agileflow 3.3.0 → 3.4.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +5 -0
- package/README.md +6 -6
- package/lib/skill-loader.js +0 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/scripts/agileflow-statusline.sh +81 -0
- package/scripts/claude-tmux.sh +113 -22
- package/scripts/claude-watchdog.sh +225 -0
- package/scripts/generators/agent-registry.js +14 -1
- package/scripts/generators/inject-babysit.js +22 -9
- package/scripts/generators/inject-help.js +19 -9
- package/scripts/lib/audit-cleanup.js +250 -0
- package/scripts/lib/audit-registry.js +248 -0
- package/scripts/lib/feature-catalog.js +3 -3
- package/scripts/lib/gate-enforcer.js +295 -0
- package/scripts/lib/model-profiles.js +98 -0
- package/scripts/lib/signal-detectors.js +1 -1
- package/scripts/lib/skill-catalog.js +557 -0
- package/scripts/lib/skill-recommender.js +311 -0
- package/scripts/lib/tdd-phase-manager.js +455 -0
- package/scripts/lib/team-events.js +34 -3
- package/scripts/lib/tmux-group-colors.js +113 -0
- package/scripts/messaging-bridge.js +209 -1
- package/scripts/spawn-audit-sessions.js +549 -0
- package/scripts/team-manager.js +37 -16
- package/scripts/tmux-close-windows.sh +180 -0
- package/src/core/agents/ads-audit-budget.md +181 -0
- package/src/core/agents/ads-audit-compliance.md +169 -0
- package/src/core/agents/ads-audit-creative.md +164 -0
- package/src/core/agents/ads-audit-google.md +226 -0
- package/src/core/agents/ads-audit-meta.md +183 -0
- package/src/core/agents/ads-audit-tracking.md +197 -0
- package/src/core/agents/ads-consensus.md +322 -0
- package/src/core/agents/brainstorm-analyzer-features.md +169 -0
- package/src/core/agents/brainstorm-analyzer-growth.md +161 -0
- package/src/core/agents/brainstorm-analyzer-integration.md +172 -0
- package/src/core/agents/brainstorm-analyzer-market.md +147 -0
- package/src/core/agents/brainstorm-analyzer-ux.md +167 -0
- package/src/core/agents/brainstorm-consensus.md +237 -0
- package/src/core/agents/completeness-consensus.md +5 -5
- package/src/core/agents/perf-consensus.md +2 -2
- package/src/core/agents/security-consensus.md +2 -2
- package/src/core/agents/seo-analyzer-content.md +167 -0
- package/src/core/agents/seo-analyzer-images.md +187 -0
- package/src/core/agents/seo-analyzer-performance.md +206 -0
- package/src/core/agents/seo-analyzer-schema.md +176 -0
- package/src/core/agents/seo-analyzer-sitemap.md +172 -0
- package/src/core/agents/seo-analyzer-technical.md +144 -0
- package/src/core/agents/seo-consensus.md +289 -0
- package/src/core/agents/test-consensus.md +2 -2
- package/src/core/commands/ads/audit.md +375 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ads/budget.md +97 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ads/competitor.md +112 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ads/creative.md +85 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ads/google.md +112 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ads/landing.md +119 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ads/linkedin.md +112 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ads/meta.md +91 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ads/microsoft.md +115 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ads/plan.md +321 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ads/tiktok.md +129 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ads/youtube.md +124 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ads.md +128 -0
- package/src/core/commands/babysit.md +249 -1284
- package/src/core/commands/{audit → code}/completeness.md +35 -25
- package/src/core/commands/{audit → code}/legal.md +26 -16
- package/src/core/commands/{audit → code}/logic.md +27 -16
- package/src/core/commands/{audit → code}/performance.md +30 -20
- package/src/core/commands/{audit → code}/security.md +32 -19
- package/src/core/commands/{audit → code}/test.md +30 -20
- package/src/core/commands/{discovery → ideate}/brief.md +12 -12
- package/src/core/commands/{discovery/new.md → ideate/discover.md} +13 -13
- package/src/core/commands/ideate/features.md +435 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/audit.md +373 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/competitor.md +174 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/content.md +107 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/geo.md +229 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/hreflang.md +140 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/images.md +96 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/page.md +198 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/plan.md +163 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/programmatic.md +131 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/references/cwv-thresholds.md +64 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/references/eeat-framework.md +110 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/references/quality-gates.md +91 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/references/schema-types.md +102 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/schema.md +183 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/sitemap.md +97 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo/technical.md +100 -0
