@htekdev/actions-debugger 1.0.62 → 1.0.64

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
1
+ id: caching-artifacts-042
2
+ title: "Cache key containing github.sha always misses on restore — cache is saved but never reused"
3
+ category: caching-artifacts
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - cache
7
+ - cache-key
8
+ - github-sha
9
+ - cache-miss
10
+ - restore-keys
11
+ - performance
12
+ patterns:
13
+ - regex: 'Cache not found for input keys: .*\b[0-9a-f]{40}\b'
14
+ flags: i
15
+ - regex: 'Warning: Cache not found for.*sha.*\.'
16
+ flags: i
17
+ - regex: 'Cache restored from key: .*\b[0-9a-f]{40}\b'
18
+ flags: i
19
+ error_messages:
20
+ - "Cache not found for input keys: Linux-node-a3f2b1c9d4e5f6a7b8c9d0e1f2a3b4c5d6e7f8a9"
21
+ - "Warning: Cache not found for key: ubuntu-latest-npm-abc1234def5678901234567890abcdef12345678"
22
+ root_cause: |
23
+ When a cache key includes ${{ github.sha }}, every commit produces a unique key. The cache is
24
+ saved successfully at the end of the workflow, but on the very next run the sha is different,
25
+ so the restore step finds no matching cache entry and declares a miss. This pattern ensures
26
+ the cache is written once and thrown away — it provides no performance benefit.
27
+
28
+ This mistake is common because github.sha is a readily available context value and its use
29
+ in cache keys looks reasonable at first glance. The cache action's restore-keys fallback
30
+ mechanism would normally rescue a miss, but developers often omit restore-keys when using
31
+ sha-based keys, expecting the primary key to match.
32
+ fix: |
33
+ Replace github.sha with a hash of the files that determine cache validity, such as
34
+ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') for npm or hashFiles('**/go.sum') for Go. Use github.sha
35
+ only as a restore-keys fallback prefix if you want a per-commit cache layer on top of a
36
+ stable base cache. The cache key should be stable across commits unless the relevant
37
+ dependency manifest changes.
38
+ fix_code:
39
+ - language: yaml
40
+ label: "Correct cache key using hashFiles instead of github.sha"
41
+ code: |
42
+ - name: Cache node modules
43
+ uses: actions/cache@v4
44
+ with:
45
+ path: ~/.npm
46
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}
47
+ restore-keys: |
48
+ ${{ runner.os }}-node-
49
+ - language: yaml
50
+ label: "Per-commit layer on top of a stable base cache (advanced)"
51
+ code: |
52
+ # Stable key hits on re-runs; sha layer saves per-commit installs
53
+ - name: Cache node modules
54
+ uses: actions/cache@v4
55
+ with:
56
+ path: ~/.npm
57
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ github.sha }}
58
+ restore-keys: |
59
+ ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}
60
+ ${{ runner.os }}-node-
61
+ prevention:
62
+ - "Never use github.sha as a primary cache key unless you explicitly want a per-commit cache that never restores"
63
+ - "Use hashFiles() over the relevant lock file or manifest as the stable portion of the cache key"
64
+ - "Always add restore-keys with progressively broader prefixes to benefit from partial cache hits"
65
+ - "Check the cache hit rate in the Actions UI — 0% hit rate on restore is a sign the key is too unique"
66
+ docs:
67
+ - url: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/caching-dependencies-to-speed-up-workflows#using-the-cache-action
68
+ label: "GitHub Docs: Using the cache action"
69
+ - url: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/caching-dependencies-to-speed-up-workflows#matching-a-cache-key
70
+ label: "GitHub Docs: Matching a cache key"
71
+ - url: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59435153/github-actions-cache-miss-every-run
72
+ label: "Stack Overflow: GitHub Actions cache miss every run"
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
1
+ id: known-unsolved-041
2
+ title: "services: Block Not Supported on macOS and Windows Runners — Silently Ignored"
3
+ category: known-unsolved
4
+ severity: limitation
5
+ tags:
6
+ - services
7
+ - service-containers
8
+ - macos
9
+ - windows
10
+ - linux-only
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'services\s*:'
13
+ flags: 'im'
14
+ - regex: 'runs-on\s*:\s*(macos|windows)'
15
+ flags: 'i'
16
+ error_messages:
17
+ - "Connection refused 127.0.0.1:5432"
18
+ - "Unable to connect to the database server"
19
+ - "ECONNREFUSED"
20
+ - "connect ECONNREFUSED 127.0.0.1:6379"
21
+ root_cause: |
22
+ GitHub Actions `services:` containers are only supported on Linux (Ubuntu) runners.
