adaptergate 0.5.1__tar.gz
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- adaptergate-0.5.1/LICENSE +189 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/NOTICE +53 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/PKG-INFO +437 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/README.md +396 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/pyproject.toml +68 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/setup.cfg +4 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/__init__.py +5 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/cli.py +588 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/core/__init__.py +0 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/core/procl.py +479 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/data/seed_recipes.jsonl +7 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/eval/__init__.py +0 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/eval/bird_eval.py +292 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/examples/__init__.py +0 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/examples/mock_scorer.py +98 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/gating/__init__.py +40 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/gating/cluster.py +119 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/gating/holdout_eval.py +153 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/gating/regression_gate.py +474 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/gating/replay_buffer.py +105 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/observability/__init__.py +0 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/observability/silent_collapse.py +334 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/recipes/__init__.py +33 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/recipes/models.py +151 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/recipes/recommend.py +142 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/recipes/store.py +100 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/serving/__init__.py +0 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate/serving/qwen_backend.py +148 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate.egg-info/PKG-INFO +437 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate.egg-info/SOURCES.txt +41 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate.egg-info/dependency_links.txt +1 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate.egg-info/entry_points.txt +2 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate.egg-info/requires.txt +26 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/src/adaptergate.egg-info/top_level.txt +1 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/tests/test_bird_eval.py +120 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/tests/test_cluster.py +157 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/tests/test_holdout_eval.py +111 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/tests/test_recipes.py +279 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/tests/test_regression_gate.py +194 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/tests/test_replay_buffer.py +86 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/tests/test_slice_attribution.py +193 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/tests/test_slice_attribution_robustness.py +101 -0
- adaptergate-0.5.1/tests/test_v04_retention.py +176 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Apache License
|
|
2
|
+
Version 2.0, January 2004
|
|
3
|
+
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
1. Definitions.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
"License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
|
|
10
|
+
and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
|
|
13
|
+
the copyright owner that is granting the License.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
"Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
|
|
16
|
+
other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
|
|
17
|
+
control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
|
|
18
|
+
"control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
|
|
19
|
+
direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
|
|
20
|
+
otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
|
|
21
|
+
outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
"You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
|
|
24
|
+
exercising permissions granted by this License.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
"Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
|
|
27
|
+
including but not limited to software source code, documentation
|
|
28
|
+
source, and configuration files.
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
"Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
|
|
31
|
+
transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
|
|
32
|
+
not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
|
|
33
|
+
and conversions to other media types.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
"Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
|
|
36
|
+
Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
|
|
37
|
+
copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
|
|
38
|
+
(an example is provided in the Appendix below).
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
"Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
|
|
41
|
+
form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
|
|
42
|
+
editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
|
|
43
|
+
represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
|
|
44
|
+
of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
|
|
45
|
+
separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
|
|
46
|
+
the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
"Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
|
|
49
|
+
the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
|
|
50
|
+
to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
|
|
51
|
+
submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
|
|
52
|
+
or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
|
|
53
|
+
the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
|
|
54
|
+
means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
|
|
55
|
+
to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
|
|
56
|
+
communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
|
|
57
|
+
and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
|
|
58
|
+
Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
|
|
59
|
+
excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
|
|
60
|
+
designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
"Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
|
|
63
|
+
on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
|
|
64
|
+
subsequently incorporated within the Work.
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
|
|
67
|
+
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
|
|
68
|
+
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
|
|
69
|
+
copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
|
|
70
|
+
publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
|
|
71
|
+
Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
|
|
74
|
+
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
|
|
75
|
+
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
|
|
76
|
+
(except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
|
|
77
|
+
use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
|
|
78
|
+
where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
|
|
79
|
+
by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
|
|
80
|
+
Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
|
|
81
|
+
with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
|
|
82
|
+
institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
|
|
83
|
+
cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
|
|
84
|
+
or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
|
|
85
|
+
or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
|
|
86
|
+
granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
|
|
87
|
+
as of the date such litigation is filed.