- package/src/core/commands/seo.md +107 -0
- package/src/core/commands/skill/list.md +68 -212
- package/src/core/commands/skill/recommend.md +216 -0
- package/src/core/commands/tdd-next.md +238 -0
- package/src/core/commands/tdd.md +210 -0
- package/src/core/experts/_core-expertise.yaml +105 -0
- package/src/core/experts/analytics/expertise.yaml +5 -99
- package/src/core/experts/codebase-query/expertise.yaml +3 -72
- package/src/core/experts/compliance/expertise.yaml +6 -72
- package/src/core/experts/database/expertise.yaml +9 -52
- package/src/core/experts/documentation/expertise.yaml +7 -140
- package/src/core/experts/integrations/expertise.yaml +7 -127
- package/src/core/experts/mentor/expertise.yaml +8 -35
- package/src/core/experts/monitoring/expertise.yaml +7 -49
- package/src/core/experts/performance/expertise.yaml +1 -26
- package/src/core/experts/security/expertise.yaml +9 -34
- package/src/core/experts/ui/expertise.yaml +6 -36
- package/src/core/knowledge/ads/ad-audit-checklist-scoring.md +424 -0
- package/src/core/knowledge/ads/ad-optimization-logic.md +590 -0
- package/src/core/knowledge/ads/ad-technical-specifications.md +385 -0
- package/src/core/knowledge/ads/definitive-advertising-reference-2026.md +506 -0
- package/src/core/knowledge/ads/paid-advertising-research-2026.md +445 -0
- package/src/core/templates/agileflow-metadata.json +15 -1
- package/tools/cli/installers/ide/_base-ide.js +42 -5
- package/tools/cli/installers/ide/claude-code.js +3 -3
- package/tools/cli/lib/content-injector.js +160 -12
- package/tools/cli/lib/docs-setup.js +1 -1
- package/src/core/commands/skill/create.md +0 -698
- package/src/core/commands/skill/delete.md +0 -316
- package/src/core/commands/skill/edit.md +0 -359
- package/src/core/commands/skill/test.md +0 -394
- package/src/core/commands/skill/upgrade.md +0 -552
- package/src/core/templates/skill-template.md +0 -117
|
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Budget allocation and bidding strategy optimizer with industry benchmarks, platform minimums, scaling rules, and reallocation recommendations
|
|
3
|
+
argument-hint: "<account-data>"
|
|
4
|
+
compact_context:
|
|
5
|
+
priority: medium
|
|
6
|
+
preserve_rules:
|
|
7
|
+
- "ACTIVE COMMAND: /agileflow:ads:budget - Budget & bidding strategy"
|
|
8
|
+
- "Delegate to ads-audit-budget agent for 24 checks"
|
|
9
|
+
- "Include platform minimums and scaling rules"
|
|
10
|
+
state_fields:
|
|
11
|
+
- budget_score
|
|
12
|
+
- total_spend
|
|
13
|
+
---
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
# /agileflow:ads:budget
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
Run a budget allocation and bidding strategy audit using the `ads-audit-budget` agent with 24 checks, including industry benchmarks and specific reallocation recommendations.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
---
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Quick Reference
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
```
|
|
24
|
+
/agileflow:ads:budget <account-data> # Full budget audit
|
|
25
|
+
```
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
---
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Process
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
### STEP 1: Validate Input
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
If no data provided, ask for:
|
|
34
|
+
- Monthly spend per platform
|
|
35
|
+
- Campaign-level budgets and performance
|
|
36
|
+
- Bid strategies in use
|
|
37
|
+
- Conversion data (volume, CPA, ROAS)
|
|
38
|
+
- Industry and target metrics
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
### STEP 2: Deploy Budget Analyzer
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
```xml
|
|
43
|
+
<invoke name="Task">
|
|
44
|
+
<parameter name="description">Budget and bidding audit</parameter>
|
|
45
|
+
<parameter name="prompt">TASK: Audit budget allocation and bidding strategy.
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
ACCOUNT DATA:
|
|
48
|
+
{budget_data}
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
Apply ALL 24 checks across 4 categories:
|
|
51
|
+
- Budget Allocation (35%) - 8 checks
|
|
52
|
+
- Bidding Strategy (30%) - 8 checks
|
|
53
|
+
- Scaling & Pacing (20%) - 4 checks
|
|
54
|
+
- Platform Mix (15%) - 4 checks
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
Enforce platform minimums, scaling rules, and 3x Kill Rule.
|
|
57
|
+
Include specific dollar reallocation recommendations.