23
+ On macOS and Windows GitHub-hosted runners, the `services:` block is silently ignored
24
+ — the job starts without the service containers, and no warning or error is emitted
25
+ at the workflow syntax level.
26
+
27
+ This happens because the runner agent's service container feature requires Docker
28
+ to be integrated at the runner daemon level. GitHub-hosted macOS and Windows runners
29
+ do not have a running Docker daemon available to the runner agent by default, making
30
+ the `services:` lifecycle management impossible.
31
+
32
+ The failure is deceptive: the job starts normally, all steps run, but any step that
33
+ tries to connect to the service (e.g., PostgreSQL on port 5432, Redis on port 6379)
34
+ receives a connection refused error. The `services:` block produces no visible error
35
+ of its own.
36
+
37
+ There is no GitHub Actions built-in mechanism to make `services:` work on macOS or
38
+ Windows runners. This is a permanent platform limitation.
39
+ fix: |
40
+ Use a Linux (ubuntu-*) runner for any job that requires service containers. If macOS
41
+ or Windows testing is required alongside a service dependency, start the service
42
+ manually as workflow steps within the job instead of using the `services:` block.
43
+ fix_code:
44
+ - language: yaml
45
+ label: "services: block — only works on Linux runners"
46
+ code: |
47
+ jobs:
48
+ test:
49
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest # services: requires Linux
50
+ services:
51
+ postgres:
52
+ image: postgres:15
53
+ env:
54
+ POSTGRES_PASSWORD: postgres
55
+ ports:
56
+ - 5432:5432
57
+ options: >-
58
+ --health-cmd pg_isready
59
+ --health-interval 10s
60
+ --health-timeout 5s
61
+ --health-retries 5
62
+ steps:
63
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
64
+ - run: npm test
65
+ - language: yaml
66
+ label: "macOS/Windows: start service manually as a workflow step"
67
+ code: |
68
+ jobs:
69
+ test-macos:
70
+ runs-on: macos-latest
71
+ # services: is NOT supported here — start the service manually instead
72
+ steps:
73
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
74
+ - name: Start PostgreSQL (services: not supported on macOS)
75
+ run: |
76
+ brew install postgresql@15
77
+ brew services start postgresql@15
78
+ sleep 5
79
+ - run: npm test
80
+ prevention:
81
+ - "Always pair the `services:` block with a Linux (ubuntu-*) runner — treat this as a hard rule in code review"
82
+ - "If cross-platform testing needs a service dependency, isolate the service-dependent tests into a Linux-only job"
83
+ - "Add a comment near the `services:` block to document that this job must run on Linux"
84
+ docs:
85
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/use-cases-and-examples/using-containerized-services/about-service-containers"
86
+ label: "GitHub Docs: About service containers (Linux-only requirement)"
87
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idservices"
88
+ label: "GitHub Docs: jobs.<job_id>.services syntax reference"
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
1
+ id: permissions-auth-045
2
+ title: "GITHUB_TOKEN has read-only access in pull_request workflows from forks — write operations return 403"
3
+ category: permissions-auth
4
+ severity: error
5
+ tags:
6
+ - github-token
7
+ - fork
8
+ - pull-request
9
+ - read-only
10
+ - permissions
11
+ - resource-not-accessible
12
+ - write-access
13
+ patterns:
14
+ - regex: 'Resource not accessible by integration'
15
+ flags: i
16
+ - regex: 'HttpError: Resource not accessible by integration'
17
+ flags: i
18
+ - regex: 'Error: HttpError: Not Found.*token.*forked'
19
+ flags: i
20
+ - regex: 'refused.*write.*403.*pull_request.*fork'
21
+ flags: i
22
+ error_messages:
23
+ - "Error: Resource not accessible by integration"
24
+ - "RequestError [HttpError]: Resource not accessible by integration"
25
+ - "Error: HttpError: Resource not accessible by integration"
26
+ root_cause: |
27
+ When a pull_request workflow is triggered by a PR from a forked repository, GitHub
28
+ automatically restricts the GITHUB_TOKEN to read-only permissions. This security measure
29
+ prevents malicious PRs from using the token to modify the base repository — the token
30
+ cannot create issues, post comments, create releases, trigger deployments, or write to
31
+ the repository. Workflows see a token that behaves as if all write permissions were denied.
