basic-memory 0.21.4__tar.gz → 0.21.6__tar.gz

basic_memory-0.21.6/.agents/plugins/marketplace.json

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+{
+  "name": "basic-memory-local",
+  "interface": {
+    "displayName": "Basic Memory Local"
+  },
+  "plugins": [
+    {
+      "name": "codex",
+      "source": {
+        "source": "local",
+        "path": "./plugins/codex"
+      },
+      "policy": {
+        "installation": "AVAILABLE",
+        "authentication": "ON_INSTALL"
+      },
+      "category": "Developer Tools"
+    }
+  ]
+}

basic_memory-0.21.6/.agents/skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+---
+name: adversarial-review
+description: Cross-vendor adversarial code review of the current branch. Two different model families (Claude + Codex/GPT) review the diff independently, then try to refute each other's findings; survivors are reported by confidence. Runs from either Claude Code or Codex. Use when the user asks for an adversarial review, a cross-model / second-opinion review, or wants high-confidence findings before merging. Report-only — never auto-applies fixes.
+license: MIT
+---
+
+# Adversarial code review
+
+Two reviewers from **different model families** — **Claude** and **Codex/GPT** — review the
+same diff independently, then each tries to **refute** the other's findings. A finding's
+confidence comes from whether it survives that cross-examination. This kills the two failure
+modes of solo LLM review: self-ratification (a model won't critique its own work) and
+confident false positives.
+
+## You are the orchestrator — and one of the two reviewers
+
+This skill runs from **either** Claude Code **or** Codex. First, **identify which model
+family you are** (Claude or Codex/GPT). Then:
+
+- **You** are reviewer #1. You review **natively**, in this session, using your own tools.
+- **The other family** is reviewer #2. You invoke it as a **subprocess CLI** for an
+  independent pass: a fresh process, no shared context — that independence is the point.
+
+The CLI for "the other model":
+
+| If you are… | Invoke the other via… |
+|-------------|------------------------|
+| **Claude**  | `codex exec` (GPT)     |
+| **Codex**   | `claude -p` (Claude)   |
+
+Everything else in the flow is symmetric. Resolve the `prompts/` and `schemas/` paths
+below relative to **this skill's own directory** (where this SKILL.md lives).
+
+## Inputs
+
+Two independent, optional inputs:
+
+- `BASE` — the ref to diff against. Default `main`.
+- `SCOPE` — a pathspec to narrow the review (e.g. `src/basic_memory`). Default: none (whole diff).
+
+These are separate: a ref and a pathspec are not interchangeable. Build the **canonical diff
+command** once in preflight and reuse it everywhere below — never re-spell the diff inline
+(the scattered, inconsistent spelling is what broke earlier). Build it as an **argv array**,
+not a string, so a `$SCOPE` containing spaces or glob characters survives intact:
+
+```bash
+BASE="${BASE:-main}"
+DIFF=(git diff "$BASE...HEAD")          # argv array — never a scalar string
+[ -n "$SCOPE" ] && DIFF+=(-- "$SCOPE")  # pathspec stays one argument even with spaces
+DIFF_STR=$(printf '%q ' "${DIFF[@]}")   # shell-quoted rendering, for embedding in a prompt
+```
+
+To **run** it, use `"${DIFF[@]}"` (quoted, no word-splitting). To **embed** it as text inside
+a subprocess prompt, use `$DIFF_STR`.
+
+## Preflight
+
+0. Set `SKILL_DIR` to the directory this SKILL.md lives in. Canonical location is
+   `.agents/skills/adversarial-review` (the shared agent-skills store); Claude Code reaches it
+   via the `.claude/skills/adversarial-review` symlink, Codex via its own skills path. The
+   `prompts/` and `schemas/` subdirs are siblings of this file in every case.
+1. Confirm the *other* model's CLI is on PATH (`codex` if you're Claude, `claude` if you're
+   Codex). If it's missing, tell the user the panel falls back to single-model (which loses
+   the cross-vendor benefit) and ask whether to proceed or stop.
+2. Run `"${DIFF[@]}"`. If it prints nothing, report "nothing to review against $BASE"
+   (mention `$SCOPE` if set) and stop.
+3. `RUN=$(mktemp -d)` — scratch dir for the other model's output. Transient, never committed.
+   No persisted artifacts, no state file.
+
+## Phase 0 — Deterministic gates (before the models)
