DaSPi 2.0.0__tar.gz → 2.2.0__tar.gz

daspi-2.2.0/PKG-INFO

@@ -0,0 +1,340 @@
+Metadata-Version: 2.1
+Name: DaSPi
+Version: 2.2.0
+Summary: Visualize and analyze your data with DaSPi. This package is designed for users who want to find relevant influencing factors in processes and validate improvements.
+Author-Email: =?utf-8?q?Reto_J=C3=A4ggli?= <reto@jaeggli.email>
+License: MIT
+Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/j4ggr/DaSPi
+Project-URL: Documentation, https://j4ggr.github.io/DaSPi/
+Project-URL: Changelog, https://j4ggr.github.io/DaSPi/CHANGELOG
+Requires-Python: >=3.13
+Requires-Dist: matplotlib>=3.11.0
+Requires-Dist: pandas>=3.0.3
+Requires-Dist: statsmodels>=0.14.6
+Requires-Dist: scipy>=1.18.0
+Requires-Dist: numpy>=2.5.0
+Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
+
+![pypi](https://badge.fury.io/py/daspi.svg)
+![licence](https://img.shields.io/github/license/j4ggr/daspi.svg)
+![GitHub last commit](https://img.shields.io/github/last-commit/j4ggr/daspi)
+
+![logo](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/logo.svg)
+
+# DaSPi — Process Analytics & Six Sigma in Python
+
+DaSPi helps engineers analyze and improve processes using statistical workflows.
+
+## 🎯 The Problem
+
+Process analysis in practice is fragmented:
+
+- Excel is error-prone and hard to scale  
+- Minitab / JMP are expensive and closed  
+- Python tools (pandas, scipy, statsmodels) are powerful but disconnected  
+
+👉 Engineers spend more time combining tools than improving processes.
+
+## ✅ The Solution
+
+DaSPi provides **integrated workflows for process analytics**:
+
+- Capability analysis (Cp, Cpk)  
+- Root cause analysis (ANOVA, regression)  
+- Statistical process control (SPC)  
+- Professional visualization  
+
+All in one consistent and intuitive interface.
+
+## 🚀 Four Flagship Workflows
+
+DaSPi provides **four ready-to-use workflows** that cover the complete quality cycle. Each workflow produces **visual output + interpretation** in under 20 lines of code.
+
+---
+
+### 📏 Workflow 1: Gage R&R Analysis
+
+**Verify your measurement system is capable before analyzing process data.**
+
+```python
+import daspi as dsp
+
+# Load data
+df = dsp.load_dataset("grnr_layer_thickness")
+
+# Step 1: Evaluate the gage itself (MSA Type 1)
+gage = dsp.GageStudyModel(
+    source=df,
+    target="result_gage",
+    reference="reference",
+    u_cal=df["U_cal"][0],
+    tolerance=df["tolerance"][0],
+    resolution=df["resolution"][0]
+)
+
+# Step 2: Evaluate repeatability & reproducibility (MSA Type 2)
+model = dsp.GageRnRModel(
+    source=df,
+    target="result_rnr",
+    part="part",
+    gage=gage,
+    u_av="operator"  # Operator variation
+)
+
+# Step 3: Visualize complete analysis
+chart_gage = dsp.GageStudyCharts(
+        gage,
+        stretch_figsize=1.5
+    ).plot(
+    ).stripes(
+    ).label(
+        fig_title='Gage Study Layer Thickness Measurement System',
+        sub_title='Measurement System Analysis (MSA Type 1)',
+        info=True)
+
+chart_rnr = dsp.GageRnRCharts(
+        model,
+        spread_accepted_limit=0.1,   # 10% threshold for acceptance
+        spread_rejected_limit=0.3,   # 30% threshold for rejection
+        u_accepted_limit=0.15,       # 15% uncertainty threshold
+        stretch_figsize=1.5
+    ).plot(
+    ).stripes(  # Adds acceptance zones
+    ).label(
+        fig_title='Gage R&R Layer Thickness Measurement System',
+        sub_title='Measurement System Analysis (MSA Type 2)',
+        info=True)
+```
+
+**Output:** Comprehensive measurement system evaluation with repeatability (EV), reproducibility (AV), variance components, ANOVA tables, and capability indices (Cg, Cgk).