32
+
33
+ This restriction applies even if the workflow YAML has explicit permissions: write entries.
34
+ The fork security boundary takes precedence. The workflow still runs (unlike pull_request_target
35
+ which runs with base repo permissions), but the token scope is silently reduced.
36
+
37
+ Common victims include: posting PR comments with github-script, uploading artifacts to
38
+ releases, creating check runs, and updating commit statuses.
39
+ fix: |
40
+ Use the pull_request_target event if the workflow must write to the base repo. Be aware
41
+ that pull_request_target checks out the base branch by default (not the PR head) and carries
42
+ security implications — never checkout and execute untrusted PR code with write-permission
43
+ tokens (see pwn request attacks). For safe comment posting, split into two workflows:
44
+ a read-only pull_request workflow that uploads results as an artifact, and a
45
+ pull_request_target or workflow_run workflow with write access that downloads the artifact
46
+ and posts the comment.
47
+ fix_code:
48
+ - language: yaml
49
+ label: "Split pattern — upload results in pull_request, post comment in workflow_run"
50
+ code: |
51
+ # Workflow 1: pr-test.yml — runs on pull_request (fork-safe, read-only token)
52
+ on: pull_request
53
+
54
+ jobs:
55
+ test:
56
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
57
+ steps:
58
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
59
+ - name: Run tests and save results
60
+ run: npm test > test-results.txt 2>&1 || true
61
+ - name: Upload PR number for downstream workflow
62
+ uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
63
+ with:
64
+ name: pr-results
65
+ path: |
66
+ test-results.txt
67
+ - language: yaml
68
+ label: "Workflow 2 — post comment using workflow_run (has write token)"
69
+ code: |
70
+ # Workflow 2: pr-comment.yml — runs after pr-test.yml completes (has write token)
71
+ on:
72
+ workflow_run:
73
+ workflows: ["PR Tests"]
74
+ types: [completed]
75
+
76
+ permissions:
77
+ pull-requests: write
78
+
79
+ jobs:
80
+ comment:
81
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
82
+ steps:
83
+ - name: Download test results artifact
84
+ uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
85
+ with:
86
+ name: pr-results
87
+ run-id: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.id }}
88
+ github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
89
+ - name: Post PR comment
90
+ uses: actions/github-script@v7
91
+ with:
92
+ script: |
93
+ const fs = require('fs');
94
+ const results = fs.readFileSync('test-results.txt', 'utf8');
95
+ await github.rest.issues.createComment({
96
+ owner: context.repo.owner,
97
+ repo: context.repo.repo,
98
+ issue_number: context.payload.workflow_run.pull_requests[0].number,
99
+ body: '## Test Results\n```\n' + results + '\n```'
100
+ });
101
+ prevention:
102
+ - "Know that GITHUB_TOKEN is read-only for PR workflows from forks — this is a security feature, not a misconfiguration"
103
+ - "Never use pull_request_target to run PR head code with write-permission tokens — this creates a pwn request vulnerability"
104
+ - "Use the upload-artifact + workflow_run split pattern for safe cross-fork write operations"
105
+ - "Test workflows with a fork PR specifically if they perform write operations — the token scope difference won't appear in same-repo PRs"
106
+ docs:
107
+ - url: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request
108
+ label: "GitHub Docs: pull_request event — fork permission restrictions"
109
+ - url: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-for-github-actions/security-guides/automatic-token-authentication#permissions-for-the-github_token
110
+ label: "GitHub Docs: GITHUB_TOKEN permissions"
111
+ - url: https://securitylab.github.com/research/github-actions-preventing-pwn-requests/
112
+ label: "GitHub Security Lab: Preventing pwn requests (pull_request_target risks)"
113
+ - url: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70435286/resource-not-accessible-by-integration-on-github-pull-request-event
114
+ label: "Stack Overflow: Resource not accessible by integration on pull_request"
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
1
+ id: silent-failures-063
2
+ title: "actions/cache cache-hit output is empty string on miss, not 'false' — equality checks silently never match"