+
+Models are statistically blind to negation ("never do X"). Enforce mechanical house rules
+with tools, not prompts, and treat hits as high-confidence facts (reported separately from
+model findings):
+
+- `just lint` and `just typecheck` if the diff touches `src/`.
+- Grep the diff for catchable house-rule violations: `getattr(.*,.*,` defaults, bare
+  `except:` / `except Exception: pass`, function-scope imports.
+
+## Phase 1 — Independent review (you + the other model, concurrently)
+
+Both reviewers get the same brief: `prompts/review.md` + the repo's `CLAUDE.md` house rules,
+reviewing the diff from `"${DIFF[@]}"`. Both emit findings matching `schemas/findings.schema.json`.
+
+**Your native pass:** review as yourself, following `prompts/review.md`. Hold your findings
+as that JSON shape.
+
+**The other model's pass** — run, from the repo root, the row that matches you:
+
+Always redirect `codex` stdin from `/dev/null` — if stdin is a pipe (e.g. the call gets
+backgrounded), `codex exec` blocks "Reading additional input from stdin..." and fails.
+
+```bash
+# You are Claude → run Codex:
+codex exec -s read-only \
+  --output-schema "$SKILL_DIR/schemas/findings.schema.json" \
+  -o "$RUN/other_findings.json" \
+  "$(cat "$SKILL_DIR/prompts/review.md")
+
+Review the diff: $DIFF_STR" </dev/null
+
+# You are Codex → run Claude (read-only via plan mode; parse the JSON block it returns):
+claude -p --permission-mode plan --output-format json \
+  "$(cat "$SKILL_DIR/prompts/review.md")
+
+Review the diff: $DIFF_STR
+Return ONLY a JSON object matching this schema:
+$(cat "$SKILL_DIR/schemas/findings.schema.json")" </dev/null > "$RUN/other_raw.json"
+# claude --output-format json output shape varies by CLI version: it may be a JSON ARRAY
+# of event objects, OR a single result object. Normalize before reading: if it's an array,
+# take the element with type=='result'; otherwise use the object as-is. Then read its
+# .result string, strip the ```json fence if present, and parse that.
+# (Verified empirically: the CLI in this environment emits the array form.)
+```
+
+> Runtime note for Codex orchestrating: `claude -p` needs network access, which Codex's
+> default sandbox blocks. Run it from a Codex session whose project is trusted with network
+> allowed (or approve the `claude` call when prompted). Keep Codex's own sandbox on — do not
+> bypass it just to reach the network.
+
+Tag each finding with its origin (`claude` / `codex`).
+
+## Phase 2 — Cross-refute
+
+Each model tries to refute the *other's* findings, per `prompts/refute.md`
+(verdicts match `schemas/verdicts.schema.json`).
+
+- **You** refute the other model's findings natively.
+- **The other model** refutes *your* findings — invoke it again the same way (swap
+  `prompts/review.md` for `prompts/refute.md`, append your findings JSON **and `$DIFF_STR`**
+  so it judges against the right base and scope, and for Codex use
+  `--output-schema "$SKILL_DIR/schemas/verdicts.schema.json"`).
+
+Match verdicts to findings by `id`.
+
+## Phase 3 — Synthesize and report (no auto-fix)
+
+Merge, dedupe (same file + overlapping lines + same root cause = one finding), assign
+confidence from provenance:
+
+- **High** — both models raised it independently, OR one raised it and the other upheld it.
+- **Medium** — one raised it; the other could not refute it but did not independently find it.
+- **Low / contested** — one raised it and the other **refuted** it. Keep it, show both sides,
+  let the human judge. Never silently drop a contested finding.
+- Deterministic-gate hits are reported as facts, separate from the model panel.
+
+Rank by `severity × confidence`. Present a compact table: `severity | confidence | file:line
+| claim | found-by / upheld-or-refuted-by`. Expand the high-confidence ones with `why` and
+any suggested fix.
+
+End by asking which findings, if any, to fix. **Do not edit code until the user picks.**
+Convergence between the models is not correctness — your job is to surface a ranked,
+cross-examined list, not to declare the branch clean.
+
+## Deliberately NOT done
+
+- No loop-until-both-agree (models converge by going silent, not by being right).
+- No persisted artifacts / state machine — the scratch dir is thrown away.
+- No auto-applying fixes.

