sauron-cli 1.2.0 → 1.3.0

package/OpenSpec-main/openspec/changes/archive/2025-12-29-unify-change-state-model/proposal.md

@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+# Proposal: Unify Change State Model
+
+## Problem Statement
+
+Two bugs create inconsistent behavior when working with changes:
+
+### Bug 1: Empty changes shown as "Completed" in view
+
+```typescript
+// view.ts line 90
+if (progress.total === 0 || progress.completed === progress.total) {
+  completed.push({ name: entry.name });  // BUG: total === 0 ≠ completed
+}
+```
+
+Result: `openspec new change foo && openspec view` shows `foo` as "Completed" when it has no content.
+
+### Bug 2: Artifact workflow commands can't find scaffolded changes
+
+```typescript
+// item-discovery.ts - getActiveChangeIds()
+const proposalPath = path.join(changesPath, entry.name, 'proposal.md');
+await fs.access(proposalPath);  // Only returns changes WITH proposal.md
+```
+
+Result: `openspec status --change foo` says "not found" even though the directory exists.
+
+## Root Cause
+
+The system conflates two different concepts:
+
+| Concept | Question | Source of Truth |
+|---------|----------|-----------------|
+| **Planning Progress** | Are all spec documents created? | File existence (ArtifactGraph) |
+| **Implementation Progress** | Is the coding work done? | Task checkboxes (tasks.md) |
+
+## Proposed Solution
+
+### Fix 1: Add "Draft" state to view command
+
+Keep Active/Completed with their existing meanings, but fix the bug:
+
+| State | Criteria | Meaning |
+|-------|----------|---------|
+| **Draft** | No tasks.md OR `tasks.total === 0` | Still planning |
+| **Active** | `tasks.total > 0` AND `completed < total` | Implementing |
+| **Completed** | `tasks.total > 0` AND `completed === total` | Done |
+
+### Fix 2: Artifact workflow uses directory existence
+
+Update `validateChangeExists()` to check if the directory exists, not if `proposal.md` exists. This allows the artifact workflow to guide users through creating their first artifact.
+
+### Keep existing discovery functions
+
+`getActiveChangeIds()` continues to require `proposal.md` for backward compatibility with validation and other commands.
+
+## What Changes
+
+| Command | Before | After |
+|---------|--------|-------|
+| `openspec view` | Empty = "Completed" | Empty = "Draft" |
+| `openspec status --change X` | Requires proposal.md | Works on any directory |
+| `openspec validate X` | Requires proposal.md | Unchanged (still requires it) |
+
+## Breaking Changes
+
+### Minimal Breaking Change
+
+1. **`openspec view` output**: Empty changes move from "Completed" section to new "Draft" section
+
+### Non-Breaking
+
+- Active/Completed semantics unchanged (still task-based)
+- `getActiveChangeIds()` unchanged
+- `openspec validate` unchanged
+- Archived changes unaffected
+
+## Out of Scope
+
+- Merging task-based and artifact-based progress (they serve different purposes)
+- Changing what "Completed" means (it stays = all tasks done)
+- Adding artifact progress to view command (separate enhancement)
+- Shell tab completions for artifact workflow commands (not yet registered)
+
+## Related Commands Analysis
+
+| Command | Uses `getActiveChangeIds()` | Should include scaffolded? | Change needed? |
+|---------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|----------------|
+| `openspec view` | No (reads dirs directly) | Yes → Draft section | **Yes** |
+| `openspec list` | No (reads dirs directly) | Yes (shows "No tasks") | No |
+| `openspec status/next/instructions` | Yes | Yes | **Yes** |
+| `openspec validate` | Yes | No (can't validate empty) | No |
+| `openspec show` | Yes | No (nothing to show) | No |
+| Tab completions | Yes | Future enhancement | No |
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+1. `openspec new change foo && openspec view` shows `foo` in "Draft" section
+2. `openspec new change foo && openspec status --change foo` works
+3. Changes with all tasks done still show as "Completed"
+4. All existing tests pass

package/OpenSpec-main/openspec/changes/archive/2025-12-29-unify-change-state-model/specs/cli-artifact-workflow/spec.md