+
+---
+
+### 📊 Workflow 2: Process Capability Analysis
+
+**Evaluate if your process meets specifications.**
+
+```python
+import daspi as dsp
+
+# Load data
+df = dsp.load_dataset("drop_card")
+spec_limits = dsp.SpecLimits(0, float(df.loc[0, "usl"]))
+
+# Analyze capability
+chart = dsp.ProcessCapabilityAnalysisCharts(
+    source=df,
+    target="distance",
+    spec_limits=spec_limits,
+    hue="method"
+).plot().stripes().label(
+    fig_title="Process Capability Analysis of Drop Card Data",
+    sub_title="Drop Card Distance Comparison between Two Methods",
+    target_label="Distance s (cm)",
+    info=True)
+
+chart.show()
+```
+
+**Output:** 5-panel analysis with Cp, Cpk, Pp, Ppk, distribution plots, and statistical interpretation.
+
+---
+
+### 🔍 Workflow 3: Root Cause Analysis
+
+**Identify which factors significantly impact your process.**
+
+```python
+import daspi as dsp
+
+# Load data
+df = dsp.load_dataset("painkillers-dissolution")
+
+# Fit model with automatic factor selection
+model = dsp.LinearModel(
+    source=df,
+    target="dissolution",
+    factors=["employee", "brand", "water", "catalyst"],
+    covariates=["temperature"],
+    order=2,
+)
+
+# Perform recursive elimination to select significant factors
+df_gof = pd.concat(model.recursive_elimination())
+
+# Visualize results
+chart_res = dsp.ResidualsCharts(model).plot().stripes().label(info=True)
+chart_param = dsp.ParameterRelevanceCharts(model).plot().stripes().label(info=True)
+```
+
+**Output:** Residual diagnostics + parameter effects with ANOVA tables and significance tests.
+
+---
+
+### 📈 Workflow 4: Statistical Process Control (SPC)
+
+**Monitor process stability and detect out-of-control conditions.**
+
+```python
+import daspi as dsp
+
+# Load process data
+df = dsp.load_dataset("grnr_spc")
+
+# Create control chart
+chart = dsp.JointChart(
+        source=df,
+        target='result',
+        feature=('measurement_order', ''),
+        nrows=1,
+        ncols=2,
+        width_ratios=[4, 1],
+        sharey=True,
+    ).plot(
+        dsp.Scatter
+    ).plot(
+        dsp.Line,
+        on_last_axes=True,
+    ).plot(
+        dsp.GaussianKDE,
+        hide_axis='feature',
+        visible_spines='target',
+    ).stripes(
+        mean=True,
+        control_limits=True,    # UCL/LCL at 3-sigma
+        agreement=3,            # 3-sigma agreement lines
+        strategy='norm',        # Use normal distribution for control limits
+    ).label(
+        fig_title='SPC Chart: Layer Thickness',
+        sub_title='Control limits at ±3σ',
+        target_label='Layer Thickness (µm)',
+        feature_label=('Measurement Order', ''),
+        info=True
+    )
+
+chart.show()
+```
+
+**Output:** Control chart with mean, control limits (UCL/LCL), specification limits, and trend analysis.
+
+## 🏭 Use Cases
+
+- **Manufacturing:** Monitor tolerances and reduce defects  
+- **Quality Engineering:** Automate Six Sigma DMAIC workflows  
+- **Process Optimization:** Identify key drivers of variation  
+- **Data Analysts:** Unify statistics and visualization in one tool  
+
+### 📊 Example Outputs
+
+#### MSA1: Gage Study (Single Reference)
+
+[![Gage R&R](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/gage_study_single_reference.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/gage_study_single_reference.png)
+
+#### MSA2: Gage R&R (Repeatability & Reproducibility)
+
+[![Gage R&R](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/gage_rnr_layer_thickness.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/gage_rnr_layer_thickness.png)
+
+#### Process Capability Analysis
+
+[![Process Capability](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/cpk-analysis_drop-card.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/cpk-analysis_drop-card.png)
+
+#### Root Cause Analysis (ANOVA)
+
+[![ANOVA Residuals](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/anova_dissolution_residues.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/anova_dissolution_residues.png)
+[![ANOVA Parameters](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/anova_dissolution_params.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/anova_dissolution_params.png)
+
+**formula:**
+