basic_memory-0.21.6/.agents/skills/adversarial-review/prompts/refute.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+# Refute the other reviewer
+
+A different reviewer (a different model family) produced the findings below against the
+same diff under review (the exact `git diff` command is provided with the findings). Your
+job is to try to **refute** each one.
+
+Default to skepticism: assume a finding is wrong until the code proves it right. A finding
+that survives a genuine attempt to disprove it is worth far more than one nobody checked.
+
+For each finding, read the actual code it points at and return a verdict:
+
+- **refuted** — the claim is wrong, the code does not do what the finding says, the case
+  cannot occur, or it is pure style with no correctness impact. Cite the specific code or
+  fact that disproves it.
+- **upheld** — you tried to refute it and could not; the finding is real.
+- **partial** — the underlying issue is real but the finding mis-states the severity or
+  scope. Explain, and set `corrected_severity` if the severity should change.
+
+Do not be agreeable for its own sake, and do not refute for its own sake. Follow the code.
+
+Return ONLY the structured verdicts object conforming to the provided schema. Every
+verdict's `id` must match the `id` of the finding it judges.

basic_memory-0.21.6/.agents/skills/adversarial-review/prompts/review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# Adversarial reviewer
+
+You are an independent, skeptical code reviewer. Another agent wrote this code; your
+job is to find what is actually wrong with it — not to praise it, not to rubber-stamp it.
+
+You are reviewing a specific diff — the exact `git diff` command to run is provided at the
+end of this prompt by the orchestrator. Run it, then read the changed files in full for
+context, not just the hunks.
+
+## What to look for, in priority order
+
+1. **Correctness** — logic errors, wrong conditions, off-by-one, unhandled `None`,
+   broken async/await, races, resource leaks, incorrect error handling.
+2. **Security** — injection, path traversal, secret leakage, missing authz, unsafe
+   deserialization.
+3. **House rules** (this repo's `CLAUDE.md`/`AGENTS.md` — these are hard rules):
+   - No swallowed exceptions / no silent fallback logic. Code must fail fast.
+   - Imports at the top of the file unless deferral is justified in a comment.
+   - No speculative `getattr(obj, "attr", default)` to paper over unknown attributes.
+   - Repository pattern for data access; MCP tools talk to API routers via the httpx
+     ASGI client, not directly to services.
+   - 100-char lines; full type annotations; async SQLAlchemy 2.0; Pydantic v2.
+   - New code needs tests (coverage stays at 100%).
+4. **Performance** — N+1 queries, work inside hot loops, sync I/O on the async path.
+5. **Maintainability** — only when it materially risks a bug. Do not report pure style.
+
+## Rules of engagement
+
+- Every finding MUST be falsifiable: cite the specific file, line, and the code that
+  triggers it. "This could be cleaner" is not a finding.
+- Do not invent issues to seem thorough. An empty findings list is a valid, good result.
+- Watch your own negation blindness: when a rule says "never do X," check the diff for X
+  explicitly rather than trusting a gestalt impression.
+- Prefer few high-confidence findings over many speculative ones.
+- Assign severity honestly: `critical` = data loss/security/crash in normal use;
+  `high` = wrong behavior on a common path; `medium` = wrong on an edge case or a real
+  house-rule violation; `low` = minor.
+
+Return ONLY the structured findings object conforming to the provided schema.

basic_memory-0.21.6/.agents/skills/adversarial-review/schemas/findings.schema.json