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
OUTPUT: Full findings with Budget Score X/100</parameter>
|
|
60
|
+
<parameter name="subagent_type">ads-audit-budget</parameter>
|
|
61
|
+
</invoke>
|
|
62
|
+
```
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
### STEP 3: Present Results
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
Show Budget Score with specific reallocation recommendations.
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
---
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## Platform Minimums
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
| Platform | Campaign Minimum | Ad Set/Group Minimum |
|
|
73
|
+
|----------|-----------------|---------------------|
|
|
74
|
+
| Google Ads | $10/day | $5/day |
|
|
75
|
+
| Meta Ads | $20/day | $10/day |
|
|
76
|
+
| LinkedIn Ads | $50/day | $25/day |
|
|
77
|
+
| TikTok Ads | $50/day campaign | $20/day ad group |
|
|
78
|
+
| Microsoft Ads | $10/day | $5/day |
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
## Scaling Rules
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
1. Max 20% budget increase per week
|
|
83
|
+
2. Only scale campaigns that exited learning phase
|
|
84
|
+
3. 3x Kill Rule: Pause if CPA > 3x target
|
|
85
|
+
4. Minimum 2 weeks data before major changes
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
---
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_START -->
|
|
90
|
+
## Compact Summary
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
**Command**: `/agileflow:ads:budget` - Budget & bidding strategy audit
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
**Agent**: `ads-audit-budget` (24 checks, 4 categories)
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
**Quick Usage**: `/agileflow:ads:budget <account-data>`
|
|
97
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_END -->
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Competitive intelligence for paid advertising - market positioning, messaging gaps, ad copy analysis, and strategic recommendations
|
|
3
|
+
argument-hint: "<industry-or-competitors>"
|
|
4
|
+
compact_context:
|
|
5
|
+
priority: medium
|
|
6
|
+
preserve_rules:
|
|
7
|
+
- "ACTIVE COMMAND: /agileflow:ads:competitor - Competitive intelligence"
|
|
8
|
+
- "Use WebSearch for competitor research"
|
|
9
|
+
- "Focus on ad-specific competitive factors"
|
|
10
|
+
state_fields:
|
|
11
|
+
- industry
|
|
12
|
+
- competitors
|
|
13
|
+
---
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
# /agileflow:ads:competitor
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
Analyze competitive landscape for paid advertising, including competitor ad strategies, messaging positioning, and market gaps.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
---
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Quick Reference
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
```
|
|
24
|
+
/agileflow:ads:competitor "SaaS project management" # Industry research
|
|
25
|
+
/agileflow:ads:competitor "competitor1, competitor2" # Specific competitors
|
|
26
|
+
```
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
---
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Process
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### STEP 1: Identify Competitors
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
If competitors not specified, use WebSearch to identify top advertisers in the space:
|
|
35
|
+
- Search for industry keywords and note who's advertising
|
|
36
|
+
- Look for "Sponsored" results on Google
|
|
37
|
+
- Check Meta Ad Library for active advertisers
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
### STEP 2: Analyze Competitor Ads
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
For each competitor, research:
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
| Factor | How to Find | What to Note |
|
|
44
|
+
|--------|------------|-------------|
|
|
45
|
+
| **Ad copy themes** | Google search, Ad Library | Headlines, CTAs, value props |
|
|
46
|
+
| **Landing pages** | Click through ads | Page structure, offers, forms |
|
|
47
|
+
| **Platforms active** | Ad libraries, social | Which platforms they invest in |
|
|
48
|
+
| **Offer positioning** | Ad copy, landing pages | Free trial, discount, demo |
|
|
49
|
+
| **Audience signals** | LinkedIn ads, social targeting | Who they're targeting |
|
|
50
|
+
| **Creative style** | Ad Library | Video vs image, UGC, professional |
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
### STEP 3: Gap Analysis
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
Identify opportunities the user can exploit:
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
```markdown
|
|
57
|
+
## Competitive Intelligence Report
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
### Competitor Overview
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
| Competitor | Platforms | Key Message | Offer | Ad Style |
|
|
62
|
+
|-----------|-----------|------------|-------|---------|
|
|
63
|
+
| {name} | {platforms} | {message} | {offer} | {style} |
