cat-stack 1.6.0__tar.gz → 1.6.1__tar.gz

{cat_stack-1.6.0 → cat_stack-1.6.1}/PKG-INFO

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Metadata-Version: 2.4
 Name: cat-stack
-Version: 1.6.0
+Version: 1.6.1
 Summary: Domain-agnostic text, image, PDF, and DOCX classification engine powered by LLMs
 Project-URL: Documentation, https://github.com/chrissoria/cat-stack#readme
 Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/chrissoria/cat-stack/issues
@@ -177,7 +177,11 @@ All providers use the same `(model_name, provider, api_key)` tuple format. Provi
 - **Multi-model ensemble** with consensus voting and agreement scores
 - **Batch API support** for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, and xAI
 - **Prompt strategies**: Chain-of-Thought, Chain-of-Verification, step-back prompting, few-shot examples
-- **Text, image, and PDF** input auto-detection
+- **Text, image, and PDF** input auto-detection (PDF inputs are
+  validated against the `%PDF-` magic-byte header before reaching
+  PyMuPDF, so a webpage saved with `.pdf` extension surfaces a clear
+  `ValueError` instead of silently classifying a blank rendered page
+  as `success`)
 - **Embedding similarity** tiebreaker for ensemble consensus ties
 - **Pilot test** — validate classifications on a small sample before committing to the full run
 

{cat_stack-1.6.0 → cat_stack-1.6.1}/README.md

@@ -141,7 +141,11 @@ All providers use the same `(model_name, provider, api_key)` tuple format. Provi
 - **Multi-model ensemble** with consensus voting and agreement scores
 - **Batch API support** for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, and xAI
 - **Prompt strategies**: Chain-of-Thought, Chain-of-Verification, step-back prompting, few-shot examples
-- **Text, image, and PDF** input auto-detection
+- **Text, image, and PDF** input auto-detection (PDF inputs are
+  validated against the `%PDF-` magic-byte header before reaching
+  PyMuPDF, so a webpage saved with `.pdf` extension surfaces a clear
+  `ValueError` instead of silently classifying a blank rendered page
+  as `success`)
 - **Embedding similarity** tiebreaker for ensemble consensus ties
 - **Pilot test** — validate classifications on a small sample before committing to the full run
 

{cat_stack-1.6.0 → cat_stack-1.6.1}/src/catstack/__about__.py

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2025-present Christopher Soria <chrissoria@berkeley.edu>
 #
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
-__version__ = "1.6.0"
+__version__ = "1.6.1"
 __author__ = "Chris Soria"
 __email__ = "chrissoria@berkeley.edu"
 __title__ = "cat-stack"

{cat_stack-1.6.0 → cat_stack-1.6.1}/src/catstack/_providers.py

@@ -19,6 +19,46 @@ import requests
 # short enough that batch ensembles don't stall for half an hour."
 _MAX_TOTAL_WAIT_SECONDS = 300.0
 
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# OpenAI reasoning_effort: per-model-family off-equivalent value.
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+#
+# Different OpenAI model generations expose different `reasoning_effort`
+# enum values. The "off" value (what `thinking_budget=0` maps to) is not
+# stable across families:
+#
+#   o1 / o3 / o4, gpt-5.0..gpt-5.3   → "minimal" (older floor)
+#   gpt-5.4 / gpt-5.5 / gpt-5.6      → "none"    (new strict-off; "minimal" deprecated)
+#
+# A model sent the wrong floor returns a 400 `unsupported_value`. The
+# table below is consulted in `_openai_reasoning_effort_floor()` to pick
+# the right value up-front. For unknown future families,
+# `UnifiedLLMClient.complete()` catches the 400 and falls back to "low"
+# (universally accepted across all reasoning_effort-supporting models).
+#
+# Entries are matched longest-prefix-first so "gpt-5.4" matches before
+# "gpt-5" — keep that invariant when extending.
+_OPENAI_REASONING_EFFORT_FLOORS = (
+    ("gpt-5.4", "none"),
+    ("gpt-5.5", "none"),
+    ("gpt-5.6", "none"),
+    ("gpt-5",   "minimal"),  # covers 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3
+    ("o1",      "minimal"),
+    ("o3",      "minimal"),
+    ("o4",      "minimal"),
+)
+
+
+def _openai_reasoning_effort_floor(model: str) -> str:
+    """Return the off-equivalent reasoning_effort value for a reasoning-
+    capable OpenAI model, based on its name prefix. Defaults to "minimal"
+    for models not covered by the table — the safest historical value."""
+    for prefix, floor in _OPENAI_REASONING_EFFORT_FLOORS:
+        if model.startswith(prefix):
+            return floor
+    return "minimal"
+
 __all__ = [
     # Main client
     "UnifiedLLMClient",
@@ -350,8 +390,18 @@ class UnifiedLLMClient:
 