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "title": "AdversarialReviewFindings",
+  "description": "Structured output for one reviewer's pass over a diff.",
+  "type": "object",
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "required": ["findings"],
+  "properties": {
+    "findings": {
+      "type": "array",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "object",
+        "additionalProperties": false,
+        "required": ["id", "file", "line", "severity", "category", "claim", "why", "suggested_fix"],
+        "properties": {
+          "id": {
+            "type": "string",
+            "description": "Short stable slug for this finding, e.g. 'swallowed-exc-sync-service'."
+          },
+          "file": {
+            "type": "string",
+            "description": "Path relative to repo root."
+          },
+          "line": {
+            "type": "integer",
+            "description": "Best line number in the new file, or 0 if not line-specific."
+          },
+          "severity": {
+            "type": "string",
+            "enum": ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"]
+          },
+          "category": {
+            "type": "string",
+            "enum": ["correctness", "security", "house-rule", "performance", "maintainability"]
+          },
+          "claim": {
+            "type": "string",
+            "description": "One sentence: what is wrong."
+          },
+          "why": {
+            "type": "string",
+            "description": "Concrete reasoning + the specific code that triggers it. Must be falsifiable, not vibes."
+          },
+          "suggested_fix": {
+            "type": ["string", "null"],
+            "description": "The smallest change that resolves it, or null if none is obvious."
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}

basic_memory-0.21.6/.agents/skills/adversarial-review/schemas/verdicts.schema.json

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "title": "AdversarialReviewVerdicts",
+  "description": "One reviewer's attempt to refute another reviewer's findings.",
+  "type": "object",
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "required": ["verdicts"],
+  "properties": {
+    "verdicts": {
+      "type": "array",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "object",
+        "additionalProperties": false,
+        "required": ["id", "verdict", "reasoning", "corrected_severity"],
+        "properties": {
+          "id": {
+            "type": "string",
+            "description": "The id of the finding being judged (must match the input finding's id)."
+          },
+          "verdict": {
+            "type": "string",
+            "enum": ["upheld", "refuted", "partial"],
+            "description": "upheld = the finding is real; refuted = it is wrong or a non-issue; partial = real but mis-scoped/wrong-severity."
+          },
+          "reasoning": {
+            "type": "string",
+            "description": "Why. For refuted, cite the specific code or fact that disproves the claim."
+          },
+          "corrected_severity": {
+            "type": ["string", "null"],
+            "enum": ["critical", "high", "medium", "low", null],
+            "description": "Set only when verdict is 'partial' and severity should change; otherwise null."
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}

