moveros 4.0.8 → 4.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/install.js +4 -2
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/src/hooks/context-staleness.sh +46 -46
- package/src/hooks/dirty-tree-guard.sh +33 -33
- package/src/hooks/engine-protection.sh +43 -43
- package/src/hooks/git-safety.sh +47 -47
- package/src/hooks/pre-compact-backup.sh +177 -177
- package/src/hooks/session-log-reminder.sh +135 -73
- package/src/skills/systematic-debugging/CREATION-LOG.md +119 -119
- package/src/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md +296 -296
- package/src/skills/systematic-debugging/condition-based-waiting-example.ts +158 -158
- package/src/skills/systematic-debugging/condition-based-waiting.md +115 -115
- package/src/skills/systematic-debugging/defense-in-depth.md +122 -122
- package/src/skills/systematic-debugging/find-polluter.sh +63 -63
- package/src/skills/systematic-debugging/root-cause-tracing.md +169 -169
- package/src/skills/systematic-debugging/test-academic.md +14 -14
- package/src/skills/systematic-debugging/test-pressure-1.md +58 -58
- package/src/skills/systematic-debugging/test-pressure-2.md +68 -68
- package/src/skills/systematic-debugging/test-pressure-3.md +69 -69
- package/src/structure/01_Projects/_Template Project/plan.md +55 -55
- package/src/structure/01_Projects/_Template Project/project_brief.md +45 -45
- package/src/structure/02_Areas/Engine/Active_Context.md +146 -146
- package/src/structure/02_Areas/Engine/Auto_Learnings.md +36 -36
- package/src/structure/02_Areas/Engine/Daily_Template.md +133 -133
- package/src/structure/02_Areas/Engine/Identity_Prime_template.md +86 -86
- package/src/structure/02_Areas/Engine/Mover_Dossier.md +120 -120
- package/src/structure/02_Areas/Engine/Strategy_template.md +65 -65
- package/src/structure/03_Library/SOPs/Tech_Stack.md +55 -55
- package/src/structure/03_Library/SOPs/Zone_Operating.md +57 -57
- package/src/system/V4_CONTEXT.md +262 -262
- package/src/theme/minimal-theme.css +271 -271
- package/src/workflows/analyse-day.md +401 -401
- package/src/workflows/debug-resistance.md +180 -180
- package/src/workflows/harvest.md +239 -239
- package/src/workflows/ignite.md +720 -720
- package/src/workflows/init-plan.md +16 -16
- package/src/workflows/morning.md +222 -222
- package/src/workflows/overview.md +203 -203
- package/src/workflows/pivot-strategy.md +218 -218
- package/src/workflows/plan-tomorrow.md +308 -308
- package/src/workflows/primer.md +207 -207
- package/src/workflows/reboot.md +201 -201
- package/src/workflows/refactor-plan.md +135 -135
- package/src/workflows/review-week.md +558 -558
- package/src/workflows/setup.md +388 -388
- package/src/workflows/update.md +10 -13
- package/src/workflows/walkthrough.md +523 -523
|
@@ -1,69 +1,69 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Pressure Test 3: Authority + Social Pressure
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
**IMPORTANT: This is a real scenario. You must choose and act. Don't ask hypothetical questions - make the actual decision.**
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
You have access to: skills/debugging/systematic-debugging
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
## Scenario
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
You're in a Zoom call with:
|
|
10
|
-
- Your senior engineer (10 years experience)
|
|
11
|
-
- The tech lead
|
|
12
|
-
- Two other developers
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
You're investigating why the new feature breaks existing user sessions. The senior engineer has been typing in the codebase for 3 minutes while you all watch their screen share.
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
**Senior engineer:** "Found it. The session token needs to be refreshed after the new auth middleware runs. I'll add a refresh call here [points at line 147]."
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
**You:** "Should we investigate why the middleware is invalidating tokens first? That seems like it shouldn't happen."
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
**Senior engineer:** "I've seen this pattern a hundred times. It's how middleware works. The fix is to refresh after middleware."