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
### Messaging Gaps
|
|
66
|
+
{Where competitors are NOT messaging - opportunities for differentiation}
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
### Ad Format Gaps
|
|
69
|
+
{Ad types/platforms competitors aren't using}
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
### Positioning Recommendations
|
|
72
|
+
1. **Differentiate on**: {unique angle}
|
|
73
|
+
2. **Counter-position**: {how to position against top competitor}
|
|
74
|
+
3. **Underserved keyword themes**: {keyword areas competitors miss}
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
### Suggested Ad Copy Angles
|
|
77
|
+
- **Angle 1**: {headline idea} - Why: {competitive reason}
|
|
78
|
+
- **Angle 2**: {headline idea} - Why: {competitive reason}
|
|
79
|
+
- **Angle 3**: {headline idea} - Why: {competitive reason}
|
|
80
|
+
```
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
### STEP 4: Offer Next Steps
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
```xml
|
|
85
|
+
<invoke name="AskUserQuestion">
|
|
86
|
+
<parameter name="questions">[{
|
|
87
|
+
"question": "Competitive analysis complete. {N} competitors analyzed, {M} messaging gaps found.",
|
|
88
|
+
"header": "Next steps",
|
|
89
|
+
"multiSelect": false,
|
|
90
|
+
"options": [
|
|
91
|
+
{"label": "Build campaign plan using these insights (Recommended)", "description": "Run /agileflow:ads:plan with competitive positioning"},
|
|
92
|
+
{"label": "Audit our current ads against findings", "description": "Compare your ads to competitor strategies"},
|
|
93
|
+
{"label": "Deep-dive into specific competitor", "description": "More detailed analysis of one competitor"},
|
|
94
|
+
{"label": "Generate ad copy based on gaps", "description": "Create ad copy exploiting found gaps"}
|
|
95
|
+
]
|
|
96
|
+
}]</parameter>
|
|
97
|
+
</invoke>
|
|
98
|
+
```
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
---
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_START -->
|
|
103
|
+
## Compact Summary
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
**Command**: `/agileflow:ads:competitor` - Competitive intelligence for ads
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
**Input**: Industry or competitor names
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
**Output**: Competitor ad analysis, messaging gaps, positioning recommendations
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
**Quick Usage**: `/agileflow:ads:competitor <industry-or-competitors>`
|
|
112
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_END -->
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Cross-platform creative quality review with 21 checks for ad copy effectiveness, visual compliance, format coverage, and performance testing
|
|
3
|
+
argument-hint: "<account-data>"
|
|
4
|
+
compact_context:
|
|
5
|
+
priority: medium
|
|
6
|
+
preserve_rules:
|
|
7
|
+
- "ACTIVE COMMAND: /agileflow:ads:creative - Creative quality review"
|
|
8
|
+
- "Delegate to ads-audit-creative agent for 21 checks"
|
|
9
|
+
state_fields:
|
|
10
|
+
- creative_score
|
|
11
|
+
---
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
# /agileflow:ads:creative
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
Run a creative quality audit across all ad platforms using the `ads-audit-creative` agent with 21 checks.
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
---
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Quick Reference
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
```
|
|
22
|
+
/agileflow:ads:creative <account-data> # Cross-platform creative review
|
|
23
|
+
```
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
---
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Process
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
### STEP 1: Validate Input
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
If no data provided, ask the user to share:
|
|
32
|
+
- Ad copy (headlines, descriptions, primary text)
|
|
33
|
+
- Creative assets (image specs, video details)
|
|
34
|
+
- Platform-specific formatting
|
|
35
|
+
- Performance metrics (CTR, CPC, frequency)
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
### STEP 2: Deploy Creative Analyzer
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
```xml
|
|
40
|
+
<invoke name="Task">
|
|
41
|
+
<parameter name="description">Creative quality audit</parameter>
|
|
42
|
+
<parameter name="prompt">TASK: Audit creative quality across all platforms.
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
ACCOUNT DATA:
|
|
45
|
+
{creative_data}
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
Apply ALL 21 checks across 4 categories:
|
|
48
|
+
- Ad Copy Effectiveness (30%) - 7 checks
|
|
49
|
+
- Visual & Format Compliance (25%) - 6 checks
|
|
50
|
+
- Platform-Specific Requirements (25%) - 4 checks
|
|
51
|
+
- Performance & Testing (20%) - 4 checks
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
Check safe zones (TikTok, Meta Stories), character limits, and restricted content.