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+# cli-artifact-workflow Specification Delta
+
+## MODIFIED Requirements
+
+### Requirement: Status Command
+
+The system SHALL display artifact completion status for a change, including scaffolded (empty) changes.
+
+> **Fixes bug**: Previously required `proposal.md` to exist via `getActiveChangeIds()`.
+
+#### Scenario: Show status with all states
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id>`
+- **THEN** the system displays each artifact with status indicator:
+  - `[x]` for completed artifacts
+  - `[ ]` for ready artifacts
+  - `[-]` for blocked artifacts (with missing dependencies listed)
+
+#### Scenario: Status shows completion summary
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id>`
+- **THEN** output includes completion percentage and count (e.g., "2/4 artifacts complete")
+
+#### Scenario: Status JSON output
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id> --json`
+- **THEN** the system outputs JSON with changeName, schemaName, isComplete, and artifacts array
+
+#### Scenario: Status on scaffolded change
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change <id>` on a change with no artifacts
+- **THEN** system displays all artifacts with their status
+- **AND** root artifacts (no dependencies) show as ready `[ ]`
+- **AND** dependent artifacts show as blocked `[-]`
+
+#### Scenario: Missing change parameter
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status` without `--change`
+- **THEN** the system displays an error with list of available changes
+- **AND** includes scaffolded changes (directories without proposal.md)
+
+#### Scenario: Unknown change
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec status --change unknown-id`
+- **AND** directory `openspec/changes/unknown-id/` does not exist
+- **THEN** the system displays an error listing all available change directories
+
+### Requirement: Next Command
+
+The system SHALL show which artifacts are ready to be created, including for scaffolded changes.
+
+#### Scenario: Show ready artifacts
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec next --change <id>`
+- **THEN** the system lists artifacts whose dependencies are all satisfied
+
+#### Scenario: No artifacts ready
+
+- **WHEN** all artifacts are either completed or blocked
+- **THEN** the system indicates no artifacts are ready (with explanation)
+
+#### Scenario: All artifacts complete
+
+- **WHEN** all artifacts in the change are completed
+- **THEN** the system indicates the change is complete
+
+#### Scenario: Next JSON output
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec next --change <id> --json`
+- **THEN** the system outputs JSON array of ready artifact IDs
+
+#### Scenario: Next on scaffolded change
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec next --change <id>` on a change with no artifacts
+- **THEN** system shows root artifacts (e.g., "proposal") as ready to create
+
+### Requirement: Instructions Command
+
+The system SHALL output enriched instructions for creating an artifact, including for scaffolded changes.
+
+#### Scenario: Show enriched instructions
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions <artifact> --change <id>`
+- **THEN** the system outputs:
+  - Artifact metadata (ID, output path, description)
+  - Template content
+  - Dependency status (done/missing)
+  - Unlocked artifacts (what becomes available after completion)
+
+#### Scenario: Instructions JSON output
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions <artifact> --change <id> --json`
+- **THEN** the system outputs JSON matching ArtifactInstructions interface
+
+#### Scenario: Unknown artifact
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions unknown-artifact --change <id>`
+- **THEN** the system displays an error listing valid artifact IDs for the schema
+
+#### Scenario: Artifact with unmet dependencies
+
+- **WHEN** user requests instructions for a blocked artifact
+- **THEN** the system displays instructions with a warning about missing dependencies
+
+#### Scenario: Instructions on scaffolded change
+
+- **WHEN** user runs `openspec instructions proposal --change <id>` on a scaffolded change
+- **THEN** system outputs template and metadata for creating the proposal
+- **AND** does not require any artifacts to already exist

package/OpenSpec-main/openspec/changes/archive/2025-12-29-unify-change-state-model/specs/cli-view/spec.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# cli-view Specification Delta
+
+## ADDED Requirements
+
+### Requirement: Draft Changes Display
+
+The dashboard SHALL display changes without tasks in a separate "Draft" section.
+
+#### Scenario: Draft changes listing
+
+- **WHEN** there are changes with no tasks.md or zero tasks defined
+- **THEN** system shows them in a "Draft Changes" section
+- **AND** uses a distinct indicator (e.g., `○`) to show draft status
+
+#### Scenario: Draft section ordering
+
+- **WHEN** multiple draft changes exist
+- **THEN** system sorts them alphabetically by name
+
+## MODIFIED Requirements
+
+### Requirement: Completed Changes Display
+
+The dashboard SHALL list completed changes in a separate section, only showing changes with ALL tasks completed.
+
+> **Fixes bug**: Previously, changes with `total === 0` were incorrectly shown as completed.
+
+#### Scenario: Completed changes listing
+
+- **WHEN** there are changes with `tasks.total > 0` AND `tasks.completed === tasks.total`
+- **THEN** system shows them with checkmark indicators in a dedicated section
+
+#### Scenario: Mixed completion states
+
+- **WHEN** some changes are complete and others active
+- **THEN** system separates them into appropriate sections
+
+#### Scenario: Empty changes not completed
+
+- **WHEN** a change has no tasks.md or zero tasks defined
+- **THEN** system does NOT show it in "Completed Changes" section
+- **AND** shows it in "Draft Changes" section instead
+
+### Requirement: Summary Section
+
+The dashboard SHALL display a summary section with key project metrics, including draft change count.
+
+#### Scenario: Complete summary display
+
+- **WHEN** dashboard is rendered with specs and changes
+- **THEN** system shows total number of specifications and requirements
+- **AND** shows number of draft changes
+- **AND** shows number of active changes in progress
+- **AND** shows number of completed changes
+- **AND** shows overall task progress percentage
+
+#### Scenario: Empty project summary
+
+- **WHEN** no specs or changes exist
+- **THEN** summary shows zero counts for all metrics