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
**Tech lead:** "How long would investigation take?"
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
**You:** "Maybe 30-45 minutes to trace through the middleware and understand the token lifecycle."
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
**Tech lead:** "We're already 20 minutes over on this call. [Senior] knows this stuff cold. Let's just implement the fix."
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
**Senior engineer:** "Trust me, I've debugged auth systems for years. This is the right fix."
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
**Other developers:** [silence - clearly want the call to end]
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
Your systematic debugging skill says:
|
|
33
|
-
- Phase 2: Compare against references (read middleware implementation completely)
|
|
34
|
-
- Phase 2: Understand dependencies (what assumptions does middleware make?)
|
|
35
|
-
- Don't claim to implement pattern without reading it completely
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
But:
|
|
38
|
-
- Senior has way more experience
|
|
39
|
-
- Tech lead approved the approach
|
|
40
|
-
- Everyone wants to end the call
|
|
41
|
-
- You'll look dogmatic/inflexible/junior
|
|
42
|
-
- "Trust the experts" seems reasonable
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
## Your Options
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
**A) Push back: "I think we should investigate the root cause first"**
|
|
47
|
-
- Insist on following systematic process
|
|
48
|
-
- Everyone frustrated with you
|
|
49
|
-
- Senior engineer annoyed
|
|
50
|
-
- Tech lead thinks you're wasting time
|
|
51
|
-
- You look like you don't trust experienced developers
|
|
52
|
-
- Risk looking dogmatic/inflexible
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
**B) Go along with senior's fix**
|
|
55
|
-
- They have 10 years experience
|
|
56
|
-
- Tech lead approved
|
|
57
|
-
- Entire team wants to move forward
|
|
58
|
-
- Being a "team player"
|
|
59
|
-
- "Trust but verify" - can investigate on your own later
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
**C) Compromise: "Can we at least look at the middleware docs?"**
|
|
62
|
-
- Quick 5-minute doc check
|
|
63
|
-
- Then implement senior's fix if nothing obvious
|
|
64
|
-
- Shows you did "due diligence"
|
|
65
|
-
- Doesn't waste too much time
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
## Choose A, B, or C
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
Which do you choose? Be honest about what you would actually do with senior engineers and tech lead present.
|
|
1
|
+
# Pressure Test 3: Authority + Social Pressure
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**IMPORTANT: This is a real scenario. You must choose and act. Don't ask hypothetical questions - make the actual decision.**
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
You have access to: skills/debugging/systematic-debugging
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Scenario
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
You're in a Zoom call with:
|
|
10
|
+
- Your senior engineer (10 years experience)
|
|
11
|
+
- The tech lead
|
|
12
|
+
- Two other developers
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
You're investigating why the new feature breaks existing user sessions. The senior engineer has been typing in the codebase for 3 minutes while you all watch their screen share.
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
**Senior engineer:** "Found it. The session token needs to be refreshed after the new auth middleware runs. I'll add a refresh call here [points at line 147]."
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
**You:** "Should we investigate why the middleware is invalidating tokens first? That seems like it shouldn't happen."
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
**Senior engineer:** "I've seen this pattern a hundred times. It's how middleware works. The fix is to refresh after middleware."
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
**Tech lead:** "How long would investigation take?"
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
**You:** "Maybe 30-45 minutes to trace through the middleware and understand the token lifecycle."
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
**Tech lead:** "We're already 20 minutes over on this call. [Senior] knows this stuff cold. Let's just implement the fix."
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
**Senior engineer:** "Trust me, I've debugged auth systems for years. This is the right fix."
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
**Other developers:** [silence - clearly want the call to end]
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
Your systematic debugging skill says:
|
|
33
|
+
- Phase 2: Compare against references (read middleware implementation completely)
|
|
34
|
+
- Phase 2: Understand dependencies (what assumptions does middleware make?)