3
+ category: silent-failures
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - actions-cache
7
+ - cache-hit
8
+ - output
9
+ - empty-string
10
+ - if-condition
11
+ - false-comparison
12
+ patterns:
13
+ - regex: 'steps\.\w+\.outputs\.cache-hit\s*==\s*[''"]false[''"]'
14
+ flags: i
15
+ - regex: "cache-hit.*==.*'false'"
16
+ flags: i
17
+ error_messages:
18
+ - "cache-hit output comparison to 'false' always evaluates to false — use != 'true' instead"
19
+ root_cause: |
20
+ The actions/cache action sets the cache-hit output to the string 'true' when a cache is
21
+ restored from an exact key match, and to an empty string '' when the cache is not found
22
+ (including when restored from a restore-keys fallback, which returns '' for cache-hit in v3
23
+ and 'false' only in some v4 configurations). This means that
24
+ `if: steps.cache.outputs.cache-hit == 'false'` evaluates to false on a cache miss because
25
+ '' != 'false', so the step or job it guards is silently skipped.
26
+
27
+ This is one of the most upvoted GitHub Actions questions on Stack Overflow. Developers
28
+ naturally expect a boolean-like output to be 'true' or 'false', but the cache action uses
29
+ 'true' vs '' (empty) semantics. The step appears to run successfully; nothing in the logs
30
+ indicates the if condition did not match as expected.
31
+ fix: |
32
+ Check for cache miss using != 'true' instead of == 'false'. An empty string and 'false'
33
+ both evaluate to not-equal-to-'true', so this pattern correctly handles all cache miss
34
+ cases across cache action versions. Alternatively, use the boolean expression
35
+ `steps.cache.outputs.cache-hit != 'true'` or omit the check and rely on the cache action's
36
+ lookup-only: true parameter combined with a separate save step.
37
+ fix_code:
38
+ - language: yaml
39
+ label: "Use != 'true' to reliably detect cache miss (works across all cache action versions)"
40
+ code: |
41
+ - name: Cache dependencies
42
+ id: cache-deps
43
+ uses: actions/cache@v4
44
+ with:
45
+ path: ~/.npm
46
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}
47
+
48
+ # WRONG — silently never runs on cache miss:
49
+ # - name: Install deps
50
+ # if: steps.cache-deps.outputs.cache-hit == 'false'
51
+
52
+ # CORRECT — matches both '' and 'false':
53
+ - name: Install dependencies
54
+ if: steps.cache-deps.outputs.cache-hit != 'true'
55
+ run: npm ci
56
+ - language: yaml
57
+ label: "Lookup-only + explicit save pattern (cache@v4) to avoid output ambiguity"
58
+ code: |
59
+ - name: Restore cache (lookup only, no auto-save)
60
+ id: cache-restore
61
+ uses: actions/cache/restore@v4
62
+ with:
63
+ path: ~/.npm
64
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}
65
+
66
+ - name: Install dependencies
67
+ if: steps.cache-restore.outputs.cache-hit != 'true'
68
+ run: npm ci
69
+
70
+ - name: Save cache
71
+ if: steps.cache-restore.outputs.cache-hit != 'true'
72
+ uses: actions/cache/save@v4
73
+ with:
74
+ path: ~/.npm
75
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}
76
+ prevention:
77
+ - "Always use != 'true' to check for cache miss — never use == 'false' on cache action outputs"
78
+ - "Review the cache action version changelog: v3 uses '' on miss, v4 behavior depends on exact/partial hit"
79
+ - "Add a debug step that echoes cache-hit output to make cache behavior visible in logs during development"
80
+ - "Consult the cache action README for the exact semantics of cache-hit, cache-primary-key, and cache-matched-key"
81
+ docs:
82
+ - url: https://github.com/actions/cache#outputs
83
+ label: "actions/cache README: Outputs"
84
+ - url: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62754195/github-actions-cache-hit-is-true-but-id-expect-false
85
+ label: "Stack Overflow: cache-hit is empty string, not 'false'"
86
+ - url: https://github.com/actions/cache/issues/1699
87
+ label: "actions/cache#1699: cache-hit output '' vs 'false' confusion"
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
1
+ id: silent-failures-064
2
+ title: "workflow_run Trigger: github.sha Points to Default Branch HEAD, Not Triggering Workflow's Commit"
3
+ category: silent-failures
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - workflow_run
7
+ - github-sha
8
+ - checkout
9