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
|
|
90
|
+
Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
|
|
91
|
+
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
|
|
92
|
+
meet the following conditions:
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
(a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
|
|
95
|
+
Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
(b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
|
|
98
|
+
stating that You changed the files; and
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
(c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
|
|
101
|
+
that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
|
|
102
|
+
attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
|
|
103
|
+
excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
|
|
104
|
+
the Derivative Works; and
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
(d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
|
|
107
|
+
distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
|
|
108
|
+
include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
|
|
109
|
+
within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
|
|
110
|
+
pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
|
|
111
|
+
of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
|
|
112
|
+
as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
|
|
113
|
+
documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
|
|
114
|
+
within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
|
|
115
|
+
wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
|
|
116
|
+
of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
|
|
117
|
+
do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
|
|
118
|
+
notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
|
|
119
|
+
or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
|
|
120
|
+
that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
|
|
121
|
+
as modifying the License.
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
|
|
124
|
+
may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
|
|
125
|
+
for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
|
|
126
|
+
for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
|
|
127
|
+
reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
|
|
128
|
+
the conditions stated in this License.
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
|
|
131
|
+
any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
|
|
132
|
+
by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
|
|
133
|
+
this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
|
|
134
|
+
Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
|
|
135
|
+
the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
|
|
136
|
+
with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
|
|
139
|
+
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
|
|
140
|
+
except as required for describing the origin of the Work and
|
|
141
|
+
reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
|
|
144
|
+
agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
|
|
145
|
+
Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
146
|
+
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
|
|
147
|
+
implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
|
|
148
|
+
of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
|
|
149
|
+
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
|
|
150
|
+
appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
|
|
151
|
+
risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
|
|
154
|
+
whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
|
|
155
|
+
unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
|
|
156
|
+
negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
|
|
157
|
+
liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
|
|
158
|
+
incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
|
|
159
|
+
result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
|
|
160
|
+
Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
|
|
161
|
+
work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
|
|
162
|
+
other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
|
|
163
|
+
has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
9. Accepting Warranty or Support. While redistributing the Work or
|
|
166
|
+
Derivative Works thereof, You may accept support, warranty, indemnity,
|
|
167
|
+
or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
|
|
168
|
+
License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
|
|
169
|
+
on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
|
|
170
|
+
of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
|
|
171
|
+
defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
|
|
172
|
+
incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
|
|
173
|
+
of your accepting any such warranty or support.
|
|
174
|
+
|
|
175
|
+
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
Copyright 2026 Kazdov
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
180
|
+
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
181
|
+
You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
182
|
+
|
|
183
|
+
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
186
|
+
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
187
|
+
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
|
|
188
|
+
implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions
|
|
189
|
+
and limitations under the License.
|
adaptergate-0.5.1/NOTICE
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
adaptergate
|
|
2
|
+
Copyright (c) 2026
|
|
3
|
+
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
This product builds upon the following research and software. All upstream
|
|
6
|
+
work is credited to its authors; this project's contribution is its
|
|
7
|
+
original implementation, integration, and the regression-gating system.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
============================================================================
|
|
10
|
+
PAPERS (algorithmic foundations)
|
|
11
|
+
============================================================================
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
ProCL — arXiv 2605.13162
|
|
14
|
+
"Continual Fine-Tuning of LLMs via Program Memory"
|
|
15
|
+
Used in: src/adaptergate/core/procl.py
|
|
16
|
+
Our contribution: independent re-implementation from the paper, bug fixes
|
|
17
|
+
(composition cross-terms, dtype handling, autograd reset), production
|
|
18
|
+
integration. The algorithm is credited to the paper authors.
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
Silent Collapse — arXiv 2605.14588
|
|
21
|
+
"Silent Collapse in Recursive Learning Systems"
|
|
22
|
+
Used in: src/adaptergate/observability/silent_collapse.py
|
|
23
|
+
Our contribution: independent re-implementation of the MTR framework.
|
|
24
|
+
The drift signature (H_g/H_0 < 0.5 with PPL_g/PPL_0 ≈ 1) is credited
|
|
25
|
+
to the paper authors.
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
Online-LoRA — arXiv 2411.05663
|
|
28
|
+
"Online-LoRA: Task-free Online Continual Learning via LoRA"
|
|
29
|
+
Concepts of online distribution-shift detection informed our
|
|
30
|
+
regression-gating design.
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
PreFT — arXiv 2605.14217
|
|
33
|
+
"Prefill-only Finetuning for Efficient Inference"
|
|
34
|
+
Referenced as a future integration once code is publicly released
|
|
35
|
+
by the authors. Not currently integrated.