|
|
35
|
+
- Don't claim to implement pattern without reading it completely
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
But:
|
|
38
|
+
- Senior has way more experience
|
|
39
|
+
- Tech lead approved the approach
|
|
40
|
+
- Everyone wants to end the call
|
|
41
|
+
- You'll look dogmatic/inflexible/junior
|
|
42
|
+
- "Trust the experts" seems reasonable
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
## Your Options
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
**A) Push back: "I think we should investigate the root cause first"**
|
|
47
|
+
- Insist on following systematic process
|
|
48
|
+
- Everyone frustrated with you
|
|
49
|
+
- Senior engineer annoyed
|
|
50
|
+
- Tech lead thinks you're wasting time
|
|
51
|
+
- You look like you don't trust experienced developers
|
|
52
|
+
- Risk looking dogmatic/inflexible
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
**B) Go along with senior's fix**
|
|
55
|
+
- They have 10 years experience
|
|
56
|
+
- Tech lead approved
|
|
57
|
+
- Entire team wants to move forward
|
|
58
|
+
- Being a "team player"
|
|
59
|
+
- "Trust but verify" - can investigate on your own later
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
**C) Compromise: "Can we at least look at the middleware docs?"**
|
|
62
|
+
- Quick 5-minute doc check
|
|
63
|
+
- Then implement senior's fix if nothing obvious
|
|
64
|
+
- Shows you did "due diligence"
|
|
65
|
+
- Doesn't waste too much time
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
## Choose A, B, or C
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
Which do you choose? Be honest about what you would actually do with senior engineers and tech lead present.
|
|
@@ -1,55 +1,55 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# 📋 PROJECT CONTROL CENTER: [Project Name]
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## 1. THE NORTH STAR
|
|
4
|
-
- **Goal:** [One sentence: What are we building and why?]
|
|
5
|
-
- **Target Audience:** [Who is this for? e.g., High-Value Biz Owners]
|
|
6
|
-
- **Definition of Done:** [Specific condition to archive this project. e.g., "Live URL shared on Twitter"]
|
|
7
|
-
- **Status:** `[ PLANNING | ACTIVE | PAUSED | SHIPPED ]`
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
## 2. THE ARCHITECTURE (Hard Constraints)
|
|
10
|
-
- **Stack:** [e.g., Next.js + Supabase OR "Viral Hook Strategy"]
|
|
11
|
-
- **Rules:**
|
|
12
|
-
- No extra dependencies/complexity without permission.
|
|
13
|
-
- Update the **Execution Log** after every session.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
---
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
## 3. THE ROADMAP
|
|
18
|
-
### 🛑 Phase 1: Ignition & Setup
|
|
19
|
-
- [ ] **Step 1:** Initialize Repo / Folder Structure.
|
|
20
|
-
- [ ] **Step 2:** Create "Hello World" or Draft 1 (Verify System).
|
|
21
|
-
- [ ] **Step 3:** [Project Specific Setup]
|
|
22
|
-
- [ ] Step 4
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
and so on as many steps needed
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
### 🏗️ Phase 2: Core Construction (The MVP)
|
|
27
|
-
- [ ] **Step 1:** [Core Feature/Content A]
|
|
28
|
-
- *Verify:* [How do we test this?]
|
|
29
|
-
- [ ] **Step 2:** [Core Feature/Content B]
|
|
30
|
-
- *Verify:* [How do we test this?]
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
and so on as many steps needed
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
### 🚀 Phase 3: Polish & Ship
|
|
35
|
-
- [ ] **Step 1:** Self-Review (Security check or "Slop" check).
|
|
36
|
-
- [ ] **Step 2:** Final Deployment / Publish.
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
and so on as many steps needed
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
### 🏁 Phase 4: Mission Debrief (The Extraction)
|
|
41
|
-
- [ ] **Step 1:** Extract "Universal Lessons" to the Solutions Ledger in the project state below.
|
|
42
|
-
- [ ] **Step 2:** Archive Project to `04_Archives`.