package/OpenSpec-main/openspec/changes/archive/2025-12-29-unify-change-state-model/tasks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Tasks: Unify Change State Model
+
+## Phase 1: Fix Artifact Workflow Discovery
+
+- [x] Update `validateChangeExists()` in `artifact-workflow.ts` to check directory existence instead of using `getActiveChangeIds()`
+- [x] Update error message to list all change directories (not just those with proposal.md)
+- [x] Add test for `openspec status --change <scaffolded-change>`
+- [x] Add test for `openspec next --change <scaffolded-change>`
+- [x] Add test for `openspec instructions proposal --change <scaffolded-change>`
+
+## Phase 2: Fix View Command
+
+- [x] Update `getChangesData()` in `view.ts` to return three categories: draft, active, completed
+- [x] Fix completion logic: `total === 0` → draft, not completed
+- [x] Add "Draft Changes" section to dashboard rendering
+- [x] Update summary to include draft count
+- [x] Add test for draft changes appearing correctly in view
+
+## Phase 3: Cleanup and Validation
+
+- [x] Clean up test changes (`test-workflow`, `test-workflow-2`)
+- [x] Run full test suite
+- [x] Manual test: `openspec new change foo && openspec status --change foo`
+- [x] Manual test: `openspec new change foo && openspec view` shows foo in Draft
+- [x] Validate with `openspec validate unify-change-state-model --strict`

package/OpenSpec-main/openspec/changes/archive/2025-12-30-add-antigravity-support/proposal.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+## Why
+Google is rolling out Antigravity, a Windsurf-derived IDE that discovers workflows from `.agent/workflows/*.md`. Today OpenSpec can only scaffold slash commands for Windsurf directories, so Antigravity users cannot run the proposal/apply/archive flows from the IDE.
+
+## What Changes
+- Add Antigravity as a selectable native tool in `openspec init` so it creates `.agent/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md` with YAML frontmatter containing only a `description` field plus the standard OpenSpec-managed body.
+- Ensure `openspec update` refreshes the body of any existing Antigravity workflows inside `.agent/workflows/` without creating missing files, mirroring the Windsurf behavior.
+- Share e2e/template coverage confirming the generator writes the proper directory, filename casing, and frontmatter format so Antigravity picks up the workflows.
+
+## Impact
+- Affected specs: `specs/cli-init`, `specs/cli-update`
+- Expected code: CLI init/update tool registries, slash-command templates, associated tests

package/OpenSpec-main/openspec/changes/archive/2025-12-30-add-antigravity-support/specs/cli-init/spec.md