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
N-LoRA / O-LoRA — arXiv 2408.06133, arXiv 2310.14152
|
|
38
|
+
Orthogonal LoRA subspace work, referenced in the regression-gating
|
|
39
|
+
literature review.
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
============================================================================
|
|
42
|
+
SOFTWARE
|
|
43
|
+
============================================================================
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
vLLM — https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm — Apache License 2.0
|
|
46
|
+
Used as serving backbone via its public Python API.
|
|
47
|
+
No source modifications are distributed in this repository.
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
bitsandbytes — Apache License 2.0
|
|
50
|
+
Used for 4-bit quantization.
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
transformers, peft, accelerate (HuggingFace) — Apache License 2.0
|
|
53
|
+
torch — BSD-3-Clause
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,437 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Metadata-Version: 2.4
|
|
2
|
+
Name: adaptergate
|
|
3
|
+
Version: 0.5.1
|
|
4
|
+
Summary: CI gate for per-tenant LoRA adapters that update online. Slice-level reject explain. Serving-stack agnostic.
|
|
5
|
+
Author: Kazdov
|
|
6
|
+
License: Apache-2.0
|
|
7
|
+
Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/OriginalKazdov/adaptergate
|
|
8
|
+
Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/OriginalKazdov/adaptergate
|
|
9
|
+
Keywords: llm,lora,regression,continual-learning,fine-tuning,evaluation
|
|
10
|
+
Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License
|
|
11
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11
|
|
12
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
|
|
13
|
+
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.13
|
|
14
|
+
Requires-Python: >=3.11
|
|
15
|
+
Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
|
|
16
|
+
License-File: LICENSE
|
|
17
|
+
License-File: NOTICE
|
|
18
|
+
Requires-Dist: typer>=0.12
|
|
19
|
+
Requires-Dist: pydantic>=2.9.0
|
|
20
|
+
Requires-Dist: rich
|
|
21
|
+
Provides-Extra: ml
|
|
22
|
+
Requires-Dist: torch>=2.5.0; extra == "ml"
|
|
23
|
+
Requires-Dist: transformers>=4.45.0; extra == "ml"
|
|
24
|
+
Requires-Dist: peft>=0.13.0; extra == "ml"
|
|
25
|
+
Requires-Dist: accelerate>=1.0.0; extra == "ml"
|
|
26
|
+
Requires-Dist: bitsandbytes; extra == "ml"
|
|
27
|
+
Requires-Dist: sentencepiece; extra == "ml"
|
|
28
|
+
Requires-Dist: protobuf; extra == "ml"
|
|
29
|
+
Requires-Dist: numpy; extra == "ml"
|
|
30
|
+
Requires-Dist: pandas; extra == "ml"
|
|
31
|
+
Requires-Dist: tqdm; extra == "ml"
|
|
32
|
+
Provides-Extra: serve
|
|
33
|
+
Requires-Dist: vllm; extra == "serve"
|
|
34
|
+
Provides-Extra: sql-example
|
|
35
|
+
Requires-Dist: sqlglot>=25.0.0; extra == "sql-example"
|
|
36
|
+
Provides-Extra: dev
|
|
37
|
+
Requires-Dist: pytest; extra == "dev"
|
|
38
|
+
Requires-Dist: ruff; extra == "dev"
|
|
39
|
+
Requires-Dist: ipython; extra == "dev"
|
|
40
|
+
Dynamic: license-file
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
# adaptergate
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
**CI gate for per-tenant LoRA adapters that update online.**
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
When a customer-specific LoRA adapter is about to be promoted to production,
|
|
47
|
+
`adaptergate gate` evaluates the candidate against a per-tenant held-out set
|
|
48
|
+
and refuses to promote it if aggregate quality drops more than ε. Rejected
|
|
49
|
+
adapters go to a replay buffer for later analysis. CI-friendly exit codes.
|
|
50
|
+
Serving-stack agnostic: you supply a scorer callable, we supply the gate.
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
When your held-out queries carry slice tags (intent, language, difficulty,
|
|
53
|
+
whatever) and natural-language text, adaptergate doesn't just say "score
|
|
54
|
+
dropped." It tells you **which behavioral slice broke**, **shows you the
|
|
55
|
+
failing query IDs**, and **describes what the failing queries have in
|
|
56
|
+
common** — the line your on-call PM screenshots into Slack at 2am.