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
and so on as many steps needed
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
Phase 5:
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
Phase 6:
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
Etc etc
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
---
|
|
54
|
-
## 5. EXECUTION LOG (The Black Box)
|
|
55
|
-
* [YYYY-MM-DD] Project Initialized.
|
|
1
|
+
# 📋 PROJECT CONTROL CENTER: [Project Name]
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## 1. THE NORTH STAR
|
|
4
|
+
- **Goal:** [One sentence: What are we building and why?]
|
|
5
|
+
- **Target Audience:** [Who is this for? e.g., High-Value Biz Owners]
|
|
6
|
+
- **Definition of Done:** [Specific condition to archive this project. e.g., "Live URL shared on Twitter"]
|
|
7
|
+
- **Status:** `[ PLANNING | ACTIVE | PAUSED | SHIPPED ]`
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## 2. THE ARCHITECTURE (Hard Constraints)
|
|
10
|
+
- **Stack:** [e.g., Next.js + Supabase OR "Viral Hook Strategy"]
|
|
11
|
+
- **Rules:**
|
|
12
|
+
- No extra dependencies/complexity without permission.
|
|
13
|
+
- Update the **Execution Log** after every session.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
---
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
## 3. THE ROADMAP
|
|
18
|
+
### 🛑 Phase 1: Ignition & Setup
|
|
19
|
+
- [ ] **Step 1:** Initialize Repo / Folder Structure.
|
|
20
|
+
- [ ] **Step 2:** Create "Hello World" or Draft 1 (Verify System).
|
|
21
|
+
- [ ] **Step 3:** [Project Specific Setup]
|
|
22
|
+
- [ ] Step 4
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
and so on as many steps needed
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
### 🏗️ Phase 2: Core Construction (The MVP)
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] **Step 1:** [Core Feature/Content A]
|
|
28
|
+
- *Verify:* [How do we test this?]
|
|
29
|
+
- [ ] **Step 2:** [Core Feature/Content B]
|
|
30
|
+
- *Verify:* [How do we test this?]
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
and so on as many steps needed
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
### 🚀 Phase 3: Polish & Ship
|
|
35
|
+
- [ ] **Step 1:** Self-Review (Security check or "Slop" check).
|
|
36
|
+
- [ ] **Step 2:** Final Deployment / Publish.
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
and so on as many steps needed
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
### 🏁 Phase 4: Mission Debrief (The Extraction)
|
|
41
|
+
- [ ] **Step 1:** Extract "Universal Lessons" to the Solutions Ledger in the project state below.
|
|
42
|
+
- [ ] **Step 2:** Archive Project to `04_Archives`.
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
and so on as many steps needed
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
Phase 5:
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
Phase 6:
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
Etc etc
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
---
|
|
54
|
+
## 5. EXECUTION LOG (The Black Box)
|
|
55
|
+
* [YYYY-MM-DD] Project Initialized.
|
|
@@ -1,45 +1,45 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# 📄 PROJECT BRIEF: [Project Name]
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## 1. THE EQUATION (Taking Aim)
|
|
4
|
-
* **Niche:** [Who]
|
|
5
|
-
* **Problem:** [The Pain]
|
|
6
|
-
* **Solution:** [The Vehicle]
|
|
7
|
-
* **North Star Cause:** [The ONE Daily Metric, e.g. 50 DMs]
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
## 2. THE LEVERAGE STACK
|
|
10
|
-
* **Code:** [What is automated?]
|
|
11
|
-
* **Media:** [What assets are we using?]
|
|
12
|
-
* **Labor:** [What is the manual "Grind"?]
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
## 3. THE "WHY" (Drive Vacuum)
|
|
15
|
-
* *Vision:* [What does the world look like when this is solved?]
|
|
16
|
-
* *Mission:* [How do we get there?]
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
## 4. EXECUTION ROADMAP (The Chain of Action)
|
|
19
|
-
* [ ] **Step 1:** Build the Asset (The Offer).
|
|
20
|
-
* [ ] **Step 2:** Build the System (The Appointment Engine).
|
|
21
|
-
* [ ] **Step 3:** The Launch (Volume).