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+# Delta for CLI Init
+
+## MODIFIED Requirements
+### Requirement: Slash Command Configuration
+The init command SHALL generate slash command files for supported editors using shared templates.
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Antigravity
+- **WHEN** the user selects Antigravity during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.agent/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.agent/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.agent/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** ensure each file begins with YAML frontmatter that contains only a `description: <stage summary>` field followed by the shared OpenSpec workflow instructions wrapped in managed markers
+- **AND** populate the workflow body with the same proposal/apply/archive guidance used for other tools so Antigravity behaves like Windsurf while pointing to the `.agent/workflows/` directory
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Claude Code
+- **WHEN** the user selects Claude Code during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.claude/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.claude/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.claude/commands/openspec/archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for CodeBuddy Code
+- **WHEN** the user selects CodeBuddy Code during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cline
+- **WHEN** the user selects Cline during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.clinerules/openspec-proposal.md`, `.clinerules/openspec-apply.md`, and `.clinerules/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** include Cline-specific Markdown heading frontmatter
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Crush
+- **WHEN** the user selects Crush during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.crush/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.crush/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.crush/commands/openspec/archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** include Crush-specific frontmatter with OpenSpec category and tags
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cursor
+- **WHEN** the user selects Cursor during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.cursor/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.cursor/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.cursor/commands/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Factory Droid
+- **WHEN** the user selects Factory Droid during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.factory/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.factory/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.factory/commands/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that include Factory-compatible YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
+- **AND** include the `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder in the template body so droid receives any user-supplied input
+- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for OpenCode
+- **WHEN** the user selects OpenCode during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.opencode/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.opencode/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.opencode/commands/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Windsurf
+- **WHEN** the user selects Windsurf during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Kilo Code
+- **WHEN** the user selects Kilo Code during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Codex
+- **WHEN** the user selects Codex during initialization
+- **THEN** create global prompt files at `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-proposal.md`, `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-apply.md`, and `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-archive.md` (or under `$CODEX_HOME/prompts` if set)
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that map the first numbered placeholder (`$1`) to the primary user input (e.g., change identifier or question text)
+- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec markers so `openspec update` can refresh the prompts without touching surrounding custom notes
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for GitHub Copilot
+- **WHEN** the user selects GitHub Copilot during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.github/prompts/openspec-proposal.prompt.md`, `.github/prompts/openspec-apply.prompt.md`, and `.github/prompts/openspec-archive.prompt.md`
+- **AND** populate each file with YAML frontmatter containing a `description` field that summarizes the workflow stage
+- **AND** include `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder to capture user input
+- **AND** wrap the shared template body with OpenSpec markers so `openspec update` can refresh the content
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Gemini CLI
+- **WHEN** the user selects Gemini CLI during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.gemini/commands/openspec/proposal.toml`, `.gemini/commands/openspec/apply.toml`, and `.gemini/commands/openspec/archive.toml`
+- **AND** populate each file as TOML that sets a stage-specific `description = "<summary>"` and a multi-line `prompt = """` block with the shared OpenSpec template
+- **AND** wrap the OpenSpec managed markers (`<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->` / `<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->`) inside the `prompt` value so `openspec update` can safely refresh the body between markers without touching the TOML framing
+- **AND** ensure the slash-command copy matches the existing proposal/apply/archive templates used by other tools
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for iFlow CLI
+- **WHEN** the user selects iFlow CLI during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.iflow/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.iflow/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.iflow/commands/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** include YAML frontmatter with `name`, `id`, `category`, and `description` fields for each command
+- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for RooCode
+- **WHEN** the user selects RooCode during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.roo/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.roo/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.roo/commands/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** include simple Markdown headings (e.g., `# OpenSpec: Proposal`) without YAML frontmatter
+- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers where applicable so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage

package/OpenSpec-main/openspec/changes/archive/2025-12-30-add-antigravity-support/specs/cli-update/spec.md