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
```
|
|
59
|
+
$ adaptergate gate \
|
|
60
|
+
--tenant acme \
|
|
61
|
+
--candidate adapter_v19 \
|
|
62
|
+
--baseline adapter_v18 \
|
|
63
|
+
--holdout data/acme_holdout.jsonl \
|
|
64
|
+
--scorer my_eval:score
|
|
65
|
+
─────────────────────────────────── REJECTED ───────────────────────────────────
|
|
66
|
+
Tenant: acme
|
|
67
|
+
Candidate: adapter_v19
|
|
68
|
+
Baseline: adapter_v18
|
|
69
|
+
Score: 0.924 → 0.353 (Δ=-0.571, ε=0.02)
|
|
70
|
+
Held-out: n=25
|
|
71
|
+
Reason: REJECTED: aggregate 0.924 → 0.353 (Δ=-0.571) over n=25.
|
|
72
|
+
Drop exceeds ε=0.02.
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
DRIVER SLICE: intent=billing_dispute 0.946 → 0.113 (Δ=-0.834, 10/10 regressed)
|
|
75
|
+
Pattern: all 10 failing queries contain: "order_id", "refund"
|
|
76
|
+
Failing query IDs: billing_1, billing_2, billing_3, billing_4, billing_5 + 5 more
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
Slice breakdown (most-regressed first):
|
|
79
|
+
-0.834 10/10 regressed intent=billing_dispute
|
|
80
|
+
-0.396 15/15 regressed intent=order_status
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
25 unique queries regressed (slice n_regressed values may sum higher when
|
|
83
|
+
queries belong to multiple slices)
|
|
84
|
+
$ echo $?
|
|
85
|
+
1
|
|
86
|
+
```
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
That `Pattern: ...` line is N-gram frequency analysis — no LLM, no extra
|
|
89
|
+
dependencies, no cloud calls. Just the common words across failing queries.
|
|
90
|
+
Slack-paste-friendly by design.
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
---
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
## Why it exists
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
> *91% of production LLMs experience silent behavioral drift within 90 days.
|
|
97
|
+
> Detection lag from onset to first user complaint: 14-18 days.*
|
|
98
|
+
> — InsightFinder, 2026
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
The dominant failure mode for teams serving per-customer fine-tuned LLMs is
|
|
101
|
+
**silent regression on online updates**: a sub-skill (e.g. `JOIN-with-aggregate`
|
|
102
|
+
accuracy) collapses from 91% to 64% while the aggregate eval stays green at
|
|
103
|
+
87%, and you only find out when a customer Slacks support two weeks later.
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
### Where adaptergate sits in the landscape
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
Generic LLM eval CIs ([Braintrust](https://www.braintrust.dev/),
|
|
108
|
+
[DeepEval](https://deepeval.com/), [LangSmith](https://www.langchain.com/langsmith),
|
|
109
|
+
[Promptfoo](https://www.promptfoo.dev/), [W&B Registry](https://wandb.ai/site/automations/))
|
|
110
|
+
all support pre-deploy CI gating with non-zero exit on regression. They're
|
|
111
|
+
built for the case where the artifact under test is a **prompt or chain
|
|
112
|
+
commit**, scored against a single fixed dataset.
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
Runtime guardrails ([Galileo Luna-2](https://galileo.ai/luna-2),
|
|
115
|
+
[Arize](https://arize.com/), [Langfuse](https://langfuse.com/)) catch failures
|
|
116
|
+
after the model has shipped.
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
adaptergate is for the workflow those tools aren't built for:
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
- **Per-tenant scoping** — each customer has its own held-out set; regression
|
|
121
|
+
is measured against that customer's queries, not a shared benchmark.
|
|
122
|
+
- **Online update cadence** — every accepted user query may trigger a new
|
|
123
|
+
adapter version, not a quarterly retrain.
|
|
124
|
+
- **LoRA-adapter aware** — the artifact under test is a binary adapter, not
|
|
125
|
+
a prompt commit.
|
|
126
|
+
- **Replay buffer for rejected updates** — rejects don't disappear; they're
|
|
127
|
+
preserved with the full gate decision for later analysis or downstream
|
|
128
|
+
repair logic.