+ - wrong-commit
10
+ - cross-workflow
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'on\s*:\s*\n\s+workflow_run'
13
+ flags: 'im'
14
+ - regex: 'github\.sha'
15
+ flags: 'i'
16
+ error_messages:
17
+ - "Unexpected checkout SHA — does not match pull request head commit"
18
+ - "Tests passing on default branch but failing on PR commit"
19
+ root_cause: |
20
+ When a workflow is triggered by `on: workflow_run`, the `github.sha` and `github.ref`
21
+ context variables point to the HEAD of the **default branch** at the time the trigger
22
+ fires, NOT to the commit that triggered the upstream workflow. This is by design: the
23
+ `workflow_run` event executes in the context of the base repository's default branch.
24
+
25
+ Workflows that use `actions/checkout` without specifying a `ref` will silently check
26
+ out the default branch — running against entirely different code than the PR or branch
27
+ that triggered the original CI workflow. CI results, security scans, and deployments
28
+ end up referencing the wrong commit with no visible error.
29
+
30
+ The correct commit SHA from the triggering workflow is available in the event payload
31
+ as `github.event.workflow_run.head_sha`.
32
+ fix: |
33
+ Use `github.event.workflow_run.head_sha` as the `ref` in `actions/checkout` within
34
+ any `workflow_run` triggered workflow. When the triggering workflow originates from a
35
+ fork PR, also supply `github.event.workflow_run.head_repository.full_name` as the
36
+ `repository` input so the correct fork is checked out.
37
+ fix_code:
38
+ - language: yaml
39
+ label: "Wrong: default checkout uses github.sha (default branch HEAD)"
40
+ code: |
41
+ on:
42
+ workflow_run:
43
+ workflows: ["CI"]
44
+ types: [completed]
45
+
46
+ jobs:
47
+ process:
48
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
49
+ steps:
50
+ # Silently checks out default branch, NOT the triggering commit
51
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
52
+ - language: yaml
53
+ label: "Correct: use workflow_run event payload for the right commit"
54
+ code: |
55
+ on:
56
+ workflow_run:
57
+ workflows: ["CI"]
58
+ types: [completed]
59
+
60
+ jobs:
61
+ process:
62
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
63
+ steps:
64
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
65
+ with:
66
+ repository: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_repository.full_name }}
67
+ ref: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_sha }}
68
+ token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
69
+ prevention:
70
+ - "Always set `ref: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_sha }}` in checkout steps inside workflow_run triggered workflows"
71
+ - "Log both `github.sha` and `github.event.workflow_run.head_sha` at workflow start to verify they match when expected"
72
+ - "For fork-originated PRs, also set `repository: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_repository.full_name }}`"
73
+ - "Add a comment in the workflow explaining why head_sha is used instead of github.sha to avoid future confusion"
74
+ docs:
75
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/events-that-trigger-workflows#workflow_run"
76
+ label: "GitHub Docs: workflow_run event (context behavior)"
77
+ - url: "https://securitylab.github.com/resources/github-actions-preventing-pwn-requests/"
78
+ label: "GitHub Security Lab: Preventing pwn requests (workflow_run checkout patterns)"
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
1
+ id: triggers-046
2
+ title: "github.event.commits Array Truncated to 20 Commits on Large Pushes"
3
+ category: triggers
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - push
7
+ - commits
8
+ - github-event
9
+ - truncated
10
+ - commit-messages
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'github\.event\.commits'
13
+ flags: 'i'
14
+ error_messages:
15
+ - "Only processing 20 of N commits"
16
+ - "Missing commits in push event payload"
17
+ root_cause: |
18
+ When a push event triggers a workflow, the `github.event.commits` array is capped at
19
+ a maximum of 20 commit objects, regardless of how many commits were included in the
20
+ push. This limit applies to the webhook payload that populates the `github.event`
21
+ context and is documented in the GitHub webhook specification.