         Args:
             force_json: If False and no json_schema, don't set response_format (for text responses)
-            thinking_budget: For OpenAI models, maps to reasoning_effort:
-                             0 or None → "minimal", >0 → "high"
+            thinking_budget: For OpenAI reasoning-capable models, maps to
+                             reasoning_effort. `thinking_budget=0` picks the
+                             provider's off-equivalent value from
+                             `_OPENAI_REASONING_EFFORT_FLOORS`
+                             ("none" for gpt-5.4+, "minimal" for o-series
+                             and gpt-5.0-5.3). `thinking_budget>0` maps to
+                             "high". If the chosen value is rejected at
+                             runtime with 400 `unsupported_value`,
+                             `complete()` retries with "low" (universally
+                             accepted) and caches the override on the
+                             client so subsequent calls skip the bad
+                             value.
         """
         payload = {
             "model": self.model,
@@ -388,7 +438,14 @@ class UnifiedLLMClient:
                 if thinking_budget > 0:
                     payload["reasoning_effort"] = "high"
                 else:
-                    payload["reasoning_effort"] = "minimal"
+                    # Off-equivalent value depends on the model family —
+                    # see `_OPENAI_REASONING_EFFORT_FLOORS`. A previously-
+                    # discovered fallback (from a 400 retry in complete())
+                    # wins if cached on the client.
+                    payload["reasoning_effort"] = (
+                        getattr(self, "_reasoning_effort_override", None)
+                        or _openai_reasoning_effort_floor(self.model)
+                    )
         elif creativity is not None:
             payload["temperature"] = creativity
 
@@ -637,7 +694,13 @@ class UnifiedLLMClient:
             creativity: Temperature setting (None for default)
             thinking_budget: Controls reasoning behavior per provider:
                 - Google: Token budget for extended thinking (0 to disable, >0 to enable)
-                - OpenAI: Maps to reasoning_effort (0 → "minimal", >0 → "high")
+                - OpenAI: Maps to reasoning_effort. `thinking_budget=0`
+                  picks the model's off-equivalent value from
+                  `_OPENAI_REASONING_EFFORT_FLOORS` ("none" for gpt-5.4+,
+                  "minimal" for older o-series / gpt-5.0-5.3). If the
+                  picked value is rejected at runtime, the client falls
+                  back to "low" (universally accepted) and caches the
+                  override. `thinking_budget>0` maps to "high".
                 - Anthropic: Enables extended thinking (0 to disable, >0 to enable with min 1024)
             force_json: If True and no json_schema, still request JSON output.
                        Set to False for text-only responses (e.g., CoVe intermediate steps)
@@ -693,15 +756,23 @@ class UnifiedLLMClient:
                             payload.pop("response_format")
                             continue  # Retry immediately without response_format
 
-                    # HF: some routers (notably Groq behind HF Inference
-                    # Providers, which serves Llama-3.x and gpt-oss) reject
-                    # `chat_template_kwargs` outright with
-                    #   "property 'chat_template_kwargs' is unsupported".
+                    # HF: some routers reject `chat_template_kwargs` outright.
+                    # The wording varies per router:
+                    #   Groq:      "property 'chat_template_kwargs' is unsupported"
+                    #   Fireworks: "Extra inputs are not permitted, field:
+                    #               'chat_template_kwargs'"
                     # The kwarg is only there to disable thinking on Qwen3-
                     # family models when thinking_budget=0 — dropping it on
                     # a router that doesn't honor it is harmless. Strip and
                     # retry, mirror the response_format pattern above.
-                    if "chat_template_kwargs" in error_text and "unsupported" in error_text:
+                    _ctk_rejected = (
+                        "chat_template_kwargs" in error_text
+                        and any(phrase in error_text for phrase in (
+                            "unsupported", "not permitted", "not allowed",
+                            "extra inputs", "extra fields", "unknown field",
+                        ))
+                    )
+                    if _ctk_rejected:
                         if "chat_template_kwargs" in payload:
                             if not getattr(self, '_warned_no_chat_template_kwargs', False):
                                 print(f"\n[CatLLM] Model '{self.model}' does not accept chat_template_kwargs.")
@@ -710,6 +781,31 @@ class UnifiedLLMClient:
                             payload.pop("chat_template_kwargs")
                             continue  # Retry immediately without chat_template_kwargs
 