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
Closest neighbors:
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
- [Predibase / LoRAX](https://github.com/predibase/lorax) — per-tenant LoRA
|
|
133
|
+
*serving* and continuous fine-tuning, no CI gate primitive.
|
|
134
|
+
- [Baseten rank-1 LoRA continual learning](https://www.baseten.co/research/write-small-learn-forever/)
|
|
135
|
+
— same problem shape (shadow replica, ring buffer for rollback) but it's
|
|
136
|
+
research infrastructure, not a product, and has no per-tenant eval gate.
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
### What we measured
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
Reference run on Qwen 2.5 Coder 14B (4-bit, RTX 4090) with ProCL multi-LoRA
|
|
141
|
+
slots on BIRD-SQL `student_club`:
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
| | Before update | After update | Δ |
|
|
144
|
+
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
145
|
+
| `student_club` memorize set | 55.7% | 82.3% | **+26.6pp** |
|
|
146
|
+
| Held-out other DBs (forgetting check) | 45.0% | 55.0% | **+10.0pp** |
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
Zero catastrophic forgetting. The gate fires when this property breaks —
|
|
149
|
+
the moment a candidate update would have damaged the held-out other-DBs
|
|
150
|
+
score, it gets blocked.
|
|
151
|
+
|
|
152
|
+
---
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
## Install
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
```bash
|
|
157
|
+
pip install adaptergate
|
|
158
|
+
```
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
Core install is lightweight (typer + pydantic + rich). The gate doesn't
|
|
161
|
+
require torch, transformers, or any specific serving stack.
|
|
162
|
+
|
|
163
|
+
For the BIRD-SQL example or ProCL/Silent Collapse reference implementations:
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
```bash
|
|
166
|
+
pip install "adaptergate[ml]" # adds torch/transformers/peft/bitsandbytes
|
|
167
|
+
pip install "adaptergate[sql-example]" # adds sqlglot for the BIRD-SQL demo
|
|
168
|
+
```
|
|
169
|
+
|
|
170
|
+
---
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
## Quickstart
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
### 1. Write a scorer
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
176
|
+
A scorer is any Python callable `(adapter_id: str, query: dict) -> float`
|
|
177
|
+
returning a score in `[0.0, 1.0]`. You almost certainly already have one
|
|
178
|
+
for your eval suite — wire it up.
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
```python
|
|
181
|
+
# my_eval.py
|
|
182
|
+
def score(adapter_id: str, query: dict) -> float:
|
|
183
|
+
output = run_adapter(adapter_id, query["prompt"])
|
|
184
|
+
return float(matches_gold(output, query["gold"]))
|
|
185
|
+
```
|
|
186
|
+
|
|
187
|
+
### 2. Seed a held-out set
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
```bash
|
|
190
|
+
adaptergate holdout add \
|
|
191
|
+
--tenant acme \
|
|
192
|
+
--holdout data/acme_holdout.jsonl \
|
|
193
|
+
'{"question_id": "q1", "prompt": "...", "gold": "..."}'
|
|
194
|
+
# ... add at least 20 queries (configurable)
|
|
195
|
+
```
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
197
|
+
### 3. Run the gate
|
|
198
|
+
|
|
199
|
+
```bash
|
|
200
|
+
adaptergate gate \
|
|
201
|
+
--tenant acme \
|
|
202
|
+
--candidate adapter_v18 \
|
|
203
|
+
--baseline adapter_v17 \
|
|
204
|
+
--holdout data/acme_holdout.jsonl \
|
|
205
|
+
--scorer my_eval:score \
|
|
206
|
+
--epsilon 0.02 \
|
|
207
|
+
--audit-log data/audit.jsonl \
|
|
208
|
+
--replay-path data/rejected.jsonl
|
|
209
|
+
```
|
|
210
|
+
|
|
211
|
+
Exit code 0 = accepted (safe to promote). 1 = rejected. Use this in your
|
|
212
|
+
deploy script.
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
### 4. Try without writing any code
|
|
215
|
+
|
|
216
|
+
```bash
|
|
217
|
+
# 30 fake queries
|
|
218
|
+
for i in $(seq 1 30); do
|
|
219
|
+
adaptergate holdout add --tenant demo --holdout demo.jsonl \
|
|
220
|
+
"{\"question_id\": \"q$i\"}"
|
|
221
|
+
done
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
adaptergate gate \
|
|
224
|
+
--tenant demo \
|
|
225
|
+
--candidate adapter_good_v18 \
|
|
226
|
+
--baseline adapter_bad_v17 \
|
|
227
|
+
--holdout demo.jsonl \
|
|
228
|
+
--scorer adaptergate.examples.mock_scorer:score
|
|
229
|
+
```
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
---
|
|
232
|
+
|
|
233
|
+
## How the gate decides
|
|
234
|
+
|
|
235
|
+
```
|
|
236
|
+
accepted = (score_candidate - score_baseline) >= -epsilon
|
|
237
|
+
```
|
|
238
|
+
|
|
239
|
+
That's the headline rule. The gate runs the scorer against the held-out set
|
|
240
|
+
for both the candidate and the baseline, takes the average delta, and
|
|
241
|
+
compares to `epsilon` (default `0.02` = 2pp tolerance).