22
+
23
+ Workflows that iterate over `github.event.commits` to extract commit messages for
24
+ changelog generation, enforce commit message formatting (Conventional Commits, etc.),
25
+ or trigger conditional logic based on commit content will silently miss any commits
26
+ beyond the 20th. The job completes successfully with no indication that commits were
27
+ dropped from the payload.
28
+
29
+ Commonly affected use cases:
30
+ - Automated changelog or release note generation from push commit messages
31
+ - Commit message linting or conventional commits enforcement
32
+ - Workflows triggered by specific keywords in commit messages
33
+ - Security scanning workflows that enumerate all modified files from commit diffs
34
+ fix: |
35
+ Use `git log` with the push SHA range (`github.event.before..github.event.after`) to
36
+ enumerate all commits in the push, regardless of count. This requires checking out
37
+ the repository with `fetch-depth: 0` (full history) or at minimum enough depth to
38
+ span the push range. Guard against the `before` SHA being all zeros (first push to
39
+ a new branch).
40
+ fix_code:
41
+ - language: yaml
42
+ label: "Wrong: iterating github.event.commits silently misses commits beyond 20"
43
+ code: |
44
+ - name: Lint commit messages
45
+ run: |
46
+ # Silently processes only up to 20 commits even on large pushes
47
+ echo '${{ toJSON(github.event.commits) }}' \
48
+ | jq -r '.[].message' \
49
+ | npx commitlint --from stdin
50
+ - language: yaml
51
+ label: "Correct: use git log with push range to enumerate all commits"
52
+ code: |
53
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
54
+ with:
55
+ fetch-depth: 0 # full history required for git log range
56
+
57
+ - name: Lint all commit messages in push
58
+ run: |
59
+ BEFORE="${{ github.event.before }}"
60
+ AFTER="${{ github.event.after }}"
61
+
62
+ # Guard: first push to a new branch has before = 000...000
63
+ if [ "$BEFORE" = "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000" ]; then
64
+ echo "First push to new branch — scanning tip commit only"
65
+ git log -1 --format="%s" "$AFTER"
66
+ else
67
+ git log --format="%s" "${BEFORE}..${AFTER}"
68
+ fi | npx commitlint --from stdin
69
+ prevention:
70
+ - "Never rely on `github.event.commits` for exhaustive commit enumeration on pushes — use `git log` with the SHA range instead"
71
+ - "Always add `fetch-depth: 0` to checkout when your workflow needs to enumerate commits from the push range"
72
+ - "Guard against `github.event.before` being all zeros (new branch first push) before running `git log BEFORE..AFTER`"
73
+ - "If commit count matters, log a warning when `github.event.commits | length == 20` to detect truncation"
74
+ docs:
75
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/webhooks/webhook-events-and-payloads#push"
76
+ label: "GitHub Docs: Push webhook payload (20 commit limit)"
77
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/events-that-trigger-workflows#push"
78
+ label: "GitHub Docs: push event trigger"
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
1
+ id: triggers-045
2
+ title: "on.push.paths filter has no effect on workflow_dispatch — manual trigger always runs regardless of changed files"
3
+ category: triggers
4
+ severity: silent-failure
5
+ tags:
6
+ - workflow-dispatch
7
+ - push
8
+ - paths-filter
9
+ - triggers
10
+ - manual-trigger
11
+ - always-runs
12
+ patterns:
13
+ - regex: 'workflow_dispatch'
14
+ flags: i
15
+ error_messages:
16
+ - "Workflow ran unexpectedly when triggered via workflow_dispatch despite paths filter"
17
+ root_cause: |
18
+ GitHub Actions evaluates on.push.paths (and on.push.paths-ignore) filters only for push
19
+ events. The filter is tied to the event type it is defined under. When workflow_dispatch is
20
+ added as a separate trigger, it has no paths context — there is no commit diff associated
21
+ with a manual dispatch. GitHub therefore runs the workflow unconditionally when dispatched.