@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+# Delta for CLI Update
+
+## MODIFIED Requirements
+### Requirement: Slash Command Updates
+The update command SHALL refresh existing slash command files for configured tools without creating new ones, and ensure the OpenCode archive command accepts change ID arguments.
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Antigravity
+- **WHEN** `.agent/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
+- **THEN** refresh the OpenSpec-managed portion of each file so the workflow copy matches other tools while preserving the existing single-field `description` frontmatter
+- **AND** skip creating any missing workflow files during update, mirroring the behavior for Windsurf and other IDEs
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Claude Code
+- **WHEN** `.claude/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
+- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
+- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for CodeBuddy Code
+- **WHEN** `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.md`, `apply.md`, and `archive.md`
+- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
+- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Cline
+- **WHEN** `.clinerules/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
+- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
+- **AND** include Cline-specific Markdown heading frontmatter
+- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Crush
+- **WHEN** `.crush/commands/` contains `openspec/proposal.md`, `openspec/apply.md`, and `openspec/archive.md`
+- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
+- **AND** include Crush-specific frontmatter with OpenSpec category and tags
+- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Cursor
+- **WHEN** `.cursor/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
+- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
+- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Factory Droid
+- **WHEN** `.factory/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
+- **THEN** refresh each file using the shared Factory templates that include YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
+- **AND** ensure the template body retains the `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder so user input keeps flowing into droid
+- **AND** update only the content inside the OpenSpec managed markers, leaving any unmanaged notes untouched
+- **AND** skip creating missing files during update
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for OpenCode
+- **WHEN** `.opencode/command/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
+- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
+- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
+- **AND** ensure the archive command includes `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder in frontmatter for accepting change ID arguments
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Windsurf
+- **WHEN** `.windsurf/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
+- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates wrapped in OpenSpec markers
+- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
+- **AND** skip creating missing files (the update command only refreshes what already exists)
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Kilo Code
+- **WHEN** `.kilocode/workflows/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
+- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates wrapped in OpenSpec markers
+- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
+- **AND** skip creating missing files (the update command only refreshes what already exists)
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Codex
+- **GIVEN** the global Codex prompt directory contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
+- **WHEN** a user runs `openspec update`
+- **THEN** refresh each file using the shared slash-command templates (including placeholder guidance)
+- **AND** preserve any unmanaged content outside the OpenSpec marker block
+- **AND** skip creation when a Codex prompt file is missing
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for GitHub Copilot
+- **WHEN** `.github/prompts/` contains `openspec-proposal.prompt.md`, `openspec-apply.prompt.md`, and `openspec-archive.prompt.md`
+- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates while preserving the YAML frontmatter
+- **AND** update only the OpenSpec-managed block between markers
+- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for Gemini CLI
+- **WHEN** `.gemini/commands/openspec/` contains `proposal.toml`, `apply.toml`, and `archive.toml`
+- **THEN** refresh the body of each file using the shared proposal/apply/archive templates
+- **AND** replace only the content between `<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->` and `<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->` markers inside the `prompt = """` block so the TOML framing (`description`, `prompt`) stays intact
+- **AND** skip creating any missing `.toml` files during update; only pre-existing Gemini commands are refreshed
+
+#### Scenario: Updating slash commands for iFlow CLI
+- **WHEN** `.iflow/commands/` contains `openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md`
+- **THEN** refresh each file using shared templates
+- **AND** preserve the YAML frontmatter with `name`, `id`, `category`, and `description` fields
+- **AND** update only the OpenSpec-managed block between markers
+- **AND** ensure templates include instructions for the relevant workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Missing slash command file
+- **WHEN** a tool lacks a slash command file
+- **THEN** do not create a new file during update

package/OpenSpec-main/openspec/changes/archive/2025-12-30-add-antigravity-support/tasks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+## 1. CLI init support
+- [x] 1.1 Surface Antigravity in the native-tool picker (interactive + `--tools`) so it toggles alongside other IDEs.
+- [x] 1.2 Generate `.agent/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `openspec-apply.md`, and `openspec-archive.md` with YAML frontmatter restricted to a single `description` field for each stage and wrap the body in OpenSpec markers.
+- [x] 1.3 Confirm workspace scaffolding covers missing directory creation and re-run scenarios so repeated init refreshes the managed block.
+
+## 2. CLI update support
+- [x] 2.1 Detect existing Antigravity workflow files during `openspec update` and refresh only the managed body, skipping creation when files are missing.
+- [x] 2.2 Ensure update logic preserves the `description` frontmatter block exactly as written by init, including case and spacing, and refreshes body templates alongside other tools.
+
+## 3. Templates and tests
+- [x] 3.1 Add shared template entries for Antigravity that reuse the Windsurf copy but target `.agent/workflows` plus the description-only frontmatter requirement.
+- [x] 3.2 Expand automated coverage (unit or integration) verifying init and update produce the expected file paths and frontmatter + body markers for Antigravity.

package/OpenSpec-main/openspec/changes/archive/2025-12-30-fix-cline-workflows-implementation/proposal.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+## Why
+The Cline implementation was architecturally incorrect. According to Cline's official documentation, Cline uses workflows for on-demand automation and rules for behavioral guidelines. The OpenSpec slash commands are procedural workflows (scaffold → implement → archive), not behavioral rules, so they should be placed in `.clinerules/workflows/` instead of `.clinerules/`.
+
+## What Changes
+- Update ClineSlashCommandConfigurator to use `.clinerules/workflows/` paths instead of `.clinerules/` paths
+- Update all tests to expect the correct workflow file locations
+- Update README.md documentation to reflect workflows instead of rules
+- **BREAKING**: Existing Cline users will need to re-run `openspec init` to get the corrected workflow files
+
+## Impact
+- Affected specs: cli-init, cli-update (corrected Cline workflow paths)
+- Affected code: `src/core/configurators/slash/cline.ts`, test files, README.md
+- Modified files: `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-*.md` (moved from `.clinerules/openspec-*.md`)

package/OpenSpec-main/openspec/changes/archive/2025-12-30-fix-cline-workflows-implementation/specs/cli-init/spec.md