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
OUTPUT: Full findings with Creative Score X/100</parameter>
|
|
56
|
+
<parameter name="subagent_type">ads-audit-creative</parameter>
|
|
57
|
+
</invoke>
|
|
58
|
+
```
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
### STEP 3: Present Results
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
Show Creative Score and offer actionable next steps.
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
---
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
## 21 Checks Overview
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
| Category | Weight | Checks | Focus |
|
|
69
|
+
|----------|--------|--------|-------|
|
|
70
|
+
| Ad Copy Effectiveness | 30% | 7 | Value prop, CTA, social proof, keyword alignment |
|
|
71
|
+
| Visual & Format | 25% | 6 | Resolution, text overlay, brand, mobile-first |
|
|
72
|
+
| Platform Requirements | 25% | 4 | Format coverage, native style, char limits, compliance |
|
|
73
|
+
| Performance & Testing | 20% | 4 | Diversity, winner ID, refresh cadence, A/B testing |
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
---
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_START -->
|
|
78
|
+
## Compact Summary
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
**Command**: `/agileflow:ads:creative` - Cross-platform creative quality review
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
**Agent**: `ads-audit-creative` (21 checks, 4 categories)
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
**Quick Usage**: `/agileflow:ads:creative <account-data>`
|
|
85
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_END -->
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Google Ads deep-dive audit with 74 deterministic checks across conversion tracking, spend efficiency, account structure, keywords, ad copy, and settings
|
|
3
|
+
argument-hint: "<account-data>"
|
|
4
|
+
compact_context:
|
|
5
|
+
priority: medium
|
|
6
|
+
preserve_rules:
|
|
7
|
+
- "ACTIVE COMMAND: /agileflow:ads:google - Google Ads deep-dive"
|
|
8
|
+
- "Delegate to ads-audit-google agent for 74 checks"
|
|
9
|
+
- "Quality gates: tracking required, no Broad without Smart Bidding, 3x Kill Rule"
|
|
10
|
+
state_fields:
|
|
11
|
+
- google_score
|
|
12
|
+
---
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
# /agileflow:ads:google
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Run a deep-dive audit on a Google Ads account using the `ads-audit-google` agent with 74 deterministic checks across 6 categories.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
---
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Quick Reference
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
```
|
|
23
|
+
/agileflow:ads:google <account-data> # Full Google Ads audit
|
|
24
|
+
```
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
---
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Process
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
### STEP 1: Validate Input
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
If no account data provided, ask the user to paste or describe their Google Ads setup including:
|
|
33
|
+
- Campaign types and objectives
|
|
34
|
+
- Budget and spend data
|
|
35
|
+
- Keyword match types and Quality Scores
|
|
36
|
+
- Ad copy and extensions
|
|
37
|
+
- Conversion tracking setup
|
|
38
|
+
- Bid strategies in use
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
### STEP 2: Deploy Google Ads Analyzer
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
```xml
|
|
43
|
+
<invoke name="Task">
|
|
44
|
+
<parameter name="description">Google Ads deep-dive audit</parameter>
|
|
45
|
+
<parameter name="prompt">TASK: Run a comprehensive Google Ads audit.
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
ACCOUNT DATA:
|
|
48
|
+
{account_data}
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
Apply ALL 74 checks across 6 weighted categories:
|
|
51
|
+
- Conversion Tracking (25%) - 12 checks
|
|
52
|
+
- Wasted Spend (25%) - 15 checks
|
|
53
|
+
- Account Structure (15%) - 12 checks
|
|
54
|
+
- Keyword Strategy (15%) - 14 checks
|
|
55
|
+
- Ad Copy Quality (10%) - 11 checks
|
|
56
|
+
- Campaign Settings (10%) - 10 checks
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
Enforce ALL quality gates:
|
|
59
|
+
1. No optimization without conversion tracking
|
|
60
|
+
2. No Broad Match without Smart Bidding
|
|
61
|
+
3. 3x Kill Rule for CPA
|
|
62
|
+
4. Brand/non-brand separation
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
OUTPUT: Full findings with Google Ads Score X/100</parameter>
|
|
65
|
+
<parameter name="subagent_type">ads-audit-google</parameter>