|
|
242
|
+
|
|
243
|
+
### Modes
|
|
244
|
+
|
|
245
|
+
- **Default (aggregate):** Reject if average drop > ε.
|
|
246
|
+
- **`--strict`:** Also reject if any single query that scored 1.0 on baseline
|
|
247
|
+
now scores less. Catches regression-via-averaging.
|
|
248
|
+
- **`--no-require-calibration`:** Allow promotion of a first adapter when no
|
|
249
|
+
baseline exists. Useful for bootstrapping a new tenant.
|
|
250
|
+
|
|
251
|
+
### Per-query breakdown
|
|
252
|
+
|
|
253
|
+
Every `GateDecision` includes `per_query`: a list of
|
|
254
|
+
`{query_id, score_baseline, score_candidate, delta}` records. Use it to
|
|
255
|
+
surface *which* queries regressed, not just *how much*.
|
|
256
|
+
|
|
257
|
+
```python
|
|
258
|
+
decision = gate.evaluate(...)
|
|
259
|
+
for q in decision.regressions:
|
|
260
|
+
print(q["query_id"], q["delta"])
|
|
261
|
+
```
|
|
262
|
+
|
|
263
|
+
---
|
|
264
|
+
|
|
265
|
+
## Recipe library — the answer to "what now?"
|
|
266
|
+
|
|
267
|
+
When the gate rejects with a driver slice, adaptergate can recommend
|
|
268
|
+
paper-derived intervention recipes ranked by **empirical efficacy across
|
|
269
|
+
prior applications**. Generic eval frameworks tell you *what* failed;
|
|
270
|
+
adaptergate v0.5+ tells you *what to do*, citing the paper each recipe
|
|
271
|
+
came from.
|
|
272
|
+
|
|
273
|
+
```bash
|
|
274
|
+
# Seed your recipe library from the bundled 7-recipe starter
|
|
275
|
+
adaptergate recipes seed --recipes data/recipes.jsonl
|
|
276
|
+
|
|
277
|
+
# After a gate rejects (audit log captures the decision)
|
|
278
|
+
adaptergate recommend-cmd \
|
|
279
|
+
--decision data/audit.jsonl \
|
|
280
|
+
--recipes data/recipes.jsonl \
|
|
281
|
+
--top-k 3
|
|
282
|
+
```
|
|
283
|
+
|
|
284
|
+
```
|
|
285
|
+
Recipes for driver slice: intent=billing_dispute
|
|
286
|
+
|
|
287
|
+
1. ProCL slot rebalance for the driver slice [no prior applications]
|
|
288
|
+
id: procl_slot_rebalance_v1
|
|
289
|
+
intervention: slot_rebalance
|
|
290
|
+
source: arXiv 2605.13162
|
|
291
|
+
Allocate a new ProCL program slot dedicated to the driver-slice queries...
|
|
292
|
+
|
|
293
|
+
2. Online-LoRA learning rate decay [no prior applications]
|
|
294
|
+
id: online_lora_lr_decay_v1
|
|
295
|
+
source: arXiv 2411.05663
|
|
296
|
+
Reduce the LoRA learning rate and re-run training...
|
|
297
|
+
```
|
|
298
|
+
|
|
299
|
+
The compounding mechanic, scope-honest:
|
|
300
|
+
|
|
301
|
+
- **Within a single store**: every recipe application you log via
|
|
302
|
+
``RecipeStore.add_application()`` strengthens the recommender's ranking
|
|
303
|
+
for that store. Recipes with positive empirical efficacy outrank fresh
|
|
304
|
+
entries. This works today.