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+# Delta for CLI Init
+
+## MODIFIED Requirements
+### Requirement: Slash Command Configuration
+The init command SHALL generate slash command files for supported editors using shared templates.
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Antigravity
+- **WHEN** the user selects Antigravity during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.agent/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.agent/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.agent/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** ensure each file begins with YAML frontmatter that contains only a `description: <stage summary>` field followed by the shared OpenSpec workflow instructions wrapped in managed markers
+- **AND** populate the workflow body with the same proposal/apply/archive guidance used for other tools so Antigravity behaves like Windsurf while pointing to the `.agent/workflows/` directory
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Claude Code
+- **WHEN** the user selects Claude Code during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.claude/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.claude/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.claude/commands/openspec/archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for CodeBuddy Code
+- **WHEN** the user selects CodeBuddy Code during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.codebuddy/commands/openspec/archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cline
+- **WHEN** the user selects Cline during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.clinerules/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** include Cline-specific Markdown heading frontmatter
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Crush
+- **WHEN** the user selects Crush during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.crush/commands/openspec/proposal.md`, `.crush/commands/openspec/apply.md`, and `.crush/commands/openspec/archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** include Crush-specific frontmatter with OpenSpec category and tags
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Cursor
+- **WHEN** the user selects Cursor during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.cursor/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.cursor/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.cursor/commands/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Factory Droid
+- **WHEN** the user selects Factory Droid during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.factory/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.factory/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.factory/commands/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that include Factory-compatible YAML frontmatter for the `description` and `argument-hint` fields
+- **AND** include the `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder in the template body so droid receives any user-supplied input
+- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for OpenCode
+- **WHEN** the user selects OpenCode during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.opencode/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.opencode/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.opencode/commands/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Windsurf
+- **WHEN** the user selects Windsurf during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.windsurf/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Kilo Code
+- **WHEN** the user selects Kilo Code during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-proposal.md`, `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-apply.md`, and `.kilocode/workflows/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates (wrapped in OpenSpec markers) so workflow text matches other tools
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Codex
+- **WHEN** the user selects Codex during initialization
+- **THEN** create global prompt files at `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-proposal.md`, `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-apply.md`, and `~/.codex/prompts/openspec-archive.md` (or under `$CODEX_HOME/prompts` if set)
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates that map the first numbered placeholder (`$1`) to the primary user input (e.g., change identifier or question text)
+- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec markers so `openspec update` can refresh the prompts without touching surrounding custom notes
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for GitHub Copilot
+- **WHEN** the user selects GitHub Copilot during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.github/prompts/openspec-proposal.prompt.md`, `.github/prompts/openspec-apply.prompt.md`, and `.github/prompts/openspec-archive.prompt.md`
+- **AND** populate each file with YAML frontmatter containing a `description` field that summarizes the workflow stage
+- **AND** include `$ARGUMENTS` placeholder to capture user input
+- **AND** wrap the shared template body with OpenSpec markers so `openspec update` can refresh the content
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for Gemini CLI
+- **WHEN** the user selects Gemini CLI during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.gemini/commands/openspec/proposal.toml`, `.gemini/commands/openspec/apply.toml`, and `.gemini/commands/openspec/archive.toml`
+- **AND** populate each file as TOML that sets a stage-specific `description = "<summary>"` and a multi-line `prompt = """` block with the shared OpenSpec template
+- **AND** wrap the OpenSpec managed markers (`<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->` / `<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->`) inside the `prompt` value so `openspec update` can safely refresh the body between markers without touching the TOML framing
+- **AND** ensure the slash-command copy matches the existing proposal/apply/archive templates used by other tools
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for iFlow CLI
+- **WHEN** the user selects iFlow CLI during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.iflow/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.iflow/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.iflow/commands/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** include YAML frontmatter with `name`, `id`, `category`, and `description` fields for each command
+- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage
+
+#### Scenario: Generating slash commands for RooCode
+- **WHEN** the user selects RooCode during initialization
+- **THEN** create `.roo/commands/openspec-proposal.md`, `.roo/commands/openspec-apply.md`, and `.roo/commands/openspec-archive.md`
+- **AND** populate each file from shared templates so command text matches other tools
+- **AND** include simple Markdown headings (e.g., `# OpenSpec: Proposal`) without YAML frontmatter
+- **AND** wrap the generated content in OpenSpec managed markers where applicable so `openspec update` can safely refresh the commands
+- **AND** each template includes instructions for the relevant OpenSpec workflow stage