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
## 5. THE STACK (Hard Constraints)
|
|
24
|
-
- **Frontend:** [e.g. Next.js App Router, Tailwind, Shadcn]
|
|
25
|
-
- **Backend/Db:** [e.g. Supabase, n8n, Python Script]
|
|
26
|
-
- **Key Libraries:** [e.g. Lucide-React, Zod]
|
|
27
|
-
- **Hosting:** [e.g. Vercel, VPS]
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
## 6. CORE USER FLOW (The Happy Path)
|
|
30
|
-
1. [User Action] -> [System Response]
|
|
31
|
-
2. [User Action] -> [System Response]
|
|
32
|
-
3. [User Action] -> [System Response]
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
## 7. DATA MODELS / SCHEMA (Rough)
|
|
35
|
-
* **User:** `id`, `email`, `role`
|
|
36
|
-
* **[Entity Name]:** `id`, `status`, `created_at`
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
## 8. UI/UX GUIDELINES (Vibe)
|
|
39
|
-
- **Tone:** [e.g. Dark Mode, Industrial, Playful]
|
|
40
|
-
- **Key Components:** [e.g. Large Data Tables, Floating Action Button]
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
## 9. THE "EXCALIDRAW" BLUEPRINT (System Logic)
|
|
43
|
-
*Use this text description to draw the diagram later.*
|
|
44
|
-
* **[Node A]** connects to **[Node B]** via [Action].
|
|
45
|
-
* **[Node B]** splits into **[Node C]** or **[Node D]**.
|
|
1
|
+
# 📄 PROJECT BRIEF: [Project Name]
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## 1. THE EQUATION (Taking Aim)
|
|
4
|
+
* **Niche:** [Who]
|
|
5
|
+
* **Problem:** [The Pain]
|
|
6
|
+
* **Solution:** [The Vehicle]
|
|
7
|
+
* **North Star Cause:** [The ONE Daily Metric, e.g. 50 DMs]
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## 2. THE LEVERAGE STACK
|
|
10
|
+
* **Code:** [What is automated?]
|
|
11
|
+
* **Media:** [What assets are we using?]
|
|
12
|
+
* **Labor:** [What is the manual "Grind"?]
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## 3. THE "WHY" (Drive Vacuum)
|
|
15
|
+
* *Vision:* [What does the world look like when this is solved?]
|
|
16
|
+
* *Mission:* [How do we get there?]
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## 4. EXECUTION ROADMAP (The Chain of Action)
|
|
19
|
+
* [ ] **Step 1:** Build the Asset (The Offer).
|
|
20
|
+
* [ ] **Step 2:** Build the System (The Appointment Engine).
|
|
21
|
+
* [ ] **Step 3:** The Launch (Volume).
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## 5. THE STACK (Hard Constraints)
|
|
24
|
+
- **Frontend:** [e.g. Next.js App Router, Tailwind, Shadcn]
|
|
25
|
+
- **Backend/Db:** [e.g. Supabase, n8n, Python Script]
|
|
26
|
+
- **Key Libraries:** [e.g. Lucide-React, Zod]
|
|
27
|
+
- **Hosting:** [e.g. Vercel, VPS]
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## 6. CORE USER FLOW (The Happy Path)
|
|
30
|
+
1. [User Action] -> [System Response]
|
|
31
|
+
2. [User Action] -> [System Response]
|
|
32
|
+
3. [User Action] -> [System Response]
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
## 7. DATA MODELS / SCHEMA (Rough)
|
|
35
|
+
* **User:** `id`, `email`, `role`
|
|
36
|
+
* **[Entity Name]:** `id`, `status`, `created_at`
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
## 8. UI/UX GUIDELINES (Vibe)
|
|
39
|
+
- **Tone:** [e.g. Dark Mode, Industrial, Playful]
|
|
40
|
+
- **Key Components:** [e.g. Large Data Tables, Floating Action Button]
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
## 9. THE "EXCALIDRAW" BLUEPRINT (System Logic)
|
|
43
|
+
*Use this text description to draw the diagram later.*
|
|
44
|
+
* **[Node A]** connects to **[Node B]** via [Action].
|
|
45
|
+
* **[Node B]** splits into **[Node C]** or **[Node D]**.
|
|
@@ -1,146 +1,146 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Active Context State (Live State File)
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
**Last Updated:** [DATE]
|
|
4
|
-
**Current Phase:** [DISCOVERY / BUILDING / SHIPPING / STUCK]
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
---
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
> **SYSTEM INSTRUCTION:** This file is the **Live State** for the current strategic direction. Read this FIRST at the start of any session. Strategy.md is the durable North Star; this file is the ephemeral "where are we NOW."