|
|
66
|
+
</invoke>
|
|
67
|
+
```
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
### STEP 3: Present Results
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
Show the Google Ads Score and key findings, then offer next steps:
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
```xml
|
|
74
|
+
<invoke name="AskUserQuestion">
|
|
75
|
+
<parameter name="questions">[{
|
|
76
|
+
"question": "Google Ads Audit: Score {X}/100. {N} findings ({critical} critical). Quality gates: {status}.",
|
|
77
|
+
"header": "Next steps",
|
|
78
|
+
"multiSelect": false,
|
|
79
|
+
"options": [
|
|
80
|
+
{"label": "Fix critical issues (Recommended)", "description": "{top issues}"},
|
|
81
|
+
{"label": "Run full multi-platform audit", "description": "Check all platforms together"},
|
|
82
|
+
{"label": "Optimize budget allocation", "description": "Run /agileflow:ads:budget"},
|
|
83
|
+
{"label": "Review creative quality", "description": "Run /agileflow:ads:creative"}
|
|
84
|
+
]
|
|
85
|
+
}]</parameter>
|
|
86
|
+
</invoke>
|
|
87
|
+
```
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
---
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
## 74 Checks Overview
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
| Category | Weight | Checks | Focus |
|
|
94
|
+
|----------|--------|--------|-------|
|
|
95
|
+
| Conversion Tracking | 25% | 12 | Tag, enhanced conversions, CAPI, consent mode |
|
|
96
|
+
| Wasted Spend | 25% | 15 | Negatives, search terms, 3x rule, QS, network |
|
|
97
|
+
| Account Structure | 15% | 12 | Naming, ad groups, PMax isolation, experiments |
|
|
98
|
+
| Keyword Strategy | 15% | 14 | Match types, QS distribution, intent alignment |
|
|
99
|
+
| Ad Copy Quality | 10% | 11 | RSAs, headlines, CTAs, extensions, testing |
|
|
100
|
+
| Campaign Settings | 10% | 10 | Bidding, location, auto-apply, remarketing |
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
---
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_START -->
|
|
105
|
+
## Compact Summary
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
**Command**: `/agileflow:ads:google` - Google Ads deep-dive audit
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
**Agent**: `ads-audit-google` (74 checks, 6 categories)
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
**Quick Usage**: `/agileflow:ads:google <account-data>`
|
|
112
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_END -->
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Landing page optimization audit for ad campaigns - Core Web Vitals, CTA effectiveness, trust signals, mobile experience, and message match
|
|
3
|
+
argument-hint: "<URL>"
|
|
4
|
+
compact_context:
|
|
5
|
+
priority: medium
|
|
6
|
+
preserve_rules:
|
|
7
|
+
- "ACTIVE COMMAND: /agileflow:ads:landing - Landing page optimization"
|
|
8
|
+
- "Use WebFetch to analyze the actual landing page"
|
|
9
|
+
- "Check CWV, CTA, trust signals, mobile, message match"
|
|
10
|
+
state_fields:
|
|
11
|
+
- target_url
|
|
12
|
+
- landing_score
|
|
13
|
+
---
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
# /agileflow:ads:landing
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
Audit a landing page for paid advertising effectiveness. Analyzes the page for conversion rate optimization factors that directly impact ad campaign performance.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
---
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Quick Reference
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
```
|
|
24
|
+
/agileflow:ads:landing https://example.com/offer # Audit landing page
|
|
25
|
+
```
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
---
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Process
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
### STEP 1: Fetch Landing Page
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
Use WebFetch to retrieve the target URL. Extract:
|
|
34
|
+
- Page structure (H1, form, CTA buttons)
|
|
35
|
+
- Load performance indicators
|
|
36
|
+
- Trust signals (testimonials, badges, reviews)
|
|
37
|
+
- Mobile responsiveness indicators
|
|
38
|
+
- Form fields and friction points
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
### STEP 2: Run 15 Checks
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
| # | Check | Severity | Pass Criteria |
|
|
43
|
+
|---|-------|----------|---------------|
|
|
44
|
+
| LP-1 | Page loads < 3 seconds | HIGH | LCP < 2.5s, FCP < 1.8s |
|
|
45
|
+
| LP-2 | Single clear CTA | HIGH | One primary CTA visible above fold |
|
|
46
|
+
| LP-3 | Headline matches ad copy | CRITICAL | H1 reflects the ad's promise |
|
|
47
|
+