22
+
23
+ This surprises developers who add workflow_dispatch: to an existing push-triggered workflow
24
+ for convenience and expect the paths filter to still gate the run. The workflow_dispatch
25
+ event has no paths or branches key at all; any such keys would be silently ignored if added.
26
+
27
+ A related confusion: paths filters on pull_request or push do not protect against
28
+ workflow_dispatch, so adding a workflow_dispatch trigger effectively creates an unfiltered
29
+ entry point into the workflow.
30
+ fix: |
31
+ Accept that workflow_dispatch runs unconditionally — this is intentional GitHub behavior.
32
+ If you want to restrict what the dispatched workflow does based on inputs, use
33
+ workflow_dispatch inputs to pass a flag and gate steps with if: conditions. If the goal is
34
+ to limit accidental runs, remove workflow_dispatch from workflows where paths-gating is
35
+ critical, or add a required input that must be confirmed before proceeding.
36
+ fix_code:
37
+ - language: yaml
38
+ label: "Separate push-only workflow (with paths filter) from a dispatch-friendly workflow"
39
+ code: |
40
+ # Option 1: keep push and dispatch as separate workflow files
41
+ # push-filtered.yml — only triggered on relevant path changes
42
+ on:
43
+ push:
44
+ paths:
45
+ - 'src/**'
46
+
47
+ # dispatch-build.yml — no paths filter needed; always intentional
48
+ on:
49
+ workflow_dispatch:
50
+ - language: yaml
51
+ label: "Use a workflow_dispatch input to require confirmation before running"
52
+ code: |
53
+ on:
54
+ push:
55
+ paths:
56
+ - 'src/**'
57
+ workflow_dispatch:
58
+ inputs:
59
+ confirm:
60
+ description: 'Type YES to run regardless of changed files'
61
+ required: true
62
+
63
+ jobs:
64
+ build:
65
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
66
+ steps:
67
+ - name: Proceed only if push triggered by path change OR dispatch confirmed
68
+ if: github.event_name == 'push' || inputs.confirm == 'YES'
69
+ run: echo "Running build"
70
+ prevention:
71
+ - "Understand that paths/branches filters are per-event-type — workflow_dispatch has no file diff context"
72
+ - "Document in the workflow file that workflow_dispatch runs unconditionally to avoid future confusion"
73
+ - "Use workflow_dispatch inputs to gate critical steps when a manual trigger is added to a path-filtered workflow"
74
+ - "Review which workflows have both push.paths filters and workflow_dispatch before adding the dispatch trigger"
75
+ docs:
76
+ - url: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/events-that-trigger-workflows#workflow_dispatch
77
+ label: "GitHub Docs: workflow_dispatch event"
78
+ - url: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-when-your-workflow-runs/triggering-a-workflow#using-filters-to-target-specific-branches-or-tags-for-push-events
79
+ label: "GitHub Docs: Using filters to target specific paths"
80
+ - url: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65900201/workflow-dispatch-ignores-paths-filter
81
+ label: "Stack Overflow: workflow_dispatch ignores paths filter"
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
1
+ id: yaml-syntax-043
2
+ title: "env Context Not Available in runs-on Expression — Job Waits for Non-Existent Runner"
3
+ category: yaml-syntax
4
+ severity: error
5
+ tags:
6
+ - runs-on
7
+ - env-context
8
+ - context-availability
9
+ - runner-selection
10
+ - expression
11
+ patterns:
12
+ - regex: 'runs-on\s*:.*\$\{\{.*env\.'