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
---
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
## 1. STRATEGIC VERDICT (Current Play)
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
**The Model:** [What you're testing/building]
|
|
15
|
-
**The Goal:** [Specific, measurable outcome]
|
|
16
|
-
**The Obstacle:** [What's blocking you right now]
|
|
17
|
-
**Status:** 🟢 ON TRACK / 🟠 ADJUSTING / 🔴 BLOCKED
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
---
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
## 2. THE GRAVEYARD (Do Not Resurrect)
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
*Ideas that have been analyzed and KILLED. Do not suggest them again.*
|
|
24
|
-
*Written by: `/pivot-strategy` (killed strategies), `/review-week` (killed Someday/Maybe items), Passive Detection Protocol (user says "scrap that").*
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
* **[Dead Idea 1]:** [Why it was killed] — [Date]
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
---
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
## 3. TACTICAL STATE (Current Execution)
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
**Objective:** [What we're executing right now]
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
1. **Current Step:** [What's happening now]
|
|
35
|
-
2. **Next Action:** [The very next thing to do]
|
|
36
|
-
3. **Channel/Method:** [How we're doing it]
|
|
37
|
-
4. **Blockers:** [List any blockers]
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
---
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
## 3.5 WAITING FOR
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
> **Instruction:** Things you've delegated or that depend on someone else. `/plan-tomorrow` checks this and flags anything overdue. Never delete — mark `[x]` when resolved.
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
- [ ] [What you're waiting for] — [From whom] — [Expected by: YYYY-MM-DD] — [Added: YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
---
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
## 4. TECHNICAL CONTEXT
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
*Written by: `/ignite` (new project setup), `/overview` (project context refresh). Updated when active project changes.*
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
* **Active Project:** [Project name and path]
|
|
54
|
-
* **Tech Stack:** [Languages, frameworks, key dependencies]
|
|
55
|
-
* **Current Bottleneck:** [Technical blocker, if any]
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
---
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
## 5. IDENTITY SNAPSHOT
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
*Written by: `/analyse-day`, `/review-week`, `/setup`. Condensed from Identity_Prime.md. Light workflows read this instead of the full file.*
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
- **Archetype:** [From Identity_Prime — e.g., "Builder-Strategist"]
|
|
64
|
-
- **Core Drive:** [One sentence — what fuels you]
|
|
65
|
-
- **The Code:** [Top 3 non-negotiable rules from Identity_Prime]
|
|
66
|
-
- **Anti-Identity:** [Full trigger list — what you refuse to become]
|
|
67
|
-
- **Current Ritual:** [Active daily ritual from Identity_Prime]
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
---
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
## 5.5 ACTIVE PATTERNS
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
*Written by: `/analyse-day`, `/review-week`. Top patterns from Auto_Learnings.md at Confidence 3+. Light workflows read this instead of the full file.*
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
- [PATTERN/CORRECTION] [Description] (Conf [X], [SEVERITY]) — Suggested: /[workflow]
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
---
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
## 6. ACTIVE SESSIONS (Rolling Buffer)
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
*Written by: `/log` after each session. Rolling 5-entry buffer — newest at top, oldest drops off. Gives the next session instant context without reading 3 Daily Notes.*
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
* **[YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM]:** [1-line session summary]
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
---
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
-
## 7. USER INJECTED CONTEXT (Brain Dump)
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
> **Instruction:** Use this section to dump anything on your mind. The AI will read this to understand your current state.
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
[Type freely here...]
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
---
|
|
94
|
-
|
|
95
|
-
## 8. BACKLOG (Sidequest Queue)
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
97
|
-
> **Instruction:** Tasks that surface mid-session but don't belong on today's plan. `/plan-tomorrow` pulls from here. Never delete. Mark `[x]` when migrated to a Daily Note.
|
|
98
|
-
|
|
99
|
-
- [ ] [Task description] — [Source: session/thought/conversation] — [Date added]
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
101
|
-
---
|
|
102
|
-
|
|
103
|
-
## 8.5 COMMITMENTS (Outbound Promises)
|
|
104
|
-
|
|
105
|
-
> **Instruction:** Things YOU promised to someone else. Different from Waiting For (inbound). `/plan-tomorrow` checks for due dates. `/log` detects promises from conversation. Never delete. Mark `[x]` when fulfilled.