+dissolution ~ 26.8292 + 2.3750*employee[T.B] + 0.8375*employee[T.C] - 10.7500*brand[T.ZapPain] - 9.5167*water[T.tap] + 5.7167*brand[T.ZapPain]:water[T.tap]
+
+**Model Summary:**
+
+|     | hierarchical | least_parameter | p_least  | s        | aic        | r2       | r2_adj   | r2_pred  |
+| --- | ------------ | --------------- | -------- | -------- | ---------- | -------- | -------- | -------- |
+| 0   | True         | employee        | 0.023298 | 2.374693 | 224.835935 | 0.857379 | 0.840400 | 0.813719 |
+
+**Parameter statistics:**
+
+|                               |       coef |  std err |          t |        p |     ci_low |    ci_upp |
+| ----------------------------: | ---------: | -------: | ---------: | -------: | ---------: | --------: |
+|                     Intercept |  26.829167 | 0.839581 |  31.955433 | 0.000000 |  25.134824 | 28.523509 |
+|                 employee[T.B] |   2.375000 | 0.839581 |   2.828793 | 0.007133 |   0.680657 |  4.069343 |
+|                 employee[T.C] |   0.837500 | 0.839581 |   0.997522 | 0.324224 |  -0.856843 |  2.531843 |
+|              brand[T.ZapPain] | -10.750000 | 0.969464 | -11.088598 | 0.000000 | -12.706458 | -8.793542 |
+|                  water[T.tap] |  -9.516667 | 0.969464 |  -9.816417 | 0.000000 | -11.473125 | -7.560208 |
+| brand[T.ZapPain]:water[T.tap] |   5.716667 | 1.371030 |   4.169616 | 0.000149 |   2.949817 |  8.483516 |
+
+**Analysis of variance:**
+
+| Typ-I       |   DF |         SS |         MS |          F |        p |       n2 |
+| ----------- | ---: | ---------: | ---------: | ---------: | -------: | -------: |
+| employee    |    2 |  46.431667 |  23.215833 |   4.116891 | 0.023298 | 0.027960 |
+| brand       |    1 | 747.340833 | 747.340833 | 132.526821 | 0.000000 | 0.450027 |
+| water       |    1 | 532.000833 | 532.000833 |  94.340328 | 0.000000 | 0.320355 |
+| brand:water |    1 |  98.040833 |  98.040833 |  17.385695 | 0.000149 | 0.059037 |
+| Residual    |   42 | 236.845000 |   5.639167 |        nan |      nan | 0.142621 |
+
+**Variance inflation factor:**
+
+|             |   DF |      VIF |     GVIF | Threshold | Collinear |              Method |
+| ----------- | ---: | -------: | -------: | --------: | --------: | ------------------: |
+| Intercept   |    1 | 5.000000 | 2.236068 |  2.236068 |      True |           R_squared |
+| employee    |    2 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |  1.495349 |     False |         generalized |
+| brand       |    1 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |  2.236068 |     False |           R_squared |
+| water       |    1 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |  2.236068 |     False |           R_squared |
+| brand:water |    1 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |  2.236068 |     False | single_order-2_term |
+
+#### SPC: Control Chart with Mean, UCL/LCL, Specification Limits
+
+[![SPC Chart](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/spc_chart_layer_thickness.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/spc_chart_layer_thickness.png)
+
+## 🚀 Installation
+
+```bash
+pip install daspi
+```
+
+## 📚 Documentation
+
+- **[User Guide](https://j4ggr.github.io/DaSPi/guides/)** — Complete tutorials for each workflow  
+- **[API Reference](https://j4ggr.github.io/DaSPi/anova/)** — Detailed documentation  
+- **[3S Methodology](https://j4ggr.github.io/DaSPi/guides/3s-methodology/)** — Structured problem-solving
+
+## 🔧 Technical Features
+
+- **Centralized configuration** — Manage language, username, and styles globally  
+- **Multivariate visualization** — Explore complex relationships  
+- **Linear models & ANOVA** — Statistical inference made simple  
+- **Hypothesis testing** — Confidence intervals and p-values  
+- **Monte Carlo simulation** — Assess uncertainty  
+- **Process capability** — Cp, Cpk, Pp, Ppk calculations
+
+## ⚙️ Built on Proven Libraries
+
+DaSPi leverages the Python scientific stack:
+
+- **pandas** — Data manipulation  
+- **numpy** — Numerical computing  
+- **matplotlib** — Visualization  
+- **scipy** — Statistical functions  
+- **statsmodels** — Advanced statistics  
+
+## 👤 About
+
+DaSPi is created and maintained by **Reto Jäggli**, Data Scientist at Festo Microtechnology AG.