|
|
305
|
+
- **Across tenants in a single store**: applications carry an anonymized
|
|
306
|
+
``tenant_hash``; queries that aggregate across tenants ("recipe X has
|
|
307
|
+
worked for N other tenants on this slice signature") will land in v0.6.
|
|
308
|
+
- **Across organizations** (your store vs. some other team's store): NOT
|
|
309
|
+
shipped. There is no centralized recipe-application service. Your
|
|
310
|
+
``applications.jsonl`` stays on your disk.
|
|
311
|
+
|
|
312
|
+
Seven seed recipes ship with the package: ProCL slot rebalance,
|
|
313
|
+
Online-LoRA LR decay, N-LoRA orthogonalization, Silent Collapse
|
|
314
|
+
trust-throttle, StableEdit localized patch (all paper-cited), plus
|
|
315
|
+
two heuristic recipes (replay-buffer prune, LoRA rank reduction —
|
|
316
|
+
explicitly tagged in the seed file as ``"(heuristic)"`` since they're
|
|
317
|
+
common practice rather than paper-cited). Load via
|
|
318
|
+
``adaptergate recipes seed --recipes data/recipes.jsonl``.
|
|
319
|
+
|
|
320
|
+
---
|
|
321
|
+
|
|
322
|
+
## CI integration & output formats
|
|
323
|
+
|
|
324
|
+
```bash
|
|
325
|
+
# Human-readable CLI output (default)
|
|
326
|
+
adaptergate gate --tenant acme --candidate v19 --baseline v18 \
|
|
327
|
+
--holdout data/acme.jsonl --scorer my_eval:score
|
|
328
|
+
|
|
329
|
+
# Structured JSON for piping into your own tooling
|
|
330
|
+
adaptergate gate ... --format json
|
|
331
|
+
|
|
332
|
+
# GitHub-flavored Markdown for PR comments
|
|
333
|
+
adaptergate gate ... --format pr-comment | gh pr comment "$PR" --body-file -
|
|
334
|
+
|
|
335
|
+
# Configurable failing-ID preview
|
|
336
|
+
adaptergate gate ... --show-failures 20
|
|
337
|
+
|
|
338
|
+
# Detect stale held-out sets
|
|
339
|
+
adaptergate gate ... --staleness-threshold-days 14
|
|
340
|
+
```
|
|
341
|
+
|
|
342
|
+
The CLI surfaces three kinds of warnings on stderr (so they survive
|
|
343
|
+
``--format json`` piping):
|
|
344
|
+
|
|
345
|
+
- **Malformed slices** — when a query's ``slices`` field is a string
|
|
346
|
+
instead of a list (common typo).
|
|
347
|
+
- **Suspected duplicate slice tags** — when two slice tags look alike
|
|
348
|
+
(e.g. ``"billing_dispute"`` and ``"intent=billing_dispute"``), reported
|
|
349
|
+
via ``GateDecision.suspected_duplicate_slices``.
|
|
350
|
+
- **Held-out staleness** — when your held-out set hasn't been refreshed
|
|
351
|
+
in N days. Stops you from misreading eval-set drift as adapter drift.
|
|
352
|
+
|
|
353
|
+
---
|
|
354
|
+
|
|
355
|
+
## What's in the box (v0.5)
|
|
356
|
+
|
|
357
|
+
```
|
|
358
|
+
adaptergate/
|
|
359
|
+
├── gating/
|
|
360
|
+
│ ├── regression_gate.py # RegressionGate + GateConfig + GateDecision + SliceAttribution
|
|
361
|
+
│ ├── holdout_eval.py # HoldoutSet — per-tenant queries, JSONL-backed, staleness check
|
|
362
|
+
│ ├── replay_buffer.py # ReplayBuffer — rejected updates with full decision
|
|
363
|
+
│ └── cluster.py # find_pattern() — N-gram failure pattern detection
|
|
364
|
+
├── recipes/
|
|
365
|
+
│ ├── models.py # Recipe + RecipeApplication + RecipeRecommendation
|
|
366
|
+
│ ├── store.py # RecipeStore — JSONL-backed library + application log
|
|
367
|
+
│ └── recommend.py # recommend(decision, store) — efficacy-ranked picks
|
|
368
|
+
├── data/
|
|
369
|
+
│ └── seed_recipes.jsonl # 7 seed recipes derived from May-2026 CL literature
|
|
370
|
+
├── cli.py # `adaptergate` entry point
|
|
371
|
+
└── examples/
|
|
372
|
+
└── mock_scorer.py # deterministic mock for trying things out
|
|
373
|
+
```
|
|
374
|
+
|
|
375
|
+
Tests: 92 unit tests across the gating subsystem, cluster, robustness,
|
|
376
|
+
recipes, and BIRD-SQL eval primitives. Run with `pytest`. Ruff-clean.