+                    # OpenAI reasoning_effort enum varies across model
+                    # families — gpt-5.4+ deprecated "minimal" in favor of
+                    # "none"; older models reject "none". If the model
+                    # rejects our chosen value with 400 unsupported_value,
+                    # fall back to "low" (universally accepted across all
+                    # OpenAI reasoning-effort-supporting models) and cache
+                    # the override so subsequent calls skip the doomed
+                    # value. If "low" itself is rejected, drop reasoning_effort
+                    # entirely.
+                    if "reasoning_effort" in error_text and (
+                        "unsupported" in error_text or "invalid" in error_text
+                    ):
+                        current = payload.get("reasoning_effort")
+                        if current not in (None, "low"):
+                            if not getattr(self, '_warned_reasoning_effort_fallback', False):
+                                print(f"\n[CatLLM] Model '{self.model}' rejected reasoning_effort='{current}'.")
+                                print(f"  Falling back to 'low' and caching for subsequent calls on this client.\n")
+                                self._warned_reasoning_effort_fallback = True
+                            self._reasoning_effort_override = "low"
+                            payload["reasoning_effort"] = "low"
+                            continue
+                        elif current == "low" and "reasoning_effort" in payload:
+                            payload.pop("reasoning_effort")
+                            continue
+
                     # HuggingFace: try other routers when the current one
                     # rejects the model with a "wrong router" 400.
                     if self._is_hf_wrong_router_400(response.text):

{cat_stack-1.6.0 → cat_stack-1.6.1}/src/catstack/pdf_functions.py

@@ -39,16 +39,63 @@ def _anthropic_supports_pdf(model_name):
     return False
 
 
+def _is_likely_pdf(path) -> bool:
+    """True if the first 1024 bytes of `path` contain the PDF magic bytes
+    (`%PDF-`). PyMuPDF is permissive and will happily "open" an HTML
+    file saved with .pdf extension, render a junk page, and let the
+    downstream VLM produce a "successful" classification dict from
+    blank content. The cheap fix is to refuse files that don't have
+    the canonical PDF header before they reach PyMuPDF.
+
+    Scanning 1024 bytes (rather than checking offset 0 strictly) matches
+    what most PDF parsers do — the spec technically allows leading bytes
+    before the header (e.g. MIME-wrapped PDFs).
+    """
+    try:
+        with open(path, "rb") as f:
+            head = f.read(1024)
+        return b"%PDF-" in head
+    except OSError:
+        return False
+
+
 def _load_pdf_files(pdf_input):
-    """Load PDF files from directory path, single file path, or return list as-is."""
+    """Load PDF files from directory path, single file path, or return list as-is.
+
+    Files are validated against the PDF magic-byte header before being
+    returned — a single bogus path raises `ValueError`; bogus files
+    found during a directory glob are skipped with a warning. This
+    prevents PyMuPDF from silently rendering non-PDF content into
+    near-blank pages that then get classified as "success" downstream.
+    """
     import os
     import glob
 
     if isinstance(pdf_input, list):
-        pdf_files = pdf_input
-        print(f"Provided a list of {len(pdf_input)} PDFs.")
+        pdf_files = []
+        for path in pdf_input:
+            if not os.path.isfile(path):
+                raise FileNotFoundError(f"PDF input not found: {path}")
+            if not _is_likely_pdf(path):
+                raise ValueError(
+                    f"File '{path}' does not have a PDF header "
+                    f"(first 1024 bytes don't contain b'%PDF-'). "
+                    f"PyMuPDF would happily render it as a junk page "
+                    f"and the VLM would classify the result as 'success' — "
+                    f"refusing instead. Check the file is a real PDF."
+                )
+            pdf_files.append(path)
+        print(f"Provided a list of {len(pdf_files)} PDFs.")
     elif os.path.isfile(pdf_input):
         # Single file path
+        if not _is_likely_pdf(pdf_input):
+            raise ValueError(
+                f"File '{pdf_input}' does not have a PDF header "
+                f"(first 1024 bytes don't contain b'%PDF-'). "
+                f"PyMuPDF would happily render it as a junk page "
+                f"and the VLM would classify the result as 'success' — "
+                f"refusing instead. Check the file is a real PDF."
+            )
         pdf_files = [pdf_input]
         print(f"Provided 1 PDF file.")
     elif os.path.isdir(pdf_input):
@@ -62,7 +109,19 @@ def _load_pdf_files(pdf_input):
             if f.lower() not in seen:
                 seen.add(f.lower())
                 unique_files.append(f)
-        pdf_files = unique_files
+        # Filter out files that don't have the PDF header (e.g. a webpage
+        # saved with .pdf extension). Warn per skipped file so the user
+        # knows what didn't make it into the run.
+        validated = []
+        for f in unique_files:
+            if _is_likely_pdf(f):
+                validated.append(f)
+            else:
+                print(
+                    f"[CatLLM] Warning: skipping '{f}' — does not have a "
+                    f"PDF header (first 1024 bytes don't contain b'%PDF-')."
+                )
+        pdf_files = validated
         print(f"Found {len(pdf_files)} PDFs in directory.")
     else:
         raise FileNotFoundError(f"PDF input not found: {pdf_input}")