13
+ flags: 'i'
14
+ error_messages:
15
+ - "No runner matching the specified labels was found"
16
+ - "Context access might be invalid: env"
17
+ - "Evaluates to empty string in runs-on"
18
+ root_cause: |
19
+ The `env` context is not available in `jobs.<job_id>.runs-on` expressions. GitHub
20
+ Actions documents an explicit context availability table, and `env` is excluded from
21
+ the `runs-on` field. Only the `github`, `needs`, `strategy`, `matrix`, `vars`, and
22
+ `inputs` contexts are available for `runs-on` expressions.
23
+
24
+ When a developer writes `runs-on: ${{ env.RUNNER_LABEL }}`, the expression evaluates
25
+ to an empty string (since `env` is not accessible at that evaluation point). GitHub
26
+ Actions may emit the warning "Context access might be invalid: env" during workflow
27
+ parsing. The job then queues waiting for a runner matching an empty or literal label,
28
+ which never matches, and the job hangs until it times out.
29
+
30
+ This is a common mistake when setting a custom self-hosted runner label as a
31
+ workflow-level or job-level `env:` variable and trying to reference it in `runs-on`
32
+ for DRY configuration.
33
+ fix: |
34
+ Use the `vars` context (repository, organization, or environment variables) instead of
35
+ `env` for dynamic runner label selection. Repository variables can be set in the
36
+ repository's Settings > Secrets and variables > Variables and referenced as
37
+ `${{ vars.RUNNER_LABEL }}`. The `vars` context IS available in `runs-on` expressions.
38
+
39
+ Alternatively, use `inputs` context for `workflow_dispatch` triggered workflows to
40
+ allow callers to specify the runner label.
41
+ fix_code:
42
+ - language: yaml
43
+ label: "Wrong: env context is not available in runs-on"
44
+ code: |
45
+ env:
46
+ RUNNER_LABEL: self-hosted-prod # This env var cannot be used in runs-on
47
+
48
+ jobs:
49
+ deploy:
50
+ # ERROR: env context unavailable — expression evaluates to empty string
51
+ runs-on: ${{ env.RUNNER_LABEL }}
52
+ - language: yaml
53
+ label: "Correct: use vars context (repository/org variable)"
54
+ code: |
55
+ # Set RUNNER_LABEL in Settings > Secrets and variables > Variables (repo or org level)
56
+ jobs:
57
+ deploy:
58
+ runs-on: ${{ vars.RUNNER_LABEL || 'ubuntu-latest' }}
59
+ - language: yaml
60
+ label: "Correct: use inputs for workflow_dispatch dynamic runner selection"
61
+ code: |
62
+ on:
63
+ workflow_dispatch:
64
+ inputs:
65
+ runner:
66
+ description: 'Runner label'
67
+ default: 'ubuntu-latest'
68
+ type: string
69
+
70
+ jobs:
71
+ deploy:
72
+ runs-on: ${{ inputs.runner }}
73
+ prevention:
74
+ - "Check GitHub's context availability table before using any context in `runs-on` — `env` is NOT available there"
75
+ - "Use `vars.*` (repository or org variables) not `env.*` for dynamic runner label configuration"
76
+ - "Add `|| 'ubuntu-latest'` as a fallback in `runs-on` expressions to avoid jobs that queue indefinitely"
77
+ - "If the job hangs immediately after queuing with no runner assignment, check `runs-on` expressions for invalid context usage"
78
+ docs:
79
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/contexts#context-availability"
80
+ label: "GitHub Docs: Context availability table (runs-on allowed contexts)"
81
+ - url: "https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idruns-on"
82
+ label: "GitHub Docs: jobs.<job_id>.runs-on expressions"
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@htekdev/actions-debugger",
3
- "version": "1.0.62",
3
+ "version": "1.0.64",
4
4
  "description": "65+ real GitHub Actions errors, queryable by agents. CLI + MCP server + Copilot skills + error database.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "main": "./dist/index.js",