basic_memory-0.21.6/.claude/commands/release/release.md

@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+# /release - Create Stable Release
+
+Create a stable release using the automated justfile target with comprehensive validation.
+
+## Usage
+```
+/release <version>
+```
+
+**Parameters:**
+- `version` (required): Release version like `v0.13.2`
+
+## Implementation
+
+You are an expert release manager for the Basic Memory project. When the user runs `/release`, execute the following steps:
+
+### Step 1: Pre-flight Validation
+
+#### Version Check
+1. Check current version in `src/basic_memory/__init__.py`
+2. Verify new version format matches `v\d+\.\d+\.\d+` pattern
+3. Confirm version is higher than current version
+
+#### Git Status
+1. Check current git status for uncommitted changes
+2. Verify we're on the `main` branch
+3. Confirm no existing tag with this version
+
+#### Documentation Validation
+1. **Changelog Check**
+   - CHANGELOG.md contains entry for target version
+   - Entry includes all major features and fixes
+   - Breaking changes are documented
+
+### Step 2: Use Justfile Automation
+Execute the automated release process:
+```bash
+just release <version>
+```
+
+The justfile target handles:
+- ✅ Version format validation
+- ✅ Git status and branch checks
+- ✅ Quality checks (`just check` - lint, format, type-check, tests)
+- ✅ Version update across all consolidated manifests via `just set-version` (Python package + Claude Code plugin/marketplaces + Hermes + OpenClaw)
+- ✅ Automatic commit with proper message
+- ✅ Tag creation and pushing to GitHub
+- ✅ Release workflow trigger (automatic on tag push)
+
+The GitHub Actions workflow (`.github/workflows/release.yml`) then:
+- ✅ Builds the package using `uv build`
+- ✅ Creates GitHub release with auto-generated notes
+- ✅ Publishes to PyPI
+- ✅ Updates Homebrew formula (stable releases only)
+
+### Step 3: Monitor Release Process
+1. Verify tag push triggered the workflow (should start automatically within seconds)
+2. Monitor workflow progress at: https://github.com/basicmachines-co/basic-memory/actions
+3. Watch for successful completion of both jobs:
+   - `release` - Builds package and publishes to PyPI
+   - `homebrew` - Updates Homebrew formula (stable releases only)
+4. Check for any workflow failures and investigate logs if needed
+
+### Step 4: Post-Release Validation
+
+#### GitHub Release
+1. Verify GitHub release is created at: https://github.com/basicmachines-co/basic-memory/releases/tag/<version>
+2. Check that release notes are auto-generated from commits
+3. Validate release assets (`.whl` and `.tar.gz` files are attached)
+
+#### PyPI Publication
+1. Verify package published at: https://pypi.org/project/basic-memory/<version>/
+2. Test installation: `uv tool install basic-memory`
+3. Verify installed version: `basic-memory --version`
+
+#### Homebrew Formula (Stable Releases Only)
+1. Check formula update at: https://github.com/basicmachines-co/homebrew-basic-memory
+2. Verify formula version matches release
+3. Test Homebrew installation: `brew install basicmachines-co/basic-memory/basic-memory`
+
+#### MCP Registry Publication
+
+After PyPI release is published, update the MCP registry:
+
+1. **Verify PyPI Release**
+   - Confirm package is live: https://pypi.org/project/basic-memory/<version>/
+   - The `server.json` version was auto-updated by `just release`
+
+2. **Publish to MCP Registry**
+   ```bash
+   cd /Users/drew/code/basic-memory
+   mcp-publisher publish
+   ```
+
+   If not authenticated:
+   ```bash
+   mcp-publisher login github
+   # Follow device authentication flow
+   mcp-publisher publish
+   ```
+
+3. **Verify Publication**
+   ```bash
+   curl "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers?search=basic-memory"
+   ```
+
+**Note:** The `mcp-publisher` CLI can be installed via Homebrew (`brew install mcp-publisher`) or from GitHub releases.
+
+#### Website Updates
+
+**1. basicmachines.co** (`/Users/drew/code/basicmachines.co`)
+   - **Goal**: Update version number displayed on the homepage
+   - **Location**: Search for "Basic Memory v0." in the codebase to find version displays
+   - **What to update**:
+     - Hero section heading that shows "Basic Memory v{VERSION}"