| LP-4 | Mobile responsive | HIGH | Viewport meta + responsive design |
|
|
48
|
+
| LP-5 | Form friction | HIGH | < 5 form fields for lead gen |
|
|
49
|
+
| LP-6 | Trust signals present | MEDIUM | Testimonials, reviews, badges, logos |
|
|
50
|
+
| LP-7 | No navigation distractions | MEDIUM | Minimal or no top navigation |
|
|
51
|
+
| LP-8 | Social proof | MEDIUM | Customer count, ratings, case studies |
|
|
52
|
+
| LP-9 | Urgency element | LOW | Deadline, limited availability (if genuine) |
|
|
53
|
+
| LP-10 | Phone number visible | MEDIUM | Click-to-call for service businesses |
|
|
54
|
+
| LP-11 | Privacy policy linked | HIGH | Required for ad platform compliance |
|
|
55
|
+
| LP-12 | SSL certificate | CRITICAL | HTTPS required |
|
|
56
|
+
| LP-13 | No broken images/links | HIGH | All resources load correctly |
|
|
57
|
+
| LP-14 | Thank you page/confirmation | MEDIUM | Post-conversion confirmation page |
|
|
58
|
+
| LP-15 | Tracking pixels present | CRITICAL | GTM/Pixel/tag detected on page |
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
### STEP 3: Score and Report
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
```markdown
|
|
63
|
+
## Landing Page Audit: {URL}
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
**Landing Page Score**: {X}/100
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
| Check | Status | Severity | Notes |
|
|
68
|
+
|-------|--------|----------|-------|
|
|
69
|
+
| LP-1 Page speed | PASS/FAIL | HIGH | {LCP time} |
|
|
70
|
+
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
### Critical Issues
|
|
73
|
+
{List any CRITICAL failures}
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
### Quick Wins
|
|
76
|
+
{Easy fixes that improve conversion rate}
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
### Message Match Analysis
|
|
79
|
+
- **Ad headline**: {if provided}
|
|
80
|
+
- **Landing page H1**: {extracted}
|
|
81
|
+
- **Match quality**: {Strong/Weak/Mismatch}
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
### Conversion Rate Optimization Suggestions
|
|
84
|
+
1. {Specific suggestion with expected impact}
|
|
85
|
+
2. {Suggestion}
|
|
86
|
+
3. {Suggestion}
|
|
87
|
+
```
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
### STEP 4: Offer Next Steps
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
```xml
|
|
92
|
+
<invoke name="AskUserQuestion">
|
|
93
|
+
<parameter name="questions">[{
|
|
94
|
+
"question": "Landing page score: {X}/100. {N} issues found. What would you like to do?",
|
|
95
|
+
"header": "Next steps",
|
|
96
|
+
"multiSelect": false,
|
|
97
|
+
"options": [
|
|
98
|
+
{"label": "Fix critical issues (Recommended)", "description": "{top issue}"},
|
|
99
|
+
{"label": "Run full ads audit", "description": "Check ad account + landing page together"},
|
|
100
|
+
{"label": "Test another landing page", "description": "Compare multiple landing pages"},
|
|
101
|
+
{"label": "Optimize for specific platform", "description": "Platform-specific landing page requirements"}
|
|
102
|
+
]
|
|
103
|
+
}]</parameter>
|
|
104
|
+
</invoke>
|
|
105
|
+
```
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
---
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_START -->
|
|
110
|
+
## Compact Summary
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
**Command**: `/agileflow:ads:landing` - Landing page optimization for ads
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
**Input**: URL of landing page
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
**Output**: 15-check audit with CRO suggestions
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
**Quick Usage**: `/agileflow:ads:landing <URL>`
|
|
119
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_END -->
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: LinkedIn Ads audit with 9 checks for lead gen forms, audience targeting, budget efficiency, and CRM integration
|
|
3
|
+
argument-hint: "<account-data>"
|
|
4
|
+
compact_context:
|
|
5
|
+
priority: medium
|
|
6
|
+
preserve_rules:
|
|
7
|
+
- "ACTIVE COMMAND: /agileflow:ads:linkedin - LinkedIn Ads audit"
|
|
8
|
+
- "Inline command - 9 checks, no separate agent needed"
|
|
9
|
+
- "Min budget: $50/day campaign, $25/day ad group"
|
|
10
|
+
state_fields:
|
|
11
|
+
- linkedin_score
|
|
12
|
+
---
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
# /agileflow:ads:linkedin
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Run an inline audit on a LinkedIn Ads account with 9 focused checks. LinkedIn has the highest CPCs in paid social, so efficiency is critical.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
---
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Quick Reference