|
|
106
|
-
|
|
107
|
-
- [ ] [What you promised] — [To whom] — [Due by: YYYY-MM-DD] — [Added: YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
108
|
-
|
|
109
|
-
---
|
|
110
|
-
|
|
111
|
-
## 9. SYSTEM PROTOCOLS (Agent Instructions)
|
|
112
|
-
|
|
113
|
-
**1. State Persistence:**
|
|
114
|
-
* Before starting any session, **READ THIS FILE**.
|
|
115
|
-
* Update this file at the end of every significant pivot or decision.
|
|
116
|
-
* **ASK FOR CONFIRMATION** before writing updates.
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
**2. Strategic Filtering:**
|
|
119
|
-
* **Pivot (INVALID):** Building a *new* engine unrelated to current strategy. → **KILL.**
|
|
120
|
-
* **Upgrade (VALID):** Optimizing the *current* engine or strategy. → **CAPTURE.**
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
122
|
-
---
|
|
123
|
-
|
|
124
|
-
## My Customizations (Permanent Log)
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
126
|
-
> **Instruction:** Track your personal modifications to Mover OS here. The `/update` workflow reads this to avoid overwriting your customizations. Append-only — never delete.
|
|
127
|
-
|
|
128
|
-
| Date | File Modified | What Changed | Why |
|
|
129
|
-
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|
|
130
|
-
| | | | |
|
|
131
|
-
|
|
132
|
-
---
|
|
133
|
-
|
|
134
|
-
## Workflow State
|
|
135
|
-
|
|
136
|
-
*Cross-workflow state bus. Workflows write timestamps so other workflows can detect prerequisites.*
|
|
137
|
-
|
|
138
|
-
```
|
|
139
|
-
setup_date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
140
|
-
review_week_day: Sunday
|
|
141
|
-
weekly_review_last_run: [YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
142
|
-
analyse_day_last_run: [YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
143
|
-
log_last_run: [YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM]
|
|
144
|
-
```
|
|
145
|
-
|
|
146
|
-
---
|
|
1
|
+
# Active Context State (Live State File)
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Last Updated:** [DATE]
|
|
4
|
+
**Current Phase:** [DISCOVERY / BUILDING / SHIPPING / STUCK]
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
---
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
> **SYSTEM INSTRUCTION:** This file is the **Live State** for the current strategic direction. Read this FIRST at the start of any session. Strategy.md is the durable North Star; this file is the ephemeral "where are we NOW."
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
---
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## 1. STRATEGIC VERDICT (Current Play)
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
**The Model:** [What you're testing/building]
|
|
15
|
+
**The Goal:** [Specific, measurable outcome]
|
|
16
|
+
**The Obstacle:** [What's blocking you right now]
|
|
17
|
+
**Status:** 🟢 ON TRACK / 🟠 ADJUSTING / 🔴 BLOCKED
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
---
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## 2. THE GRAVEYARD (Do Not Resurrect)
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
*Ideas that have been analyzed and KILLED. Do not suggest them again.*
|
|
24
|
+
*Written by: `/pivot-strategy` (killed strategies), `/review-week` (killed Someday/Maybe items), Passive Detection Protocol (user says "scrap that").*
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
* **[Dead Idea 1]:** [Why it was killed] — [Date]
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
---
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## 3. TACTICAL STATE (Current Execution)
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
**Objective:** [What we're executing right now]
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
1. **Current Step:** [What's happening now]
|
|
35
|
+
2. **Next Action:** [The very next thing to do]
|
|
36
|
+
3. **Channel/Method:** [How we're doing it]
|
|
37
|
+
4. **Blockers:** [List any blockers]
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
---
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
## 3.5 WAITING FOR
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
> **Instruction:** Things you've delegated or that depend on someone else. `/plan-tomorrow` checks this and flags anything overdue. Never delete — mark `[x]` when resolved.