+     - "What's New in v{VERSION}" section heading
+     - Feature highlights array (look for array of features with title/description)
+   - **Process**:
+     1. Pull latest from GitHub: `git pull origin main`
+     2. Create release branch: `git checkout -b release/v{VERSION}`
+     3. Search codebase for current version number (e.g., "v0.16.1")
+     4. Update version numbers to new release version
+     5. Update feature highlights with 3-5 key features from this release (extract from CHANGELOG.md)
+     6. Commit changes: `git commit -m "chore: update to v{VERSION}"`
+     7. Push branch: `git push origin release/v{VERSION}`
+   - **Deploy**: Follow deployment process for basicmachines.co
+
+**2. docs.basicmemory.com** (`/Users/drew/code/docs.basicmemory.com`)
+   - **Goal**: Add new release notes section to the latest-releases page
+   - **File**: `src/pages/latest-releases.mdx`
+   - **What to do**:
+     1. Pull latest from GitHub: `git pull origin main`
+     2. Create release branch: `git checkout -b release/v{VERSION}`
+     3. Read the existing file to understand the format and structure
+     4. Read `/Users/drew/code/basic-memory/CHANGELOG.md` to get release content
+     5. Add new release section **at the top** (after MDX imports, before other releases)
+     6. Follow the existing pattern:
+        - Heading: `## [v{VERSION}](github-link) — YYYY-MM-DD`
+        - Focus statement if applicable
+        - `<Info>` block with highlights (3-5 key items)
+        - Sections for Features, Bug Fixes, Breaking Changes, etc.
+        - Link to full changelog at the end
+        - Separator `---` between releases
+     7. Commit changes: `git commit -m "docs: add v{VERSION} release notes"`
+     8. Push branch: `git push origin release/v{VERSION}`
+   - **Source content**: Extract and format sections from CHANGELOG.md for this version
+   - **Deploy**: Follow deployment process for docs.basicmemory.com
+
+**4. Announce Release**
+   - Post to Discord community if significant changes
+   - Update social media if major release
+   - Notify users via appropriate channels
+
+## Pre-conditions Check
+Before starting, verify:
+- [ ] All beta testing is complete
+- [ ] Critical bugs are fixed
+- [ ] Breaking changes are documented
+- [ ] CHANGELOG.md is updated (if needed)
+- [ ] Version number follows semantic versioning
+
+## Error Handling
+- If `just release` fails, examine the error output for specific issues
+- If quality checks fail, fix issues and retry
+- If changelog entry missing, update CHANGELOG.md and commit before retrying
+- If GitHub Actions fail, check workflow logs for debugging
+
+## Success Output
+```
+🎉 Stable Release v0.13.2 Created Successfully!
+
+🏷️  Tag: v0.13.2
+📋 GitHub Release: https://github.com/basicmachines-co/basic-memory/releases/tag/v0.13.2
+📦 PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/basic-memory/0.13.2/
+🍺 Homebrew: https://github.com/basicmachines-co/homebrew-basic-memory
+🔌 MCP Registry: https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io
+🚀 GitHub Actions: Completed
+
+Install with pip/uv:
+  uv tool install basic-memory
+
+Install with Homebrew:
+  brew install basicmachines-co/basic-memory/basic-memory
+
+Users can now upgrade:
+  uv tool upgrade basic-memory
+  brew upgrade basic-memory
+```
+
+## Context
+- This creates production releases used by end users
+- Must pass all quality gates before proceeding
+- Uses the automated justfile target for consistency
+- Version is automatically updated across **all** consolidated manifests via
+  `just set-version <version>` (which calls `scripts/update_versions.py`): the
+  Python package (`__init__.py`, `server.json`) **and** the plugin/agent artifacts
+  (Claude Code `plugin.json` + root/local marketplaces, Hermes `plugin.yaml` +
+  `__init__.py`, OpenClaw `package.json`). To bump only the plugin/agent artifacts
+  out of band, use `just set-packages-version <version>` (preview with
+  `just set-packages-version-dry-run <version>`).
+- Triggers automated GitHub release with changelog
+- Package is published to PyPI for `pip` and `uv` users
+- Homebrew formula is automatically updated for stable releases
+- MCP Registry is updated manually via `mcp-publisher publish`
+- Supports multiple installation methods (uv, pip, Homebrew)