+
+The project is driven by a passion to make **process analytics and Six Sigma workflows more accessible in Python**.
+
+## ⚠️ Disclaimer
+
+DaSPi is under active development and may contain bugs.  
+Results should be validated with trusted statistical tools when required.
+
+## 🤝 Feedback & Contributions
+
+**If you use DaSPi in real-world process analysis:**  
+👉 I would love to hear your use case.
+
+Feedback, ideas, and contributions are very welcome.
+
+---

daspi-2.2.0/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+![pypi](https://badge.fury.io/py/daspi.svg)
+![licence](https://img.shields.io/github/license/j4ggr/daspi.svg)
+![GitHub last commit](https://img.shields.io/github/last-commit/j4ggr/daspi)
+
+![logo](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/logo.svg)
+
+# DaSPi — Process Analytics & Six Sigma in Python
+
+DaSPi helps engineers analyze and improve processes using statistical workflows.
+
+## 🎯 The Problem
+
+Process analysis in practice is fragmented:
+
+- Excel is error-prone and hard to scale  
+- Minitab / JMP are expensive and closed  
+- Python tools (pandas, scipy, statsmodels) are powerful but disconnected  
+
+👉 Engineers spend more time combining tools than improving processes.
+
+## ✅ The Solution
+
+DaSPi provides **integrated workflows for process analytics**:
+
+- Capability analysis (Cp, Cpk)  
+- Root cause analysis (ANOVA, regression)  
+- Statistical process control (SPC)  
+- Professional visualization  
+
+All in one consistent and intuitive interface.
+
+## 🚀 Four Flagship Workflows
+
+DaSPi provides **four ready-to-use workflows** that cover the complete quality cycle. Each workflow produces **visual output + interpretation** in under 20 lines of code.
+
+---
+
+### 📏 Workflow 1: Gage R&R Analysis
+
+**Verify your measurement system is capable before analyzing process data.**
+
+```python
+import daspi as dsp
+
+# Load data
+df = dsp.load_dataset("grnr_layer_thickness")
+
+# Step 1: Evaluate the gage itself (MSA Type 1)
+gage = dsp.GageStudyModel(
+    source=df,
+    target="result_gage",
+    reference="reference",
+    u_cal=df["U_cal"][0],
+    tolerance=df["tolerance"][0],
+    resolution=df["resolution"][0]
+)
+
+# Step 2: Evaluate repeatability & reproducibility (MSA Type 2)
+model = dsp.GageRnRModel(
+    source=df,
+    target="result_rnr",
+    part="part",
+    gage=gage,
+    u_av="operator"  # Operator variation
+)
+
+# Step 3: Visualize complete analysis
+chart_gage = dsp.GageStudyCharts(
+        gage,
+        stretch_figsize=1.5
+    ).plot(
+    ).stripes(
+    ).label(
+        fig_title='Gage Study Layer Thickness Measurement System',
+        sub_title='Measurement System Analysis (MSA Type 1)',
+        info=True)
+
+chart_rnr = dsp.GageRnRCharts(
+        model,
+        spread_accepted_limit=0.1,   # 10% threshold for acceptance
+        spread_rejected_limit=0.3,   # 30% threshold for rejection
+        u_accepted_limit=0.15,       # 15% uncertainty threshold
+        stretch_figsize=1.5
+    ).plot(
+    ).stripes(  # Adds acceptance zones
+    ).label(
+        fig_title='Gage R&R Layer Thickness Measurement System',
+        sub_title='Measurement System Analysis (MSA Type 2)',
+        info=True)
+```
+
+**Output:** Comprehensive measurement system evaluation with repeatability (EV), reproducibility (AV), variance components, ANOVA tables, and capability indices (Cg, Cgk).
+
+---
+
+### 📊 Workflow 2: Process Capability Analysis
+
+**Evaluate if your process meets specifications.**
+
+```python
+import daspi as dsp
+
+# Load data
+df = dsp.load_dataset("drop_card")
+spec_limits = dsp.SpecLimits(0, float(df.loc[0, "usl"]))
+
+# Analyze capability
+chart = dsp.ProcessCapabilityAnalysisCharts(
+    source=df,
+    target="distance",
+    spec_limits=spec_limits,
+    hue="method"
+).plot().stripes().label(
+    fig_title="Process Capability Analysis of Drop Card Data",
+    sub_title="Drop Card Distance Comparison between Two Methods",
+    target_label="Distance s (cm)",
+    info=True)
+
+chart.show()
+```
+
+**Output:** 5-panel analysis with Cp, Cpk, Pp, Ppk, distribution plots, and statistical interpretation.
