI-powered code review CLI for Azure DevOps / TFS Pull Requests
 License: MIT
 Keywords: code-review,ai,azure-devops,tfs,pull-request,llm
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Automated code review tool with Pull Request integration for Azure DevOps/TFS an
 - **Multiple LLM Providers** — OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Gemini, Claude, Ollama, GitHub Copilot, AWS Bedrock
 - **Smart Filtering** — Filter by file extensions, limit diff size
 - **Project-aware PR Context** — Sends repository and linked work item context while restricting findings to modified PR lines
-- **Customizable Prompts** — Markdown-based review guidelines
+- **Single Reviewer Context** — One Markdown context file with local override support
 - **Usage Tracking** — Store per-PR token usage and optional cost estimates
 - **Interactive CLI** — Menu-driven selection and confirmation
 
@@ -89,7 +89,9 @@ ai-review init
 
 Creates:
 - `config.yaml` — LLM and review settings
-- `review_prompt.md` — Customizable review guidelines
+- `review_context.example.md` — Canonical example reviewer context
+- `review_context.local.md` — Local reviewer context override, ignored by git
+- `.gitignore` entry for `review_context.local.md`
 
 ### 3. Run Your First Review
 
@@ -130,6 +132,8 @@ review:
   scope: diff_with_context             # diff_with_context, diff_only, full_code
   file_extensions_filter: [".cs", ".ts", ".py"]
   max_diff_files: 50
+  max_comments_to_post: 20
+  custom_prompt_file: review_context.local.md
   project_context:
     enabled: true
     mode: on_demand                      # on_demand, full
@@ -143,14 +147,27 @@ review:
     max_items: 20
 ```
 
-By default, repository context is loaded on demand: the prompt includes the PR
-diff, full changed-file contents, linked work item documentation, and a
-repository manifest, then the model requests any extra files it needs. Set
+By default, repository context is loaded on demand: the prompt includes explicit
+source-branch change packets, full changed-file contents as read-only context,
+linked work item documentation, and a repository manifest, then the model
+requests any extra files it needs. Inline PR comments must still be grounded in
+actual changed lines from the change packets. Set
 `review.project_context.mode: full` to send the full eligible repository
 snapshot instead. Bedrock uses a default estimated prompt budget of 180000
 tokens; override it with `llm.max_prompt_tokens` if your model supports more or
 less.
 
+Reviewer context is loaded from exactly one Markdown file. By default the CLI
+uses `review_context.local.md` when it exists, otherwise it falls back to the
+packaged `src/prompts/review_context.example.md`. Keep local team tweaks in
+`review_context.local.md`; it is gitignored so the canonical context cannot
+drift across machines.
+
+For Copilot-backed reviews, Claude Sonnet models are often strong choices for
+large PR validation, for example `llm.provider: copilot` with a Claude Sonnet
+model available to your organization. The tool still enforces the same
+source-branch grounding, duplicate checks, and comment cap regardless of model.
+
 ## Development & Testing
 
 This is a standard Python project with the following structure:

{code_review_ai_cli-1.1.0 → code_review_ai_cli-1.2.0}/code_review_ai_cli.egg-info/SOURCES.txt

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ src/llm_client.py
 src/tfs_client.py
 src/usage_tracker.py
 src/prompts/config.yaml.template
-src/prompts/review_prompt.md.template
+src/prompts/review_context.example.md
 tests/test_ai_review.py
 tests/test_config.py
 tests/test_formatter.py

{code_review_ai_cli-1.1.0 → code_review_ai_cli-1.2.0}/pyproject.toml

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"
 
 [project]
 name = "code-review-ai-cli"
-version = "1.1.0"
+version = "1.2.0"
 description = "Automated AI-powered code review CLI for Azure DevOps / TFS Pull Requests"
 readme = "README.md"
 requires-python = ">=3.10"