@riddledc/riddle-proof-packs 0.4.4 → 0.4.6

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (31) hide show
  1. package/README.md +12 -1
  2. package/bin/riddle-proof-review-packet +4 -0
  3. package/dist/chunk-SAE6HFAG.js +139 -0
  4. package/dist/humanReviewPacket-APSxuvat.d.cts +17 -0
  5. package/dist/humanReviewPacket-APSxuvat.d.ts +17 -0
  6. package/dist/index.cjs +187 -2
  7. package/dist/index.d.cts +2 -17
  8. package/dist/index.d.ts +2 -17
  9. package/dist/index.js +190 -131
  10. package/dist/reviewPacketCli.cjs +323 -0
  11. package/dist/reviewPacketCli.d.cts +28 -0
  12. package/dist/reviewPacketCli.d.ts +28 -0
  13. package/dist/reviewPacketCli.js +155 -0
  14. package/package.json +6 -2
  15. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/README.md +3 -0
  16. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/case-study/findings.md +11 -0
  17. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/case-study/ratchet-card.md +2 -1
  18. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/case-study/ratchet-log.md +55 -0
  19. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/examples/README.md +3 -1
  20. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/examples/run-006-ratchet-loop-human-review-packet/human-review-packet.md +3 -0
  21. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/examples/run-007-approved-candidate-applied/artifact-manifest.json +32 -0
  22. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/examples/run-007-approved-candidate-applied/console.json +4 -0
  23. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/examples/run-007-approved-candidate-applied/dom-summary.json +40 -0
  24. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/examples/run-007-approved-candidate-applied/human-review-packet.json +801 -0
  25. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/examples/run-007-approved-candidate-applied/human-review-packet.md +52 -0
  26. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/examples/run-007-approved-candidate-applied/profile-result.json +11994 -0
  27. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/examples/run-007-approved-candidate-applied/proof.json +11994 -0
  28. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/examples/run-007-approved-candidate-applied/screenshots/lilarcade-neon-ratchet-loop-approved-candidate-desktop-neon-ratchet-loop-approved-candidate.png +0 -0
  29. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/examples/run-007-approved-candidate-applied/screenshots/lilarcade-neon-ratchet-loop-approved-candidate-desktop.png +0 -0
  30. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/examples/run-007-approved-candidate-applied/summary.md +32 -0
  31. package/packs/neon-step-sequencer/profiles/ratchet-loop-approved-candidate.json +177 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
1
+ # Run 007 - Approved candidate applied
2
+
3
+ - profile: `lilarcade-neon-ratchet-loop-approved-candidate`
4
+ - evidence_role_pattern: `interaction_snapshots`
5
+ - runner: `local-playwright`
6
+ - status: `passed`
7
+ - captured_at: `2026-05-24T13:41:23.987Z`
8
+ - target: `http://127.0.0.1:5177/games/drum-sequencer?song=monkberry-moon-delight-tab&mix=profile&view=trainer&instrument=bass`
9
+
10
+ ## Claim
11
+
12
+ Neon can take a supported mix-level change-claim candidate, use an explicit operator-approval surrogate, apply that candidate for listening review, and preserve a proof packet that still separates objective receipts from subjective taste.
13
+
14
+ ## Evidence
15
+
16
+ | field | value |
17
+ | --- | --- |
18
+ | loop status | `claim_candidate_supported` |
19
+ | human-review packet status | `candidate_applied_for_listening_review` |
20
+ | approval mode | `mixing_canon_surrogate` |
21
+ | recommended candidate | `chord -0.10` |
22
+ | applied candidate receipt | `passed` |
23
+ | applied level | `0.28` |
24
+ | supported candidates | `6` |
25
+ | rejected candidates | `0` |
26
+ | state restored before apply | `true` |
27
+ | ranking role | `review_order_only` |
28
+ | fatal console errors | `0` |
29
+
30
+ ## Verdict
31
+
32
+ Passed. The proof supports that the candidate was objectively supported, the loop restored state before the final apply step, and the approved candidate was applied for listening review. It does not prove that the candidate is musically preferable; the packet keeps the listening-review caveat explicit.