+
+---
+
+### 🔍 Workflow 3: Root Cause Analysis
+
+**Identify which factors significantly impact your process.**
+
+```python
+import daspi as dsp
+
+# Load data
+df = dsp.load_dataset("painkillers-dissolution")
+
+# Fit model with automatic factor selection
+model = dsp.LinearModel(
+    source=df,
+    target="dissolution",
+    factors=["employee", "brand", "water", "catalyst"],
+    covariates=["temperature"],
+    order=2,
+)
+
+# Perform recursive elimination to select significant factors
+df_gof = pd.concat(model.recursive_elimination())
+
+# Visualize results
+chart_res = dsp.ResidualsCharts(model).plot().stripes().label(info=True)
+chart_param = dsp.ParameterRelevanceCharts(model).plot().stripes().label(info=True)
+```
+
+**Output:** Residual diagnostics + parameter effects with ANOVA tables and significance tests.
+
+---
+
+### 📈 Workflow 4: Statistical Process Control (SPC)
+
+**Monitor process stability and detect out-of-control conditions.**
+
+```python
+import daspi as dsp
+
+# Load process data
+df = dsp.load_dataset("grnr_spc")
+
+# Create control chart
+chart = dsp.JointChart(
+        source=df,
+        target='result',
+        feature=('measurement_order', ''),
+        nrows=1,
+        ncols=2,
+        width_ratios=[4, 1],
+        sharey=True,
+    ).plot(
+        dsp.Scatter
+    ).plot(
+        dsp.Line,
+        on_last_axes=True,
+    ).plot(
+        dsp.GaussianKDE,
+        hide_axis='feature',
+        visible_spines='target',
+    ).stripes(
+        mean=True,
+        control_limits=True,    # UCL/LCL at 3-sigma
+        agreement=3,            # 3-sigma agreement lines
+        strategy='norm',        # Use normal distribution for control limits
+    ).label(
+        fig_title='SPC Chart: Layer Thickness',
+        sub_title='Control limits at ±3σ',
+        target_label='Layer Thickness (µm)',
+        feature_label=('Measurement Order', ''),
+        info=True
+    )
+
+chart.show()
+```
+
+**Output:** Control chart with mean, control limits (UCL/LCL), specification limits, and trend analysis.
+
+## 🏭 Use Cases
+
+- **Manufacturing:** Monitor tolerances and reduce defects  
+- **Quality Engineering:** Automate Six Sigma DMAIC workflows  
+- **Process Optimization:** Identify key drivers of variation  
+- **Data Analysts:** Unify statistics and visualization in one tool  
+
+### 📊 Example Outputs
+
+#### MSA1: Gage Study (Single Reference)
+
+[![Gage R&R](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/gage_study_single_reference.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/gage_study_single_reference.png)
+
+#### MSA2: Gage R&R (Repeatability & Reproducibility)
+
+[![Gage R&R](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/gage_rnr_layer_thickness.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/gage_rnr_layer_thickness.png)
+
+#### Process Capability Analysis
+
+[![Process Capability](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/cpk-analysis_drop-card.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/cpk-analysis_drop-card.png)
+
+#### Root Cause Analysis (ANOVA)
+
+[![ANOVA Residuals](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/anova_dissolution_residues.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/anova_dissolution_residues.png)
+[![ANOVA Parameters](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/anova_dissolution_params.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/anova_dissolution_params.png)
+
+**formula:**
+
+dissolution ~ 26.8292 + 2.3750*employee[T.B] + 0.8375*employee[T.C] - 10.7500*brand[T.ZapPain] - 9.5167*water[T.tap] + 5.7167*brand[T.ZapPain]:water[T.tap]
+
+**Model Summary:**
+
+|     | hierarchical | least_parameter | p_least  | s        | aic        | r2       | r2_adj   | r2_pred  |
+| --- | ------------ | --------------- | -------- | -------- | ---------- | -------- | -------- | -------- |
+| 0   | True         | employee        | 0.023298 | 2.374693 | 224.835935 | 0.857379 | 0.840400 | 0.813719 |
+
+**Parameter statistics:**
+
+|                               |       coef |  std err |          t |        p |     ci_low |    ci_upp |