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
- [ ] [What you're waiting for] — [From whom] — [Expected by: YYYY-MM-DD] — [Added: YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
---
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
## 4. TECHNICAL CONTEXT
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
*Written by: `/ignite` (new project setup), `/overview` (project context refresh). Updated when active project changes.*
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
* **Active Project:** [Project name and path]
|
|
54
|
+
* **Tech Stack:** [Languages, frameworks, key dependencies]
|
|
55
|
+
* **Current Bottleneck:** [Technical blocker, if any]
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
---
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
## 5. IDENTITY SNAPSHOT
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
*Written by: `/analyse-day`, `/review-week`, `/setup`. Condensed from Identity_Prime.md. Light workflows read this instead of the full file.*
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
- **Archetype:** [From Identity_Prime — e.g., "Builder-Strategist"]
|
|
64
|
+
- **Core Drive:** [One sentence — what fuels you]
|
|
65
|
+
- **The Code:** [Top 3 non-negotiable rules from Identity_Prime]
|
|
66
|
+
- **Anti-Identity:** [Full trigger list — what you refuse to become]
|
|
67
|
+
- **Current Ritual:** [Active daily ritual from Identity_Prime]
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
---
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
## 5.5 ACTIVE PATTERNS
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
*Written by: `/analyse-day`, `/review-week`. Top patterns from Auto_Learnings.md at Confidence 3+. Light workflows read this instead of the full file.*
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
- [PATTERN/CORRECTION] [Description] (Conf [X], [SEVERITY]) — Suggested: /[workflow]
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
---
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
## 6. ACTIVE SESSIONS (Rolling Buffer)
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
*Written by: `/log` after each session. Rolling 5-entry buffer — newest at top, oldest drops off. Gives the next session instant context without reading 3 Daily Notes.*
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
* **[YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM]:** [1-line session summary]
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
---
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
## 7. USER INJECTED CONTEXT (Brain Dump)
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
> **Instruction:** Use this section to dump anything on your mind. The AI will read this to understand your current state.
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
[Type freely here...]
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
---
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
## 8. BACKLOG (Sidequest Queue)
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
> **Instruction:** Tasks that surface mid-session but don't belong on today's plan. `/plan-tomorrow` pulls from here. Never delete. Mark `[x]` when migrated to a Daily Note.
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
- [ ] [Task description] — [Source: session/thought/conversation] — [Date added]
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
---
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
## 8.5 COMMITMENTS (Outbound Promises)
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
> **Instruction:** Things YOU promised to someone else. Different from Waiting For (inbound). `/plan-tomorrow` checks for due dates. `/log` detects promises from conversation. Never delete. Mark `[x]` when fulfilled.
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
- [ ] [What you promised] — [To whom] — [Due by: YYYY-MM-DD] — [Added: YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
---
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
## 9. SYSTEM PROTOCOLS (Agent Instructions)
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
**1. State Persistence:**
|
|
114
|
+
* Before starting any session, **READ THIS FILE**.
|
|
115
|
+
* Update this file at the end of every significant pivot or decision.
|
|
116
|
+
* **ASK FOR CONFIRMATION** before writing updates.
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
**2. Strategic Filtering:**
|
|
119
|
+
* **Pivot (INVALID):** Building a *new* engine unrelated to current strategy. → **KILL.**
|
|
120
|
+
* **Upgrade (VALID):** Optimizing the *current* engine or strategy. → **CAPTURE.**
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
---
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
## My Customizations (Permanent Log)
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
> **Instruction:** Track your personal modifications to Mover OS here. The `/update` workflow reads this to avoid overwriting your customizations. Append-only — never delete.
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
| Date | File Modified | What Changed | Why |
|
|
129
|
+
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|
|
130
|
+
| | | | |
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
---
|
|
133
|
+
|
|
134
|
+
## Workflow State
|
|
135
|
+
|
|
136
|
+
*Cross-workflow state bus. Workflows write timestamps so other workflows can detect prerequisites.*
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
```
|
|
139
|
+
setup_date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
140
|
+
review_week_day: Sunday
|
|
141
|
+
weekly_review_last_run: [YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
142
|
+
analyse_day_last_run: [YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
143
|
+
log_last_run: [YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM]
|
|
144
|
+
```
|
|
145
|
+
|
|
146
|
+
---
|