veracious 0.0.1

data/README.rdoc

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+=Introduction
+
+Gee... it sure would be awesome if ActiveResource _actually_ allowed us to do client-side validation of our ActiveResource objects
+like their documentation promises:http://apidock.com/rails/ActiveResource/Base

data/lib/veracious.rb

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+require 'veracious/veracious_activeresource_enhancement'

data/lib/veracious/veracious_activeresource_enhancement.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+ActiveResource::Base.class_eval do
+  def valid_with_client_side?
+    errors.clear
+    validate if defined?(validate)
+    valid_without_client_side?
+  end
+  
+  alias_method_chain :valid?, :client_side
+end

data/spec/lib_specs/activeresource_validation_spec.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+require File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/../spec_helper')
+
+describe "ActiveResource" do
+  describe "Base" do
+    it "should validate client side without requiring a \"create\" or \"save\" call" do
+      class Book < ActiveResource::Base
+        self.site = ''
+        protected
+        def validate
+          errors.add(:author, 'is required') if (author.blank? rescue false)
+        end
+      end
+      @book = Book.new :author => ''
+      @book.valid?.should == false
+      @book.errors.on(:author).should == "is required"
+      @book.errors.count.should == 1
+    end
+    
+    it "should not fail if the user has not defined the validate method" do
+      class Novel < ActiveResource::Base
+        self.site = ''
+      end
+      @book = Novel.new :author => ''
+      @book.valid?.should == true
+      @book.errors.on(:author).should == nil
+      @book.errors.count.should == 0
+    end
+  end
+end

data/spec/spec_helper.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+$LOAD_PATH << './lib'
+require 'activeresource'
+require 'veracious'

metadata

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+--- !ruby/object:Gem::Specification 
+name: veracious
+version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
+  version: 0.0.1
+platform: ruby
+authors: 
+- Matt Parker
+autorequire: 
+bindir: bin
+cert_chain: []
+
+date: 2009-11-09 00:00:00 -05:00
+default_executable: 
+dependencies: 
+- !ruby/object:Gem::Dependency 
+  name: rails
+  type: :runtime
+  version_requirement: 
+  version_requirements: !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement 
+    requirements: 
+    - - ">="
+      - !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
+        version: 2.3.3
+    version: 
+description: "Gee\xE2\x80\xA6 it sure would be awesome if ActiveResource actually allowed usto do client-side validation of our ActiveResource objects like theirdocumentation promises: http://apidock.com/rails/ActiveResource/Base"
+email: moonmaster9000@gmail.com
+executables: []
+
+extensions: []
+
+extra_rdoc_files: 
+- README.rdoc
+files: 
+- README.rdoc
+- lib/veracious.rb
+- lib/veracious/veracious_activeresource_enhancement.rb
+has_rdoc: true
+homepage: http://github.com/moonmaster9000/veracious
+licenses: []
+
+post_install_message: 
+rdoc_options: 
+- --charset=UTF-8
+require_paths: 
+- lib
+required_ruby_version: !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement 
+  requirements: 
+  - - ">="
+    - !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
+      version: "0"
+  version: 
+required_rubygems_version: !ruby/object:Gem::Requirement 
+  requirements: 
+  - - ">="
+    - !ruby/object:Gem::Version 
+      version: "0"
+  version: 
+requirements: []
+
+rubyforge_project: 
+rubygems_version: 1.3.5
+signing_key: 
+specification_version: 3
+summary: Client side validation of Active Resource objects
+test_files: 
+- spec/lib_specs/activeresource_validation_spec.rb
+- spec/spec_helper.rb