+| ----------------------------: | ---------: | -------: | ---------: | -------: | ---------: | --------: |
+|                     Intercept |  26.829167 | 0.839581 |  31.955433 | 0.000000 |  25.134824 | 28.523509 |
+|                 employee[T.B] |   2.375000 | 0.839581 |   2.828793 | 0.007133 |   0.680657 |  4.069343 |
+|                 employee[T.C] |   0.837500 | 0.839581 |   0.997522 | 0.324224 |  -0.856843 |  2.531843 |
+|              brand[T.ZapPain] | -10.750000 | 0.969464 | -11.088598 | 0.000000 | -12.706458 | -8.793542 |
+|                  water[T.tap] |  -9.516667 | 0.969464 |  -9.816417 | 0.000000 | -11.473125 | -7.560208 |
+| brand[T.ZapPain]:water[T.tap] |   5.716667 | 1.371030 |   4.169616 | 0.000149 |   2.949817 |  8.483516 |
+
+**Analysis of variance:**
+
+| Typ-I       |   DF |         SS |         MS |          F |        p |       n2 |
+| ----------- | ---: | ---------: | ---------: | ---------: | -------: | -------: |
+| employee    |    2 |  46.431667 |  23.215833 |   4.116891 | 0.023298 | 0.027960 |
+| brand       |    1 | 747.340833 | 747.340833 | 132.526821 | 0.000000 | 0.450027 |
+| water       |    1 | 532.000833 | 532.000833 |  94.340328 | 0.000000 | 0.320355 |
+| brand:water |    1 |  98.040833 |  98.040833 |  17.385695 | 0.000149 | 0.059037 |
+| Residual    |   42 | 236.845000 |   5.639167 |        nan |      nan | 0.142621 |
+
+**Variance inflation factor:**
+
+|             |   DF |      VIF |     GVIF | Threshold | Collinear |              Method |
+| ----------- | ---: | -------: | -------: | --------: | --------: | ------------------: |
+| Intercept   |    1 | 5.000000 | 2.236068 |  2.236068 |      True |           R_squared |
+| employee    |    2 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |  1.495349 |     False |         generalized |
+| brand       |    1 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |  2.236068 |     False |           R_squared |
+| water       |    1 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |  2.236068 |     False |           R_squared |
+| brand:water |    1 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |  2.236068 |     False | single_order-2_term |
+
+#### SPC: Control Chart with Mean, UCL/LCL, Specification Limits
+
+[![SPC Chart](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/spc_chart_layer_thickness.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/j4ggr/DaSPi/main/docs/img/spc_chart_layer_thickness.png)
+
+## 🚀 Installation
+
+```bash
+pip install daspi
+```
+
+## 📚 Documentation
+
+- **[User Guide](https://j4ggr.github.io/DaSPi/guides/)** — Complete tutorials for each workflow  
+- **[API Reference](https://j4ggr.github.io/DaSPi/anova/)** — Detailed documentation  
+- **[3S Methodology](https://j4ggr.github.io/DaSPi/guides/3s-methodology/)** — Structured problem-solving
+
+## 🔧 Technical Features
+
+- **Centralized configuration** — Manage language, username, and styles globally  
+- **Multivariate visualization** — Explore complex relationships  
+- **Linear models & ANOVA** — Statistical inference made simple  
+- **Hypothesis testing** — Confidence intervals and p-values  
+- **Monte Carlo simulation** — Assess uncertainty  
+- **Process capability** — Cp, Cpk, Pp, Ppk calculations
+
+## ⚙️ Built on Proven Libraries
+
+DaSPi leverages the Python scientific stack:
+
+- **pandas** — Data manipulation  
+- **numpy** — Numerical computing  
+- **matplotlib** — Visualization  
+- **scipy** — Statistical functions  
+- **statsmodels** — Advanced statistics  
+
+## 👤 About
+
+DaSPi is created and maintained by **Reto Jäggli**, Data Scientist at Festo Microtechnology AG.
+
+The project is driven by a passion to make **process analytics and Six Sigma workflows more accessible in Python**.
+
+## ⚠️ Disclaimer
+
+DaSPi is under active development and may contain bugs.  
+Results should be validated with trusted statistical tools when required.
+
+## 🤝 Feedback & Contributions
+
+**If you use DaSPi in real-world process analysis:**  
+👉 I would love to hear your use case.
+
+Feedback, ideas, and contributions are very welcome.
+
+---