@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
1
+ {
2
+ "version": "riddle-proof.profile.v1",
3
+ "name": "neon-step-sequencer-ratchet-loop-approved-candidate",
4
+ "target": {
5
+ "route": "/games/drum-sequencer?song=monkberry-moon-delight-tab&mix=profile&view=trainer&instrument=bass",
6
+ "viewports": [
7
+ {
8
+ "name": "desktop",
9
+ "width": 1440,
10
+ "height": 1000
11
+ }
12
+ ],
13
+ "timeout_sec": 360,
14
+ "wait_for_selector": ".drum-sequencer h1",
15
+ "setup_actions": [
16
+ {
17
+ "type": "window_eval",
18
+ "label": "capture-neon-contract",
19
+ "timeout_ms": 10000,
20
+ "store_return_to": "__neonMixProof.contract",
21
+ "script": "const contract=window.__NEON_MIX_PROOF__; const diagnostic=contract?.captureDiagnostic?.(); window.__neonMixProof={...(window.__neonMixProof||{}),contract:{available:Boolean(contract),diagnostic}}; return window.__neonMixProof.contract;",
22
+ "return_summary_fields": [
23
+ {
24
+ "path": "available"
25
+ },
26
+ {
27
+ "path": "diagnostic.selectedSong.selectedSong"
28
+ }
29
+ ]
30
+ },
31
+ {
32
+ "type": "assert_window_value",
33
+ "path": "__neonMixProof.contract.available",
34
+ "expected_value": true,
35
+ "timeout_ms": 10000
36
+ },
37
+ {
38
+ "type": "window_call",
39
+ "label": "apply-approved-claim-candidate",
40
+ "path": "__NEON_MIX_PROOF__.runRatchetLoop",
41
+ "args": [
42
+ {
43
+ "intent": "turn the chord part down a little",
44
+ "strategy": "mix-level-search",
45
+ "focusTracks": [
46
+ "bass",
47
+ "chord",
48
+ "guitar",
49
+ "rhythmSynth"
50
+ ],
51
+ "maxIterations": 6,
52
+ "monitorProfile": "smallSpeaker",
53
+ "restore": true,
54
+ "applyBest": true,
55
+ "approval": {
56
+ "mode": "mixing_canon_surrogate",
57
+ "approvedBy": "codex",
58
+ "basis": "subtle level reduction after objective receipts pass; this keeps development moving while preserving a listening-review caveat"
59
+ }
60
+ }
61
+ ],
62
+ "store_return_to": "__neonMixProof.approvedCandidateLoop",
63
+ "capture_return": true,
64
+ "timeout_ms": 240000,
65
+ "return_summary_fields": [
66
+ {
67
+ "path": "ok"
68
+ },
69
+ {
70
+ "path": "status"
71
+ },
72
+ {
73
+ "path": "best.claimVerdict.status"
74
+ },
75
+ {
76
+ "path": "best.claimCandidate.action.track"
77
+ },
78
+ {
79
+ "path": "appliedCandidateReceipt.ok"
80
+ },
81
+ {
82
+ "path": "humanReviewPacket.status"
83
+ },
84
+ {
85
+ "path": "humanReviewPacket.request.approval.mode"
86
+ },
87
+ {
88
+ "path": "humanReviewPacket.ranking.role"
89
+ }
90
+ ]
91
+ },
92
+ {
93
+ "type": "assert_window_value",
94
+ "path": "__neonMixProof.approvedCandidateLoop.ok",
95
+ "expected_value": true,
96
+ "timeout_ms": 10000
97
+ },
98
+ {
99
+ "type": "assert_window_value",
100
+ "path": "__neonMixProof.approvedCandidateLoop.appliedCandidateReceipt.ok",
101
+ "expected_value": true,
102
+ "timeout_ms": 10000
103
+ },
104
+ {
105
+ "type": "assert_window_value",
106
+ "path": "__neonMixProof.approvedCandidateLoop.humanReviewPacket.status",
107
+ "expected_value": "candidate_applied_for_listening_review",
108
+ "timeout_ms": 10000
109
+ },
110
+ {
111
+ "type": "assert_window_value",
112
+ "path": "__neonMixProof.approvedCandidateLoop.humanReviewPacket.request.candidateActionsAreTransient",
113
+ "expected_value": false,
114
+ "timeout_ms": 10000
115
+ },
116
+ {
117
+ "type": "assert_window_value",
118
+ "path": "__neonMixProof.approvedCandidateLoop.humanReviewPacket.guardrails.approvedCandidateApplied",
119
+ "expected_value": true,
120
+ "timeout_ms": 10000
121
+ },
122
+ {
123
+ "type": "screenshot",
124
+ "label": "neon-step-sequencer-ratchet-loop-approved-candidate",
125
+ "mode": "viewport"
126
+ }
127
+ ]
128
+ },
129
+ "checks": [
130
+ {
131
+ "type": "route_loaded",
132
+ "expected_path": "/games/drum-sequencer"
133
+ },
134
+ {
135
+ "type": "selector_visible",
136
+ "selector": ".drum-sequencer h1"
137
+ },
138
+ {
139
+ "type": "no_horizontal_overflow"
140
+ },
141
+ {
142
+ "type": "no_fatal_console_errors"
143
+ }
144
+ ],
145
+ "artifacts": [
146
+ "screenshot",
147
+ "console",
148
+ "dom_summary",
149
+ "proof_json"
150
+ ],
151
+ "baseline_policy": "invariant_only",
152
+ "failure_policy": {
153
+ "environment_blocked": "neutral",
154
+ "proof_insufficient": "review",
155
+ "needs_human_review": "review",
156
+ "product_regression": "fail"
157
+ },
158
+ "metadata": {
159
+ "pack_id": "neon_step_sequencer",
160
+ "pack_public_name": "Neon Step Sequencer Pack",
161
+ "evidence_role_pattern": "interaction_snapshots",
162
+ "purpose": "Run a bounded loop, use an explicit operator-approval surrogate, apply the supported claim candidate, and preserve a listening-review packet.",
163
+ "required_receipts": [
164
+ "ratchet loop returns ok",
165
+ "a supported claim candidate is selected",
166
+ "approved candidate application receipt is captured",
167
+ "compact human-review packet is captured",
168
+ "ranking remains review-order only",
169
+ "listening-review caveat remains explicit"
170
+ ],
171
+ "does_not_prove": [
172
+ "subjective mix quality",
173
+ "that the approval surrogate is a real listener preference",
174
+ "all possible mix edits"
175
+ ]
176
+ }
177
+ }