|
|
377
|
+
|
|
378
|
+
### Scope
|
|
379
|
+
|
|
380
|
+
**In:** per-tenant gate, slice-level attribution, driver slice, failing
|
|
381
|
+
query IDs, N-gram pattern of failing queries, replay buffer, audit log,
|
|
382
|
+
CI exit codes.
|
|
383
|
+
|
|
384
|
+
**NOT in (yet):** LLM-generated cause hypothesis, automatic counterfactual
|
|
385
|
+
training data, recipe library for repairs, multi-base-model orchestration,
|
|
386
|
+
hosted dashboard. See **Roadmap** below — these are deliberate omissions.
|
|
387
|
+
|
|
388
|
+
### Built on (cited, not invented)
|
|
389
|
+
|
|
390
|
+
adaptergate implements ideas from published research. See [NOTICE](./NOTICE)
|
|
391
|
+
for full attribution.
|
|
392
|
+
|
|
393
|
+
- **ProCL** — arXiv 2605.13162 — program-memory LoRA slot architecture
|
|
394
|
+
- **Silent Collapse / MTR** — arXiv 2605.14588 — drift detection framework
|
|
395
|
+
- **Online-LoRA** — arXiv 2411.05663 — task-free online LoRA updates
|
|
396
|
+
- **N-LoRA / O-LoRA** — arXiv 2408.06133, arXiv 2310.14152 — orthogonal subspaces
|
|
397
|
+
|
|
398
|
+
Our contribution: independent production implementations + the per-tenant
|
|
399
|
+
gating layer + slice-level attribution + N-gram failure-pattern detection +
|
|
400
|
+
audit log + replay buffer + CLI.
|
|
401
|
+
|
|
402
|
+
---
|
|
403
|
+
|
|
404
|
+
## Roadmap
|
|
405
|
+
|
|
406
|
+
**v0.1** — basic regression gate (✅ shipped)
|
|
407
|
+
**v0.2** — slice-level attribution + driver slice + failing IDs (✅ shipped)
|
|
408
|
+
**v0.3** — N-gram failure pattern + robustness fixes (✅ shipped)
|
|
409
|
+
**v0.4** — `--format json/pr-comment`, `--show-failures N`, duplicate-slice
|
|
410
|
+
detection, holdout staleness check (✅ shipped)
|
|
411
|
+
**v0.5** — **recipe library** + `observed_efficacy` + `recommend()` API +
|
|
412
|
+
7 seeded paper-derived recipes (✅ this release — the moat substrate)
|
|
413
|
+
|
|
414
|
+
**v0.5.x / v0.6**:
|
|
415
|
+
- Automated radar.db → recipe ingestion (LLM-extracted typed recipes from
|
|
416
|
+
newly-published CL papers, with manual review queue)
|
|
417
|
+
- Cross-tenant pattern matching ("this regression style failed at N other
|
|
418
|
+
tenants") — emerges naturally as the application corpus grows
|
|
419
|
+
- Diff view (`adaptergate review --query X`) — needs scorer-contract change
|
|
420
|
+
- Baseline drift handling — gate currently assumes baseline is ground
|
|
421
|
+
truth, wrong for online-updating adapters
|
|
422
|
+
- GitHub PR comment action (wrap `--format pr-comment` in a reusable action)
|
|
423
|
+
|
|
424
|
+
---
|
|
425
|
+
|
|
426
|
+
## Status
|
|
427
|
+
|
|
428
|
+
**v0.5 — early but production-tested.** 92 tests, ruff clean, wheel built
|
|
429
|
+
clean. API may change before v1.0; the gate decision schema carries a
|
|
430
|
+
`schema_version` field so audit-log consumers can handle older records.
|
|
431
|
+
Issues and PRs welcome.
|
|
432
|
+
|
|
433
|
+
---
|
|
434
|
+
|
|
435
|
+
## License
|
|
436
|
+
|
|
437
|
+
Apache 2.0. See [LICENSE](./LICENSE) and [NOTICE](./NOTICE).
|