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
```
|
|
23
|
+
/agileflow:ads:linkedin <account-data> # LinkedIn Ads audit
|
|
24
|
+
```
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
---
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## The 9 Checks
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
| # | Check | Severity | Pass Criteria |
|
|
31
|
+
|---|-------|----------|---------------|
|
|
32
|
+
| LI-1 | Insight Tag installed | CRITICAL | LinkedIn Insight Tag on all pages |
|
|
33
|
+
| LI-2 | Lead Gen Forms vs landing pages | HIGH | Lead Gen Forms tested (typically 2-5x better CVR) |
|
|
34
|
+
| LI-3 | Audience size appropriate | HIGH | 50K-500K for Sponsored Content |
|
|
35
|
+
| LI-4 | Company/title targeting precision | HIGH | Targeting by job title or function, not just industry |
|
|
36
|
+
| LI-5 | Budget meets minimum | CRITICAL | Minimum $50/day per campaign |
|
|
37
|
+
| LI-6 | CRM integration active | HIGH | Leads syncing to CRM within 24 hours |
|
|
38
|
+
| LI-7 | Content type mix | MEDIUM | Single image + carousel + video tested |
|
|
39
|
+
| LI-8 | Matched Audiences | MEDIUM | Website retargeting + company list + LAL active |
|
|
40
|
+
| LI-9 | ABM alignment | LOW | Account-Based Marketing lists for enterprise |
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
---
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
## Process
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
### STEP 1: Apply All 9 Checks
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
Review the account data against each check. For LinkedIn specifically:
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
**Budget reality check**: LinkedIn CPCs are $5-15 for Sponsored Content. With $50/day minimum:
|
|
51
|
+
- Daily clicks: ~3-10
|
|
52
|
+
- Monthly clicks: ~100-300
|
|
53
|
+
- At 5% conversion rate: ~5-15 leads/month
|
|
54
|
+
- **Minimum viable budget for lead gen: $100/day recommended**
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
**Lead Gen Forms vs Landing Pages**:
|
|
57
|
+
- Lead Gen Forms: 10-30% conversion rate (pre-filled data)
|
|
58
|
+
- Landing Pages: 2-5% conversion rate
|
|
59
|
+
- Always test Lead Gen Forms first on LinkedIn
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
### STEP 2: Score
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
```
|
|
64
|
+
LinkedIn Score = 100 - sum(severity_deductions)
|
|
65
|
+
```
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
Deductions: CRITICAL (-15), HIGH (-8), MEDIUM (-4), LOW (-2)
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
### STEP 3: Output
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
```markdown
|
|
72
|
+
## LinkedIn Ads Audit
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
**LinkedIn Score**: {X}/100
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
| Check | Status | Notes |
|
|
77
|
+
|-------|--------|-------|
|
|
78
|
+
| LI-1 Insight Tag | PASS/FAIL | {details} |
|
|
79
|
+
| LI-2 Lead Gen Forms | PASS/FAIL | {details} |
|
|
80
|
+
| LI-3 Audience size | PASS/FAIL | {size estimate} |
|
|
81
|
+
| LI-4 Targeting precision | PASS/FAIL | {targeting method} |
|
|
82
|
+
| LI-5 Budget minimum | PASS/FAIL | ${daily}/day |
|
|
83
|
+
| LI-6 CRM integration | PASS/FAIL | {sync status} |
|
|
84
|
+
| LI-7 Content types | PASS/FAIL | {formats in use} |
|
|
85
|
+
| LI-8 Matched Audiences | PASS/FAIL | {audience types} |
|
|
86
|
+
| LI-9 ABM alignment | PASS/FAIL | {ABM status} |
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
### Key Recommendations
|
|
89
|
+
1. {Top priority fix}
|
|
90
|
+
2. {Second priority}
|
|
91
|
+
3. {Third priority}
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
### LinkedIn-Specific Tips
|
|
94
|
+
- Use Lead Gen Forms for B2B lead generation (2-5x better CVR)
|
|
95
|
+
- Minimum audience size 50K for Sponsored Content
|
|
96
|
+
- Test Document Ads for thought leadership
|
|
97
|
+
- Message Ads have highest response rate but lowest scale
|
|
98
|
+
```
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
---
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_START -->
|
|
103
|
+
## Compact Summary
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
**Command**: `/agileflow:ads:linkedin` - LinkedIn Ads audit
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
**Checks**: 9 (inline, no separate agent)
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
**Key**: Min $50/day, Lead Gen Forms > Landing Pages, 50K-500K audience
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
**Quick Usage**: `/agileflow:ads:linkedin <account-data>`
|
|
112
|
+
<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_END -->
|