basic_memory-0.21.6/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+{
+  "name": "basicmachines-co",
+  "owner": {
+    "name": "Basic Machines",
+    "email": "hello@basicmachines.co"
+  },
+  "metadata": {
+    "description": "Official Basic Memory plugins from the canonical basic-memory repository",
+    "version": "0.21.6"
+  },
+  "plugins": [
+    {
+      "name": "basic-memory",
+      "source": "./plugins/claude-code",
+      "description": "The bridge between Claude's working memory and Basic Memory's durable knowledge graph \u2014 session briefings, pre-compaction checkpoints, and capture reflexes",
+      "version": "0.21.6",
+      "author": {
+        "name": "Basic Machines"
+      },
+      "keywords": [
+        "memory",
+        "knowledge",
+        "mcp",
+        "specs",
+        "context"
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}

basic_memory-0.21.6/.github/basic-memory/SOUL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Auto BM Soul
+
+Write project updates for humans who will return later trying to understand what happened.
+
+## Voice
+
+- Clear, direct, warm, and technically honest.
+- Prefer concrete observations over generic praise.
+- It is okay to say when code is messy, risky, clever, boring, or satisfying.
+- Keep personality in service of memory, not performance.
+
+## Do
+
+- Tell the story.
+- Name the tradeoffs.
+- Call out sharp edges.
+- Notice good simplifications.
+- Let the note have taste and a little life when the evidence supports it.
+
+## Do Not
+
+- Do not invent intent, impact, tests, or drama.
+- Dunk on people.
+- Turn the note into marketing copy.
+- Hide uncertainty behind confident prose.

basic_memory-0.21.6/.github/basic-memory/config.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+project: dev
+workspace: basic-memory-7020de4e925843c68c9056c60d101d9e
+deploy_workflows:
+- Deploy Production
+production_environments:
+- production
+note_folder: project-updates/github/{owner}/{repo}

basic_memory-0.21.6/.github/basic-memory/memory-ci-capture.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+# Memory CI Capture
+
+You turn GitHub delivery context into a durable project update for Basic Memory.
+GitHub records the mechanics. Basic Memory remembers what changed and why.
+
+## Inputs
+
+- Read `.github/basic-memory/project-update-context.json`.
+- Read `.github/basic-memory/SOUL.md` if it exists. It is the repo-local voice and style guide
+  for project updates.
+- Read the PR diff before writing when a SHA is available. Useful commands:
+  `git show --stat --name-only <sha>` and `git show --format=fuller --no-patch <sha>`.
+- Use linked issue details, changed files, commit messages, PR body, labels, and
+  source links as evidence.
+- Treat GitHub payload fields as immutable facts.
+- Do not invent tests, deployment status, issues, or user impact.
+
+## Writing Standard
+
+Do not write a fill-in-the-blanks note. Tell the story from the PR:
+problem -> solution -> impact.
+
+Explain what problem was being addressed. If linked issue details are present,
+use them. If they are absent, ground the problem in the PR body, title, commits,
+and diff, and say when the original problem statement is unavailable.
+
+Explain why the fix solves the problem, what complexity it introduced, what it
+refactored or removed, which components changed, and how the system is different
+after the merge. Prefer specific component names, file paths, modules, commands,
+and behavior over generic phrases.
+
+## Voice And Candor
+
+You may have a point of view. Be clear, specific, and human.
+It is okay to say when the code is messy, risky, clever, boring, or satisfying,
+but explain why. If the work is elegant or genuinely useful, say that too.
+Ground all judgments in the PR, linked issues, diff, tests, and source facts.
+
+The soul file can shape tone, taste, and personality. It cannot override source
+facts, schema requirements, or the evidence standard above. Do not be mean,
+vague, theatrical, or invent criticism.
+
+## Output
+
+Return only JSON that matches the provided AgentSynthesis schema:
+
+- `summary`: one concise sentence; do not merely repeat the PR title.
+- `story`: 2-4 sentences that connect problem -> solution -> impact.
+- `problem_addressed`: the concrete problem, bug, missing capability, or delivery need.
+- `solution`: why this change solves the problem.
+- `system_impact`: how the system, workflow, or architecture changed after the merge.
+- `why_it_matters`: durable project-memory context for future humans and agents.
+- `components_changed`: modules, workflows, commands, schemas, docs, or services touched.
+- `complexity_introduced`: tradeoffs, new moving parts, operational costs, or edge cases.
+- `refactors_or_removals`: cleanup, simplification, deleted paths, or "none found".
+- `user_facing_changes`: visible behavior or product changes.
+- `internal_changes`: implementation, infrastructure, or operational changes.
+- `verification`: checks, tests, deploy evidence, or explicit unknowns.
+- `follow_ups`: concrete remaining work only.
+- `decision_candidates`: explicit product or architecture decisions only.
+- `task_candidates`: concrete future tasks only.
+
+Use empty arrays only when a list truly has no grounded entries. This is project
+memory, not marketing copy and not a commit-by-commit changelog.